Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

1.

3 lm InAs=GaAs quantum-dot laser Ground-state lasing is achieved up to 120 C for the p-doped device,
with low-threshold current density and but only up to 90 C for the reference undoped laser. The inset of Fig. 2
shows ground-state lasing spectra of the p-doped laser, with lasing
negative characteristic temperature above wavelengths of 1299 and 1335 nm at RT and 100 C, respectively. The
room temperature main part of Fig. 2 shows the L–I characteristic for this device at RT,
indicating a very low RT Jth of 48 A=cm2. The present Jth is, to the best
T.J. Badcock, H.Y. Liu, K.M. Groom, C.Y. Jin, M. Gutiérrez, of our knowledge, the lowest reported value for a 1.3 mm p-type
M. Hopkinson, D.J. Mowbray and M.S. Skolnick modulation doped QD laser.
The combination of a high-growth-temperature GaAs spacer layer and
p-type modulation doping has been utilised to obtain a low-threshold-
current-density, high-temperature-stability 1.3 mm InAs=GaAs quan-
tum-dot laser. A room-temperature threshold current density of
48 A=cm2 and a negative characteristic temperature over the tempera-
ture range from 50 to 40 C is achieved for a five-layer device with
as-cleaved facets.

Introduction: Ideal quantum dot (QD) lasers are predicted to exhibit a


very low threshold current density ( Jth) and temperature-insensitive
operation [1]. However, it is found that the temperature stability of Jth
for real QD lasers, based on self-assembled QDs, around and above
room temperature (RT) is not significantly improved in comparison to Fig. 1 Dark-field (200) cross-sectional TEM image of active region of
quantum well lasers [2, 3]. One possible reason for the low character- five-layer InAs=InGaAs DWELL laser structure incorporating high-
growth-temperature GaAs spacer layers
istic temperature (T0) of QD lasers is carrier thermal excitation out of
the lasing states to higher QD states and=or states in the barriers [4].
This is expected to be particularly important for holes, owing to their
relatively small state separation. However, it has been proposed that
p-type modulation doping of the QDs may reduce the effects of hole
RT
excitation, resulting in an improved value of T0 [5, 6]. Applying this
technique, a temperature-independent Jth (T0 ¼ 1) has been experi-
mentally demonstrated for 1.3 mm InAs=GaAs QD lasers up to 100°C
output power, a.u.

 65 C [7, 8]. However, this temperature stability comes at the


expense of an increase in the absolute value of Jth [5, 7].
1260 1280 1300 1320 1340 1360
Recently, it has been shown that the growth temperature of the GaAs
l, nm
spacer layers (SPLs) in 1.3 mm multilayer InAs=GaAs QD lasers is critical
for device optimisation. In particular the use of high-growth-temperature
spacer layers (HGTSLs) inhibits dislocation formation [3, 9], resulting in RT
extremely low Jth values, e.g. 17 A=cm2 at RT for continuous-wave
Jth = 48 A/cm2
operation of a three-layer device [2]. However, the introduction
of the HGTSLs does not significantly improve the temperature stability
of Jth [2, 3]. In this Letter, it is demonstrated that the combination of
HGTSLs and p-type modulation doping results in QD lasers with a 20 40 60 80
negative T0 between 50 and 40 C and a low RT Jth of 48 A=cm2. current, mA

Fig. 2 Light against current characteristic at room temperature for p-type


Experiment: The five-layer InAs=InGaAs=GaAs dot-in-a-well doped device
(DWELL) structures were grown in a solid-source VG Semicon Cavity dimensions 3  15 mm
V90H molecular beam epitaxy system on 3 inch Si-doped GaAs Inset: Lasing spectra at room temperature and 100 C
(100) substrates. The dots were formed from 3-ML InAs grown on
2 nm In0.15Ga0.85As and covered by 6 nm In0.15Ga0.85As to give a
DWELL structure. Within the spacer layers 6 nm-thick Be doped
regions were placed 9 nm before each DWELL. The doping level
threshold current density, A/cm2

corresponds to 15 acceptors per dot. Each DWELL was separated by a undoped device
50 nm GaAs spacer layer of which the initial 15 nm was grown at p-type modulation doping device
510 C, following which the temperature was increased to 580 C for a 100
20 nm GaAs spacer layer. This growth sequence gives an HGTSL [3].
After that, the growth temperature was reduced to 510 C for the
doped regions and DWELL structure. The active region was grown at
the centre of an undoped 150 nm GaAs=AlGaAs waveguide, with n-
type lower and p-type upper 1.5 mm Al0.4Ga0.6As cladding layers. A
300 nm pþ-GaAs contact layer completed the growth. An identical
structure but with undoped spacer layers was grown for comparison
with the doped device. Devices with cavities of length 3 mm and
width 15 mm were fabricated with as-cleaved facets. Laser character-
istics were measured for pulsed current injection (5 ms, 10 kHz). 10
–250 –200 –150 –100 –50 0 50 100 150
temperature, °C
Results: Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Fig. 3 Temperature dependence of threshold current densities of p-type
images were obtained using a 200 keV JEOL-2010 microscope. The
modulation doped and undoped devices
images were recorded using dark-field conditions with a (002)
diffraction vector, providing strong chemical contrast for the zinc
blende crystal structure. A typical micrograph is shown in Fig. 1. The Fig. 3 compares the temperature dependence of Jth for the two
InAs QDs in each layer have a similar density and an average height devices over the temperature range 250 to 100 C. Between 240
of  7 nm. No defects are observed in a number of similar images, and 175 C, the temperature variation of Jth is almost identical for the
allowing an upper limit of 1  106 cm2 to be placed on the defect two devices. However, between 175 and 65 C, Jth for the p-doped
density, a result of the incorporation of the HGTSLs [3, 9]. device increases, approximately doubling from its low-temperature

ELECTRONICS LETTERS 3rd August 2006 Vol. 42 No. 16


value, whereas, over the same temperature range the undoped sample References
exhibits a significant reduction in Jth. Above 65 C, Jth for the 1 Arakawa, Y., and Sakaki, H.: ‘Multidimensional quantum well laser and
undoped device increases steadily with temperature, resulting in temperature dependence of its threshold current’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1982,
values of 31 and 115 A=cm2 at RT and 90 C, respectively. In contrast, 40, pp. 939–941
Jth for the p-doped device decreases over the range 50 to 40 C, 2 Liu, H.Y., Childs, D.T., Badcock, T.J., Groom, K.M., Sellers, I.R.,
resulting in a negative T0 at and above RT. To the best of our Hopkinson, M., Hogg, R.A., Robbins, D.J., Mowbray, D.J., and
knowledge, this is the first report of a negative T0 above RT. Although Skolnick, M.S.: ‘High-performance 3-layer 1.3 mm InAs=GaAs
at room temperature Jth for the doped device is higher than that of the quantum-dot lasers with very low continuous-wave room-temperature
undoped device (48 and 31 A=cm2, respectively) the increase (55%) is threshold currents’, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 1999, 17, pp. 1139–
relatively small, and a value of 48 A=cm2 is competitive with the best 1341
3 Liu, H.Y., Sellers, I.R., Badcock, T.J., Mowbray, D.J., Skolnick, M.S.,
quantum well laser values [10]. Above 35 C, the p-doped device has a Groom, K.M., Gutierrez, M., Hopkinson, M., Ng, J.S., David, J.P.R., and
lower Jth than the undoped device. For temperatures above  65 C the Beanland, R.: ‘Improved performance of 1.3 mm multilayer InAs=GaAs
Jths of both devices increase with approximately the same T0, indicating quantum-dot lasers using a high-growth-temperature GaAs spacer layer’,
the presence of a new loss mechanism that is unaffected by the doping. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 85, pp. 704–706
4 Shchekin, O.B., Park, G., Mo, Q., Huffaker, D.L., and Deppe, D.G.:
‘Low-threshold continuous-wave two-stack quantum-dot laser with
Conclusion: The combination of HGTSLs and p-type modulation reduced temperature sensitivity’, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 2000,
doping has been applied to five-layer 1.3 mm InAs=GaAs QD lasers. 12, pp. 1120–1122
Both a negative T0 between 50 and 40 C, and a low RT Jth of 5 Shchekin, O.B., and Deppe, D.G.: ‘1.3 mm InAs quantum dot laser with
48 A=cm2 are obtained. T0 ¼ 161 K from 0 to 80 C’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2002, 80, pp. 3277–3279
6 Shchekin, O.B., Ahn, J., and Deppe, D.G.: ‘High temperature
performance of self-organised quantum dot laser with stacked p-doped
active region’, Electron. Lett., 2002, 38, pp. 712–713
Acknowledgments: This work is supported by the UK Engineering
7 Fathpour, S., Mi, Z., Bhattacharya, P., Kovsh, A.R., Mikhrin, S.S.,
and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant no. Krestnikov, I.L., Kozhukhov, A.V., and Ledentsov, N.N.: ‘The role of
GR=S49308=01 and the EU funded SANDiE project, contract Auger recombination in the temperature-dependent output characteristics
500101. (T0 ¼ 1) of p-doped 1.3 mm quantum dot lasers’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004,
85, pp. 5164–5166
8 Marko, I.P., Masse, N.F., Sweeney, S.J., Andreev, A.D., Adams, A.R.,
# The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2006 Hatori, N., and Sugawara, M.: ‘Carrier transport and recombination in
12 May 2006 p-doped and intrinsic 1.3 mm InAs=GaAs quantum-dot lasers’, Appl.
Electronics Letters online no: 20061487 Phys. Lett., 2005, 87, pp. 211114–211116
doi: 10.1049/el:20061487 9 Liu, H.Y., Sellers, I.R., Gutierrez, M., Groom, K.M., Soong, W.M.,
T.J. Badcock, D.J. Mowbray and M.S. Skolnick (Department of Hopkinson, M., David, J.P.R., Beanland, R., Badcock, T.J., Mowbray,
M.S., and Skolnick, M.S.: ‘Influence of the spacer layer growth
Physics & Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH,
temperature on multilayer InAs=GaAs quantum dot structures’, J. Appl.
United Kingdom) Phys., 2004, 96, pp. 1988–1992
H.Y. Liu, K.M. Groom, C.Y. Jin and M. Hopkinson (Department of 10 Chand, N., Becker, E.E., van der Ziel, J.P., Chu, S.N.G., and Dutta, N.K.:
Electronic & Electrical Engineering, EPSRC National Centre for ‘Excellent uniformity and very low ( < 50 A=cm2) threshold current
III-V Technologies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United densitystrained InGaAs quantum well diode lasers on GaAs substrate’,
Kingdom) Appl. Phys. Lett., 1991, 58, pp. 1704–1706

E-mail: h.liu@sheffield.ac.uk
M. Gutiérrez (Dpto. de Ciencia de los Materiales e Ingenieria
Metalurgica, y Quimica Inorganica, Facultad de Ciencias, 11510
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain)

ELECTRONICS LETTERS 3rd August 2006 Vol. 42 No. 16

You might also like