Aadhaar was introduced in 2009 as a unique identity scheme to facilitate welfare schemes, but over time became a requirement to access many services. There were no privacy laws or data protection at the time vast amounts of personal information were being collected. This allowed the government unchecked access to citizen data without proper safeguards. The 2016 Aadhaar Act further legitimized the collection and storage of data. However, the recent Supreme Court verdict recognized privacy as a fundamental right and struck down many unconstitutional aspects of Aadhaar, but citizen data remains at risk without stronger data protection laws and oversight.
Aadhaar was introduced in 2009 as a unique identity scheme to facilitate welfare schemes, but over time became a requirement to access many services. There were no privacy laws or data protection at the time vast amounts of personal information were being collected. This allowed the government unchecked access to citizen data without proper safeguards. The 2016 Aadhaar Act further legitimized the collection and storage of data. However, the recent Supreme Court verdict recognized privacy as a fundamental right and struck down many unconstitutional aspects of Aadhaar, but citizen data remains at risk without stronger data protection laws and oversight.
Aadhaar was introduced in 2009 as a unique identity scheme to facilitate welfare schemes, but over time became a requirement to access many services. There were no privacy laws or data protection at the time vast amounts of personal information were being collected. This allowed the government unchecked access to citizen data without proper safeguards. The 2016 Aadhaar Act further legitimized the collection and storage of data. However, the recent Supreme Court verdict recognized privacy as a fundamental right and struck down many unconstitutional aspects of Aadhaar, but citizen data remains at risk without stronger data protection laws and oversight.
Since the introduction of Aadhaar in 2009 by the Manmohan Singh led
UPA government, there have been various transformations in the way it functions. This instrument of facilitation to subsidies and welfare schemes which was introduced as a “Unique ID scheme” of India for the implementation of fiscal welfare schemes was eventually metamorphosed to an authentication key for availing the benefits of society and state. Under the mechanism of Aadhaar, it collects the individuals’ personal information and biometrics, to assign them a unique identity which they use to facilitate them with subsidy schemes and other measures. As per the government’s rationale, it further helps the state to keep a check on the counterfeit of identity which further cumbers many illegal malpractices. It is not the welfare policy aim which raises the argument against Aadhaar but the intricacies involved in this collection of private data and its security. The crux of its problem lies in the fact that its data collection mechanism was implemented when there was no legislation or judicial clarity on the fundamentality of privacy. Neither was there any legislation on data protection which safeguarded our personal information that we handed to the state. So, all in all, there was no regulatory or justice mechanism in place to prevent breach of data, which gave the government sacrosanctity to bring to any use, the citizens’ private information. In 2016, when the Aadhaar Act was passed in the garb of a money bill, further protecting it from the Rajya Sabha review, it ensured that the unregulated data collection and storage now had a legal backing, legitimising all actions of the government with nothing to challenge it without any privacy laws in place. In this light when the Aadhaar was finally challenged, came the landmark KS Puttaswamy vs Union of India judgement making Right to Privacy a fundamental right encompassed under the Article 21 of the constitution. Now that a judicial decision in light of privacy was in place, we became legally empowered to challenge the Aadhaar scheme which eventually was turning into a draconian instrument of state surveillance. Although, legally Aadhaar was still voluntary in nature, its mandatory linking to almost all services of our everyday life, be it banking, telecom services, vehicle and real estate transactions, made it practically coercive in nature. So, Aadhaar in its conceptualization may have been a state welfare scheme with great ideals of citizen well being and an integrated system of ensuring national security, but its implementation encompassed such means of coercion and exploitation that it become an anti-thesis of the very same. The Supreme Court in the recent Aadhaar verdict analysed the same demonic nature of the Aadhaar Act, and delivered justice by striking down most of its unconstitutional aspects giving it only a fiscal nature as a money bill is ought to have. Though Aadhaar now remains powerless in terms of establishing surveillance, it still holds sensitive information of Indian citizens that stand on the edge of this abyss of data breach and indicates an immediate requirement of data protection laws and regulatory authority. We, as citizens, must understand now the significance of the boon under Article 21 i.e. privacy and the state on the other hand should learn to respect it and never again try to paint in the canvas of future, the dystopian and draconian picture that it did with Aadhaar.