Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rahul Crim Final
Rahul Crim Final
Project submitted by
Rahul sharma
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The successful completion of any task would be, but incomplete, without the mention of
people who made it possible and whose constant guidance and encouragement crowned my
effort with success.
I would like to thank my course teacher Mr. Parvesh Rajput for providing me the topic of my
interest. Also I would like to thank our Vice Chancellor for providing the best possible
facilities of I.T and library in the university.
I would also like to extend my warm and sincere thanks to all my colleagues, who
contributed in innumerable ways in the accomplishment of this project.
Rahul sharma
Roll No.125
Semester VII
2
Table of Contents
TOPIC
PAGE NO.
Introduction 5
Chapter Scheme 6
o Methodology to Prepare Paper
3
o The Police Act 1861
o Railways Act 1989
o The Probation of Offenders Act. 1958
o The Motor Vehicles Act 1988
o Indian Fatal Accident Act, 1855
o Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. 2005
o The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act 2007
o The Sexual Harassment of Woman at Work Place (Prevention. Prohibition)
o Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. 2012
Conclusion 27
4
INTRODUCTION
"My life has been permanently changed. I will never forget being raped,
kidnapped, and robbed at gunpoint however; my sense of disillusionment with the
judicial system is many times more painful. I could not, in good faith, urge anyone
to participate in this hellish process."
This is a statement made by a victim testifying at a sub-committee hearing on the Victim and
Witness Protection Act of 1982 in the U.S. The victim's apathy towards criminal justice
system is clearly articulated by this statement.1
In the inception, the criminal justice System was focused on punitive process only. The
adjudicating authorities were complacent either by convicting or acquitting the accused by
subjecting him/her to a fair trial. During lapse of time it was found that the criminal justice
system was more or less revolving around the accused and in this way the victim has been
totally ignored by the courts.
The initial focus of criminologists were only on the aspect of punishment but the focus
started shifting when they encountered with the fact that the person who is victim of crime is
getting nothing out of the whole process of criminal justice system or is getting a so called
satisfaction by seeing the offender punished. Therefore, jurists, penologist etc in all countries
started giving their full attention to the cause of victim in the form of compensation and other
reliefs. Hence the whole debate started about ways, means and extent of compensation. This
paper is an addition to the same as it tries to look in to the position of rights available to the
victim in Criminal Justice System.
1
A. T. 37 reprinted in 1982 U.S. Code congress and admin. News at 2543.
5
CHAPTER SCHEME
The whole paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is introductory in nature. We have tried
to bring forward the concept of rights of victims of crime. Second chapter depicts the international
perspective of the rights of victims. The third chapter of the research work is devoted to the
comprehensive study and analysis of the history, development and legal provisions of compensation in
India. Further this chapter has been divided into two parts i.e. general laws and special laws. In general
law the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Constitution and in Special laws like Probation of Offenders
Act, 1958, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 etc. have been discussed. In this chapter plea bargaining is
explained. The chapter deals with the role of judiciary giving rights to victim of crimes by awarding
compensation . The last chapter concludes the paper with the challenges and some concrete suggestions.
The study is a humble effort towards the main objective of providing a viable legislation which could
provide rights to the victims of crime so that the victim is not ignored in the whole process of
administration of justice. Thus, this paper is an attempt to streamline the existing laws relating to rights
of victim, particularly with special reference to the rights of victims under our criminal justice system.
6
MEANING OF VICTIM/ WHO IS A VICTIM
John P. J. Dussich in Victimology - Past, Present And Future2 explained (Webster's 1971):
The word "victim" has its roots in many ancient languages that covered a great distance
from north-western Europe to the southern tip of Asia and yet had a similar linguistic pattern
Further the word "Victim" has it roots in the early religious notions of suffering, sacrifice and
death. This concept of "victim" was well known in the ancient civilizations, especially in
Babylonia, Palestine, Greece, and Rome. In each of these civilizations the law mandated that
the victim should be recognized as a person who deserved to be made whole again by the
offender.
3
In "State of Gujarat v. Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat” Hon'ble Supreme Court held that "A
glimpse at the field of victimology reveals two types of victims. First type consists of direct
victims i.e. those who are alive and suffering on account of the harm inflicted by the prisoner
while committing the crime. Second type comprises of indirect victims who are dependants of
the direct victims of crimes who undergo sufferings due to deprivation of their breadwinner. ”
Later on by Crimial Law Amendment Act 20084 the term "victim" was defined by inserting a
new Section 2 (Wa) in Cr.P.C. According to this section "Victim means a person who has
suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of an act or omission for which the accused
person has been charged and the expression victim includes his or her legal guardian or
legal heir.”
In wider sense, the victims of crime are those who have already suffered harm or are perhaps
still suffering, directly or indirectly in consequence of crimes having been committed. The
immediate family memebers or dependents of the direct victims, who are adversely affected
are also included within the meaning of the term VICTIM. The plight of the victims does not
end with the crime but it continues. It may even persist and enhance subsequent to the crimes,
they face the rigors of the reality such as lack of support system, insufficiency of social
2
John P. J. 'Dussicft' in Victimology- Past, Present And Future.
3
State of Gujarat vs High court of Gujarat AIR1998 S.C. 3164.
4
The Criminal Law Amendment Act 2008, (No 5 of 2009) (w.e.f. 31.12.09).
7
assistance and sense of insecurity. They also experience the complexities of police
investigation, magisterial inquiry and criminal trial.
The Hammurabi code of ancient Babylonian makes the earliest reference to state compensation for
victims of crime. It specified that: "If a man has committed robbery and is caught, that man shall
be put to death. If the robber is not caught, the man who has been robbed shall formally
declare what he has lost and the city shall replace whatever he has lost for him. If it is the life
of the owner that is lost, the city or the mayor shall pay one maneh of silver to his kinsfolk. ”
In the modem age, New-Zealand emerged as the first country to have established a
programme of compensation to victim of crime. In 1964 a Criminal Injuries Compensation
Board was established to manage the schemes of compensation to victims of crime. Within
5
The Republic – Plato.
6
Rattan Singh vs State of Punjab, (1979) 4 SCC 719.
8
four months after this The United Kingdom introduced the scheme of criminal injuries
compensation. Resulted in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act, 1969 and intends to
compensate victims of crime for the loss or expenses incurred as a result of that crime. The
definition of victim includes in it's fold the dependants, close relatives and friends.
The Canada Compensation Programme was first initiated in Ontario in 1967 under Law
Enforcement Compensation Act. It was re-enacted in 1971 and further amended in 1973.
Ontario program granted compensation both for injuries and death resulting from crimes of
violence. Compensation is also granted for injuries sustained while preventing or attempting
to prevent an offence and for injuries suffered during making of a lawful arrest.
The Council of Europe in convention of 1983, considered reasons of equity and social
solidarity to deal with the situation of victims of intentional crime of violence. Which
provides compensation for loss or earning, medical and Hospitalization expense and funeral
expense and as regards dependants loss of maintenance. This also provided the State shall
undertake and contribute to compensate the victims of crime. The convention has so far been
ratified by 17 member states.
In 1984, Congress of USA passed Victims of Crime Act, 1984 which established a “crime
victim fund" with the US treasury with the view to provide victim assistance and
compensation programme that offered ongoing support and service to those affected by
violent crimes. The legislation guarantees a certain amount of relief for compensable crimes
like Domestic Violence, Sexual assault, child abuse and the like.
Within four months after this The United Kingdom introduced the scheme of criminal
injuries compensation. Resulted in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act, 1969 and intends
to compensate victims of crime for the loss or expenses incurred as a result of that crime. The
definition of victim includes in it's fold the dependants, close relatives and friends.
Cognizant with the fact that millions of people through out the world suffer harm as a result
of crime and the abuse of power, the U.N., General Assembly adopted a resolution on
November 26, 1985, dealing with the rights of victims.
9
The right of compensation to the victim was finally crystallised in the United Nations
Declaration of Basic Principle of Justice for Victims of Crime Abuses of Power of 1985,
which recognises four types of rights and entitlements of victims of crime-
1. Access to justice and fair trial,
2. Right to restitution,
3. Personal assistance and support services, and
4. Compensation.
10
HISTORY, DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT POSITION IN 1NDIA
The evolution of the concept can be traced both historically and theoretically. The concept of
Right of victim by way of compensation was not new to India and existed in more developed
sense then the present. Manu in Chapter VIII, verse 287 clearly says that if limb is injured, a
wound is caused or blood flows, the assailant shall be made to pay the expense of the cure or
the whole. He further in verse 288 says that: He who damages the goods of another, be it
intentionally or unintentionally, shall give to the owner a kind of fine equal to damage.
The quotes regarding the same can be found even in the works of Brihaspati . This is in brief,
the law relating to compensation to the victim of crime that existed in ancient civilization of
India. In the pre independence period the criminal justice system remained largely
preoccupied with the crime-control oriented policy that viewed criminal justice in terms of a
state monopoly with a narrow focus of justice, confined to the state and accused. However, in
the post-independent e period it expanded beyond the reformation and rehabilitation of the
offender to acknowledge the plight and concerns of the victims.
Inspite of these emerging trend the aspect of rights of victim, more particularity, the aspect of
compensation, remains subordinate to the punitive role of the Slate. Great Jurist of our
country Justice Krishuno Iyer, In Italian Singh 7 highlighting the continued apathy of law to a
victim of crime, observed that:- "It is a weakness of our jurisprudence that victims of crime
and the distress of the dependents of the victim do not find the Mention of law. In fact, the
victim reparation it still the vanishing point of our criminal law.”
Legislation in India dealing with Rights to “Victims of Crime”- The 154th Law Commission
Report on the Cr.P.C. devoted an entire chapter to Victimology in which the growing
emphasis on victims rights in criminal trials was discussed extensively as under increasingly
the attention of criminologists, penologists and reformers of criminal justice system has been
directed to victimology, control of victimization and protection of victims of crimes. Crimes
often entail substantive harm to people and not merely symbolic harm to the social order.
Consequently, the needs and rights of victims of crime should receive priority attention in the
11
total response to crime. One recognized method of protection of victims is compensation to
victims of crime. The needs of victims and their family are extensive and varied.
The principles of victimology has foundations in Indian Constitutional Jurisprudence. The
provision on Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV)
form the bulwark for a new social order in which social and economic justice would blossom
in the national life of the country (Article 38). Article 41 mandates inter alia that the State
shall make effective provisions for securing the right to public assistance in cases of
disablement and in other cases of undeserved want. So also Article 51-A makes it a
fundamental duty of every Indian citizen, inter alia to have compassion for living creatures
and to develop humanism. If emphatically interpreted and imaginatively expanded these
provisions can form the constitutional underpinning for victimology. Their dependents only
in a limited manner. Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure incorporates this concept
to an extent and empowers the criminal courts to grant compensation to the victims.7
7
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad vs State of Maharashtra 2013 A.I.R. SC. 3153.
12
THE INDIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IS COVERED OVERALL BY FOUR
LAWS.
o The Constitution of India.
o Indian Penal Code.
o Criminal Procedure Code.
o Evidence Act.
13
of a hospital either public or private. Coupled with the provision under section 357(c) CrPC
which can be considered as right of victim. Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) S. 228-A was
incorporated in IPC, where disclosure of identity of victim is restricted and punishable.
Compensatory Rights -
The code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, inter alia, contains a provision which empowers a
criminal court to order payment of a specified sum of money,by way of compensation, at its
descretion , to the offender for making good the "loss” or “injury” inflicted by him on the
victim. This is enshrined in section 357(1) of the code which states that, the court may, while
imposing a sentence of fine or a sentence of which fines forms a part, order the fine recovered
to be applied in-: defraying the expenses properly incured in the prosecution. in payment of
compensation to the victim who has suffered a "loss” or “injury” by an offence, if such
person is entitled to it in a civil court. Section 357A (Inserted Vide Code of Criminal
Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008, effective from 31.12.2009) Victim compensation
scheme-: Existing provisions of the Code for compensation were not able to scnv the purpose
in favour of the victim, section 357A was inserted which mandates the State Government to
prepare a scheme Victim Compensation Scheme in coordination with the Central government
to provide for a fund to compensate the victims of crime. Section 357 A of CrPC confers a
duty on the court to apply its mind to the question of compensation as well as rehabilitation
of victim in every criminal case whether accused is identified / traced or not, irrespective of
this fact that accused is convicted or acquitted. Section 359 Of the CrPC mandates that when
any person has been convicted in non cognizable case the court may order for the refund of
expenses incurred by the complainant in launching the prosecution.
14
choice to assist the public prosecutor. Section 26(A) of the code provides that offence under
section 376 and 376 (A) to 376 (E) of the Indian penal code shall he tried as far as practicable
by a court presided over by a woman. Section 157 second proviso of the Code of Criminal
Procedure ensures the privacy of a rape victim which provides that the statement of the rape
victim will be recorded at the residence of the victim or in a place of her choice or as far as
practicable by the woman police officer in the presence of her parent or guardian or near
relative or a social worker of the nearby locality,
1. Section 173(1-A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates a specific time of three
months for the investigating agency to complete the investigation if the allegation
relates to the offence of rape of a child.
2. Section 309 provides that when inquiry or trial relates to offence under section 376 to
376 E of IPC the inquiry or trial shall he completed within period of two months from
the date of commencement of examination of witnesses.
8
Lalita Kumari vs State of U.P. and others AIR 2014 SC 187.
15
person to print or publish any matter in relation to any such proceedings, except with the
previous permission of the Court. In the case of Dinesh @ Buddha 9 and Puttaraja10 it was held
that Indicating name of victim in judgments is inappropriate. Preventing social victimisation
or ostracism of victim is object behind it.
Right to Appeal -
Section 372 Cr.P.C. gives an important right to the victim to prefer an appeal against any
order passed by the court acquitting the accused or convicting for a lesser offence or
imposing inadequate compensation.
9
Dinesh @ Buddha vs State of Rajasthan AIR 2006 SC 1267.
10
State of Karnataka vs Puttaraja AIR 2004 SC 433.
11
Pooran vs Ramvilas (200l)6SCC 338.
16
OTHER PROVISIONS TO PROTECT SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF VICTIMS
There are also significant developments in the form of new laws to promote the cause of
victims and to mitigate the sufferings of potential victims of vulnerable sections of the
population such as women,children and elders. The enactments passed by parliaments have a
significant bearing in preventing victmization and giving relief to victims.
The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 -
The sole objective behind this legislation is to prevent the commission of offences of
atrocities against the members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and for
providing the reliefs and rehabilitation of the victims of such offences. Under this
Act,compensation to victims is manadatory, besides several other reliefs depending on the
types of atrocity. The victims are entitled to receive compensation ranging from Rs. 25,000/-
to Rs. 2,00,000/- depending on the gravity of the offence.
17
The Probation of Offenders Act. 1958 -
Section 5 of the Act, incorporates the idea of compensation and lays down that a Court while
directing release of an offender after admonition or on probation for good conduct, may, in its
discretion, order such person for payment of compensation, for the “loss” or "injury" caused
by his act or omission including defray the costs of proceedings.
The Maintenance and Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act 2007 -
This is also an innovative law aiming to protect elders and to prevent their abuse and
victimization, which is a growing problem in many countries, including India. Under this
law, an obligation is casted on the children or adult legal heirs to maintain their parents, or
18
senior citizens above the age of 60 years who are unable to maintain themselves out of their
own earnings, so as to enable them to lead a normal life.
12
Vishakha vs State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011.
19
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BY HIGHER JUDICIARY
The principles of victimology have foundations in the Indian Constitution particularly in the
Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy, which forms the bulwark for a
new social order in which social and economic justice shall be ensured. The humiliation or
the reputation that is suffered out can not be recompensed but then monetary compensation
will provide solace. There are plethora of judgments rendered by Apex Court giving rights to
the victims by way of compensation and rehabilitation. A significant phase in the evolution of
victimology in India was witnessed in the 1980s, through the creative judicial decisions
delivered by the Higher Courts. There are a series of decisions handed down in the 1980's and
1990’s by the Supreme Court that seemed to recognize the special right of the victim to
compensation for harm suffered either at the hands of a private criminal or in the course of
criminal justice administration.
13
Rudal Shah vs State of Bihar AIR 1983 SC 1086.
20
not exercise their statutory powers under this section as freely and liberally as they could he
desired." The Supreme Court of India carried the same impression 14 and directed all Courts to
exercise this power liberally in the matter of awarding compensation under section 357 CrPC
so as to meet ends of justice in a belter way.
Restitution of Victims -
Despite the absence of any special legislation to render just he to victims in India, the
Supreme Court has taken a proactive role and resorted to affirmative action to protect the
rights of victims of crime and abuse of power, The court has adopted the concept of
restorative Justice and awarded compensation for restitution or enhanced the amount of
compensation to victims, beginning from the 1980s, Judgments by Apex Court in Sukhdev
Singh vs. State of Punjab ,15 Balraj vs. Slate of U.P.16, Giani Ham vs. State of Haryana 17,
Baldev Singh vs. State of Punjab18 can be viewed for guidance State cannot escape from the
23
liability. In Ahluwalia's case – Hon’ble Supreme Court held that “in expanded meaning
attributed to article 21 of the Constitution, where the mate fails to protect the life of the
people, it could not escape the liability to pay compensation to the victims. Thus, it is clear
from this judgment that when the state fails in discharging this responsibility, the state must
provide means to ensure that the victims right to be compensated jot his injury is not ignored
or defeated. Under this section as freely and liberally as they could he desired." The Supreme
17
Court of India carried the same impression in case of Hart Singh vs Sukhheer Singh and
directed all Courts to exercise this power liberally in the matter of awarding compensation
under section 357 CrPC so as to meet the ends of justice in a better way. While hearing a suo
moto writ petition,19 dealing with a case of gang rape of a tribal lady Hon'ble Supreme Court
referring the judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh wherein it has been held that
“Survivors of rape should be compensated by giving them half of the property of the rapist(s)
as compensation in order to rehabilitate them in Society. Held that long-term rehabilitation is
needed.
14
Hari Singh vs Sukhbir Singh AIR1988 SSC 2127.
15
Sukhdev Singh vs State of Punjab (1982 SCC (Cr) 467).
16
Balraj vs State of U.P. (1994 SCC (Cr) 823).
17
Giani Ram vs. State of Haryana (AIR 195 SC 2452).
18
Baldev Singh vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1996 SC 372).
19
Suo Moto Writ Petition (Criminal) 24 of 2014.
21
The issuance of a notice by the Magistrate to the informant at the time of consideration of the
final report is a "must". As held and directed in "Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of
Police”20, "Union of Public Service Commission v. S. Papaiah"21 , "Sanjay Bansal v.
Jawajarla.22
Mandatory Duty Of The Court -
In "Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad (supra) the Supreme Court emphasized that victim is not to be
forgotten in criminal justice system and Section 357 CrPC should be read as imposing
mandatory duty on the Court «o apply its mind to the question of awarding compensation in
every case.
20
Bhagwant Singh vs Commissioner of Police, AIR 1985 SC 1285.
21
Union of Public Service Commission vs S Papaiah AIR 1997 SC 3876.
22
Sanjay Bansal vs Jawajarla AIR 2008 SC 207.
23
Boddhisattva Gautam vs Suhhra Chakraborty (1996) 1 SCC 490.
24
Delhi Domestic Working women vs Union of India 1995 SCC (l) 14.
25
Chairman Railway Board vs Chandrima Das, (2000) 2 SCC 465.
22
perhaps a form of judicial activism; and have been subsequently incorporated into the 2009
amendment to the CrPC, Interestingly, in the case of the State of Punjab v. Ajaib Singh 26 the
Supreme Court went a step further and granted a compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs even after
acquitting the accused.
26
State of Panjab vs Ajaib Singh (1995) 2 SCC 486.
27
Neelavati Behera vs State of Orissa & Others 1993 AIR 1960.
28
Swarn Singh vs State of Punjab 1978.
29
Uttarakhand Sangharsh Samiti vs State of U.P. (1996) (1) UPLBEC 461.
23
Monetary compensation for redressal -
In the case of D.K. Basu30 the Supreme Court held that monetary compensation for redressal by the
court is useful. It is perhaps the only effective remedy to ‘apply balm to the wounds’ of the family
members of the deceased victim, who may have been the breadwinner of the family. However
diverging from this trend, in die A K. Singh case 31, die Supreme Court set aside the High Courts order
directing the convicts to furnish compensation to the victims, holding that Rs. 10 lakh was in excess of
the required compensation for the crime. This decision was made despite the fact that state functionaries
perpetrated this crime against innocent members of a peaceful demonstration. On the other hand,in
the case of Chairman, Railway Board(supra) , where the accused was directed to pay
compensation by way of constitutional remedy: Saheli, A Woman’s Resource Centre v.
Commissioner of Police,32 Railway Board v. Chandrima Das (supra), the Supreme Court
ordered the payment of Rs. 10 lakhs as compensation to a Bangladeshi national who was
repeatedly raped by Railway employees. The Court upheld the Calcutta High Courts decision
that even as a foreign national she was entitled to the fundamental right to life in India, and
thus there was a constitutional liability to pay compensation to her. Thus, as observed the
judicial trends stated above, compensation available under a constitutional remedy has been
far more readily invoked and amounts of suitable quantum have been granted under Section
357(3) of the Cr.P.C.
30
D. K. Basu vs State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416.
31
A. K. Singh vs Uttarakhand Jan Morcha (1999) 4 SCC 476.
32
Saheli A Woman’s Resource Center vs Commissioner of Police 1990 AIR 513, 1989 SCR488.
24
CHALLENGES AND PROPOSALS FOR MEASURE FOR VICTIM IN INDIA.
It would appear that even though statutes strive to provide for the victim in their time of need
they are not operating properly as planned. Even when laws are made in favour of the victim
there are many barriers to their effective implementation. Some of these barriers includes-
1. Ineffective communication to the victim that such law and programs exists.
2. Confusion on the part of law enforcing agencies.
3. Offender's inability to pay restitution to victims.
Proposals
1. A stronger education and information mechanism may help to disseminate
information for the assistance programs available to victims.
2. The Victim should not be frustrated or re-victimized by the State or Law agencies.
3. The inclusion of the victim in procedure should be with the purpose to balance public
and private interests while improving communication between State agencies and
victims the level of need and satisfaction should be important consideration.
4. The Victim's right to participate in criminal trial should include the rights to produce
evidence, to be informed of the status of investigation, to be heard on related issues,
and to move the court to issue directions for further investigation and to be heard on
issues relating to bail and withdrawal of prosecution.
5. In addition to bolstering monetary reparations for victims, courts should also address other
needs of victims, including medical and psychological care, economic care, immediate
protection and security and long term rehabilitation.
25
6. Victim satisfaction requires, greater participation in sentencing procedure. Better treatment by
agencies of the State should be ensured so that the victims do not feel as they have been
victimized for gain by the system.
9. In selected cases, with the permission of the court, an approved voluntary organization should
be permitted to implead on behalf of the victim in court proceedings.
10. The victim has a right to be represented by an advocate and the same may be provided at the
cost of the State if the victim cannot afford a lawyer.
11. Legal services to victims may be extended to include psychiatric and medical help, interim
compensation, and protection against secondary victimization.
12. Very often, victims are expected to appear in courts for cases, which are adjourned even
without notice to them, or they are subjected to unnecessarily stressful courtroom experiences.
This should be avoided by the Courts.
13. Compensation should be a matter of right not at the mercy of the court.
26
CONCLUSION
The policy of our criminal justice system is victim-oriented and we have upto a certain extent
incorporated the idea of Compensatory Criminal Jurisprudence. In past few years, there has
been much concern expressed as to treatment of victims in criminal justice system. In
addition, the judiciary is actively involved in clarifying the Role and Rights of victims in the
courtroom. The judiciary, form its impartial perspective is in the best position to assure that
the rights of the accused are properly balanced with those of victim. Undoubtedly, Judges, on
their own, can assist victims of the crime to some extent only. Victim assistance programs
can supplement judicial efforts in this area.
The struggle by victims to gain formal rights within the criminal justice system continues on
many fronts. And, as the analysis presented above demonstrates, the obstacles that the victims
encounter, come from many quarters. Resistance from the victims' ostensible allies within the
criminal justice system tends to remain in low profile, and this gives the opportunity to
offender side to indulge in foot-dragging, non cooperation, and make objections on pragmatic
grounds. The problem arises in implementation of this policy. The provisions being
discretionary, it neither imposes a legal obligation on the Judge to order compensation in all
suitable cases to the victim of crime, nor does it require reasons to be recorded for not doing
so. Similarly, these provisions do not vest in the victims a legal right to be compensated
either by the accused or the state for loss or injury caused by the commission of the offence.
The victim remains at the mercy of discretion of the Judge for the award of compensation.
While passing an order under Section 357(3), it is imperative for the courts to look at the
liability and the capacity of the accused to pay the same amount, otherwise the very purpose
of granting an order of compensation would stand defeated. Ultimately, the efficacy of the
law and its social utility depends largely on the manner and the extent of its application by
the courts. A good law badly administrated may fail in its social purpose and if overlooked in
27
practice,will fail its purpose and utility. Sec 357 and 357 A of the Cr.P.C. have a social
purpose to serve and has to be applied liberally and freely in appropriate cases.
Compensation and Rehabilitation is need of the hour in view of the violation of fundamental
rights of the victim under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Court can play a great role in
delivery of justice by awarding compensation and directions for rehabilitation of the victims.
Courts have to exercise this power liberally so as to meet the ends of justice in a better way.
Ends of justice can be served if all the stakeholders do their duty in letter and spirit of the
Indian Constitution and other relevant Statutory provisions related to compensation and
rehabilitation of victims of crime. There is need to create awareness and education programs
about these rights among all the sections of the society by organizing, Seminars and
Conferences for loss or injury caused by the commission of the offence. The victim remains
at the mercy of discretion of the Judge for the award of compensation.
While passing an order under Section 357(3), it is imperative for the courts to look at the
liability and the capacity of the accused to pay the same amount, otherwise the very purpose
of granting an order of compensation would stand defeated. Ultimately, the efficacy of the
law and its social utility depends largely on the manner and the extent of its application by
the courts. A good law badly administrated may fail in its social purpose and if overlooked in
practice,will fail its purpose and utility. Sec 357 and 357 A of the Cr.P.C. have a social
purpose to serve and has to be applied liberally and freely in appropriate cases.
Compensation and Rehabilitation is need of the hour in view of the violation of fundamental
rights of the victim under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Court can play a great role in
delivery of justice by awarding compensation and directions for rehabilitation of the victims.
Courts have to exercise this power liberally so as to meet the ends of justice in a better way.
Ends of justice can be served if all the stakeholders do their duty in letter and spirit of the
Indian Constitution and other relevant Statutory provisions related to compensation and
rehabilitation of victims of crime. There is need to create awareness and education programs
about these rights among all the sections of the society by organizing, Seminars and
Conferences.
28
“Every effect has a cause. Every consequence has an antecedent. There must be
perfect balance between the cause and effect, between the antecedent and
consequence. The law of compensation keeps up the balance, and establishes
peace, concord, equilibrium, harmony and justice in Nature."
7. Marlene- A young Meeting Victims Need: What is the role of victim compensation in
recovery.
8. Gerhard O.W. Mueller - Compensations for victim of crime: thought before action.
9. United Options 'Declaration on 'Basic 'Principles of Justice for victims of crime and
Abuse of Power, G.A. Res. 40/34,11.% 'Doc. A/RES/40/34 (Dec. 11, 1985).
12. S. Murlidharan “Rights of Victims in the Indian Criminal Justice System 2004”.
29