Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mpa 504 - Inherent Human Values
Mpa 504 - Inherent Human Values
Maneja
MPA 504
I. Introduction
Values are the guiding principles of our lives. They are essential for positive human behaviour and actions in
our daily lives. They are formed on the basis of interests, choices, needs, desires and preferences. They
have played important role in not only sociology, but also psychology, anthropology and related disciplines.
When our actions and words are aligned with our values, life feels good and we feel content, confident and
satisfied. But when our behaviours don’t match-up with our values, we sense an uneasiness that grows
inside us. This uncomfortable feeling tells us that not all is good right now. We feel out-of-sorts. These
feelings can be a source of anxiety and unhappiness. We need value in our lives to:
All of us have a constant internal battle between our beliefs and values. Sometimes, we mistake our beliefs
as values or vice versa. Beliefs are internal, while the values are external. This implies that we can pick up a
value from an external source or experience, person or thing and start living with that value inculcated in us.
But belief is an internal energy that is created on what we absorb and then it builds itself within us further
creating our thoughts, words and actions.
Our beliefs create thoughts; thoughts create emotions; emotions create actions – actions of positive values
or negative values which depend on the quality of the Belief itself. These then become internal Values.
How are values, morals and ethics inextricably tied together?
The moral values in our lives hold great importance from the point of personal, social and spiritual
development. Values, morals and ethics are inextricably tied together. The preservation of human life is the
ultimate value, a pillar of ethics and the foundation of all morality.
Values are what we learn from childhood; the ‘stuff’ we acquired from our parents and immediate
surroundings. Values are the motive power behind purposeful action. Moral values are meant for making
the quest to find the higher self an easier. Many amongst us may find it difficult to follow values such as
truthfulness, honesty, forgiveness in our lives because we have not perceived the subtle gains that come to
us by following these values. Or, maybe, we are careless to realize the importance of values in life.
Ethics, on the other hand, are how we actually do behave in the face of difficult situations that test our
moral fiber. Ethics are the code or principles on which one’s character depend. Ethics and character are
closely related. Values are essential to ethics to develop at an early age and can be instrumental to building
character.
Whereas, morals are the intrinsic beliefs developed from the value systems of how we ‘should’ behave in
any given situation. Moral values are the standards of good and evil, which govern an individual’s behaviour
and choices.
When we talk about “human values” we tend to mean important abstract ideals. Things like freedom,
equality, security, tradition and peace.
Politicians mention values all the time, while all kinds of organisations claim to put “key values” at the heart
of whatever business they are in. This makes perfect sense, as values are relevant to everything we do. They
help us to choose careers, romantic partners, homes, consumer products and the broader ideologies by
which we live.
But public debate often focuses on perceived threats to different values – while rarely recognising the
problem of really understanding the values themselves.
What does it mean, for example, for terrorism to threaten the value of “freedom”, but for national defence
measures to promote the value of “security”? What does it mean for war to threaten “peace”, but promote
“democracy”? What does it mean for Arctic oil exploration to threaten the “environment”, but promote
“wealth”.
All of these values are familiar. But they are symbolic placeholders for more concrete ideas and
assumptions, which people are often unable or unwilling to articulate.
Another complication comes from people interpreting values in different ways. We can never know
precisely what people mean by different values they say they hold. For instance, we might agree with a
friend that “equality” is very important, but we may have different ideas about what equality means in real
life situations.
We may be imagining the same ideal at an abstract level (equality of opportunity as opposed to outcomes,
for example), but our interpretation of the ideal’s application will vary.
Consider the recent firestorm over the prevalence of sexual harassment in Hollywood (and society
generally). Some people see the allegations against people like Harvey Weinstein as indicative of
widespread gender inequality. Others see them as claims of an individual’s predatory behaviour. The first
interpretation focuses on equality, whereas the second focuses on individual misconduct.
Because values are a difficult thing to study – you can’t look at them under a microscope – my research
takes an empirical approach to addressing this issue, looking instead at what people actually think and do.
In this way we can infer the presence of values from people’s judgements and behaviours.
One important factor that determines whether people act on their values is whether they have recently
been thinking about them. Someone who has spent time thinking about protection of the environment is
more likely to recycle a waste sheet of paper than someone who has been preoccupied with saving money.
The time spent thinking about protection of the environment acts as a reminder that this value is
important, which makes people mindful of it during their next opportunity to act accordingly.
Being aware of a value is not enough, however. A person also has to decide that the value fits the situation.
In wealthy industrialised nations, recycling is a common example of pro-environmental behaviour. But
other actions are at least as good for the environment, yet not often thought about.
A valuable vision
For example, we can help the environment substantially through avoiding air travel and through veganism.
But these are not things that spring to mind when people are asked to list environmentally friendly
behaviors.
This matters because a great deal depends on the concrete examples we use for values. In our research, we
refer to the concrete examples as “value instantiations”. People are more likely to exhibit a value in their
judgements of a situation and in their behaviour if they have recently been thinking of common, typical
concrete examples of a value rather than of rare, but equally valid ones.
Common examples “fit” a particular value more obviously and specifically, and can act as stronger
reminders of the value than rare examples. As we have seen, recycling is an easy and obvious fit for
protecting the environment, whereas becoming a vegan might be thought of as a more obvious fit for other
values, such as health or the treatment of animals. Its role in environmentalism gets blurred.
This kind of blurring comes from a disconnect between the abstract meaning of values and the varied ways
in which people apply them. In working to tackle environmental and social problems, we overlook the links
between values and value instantiations at our own peril.
Improving our understanding of the links will help us to better understand the role of values in our
psychology and social lives – and where they fit into human character, morality, and culture.