Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Yunita Inggris
Yunita Inggris
From table 2 above it is known that the ability of understanding Arabic both in the
experimental class and in the majority control class is in the low category with 17 students
out of 26 students. Descriptive analysis of the Arabic comprehension ability data from the
results of the pre-test experimental class majority were in the low category as many as 8
out of 13 students, while in the control class the majority were in the low category as many
as 9 students out of 13 students. The level of completeness of the control class students
measured from the KKM MIN 16 HSU was declared incomplete because all the initial values
of the students' understanding ability had not reached 60 or below the KKM.
The results of the final data analysis capability of understanding the data obtained
from the post-test experimental class and control class with the help of software SPSS version
22 for windows dihasil the data distribution post-test value understanding capabilities as
follows:
Table 3 . Post- Test Data Distribution Student Understanding Ability
N Minimum Maximum The Std. Deviation
mean
Experimentation 13 33.33 80.00 61.77 8.76655
Class
Control class 13 28.89 71.11 50.96 11,98067
Seen from table 3 shows the mean (mean) of the experimental class of 61.77 is in the
high category, while the mean in the control class of 50.96 is in the low category. The final
grades distribution of Arabic students' understanding ability of the experimental class and
control class are as follows:
Table 4. Distribution of Post-test Ability Values
Understanding of Arabic Language Students
Score Qualification completeness Class Total
E K
f % f % F %
80-100 Very high Complete 2 15.38 0 0.00 2 7.69
From table 4 above it is known that the majority of Arabic class understanding ability
in the experimental class is in the high category as many as 8 students from 13 students and 2
students in the very high category , while in the majority control class is in the low category
as many as 7 students from 13 students. The level of completeness of the experimental class
students measured from KKM MIN 16 HSU that 10 students out of 13 students were declared
complete, while in the control class there were 6 students who were declared complete (above
KKM).
The gain score is obtained from the difference in students' Arabic comprehension
ability in the post-test and pre-test. The gain score data for the experimental and control
classes is presented as follows:
Table 5. Distribution of gain score data for Arabic comprehension ability
N Minimum Maximum The Std. Deviation
mean
Experimentation 13 2.22 31.12 20.44 8.17789
Class
Control class 13 -6.67 24.45 9.10 7.89607
From the table of the gain score data above, it is known that the mean difference of
the experimental class is 20.44 and the control class is 9.10.
Pre-test normality test results of the experimental class and the control class using
the Shapiro-Wilk test .
Table 7. Test the normality of the pre-test data capabilities
understanding of the experimental class and the control class
Class Shapiro-Wilk
Statistics df Sig.
Pre-test Experimentation 973 13 074
value Class
Control class 954 13 199
Based on the table above shows that the normality test results using the Shapiro Wilk
test the significance value of the experimental class pre-test data is 0.074 and the control
class pre-test data is 0.199. Both the significance value of the control class and the
experimental class are greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that the pre-test data of students'
understanding ability are normally distributed.
The normality of the post-test data results of the experimental class and the control
class are as follows:
Table 8. Test the normality of post-test data
understanding ability
Class Shapiro-Wilk
Statistics df Sig.
Post-test Experimentation 951 13 176
score Class
Control class 954 13 199
Based on the table above shows that the significance value of the experimental class
post-test data is 0.176 and the control class post-test data is 0.199. Both the significance value
of the control class and the experimental class are greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that
the post-test data on the ability of students' understanding of Arabic subjects are normally
distributed.
The last data normality test is the gain score data, the following are the results of the
Shapiro Wilk test as follows:
Table 9. Test the normality of data gain score ability
understanding of the experimental class and the control class
Class Shapiro-Wilk
Statistics Df Sig.
Post-test Experimentation 932 13 236
score Class
Control class 955 13 398
Based on the results of the normality test above shows that the significance value of
the experimental class gain score data is 0.236 and the control class gain score data is
0.398. Both the significance value of the control class and the experimental class are greater
than 0.05, it can be concluded that the gain score data of students' understanding ability in
Arabic subjects is normally distributed.
Homogeneity test uses Levene test with the help of SPSS Version 22 for Windows
software program with a significance level of 0.05. The homogeneity test results of the
experimental class pre-test data and the control class using the Levene Statistical test the
significance value of the pre-test data of the control class and the experimental class was
0.826. This value is greater than 0.05, so the experimental class and control class pre-test data
have the same variant.
Furthermore, the results h o mogenitas Data posttest control group and the
experimental class is 0.127. This value is greater than 0.05, so the control class and
experimental class post-test data have the same variant.
Hypothesis testing is a step in determining whether a hypothesis is accepted or
rejected. The data used are pre-test and post-test data as well as the experimental and control
class gain scores . Hypothesis testing is done by independent sample t-test, by testing the
difference in the gain score of the control class.
The data analysis gain score the ability of students' understanding of the experimental
class and control class, we can see the probability values in different test results of the
experimental class and control class is 0.000 and 0.000 <0.05 then H is rejected. Thus it can
0
be seen that there is a significant difference between the results of the gain score of students'
Arabic comprehension abilities.
D. CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the data analyst has been done, it could be concluded that the
ability of students 'understanding on Arabic lessons with sub-material introductions school
supplies at MIN 16 HSU m enunjukkan there is an increase in the ability of the students'
understanding of significant ketikamenggunakan methods make a match based flash cards .
The change in the improvement of students 'understanding ability in the experimental
class of 8 majority students was in the high category and very high there were 2 students,
while the control class also slightly changed because although the majority of students'
understanding ability was still in the low category of 7 students out of 13 students, but there
are 6 students who enter the high category.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
.
AM, Sardiman. Interaction and Motivation of Teaching and Learning. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Persada, 2010.
Budiningsih, D. Asri. Study and Learning. Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2005.
Creswell, John. Educational Research Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating Qualitative and
Quantitative Research. Yogyakarta: Learning Library, 2015.
Daryanto Education Evaluation. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Eni Fariyarul and Fahyuni. Nurdiansyah. Learning Model Innovations in Accordance with 2013
Curriculum. Sidoarjo: Nizamia Learning Center, 2016.
Hasan , and. Misbahuddin. Research Data Analysis with Statistics . Jakarta: Bumi Askara, 2013.
Huda, Miftahul. Teaching and Learning Models. Yogyakarta: Learning library, 2013.
Indriana, Dina. Variety of Teaching Media Aids. Yogyakarta: DVIa Press, 2011.
Lie, Anita. Cooprativ e Learning Practicing Cooperative iv e Learning in Classrooms. Jakarta:
Gramedia, 2004.
Nasution, S. Didactic Teaching Principles. Jakarta: Bumi Askara, 2012.
Rachman, Abdul Shaleh, Madrasas and Children's Education Nation Vision, Mission and
Action Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
Sani, Ridwan Abdullah. Learning Innovation. Jakarta: Bumi Askara, 2014.
Sugiyono . Mixed Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
Sugandi, Achmad. Learning Theory. Semarang: Semarang State University Press, 2007.
Sugiono. Easy Ways to Arrange: Thesis, Thesis, and Dissertation. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
Suprijono, Agus. Cooperative e Learning: Theory and Application of PAIKEM. Surabaya: tp, 2009.
Widiasworo, Erwin. Strategies and Methods of Teaching Students Outside the Classroom (outdoor
learning) actively, creatively, inspiratively and communicatively. Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ
MEDIA, 2017.