Advice on Marriage.
@0 YOUNG LADIES.
1. ‘Do ot matty at all,
2. But you, mua eo the Boty
Men, Flits, “and the Bounders, Tailors
Piliscs cal he Foal Eee
3. Look for & Strong, Tame Man, a
Freighter. Goubgctee Wilow -Cleater, |
and Yaed Swiler. !
4, Don't except: too! much, tose]
are lazy, selfish, thoughtless, lying coe
dumy, hea , rough, ae
‘aod need taming.
5. All Bech ae and soany aie |
worse afl j
6. If you want ‘itt to be happy,
Feed the Brite
7. The same remark applies 10Bog.
8. You will be wiser not 10 ehatice
it it it worl. the isk,
|
‘A SUFFRAGETTE WIFE.
Single by Choice
happily unmarried women!
edited by
KALPANA SHARMAweft pase in nda in 2019
(as associate of Kali for Women)
7/10, First Floor, Servapriya Vihar
[New Delhi ~110 016
wna womenuninited net
Cove design: Neca Rao
typeset by Manmohan Kamar, Deli ~ 110035
and printed t Rj Press, R-3,Inderpusi, New Delhi~ 110012,
Contents
KALPANA SHARMA
introduction: Simply single
SHARDA UGRA
Stomping on the cookie-cutter
Being single snot being solitary
FRENY MANECKSHA ”
apply unmarried ever after!
BAMA 1
Uphil lows the iver
ADITI BISHNO! «
Slouching towards singledom
VINEETA BAL 7
A high happines quotien
RHEA ARAN °
A fine balance
SHERNA GANDHY 95
Single—and freeABELL MOITRA
Life around ahearth, away from home
SUIATA PATEL
Being single
Fre snglehood vows:
cmiarking upon siglo earl, with
deliberation
Contributors
Simply single
happily unmarried? West out to explore this question
lori Steinem, the renowned ferninist whose wrltings haw
nfuenced generations of women acrssthe world once dismissed
he institution of marrage a one that destivy relationship
2000, athe age of 6, sh
3 marred David Hale, Several y
ater, in 2011 na interview to The Ob
Remember my age dnt know that Tad ach
tume dt wantoget married and hve
ft was ineiabl and 40 U Kept slag not ight
Pltingitof fer feminism aden rahe: not eeryon
She went onto sy that having worked to make marriage more
equal, she was glad t have had
In India, we a
anceto take advantage oft
sila very long way fom marvagBeing single
SUJATA areL
Konarak Express heading to Bhubaneshwar. After few hours
oftrave th matriarch ofthe Marwati fam siting opposite me,
about 60 years old (she had three generations with her), whose
delectable lunch and snacks 1
adjust eaten with great rls,
asked me ist my age (I must have been around 3001 32 atthe
tum) and afer nodding wisely many times, asked, When did yo
sgetmarsed and where isyour husband? Immediately thereafter
followed another question: How many children do you have and
whois ooking ater them?
This was the first ime Thad been asked there questions and
was atalossfor words, After afew minutes of dilemma, [thought
itbest to be honest, and sald with some nonchalance (buffered
| byasmile) that didnot have children or a husband and so was
‘ot married. Immediately her face showed signs of uneasiness,
and with great concern she advised me to marry oon for ‘After
all, who will do your shraddhat” At that moment I elise that
the two of us inspite of our bonding ove fod and small talk
| were located in two diferent worlds and tha there was anal
embracing scl, intl
tual and political distance between ws
At the time, I didnot have the requisite socal or intelectual
| resources to communicate my
int of view and was dummoxedbout how andi
that manner to explain that being mated or
havinga husband and children were not important sies fr me,
and that I id not ned to explain this to anyone
[was on my way to do fldwork inthe villages of Balasore
district, Odisha Over the course of the next month and a bal
[was constantly asked the same question in the i who was
my husband and where was he? Overtime, found the requisite
answer, which helped my respondents who were marred and
had families to understand me and, most importantly. accept
me, 0 that I could continue with my research, I realised that it
was best to say that Iwas educating myself and had ver litle
time fr other things. This was an answer that [eame up within
the rt few day, which Became my refrain whenever this issue
arose. It allowed me the space t not explain my choices and
‘hereby maintain my privacy. By then, the mid-80, even in the
rural areas of Oeisha,itwas accepted that education and studying
ere important commitments (although only for males) and T
remember how in nehousehold gave this standard answer,
a young gil of about 16 looked at me shyly and longingly. and
stated, Only daughters of ich parents styingin towns have this
choice: Looking bac. it was unfortunate that didnot take her
aside to talktoher and find oat how I could helper; post-facto
regret that I didnot do what should have—comprehend her
‘urge and help er realise
‘In 2005-06, a briliant student of mine, a priest asked me:
Is sociology your calling?” When I did not understand the
import of is question he qualified it by asking,‘ this why
You are single?” and I realised that there is something here that
‘needs consideration At the time he was reflecting on the many
‘complications affecting priesthood, and wondered wither this
‘question was asked because he thought that for priesthood, he
‘needed tobe single ike Iwas, that hiss wht Being committed
to the profession ena It ths conversation with ny stadent
that recalls wrt thie esray and I wonder: why sithat being
singe is thought to be so unstal, and why i i choice that
(questions the system? Why ist seen tobe a decision that ets
Uh take the fist steps to achievernent and empowerment, and is
therefore dangerous act fra git? Why does this feat need a
specificexpanation and, depending on on ideology and subject.
postion, generate postive or negative felings and emotions,
‘whereas being marred i thought tobe natural?
Unfortunately since then have ot given myselftime to think
hrough this sue, and so Tam glad thatthe opportunity has
arisen now. For many years [thought I didnot need o explain
in choice of being single, that tsa very private matter. Today,
fs write this I think differenti; that this choice is apolitical
{nterventon and needs some analysis by activists and scholars,
and that at a scholar I should map some ofits contours,
| dort know if anyone chooses to remain single; circumstances
rake them exeris this choice ata certain point of time. In
ty case, I decided quit early in fe that if wished to nurture
1 would adopt one; that before marrying, I needed to
be employed: and thatthe frst need not follow the second
ahi
Coincident, after finding ajo, my then relationship did not
‘work out, oI started living alone and continued thus, because
by then I was clear that this is the only way I can remain
sutoniomous and unfettered from ding things with one person
allthe time—-maybe for my wholelifTalso realised that would
Tike to use my energy to establish myselfin my work/profession
(always sucha struggle fora woman of any classlcaste) rather
than deploying itto first comprehend, and ater deliberate and
negotiate diferencesinliving and being’ with partner, Tovedbeing alone and managing my own household and overtime T
became an aecomplished homemaker. And so ater some yeas,
setting married was no longera choice. However, {need toad
2 caveat; though [lived alone ina rented home for a decade
slfer made this decison, my parents shifted into my household
when they became infirm
and neededcae, andlived wth me for
alos fifteen years before they passed away in 2002 and 2013,
respectively, Those were interesting times: on the one hand T
learnt what caring was and onthe other, was exhausted by the
caring and anguished bythe slow decay in their physical and
‘ental abies, Since then, Thave agin started living alone and
appreciated andapplauded the freedom and autonomy that
now have to live in the way I wish to,
Fora woman to take adecision tobe single demands
bbeeconomicaly independent receive acceptance and legitimacy
for being single from her family and professional networks:
‘wn or make enough money to rent accommodation (generally
Aificult for single women who are not enmeshed in recognised
family or kin networks); ad has the strength to confront and
sustain herself agains the prejudice, discrimination and sexism
heaped on herby all and sundry, of bath sexes, Given that she
does notcary the visible symbols (sindhur and/or mangslsitra)
that protect her from pateiarchal interrogation, she faces
‘constant questions regarding er personal life from all manner of
‘nividualsincuding from those who provide everyday services
such as plumbers, electricians, telephone repairer, dhobis and
‘domestic workers, to professional colleagues.
‘She aso faces discrimination andlor pity at work, a6 most
institutions inthe public domain (whether headed by males or
females) are misogynous. Males at work/profesional sites do
‘ot know how to relate to single women as colleagues. (I recall
hen wasin hospital and very seriou, my male professional
hat she
calleagusat Pune University sent their wivesto enquire abou my
lth rather than come themssves.) Some think single women
gressive (womens assertiveness perceived a aggression)
hysterical, unaccommodating (beeause marriage would have
tamed women to patriarchal principles) and too demanding
constantly questioning everydy pact
demonstrate obesance to thosein authority; standing up or ther
rights and those of others. All such ideas and impressions allowe
knowing hove to
them to develop negative felings for single women, Such men
and women gossip about them, think that single women, being
sexullyunflflledaeready for one-night stands or air. Ths,
«single woman has to confront predators ofl kins, not only
those wh create obstacles to her advancement in istitations!
professions butalso those who pre on her bod: These colleagues
(Goth maleand female) can use their powerand authority within
the ffl structures to question the single womans everyday
alternate profesional practices, especally they fel threatened
byher constant assertion fr hers and other independence and
sutonomy. am sure that ike me, may single women (more than
‘martied one) have faced both inquistions and formal inuites
because oftheir insistence on being self asertive.
‘Single women nee to sstain themselves by creating lernate
support structures and new networks of friendship. However
creating these is dificult, f not imposible, given that most
individuals network and build relationships as couples, with or
without children, and operate within accepted class-based kn and
caste groups. Being singe is nt easy tsa major struggle and
doesnot come without initatingall manner of bates to maintain
‘material and psychological autonomy and freedom. Mos ofthe
time, women who are singe also support their parents and/or
stblings. tis extremely dificult fora womsan from alow income
‘background to make this choice; they ate marred very early inlife even before they can understand their agency in onder to
take such a decison,
in these circumstances, | take the statistics made popular
by the Government of Inds Ministry of Women and Child
‘Welfare, that there are about 71 milion single women in India
(an increase of almost 39 percent from the 2001 Census with
4 pinch of salt. These women are single because they may
bbe widowed, separated andior divorced or deserted by thee
husbands and/or
children, and his family, also oftentimes
discarded by ther natal fares, Demographers have informed
‘as that most women in India are married by the time they are
9, and almost 99 per cent are matied bythe time they are
30. The above statistics on singlenss relate to those who have
become single afer marrige Sach ingle women face enormous
ificabiesandvalnerabiliies material social and psychological
together with sexual harassment, prejudice and discrimination,
But one needs to distinguish tis single-ness fom the one that
‘Weare discussing inthis Book,
am now convinced that being single, that, being never-
‘arsed, is a state that questions the way the institutions of
‘artage-amily-kin organise the private domain and intersect
withthe public domain in India, The choice to remain single
not only subverts these institations and norms of beheviour
that ensure womens subordination, but affirms her agency to
constitute a distinctive and alternative lifestyle. This empowers
her to interrogate the private-pubic institutions that had ear
entangled her into accepting and legtimising her dependent
personality and reproduce her identity within he cultural ste of
‘home production also allows her to question the power that
such institutions have over he labour work friendship networks
and soca capital and over sexual choices. enables herto situate
her emotions of love, happiness and joy as also of hut, anger
nd disgust, ona completely diferent and new epster than the
fone that has, thus fr, organised emotions for married women,
“This act of subversion gives her anew agency which she is
sometimes conscious of somtimes not For women who become
aware ofthe agency, being single provides them with further
intllectual resources to extend the critique of domination and
power that they have developed a a consequence of singe-ness
and extend ito other instttions within the public domain, I
enables them to playa publicrolein analysing the way symbolic
andeultura power findsts expression in the public domain, and
to question ways in which everyday overt and covert viclence
stamps our public arenas, Ukimately, nge-nes provides one
ith imellectual resources to comprehend the true meaning of
Aiferenes, individuation, equality and democracy.
Being single therefore, finds expression In various ways,
sometimes as defiance, at other times in symbolic silence, and
at il thers, n protest. promotes an atitude of fearessness
and pluckines, and encourages daring, courage and bravery
to struggle agains all odds. It also asserts the woman as an
Independent persona an autonomous, sovereign, self-uficent
and reeindividual in contro of her body, motions, elings and
eas. Single-nes,I think, means allthis and more. This essay
explores family background an itsimperatives and combines
analysis with my personal journey to comprehend what means
to bea single woman, for me
| grew up as an only child born when my patents were in their
‘mide years 38and 4. By the they had been married for almost
two decades and were immersed in themselves, their work and
their public/poltical commitments, They were also working
parents—they would lene home at 7 30-800.m. and return at00-700 pam, sometimes even later. My only interaction with
Ahem was generally late on Saturdays (when they had half dap
work) and on Sundays
"recall as I as growing up lstening to thei conceens and
their interventions onisues concerning th experimental ont
that they were managing as principal and teacher, especies y
think unconsciously assimilated ther thoughts on ese
Pedagogy, learning, and particularly, on Gandhis views ny
‘sluation, about Gandhians and their experiments in shear
schoolsand othe such institutions. lls leant about teen,
{avoleement in many other public activities in Mumba ot
Caratand the rest ofthe county. | grew int adulthood ery.
concerned with eas governing publ domain ofthe count,
and had ite or no time for games or my peer
Not all single children of midle-aged parents invoked with
radical public concerns grow up tobe single. But my china
“wpeience st the patern for mylvingalone: My soviaoaen
‘single ld allowed me to earn to embrace fing of sone
stl love i 1
this was the,
lea
dle think tha Being alone was strange fl that
‘nly way tobe. It also made me feel that Ihave to
to depend on mysel for everything and be self sue,
andled me to earn tive wth ad ceatea word for mh
This sllence and the notion of privacy that I constencted
‘ound myselwas reinforced because ou familyhadltleer ag
interaction with my pues exended fama kin gop,
Patents had coped and got maried when they were fe eel
respectively and hod practically no contac inthe ery yes of
‘mated fe with ithe oftheir natal fanies Immediately acy
ther mariage, they got involved withthe national mowonn
sd forged deep bonds with heir compatriots fom the Congr,
Party and other radical groups, including communists. And
although by the time I was born, contact had been established
vith my motherssisterand he family, and later with my fathers
family grew up without having any clear understanding of
the enmeshed relationships of blood that organise intieate
‘in/aste groups. To me, my family was my
‘mother frends, whether young ool, whom I sometimes called
‘as(s) and masa(s), but more ofen by thee st names,
‘A chance remark bythe social historian, Ravinder Kumar,
shout Gandhi and how he created an alternate politica family
kin group, bonding youngand old women and men, ahram ites
sand party workers on public and private concerns, through bis
letters, made me understand the origin of my own family network,
"realised that by ceatinga friendship network that bonded over
Public concerns my parensand thelr fiends were alo cresting
am alteratefamiy/kin group, based on non-blood relationships
Additionally was never asked wheter I wantedto get marred
suess my parents would have found it dificult to find someone
> me given that they and thelr various friends took ther own