Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LAW784 - DISCUSSION Eric Chia Case
LAW784 - DISCUSSION Eric Chia Case
LAW784 - DISCUSSION Eric Chia Case
2 March 2007
CLJ Law MALAYSIA
http://www.cljlaw.com
Print this page
Introduction:
To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now
- http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription
Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going
to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
COURT
FEDERAL COURT
COURT OF APPEAL
SUBJECT INDEX
CIVIL PROCEDURE
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
LAND LAW
TRUSTS
^^
COURT
HIGH COURT
Azlan Maidin & Anor v. Pentadbir Tanah Melaka Tengah & Anor
(Land law - Caveat - Private caveat) [2007] 7 CLJ 237
PP v. Marwan Ismail
(Criminal procedure - Jurisdiction of court - Magistrate's court - Transmission of
case to High Court) [2007] 7 CLJ 243
PP lwn. Roslan Abdullah
(Keterangan - Maklumat menjurus kepada penemuan - Akta Keterangan 1950, s.
27) [2007] 7 CLJ 249
Sakyo Corporation & Anor v. Dow Jones & Company Inc & Ors
(Civil procedure - Service - Out of jurisdiction) [2007] 7 CLJ 283
SUBJECT INDEX
BANKRUPTCY
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Summary judgment - Loan - Claim for - Appeal against - Coercion and undue
influence - Allegations of - Whether second defendant showed consent to
agreement caused by coercion - Contracts Act 1950, s. 15 - Whether alleged undue
influence caused to first defendant irrelevant to second defendant - Contracts Act
1950, s. 19 - Whether defence mere bare allegations - Whether unfounded and
could not stand in law - Whether plainly contrary to contemporary documentary
evidence - Triable issues - Whether raised
Yayasan Melaka v. Photran Corporation Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Abdul Wahab Said J) [2007] 7 CLJ 308 [HC]
CONTRACT
Loan agreement - Breach of - Debt - Claim for - Defence of coercion and undue
influence - Whether proved - Whether second defendant showed consent to
agreement caused by coercion - Contracts Act 1950, s. 15 - Whether alleged undue
influence caused to first defendant irrelevant to second defendant - Contracts Act
1950, s. 19 - Whether defence mere bare allegations - Whether unfounded and
could not stand in law - Whether plainly contrary to contemporary documentary
evidence - Triable issues - Whether raised
Yayasan Melaka v. Photran Corporation Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Abdul Wahab Said J) [2007] 7 CLJ 308 [HC]
CRIMINAL LAW
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
LAND LAW
Caveat - Private caveat - Locus standi - Whether private caveats have lapsed -
Whether plaintiffs entitled to decree of specific performance - Whether plaintiffs
had locus standi to commence application
Azlan Maidin & Anor v. Pentadbir Tanah Melaka Tengah & Anor
(Low Hop Bing J) [2007] 7 CLJ 237 [HC]
INDEKS PERKARA
KETERANGAN
UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH
Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - Seksyen 39B(1)(a) - Mengedar 416 gram dadah
jenis ganja - Akhir kes pembelaan - Sama ada keterangan dari pihak pembelaan
boleh mengenepikan kes pendakwaan yang diputuskan prima facie - Asas
pembelaan menjurus kepada penafian semata - Penggantungan kepada bentuk
pembelaan berupa ‘bare denial' - Sama ada mencukupi - Milikan dan pengetahuan
- Sama ada dibuktikan - Elemen pengetahuan terhadap keujudan dadah - Sama ada
boleh diketepikan - Skop pemakaian s. 27 Akta Keterangan 1950 - Sama ada
menepati definasi - Sama ada pihak pembelaan gagal menimbulkan sebarang
keraguan munasabah terhadap kesahihan kes pendakwaan - Sama ada OKT
bersalah dan disabitkan di atas pertuduhan tersebut
PP lwn. Roslan Abdullah
(Abd Halim Aman PK) [2007] 7 CLJ 249 [HC]