Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 46

INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 1

FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT (STRUCTURE)

COURSE CODE BFC 43303

PROJECT TITLE STRUCTURE REPORT

SECTION 12

GROUP 2

GROUP MEMBERS KIRUBHASHNI RAVENDRAN (DF170160)

NUR FATIHIN NAJILA BINTI MOHD JAFFRI (DF170172)

FARAH ARISHA BINTI SHAHROM (DF170134)

SYAZANA AMNI BINTI ROZMI (DF170152)

FATIN ZULAIKHA BINTI OTHMAN (DF170156)

LECTURER NAME DR. KOH HENG BOON

CONTENT
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 2

NO. CONTENT PAGE

1. 1.0COMPANY AND PROJECT BACKGROUND

1.1Project Overview 3

1.2Introduction 3

1.3Mission 4

1.4Vision 4

1.5Company Profile 5

1.6Organisational Chart of The Project 6

1.7Financial Statement of Company 7-9

2. 2.0DETAILS OF PROJECT

2.1Project Name 10

2.2Duration of Project 10

2.3Cost of Project 10

11
2.4Location of Project

3. 3.0PROJECT SIGNBOARD 12

4. 4.0LISTS OF FACILITIES ON SITE 13-15

5. 5.0DESIGN CRITERIA 16

6. 6.0PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND DESIGN 17-25

7. 7.0VERIFICATION AND COMPARISON BETWEEN ESTEEM AND 26-36


MANUAL CALCULATION

8. 8.0QUANTITY SURVEYING 37-40

9. 9.0CONCLUSION 41

10. 10.0 POSTER PROJECT 42

11. 11.0APPENDIX 43-45

1.0 COMPANY AND PROJECT BACKGROUND


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 3

1.1 Project Overview

This project is a construction for the Flamingo Hotel. The project was about the
proposed to build a 4-stories hotel located on Lot 27139, Jalan Persiaran S2/B2, Seremban 2,
Mukim Rasah, Daerah Seremban, Majlis Perbandaran Seremban, Negeri Sembilan Darul
Khusus. The hotel is designed with 44 rooms, one elevator, a linen/laundry room on each
floor, administration office, meeting room, lobby and cafeteria. The building are proposed to
build on 5401 square feet area in Seremban.

1.2 Introduction

BBK Structural Engineers was established in Selangor in 1990. BBK is a full service
project delivery consultancy company offering integrated planning, architecture, engineering
and project management services for buildings, transportation, institutional and
manufacturing infrastructure with over 300 professionals in three offices which is one main
office and two branch offices.

BBK’s wide range of resources and expertise offer comprehensive and single
umbrella solutions (incorporating building design, infrastructure engineering, mechanical,
electrical and HVAC services) to technically challenging projects and services from planning
to construction, for local and national governments, private sector owners, contractors and
public sector institutions.

BBK places outmost value on its clients and offers them error-free and lower cost
designs with tight turnaround times by leveraging the resource base, cost structure and its
operation.
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 4

1.3 Mission

This company was built with a mission:

1. To perform for our customer, the highest level of quality services at fair and market
competitive prices.
2. To maintain the highest levels of professionalism, integrity, honesty and fairness in our
relationships with our suppliers, subcontractors, professional associates and customers
3. To ensure the longevity of our company through repeat and referral business achieved by
customer satisfaction in all areas including timeliness, attention to detail and service-
minded attitudes.

1.4 Vision

Be the world’s premier engineering, consultation, and project management


organization by achieving extraordinary results for our customers, building satisfying careers
for our people, and earning a fair return on the value we deliver.
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 5

1.5 Company Profile

Group Formation

Company’s Logo

Company’s Name: BBK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS

Never Let Success Get to Your Head and Never Let Failure Get to
Company’s Motto
Your Heart

No. 27-2, Jalan Putra Mahkota 7/7B, Putra Heights 47650 Subang
Company’s Address
Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Telephone: +603 5192 4433, +603 5192 6543


Company’s Contact
Fax: +603 5192 3478
E-mail: hr@bbkengineers.com

1. Everyone needs to take a fair share of the group work.


2. Every voice deserves to be heard, even if people don't agree
Company’s Ground with the point of view being expressed.
Rules 3. Respect the privacy of others in the group by not repeating
what is discussed outside of the focus group.
4. Mobiles on silent when in group meeting.
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 6

1.6 ORGANISATIONAL CHART OF THE PROJECT

PROJECT MANAGER
KIRUBASHNI
RAVENDRAN

ARCHITECT
FARAH ARISHA BINTI
SHAHROM

CIVIL & STRUCTURE GEOTECHNICAL M&E ENGINEER


ENGINEER ENGINEER NURFATIHIN NAJILA
SYAZANA AMNI BINTI FATIN ZULAIKHA BINTI MOHD JAFFRI
ROZMI BINTI OTHMAN
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 7

1.7 Financial Statement of Company

Income Statement

2017 2018 2019 2020


Gross Revenues 12,455,000 13,861,000 14,600,000 16,240,000
COGS 9,914,000 11,109,000 11,725,000 13,200,000
Gross Profit 2,541,000 2,752,000 2,875,000 3,040,000
Operating Expense (including 1,481,000 1,533,000 1,630,000 1,667,000
items below)
Operating Expenses (less items 1,295,000 1,260,000 1,295,000 1,125,000
below)
Officer’s Salaries 0 0 0 0
Depreciation 186,000 273,000 335,000 542,000
Amortization 0 0 0 0
Total Expenses 1,481,000 1,533,000 1,630,000 1,667,000
Operating Income/Loss 1,060,000 1,219,000 1,245,000 1,373,000
Interest Income 0 0 0 0
Other Income 0 0 0 0
Total Other Income 0 0 0 0
Other Expenses (-) 0 0 0 0
Interest Expense (-) (27,000) (33,000) (61,000) (71,000)
Total Other Expense (27,000) (33,000) (61,000) (71,000)

Pre-Tax Income 1,033,000 1,186,000 1,184,000 1,302,000


Income Tax Expense 320,000 310,000 440,000 375,000
Net Income After Tax 713,000 876,000 744,000 927,000
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 8

Balance Sheet

ASSETS 2017 2018 2019 2020


Current Assets
Cash 509,000 892,000 2,210,000 816,000
Short Term Investments 0 0 0 0
Accounts Receivable -Net 6,051,000 4,914,000 5,536,000 5,877,000
Inventories 0 0 0 0
WIP 0 0 0 0
Advances & Other Current Assets 367,000 551,000 499,000 592,000
Prepaid Expenses 0 0 0 0
Total Current Assets 6,927,000 6,357,000 8,245,000 7,285,000
Fixed Assets
Plant and Equipment 1,312,000 1,505,000 1,750,000 1,862,000
Buildings & Leasehold 0 0 0 0
Improvements
Land 0 0 0 0
Accumulated Depreciation (698,000) (796,000) (956,000) (1,018,000)
Net Plant Equipment 614,000 709,000 794,000 844,000
Other Intangible Assets 3,024,000 3,913,000 4,773,000 6,621,000
TOTAL ASSESTS 10,565,000 10,979,00 13,812,000 14,750,000
0
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 9

Liabilities
Current Liabilities 2017 2018 2019 2020
Accounts Payable 2,223,000 1,494,000 1,665,000 1,515,000
Other Current Liabilities 2,650,000 2,830,000 3,070,000 3,045,000
Unearned Income/Deposits 0 0 0 0
Line of Credit 0 0 0 0
Other Short Term Loans 0 0 0 0
Current Portion of Long Term 0 0 0 0
Debt
Total Current Liabilities 4,873,000 4,324,000 4,735,000 4,560,000
Long Term Liabilities
Long Term Debt 533,000 653,000 1,225,000 1,421,000
Other Liabilities 0 0 0 0
Other Loan Payable 0 0 0 0
Shareholder Loans 0 0 0 0
Short/Current Long Term Debt 0 0 0 0
Net Long Term Liabilities 533,000 653,000 1,225,000 1,421,000
Total Liabilities 5,406,000 4,977,000 5,960,000 5,981,000
STOCKHOLDER EQUITY
Common Stock 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Preferred Stock 0 0 0 0
Additional Paid In Capital 0 0 0 0
Dividends 0 0 0 0
Retained Earnings 0 0 0 0
Treasury Stock 0 0 0 0
Net Income 0 0 0 0
Other Stockholder Equity 0 0 0 0
Total Stockholder Equity 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Total Liabilities & Stockholder
Equity
0 0 0 0
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 10

2.0 DETAILS OF PROJECT

2.1 Project Name


Proposed building and setting up a ‘budget’ 6 level Hotel on Lot 27139, Jalan
Persiaran S2/B2, Seremban 2, Mukim Rasah, Daerah Seremban, Majlis Perbandaran
Seremban Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus.

2.2 Duration of Project

Duration of this project to complete is depending on the nature of the land, there may
be soil testing, site-levelling and clearing undertaken prior to actual construction. It includes
measuring out the design on the site, pouring the footings, under slab drainage, moisture
barrier and special mesh for termite protection. This includes the installation of your internal
and external support structure, along with walls, conduit for electrical and plumbing, the roof
frame and sheeting, gutters and insulation. It’s also safe for plumbers, electricians, cabinet
makers and other tradesman to begin fitting out the property. This is basically where all
painting, installations and detailing have been completed and effectively ready to move in.
It’s all take almost one year to complete.

2.3 Cost of Project

The cost estimated to build ‘budget’ 6 level Hotel on Lot 27139, Jalan Persiaran
S2/B2, Seremban 2, Mukim Rasah, Daerah Seremban, Majlis Perbandaran Seremban Negeri
Sembilan Darul Khusus is about nearly 20 million.
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 11

2.4 Location of Project

The location of this project is on Lot 27139, Jalan Persiaran S2/B2, Seremban 2,
Mukim Rasah, Daerah Seremban, Majlis Perbandaran Seremban Negeri Sembilan Darul
Khusus.

Figure 1: Satellite image of location


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 12

3.0 PROJECT SIGNBOARD


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 13

CADANGAN CADANGAN MEMBINA DAN MENYIAPKAN SEBUAH 'BUDGET'TEL HO6 TINGKAT DI


PROJEK : ATAS LOT 27139, JALAN PERSIARAN S2/B2, SEREMBAN 2, MUKI
M RASAH, DAERAH
SEREMBAN, MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEREMBAN NEGERI SEMBIL ANDARUL KHUSUS

MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEREMBAN


PEMILIK : WISMA WBS PERSIARAN FOREST HEIGHT 1 JALA
N SEREMBAN-TAMPIN,
70450 SEREMBAN, NEGERI SEMBILAN.
TEL. : 06 - 7654333

BBK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS


ARKITEK : NO. 27-2, JALAN PUTRA MAHKOTA 7/7B, PUTRA HEIG
HTS 47650, SUBANG
JAYA, SELANGOR.
TEL. : 03 -51924433 FAX : 03 - 51923478

BBK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS


JURUTERA NO. 27-2, JALAN PUTRA MAHKOTA 7/7B, PUTRA HEIG
HTS 47650, SUBANG
CIVIL & JAYA, SELANGOR.
STRUKTUR : TEL. : 03 -51924433 FAX : 03 - 51923478

BBK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS


JURUTERA NO. 27-2, JALAN PUTRA MAHKOTA 7/7B, PUTRA HEIG
HTS 47650, SUBANG
MEKANIKAL & JAYA, SELANGOR.
ELEKTRIKAL : TEL. : 03 -51924433 FAX : 03 - 51923478

MYA CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD


KONTRAKTOR : NO 2, PUSAT PERNIAGAAN MYA, JALAN SEREMB
AN - TAMPIN,71300
REMBAU, NEGERI SEMBILAN
TEL: 06 -6852058

NO. RUJ
KELULUSAN MDR/JPBL/KM/21/2020
PELAN :

TARIKH MULA 1/2/2020 TARIKH TAMAT /12/2020


PEMBINAAN : PEMBINAAN : 1
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 14

4.1 LISTS OF FACILITIES ON SITE

4.2 Hoarding

Figure 2: Elevation of Hoarding/ Gate


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 15

4.3 Advance Warning Sign

Figure 3: Example of warning sign.


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 16

4.4 Sediment Basin

Figure 4: Sediment basin on site


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 17

5.0 DESIGN CRITERIA

5.1 Design Code and Standard

Design of the data for the project carried out according with the following code and
standards:

i. BS EN 1991-1-2002, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures-Part 1-1: General


actions – Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings.
ii. MS EN 1990:2002+A1:2005, Eurocode 0 – Basis of structural design.
iii. MS EN 1991- 1-1:2010, Eurocode 1- Actions on structures – Part 1-1: General
Actions – Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings.
iv. BS EN 1992 -1-1:2004, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, General
rules and Rules for buildings.
v. MS EN 1992-1-1: 2010, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-
1: General Rules and Rules for buildings.
vi. Uniform Building (amendment) (no 2) By Laws 2012 and Malaysian
Standards MS 1183:2015: Designing of Fire Safety.

5.2 Materials and Characteristics Strength

i. The type of cement that use is Ordinary Portland Cement BS EN 197 -1-2000.
ii. The characteristics strength of the concrete is as follows below:

Characteristics strength of concrete, fck EC2 EN 1992-1-1:2004, table 3.1


Characteristics strength of steel & link, fyk EC2 EN 1992-1-1:2004,
Staircase BS EN 1990, table A1.2B
Beam and slab EC2 EN 1990, table A1.2B
Column CL 5.3.1 (7) EC2 part 142
Foundation EC7

6.0 PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND DESIGN


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 18

Structural design is the methodical investigation of the stability strength and rigidity
of structures. The basic objective in structural analysis and design is to produce a structure
capable of resisting all applied loads without failure during its intended life. The primary
purpose of a structure of a structure is to transmit or support loads. If the structure is
improperly designed fabricated, or if the actual applied loads exceed the design
specifications, the devise will probably fail to perform its intended function, with possible
serious consequences. A well-engineered structure greatly minimizes the possibility of costly
failures. A structural design project may be divided into two phases which is planning and
design.

a) Planning:
This phase involves consideration of the various requirements and factors
affecting the general layout and dimensions of the structure and results in the
choice of one or perhaps several alternative types of structure, which offer the best
general solution. The primary consideration is the function of the function of the
structure. Secondary considerations such as aesthetics, sociology, law, economics
and the environment may also be taken into account. In addition, there are
structural and constructional requirements and limitations, which may affect the
type of structure to be designed.

b) Design:
This phase involves a detailed consideration of the alternative solutions defined in
the planning phase and results in the determination of the most suitable
proportions, dimensions and details of the structural elements and connections for
constructing each alternative structural arrangement being considered.

In this project, there are five part of structure element will be design which is beam, slab,
column, staircase and foundation. All design is based on Eurocode requirements. Besides, all
design also must take consideration of material properties, loading, durability and fire
resistance.

6.1 SLAB DESIGN


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 19

Slabs are plate elements forming floors, roofs in buildings, and as the decks of bridges which
normally carry uniformly distributed loads acting normal to the plane of the slabs. Slabs can
take in many forms such as in situ solids slabs, ribbed slabs or precast unit. Slabs may span in
one direction or two directions and they may be supported on monolithic concrete beams,
steel beams, walls or directly by structure’s columns (also called suspended slab). Besides,
slabs which are not rectangular in plan or which support an irregular loading arrangement
may be analysed by using yield line method. Slabs may be simply supported or continuous
over one or more supports.

When a rectangular slab is supported only on two opposite edges, it is a one-way slab
spanning in the direction perpendicular to the edges. Precast planks fall in this groups. If a
rectangular slab is supported on all the four sides and the length-to-breadth ratio is less than
two, then it is a two-way slab. If a slab is supported on three edges or two adjacent edges,
then also it is a two-way slab.

Design procedure of slab

1. Determine design life. Fire resistance and exposure class.


2. Determine material strength
3. Calculate minimum cover for durability, fire and bond requirement
4. Estimate action on slab
5. Analyse structure to obtain critical shear forces and bending moment
6. Design flexural reinforcement
7. Check shear
8. Check deflection
9. Check cracking
10. Detailing

6.2 BEAM DESIGN


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 20

Basically, beam is the structural element which subjected to transverse load in the forms
bending moment, shear force and torsion. Therefore, beam is designed to resist all that
particular factors. Besides of that, beams are also designed to fulfil the serviceability
requirement in order to procedure an adequate and safe design.

Design procedure of beam

1. Determine design life


2. Determine preliminary beam sizing
3. Estimate actions on beam
4. Asses durability requirement and determine concrete strength
5. Determine nominal cover for durability, fire and bond requirement
6. Analysis structure to obtain critical moments and shear forces
7. Design of flexural reinforcement
8. Design of shear reinforcement
9. Verify deflection
10. Verity cracking
11. Detailing

6.3 COLUMN DESIGN


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 21

Column is a structural member that carry loads in compression along its length. Most
frequently, as in a building, the column is in a vertical position transmitting gravity loads
from its top down to its base. Columns are present in other structures as well, such in bridges,
towers, cranes. Column can be divided into two which is short column and sender column.

A short column is one whose length is relatively short in comparison to its cross-sectional
dimensions and when loaded to its extreme, fails by reaching the compressive strength of its
materials. Column end condition also need to take consideration and it will categorize to four
condition as follow:

1. Condition 1: beam depth is more than equal to column width.


2. Condition 2: beam depth less than depth about the similar plane of bending.
3. Condition 3: nominal retrain between beam and column without rotation retrains.
4. Condition 4: the peak cantilever column on the not braced structure. The end of the
column at any one or two plan in unrestrained.

Design procedure for column

1. Determine design life


2. Asses action on the column
3. Determine which combination of action apply
4. Asses durability requirement and determine concrete strength
5. Determine nominal cover for durability, fire and bond requirement
6. Analysis structure to obtain critical moments and shear forces
7. Check slenderness
8. Determine area of reinforcement required
9. Check spacing bar
10. Detailing

6.4 STAIRCASE DESIGN


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 22

A stair is a convenient means of access between the floor of a building. Constructed to


provide ready, easy, comfortable and safe ascent/descent. Besides, it also consists of a flight
of steps usually with one or more intermediate landings provided between the floor levels.
The dimension of stair should be such be such as to give the maximum comfort to the users,
which depends on the use of the building. Below shows the basic guideline of staircase:

1. Public building: R is not more than 180mm and G shall not be less than 255mm
2. Private building: R is not more than 200mm and G are varying between 250mm to
400mm

Design procedure for staircase

1. Identify type of stair case


2. Determine the raiser, going and waist.
3. Calculate average thickness
4. Calculate actions
5. Calculate moment and shear
6. Calculate main reinforcement
7. Check shear resistance
8. Check deflection
9. Check cracking
10. Detailing

6.5 FOUNDATION DESIGN


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 23

Foundation is the part of structure which transmit the loads from the structure to the
underlying soil or rock. It is usually placed below the surface of the ground. All soil compress
noticeably when loaded and caused the structure to settle. Foundation can be divided in two
categories such as shallow foundation and deep foundation. Example of shallow foundation is
pad footing, raft foundation, strip footing and strap footing while deep foundation is pad
footing. There are two essential requirements in the design of foundation which is:

1. Total settlement of the structure shall be limited to a tolerably small amount.


2. The differential settlement of various parts the structure shall be eliminated as
nearly as possible.

Pad footing are used where the oil conditions are poor and it is uneconomical, or not possible
to provide adequate spread foundations. Pad footing must extend down to firm soil so that the
load is carried by either end bearing, friction along the length of pad, or a combination of
both end bearing and friction. For this project pad footing is being used.

Procedure of pad footing design

1. Selection of pad type


2. Determine of pad footing capacity
3. Determine of pad number and spacing
4. Design of pad footing
a) Size and the thickness: < 550mm or > 550mm
b) Main reinforcement using truss theory or beam theory
5. Design for shear: punching shear is not necessary if S≤ɸ p and shear force < VRD,max
detailing:
a) diameter bar not less than 12mm
b) spacing not greater than 250mm

6.6ARCHITECTURE DRAWING
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 24

6.6.1 Identification of Beam

Figure 1 Figure 2
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 25

6.6.2 Identification of Column

Figure 3
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 26

6.6.2 Identification Qk and Gk


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 27

Figure 4

7.0 MANUAL CALCULATION

ELEMENTS CHOOSE BY MEMBERS:

SLAB
1. SYAZANA AMNI BINTI ROZMI : 7-8/A-B
2. FARAH ARISHA BINTI SHAHROM : 7-8/C-D
3. FATIN ZULAIKHA BINTI OTHMAN : 4-5/B-A
4. KIRUBHASHNI RAVENDRAN :8-9/ D-B2
5. NUR FATIHIN NAJILA BINTI MOHD JAFFRI: 7-8 / D-B2

SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM 4 (only have in gb )


1. SYAZANA AMNI BINTI ROZMI: 8/B2-D
2. NUR FATIHIN NAJILA BINTI MOHD JAFFRI : 3/ B2-C1
3. FARAH ARISHA BINTI SHAHROM: C1/6-7
4. FATIN ZULAIKHA BINTI OTHMAN: C1/3-4

CONTINUOUS BEAM
1. SYAZANA AMNI BINTI ROZMI: B2-D/5
2. FARAH ARISHA BINTI SHAHROM : 8/A-B1
3. KIRUBHASHNI RAVENDRAN : B1-A/7
4. FATIN ZULAIKHA BINTI OTHMAN :B1-A/5
5. NUR FATIHIN NAJILA BINTI MOHD JAFFRI : B1-A/3

COLUMN/FOUNDATION
1. KIRUBHASHNI RAVENDRAN : D/9
2. NUR FATIHIN NAJILA BINTI MOHD JAFFRI: A/8
3. FATIN ZULAIKHA BINTI OTHMAN :A/5
4. FARAH ARISHA BINTI SHAHROM : D/1
5. SYAZANA AMNI BINTI ROZMI : B1/1

STAIRCASE
1. KIRUBHASHNI RAVENDRAN
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 28

8.0 VERIFICATION AND COMPARISON BETWEEN ESTEEM AND MANUAL CALCULATION

BY FARAH ARISHA BINTI SHAHROM


Suspended Slab
Slab Span length Mid-span As req Slab Support As req
Cover (mm) Reinforcement Reinforcement
1b FS32 (mm) (mm²) (mm²)

3600 100 H10-600 bot 120 H10-475 top


Manual 40
1400 151 H10-425 bot 113 H10-600 top
3600 195 H10-250 bot 195 H10-250 top
Esteem 25
1400 195 H10-250 bot 195 H10-250 top

Simply Supported Beam

As required (mm2) As Provided (mm²)


Beam Cover Beam Self- Shear Reinforcement
gb21 (mm) weight Compressio Provided
Compression Tension Tension
n
Manual  30 16.2  -   75  - 113   H6-250
Esteem 25  15.6  235 235 339 339  H10-250
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 29

Continuous Beam
Dead As required (mm2) As Provided Bar Deflection
Beam Cover
Load Span
1b13 (mm) Compression Tension Compression Tension Compression Tension
(kN/m)
B1-B - 331 - 453 - 4H12
Manual 30 40.84 2.5
B-A - 530 - 679 - 6H12
Esteem 25 65.52 B1-B 312 312 339 339 3H12 3H12 6.17
B-A 313 352 339 452 3H12 4H12

Column
Bending Moment Area of Steel
Column g1(D,1) Cover (mm) Axial Force Reinforcement
Mz My Required Provided
Manual 25 923.6 -26.8 32.4 212 519 1H25
Esteem 25 942.5 -16.5 16.5 781 804 4T16

Pad Footing
Area of Footing
Area of Tension Steel Reinforcement Bar Punching Shear
Pad Cover Service (mm)
(D,1) (mm) Load, N Stress,
B H h Required Provided Force, (kN)
(N/mm2)
280
Manual 35 708.2 2800 650 2482 2613 13H16 181 0.03
0
300
Esteem 50 673.8 3000 450 3772 4050 21H16 1038 1.11
0
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 30

BY FATIN ZULAIKHA BINTI OTHMAN


Suspended Slab (4-5/A-B)
Slab Span length Mid-span As req Slab Support As req
Cover (mm) Reinforcement Reinforcement
6b FS4 (mm) (mm²) (mm²)

4000 181 H10-250 bot 181 H10-250 top


Manual 25
3600 181 H10-250 bot 181 H10-250 top
4000 181 H10-250 bot 197 H10-250 top
Esteem 25
3600 197 H10-250 bot 197 H10-250 top

Simply Supported Beam (C1/3-4)


Shear Reinforcement
As required (mm2) As Provided (mm²)
Beam Cover Beam Self- Provided
gb16 (mm) weight Compressio
Compression Tension Tension
n
Manual 35 4.5 - 333.57 - 453 4H12

Esteem 25 6.0 - 367 - 452 4H12


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 31

Continuous Beam (5/B1-A)


Dead As required (mm2) As Provided Bar Deflection
Beam Cover
Load Span
1b13 (mm) Compression Tension Compression Tension Compression Tension
(kN/m)
18.30 B1-B - 334 - 453 - 4H12
Manual 35 7.26
32.54 B-A - 633.95 - 805 - 4H16
51.70 B1-B - 368 - 452 - 4H12
Esteem 25 20.60
66.78 B-A - 457 - 603 - 3H16

Column (Manual Calculation Design on Major Axis)

Bending Moment Area of Steel


Column g2 (A,6) Cover (mm) Axial Force Reinforcement
Mz My Required Provided
4H16
Manual 35 2436.36 14.64 - 1470 1610
4H16
Esteem 25 1335.5 31.2 -9.6 452 628 8H10

Pad Footing
Area of Footing
Area of Tension Steel Punching Shear
Pad Cover Service (mm)
Reinforcement Bar
(A,5) (mm) Load, N Stress,
B H h Required Provided Force, (kN)
(N/mm2)
Manual 26 1332.40 4.0 4.0 0.65 3619 5025 25H16 1079 0.196
Esteem 50 1211.30 4.0 4.0 0.65 6858 7037 35H16 1170.02 0.380
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 32

BY KIRUBHASHNI RAVENDRAN
Suspended Slab (8-9/B2-D)
Slab Span length Mid-span As req Slab Support As req
Cover (mm) Reinforcement Reinforcement
6b FS4 (mm) (mm²) (mm²)

2500 196.7 H10-250 bot 197.6 H10-250 top


Manual 25
5400 187.0 H10-250 bot 188.0 H10-250 top
2500 212 H10-250 bot 212 H10-250 top
Esteem 25
5400 212 H10-250 bot 212 H10-250 top

Staircase

Staircase Cover(mm) Thickness(mm) As Required (mm2) As Provided (mm²) Deflection

Manual 25 179 156 6000 59.8


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 33

Continuous Beam (A-B1/7)


Dead As required (mm2) As Provided Bar Deflection
Beam Cover
Load Span
1b12 (mm) Compression Tension Compression Tension Compression Tension
(kN/m)
100.30 A-B - 353 - 175 - 6H12
Manual 35 5.40
32.54 B-B1 - 356 - 556 - H6
122.8 A-B - 353 - 175 - 6H12
Esteem 25 6.84
55.7 B-B1 - 257 - 679 - H6

Column (D/9)

Bending Moment Area of Steel


Column g2 (D,9) Cover (mm) Axial Force Reinforcement
Mz My Required Provided
1H25
Manual 35 925.7 27.4 16.8 212 4900
1H6
Esteem 25 925.7 27.4 16.8 452 210 H10

Pad Footing (D/9)


Area of Footing
Area of Tension Steel Punching Shear
Pad Cover Service (mm)
Reinforcement Bar
(D,9) (mm) Load, N Stress,
B H h Required Provided Force, (kN)
(N/mm2)
Manual 26 841.6 3.25 3.25 0.55 2024.8 71000 25H16 3500 400.0
Esteem 30 841.6 3.25 3.25 0.55 2024.8 71000 35H16 2024 351.4
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 34

BY SYAZANA AMNI BINTI ROZMI


Suspended Slab
Slab Span length Mid-span As req Slab Support As req
Cover (mm) Reinforcement Reinforcement
2b FS34 (mm) (mm²) (mm²)

4000 77 T10-350 bot 99 T10-350 top


Manual 25
3600 83 T10-350 bot 111 T10-350 top
3600 197 T10-250 bot 197 T10-250 top
Esteem 25
4000 181 T10-250 bot 197 T10-250 top

Simply Supported Beam

As required (mm2) As Provided (mm²)


Beam Cover Beam Self- Shear Reinforcement
gb21 (mm) weight Compressio Provided
Compression Tension Tension
n
Manual 35 15.12  -  1232  - 1964  H10-300
Esteem 25 12.2 241 861 339 1608  H10-250

Continuous Beam
Dead As required (mm2) As Provided Bar Deflection
Beam Cover
Load Span
2b16 (mm) Compression Tension Compression Tension Compression Tension
(kN/m)
B2-C - 280 - 452 - 4T12
Manual 30 40.84 7.52
C-D - 332 - 402 - 2T16
B2-C 365 632 452 804 3H12 3H12
Esteem 25 68.04 6.10
C-D 367 367 452 804 4T12 3T16
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 35

Column
Bending Moment Area of Steel
Column g2(B1,1) Cover (mm) Axial Force Reinforcement
Mz My Required Provided
Manual 30 1140 -20.5 15.9 285 314 4T10
Esteem 25 1221.1 -26.3 14.2 579 629 8T10

Pad Footing
Area of Footing
Area of Tension Steel Reinforcement Bar Punching Shear
Pad Cover Service (mm)
(B1,1) (mm) Load, N Stress,
B H h Required Provided Force, (kN)
(N/mm2)
325
Manual 35 822.2 3250 550 2553.2 2613 13T16 625 1.64
0
325
Esteem 50 822.2 3250 550 4485 4624 23T16 1191.71 0.89
0
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 36

BY NUR FATIHIN NAJILA BINTI MOHD JAFFRI


Suspended Slab (7-8 / D-B2)

Slab Span length Mid-span As req Slab Support As req


Cover (mm) Reinforcement Reinforcement
336b FS15 (mm) (mm²) (mm²)

3600 201 H8-250 bot 201 H8-250 top


Manual 25
5400 201 H8-250 bot 201 H8-250 top
3600 237 H8-250 bot 237 H8-250 top
Esteem 25
5400 246 H8-250 bot 246 H8-250 top

Simply Supported Beam

As required (mm2) As Provided (mm²)


Beam Cover Beam Self- Shear Reinforcement
gb17 (mm) weight Compressio Provided
Compression Tension Tension
n
Manual 25 12.34 - 773.52 - 1006 5H16
Esteem 30 16.45 - 800.23 - 1103 5H16
Continuous Beam
Dead As required (mm2) As Provided Bar Deflection
Beam Cover
Load Span
2b8 (mm) Compression Tension Compression Tension Compression Tension
(kN/m)
B1-B - 332 - 453 - 4T12
Manual 30 21.32 2.6
B-A - 1646 - 1207 - 6T12
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 37

B1-B - 571 - 657 - 4T12


Esteem 30 56.70 11.7
B-A - 2471 - 1301 - 6T12
Column
Bending Moment Area of Steel
Column g2(A,8) Cover (mm) Axial Force Reinforcement
Mz My Required Provided
1H25
Manual 25 1574.6 24.7 4.3 362 519.3
1H6
Esteem 25 1574.6 24.7 4.3 56.01 62.22 H10

Pad Footing
Area of Footing
Area of Tension Steel Reinforcement Bar Punching Shear
Pad Cover Service (mm)
(A,8) (mm) Load, N Stress,
B H h Required Provided Force, (kN)
(N/mm2)
280
Manual 35 1000 2800 400 1841 2263 50H12 861 250
0
280
Esteem 35 1124 2800 400 1273 2571 50H12 874 349
0
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 38

9.0 QUANTITY SURVEYING

9.1 Project Formwork and Concrete Costing Tables

Concrete Volume and Cost

Floor Elements Grade Volume (m³) Raw (RM) Placement (RM)


Slab 30 40.459 6,068.85 10,114.75
Beam 30 59.256 8,888.40 14,814.00
7b Column 30 17.040 2,556.00 4,260.00
RC Wall 30 4.800 720.00 1,200.00
SubTotal 121.555 18,233.25 30,388.75
Slab 30 39.465 5,919.75 9,866.25
Beam 30 63.456 9,518.40 15,864.00
6b Column 30 19.865 2,979.75 4,966.25
RC Wall 30 5.600 840.00 1,400.00
SubTotal 128.386 19,257.90 32,096.50
Slab 30 39.465 5,919.75 9,866.25
Beam 30 63.456 9,518.40 15,864.00
5b Column 30 19.865 2,979.75 4,966.25
RC Wall 30 5.600 840.00 1,400.00
SubTotal 128.386 19,257.90 32,096.50
Slab 30 39.465 5,919.75 9,866.25
Beam 30 63.456 9,518.40 15,864.00
4b Column 30 19.865 2,979.75 4,966.25
RC Wall 30 5.600 840.00 1,400.00
SubTotal 128.386 19,257.90 32,096.50
Slab 30 39.465 5,919.75 9,866.25
Beam 30 63.456 9,518.40 15,864.00
3b Column 30 19.865 2,979.75 4,966.25
RC Wall 30 5.600 840.00 1,400.00
SubTotal 128.386 19,257.90 32,096.50
Slab 30 39.465 5,919.75 9,866.25
Beam 30 63.456 9,518.40 15,864.00
2b Column 30 19.865 2,979.75 4,966.25
RC Wall 30 5.600 840.00 1,400.00
SubTotal 128.386 19,257.90 32,096.50
Slab 30 39.465 5,919.75 9,866.25
Beam 30 63.456 9,518.40 15,864.00
1b Column 30 23.847 3,577.05 5,961.75
RC Wall 30 6.720 1,008.00 1,680.00
SubTotal 133.488 20,023.20 33,372.00
Slab 30 41.275 6,191.25 10,318.75
Beam 30 55.110 8,266.50 13,777.50
gb Column 30 8.520 1,278.00 2,130.00
RC Wall 30 2.400 360.00 600.00
SubTotal 107.305 16,095.75 26,826.25
Pad 30 679.495 101,924.25 169,873.75
Foundation
Pile 30 0.000 0.00 0.00
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 39

Lean Concrete Volume and Cost

Floor Elements Lean Concrete (m³) Raw (RM) Placement (RM)


Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
7b Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
6b Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
5b Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
4b Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
2b Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
1b Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Slab 0.000 0.00 0.00
gb Beam 0.000 0.00 0.00
SubTotal 0.000 0.00 0.00
Pad 44.208 663.12 1,105.20
Foundation
Pile 0.000 0.00 0.00

Formwork Area and Cost (Exclude Opening for RC Wall)

Floor Elements Formwork Area (m²) Raw (RM) Placement (RM)


Slab 269.720 5,394.40 8,091.60
Beam 395.040 9,876.00 11,851.20
7b Column 193.800 4,845.00 5,814.00
RC Wall 48.000 1,200.00 1,440.00
SubTotal 906.560 21,315.40 27,196.80
Slab 263.315 5,266.30 7,899.45
Beam 423.040 10,576.00 12,691.20
6b Column 226.100 5,652.50 6,783.00
RC Wall 56.000 1,400.00 1,680.00
SubTotal 968.455 22,894.80 29,053.65
Slab 263.315 5,266.30 7,899.45
Beam 423.040 10,576.00 12,691.20
5b Column 226.100 5,652.50 6,783.00
RC Wall 56.000 1,400.00 1,680.00
SubTotal 968.455 22,894.80 29,053.65
4b Slab 263.315 5,266.30 7,899.45
Beam 423.040 10,576.00 12,691.20
Column 226.100 5,652.50 6,783.00
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 40

RC Wall 56.000 1,400.00 1,680.00


SubTotal 968.455 22,894.80 29,053.65
Slab 263.315 5,266.30 7,899.45
Beam 423.040 10,576.00 12,691.20
3b Column 226.100 5,652.50 6,783.00
RC Wall 56.000 1,400.00 1,680.00
SubTotal 968.455 22,894.80 29,053.65
Slab 263.315 5,266.30 7,899.45
Beam 423.040 10,576.00 12,691.20
2b Column 226.100 5,652.50 6,783.00
RC Wall 56.000 1,400.00 1,680.00
SubTotal 968.455 22,894.80 29,053.65
Slab 263.315 5,266.30 7,899.45
Beam 423.040 10,576.00 12,691.20
1b Column 271.320 6,783.00 8,139.60
RC Wall 67.200 1,680.00 2,016.00
SubTotal 1,024.875 24,305.30 30,746.25
Slab 275.160 5,503.20 8,254.80
Beam 371.180 9,279.50 11,135.40
gb Column 96.900 2,422.50 2,907.00
RC Wall 24.000 600.00 720.00
SubTotal 767.240 17,805.20 23,017.20
Pad 594.650 14,866.25 17,839.50
Foundation
Pile 0.000 0.00 0.00

9.2 Project Earth Excavation Costing Tables

Earth Excavation Volume and Cost

Floor Elements Earth Excavation (m³) Placement (RM)


Foundation Pad 2,049.922 30,748.83

9.3 Project Reinforcement Costing Tables

Bar and Cost

Floor Diameter Weight (kg) Raw (RM) Placement (RM)


T10 7,848.047 15,696.09 19,620.12
T12 2,093.228 4,186.46 5,233.07
T16 356.754 713.51 891.88
7b
T20 335.700 671.40 839.25
T25 794.340 1,588.68 1,985.85
T32 629.957 1,259.91 1,574.89
6b T10 8,362.143 16,724.29 20,905.36
T12 2,052.147 4,104.29 5,130.37
T16 286.220 572.44 715.55
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 41

T20 528.682 1,057.36 1,321.71


T25 233.819 467.64 584.55
T10 8,313.806 16,627.61 20,784.52
T12 2,114.181 4,228.36 5,285.45
5b T16 198.037 396.07 495.09
T20 546.144 1,092.29 1,365.36
T25 134.270 268.54 335.68
T10 8,315.551 16,631.10 20,788.88
T12 2,064.072 4,128.14 5,160.18
4b T16 236.165 472.33 590.41
T20 568.617 1,137.23 1,421.54
T25 134.270 268.54 335.68
T10 8,148.663 16,297.33 20,371.66
T12 2,059.428 4,118.86 5,148.57
3b T16 239.354 478.71 598.38
T20 646.524 1,293.05 1,616.31
T25 249.698 499.40 624.24
T10 8,024.136 16,048.27 20,060.34
T12 2,126.589 4,253.18 5,316.47
T16 229.413 458.83 573.53
2b
T20 483.720 967.44 1,209.30
T25 317.690 635.38 794.22
T32 353.431 706.86 883.58
T10 8,225.143 16,450.29 20,562.86
T12 2,170.033 4,340.07 5,425.08
T16 339.582 679.16 848.96
1b
T20 558.096 1,116.19 1,395.24
T25 912.471 1,824.94 2,281.18
T32 135.510 271.02 338.78
T10 6,175.997 12,351.99 15,439.99
T12 1,828.095 3,656.19 4,570.24
T16 109.430 218.86 273.57
gb
T20 258.380 516.76 645.95
T25 462.703 925.41 1,156.76
T32 552.234 1,104.47 1,380.59
R6 1,220.077 2,440.15 3,050.19
T12 93.339 186.68 233.35
Pad
T16 17,503.289 35,006.58 43,758.22
T20 22,837.122 45,674.24 57,092.80

9.4 Total Project Costing with Pad Foundation

Material Raw (RM) Placement (RM)


Concrete 252,565.95 420,943.25
Lean Concrete 663.12 1,105.20
Formwork 192,766.15 244,068.00
Earth Excavation - 30,748.83
Bar 264,812.59 331,015.74
Fabric 0.00 0.00
Total 710,807.81 1,027,881.02
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 42

10.0 CONCLUSION
Based on analysis of hotel building using ESTEEM software and manual calculation,
there is some conclusion can be made which is ESTEEM software is the most competent to
use in term of producing the most optimum structural design with respect to manual
calculation and it capable in producing the economical structural design since the amount of
reinforcement required is nearest to the manual calculation.

Besides, ESTEEM software is more efficient because it can produce design in a short
time where it can be used to double-check calculations as well as perform function with
increase accuracy and can know the design status whether fail or pass. Thus, building code
are pre-programmed, and values such as load limits and deflection are generated
automatically, freeing up your time for other aspects of the project.

In the nutshell, beam and column give the most significant change for steel cost
because both of these structural members are important in resisting building from collapse.
Moreover, floor slab is slightly costly than other because the amount of reinforcement bar
required and concrete used are greatest.

Lastly, integrated design project is very important among student because it help us to
interpret necessary engineering knowledge and improve ability to propose design solution
with specified needs with appropriate consideration for public and environmental. Thus, it
helps students to communicate effectively among group mate on complex engineering
activities with the engineering community and with society at large such as being able to
comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation.
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 43

11.0 POSTER
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 44

12.0 APPENDIX

Discussion about Project

Plan Project

12.1 MINUTES OF MEETING


INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 45

DATE ACTIVITIES

20/2/2020 1. Location: Makmal Kejuruteraan Bahan, FKAAB.


(Thursday) 2. Activities:
 Briefing on Structure Design Project by Supervisor Sir Koh Heng Boon.
 Formation of group consisted of 5 members per group.
3. To-do:
 Each members need to find architectural and structural drawing of 4-
storey building.
 Selection of suitable drawing project to be conduct on next meeting.
27/2/2020 1. Location: Makmal Kejuruteraan Bahan, FKAAB.
(Thursday) 2. Activities:
 Briefing on contents that are needed in the project report. The required
contents needed are:
i. Design of building structure by Esteem Software.
ii. Manual calculation of each structural members (beams, slabs,
columns, foundations and staircase).
iii. Work progress each weeks (minute meeting).
iv. Related structure drawings.
 The building drawings are presented to Supervisor for some guidance.
 Group members decided the project that they want to design. All agreed
to choose 4-storey hotel building project.
3. To-do:
 Group need to identify all structural member details for each floor.
 Group need to identify the suitable position of each structural members
on the drawing.
6/3/2020 1. Location: Mini Library, KKTDI.
(Friday) 2. Activities:
 Group discussed about the detail of all structural members. Details such
as imposed load on building, dimensions, etc are recorded.
 Group discussed on the suitable position of each structural members on
the drawing. The members are coloured in different colour according to
its members.
3. To-do:
 Each group members need to install Esteem Software.
 The proposed position of each structural members on the drawing to be
present to Supervisor for approval or any guidance.
12/3/2020 1. Location: Makmal Kejuruteraan Bahan, FKAAB.
(Thursday) 2. Activites:
 The proposed position of all structural members are presented to
Supervisor.
 Preliminary design on Esteem Software. Group members intended to
explore on how to design by using Esteem Software.
3. To-do:
 Group members need to find SI Report.
 Designing building using Esteem Software.
15-20/3/2020 Process with doing esteem software
INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT | 46

22-27/3/2020 Process with doing esteem software

29/3- Lost in the kitchen.


3/4/2020

5/4/2020 1. Location: KKTDI


(Sunday) 2. Activities:
 Designed building by using Esteem Software.
3. To-do:
 Keep on design.
9/4/2020 1. Location: Home (Online Meeting)
(Thursday) 2. Activities:
 Online class with Supervisor.
 Students presented work progress.
3. To-do:
 Each group members need to design structural members by manual
calculation (beams, slabs, columns, foundations, staircase).

14/4/2020 1. Location: Home


(Tuesday) 2. Activities:
 Designed building by using Esteem Software.
 Updating progress of the project.
 Group members decided/chose the structural members that they wanted
to design. (Each location of each structural members must be different)
3. To-do:
 Each members need to design structural members by manual calculation.
19/4/2020 1. Location: Home.
(Sunday) 2. Activities:
 Designed building by using Esteem Software.
 Design structural members by manual calculation. (beam)
3. To-do:
 Each members need to design structural members by manual calculation.
25/5/2020 Gathering the manual calculation and complying .

30/5/2020 Submit full report of structure

You might also like