SEMANTIC AND PRAGMATICS

POLITENESS

Lecturer: Emiliya Sukma Dara

Completed by

Elsa Lestari Purba (0304171015)

Leni Maharani (0304173197)

Saut Marito Siregar (0304172135)

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION

FACULTY OF TARBIYAH AND TEACHING TRAINING
STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY
OF NORTH SUMATERA
2020
 PREFACE

All praise to Allah SWT, by his forever mercies and blessings enable the
writers completed this paper with the title “Politeness”. Sholawat and salutation to
our Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him who brought us from the darkness to
the lightness.

The writers would like to express our great honor and the deepest gratitude
to Emiliya Sukma Dara. as a lecturer of English Phonology course that has given
the confidence to complete this task.

The writers sincerely hope that this paper will be useful in order to
increase our knowledge as well as our insights on Semantic and Pragmatics. The
writers are fully aware that in this paper there are shortcomings and far from
perfect words.

Hopefully this simple paper can be understood for anyone who reads it.
This paper has been prepared it can be useful for us or the people who read it.
Previously, I apologize if there are many errors of words that are less favorable
and we ask for constructive criticism and suggestions from the readers for the
improvement of this paper in the future.

Medan, May 18th, 2020

The writers
 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of Study

Every human being in this world has to communicate to each other to fulfil his
or her own needs. In reaching the goal of communication, at least, there will be
two parties, the speaker and hearer. In communication, people convey their
intentions and know other’s needs through their utterances. By saying their
intentions, people can achieve their aims. On the other hand, by knowing other’s
needs, people can place themselves to respond in a certain way.

Pragmatics is the study of speakers’ meaning. It has, consequently, more to do

with the analysis of what people mean by their utterances than what the words or
phrases in those utterances might mean by themselves. When doing an interaction
or making an utterance, people should pay attention to the hearer. They have to
treat the hearer in appropriate ways. It can be realized by speaking carefully in
order to make others feel comfortable. Thus, they have to pay attention to others
expectation which means that the speaker is doing politeness.

Politeness in pragmatics is something rather different from an everyday

understanding of it and focusing almost uniquely on polite language in the study
of verbal language. Generally, being polite involves taking into account the
feelings of others. Besides, being polite also means employing awareness of
others feeling. Being linguistically polite involves speaking to people
appropriately in the right place and at the right time. People must be aware of the
context of speaking because politeness in a certain area is different from others.
1.2 Problem of Study

Based on the above background, the problem in this study can be formulated as
follows.

1. What is definition of politeness?

2. What is politeness strategy?
3. What is principles politeness?

1.3 Aim of Study

1. To Know Definition of Politeness.
2. To know Politeness Strategy.
3. To Know The Principles of Politeness.
 CHAPTER II

DISCUSSION

2.1 Definition of Politeness

Politeness is a very important principle in a language use and in

communication. It can be defined as a means to show awareness of another
person’s face (Yule, 1996:60). In pragmatics, politeness is concerned with
“...ways in which the relational function in linguistic action is expressed” (Kasper
in Barron, 2003:15). It is concerned with how language is employed in a strategic
way to achieve such aims as supporting or maintaining interpersonal relationships.
Politeness involves how one can make other feel more pleasant. It also includes
the appropriate linguistic choice in accordance with a certain social and situational
context. The discussion of politeness cannot be separated from the discussion of
face.1
Politeness theory is the theory that accounts for the redressing of the affronts
to face posed by face-threatening acts to addressees. First formulated in 1978 by
Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson, politeness theory has since expanded
academia’s perception of politeness. Politeness is the expression of the speakers’
intention to mitigate face threats carried by certain face threatening acts toward
another (Mills, 2003, p. 6). Another definition is “a battery of social skills whose
goal is to ensure everyone feels affirmed in a social interaction”. Being polite
therefore consists of attempting to save face for another.
According to dictionary.com, politeness is defined as “showing good manners
towards others” or as being “refined or cultured” (2011); however, in the field of
linguistics the concept of politeness is much more complex. This website outlines
some of the theorists who have made major contributions to the development of
politeness theory and its role in discourse. We found that Lakoff, Leech and
Brown and Levinson were some of the earliest linguists to study politeness. Since
then, many other theorists have either built on their ideas and principles or tried to
disprove them. Fraser and Nolen and Scollon and Scollon propose a more social
interactional perspective on politeness. Eelen and Watts, on the other hand, differ
1
Cutting, J. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge.
from previous theorists by dividing politeness into two separate definitions and by
stressing the differences within politeness due to culture.2
Politeness is the expression of the speakers' intention to mitigate face threats
carried by certain face threatening acts toward another. Politeness consists of
attempting to save face for another. Politeness theory states that some speech acts
threaten others face needs. It was created in 1987 by Penelope Brown and Stephen
Levinson and their research has since expanded academia's perception of
politeness. He discusses face in reference to how people present themselves in
social situations and that our entire reality is constructed through our social
interactions.3
2.2 Politeness Strategy
People usually use certain ways which are called strategy to deal with
politeness. The strategy is applied differently in one culture to others, since it is
influenced by any internal and external factors of communication. According to
Brown and Levinson (in Watts, 2003:85), in communication, the speaker should
have a way to assess the dangers of threatening other participants’ face and to
choose the appropriate strategies in order to minimize any face threats that might
be involved in carrying out the goal-directed activity called as politeness strategy.
There are four kinds of politeness strategies proposed by Brown and Levinson:
Bald On Record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, and Off Record.
1. Bald On Record
The speaker does nothing to minimize threats to the hearer’s face. The prime
reason for its usage is that whenever a speaker wants to do the FTA with
maximum efficiency more than he wants to satisfy the hearer’s face, even to any
degree, he will choose bald on record strategy (Brown and Levinson, 1978: 95).
This type of strategy is commonly found in people who know each other very
well, and who are very comfortable in their environments, such as a close friend
and family.
For example:
Giving suggestion: Dress like a goddess and gods will flock to you!

2
www.Dictionary.com (accessed at May 18,2020 )
3
Sholihatul Hamidah, Language and Society, (2019, Lembaga Peduli Pengembangan Pendidikan
Indonesia, Medan) pages: 76
 2. Positive Politeness
The positive politeness strategy is usually seen in groups of friends, or where
people in the given social situation know each other fairly well (Watts, 2003:87).
This strategy is used to minimize the distance between them by expressing
friendliness and solid interest in the hearer's need to be respected (minimize the
FTA). In this strategy, the threat to face is relatively low.
For example:
Seeking agreement in safe topics : I agree. Right. Manchester United played
really badly last night, didn’t they? D’you reckon you could give me a
cigarette?
3. Negative Politeness
Negative politeness strategies are oriented towards the hearer’s negative face
and emphasize avoidance of imposition on the hearer (Watts, 2003:88). Negative
politeness focuses on minimizing the imposition by attempting to soften it. In this
strategy, the threat to face is relatively high.
For example:
Being indirect: Could you tell me the time, please?
4. Off Record
The FTA is performed ‘Off Record’, typically through the deployment of an
indirect illocutionary act which has more than one interpretation and, thus, allows
for plausible deniability on the part of the utterer if the intended recipient takes
offence at the face threat inherent in the utterance (Bousfield, 2008:58). If the
speaker wants to do an FTA, it means that he wants to avoid the responsibility in
doing it. He can do off record and leave it up to the addressee to decide how to
interpret it. In this strategy, the threat to face is very high.4
For example:
Giving association clues: Oh God, I’ve got headache again.

4
Watts, R.J. 2003. Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.3 Leech’s Politeness Principles
Politeness is concerned a relationship between self and other. In conversation,
self is identified as the speaker and other is the hearer. Politeness principle is
minimizing the expression of impolite beliefs, and maximizing the expression of
polite beliefs which is somewhat less important (Leech, 1983:81). Politeness
principle proposes how to establish feeling of community and social relationship.
Thus, politeness principle focuses on the process of interpretation that the center
of the study is on the effect of the hearer rather than the speaker. There are six
maxims of the politeness principles in daily conversation.
a. Tact maxim
The tact maxim is minimizing cost to other and maximizing benefit to other.
This maxim is applied in Searle’s speech act, commissives and directives called
by Leech as impositives. Commissives is found in utterances that express
speaker’s intention in the future action. Then, Directives/ impositives are
expressions that influence the hearer to do action.
The example of the tact maxim is as follows:
“Won‘t you sit down?”
“Could I interrupt you for half a second – what was the website address?”
b. Generosity maxim
The generosity maxim states to minimizing benefit to self and maximizing
cost to self. Like tact maxim, the generosity maxim occurs in commissives and
directives/ impositives. Unlike the tact maxim, the maxim of generosity focuses
on the speaker, and says that others should be put first instead of the self. This
maxim is centered to self, while the tact maxim is to other.
The example will be illustrated as follows:
“You relax and let me do the dishes.”
“You must come and have dinner with us.”
c. Approbation maxim
The approbation maxim requires to minimizing dispraise of other and
maximizing praise of other. This maxim instructs to avoid saying unpleasant
things about others and especially about the hearer. This maxim occurs in
assertives/ representatives and expressives. Assertives/ representatives are
utterances that express the true propositional. Meanwhile, expressive are
utterances that show the speaker feeling.
The example is sampled below.
A: “The performance was great!”
B: “Yes, wasn’t it!”
d. Modesty maxim
In the modesty maxim, the participants must minimize praise of self and
maximize dispraise of self. This maxim is applied in assertives/ representatives
and expressives like the approbation maxim. Both the approbation maxim and the
modesty maxim concern to the degree of good or bad evaluation of other or self
that is uttered by the speaker. The approbation maxim is exampled by courtesy of
congratulation. On other hand, the modesty maxim usually occurs in apologies.
The sample of the modesty maxim is below.
A: “Please accept this small gift as prize of your achievement.”
B: “Oh, I’m so stupid – I didn’t make a note of our lecture! Did you?”
e. Agreement maxim
In the agreement maxim, there is tendency to maximize agreement between
self and other people and minimize disagreement between self and other. The
disagreement, in this maxim, usually is expressed by regret or partial agreement. ‘
It is in line with Brown and Levinson‘s positive politeness strategies of ‘seek
agreement’ and ‘avoid disagreement,’ to which they attach great importance.
However, it is not being claimed that people totally avoid disagreement. It is
simply observed that they are much more direct in expressing agreement, rather
than disagreement. This maxim occurs in assertives/ representatives illocutionary
act.
There example will be illustrated below.
A: “English is a difficult language to learn.”
B: “True, but the grammar is quite easy.”
f. Sympathy maxim
The sympathy maxim explains to minimize antipathy between self and other
and maximize sympathy between self and other. In this case, the achievement
being reached by other must be congratulated. On other hand, the calamity
happens to other, must be given sympathy or condolences. This maxim is
applicable in assertives/ representatives. The example is as follows. This includes
a small group of speech acts such as congratulation, commiseration, and
expressing condolences – all of which is in accordance with Brown and
Levinson’s positive politeness strategy of attending to the hearer’s interests,
wants, and needs.5
1. “I’m terribly sorry to hear about your father.”
2. “I am sorry to hear about your father”.

5
Leech, G. 1991. Principle of Pragmatics: Eight Impressions. New York: Longman Group UK Ltd.
 CHAPTER III
CLOSING
3.1 Conclusion
Politeness is a very important principle in a language use and in
communication. It can be defined as a means to show awareness of another
person’s face (Yule, 1996:60). In pragmatics, politeness is concerned with
“...ways in which the relational function in linguistic action is expressed” (Kasper
in Barron, 2003:15). It is concerned with how language is employed in a strategic
way to achieve such aims as supporting or maintaining interpersonal relationships.
Politeness involves how one can make other feel more pleasant. It also includes
the appropriate linguistic choice in accordance with a certain social and situational
context. The discussion of politeness cannot be separated from the discussion of
face
There are four kinds of politeness strategies proposed by Brown and
Levinson: Bald On Record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, and Off
Record. Politeness also means a way to establish and maintain feelings of
community within the social group (Leech, 1983:82). In Watts (2003, 66-67),
Leech sum up politeness principles in six principles: Tact Maxim, Generosity
Maxim, Approbation Maxim, Modesty Maxim, Agreement Maxim, and Sympathy
Maxim.
3.2 Suggestion
 REFERENCES
Cutting, J. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New
York: Routledge.

Leech, G. 1991. Principle of Pragmatics: Eight Impressions. New York: Longman

Group UK Ltd.

Sholihatul, Hamidah.2019. Language and Society. Medan: Lembaga Peduli

Pengembangan Pendidikan Indonesia

Watts, R.J. 2003. Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

www.Dictionary.com (accessed at May 18,2020 )