Utilitarianism is a moral-ethical that decides directly from wrong by concentrating on results.

It
is a type of consequentialism. Utilitarianism holds that the most moral decision is the one that
will create the best use for the best number. This would seemingly create the best use for the best
number. Utilitarianism gives a guiding framework of decision making entrenched in the
social advantage which coordinated business towards increasingly moral behavior.
Universalism is a principle that considers the welfare and risks of all parties when thinking
about strategy choices and results. Additionally, the needs of people associated with a
choice are distinguished just as the decisions they have and the data they have to ensure
their welfare. This standard includes taking people, their requirements, and their values
seriously.
Cultural relativism is a view that holds that no culture has preferable morals over some
other, and that, thusly, there are no universal "rights" and "wrongs".
Cultural relativism is the suspicion that values and morality are culture-specific—they’re
simply what the community believes and now not the result of common reason. For
cultural relativists, due to the fact, all ethical recommendations originate inside particular
cultures, there’s no way to disregard one set of policies as incorrect or inferior to these
developed in some other cultures. Cultural relativism is also an alternatively common
moral theory. Many managers do not choose to break the law, even when doing so may
individually advantage them or their company. Managers prefer to do what is proper in
the eyes of the legal establishment. When issues arise, they ask business enterprise
lawyers to grant a legal opinion.