Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Bag of Loot
A Bag of Loot
During the forced wait, Dannreuther's wife, Maria (Gina Lollobrigida), takes a
liking to a young upper-class Englishman named Harry Chelm (Edward
Underdown). Fortunately for Dannreuther, Chelm has a neglected wife:
Jennifer Jones, looking better in cat's-eye sunglasses than anyone has ever
looked since. Her Gwendolen is such a devoted reader of romantic fiction that
she can't help concocting unlikely explanations for why Dannreuther and his
crew are lying around soaking up the sun and the Cinzano. "I think you're
doctors. Evil ones, I mean," she decides. Perhaps Dannreuther's companions
do look like graduates of the same med school that matriculated Moreau,
Mabuse, Moriarty, Frankenstein and Julius No. His partners include Robert
Morley, subbing for Sydney Greenstreet, and Lorre (as a German-accented
"Mr. O'Hara"), his hair dyed an alarming platinum blond.
Beat the Devil suggests a remake of Huston's own The Maltese Falcon written
by Joe Orton and Oscar Wilde. Supposedly, Bogart loathed the picture.
Possibly this is because he sunk his money in it, and it, in turn, sank. ("Only
phonies like it," Bogart used to grouse.) Too bad Bogart was blind to its
merits; he displays ascot-wearing, rotting handsomeness and keen, raspy wit.
It's a warm but acrid sunset performance, and it inspired a well-deserved cult.
If Beat the Devil doesn't make a lot of logical sense, forgive it: as one
character here sighs, "Charm and dependability so seldom go in the same
package."
Beat the Devil (1954; 89 min.), directed by John Huston, written by Truman Capote and
Huston, based on the novel by Claud Cockburn (as James Helvick), photographed by
Oswald Morris and starring Humphrey Bogart and Jennifer Jones.
http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/01.29.98/beat-devil-9804.html
Over the past ten years there has been an explosion in the number of books published that
explore the connection between law and film. During the same period the advent of relatively
inexpensive emerging media technologies impacted on the production of new work, especially new
documentary work. The relative ease with which films can be made and even marketed today
raises interesting questions about the relationship of law to film and filmmaking. The legal
academy's increasing fascination with film is reflected in the growing number of courses dedicated
to exploring law in film or making wide-spread use of film in teaching students about law.
Films have always reflected prevailing attitudes about law, lawyers and the legal system. But
some legal scholars, like Richard Sherwin, argue that contemporary films, whether feature films,
documentaries or docudramas, unduly influence legal culture as well. "Real legal issues and
controversies give rise to popular legal representations just as popular legal representations help
to inform and shape real legal issues and case outcomes" (Sherwin, 2000). This is particularly
true of documentary or nonfiction films. The prominence and availability of documentary films on
political issues during the 2004 presidential election raises interesting questions about the impact
of film on democratic institutions and democracy in general.
During this day and a half symposium law professors, filmmakers, film critics and film industry
officials will discuss some of these questions and explore other issues related to the impact of film
on law, lawyers and the legal system.
This Program is funded in part by a generous grant from the France-Merrick Foundation to the
University of Maryland School of Law's Linking Law & the Arts Series.
http://www.law.umaryland.edu/faculty/conferences/detail.html?conf=24