Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Digest) Bautista vs. COMELEC, GR No. 133840 PDF
(Digest) Bautista vs. COMELEC, GR No. 133840 PDF
(Digest) Bautista vs. COMELEC, GR No. 133840 PDF
m
canvass as part of the valid votes of petitioners the “stray votes” or the separate tallies of votes. In
er as
view of this refusal, petitioner filed a
co
eH w
Petition with the COMELEC to declare such proceedings illegal.
o.
rs e
ou urc
ISSUE:
Whether or not the proceedings of the Municipal Board of Canvassers is illegal.
o
aC s
vi y re
HELD: A stray vote is invalidated because there is no way of determining the real intention of the
voter. This is, however, not the situation in the case at bar. Factual circumstances and logic dictated
that the “Bautista” and “Efren‟ votes which were mistakenly deemed as „stray votes” refer to only
one candidate, herein petitioner. True it is, the disqualification of Edwin Bautista was not yet final
ed d
on election day. However, it is also true that the electorate of Navotas was informed of such
ar stu
disqualification. The voter had constructive as well as actual knowledge of the action of the
COMELEC delisting Edwin Bautista as a candidate for mayor.
sh is
Th
https://www.coursehero.com/file/42397654/Digest-Bautista-vs-COMELEC-GR-No-133840pdf/