Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Convoy - 1 Offshore Transportation Procedure Pile Guide Frame, Piles and Jacket Hook-Up Items
Convoy - 1 Offshore Transportation Procedure Pile Guide Frame, Piles and Jacket Hook-Up Items
Convoy - 1 Offshore Transportation Procedure Pile Guide Frame, Piles and Jacket Hook-Up Items
ZOHR FIELD
DEVELOPMENT 1933C4DCCB00004
PROJECT Job N.
Contractor logo and business name Sub-Contractor logo and business name Contractor Document ID
Contract N.
Project / Initiative name Zohr Field Development Project – Zohr Central Control Platform – T&I
Document Title CONVOY – 1 OFFSHORE TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURE
This document describes the technical offshore transportation procedure of the new Zohr central
ABSTRACT
control offshore platform structures in convoy – 1 (Pile Guide Frame, piles and jacket hook up items)
on board PMS 46 safely from PETROJET yard jetty in El maadia to the installation site in Zohr field
through the afore mentioned scope of work.
Document Verification
E.Elsaid 29/03/2017
Review
Project Team
REVISION LIST
HOLD RECORD
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
ZOHR Development Project consists in the development of a gas field called Zohr located in the Shorouk
Offshore Block. Shorouk Block is located in East Mediterranean Basin (East Nile Delta).
Shorouk Block was awarded in early 2013 as the result of 2012 EGAS Bid Round. The Concession
Agreement has been ratified in January 30th 2014 with IEOC as operator with 100% of share. The total
Block area is 3765 sq km, in a water depth of 1200-1700 m and around 100-200 km far from the shore line.
(see figure 1)
Zohr development concept envisages a subsea deep water architecture with production directly routed to
shore by means of dedicated pipelines. The wells will be controlled via main long-distance umbilicals from a
new shallow water platform that will be installed to be used as a control platform. Infield umbilicals will be
used to divert the control to each well.
Zohr gas production will be treated by new onshore gas plants in order to remove acid components.
• Additional 14 subsea wells tied back to the new treatment onshore plant to reach the gas plateau of
2,700 MMSCFD.
• Subsea control system via umbilicals located on a new platform, located not far from the existing
platform used for Accelerated Start up or on the Central Control Platform that is a new platform
installed since the accelerated start up phase to hoist the equipment required for all the Zohr project
phases.
• 2 additional pipelines (26” OD) for the gas production connected directly to new dedicated treatment
onshore plants.
• New dedicated pipelines for hydrate inhibitor (MEG or DEG) from onshore to field wells.
• New dedicated service line for intervention, well testing, hydrate remediation, from onshore.
• Additional 5 onshore process trains of 350 Mscf/d capacity each.
Plateau duration extension by means of production in low pressure mode (additional wells + facilities) is also
considered when the reservoir pressure will decrease. The proposed development scheme includes the
following facilities:
• Additional 5 subsea wells tied back to the new treatment onshore plant
• Additional 3 pipelines (26”) for the gas production connected directly to new dedicated treatment
onshore plants
• An onshore compression system will be necessary to feed the gas treatment unit, at new lower
operating pressure (preliminary 25 barg).
Final size and number of lines needed for full field ramp up and the plateau extension will be confirmed
during engineering studies and after completion of the appraisal campaign. The current reservoir model
indicates that all the above is expected to be needed from 2030. The field production performances during
the first years of production will help to better design the plateau extension phase.
Company intends to carry out the following activities, inherent to the ZOHR Development Project:
The CCP is designed as an unmanned remote control facility, to be installed in the Mediterranean Sea
offshore Egypt in a water depth of 85 m (LAT), in the Shorouk Offshore Block. Shorouk Block is located in
East Mediterranean Basin (East Nile Delta).
Contractor scope of work will mainly consists of the transportation and installation of the following items:
a) Transportation design.
b) Installation engineering.
c) Design of rigging and installation aids including slings, shackles and other temporary structures for
installation purpose to be fabricated and installed on yard (e.g.: Rigging platforms, buoyancy tanks
removal aids/guides supports, padeyes, ILT etc.).
d) Supply of rigging system (slings, shackles, ILT and ILT’s receptacle and other certified lifting tools).
e) Supply of all services, activities and materials for transportation purpose (excluding grillage and sea
fastening).
f) Transportation of PGF and piles.
g) Offshore installation of PGF and Piles (including spool pieces).
h) PGF retrieval and transportation at yard.
i) Piles positioning survey and metrology.
a) Transportation design
b) Installation engineering
c) Design of rigging and installation aids including slings, shackles and other temporary structures for
installation purpose to be fabricated and installed on yard (e.g.: Rigging platforms, buoyancy tank
removal aids/guides supports, padeyes, etc.)
d) Supply of rigging system (slings, shackles, and other certified lifting tools)
e) Supply of all services, activities and materials for transportation purpose (excluding grillage and
seafastening)
f) Transportation of Jacket and appurtenances (boat landings, burge bumpers, caisson, etc.)
g) Offshore installation of Jacket and appurtenances (including the stairs connecting boat landings and top
of jacket walkway)
3: CCP Topside:
a) Transportation design
b) Installation engineering
c) Design of rigging and installation aids including slings, shackles, spreader bar (if any) and other
temporary structures for installation purpose to be fabricated and installed on yard (e.g.: Rigging
platforms, bumpers & guides, padeyes, etc.)
d) Supply of rigging system (slings, shackles, and other certified lifting tools)
e) Supply of all services, activities and materials for transportation purpose (excluding grillage and
seafastening)
f) Transportation of CCP Topside (integrated deck including flare, crane, helideck, etc.)
g) Offshore installation of Topside (including welding to jacket legs)
h) Execution of main structural hook-up activities including:
This document describes the technical offshore transportation procedure of the new Zohr central control
offshore platform structures in convoy – 1 (Pile Guide Frame, piles and jacket hook up items) on board PMS
46 safely from PETROJET yard jetty in El maadia to the installation site in Zohr field through the afore
mentioned scope of work.
The purpose of the document is to present the required transportation analysis calculations of cargo barge
PMS 46 to transport the required structures as follows:
This document will serve as a guideline for field personnel and is subject to minor changes to accommodate
site conditions and any changes for structures design and weights; in consultation with/and after approval
from MWS and Company Representative.
• The barge drafts are not as per the calculations, therefore ballast changes will be applied and
submitted to MWS for review / approval.
• Additional cargo added to the trip.
This report presents the results of transportation analysis which aims to demonstrate the adequacy of PMS
46 deck cargo barge for the marine transportation of Zohr platform structures in convoy – 1 (Pile Guide
Frame, piles and jacket hook up items).
As far as the transportation analysis is concerned, it can be concluded that the proposed cargo barge
satisfies all the Noble Denton requirements, in particular:
• Bollard Pull;
• Longitudinal Strength.
A suitable barge loading condition, mean draught of 3.6 m with a trim by stern of 0.50 degrees (0.80 m), has
been selected for the transportation arrangement.
For the intact condition, the static angle of inclination induced by a 52 m/s wind is 0.36 degrees, the
calculated GM is 15 m while the stability range is 70 degrees and the wind area ratio at the second intercept
is 6.40. Therefore, all the stability requirements in intact condition are satisfied.
For damaged condition, all the compartments have been considered damaged two by two, the minimum
calculated GM is 12.65 m while the stability range is 64 degrees and the wind area ratio at the second
intercept is 10.5. Therefore, all the stability requirements in damaged conditions are satisfied.
The barge longitudinal strength checks, in still water condition. The maximum barge shear force and bending
moments are within the allowable values and are therefore acceptable.
4.1 Definitions
4.2 Abbreviations
B Ship breadth
BP Bollard Pull
D Ship depth
DP Dynamic Positioning
EL. Elevation
GZ Righting arm
The inclination of the ship in the transverse direction about
Heel
centre of floatation.
Hs Significant Wave Height
M Meter
ND Noble Denton
TBC To Be Confirmed
WD Water depth
∆ Ship displacement
Intact Stability (IS) Code - Intact Stability for All Types of Ships Covered by
[62] N/A
IMO Instruments. Resolution A.749 (18) - Amended by MSC.75 (69)
[63] N/A DNV Rules for Planning and Execution of Marine Operations
6.1 General
“Transportation” covers the period when the barge is being towed, with its cargo, from the fabrication yard to
the installation site.
The end of the transportation period coincides with the handover of the transportation barge and relevant
cargo, at installation site, to the Crane Vessel Superintendent.
• Transportation is defined as starting when all preparations for the sail away have been completed,
the Certificate of Approval has been issued, and the removal of mooring lines has started.
• Transportation is defined as being completed when the towage or transportation has arrived at a
sheltered location or installation barge and the approved tug has been disconnected.
Breadth 27.432 m
Depth 6.096 m
The centre of gravity coordinates are referred to the barge reference system with its origin at the midship.
Tank Name Weight (MT) LCG (m) TCG (m) VCG (m)
TANK 5W.P 715.77 33.893a 10.287p 3.306
TANK 5W.S 715.77 33.893a 10.287s 3.306
TANK 5C.P 436.21 38.355a 3.429p 3.562
TANK 5C.S 420.86 38.355a 3.429s 3.562
TANK 4W.P 872 14.859a 10.287p 3.048
TANK 4W.S 872 14.859a 10.287s 3.048
TANK 4C.P 872 14.859a 3.429p 3.048
TANK 4C.S 872 14.860a 3.428s 3.048
TANK 3W.P 872 5.715f 10.287p 3.048
TANK 3W.S 872 5.715f 10.287s 3.048
TANK 3C.P 872 5.715f 3.429p 3.048
TANK 3C.S 872 5.715f 3.429s 3.048
TANK 2W.P 872 26.289f 10.287p 3.048
TANK 2W.S 872 26.289f 10.287s 3.048
TANK 2C.P 872 26.289f 3.429p 3.048
TANK 2C.S 872 26.289f 3.429s 3.048
TANK 1W.P 264 40.364f 10.287p 4.086
TANK 1W.S 264 40.364f 10.287s 4.086
TANK 1C.P 264 40.364f 3.429p 4.086
TANK 1C.S 264 40.364f 3.429s 4.086
For more details and specifications, please refer to marine vessels specifications and capacity plan in
ANNEX 7.
The tug size and bollard pull shall be determined based on the material barge relevant loading condition, loaded
structures to be transported and envireonmental conditions.
The tugs shall also be equipped with, as a minimum, the following navigational equipment:
• Compass - magnetic and gyroscopic
• Rudder telemeter
• Remote control of engine
• Radar
• Radio communication HF, SSB & VHF
• Echo sounder
• Weather facsimile and GPS
• Updated charts for the route and field.
The loaded material barge shall be towed by a tug boat has a BP not to be less than the Calculated bollard pulls
value.
Sea King AHTS or VOS APHRODITE or VOS TRITON AHTS will tow the deck cargo barge PMS 46 from
PETROJET yard jetty in Maadia to Zohr CCP installation location.
Draft 3.6 m Deck Cargo 500 tonnes Deck Cargo 500 tonnes
Freeboard 0.8 m Bollard Pull 67.6 tonnes Bollard Pull 69.9 tonnes
For more details and specifications, please refer to towing vessel specifications in ANNEX 7.
Deck cargo barge will be positioned and fastened in convoy “1” on board PMS 46 deck in accordance with
section 7.1 requirements. A typical arrangement of the cargo as loaded on the barge deck is shown in the
following table.
Skid Shoes 18
The above are subject to changes to satisfy project requirements and the overall project schedule.
The particular jacket configuration without mud mats and piles sleeves requires the fabrication of a suitable
structure to be used for guiding the piles during the installation phase.
The Pile Guide Frame is a framed structure with four sleeves, disposed on a 34 x 34 m grid, with dimensions
suitable for guiding the 84” diameter piles.
The guide frame structure will be lowered onto sea bed by the HLV and is provided with four supporting legs
ending with adequate mud-mats. The legs can be extended and retracted by four remotely operated
hydraulic jacks.
The legs incorporate a jacking system to enable the accurate levelling of the guide frame and ensure the
consequent verticality of the foundation piles. In this way the guide frame level can be adjusted even during
the pile installation operation to recover any possible out of level.
Each leg can be extended for a total length of 3 m in order to compensate any out of level of the sea bed and
any possible settlement.
The three meters of stroke are obtained by operating the four hydraulic jacks connected to the top of the
guide frame legs. Once positioned on target position the PGF will remain in place until the piles are driven to
the target penetration through PGF sleeves. To facilitate the guide frame retrieval the upper section of the
pile protruding from seabed is 60” diameter.
The template will be provided with four padeyes and one bucket for the internal lifting tool to be used for
lifting, lowering and retrieval operations. The bucket in rest condition will temporarly be positioned in a
suitable support.
Weight Xg Yg Zg
(t) (mm) (mm) (mm)
390.5 28557 0 19563
The foundation system consists in four pin/docking piles installed through the PGF sleeves by using a crane
vessel which will be removed upon the completion of their installation.
The make-up of each pile foresees two section jointed with a transitional cone in order to pass the diameter from
84’’ of the bottom section to 60’’ of the upper section.
The piles OD is 2132.6 mm (84”) for the embedded part and is reduced to 1524 mm (60”) in the part that remains
above the mud line, inside the jacket legs. The pile reduction in the upper part is needed for an easier retrieving
of the guide frame and also to minimize the jacket legs enlargement.
To compensate possible pile head out of level, pile spool pieces will be cut to the required length on board of
HLV and will be placed on top of the piles.
Two boat landings, four barge bumpers and one 65" (ID) sump caisson will be installed offshore on the platform
North (geographic East) and South (geographic West) sides.
• The boat landings on Row 1 and Row 2, lift weight about 20.7 t, are approx. 13 m long and extends
approx. 3.0 m from jacket legs centerlines.
• The barge bumpers, lift weight about 6.2 t each, will be positioned on each side of each boat landing,
at approx. 3.0 m from jacket legs centerlines (axis-axis). Shock cells located between the boat
bumpers and jacket legs will be adopted for absorbing the kinetic energy due to impact of a berthing
vessel.
The sequence below shall be followed during preparing the layout arrangement of the structures to be loaded on
board PMS 46:
1. Review the approved installation schedule to select the structures to be loaded for the trip.
2. Distribute the structures on the material barge deck to suite the following.
• Minimum trim and heel before applying ballast study.
• Maximum GZ for stability of the trip complying with IMO & GL-ND criteria.
• Minimum values of shear forces and bending moments for longitudinal strength, these values
which will be compared to the allowable still water stresses.
• Marine operation during installation concerning the crane characteristics of the installation barge.
• Other operations such as load out sequence, skid beams and grillage installation and sea
fastening.
The Layout arrangement for the afore mentioned cargos onboard PMS 46 are presented by layout
arrangement drawing in ANNEX 1.
The following considerations have to be considered during preparation of the ballast plan:
• The barge should have sufficient free board considering environmental effects to any open
compartment, where flooding may occur.
• Slack tanks should be avoided; full tanks and empty tanks are recommended.
• PMS 46 to be trimmed minimum as per above In order to avoid slamming and improve sea
keeping by achieve optimum towing conditions that will minimize pounding of the barge bow
plating in sea
• For barges with a load line certificate, the draught shall never exceed the appropriate load line
draught. The draught should be small enough to give adequate freeboard and stability, and large
enough to reduce motions and slamming. Typically, for barge towages, it will be between 35%
and 60% of hull depth, which is usually significantly less than the load-line draught.
PMS 46 should be ballasted to minimum 0.8 m trim by stern and minimum 2.4 m draught
forward as per GL – ND guidelines for marine transportation.
This document is property of Petrobel.
It shall neither be shown to Third Parties nor used for purposes other than those for which it has been sent.
Sheet of Sheets
Company Document ID Contractor Document ID 25 / 50
• Minimise partially filled compartments where the net volume for each compartment is equal to the
98% of the geometric volume of the compartment itself. This assumption is made to take into
account the structural elements inside the tank. Once that the net volume is calculated, the following
constraints are imposed:
− “full compartment” means the maximum floodable volume is equal to 98.9% of the net volume.
− “void compartment” means residual ballast is equal to 30 cm sounding.
7.3.1 General
• Vessel’s stability is carried out in accordance with IMO regulations and GL Noble Denton
guidelines for marine transportation.
• After the optimum towing ballast plan is prepared, this ballast plan should be checked in order to
satisfy the stability criteria.
• The stability check had been performed using AUTO-HYDRO PRO Software based on the
approved barge stability booklet.
• The following cases have been considered in the stability check:
The criteria which considered in the stability check for intact stabilityin IMO code:
1. The area under the righting lever curve up to the angle of maximum righting lever should not be less
than 0.08 meter–radians.
2. The static angle of heel due to a uniformly distributed wind load of 540 Pa (wind speed 30 m/s)
should not exceed an angle corresponding to half the freeboard for the relevant loading condition,
where the lever of wind heeling moment is measured from the centroid of the windage area to half
the draft.
3. The minimum range of stability should be:
The range of intact static stability, defined as the range between 0° degrees heel or trim and the angle at
which the righting arm (GZ) becomes negative, shall be not less than 36°.
The metacentric height (GM) shall be positive throughout the range above specified. The initial metacentric
height GM0, should be adequate to provide positive control with a margin for computational inaccuracy. A
GM0 of around 1.0 m is normally required, and in any case shall not be less than 0.15 m.
For intact condition, the area under the righting moment curve shall be not less than 40% in excess of the
area under wind overturning arm curve. The areas shall be bounded by a 0° heel or trim, and the second
intercept of the righting and wind overturning arm curves, or down-flooding angle, whichever is less.
The wind speed used for intact wind overturning calculations shall be 52 m/s.
The barge is required to have positive stability about any horizontal axis with damage caused by an assumed
minimum penetration of 1.5 m from any external plating, between effective watertight bulkheads,
all the compartments have to be considered damaged two by two.
For damaged condition, the area under the righting moment curve shall be not less than 40% in excess of
the area under wind overturning arm curve. The areas shall be bounded by the angle of loll, and the second
intercept of the righting and wind overturning arm curves, or down-flooding angle, whichever is less.
The wind velocity used for overturning moment calculations in the damage condition shall be 26 m/s (50
knots) at a reference height of 10 m above sea level or the wind used for the intact calculation if less. It shall
be applied in the most criticaldirection.
Bollard pull is determined from minimum towline pull required (TPR) considering wave, current and wind forces
applied to the loaded barge. The bollard pull shall be sufficient to maintain zero forward speed against the
following acting simultaneously.
In order to calculate TPR, loads from wave, wind and current are computed as per the following formula.
TPR = FD + FW + FC
where:
FC current force acting on the barge area below the still water plane;
FW wind force acting on the barge area above the still water plane;
FD mean longitudinal drift force due to waves.
The wave drift force acting on the barge has been calculated according to the following formula (DNV, Planning
and Execution of marine Operations, 1996:
𝐵 (0.52 𝐿 − 13)
𝐹𝐷 = 𝐻𝑆2 ∙ ∙ (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠)
𝐿 9.81
where:
𝐻𝑆 significant wave height in (m).
[
2. Wind force
The wind force acting on the cargo barge system has been calculated according to the following formula (from
API RP 2SK)
1
𝐹𝑊 = ∙ ρ AIR ∙ CS ∙ C H ∙ AW ∙ 𝑉𝑤2 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠)
2𝑔
Where:
-3 3
ρAIR air density, it is assumed to be 1.2224× 10 t/m
Ch height coefficient according to the water level
Cs shape coefficient (1.0 for the hull, 0.5 for cylindrical shapes and 1.5 for isolated structural shapes).
2
A wind vertical projected area of each surface exposed to the wind (m )
V wind wind speed (m/s)
3. Current force
The current force acting on the cargo barge system has been calculated according to the following formula (from
API RP 2SK).
1
𝐹𝐶 = ∙ CCX ∙ 𝑆 ∙ 𝑉𝑐2 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠)
𝑔
Where:
CCX Current Force Coefficient on the bow 2.89
S Wetted Surface of the Hull (m2)
V Current design Current Speed (m/s)
TPR (effective continuous bollard pull) shall be related to the continuous static bollard pull of the tug’s
proposed (BP) by:
T
TPR = ∑ BP ⋅ e
100
Where:
Te the tug efficiency in the sea conditions considered %
(BP x Te/100) is the contribution to TPR of each tug
Σ means the aggregate of all tugs assumed to contribute
(Te) depends on the size and configuration of the tug, the sea state considered and the towing speed
achieved.
In the absence of alternative information, Te may be estimated for good ocean-going tugs according to the
following equation:
Where:
LOA Towing Vessel Length Over All in (m) (using 45 for LOAs ≥ 45 m).
BP Static continuous bollard pull in tonnes (with BP > 20 tonnes & 100 for BP >100 tonnes).
Hs Significant wave height (with 1 ≤ Hs ≤ 5).
Also the tugs efficiency could be obtained from the following graph for tugs of LOA ≥ 45 m in different
significant wave heights up to 5 m.
Figure 3: Tug efficiencies in various wave heights (tug LOA > 45m)
TPR (effective continuous bollard pull) could be also obtained from the following graph
The resulting effective bollard pull in different wave heights and tug LOAs of > 45 m and 20 m is shown in
following Figure:
Figure 4: Effective Bollard Pull in Different Wave Heights for Tug LOA = 20 m and > 45 m
The Effective Continuous Bollard Pull (TPR) should be higher than the Calculated Towline Pull Required
(TPRq).
According to GL ND guidelines for marine transportation 0030 (rev. 6) – Section (12.2), Bollard Pull
Requirements:
Since the duration of the transportation is less than 24 hours, this transportation has been classed as staged
tow or transportation.
The minimum Towline Pull Required (TPR) should be computed for zero forward speed against the following
acting simultaneously.
The Meteorological Criteria for Calculating TPR (Calculated Towline Pull Required) has been set to staged
tow where the following design environmental criteria acting simultaneously, may be used:
• 3.0 m significant sea state,
• 1 hour design wind speed (20 m/s), and
• 0.5 m/s current speed.
The total weight of a floating vessel must be supported by an equal opposite force (Buoyancy force).
The loads which the ship is subjected to are Vertical Shear Force and Longitudinal Bending Moment in Still
Water.
Due to unevenly distributed weight owing to both cargo distribution and structural distribution. The buoyancy
distribution is also non uniform since the underwater sectional area is not constant along the length.
Total weight and total buoyancy are of course balanced, but at each section there will be a resultant force or
load.
Figure 5: Vertical Shear Force and Longitudinal Bending Moment in Still Water
When a ship is in a seaway the waves with their troughs and crests produce a greater variation in the
buoyant forces and therefore can increase the bending moment, vertical shear force, and stresses.
Figure 6: Vertical Shear Force and Longitudinal Bending Moment Due to Wave
The material barge’s longitudinal strength will be checked by calculating max expected bending moment
(hogging or sagging) and also the max expected shear force and comparing the two values with the
allowable values calculated from classification society rules.
WATER BALLAST
Loading Summary
Floating Status
Initial
Case Heel Trim Displ. GM XG YG ZG XB YB ZB
[deg] [deg] [t] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m]
Dmg_1WP_1CP 0.56s 0.70a 7965.2 15.225 3.114a 0.380s 4.599 3.150a 0.478s 1.853
Dmg_1CP_1CS 0.01s 0.24a 8218.1 15.640 1.734a 0.040s 4.584 1.756a 0.000 1.899
Dmg_1CS_1WS 0.25p 0.69a 7965.2 15.211 3.113a 0.293p 4.599 3.147a 0.376p 1.852
Dmg_1WS_2WS 0.97s 0.28a 7923.4 13.481 3.224a 0.334p 4.623 3.240a 0.217p 1.947
Dmg_2WS_3WS 0.01s 0.13a 7309.8 12.650 2.752a 1.237p 4.791 2.756a 1.134p 1.914
Dmg_3WS_4WS 4.36p 0.48a 6485.3 13.466 0.979a 2.771p 4.996 1.005a 3.119p 1.774
Dmg_4WS_5WS 0.38s 0.88a 7324.4 12.721 0.102a 1.209p 4.782 0.148a 1.113p 1.890
Dmg_5WS_5CS 3.14s 1.72a 8180.0 13.619 1.675a 0.051s 4.606 1.750a 0.260s 2.046
Dmg_5CS_5CP 0.01s 1.11a 8196.4 14.953 1.688a 0.041s 4.596 1.738a 0.166s 1.957
Dmg_5CP_5WP 2.80p 1.69a 8180.0 13.577 1.675a 0.033s 4.606 1.749a 0.161p 2.041
Dmg_5WP_4WP 0.01p 0.85a 7324.4 12.694 0.098a 1.304s 4.782 0.145a 1.221s 1.889
Dmg_4WP_3WP 4.77s 0.49a 6485.3 13.506 0.979a 2.879s 4.996 1.005a 3.249s 1.785
Dmg_3WP_2WP 0.01p 0.13a 7305.9 12.653 2.768a 1.334s 4.793 2.772a 1.135s 1.913
Dmg_2WP_1WP 0.62p 0.29a 7919.4 13.432 3.239a 0.427s 4.625 3.254a 0.327s 1.944
All the stability results in damaged conditions shown above are in line with the ND requirements in presented
Section 5.0.
The minimum continuous tug bollard pull has been determined for the environmental conditions reported in
section 7.4, considering wave, wind and current acting in head direction of the barge.
𝐵 (0.52 𝐿 − 13)
𝐹𝐷 = 𝐻𝑆2 ∙ ∙ = 9.5 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠
𝐿 9.81
Wind force
The wind force acting on the cargo barge system has been calculated according to the following formula:
1
𝐹𝑊 = ∙ ρ AIR ∙ CS ∙ C H ∙ AW ∙ 𝑉𝑤2 = 8 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠
2𝑔
Current force
The current force acting on the barge has been calculated according to the following formula: (where CXC is
2
1.0 and AC is 65.84 m ):
1
𝐹𝐶 = ∙ CCX ∙ 𝑆 ∙ 𝑉𝑐2 = 0.211 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠)
𝑔
TPRq = FD + FW + FC = 17.723 t
Considering a tug overall length of 55.32 m with Continuous Static Bollard Pull of 50 t, the efficiency of the
tug is:
The barge longitudinal strength check have been performed for the still water condition.
•
4
inertia moment J = 10.68 m
•
3
resistance module W min = 3.828 m
•
2
resistant area AT = 1.447 m
PMS 46 longitudinal strength checked by calculating max expected bending moment and also the max
expected shear force and comparing the two values with the allowable values calculated from classification
society rules.
The following figure show the results of the longitudinal strength analysis:
Longitudinal Strength
<---Aft (Meters) Fw d--->
50.0a 0.0a 50.0f
100.0
Weight x 1.5
Pt Load x 5.0
Buoy. x 1.5
Shear x 20.0
B.M. x 300.0
50.0
0.0
-50.0
-100.0
The sail away shall be Beaufort (5) or better for towing operation by towing vessels from PETROJET yard in
Maadia to ZOHR CCP field location as follow:
Weather forecast should be available onboard transportation vessel and its period is covering the trip
duration. All weather characteristics in the weather forecast should be equal or less than the operational
weather limitation above.
PMS will subcontract specific contractor to provide weather forecasting services twice a day and shall
forecast the weather for a period covering the trip duration, so weather forecasts shall be obtained for a
period covering the trip duration ahead prior departure from PETROJET yard jetty.
The weather forecast shall be available onboard the tug prior to sail away.
The detailed transportation route and navigation maps will be available on board the transportation barge
and shall be checked by MWS prior the sail away or during the vessel check up by the surveyor.
The Transportation Route will be from PETROJET yard in Maadia to ZOHR CCP Field location this
distance will be accomplished using one towing vessel and without stoppage.
So as per the aforementioned definition of transportation in sec. (6):
The transportation can be defined as being completed when Transportation has arrived at installation
site or the approved tug has been disconnected.
The total distance between PETROJET yard jetty in Maadia to the installation site, vessel speed and
expected durations are summarized in the following tables.
1. This procedure addresses all technical issues related to the towing of PMS 46 deck cargo barge
from Maadia yard to the installation field of Zohr CCP.
2. The cargo barges and tug boats shall be inspected and approved by the marine warranty surveyor
prior sail away.
3. The towing line on the tug (main and spare) shall have a breaking strength of three times the bollard
pull of tug.
4. The main towing gear consists of a bridle arrangement and a pennant wire. The emergency towline
shall be similar to the main towline and will be placed on the cargo barge.
5. Each item of the towing gear will be certified. They will be visually inspected and approved by the
marine warranty surveyor prior to sail away. The certificates will be issued prior to sail away of the
barge.
6. After completion of the cargo barge load-out the tanks shall be measured by sounding tubes to
check the final ballast plan of the barge and confirm that it is the same as the stability calculations
approved by MWS. The barge will make slight trim to achieve good sea keeping and to achieve good
directional control while under tow.
7. A general survey will then be carried out on the cargo barge to check the following:
• Trim / list adjustment is as per the stability analysis / towing ballast plan.
8. Prior to departure of tug and barge, the freeboard at barge corners will be measured and recorded.
Both Company’s representative and the tug's master shall pass this information to the installation
barge.
9. Weather forecasts shall be obtained before departure from Maadia jetty for a period covering the trip
duration ahead prior to sail away onboard the tug vessel.
10. The towing tug master shall be completely responsible for the whole towing operation.
11. Towing route and navigation plan shall be available onboard the tug and ready for MWS check prior
sail away date.
12. If the weather forecasts show that the weather condition during the tow worsens; a warning
notification shall be sent to the tug’s master who in turn, shall tow the cargo barge to the nearest
shelter location.
13. Regardless of the above, the tug’s master is authorized to take any decision in case of emergencies
to ensure the safety of the tow.
14. In case of any breakdown during the tow, the tug anchor will immediately be dropped. The
emergency anchor on cargo barge will also be dropped if any malfunction occurs to the tug anchor
or in case of anchor drag.
15. The tug’s master will notify PMS radio room with the location of the tow, a tug from other PMS
spreads working in waters field will be sent to assist the tow. Immediately on notification of
breakdown or any other problem, meanwhile connect the emergency towing line to tug, when this
operation succeeds the emergency anchor will be retrieved and the tug should continue towing to
shelter area to repair the main connection.
16. Anchors should not be dropped in the vicinity of existing subsea assets.
17. Tug Master or his nominated, Senior, Crew Member, to board the barge and inspect the towing
arrangements, sea fastenings, emergency anchoring arrangements, and watertight status of the
barge, for familiarization purposes, prior to the tow combination departing.
• In normal operation PMS marine fleet every three hours reporting the position and weather
condition to PMS El Maadia radio room.
• Generally for all situations during process PMS 12 and AHTS shall report the all relevant issues
both for the emergency radio room in PMS El Maadia premise on shore (DPA).
• At any case of emergency, please refer to the ISM code & AHTS manual covering all
emergency procedures.
• The communication frequencies for contact with all the marine fleet is as follows:
16
- VHF: 69
72
Intact Stability
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.388a 10.239p 0.182 325.1
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.388a 10.239s 0.182 325.1
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.460a 3.684p 0.286 97.6
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.460a 3.684s 0.286 97.6
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.859a 3.429p 0.154 558.3
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.861a 3.427s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.715f 3.429p 0.155 558.3
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.715f 3.429s 0.155 558.3
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 25.371f 10.287p 0.170 558.3
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.289f 10.287s 0.157 558.3
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.289f 3.429p 0.157 558.3
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.289f 3.429s 0.157 558.3
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.949f 3.429p 0.376 30.4
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.949f 3.429s 0.376 30.4
Subtotals: 30.90% 4,426.32 1.278f 0.009p 2.880 5,372.1
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 30.90% 4,426.32 1.278f 0.009p 2.880 5,372.1
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 0.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm 4.0 m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
i
n
3.0 m
2.0
1.0
0.0
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.409a 10.165p 0.183 325.9
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.408a 10.409s 0.183 325.9
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.472a 3.115p 0.287 98.3
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.473a 3.743s 0.287 98.3
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.881a 3.342p 0.154 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.883a 3.514s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.693f 3.343p 0.155 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.693f 3.515s 0.155 558.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 25.351f 10.212p 0.171 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.267f 10.369s 0.157 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.267f 3.347p 0.157 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.267f 3.511s 0.157 558.4
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.957f 3.177p 0.369 25.7
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.957f 3.681s 0.369 25.7
Subtotals: 30.90% 4,426.32 1.276f 0.001s 2.880 5,366.0
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 30.90% 4,426.32 1.276f 0.001s 2.880 5,366.0
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 100.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm 4.0 m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
i
n
3.0 m
2.0
1.0
0.0
Damage Stability
1_Damage_1WP_1CP
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.542a 10.112p 0.184 327.1
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.542a 10.462s 0.184 327.1
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.490a 3.073p 0.288 98.9
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.490a 3.786s 0.288 98.9
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 16.264a 3.280p 0.155 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 16.266a 3.576s 0.155 557.5
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.310f 3.284p 0.156 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.310f 3.574s 0.156 558.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 24.999f 10.168p 0.173 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.884f 10.418s 0.160 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.884f 3.298p 0.160 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.884f 3.560s 0.160 558.4
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.960f 3.709s 0.366 25.9
Subtotals: 30.18% 4,169.42 1.165a 0.637s 2.807 5,344.6
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 30.18% 4,169.42 1.165a 0.637s 2.807 5,344.6
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
Righting Arm A
4.0 r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
i
n
3.0
m
2.0
1.0
0.0
2_Damage_1CP_1CS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.220a 10.248p 0.182 324.2
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.220a 10.248s 0.182 324.2
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.446a 3.673p 0.286 97.3
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.446a 3.673s 0.286 97.3
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.339a 3.429p 0.154 558.3
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.340a 3.427s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.235f 3.429p 0.154 558.3
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.235f 3.429s 0.154 558.3
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 25.849f 10.287p 0.168 558.3
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.809f 10.287s 0.155 558.3
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.809f 3.429p 0.155 558.3
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.809f 3.429s 0.155 558.3
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
Subtotals: 32.01% 4,422.29 1.289f 0.009p 2.882 5,308.7
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 32.01% 4,422.29 1.289f 0.009p 2.882 5,308.7
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
Righting Arm A
4.0 r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
i
n
3.0 m
2.0
1.0
0.0
3_Damage_1WS_1CS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.519a 10.395p 0.183 326.3
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.519a 10.179s 0.183 326.3
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.479a 3.733p 0.287 98.3
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.479a 3.125s 0.287 98.3
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 16.231a 3.495p 0.154 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 16.233a 3.361s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.343f 3.493p 0.156 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.343f 3.365s 0.156 558.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 25.029f 10.340p 0.173 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.917f 10.229s 0.159 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.917f 3.487p 0.159 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.917f 3.371s 0.159 558.4
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.953f 3.664p 0.371 25.6
Subtotals: 30.18% 4,169.42 1.162a 0.649p 2.807 5,341.0
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 30.18% 4,169.42 1.162a 0.649p 2.807 5,341.0
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from starboard at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0p 20.0p 30.0p 40.0p 50.0p 60.0p 70.0p
Righting Arm A
4.0 r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
i
n
3.0 m
2.0
1.0
0.0
4_Damage_1WS_2WS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.281a 10.049p 0.184 326.4
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.281a 10.525s 0.184 326.4
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.479a 3.023p 0.289 99.2
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.479a 3.835s 0.289 99.2
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.421a 3.208p 0.156 558.6
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.423a 3.648s 0.156 557.6
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.153f 3.209p 0.156 558.6
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.153f 3.649s 0.156 558.6
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 25.773f 10.088p 0.170 558.6
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.727f 3.212p 0.157 558.6
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.727f 3.646s 0.157 558.6
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.973f 3.084p 0.361 26.5
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.973f 3.774s 0.361 26.5
Subtotals: 31.27% 4,127.58 1.356a 0.732p 2.834 4,813.2
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 31.27% 4,127.58 1.356a 0.732p 2.834 4,813.2
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm 3.0 m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
2.5 i
n
m
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
5_Damage_3WS_2WS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.148a 10.250p 0.182 323.8
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.148a 10.324s 0.182 323.8
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.440a 3.189p 0.286 97.2
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.440a 3.669s 0.286 97.2
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.112a 3.428p 0.154 558.3
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.114a 3.428s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.462f 3.428p 0.154 558.3
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.462f 3.430s 0.154 558.3
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 26.057f 10.286p 0.168 558.3
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 26.036f 3.428p 0.154 558.3
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 26.036f 3.430s 0.154 558.3
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.952f 3.226p 0.376 25.5
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.952f 3.632s 0.376 25.5
Subtotals: 27.92% 3,514.06 0.048a 2.679p 2.872 4,800.3
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 27.92% 3,514.06 0.048a 2.679p 2.872 4,800.3
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
6_Damage_3WS_4WS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 21.37% 2,689.52 5.057f 6.821p 2.777 5,130.5
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from starboard at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0p 20.0p 30.0p 40.0p 50.0p 60.0p 70.0p
3.0
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area 2.5 s
Equilibrium
i
2.0 n
m
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
7_Damage_5WS_4WS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.654a 10.140p 0.184 327.4
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.494a 3.094p 0.288 98.8
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.495a 3.764s 0.288 98.9
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 16.621a 3.314p 0.154 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 16.623a 3.542s 0.154 557.5
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 3.953f 3.318p 0.157 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 3.953f 3.540s 0.157 558.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 24.671f 10.203p 0.176 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.527f 10.379s 0.163 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.527f 3.337p 0.163 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.527f 3.521s 0.163 558.4
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.955f 3.175p 0.368 25.6
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.955f 3.683s 0.368 25.6
Subtotals: 27.71% 3,528.65 5.442f 2.614p 2.861 5,042.9
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 27.71% 3,528.65 5.442f 2.614p 2.861 5,042.9
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
3.5
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area 3.0 s
Equilibrium
i
n
2.5
m
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
8_Damage_5WS_5CS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 32.297a 9.368p 0.216 307.3
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.584a 2.758p 0.308 103.7
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 17.935a 2.000p 0.177 229.6
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 17.936a 4.855s 0.177 229.2
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 2.650f 2.118p 0.183 260.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 2.650f 4.740s 0.183 260.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 23.275f 9.506p 0.215 486.9
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 23.067f 11.153s 0.204 481.8
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 23.067f 2.563p 0.204 481.8
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 23.067f 4.295s 0.204 481.8
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 37.012f 2.728p 0.339 28.5
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 37.012f 4.130s 0.339 28.5
Subtotals: 33.11% 4,384.22 1.425f 0.010s 2.908 3,379.9
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 33.11% 4,384.22 1.425f 0.010s 2.908 3,379.9
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
Righting Arm A
2.5 r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
2.0 i
n
m
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
9_Damage_5CP_5CS
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.793a 10.212p 0.184 327.6
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.793a 10.362s 0.184 327.6
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 17.084a 3.427p 0.154 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 17.085a 3.429s 0.154 557.5
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 3.490f 3.427p 0.158 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 3.490f 3.431s 0.158 558.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 24.246f 10.286p 0.181 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.064f 10.288s 0.168 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.064f 3.428p 0.168 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.064f 3.430s 0.168 558.4
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.945f 3.230p 0.374 25.1
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.945f 3.628s 0.374 25.1
Subtotals: 32.36% 4,400.66 1.389f 0.008p 2.895 5,171.9
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 32.36% 4,400.66 1.389f 0.008p 2.895 5,171.9
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
4.0
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area 3.5 s
Equilibrium
i
3.0 n
m
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
10_Damage_5CP_5WP
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 32.275a 9.455s 0.211 335.8
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.577a 2.799s 0.305 103.1
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 17.939a 4.813p 0.174 236.6
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 17.939a 2.045s 0.174 236.5
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 2.644f 4.695p 0.180 266.3
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 2.644f 2.163s 0.180 266.3
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 23.299f 10.990p 0.211 488.6
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 23.090f 9.509s 0.200 482.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 23.090f 4.207p 0.200 482.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 23.090f 2.651s 0.200 482.4
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 37.004f 4.068p 0.340 28.1
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 37.004f 2.790s 0.340 28.1
Subtotals: 33.11% 4,384.22 1.426f 0.022p 2.908 3,436.5
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 33.11% 4,384.22 1.426f 0.022p 2.908 3,436.5
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from starboard at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0p 20.0p 30.0p 40.0p 50.0p 60.0p 70.0p
Righting Arm A
2.5 r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
2.0 i
n
m
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
11_Damage_4WP_5WP
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.616a 10.224s 0.183 326.5
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.480a 3.699p 0.287 98.1
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.480a 3.159s 0.287 98.1
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 16.555a 3.431p 0.154 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 16.556a 3.425s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.019f 3.431p 0.156 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.019f 3.427s 0.156 558.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 24.732f 10.288p 0.175 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.593f 10.286s 0.162 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.593f 3.430p 0.162 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 24.593f 3.428s 0.162 558.4
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.947f 3.630p 0.375 25.2
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.947f 3.228s 0.375 25.2
Subtotals: 27.71% 3,528.65 5.449f 2.603s 2.861 5,039.3
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 27.71% 3,528.65 5.449f 2.603s 2.861 5,039.3
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from starboard at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0p 20.0p 30.0p 40.0p 50.0p 60.0p 70.0p
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
12_Damage_4WP_3WP
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.532a 9.250p 0.228 337.4
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.532a 11.324s 0.228 337.4
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.545a 2.558p 0.322 103.9
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.545a 4.300s 0.322 103.9
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.818a 2.306p 0.200 470.0
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.822a 4.549s 0.200 469.5
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.757f 2.318p 0.200 476.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.757f 4.540s 0.200 476.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 25.392f 9.293p 0.212 546.7
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.323f 11.369s 0.201 520.5
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.323f 2.347p 0.201 520.5
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.323f 4.511s 0.201 520.5
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 37.068f 2.374p 0.355 31.1
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 37.068f 4.484s 0.355 31.1
Subtotals: 21.37% 2,689.52 5.057f 6.804s 2.778 4,945.3
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 21.37% 2,689.52 5.057f 6.804s 2.778 4,945.3
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from port at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0s 20.0s 30.0s 40.0s 50.0s 60.0s 70.0s
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm 2.5 m
R. Area s
Equilibrium
2.0 i
n
m
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
13_Damage_2WP_3WP
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.151a 10.324p 0.182 323.8
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.151a 10.250s 0.182 323.8
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.440a 3.670p 0.286 97.2
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.440a 3.189s 0.286 97.2
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.121a 3.430p 0.154 558.3
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.122a 3.426s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.453f 3.430p 0.154 558.3
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.453f 3.428s 0.154 558.3
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 26.027f 10.286s 0.154 558.3
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 26.027f 3.430p 0.154 558.3
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 26.027f 3.428s 0.154 558.3
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.952f 3.632p 0.376 25.5
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.952f 3.226s 0.376 25.5
Subtotals: 27.89% 3,510.15 0.078a 2.671s 2.875 4,800.4
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 27.89% 3,510.15 0.078a 2.671s 2.875 4,800.4
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from starboard at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0p 20.0p 30.0p 40.0p 50.0p 60.0p 70.0p
Righting Arm A
3.5 r
Heeling Arm m
R. Area s
Equilibrium 3.0 i
n
2.5 m
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
14_Damage_2WP_1WP
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.273a 10.454p 0.183 325.6
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.273a 10.119s 0.183 325.6
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.469a 3.778p 0.288 98.5
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.468a 3.080s 0.288 98.5
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.434a 3.571p 0.155 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.435a 3.285s 0.155 557.5
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.140f 3.571p 0.155 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 5.140f 3.287s 0.155 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.714f 10.147s 0.156 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.714f 3.569p 0.156 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.714f 3.289s 0.156 558.4
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.965f 3.721p 0.366 26.1
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.965f 3.137s 0.366 26.1
Subtotals: 31.24% 4,123.67 1.383a 0.730s 2.836 4,808.6
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 31.24% 4,123.67 1.383a 0.730s 2.836 4,808.6
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Note:
Residual Righting Arms shown above are in excess of the wind heeling arms derived from the projected wind plane
at each heel angle, assuming a wind from starboard at 50.0 knots.
Righting Arms vs. Heel - IMO RESOLUTION A.749 & GL-ND STABILITY CRITERIA
Heel angle (Degrees)
0.0s 10.0p 20.0p 30.0p 40.0p 50.0p 60.0p 70.0p
Righting Arm A
r
Heeling Arm m
3.0
R. Area s
Equilibrium
i
2.5 n
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Fluid Legend
Floating Status
Loading Summary
Displacer Status
WATER BALLAST
Tank Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
Name (%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
PUMPROOM 1.025 <empty> 0.0
TANK 5W.P 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.409a 10.165p 0.183 325.9
TANK 5W.S 1.025 4.06% 29.27 31.408a 10.409s 0.183 325.9
TANK 5C.P 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.472a 3.115p 0.287 98.3
TANK 5C.S 1.025 3.55% 12.83 35.473a 3.743s 0.287 98.3
TANK 4W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 4W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 14.859a 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 4C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 15.881a 3.342p 0.154 558.4
TANK 4C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.84 15.883a 3.514s 0.154 557.4
TANK 3W.P 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287p 3.048 0.0
TANK 3W.S 1.025 100.00% 868.40 5.715f 10.287s 3.048 0.0
TANK 3C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.693f 3.343p 0.155 558.4
TANK 3C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 4.693f 3.515s 0.155 558.4
TANK 2W.P 1.025 5.50% 47.76 25.351f 10.212p 0.171 558.4
TANK 2W.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.267f 10.369s 0.157 558.4
TANK 2C.P 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.267f 3.347p 0.157 558.4
TANK 2C.S 1.025 5.05% 43.85 25.267f 3.511s 0.157 558.4
TANK 1W.P 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287p 4.086 0.0
TANK 1W.S 1.025 100.00% 254.88 40.364f 10.287s 4.086 0.0
TANK 1C.P 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.957f 3.177p 0.369 25.7
TANK 1C.S 1.025 0.79% 2.01 36.957f 3.681s 0.369 25.7
Subtotals: 30.90% 4,426.32 1.276f 0.001s 2.880 5,366.0
All Tanks
Spgr Load Weight LCG TCG VCG FSMT
(%) (MT) (m) (m) (m) (MT-m)
Totals: 30.90% 4,426.32 1.276f 0.001s 2.880 5,366.0
Longitudinal Strength
<---Aft (Meters) Fwd--->
50.0a 0.0a 50.0f
100.0
Weight x 1.5
Pt Load x 5.0
Buoy. x 1.5
Shear x 20.0
B.M. x 300.0
50.0
0.0
-50.0
-100.0
Location Weight Buoyancy Shear Bending
(m) (MT/m) (MT/m) (MT) (MT-m)
45.736f 0.0 0.0 0.00 0
45.736f 26.8
45.720f 26.9 0.0 -0.43 0
45.720f 40.5
43.824f 52.7 0.0 -88.82 77
38.525f 17.9* 67.4 -298.54 1121
37.719f 92.2 77.6 -312.34 1365
36.592f 106.5 92.0 -328.75 1724
36.576f 106.5 92.0 -328.98 1729
36.576f 21.3
34.833f 25.0* 92.4 -231.07 2191
30.161f 17.9* 93.6 78.10 2495
30.000f 24.0 93.6 89.31 2481
17.849f 20.7* 96.7 902.36 -3722
16.002f 29.8 97.1 1027.00 -5508
16.002f 105.9
11.398f 25.3* 98.3 960.68 -10153
3.621f 276.8* 100.2 612.74 -17367
3.121f 276.8* 100.4 331.32 -17673
2.690f 80.0* 100.5 247.30 -17816
2.576f 281.0* 100.5 -34.82 -17844
2.172f 278.6* 100.6 -317.19 -17830
0.659f 20.7* 101.0 -352.10 -17343
3.288a 111.5 102.0 -389.59 -15889
4.572a 111.9 102.3 -401.91 -15384
4.572a 109.4
21.571a 9.0* 106.5 -536.96 -7535
25.146a 115.3 107.4 -564.91 -5574
25.146a 29.6
28.557a 390.5* 108.3 -689.95 -4108
28.557a 14.0* 108.3 -689.95 -4108
29.650a 50.0* 108.6 -668.99 -3387
30.810a 8.0* 108.9 -586.87 -2666
31.134a 56.0* 108.9 -617.70 -2481
33.660a 32.0 109.6 -421.69 -1174
33.660a 39.0
35.575a 9.0* 110.1 -295.88 -500
36.576a 40.2 110.3 -225.66 -241
36.592a 40.2 110.3 -224.52 -237
37.548a 29.2 98.4 -157.95 -57
37.549a 29.2 98.4 -157.95 -57
37.837a 27.5 94.8 -138.23 -15
37.838a 27.5 94.7 -138.23 -15
38.000a 27.5 92.7 -127.44 6
39.000a 27.7 80.2 -68.57 101
40.000a 27.9 67.7 -22.36 143
41.000a 28.0 55.2 11.19 145
42.000a 28.2 42.7 32.08 120
43.000a 28.4 30.3 40.32 81
44.600a 28.6 10.3 27.15 19
44.620a 28.6 10.0 26.78 18
45.580a 28.8 0.0 4.03 1
45.720a 28.8 <und> 0.00 0
45.720a 0.0
06/10/2008 20:55
WS No. : BD 070 Originated : RK
Project : ALKhafji Transportation-Trip No. 4 using PMS 46 Checked : SC
Angle to Item COG Nos. Unit Area 1st Mom Area I (local) Lever Arm I (global)
Item At MIDSHIP Section Plt Width Plt Thk Horiz. to Keel bot. n A nxAxY Ixx dy =Y-Yn Ixx + A x dy^2
(Half Side only) b (mm) d (mm) (T) Y (mm) (mm^2) (mm^3) (mm^4) (mm) (mm^4)
1 Side Shell
Shell Plating 6096 12 90.00 3048.0 2 73152 445934592 226534772736.0 -268.0 4.63577E+11
1.0 OBP 220 X 10 - - - 771.3 2 2900 4473540 238900.0 -2544.7 3.75581E+10
2.0 OBP 200 X 10 - - - 1532.7 2 2560 7847424 172100.0 -1783.3 1.62826E+10
3.0 OBP 200 X 10 - - - 2294.7 2 2560 11748864 172100.0 -1021.3 5.34069E+09
4.0 OBP 180 X 8 - - - 3055.4 2 1890 11549412 99000.0 -260.6 2.56889E+08
5.0 OBP 180 X 8 - - - 3817.4 2 1890 14429772 99000.0 501.4 9.50531E+08
6.0 OBP 160 X 8 - - - 4578.8 2 1620 14835312 65500.0 1262.8 5.16691E+09
7.0 OBP 160 X 8 - - - 5340.8 2 1620 17304192 65500.0 2024.8 1.32836E+10
2 Bottom Shell
Bottom Plate 27430 13.5 0.00 6.8 1 370305 2499558.75 5624007.2 -3309.2 4.05524E+12
Longl 220 x 10 0 0 0.00 134.0 32 2900 12435200 14000000.0 -3182.0 9.40054E+11
4 Upper Deck
Plate 27430 17 0.00 6104.5 1 466310 2846589395 11230299.2 2788.5 3.62594E+12
1.0 OBP 280 X 10.5 - - - 5921.0 32 4120 780624640 32230000.0 2605.0 8.95707E+11
Input Ship Service Factor, f1 1 (0.8 for extended protected water service, 1 for unrestricted service)
Yield Stress, V 175 N/mm2 = 17838.94 T/m2
Summer Draft, T 3.911 m
Water Line Length @ T 89.498 m
Moulded Breadth, B 27.430 m
Vol.Displacement @ T 8859.51 m3
Maximum Still Water BM, Ms 282999 kN.m (if not known, enter zero)
Rule Length, L (0.96 * W/L Length) 85.918 m
Length Coefficient, C1 6.533
Block Coefficient, Cb 0.961
SMb 2.198 m3
Factor, K 1.365
Required Section Modulus, SMR 2.999 m3 OK
Page 1
Sheet of Sheets
Company Document ID Contractor Document ID 47 / 50
BOLLARD PULL CALCULATIONS
This work sheet computes the required Bollard Pull for the towed cargo barge PMS 46:
Weather forecast should be available prior to sail away. Wave, wind and current are assumed
to act in the head direction of the barge.
According to DNV Rules for marine operation (Pt.2 Ch.2 / Towing Operaions) ...
A tow out criteria of Beaufort force 5 up to Hs = 2.5m for the comming 72 hours is
operational weather for towing vessels from Maadia Yard to the installation location
Input Data:
Environmental Data:
According to GL ND guidelines for marine transportation 0030 (rev. 6) Section (12.2), Bollard Pull
Requirements:
Since the duration of the transportation is less than 24 hours, this transportation has been classed as stage
tow.
The Meteorological Criteria for Calculating TPR (Calculated Towline Pull Required) has been set to stag
tow where the following design environmental criteria acting simultaneously, may be used:
1
PMS Bollard Pull Calculations ZOHR CCP Transportation &
Installation
Transportation Barge Data:
Length (m.)
L 91.44*
Breadth (m.)
B 27.432*
Depth (m.)
D 6.096*
Loaded Structures Projected Area (m^2) Per Each Height Exposed to the Wind:
Height Coefficient:
Height measured from water line
2
PMS Bollard Pull Calculations ZOHR CCP Transportation &
Installation
Shape Coefficient:
1. Wind Force: ( ABS Formula) AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING ,RULES FOR BUILDING &
CLASSING OFFSHORE MOBILE DRILLING UNITS,1980,SECTION 3
B D d t
2
Vw2
Fw 0.0623
Cs1 Ch1
Cs2 Ch2 A2
A1 1000 *
Cs3 Ch3 A3
Fw 8.004 ( Tonne)
Disp
Vol
1.025 *
S 1.7 L d
t Vol
wetted surface area formula by Denny refer to reeds
2 d *volume (4)
Sft S 10.76391 *
2 0.454
Fc 0.016 Sft Vk
1000 *
Fc 0.211 ( Tonne)
3
PMS Bollard Pull Calculations ZOHR CCP Transportation &
Installation
B ( 0.52 L) 13
Fd Hs
2
L 9.81 *
Fd 9.509 ( Tonne)
4. Calculated Tow Line Bollard Pull (TPRq):
TPRq Fw Fc Fd *
The efficiency (Te) depends on the size and configuration of the nominated tug and the sea state consider
Proposed bollard pull (Bp):
Bp 50* Nominated Towing Vessel (Sea King) Static Continous Bollard Pull
Efficiency related to tug boat configuration:
Te 69.27 %
6. Effective Continuous Bollard Pull (TPR):
Bp Te
TPR
100 *
4
PMS Bollard Pull Calculations ZOHR CCP Transportation &
Installation
Conclusion
The effective continuous bollard pull should be higher than the calculated towline pull required.
(i.e) The Nominated Tug Boat Sea King static continous bollard pull is fairly enough for towing the cargo
barge PMS 46
5
Sheet of Sheets
Company Document ID Contractor Document ID 48 / 50
GENERAL INFORMAITON
Vessel Name : PMS-46
Flag : Egypt
Builder : HARLAND & WOLF – IRELAND
Year of Built : 1985
Class : LR
Type : Flat Topped Pontoon
MAIN PARTICULARS
LENGTH : 91.440 m
BREADTH : 27.432 m
DEPTH : 6.069 m
DRAFT : 4.85 m
G.R.T. : 4035 ton
D.W.T. : 9694 ton
LOADING CAPACITY
Deck Capacity : 15 m ton / m2
Deck Area : 2510 m2
BALLAST SYSTEM
(2) Pumps each capable of 550 m3 / hr
MOORING SYSTEM
Anchor Winch
Make : SUNDERLAND FORGE
Wire Size / Length : 38 mm / 610 m
Anchor
Type : POOL
Weight : 4000 Kg
PMS PMS-46
MACHINERY
Engine : (1)
Make : DETROIT
Model : NO. 1044-7002
Pump : (1)
Make : IRON A/S
Model : QHP-10/300
Capacity : 550 m3 / hr
Engine : (1)
Make : DETROIT
Model : 5102
Pump : (1)
Make : IRON A/S
Model : QHP-10/300
Capacity : 550 m3 / hr
Generator Engine
Make : HATZ
Model : 1D60Z
R.P.M. : 3000
Power Take Off to Pump
Model : 381A 12 SE
Power Take off to Winch
Drive
Make : DETROIT Diesel - ALLISON
Model : 114177
Sheet of Sheets
Company Document ID Contractor Document ID 49 / 50
Towing Vessels
ACCOMMODATION
Crew 12
Passengers 28
(1 x 2 berth) & (7 x 4 berth)
Total 40
This technical specification sheet is subject to change without notice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, no guarantees of accuracy can be given.
For enquires, kindly email us at chartering@sg.vroonoffshore.com.
www.vroonoffshore.com
ACCOMMODATION
Crew 12
Passengers 28
(4 x 1-berth, 3 x 2-berth, 8 x 4-berth)
Total 40
This technical specification sheet is subject to change without notice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, no guarantees of accuracy can be given.
For enquires, kindly email us at chartering@sg.vroonoffshore.com.
www.vroonoffshore.com
- - - . .
est Certijlcate Germ ni. ·cher Lloyd
No.: 53 6?S~MRS/1 _ _
Page i of i
Gen rol Data ~'1hH : '1 ~A
TIw~,.-·-:sI-,P-f'...,.[,-,·r--'------ .----~--- ------
rp,r.' of 1.-",-(- - - - - - - - - . - -
It mandT.:.si :'.! A :-' p:::r~,:; - l'r,an.wlQ! 71 .. h "_1::<:.!.c: f.-:-r CjG:"':'~lq _'1' 'l1~ t:;:<I'::
1\.:: ' 1('':'; ('li t', •. ~'IL 11,S T.)r.:.,
i".s far os it ·::oula oe s;'!;en . "t·\!~ workman1>hlp of Ihe cornplr~ent ell,rlng inspccl\o\i
I lest hos been to the jotisfQction of he undersigned surveyor,
Addition I
Statemenb
r--
r"II1/lIIue jfl'(·l'fd.J/",'
1_
C?"'i'/386/:'.:·::J G6 :HI'
'ro
L"USJUt1WP Qr'\/rr
.----------------------
'::;::: o~L 04 J ~.
Mr:III1!''''I)}Tl'r i Sllppli~r o",F.r I/fJ ----- - - \ _ e_-=----tffi_
1---- ~
_
2.:J !)~. _ \
.-J
We hereby cerilfy l hoi i rO ilem(s ) described ebO','8 WO!; (\·/ere .1 tested I, accordo,'ice 'wln- 't',e
~11elitiCJ r ~ed ;es( procea\Jre~s) by our SUIVe y'or.
1''':;:': ~...~:,.
I
-y
~.. :.
- ------
---- f: ~ i;
.' industriestraBe 9, D-59457 Werl
Oeutschland
Tel. +49 2922 97 430
Fax +49 2922 83 289
e-mail: sales@vanbeest.de
www.vanbeest.de VANBEEST
OUALITAS GmbH
Grafenberger Allee 355
D - 40235 Duesseldorf
ine Description
1 Green Pin® Standard Shackles, bow shackles with safety bolt, 75x83 mm
VAN BEEST GmbH & Co. KG, HersteHung und Vertrieb von Seil- und Kettenzubeh or. Reg. trade mark 'Green Pin '
Sitz der Kommanditgesellschaft Werl, Amtsgericht Amsberg HRA 4416. Komplementar: Van Beest GmbH Werl. Amtsgericht Arnsberg HRB
4201. GeschaftsfUhrer: Comelis Boer. Deutsche Bank: Konto-Nr. 6884100, BLZ: 41670030, BIC: DEUTDE3B416,
IBAN: DE83 416700300688410000. Postbank: Konto-Nr. 5271466, BLZ: 44010046. UST-ID Nr.: DE 126635251.
'-----"=-_ _ _---' Ais Grundlage aller VertragsabschlOsse geUen unsere a"gemeinen Geschafts- und Lieferbedingungen.
2701896 PMS/764/07
Qty Description
30 GPGHMB75, G-4163., Green Pin@ Standard Shackles, bow shackles with safety bolt, hot
dipped galvanized, 75x83 mm, WLL 85T
Material properties
Line Cast no Yieldpoint Tensile Elon Impact test type: Charpy V (Joules) Item T raceabi Iity
(N/mm2) strength gation
(N/mm2) (%)
Temp (0G) 1 2 3 Avg
1 7-9221 688 812 14.0 -20 52 55 52 53 Bow A BS 6 CE
2 7-9221 685 805 15.0 -20 46 45 47 46 Pin BS 6 R
Chemical composition
Line C% Si% Mn% P% S% Cr% Mo% Ni% AI% V%
1 0.200 0.190 1.430 0.016 0.009 0.370 0.020 0.11 0 0.026 0.000
2 0.200 0.190 1.430 0.016 0.009 0.370 0.020 0.1 10 0.026 0.104
AN BE.:..,
VAN e EEST GmbH & Co. KG, Herstellu ng und Vertrieb von Seil- und Kettenzubehor. Reg. trade mark 'Green Pin'
Sitz der Kommanditgesellschaft Werl, Amtsgericht Arnsberg HRA 4416. Komplementar: Van Beest GmbH Werl. Amtsgericht Arnsberg HRB
4201. Geschaftsfuhrer: Cornelis Boer. Deutsche Bank: Konto-Nr. 6884100, BLZ: 41670030, BIC: DEUTDE3B416,
IBAN: DE83 41670030068841 0000. Postbank: Konto·Nr. 5271466, BLZ: 44010046. UST-ID Nr.: DE 126635251.
L....-_-'--_ _ _- ' Ais Grundlage aller Veriragsabschlusse gelten unsere allgemeinen Geschafts- und Lieferbedingungen.
· P.O. BQx 57, 3360../,B Sliedrecht
industrieweg 6, 3301 HJ Sl,adrecht
The Netherlands
Tel. +31 18441 3300
Fax+31184414959
e-mail: sales@vanbeest.nl
www.vanbeest.nl
VANBEEST
QUALITAS GmbH
Grafenberger Allee 355
D - 40235 Duesseldorf
Traceability Traceability Description Qty Date of test Proof load Working load
Bow Pin and applied (T) limit (T)
examination
We declare under our sole responsibility that the underneath mentioned product(s), with CE
marking, comply with the machinery directive 98/37/EG.
This certificate is only valid for Van Beest BV products, used for fittings for lifting equipment, marked as
such.
VAN BEEST BV, manufacturer and supplier of wire rope and chain fittings. Reg. trade mark 'Green Pin'
Rabobank: accountnumber 35 9343 155 , tBAN code: NL86RAB00359343155, SWIFTIBIC code: RABONL2U,
Postbank 189638, VAT number NL 0091.33 .835 .B01 , Chamber of Commerce Dordrecht - number 23009317
All our offers and contracts are subject to our generat conditions of business as registered with the District Court of Dordrecht
L..---..::=:.-_ _ _-' on May 13, 1994 under number 17.088. Copies of these conditions are printed in our catalogue or can be obtained on request.
• .' Industriestrar3e 9, 0-59457 Werl
Deutschland ' ,
e-mail: sal.Gs@vanbeest.de
EC DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY
Number 171606 Shipment no. 36323 Date 13/07/07
Customer no. 04360414 Page 1/1
Your reference
We declare under our sole responsibility that the underneath mentioned product(s), with CE marking, comply
with the machinery directive 98/37/EG.
Qty Description
30 GPGHMB75
G-4163., Green Pin® Standard Shackles, bow shackles with safety bolt, hot dipped
galvanized, 75x83 mm, WLL 85T
We remind you that it is forbidden that the lifting equipment in which the above item(s) is/are used, is put into
'f/AN S~
J.J. Vermeulen
QA manager
VAN BEEST GmbH & Co, KG, Herstellung und Vertrieb von Seil- und Kettenzubehor. Reg. trade mark 'Green Pin '
Sitz der Kom mand itge se llschaft Werl, Amtsgericht Arn sberg HRA 44 16. Komplementa. r: Van Beest GmbH We rl. Amtsgericht Arnsberg HRB
420 1. Gescha ftsfOhre r: Co rnelis Boe r. Deutsche Bank: Konto ·N r. 6884 100, BLZ: 4 1670030 , BIC: DEUTDE3B416,
IBAN: DE83 416700300688410000. Postbank: Konto-Nr. 5271 466 , BLZ: 44010046. UST-ID Nr. : DE 126635251 .
l..---==-___- l Ais Grundlage aller Vertragsa bschlusse ge/ten unse re allgemeinen Geschafts- und Lieferbedingungen.
KO N OTEC NC.
OSAKA - JAPAN
Item of test Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min.
Tensile strength (N/mmL) 2010 19 10
I Number of bending (timeI1S00) 22 17
T.Q.C.Chief : Haruhide Daichi Auditor : Shikio Joiji Assessor : K.Oeorge Date : 2011 -04-2 5
Certificate no: LY01001025
Page 1 of 2
J,lovd's
Project:
Inspectio n Dates
This certificate is issued to MARfT to certify that. the undersigned Surveyor to t his Society attended their works at Valenciennes. France
on and between the afore mentioned dates and the material described has been accepted :
ITEM 10:
-(6x20m ) + (1 xl1 Om) 64 mm dia galvanised steel w ire ropes composed of 6X4 1"JvS (IWRC) steel core .
Tensi le strength 1960 N/mm2 . Mini Breakin g Load 274 tons -Thimble type K2B 17" - T O% loss on the th imble.
WLL:50T
-200 Shackles bolt type SWL 8 5T. Body dia 76 mm-Pin dia 82 mm as per DT 340.
.~ - ,
- 5 x 5 m stud link chain dia 73 mm Grade U2 , enlarged & open end link at each end to DT 100& 101 .
~,
ITEM 20:
-(4x16.5m) + (2x20m) + (1 xl OOm ) 6) mm dia galvanised steel wire ropes composed of 6x41 WS (IWRC) steel core.
Tensile strength 1960 N/mm2 .Mini Breaking load 274 tons-Thimble type K2 B 17" - 10% loss on the thimble .
WLL:50T
-5 x 6m stud link chain di a 64 mm Grade U2 ,enlarged & open link at each end
to DT 100 & 101 .
Lloyd's Register, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and COllectively, referred to in this clause as t, ~e 'Lloyd' s
Register Gro up '. The Lloyd' s Register Group assumes no resp onsibility and shall not be liable to any perso n fo r any loss. damage or expense caused by reliance on the
informatio n or advice in th is document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a co ntract with the relevant Lloyd's Register Group entity for the provisio n
of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on t he terms and conditio ns set out in that contract.
Form 11 23 (2008.07)