Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report

HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT

for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1. Highway Design Report

National Highways Authority of India acting through the Project Director (NHAI) is
engaged in the development of the State Highways. As part of this endeavor, NHAI
has invited bidders for the project namely “Consultancy services for Feasibility study
and Preparation of Detailed Project Report for four laning of Hyderabad-karimanagar-
Chanda road (Mancherial to Maharashtra state border) in the state of Telangana”.

National Highways Authority of India has awarded the Design Consultancy Services
for “Consultancy services for feasibility study and preparation of Detailed project
report for four laning of Hyderabad-karimanagar-Chanda road (Mancherial to
Maharashtra state border) in the state of Telangana” to M/s Aarvee Associates
Architects Engineers & Consultants Pvt. Ltd. The Consultancy Agreement was signed
on 28th Nov 2015.

The package-II of project stretch starts at Km 288.510 located at Repallewada and

ends at Km 342.00 on Hyderabad – Karimnagar – Chanda road.

1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to prepare a proposal to retrofit a Four lane
cross-section with service road in open areas on to the existing highway in a manner
which ensures

• Enhanced safety and level of service for the road users

• Superior operation and maintenance enabling enhanced operational efficiency

of the Project Highway

• Minimal adverse impact on the local population and road users due to road
construction

• Minimal adverse impact on environment

• Minimal additional acquisition of land; and

• Phased development of the Project Highway for improving its financial viability
consistent with the need to minimize frequent inconvenience to traffic that
may be caused if additional works are undertaken within a period of seven
years from the commencement of construction of the Project Highway.

1-1
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1.2 PROJECT ROAD

The details of the project road are as follows:

Table 1.1: Project Road Package-II Details

Chainage
SH Length
Section State
No km.
From(Km) To(Km)

Mancherial to
Maharashtra Border on
Hyderabad-Karimnagar- 288.510 342.00 SH 1 Telangana 53.49
Chanda Road (Package-
II)

The Package-II of Project road passes through the built up areas of Puli Kunta,
Rebbena, Kharigaon, Motiguda, Burgada, Asifabad, Wankadi, Neemgaon, Bambara,
Gaogaon, Boyapally.

The stretch is having two lane configuration for about 52.59 km and four lane
configuration for 0.9 km. The existing lane configuration is as given below:

Table 1.2: Lane Configuration Details

Existing Chainage Lane

Configuration
From(Km) To(Km)
288.510 316.200 2 - Lane
316.200 317.100 4 - Lane
317.100 342.000 2 - Lane

1-2
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

The location map of the project stretch is shown in Fig. 1.1.

Fig. 1.1: Project Stretch

1.3 EXISTING FEATURES OF THE PROJECT

The existing project road is having both four lane and two lane carriageway
configuration. The existing two-lane carriageway width is 7.0m with earthen
shoulders of about 0.3 – 2.0 m width on either side. The following are some of the
deficiencies in existing Project highway.

1. The level of service is going to deteriorate in coming years in some of the

sections.

2. Congestion and delays in built-up areas since the local traffic is not
segregated from through traffic.

3. No access control.

4. Fast moving vehicles competing with slow moving vehicles for the pavement
space in habitations.

5. Inadequate provisions for pedestrians such as footpath, pedestrian crossings

etc.

6. Horizontal alignment and vertical profiles are sub-standard at few locations.

1-3
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1.3.1 Terrain
Terrain is classified by the general slope of the country across the highway alignment.
Based on this criteria, it is observed that 64.40% of the project stretch traverses
through plain terrain, 34% passes through rolling terrain and 1.6% passes through
hilly areas.. Fig. 1.2 shows the typical plain & rolling terrain along the project stretch.

Fig.1.2 Plain and Rolling Terrains

1.3.2 Land Use

The majority of adjoining land is observed to be built up sections and Barren land.
The Project stretch passes through major built up areas of Puli Kunta, Rebbena,
Kharigaon, Motiguda, Burgada, Asifabad, Wankadi, Neemgaon, Bambara, Gaogaon,
Boyapally. The type of land use pattern that exists along the project stretch is
presented in Table – 1.3. The Fig. 1.3 depicts the prevailing land use pattern.

Table – 1.3: Land Use Details

TYPE LHS RHS

Built up 60% 63%
Barren 9% 10%
Forest 21% 19%
Open Land 3% 3%
Agriculture 7% 4%
Total 100% 100%

1-4
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Fig.1.3 Built Up Locations along the project stretch

1.4 DESIGN STANDARDS

1.4.1 General

Geometric design of the highway, except for cross sectional requirements, shall be in
accordance with four lane manual IRC:SP:84-2014. Design standards will be
maintained throughout the length of Project Highway in accordance with Manuals. All
deficiencies in the existing highway geometry will be rectified to meet the minimum
standards.

1.4.2 General cross-sectional requirements

The design of cross section of the four lane highway will take into account the
following general requirements:

(i) The new four lane highway, as far as possible, shall fit into the existing
section without rendering the existing road facilities, unless essential or
required to fulfill other functional requirements.

(ii) The developed cross sections for the carriageway as well as the service
road will have operational safety in focus such as segregation, separation,
turning radii, gradients, etc and provisions for various types of movements
and maneuvers like merge, diverge, weave, etc will be comprehensively
considered and provided for.

(iii) Provisions will be made in the cross-section for accommodating utilities

both over as well as underground as the case may be. A 2.0 m wide strip
of land at the extreme edge of ROW may be kept for accommodating

1-5
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

utility services. Provisions contained in IRC:98-1997 will be followed to

accommodate utility services for Project Highway in built up areas.

(iv) As far as possible, uniformity of design standards will be maintained

throughout the length of the Project Highway. In case of any change, it
shall be effected in a gradual manner.

1.4.3 Design Speed

The design speeds shall be adopted for various terrain conditions as per IRC:SP:84-
2014 are given below:

Table-1.4: Design Speeds

Cross slope of the Design Speed (kmph)

Nature of Terrain
country (per cent) Ruling Minimum

Plain & Rolling Upto 25 100 80

Mountainous & Steep Morethan 25 60 40

Short stretches (say less than 1 Km) of varying terrain in the project stretch will not
be taken into consideration while deciding the terrain classification for a given section
of Project Highway.

In general, the ruling design speed will be adopted for geometric design of the
highway. Only in exceptional circumstances, minimum design speed may be adopted
where site conditions are extremely restrictive and adequate land width is not
available. Abrupt changes in design speed will be avoided.
1.4.4 Right of Way

A minimum Right of Way (RoW) of 60m shall be made available for development of a
Highway. Since the existing RoW is 45m, It is decided to develop 4 lane within the
RoW.

1.4.5 Lane Width of Carriageway width

The standard lane width of carriageway of the Project Highway shall be 3.5 m.

1.4.6 Median

The median shall be either raised or depressed. The width of median is the distance

1-6
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

between inner edges of carriageway. The type of median shall depend upon
availability of ROW. The minimum width of median, subject to availability of ROW for
various locations, shall be as mentioned below.

Table-1.5: Width of Median

Mountainous and
Plain and Rolling terrain
Steep terrain
Type of Section
Raised* Depressed
Raised*
(m) median (m)

Open country with isolated

5.0 7.0 2.5
built up area

Built up area 2.5 NA 2.5

Approach to Grade
5.0 NA 2.5
seperated structures

*Including Kerb shyness of 0.5m on either side. In existing six lane reaches also
minimum kerb shyness of 0.5m shall be maintained.

• The median shall have suitably designed drainage system so that water does
not stagnate in the median.

• All median drains will be of RCC type. In case of depressed median, a

minimum 0.6 m width adjacent to carriageway in either direction is paved.

• As far as possible, the median will be of uniform width in a particular section

of the Project Highway. However, where changes are unavoidable, a transition
of 1 in 50 will be provided.

• In the case of depressed median, metal beam type (thrie beam-one side)
crash barriers will be provided on either side of the median.

• Suitable anti glare measures such as plastic screens shall be provided to

reduce headlight glare from opposite traffic.

1-7
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1.4.7 Width of Shoulders

The shoulder width on either side of carriageway is given below:

Table-1.6: Width of Shoulder

Width of Shoulder (m)

Plain and Rolling

Mountainous and Steep Terrain
Terrain (Either Side)
Type of Section
Hill Side Valley Side

Paved Earthen Total Earth

Paved Earthen Total Paved Total
en

Open Country
with isolated 1.5 2.0 3.5 1.5 - 1.5 1.5 1.0 2.5
built-up area

Built up area 2.0 - 2.0

Approaches to
0.25 + 0.25 +
Grade separated 2.0 - 2.0
1.5 - 1.75 1.5 - 1.75
structures
(Raised) (Raised)
Approaches to
1.5 2.0 3.5
bridges

1.4.8 Roadway width

The width of roadway shall depend upon the width of carriageway, shoulders and the
median. On horizontal curves with radius up to 300m, width of pavement and
roadway shall be increased as given below:

Table-1.7: Extra width of pavement and Roadway

Radius of Curve (m) Extra Width (m)

75 - 100 0.9

101 – 300 0.6

1-8
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1.4.9 Type of Shoulder

The type of shoulder will be as follows:

• In built up sections and approaches to the grade separated structures, the

shoulder will be paved in full width.

• In embankments with height more than 6.0m, kerb with channel shall be
provided at the end of paved shoulder to channelize the drainage as an erosion
control device.

• The composition and specification of the paved shoulder will be the same as that
of the main carriageway.

1.4.10 Cross fall

The camber or cross fall on straight sections of road carriageway and paved
shoulders shall be 2.5% for bituminous surface and 2% for CC pavement.

Cross fall shall be uni-directional for each carriageway sloping towards the outer
edge in straight stretches and towards lower edge on horizontal curves.

The crossfall for earthen shoulder is 0.5% steeper than that of the carriageway
subject to a minimum of 3.0%. On superelevated sections, earthen portion of the
shoulder on outer edge of the curve shall be provided with reverse crossfall of 0.5%
so that earth does not drain on the carriageway.

1.4.11 Geometric Design

Geometric design of the highway, shall be in accordance with IRC: 73-1980, IRC: 38-
1988 and IRC SP: 23-1983. Uniformity of design standards will be maintained
throughout the length of Project Highway. All deficiencies in the existing highway
geometry will be rectified to meet the minimum standards.

1.4.12 Super elevation

Super Elevation shall be limited to 7 percent, if radius of curve is less than desirable
minimum radius. It shall be limited to 5 percent, if radius is more than desirable
minimum.

1.4.13 Radii of Horizontal Curves

The minimum and absolute minimum radii of horizontal curves for various classes of
terrain are given below:

1-9
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Table-1.8: Minimum Radii of Horizontal Curves

Desirable Absolute
Nature of Terrain
Minimum (m) Minimum (m)

Plain and Rolling 400 250

Mountainous and
150 75
Steep

1.4.14 Sight Distance

The safe stopping sight distance and desirable minimum sight distance for four lane
divided carriageway for various design speeds are tabulated below. A minimum of
safe stopping sight distance will be adopted for the improvement of the existing
carriageway.

Table-1.9: Safe Sight Distance

Design Speed Safe Stopping Desirable minimum

(kmph) sight distance (m) sight distance (m)

100 180 360

80 130 260

60 90 180

40 45 90

1.4.15 Vertical Alignment

The vertical alignment will provide for a smooth longitudinal profile. Grade changes
will not be too frequent as to cause kinks and visual discontinuities in the profile. In
this regard, directions given in IRC: SP:23-1983 will be kept in view.

1.4.16 Gradient

The ruling and limiting gradients are tabulated below. Ruling Gradients will be
adopted as far as possible. Limiting Gradient shall be adopted in difficult situations,
and for short lengths.

1-10
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Table-1.10: Gradients

Nature of terrain Ruling gradient Limiting gradient

Plain and Rolling 2.5% 3.3%

Mountainous 5.0% 6.0%

Steep 6.0% 7.0%

Long sweeping vertical curves will be provided at all grade changes. These will be
designed as square parabolas.

Design of vertical curves and their coordination with horizontal curves, will be in
accordance with IRC: SP: 23 -1983.

1.5 IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS

Primarily, the scope of the project is widening of the existing road to four lane with
two lane service road on either side in built up areas. The project corridor is presently
having 2- lane / 4-lane configuration. The various upgradation proposal required for
enhancing the project road to 4 lane configuration as per the guidelines given in the
four laning manual (IRC:SP:84-2014) are brought out in this section.

1.5.1 Cross sections

It is proposed to widen the existing road to four lane with two lane service road on
either side in built up areas and ROW of 45m will be followed throughout the stretch.
The existing ROW varies from 30 to 45 m for the project stretch. Considering the
stretch, total nine cross sections have been proposed. Description of each type of
cross section is listed in the Table – 1.11 below.

Table – 1.11: Typical Cross Sections

TCS type Description

I Typical Cross section for Concentric Widening with 4.0 m Raised Median

II Typical Cross section for eccentric Widening(LHS) with 4.0 m Raised Median

III Typical Cross section for eccentric Widening(RHS) with 4.0 m Raised Median

IVA Typical Cross section for 4-Laning with 4.0 m Raised Median in Bypass

1-11
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

TCS type Description

IVB Typical Cross section for 4-Laning with 4.0 m Raised Median in Re alignment

Typical Cross section for 4-Lane Concentric Widening with Service Road in
V
Built up
Typical Cross Section for approaches to 6-Lane PUP, VUP with Slip Roads on
VI
Both Sides(Realignments and Bypasses)
Typical Cross Section for approaches to 6-Lane VUP, PUP with Slip Roads on
VII
Both Sides

VIII Typical Cross Section for approaches to 6-lane Animal Underpass

The typical cross sections are represented in the following figures.

1-12
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1-13
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1-14
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1.6 SERVICE ROADS/SLIP ROADS

Service road and Slip roads shall be provided in the following locations

Table 1.12: Slip Roads Details

Sl. Location of Service Right Hand side Length
No. road (RHS ) or Left (km)
Hand side (LHS)
From To (km) or Both side
(km)
Service Roads
1 87.430 88.040 Both 0.610
Slip Roads
1 47.300 48.120 Both 0.820
2 49.580 51.230 Both 1.650

1-15
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Sl. Location of Service Right Hand side Length

No. road (RHS ) or Left (km)
Hand side (LHS)
From To (km) or Both side
(km)
3 55.180 56.390 Both 1.210
4 59.510 60.870 Both 1.360
5 62.350 63.330 Both 0.980
6 68.940 69.940 Both 1.000
7 70.830 72.640 Both 1.810
8 76.580 77.580 Both 1.000
9 83.080 84.040 Both 0.960

1.7 JUNCTION IMPROVEMENTS

In addition to the above improvements, all the major and minor junctions will be
improved as per MORTH and IRC standards. As per the pedestrian movement at
junction locations, pedestrian crossings and footpaths will be provided as per
IRC:103-2012. The following Table – 1.13 & Table – 1.14 gives the list of junctions in
the existing project road.

Major Intersections:

Table – 1.13: List of Major Junctions

Sl. no Design Junction Leads to Type of

Chainage(Km) Road
Left Right
1 71.982 T Adilabad - 2 Lane

Minor Intersections:

Table – 1.14: List of Minor Junctions

Sl. no Design Junction Leads to Type of

Chainage Road
Left Right
(Km)

1 45.452 T Takkalapally 1 Lane

2 47.653 T Golleti 2 Lane
3 49.472 T Golleti 1 Lane
4 52.312 T Nakkalaguda 1 Lane
5 55.912 T Kagaz Nagar 2 Lane
6 58.082 X Rampur Gondi 1 Lane
7 59.952 T Navegaon 1 Lane

1-16
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Sl. no Design Junction Leads to Type of

Chainage Road
Left Right
(Km)

8 64.132 Y Rajura 1 Lane

9 65.067 T Idulwada 1 Lane
10 76.312 Y Indhani Bari 1 Lane
11 77.332 T Indhani 2 Lane
12 79.702 Y Khagaj Nagar 1 Lane
13 83.468 T Boranji Guda 2 Lane
14 83.910 T Pipergunj 1 Lane
15 84.802 T Neemgaon 1 Lane
16 90.208 T Sonapur 1 Lane

1.8 GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS

The curves after appropriate improvements has given in the following Table 1.15.

1-17
 HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed project report for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-
Chanda road (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in the state of Telangana.
FINAL DPR

Table – 1.15: Curve Details

Total
Super
Deflection Transition
S. no IP No Chainage Easting Northing Radius Shift (S) Speed (V) elevation HOC
angle Δ Length (Ls)
(e)
(θs+ Δc+θs)

52 43/1 42011.545 334739.93167 2121577.754007 5000 0.585 0 0.000 100 - Left

53 43/2 42467.527 334727.464929 2122033.565738 8000 0.552 0 0.000 100 - Right
54 45/1 44191.375 334696.926951 2123757.134779 600 15.842 80 0.444 100 5.000% Left
55 45/2 44640.980 334566.210927 2124188.557619 5000 0.893 0 0.000 100 - Right
56 46/1 45205.722 334410.89192 2124731.521615 12000 0.879 0 0.000 100 - Right
57 46/2 45787.504 334259.482089 2125293.260124 4000 0.829 0 0.000 100 - Right
58 47/1 46142.145 334172.148901 2125636.977112 900 8.204 65 0.196 100 4.938% Left
59 47/2 46940.296 333867.131791 2126374.807546 600 17.653 80 0.444 100 5.000% Right
60 48/1 47511.887 333819.094876 2126945.993596 10000 0.246 0 0.000 100 - Right
61 49/1 48008.948 333779.565281 2127441.477219 900 8.110 65 0.196 100 4.938% Right
62 49/2 48330.541 333799.481397 2127762.69009 800 9.758 70 0.255 100 5.000% Left
63 49/3 48894.755 333738.408544 2128323.959345 700 11.761 70 0.292 100 5.000% Left
64 50/1 49170.628 333653.123442 2128586.904443 600 12.688 80 0.444 100 5.000% Right
65 50/2 49865.238 333589.108318 2129279.193497 600 13.392 80 0.444 100 5.000% Left
66 51/1 50144.236 333499.541012 2129544.202287 700 13.686 70 0.292 100 5.000% Right
67 51/2 50307.577 333485.262099 2129707.790757 3000 0.810 0 0.000 100 - Left

1-18
 HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed project report for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-
Chanda road (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in the state of Telangana.
FINAL DPR

Total
Super
Deflection Transition
S. no IP No Chainage Easting Northing Radius Shift (S) Speed (V) elevation HOC
angle Δ Length (Ls)
(e)
(θs+ Δc+θs)

68 51/3 50889.661 333426.456442 2130286.897792 7000 0.349 0 0.000 100 - Left

69 52/1 51662.474 333343.69636 2131055.267339 1850 4.459 0 0.000 100 - Left
70 53/1 52167.935 333250.648832 2131552.157803 700 12.092 70 0.292 100 5.000% Left
71 53/2 52488.149 333126.856446 2131848.128851 600 14.918 80 0.444 100 5.000% Right
72 54/1 53384.794 333005.34675 2132737.485697 450 21.673 105 1.021 100 5.000% Left
73 55/1 54171.575 332617.304454 2133424.704852 800 13.802 70 0.255 100 5.000% Left
74 55/2 54767.234 332208.474577 2133859.258923 500 26.300 95 0.752 100 5.000% Left
75 56/1 55861.125 331179.357095 2134242.957243 450 25.101 105 1.021 100 5.000% Right
76 57/1 56436.413 330773.921081 2134656.224315 5000 1.764 0 0.000 100 - Right
77 57/2 56596.980 330665.047123 2134774.258859 5000 0.676 0 0.000 100 - Left
78 57/3 56875.709 330473.680184 2134976.875305 450 22.769 105 1.021 100 5.000% Left
79 58/1 57585.492 329822.090309 2135265.1731 400 50.654 115 1.378 100 5.000% Right
80 59/1 58063.837 329687.412134 2135751.458366 600 13.254 80 0.444 100 5.000% Left
81 59/2 58725.975 329368.744796 2136332.694864 5000 0.453 0 0.000 100 - Left
82 60/1 59203.486 329135.878577 2136749.575982 4000 1.220 0 0.000 100 - Left
83 60/2 59527.295 328971.996093 2137028.822736 450 23.257 105 1.021 100 5.000% Left
84 61/1 60358.860 328299.790706 2137523.273434 400 25.285 115 1.378 100 5.000% Right
85 62/1 61329.285 327836.887687 2138380.130042 450 24.817 105 1.021 100 5.000% Left

1-19
 HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed project report for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-
Chanda road (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in the state of Telangana.
FINAL DPR

Total
Super
Deflection Transition
S. no IP No Chainage Easting Northing Radius Shift (S) Speed (V) elevation HOC
angle Δ Length (Ls)
(e)
(θs+ Δc+θs)

86 62/2 61989.716 327305.294839 2138777.874182 400 38.234 115 1.378 100 5.000% Left
87 64/1 63024.191 326259.877001 2138751.795322 500 16.982 95 0.752 100 5.000% Right
88 64/2 63804.611 325506.77063 2138961.390768 18000 0.049 0 0.000 100 - Left
89 65/1 64436.337 324898.030862 2139130.250124 12000 0.063 0 0.000 100 - Left
90 66/1 65559.693 323815.224287 2139429.324587 700 11.521 70 0.292 100 5.000% Right
91 66/2 65812.873 323589.084543 2139544.354841 5000 0.529 0 0.000 100 - Left
92 67/1 66429.360 323037.081798 2139818.753302 400 33.186 115 1.378 100 5.000% Right
93 68/1 67684.285 322398.569667 2140907.784124 4000 0.633 0 0.000 100 - Left
94 69/1 68015.973 322227.655516 2141192.041663 900 10.633 65 0.196 100 4.938% Left
95 69/2 68595.551 321842.136598 2141625.497195 1000 10.085 60 0.150 100 4.444% Right
96 72/1 71773.790 320178.175201 2144333.859054 400 41.806 115 1.378 100 5.000% Right
97 73/1 72143.027 320246.415913 2144711.658056 500 20.066 95 0.752 100 5.000% Right
98 73/2 72502.742 320428.951173 2145023.982893 450 20.588 105 1.021 100 5.000% Left
99 73/3 72826.916 320484.021556 2145345.588337 5000 0.890 0 0.000 100 - Left
100 74/1 73340.889 320562.886787 2145853.476811 1850 3.924 0 0.000 100 - Left
101 74/2 73540.814 320579.9754 2146052.692538 450 20.476 105 1.021 100 5.000% Left
102 75/1 74149.863 320415.923718 2146641.374177 500 25.798 95 0.752 100 5.000% Right
103 75/2 74766.868 320526.196052 2147252.710092 500 17.503 95 0.752 100 5.000% Right

1-20
 HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed project report for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-
Chanda road (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in the state of Telangana.
FINAL DPR

Total
Super
Deflection Transition
S. no IP No Chainage Easting Northing Radius Shift (S) Speed (V) elevation HOC
angle Δ Length (Ls)
(e)
(θs+ Δc+θs)

104 76/1 75316.599 320782.624736 2147740.575199 1850 6.000 0 0.000 100 - Left
105 77/1 76124.274 321081.683913 2148491.033494 1850 5.082 0 0.000 100 - Left
106 77/2 76353.701 321147.433549 2148710.949399 5000 0.608 0 0.000 100 - Right
107 77/3 76634.320 321230.664257 2148978.943343 2000 3.977 0 0.000 100 - Right
108 77/4 76996.143 321361.697367 2149316.235786 450 21.320 105 1.021 100 5.000% Right
109 78/1 77293.056 321564.045622 2149536.679529 1000 6.800 60 0.150 100 4.444% Right
110 78/2 77654.262 321838.189428 2149772.07161 450 23.411 105 1.021 100 5.000% Right
111 79/1 78389.567 322543.319815 2149990.896141 800 33.413 70 0.255 100 5.000% Left
112 79/2 78942.669 322902.738932 2150429.292976 400 29.162 115 1.378 100 5.000% Left
113 80/1 79312.062 322968.981952 2150797.973992 8000 0.511 0 0.000 100 - Right
114 80/2 79805.453 323060.566878 2151282.791406 10000 0.253 0 0.000 100 - Left
115 81/1 80459.997 323179.226964 2151926.490238 8000 0.639 0 0.000 100 - Left
116 81/2 80598.187 323202.762706 2152062.661396 1850 3.190 0 0.000 100 - Right
117 81/3 80836.647 323256.393807 2152295.036365 1000 8.377 60 0.150 100 4.444% Right
118 82/1 81363.632 323448.552232 2152786.04349 2000 6.316 0 0.000 100 - Left
119 82/2 81983.560 323609.660745 2153384.903379 5000 0.681 0 0.000 100 - Left
120 83/1 82333.264 323696.491715 2153723.655975 2300 9.749 0 0.000 100 - Left
121 84/1 83117.999 323759.888764 2154506.771458 800 11.006 70 0.255 100 5.000% Right

1-21
 HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed project report for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-
Chanda road (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in the state of Telangana.
FINAL DPR

Total
Super
Deflection Transition
S. no IP No Chainage Easting Northing Radius Shift (S) Speed (V) elevation HOC
angle Δ Length (Ls)
(e)
(θs+ Δc+θs)

122 84/2 83630.103 323898.036881 2155000.43373 1850 4.366 0 0.000 100 - Left
123 85/1 84107.108 323991.25153 2155468.30111 360 17.589 60 0.417 80 5.000% Left
124 85/2 84576.646 323939.446271 2155935.970448 600 17.174 80 0.444 100 5.000% Right
125 86/1 85535.640 324120.28281 2156879.274249 1000 8.740 60 0.150 100 4.444% Right
126 87/1 86396.448 324409.037368 2157690.546703 1850 2.939 0 0.000 100 - Right
127 87/2 86595.826 324485.44415 2157874.72504 5000 0.506 0 0.000 100 - Left
128 87/3 86854.577 324582.477918 2158114.593784 3000 1.745 0 0.000 100 - Left
129 88/1 87090.079 324664.107381 2158335.504689 2500 3.085 0 0.000 100 - Right
130 88/2 87293.857 324744.933936 2158522.600061 1500 3.656 40 0.044 100 2.963% Left
131 88/3 87615.491 324853.415967 2158825.425674 3000 0.539 0 0.000 100 - Left
132 89/1 88071.100 325003.026684 2159255.771418 1850 3.478 0 0.000 100 - Right
133 89/2 88439.637 325144.95048 2159595.92184 1850 3.464 0 0.000 100 - Left
134 90/1 89109.404 325365.039758 2160228.501187 450 29.550 105 1.021 100 5.000% Right
135 90/2 89978.956 326022.958312 2160805.831606 400 31.577 115 1.378 100 5.000% Left
136 91/1 90378.864 326142.843004 2161194.143938 600 16.971 80 0.444 100 5.000% Right
137 91/2 90811.763 326386.513782 2161553.670936 500 29.644 95 0.752 100 5.000% Left
138 92/1 91331.249 326427.622017 2162077.818785 400 32.731 115 1.378 100 5.000% Left
139 92/2 91919.985 326145.609089 2162602.780413 500 18.053 95 0.752 100 5.000% Right

1-22
 HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed project report for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-
Chanda road (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in the state of Telangana.
FINAL DPR

Total
Super
Deflection Transition
S. no IP No Chainage Easting Northing Radius Shift (S) Speed (V) elevation HOC
angle Δ Length (Ls)
(e)
(θs+ Δc+θs)

140 93/1 92168.736 326101.3192 2162849.120362 700 11.898 70 0.292 100 5.000% Left
141 93/2 92363.046 326028.027285 2163029.708787 2000 0.820 0 0.000 100 - Right
142 93/3 92554.803 325958.464633 2163208.404429 3000 0.709 0 0.000 100 - Left
143 93/4 92829.905 325855.520831 2163463.471909 400 26.698 115 1.378 100 5.000% Right
144 94/1 93622.622 325921.062223 2164257.548065 700 33.536 70 0.292 100 5.000% Right
145 95/1 94348.713 326378.204475 2164837.340476 400 34.435 115 1.378 100 5.000% Left

1-23
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1.9 PROPOSED BYPASSES

The Project stretch starts from Repallewad to Maharashtra border is proposed to be

4-laning of existing road.The major built-up locations along the stretch are Tandur,
Rebbana, Asifabad and Wankidi. Project road passes through some congested
locations and built-up areas which may require further study of alternative
alignment/Bypasses. Identified town, which require bypass is Asifabad.

Asifabad Bypass

Asifabad is the second most important town in the entire stretch. The existing road
which is passing through Asifabad starts from Km 315.500 to Km 318.200. Asifabad
is full of built up area consisting of residential and commercial buildings. There is lot of
congestion within the city due to local traffic and commercial activities are being taken
place on adjacent to road. The geometrics and condition of existing road in Asifabad
is poor and available RoW is 20-40m. Congestion of traffic is observed due to presence
of industries on surrounding places of the Asifabad and local traffic generating and
terminating in these industries, mainly the cotton industries. To acquire the land in
Asifabad, huge demolition of structures will be needed. Considering above constraints
Bypass is proposed around the existing habitant which is of length 3 km from Km.
304.440 to Km. 307. 800.

1.10 EXISTING STRUCTURE AND IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS

1.10.1 Existing Structures

The Structures inventory has been prepared based on the condition survey, which
consists of identification of physical features of each structure such as name,
location, technical data (foundation, substructure and superstructure type) length,
type of material, carriageway width, type of structure, etc.

The survey revealed that there are altogether 30 Minor bridges, 2 Major bridges, 24
Slab culverts and 56 Pipe Culverts were observed.

Table – 1.16: List of Existing Structures

Existing Structures as per

S.No Type of Structure
Inventory

1 Major Bridges 2

1-24
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Existing Structures as per

S.No Type of Structure
Inventory

2 Minor Bridges 30

3
Culverts 80

112
Total

1.10.1.1 GENERAL CONDITION OF STRUCTURES

1. Cross drainage structures

The following types of distress have been observed during visual inspection in the
cross drainage structures:

• Exposure of reinforcement, Corroded reinforcement and cracks in RCC

components.

• Choked drainage spouts.

• Parapet / RCC railings either broken or cracked in few cases.

1. Pitching failure and sliding of embankment slopes along approaches.

2. Buried / filled up expansion joints.

3. Missing parapet in culvert & bridges.

2. Bridges

The condition of the following components is observed:

a) Bearings, where accessible.

b) Expansion joints.

c) Back wall and bearing shelf of piers & abutments.

d) Drainage system of decks.

e) Railings / Parapet.

f) Footpaths and kerb.

g) Wearing coat.

h) Apron flooring, cut-off walls, wing walls etc

i) Protection work, if provided.

1-25
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

j) Bridge Decks.

k) Embankment Slopes along approaches.

a)Concrete elements (RCC)

1. Spalling & honeycombing.

2. Exposed or Corroded Reinforcement at the edges of solid slab superstructure.

3. Lack of expansion joints or nonfunctioning expansion joints.

4. Cracks in retaining wall and abutment wall due to blockage of expansion gaps.

5. Railings/Parapet walls either broken or cracked.

6. Settlement of approach slabs.

b) Masonry Elements

• Lateral and diagonal cracks.

• Cracks in Abutment, Parapet wall & Return walls.

• Loosening of mortar at joints.

• Longitudinal joints between concrete and masonry where widening has

already been done, are not water proofed.

3. Flyover

Type of Structure Vertical

Deck
Chainage Span(m) Sub Super Clearance(
Width(m)
Structure Structure m)

-Nil-

4. Major Bridges

There are 2 Major bridges in the project stretch

Type of Structure Vertical

Deck
Chainage Span(m) Sub Super Clearance(
Width(m)
Structure Structure m)

315+080 9*20(c/c) RCC T Girder RCC T Pier 8 10.8

Stone
Stone
322+320 7*14(c/c) Masonry 6.5 14
Masonry Pier
Arch Bridge

1-26
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

5. Minor Bridges

There are 30 Minor Bridges in the Project Stretch

Span Type of Structure

S. Existing Arrangement
Width Sub Super
No. Chainage No. x Span Foundation
(m) Structure Structure
(Km) (C/C) (m)

SM Arch
PCC Pier,
widened
1 289.450 13.00 3 x 2.00 Not Visible PCC
with RCC
abutment
Slab
PCC Pier,
RCC T
2 295.250 8.50 3 x 17.00 Not Visible PCC
Girder
abutment
SM Arch
PCC Pier,
widened
3 298.330 13.00 3 x 2.00 Not Visible PCC
with RCC
abutment
Slab
PCC Pier,
RCC Solid
4 300.050 12.00 2 x 6.50 Not Visible PCC
slab
abutment
Parabolic
5 301.015 6.50 3 x 3.70 Not Visible SM Pier arch stone
masonry
PCC Pier,
1 x 17.10+1 x RCC T
6 303.860 8.50 Not Visible PCC
19.30 Girder
abutment
PCC Pier,
RCC Solid
7 305.120 12.00 2 x 5.40 Not Visible PCC
slab
abutment
SM Arch
PCC Pier,
widened
8 306.400 13.00 3 x 3.50 Not Visible PCC
with RCC
abutment
Slab
RCC Solid
9 308.380 8.80 4 x 7.00 Not Visible SM Pier
slab
SM Arch
PCC Pier,
widened
10 310.770 13.00 3 x 3.60 OPEN PCC
with RCC
abutment
Slab
SM Arch
widened
11 314.385 13.00 1 x 5.50 - -
with RCC
Slab
12 319.850 12.90 1 x 2.00 - - SM Arch

1-27
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Span Type of Structure

S. Existing Arrangement
Width Sub Super
No. Chainage No. x Span Foundation
(m) Structure Structure
(Km) (C/C) (m)

widened
with RCC
Slab
"14.50
(Skew)
PCC RCC Solid
13 320.380 11.90 1 x 12.50 Not Visible
abutment slab
(Norm
al)"
SM Arch
widened
14 324.190 12.00 1 x 2.00 - -
with RCC
Slab
RCC Solid
15 325.300 8.40 3 x 7.40 Not Visible SM Pier
slab
RCC Solid
16 328.790 12.00 2 x 7.40 Not Visible RCC Pier
slab
SM Arch
PCC Pier,
widened
17 329.215 12.20 2 x 3.00 Not Visible PCC
with RCC
abutment
Slab
RCC Pier,
RCC Solid
18 330.420 12.00 2 x 8.70 Not Visible RCC
slab
abutment
Stone
SM Pier, SM Masonry
19 331.760 6.50 4 x 9.50 OPEN
abutment Parabolic
Arch
PCC Pier,
RCC Solid
20 333.700 12.10 2 x 9.20 Not Visible PCC
slab
abutment
SM Arch
PCC Pier,
widened
21 335.810 13.10 3 x 2.00 Not Visible PCC
with RCC
abutment
Slab
SM Arch
widened
22 336.760 12.30 1 x 2.50 - -
with RCC
Slab
SM Arch
widened
23 336.990 12.00 1 x 2.00 - -
with RCC
Slab

1-28
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

Span Type of Structure

S. Existing Arrangement
Width Sub Super
No. Chainage No. x Span Foundation
(m) Structure Structure
(Km) (C/C) (m)

SM Arch
widened
24 337.430 12.00 1 x 1.70 - -
with RCC
Slab
PCC RCC Solid
25 337.900 12.00 1 x 10.40 Not Visible
abutment slab
SM Arch
widened
26 338.900 12.20 1 x 1.60 - -
with RCC
Slab
SM Arch
widened
27 339.700 13.00 1 x 1.70 - -
with RCC
Slab
SM Arch
PCC Pier,
widened
28 340.550 13.00 2 x 3.70 Not Visible SM
with RCC
abutment
Slab
SM Arch
widened
29 340.900 12.30 1 x 1.60 - -
with RCC
Slab
"13.70
SM Arch
(Skew)
widened
30 341.855 9.90 1 x 0.80 - -
with RCC
(Norm
Slab
al)"

1.10.2 Improvement of Structures

Recommendation of structure improvements, including widening, repair and
reconstruction / new construction of bridges, other cross drainage structures and the
proposals can be as per Bridge Design report. Where Minor bridges are proposed
to be widened, it is recommended that the existing railing to be replaced with RCC
crash barrier by chipping the edge of deck and exposing the reinforcement and then
casting the RCC crash barrier.

Widening of existing pipe culverts smaller than 900 mm shall be replaced with 1200
mm dia Pipe Culverts. Existing 900 mm dia pipe culverts can be widened using 900
mm dia pipes.

1-29
 Feasibility study and Preparation of Detailed Project Report
HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT
for four laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road
FINAL DPR
Package-II (Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in
the state of Telangana.

1.11 REHABILITATION SCHEME FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES

Rehabilitation measures for existing bridges & other structures are described briefly
below:
The basic measures to be taken into account are:

• Repair of existing scour protection/bed protection or slope protection

(wherever necessary).
• Replace existing wearing coat on all structures
• Replace expansion joints in all bridges.
• Replace bearings for bridges.
• Repair corroded reinforcement.
• Repair of cracks by epoxy injection – RCC elements.
• Repair of cracks by PMC mortar – Stone masonry elements.

1-30