Professional Documents
Culture Documents
National Competency Based Teacher Standards
National Competency Based Teacher Standards
TEACHER STANDARDS (NCBTS)
July 5, 2009
262 Votes
In the traditional way of teaching, the learners are only developing the lower part of the Domain
of Learning, which are identified as LOTS (lower order thinking skills). This is the memorization
intensive class, where the learners are forced to memorize a long list of items, in order to be able
to answer in the Objective Type quizzes and Exams.
Example: Using the LOTS, students would simply answer the question, “Who is the first
astronaut?”,and then a selection of a,b,c,d from which the students will choose from. These is the
Mechanical type of learning, where students would simply do the same thing (memorize) and be
able to answer the same type of exam or questioning method in a heartbeat without even
knowing the deeper part of it or can’t even explain the answer.
LOTS (lower order thinking skills) are:
Knowledge, Application, Comprehension
However, in the HOTS intensive teaching, the students would answer the types of questions like,
“What are the contribution of the Space Program to our present generation?” or “Compare and
Contrast the knowledge and understanding of humans before the space age and during the space
age?”
These types of questions, enables the learners to think critically and explain his/her answer and
to demonstrate actively in a manner that their understanding will show the deep knowledge they
have learned in the classroom.
HOTS (higher order thinking skills) are:
Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluation
With all these in mind, the Department of Education realized (at last!) that a Paradigm shift is
needed in order to change the system from the traditional ways into the so called 21st century
globally standard teacher.
Education experts around the country, including my Mentor and Dean of the College of
Education, Dr. June P. Salana, worked tirelessly together with numerous experts nationwide in
order to identify the salient points or domains needed in line with the vision of transforming the
Filipino Teacher into a globally competitive one.
Along with the Commission on Higher education (CHED), Teacher Education Institutes (TEIs),
Philippine Regulatory Commission (PRC), Department of Education (DepEd) and the Civil
Service Commission (CSC) in partnership with the different academic institution, the National
Competency-Based Teacher Standards (NCBTS) was born.
Hence, the Curriculum change is the product of many years of development, this is not the idea
of the DepEd Secretary or the thousands of teachers around the country. As mentioned by Dr.
Isagani Cruz in 2001, this is the People Power Model of Curricular Change, this is the result of
the Social Change that happened to the country and the need for education to be the Main Effort
in bringing Competitiveness and innovativeness among the people in the 21st century.
As Mentioned in the Curriculum Development book by Dr. June P. Salana and Dr. Rolando A.
Bernales, the curriculum development of today has shifted from Learner-Artisan relationship
into Employment-Oriented (knowledge based) Curriculum.
The latest trend is to Empower the teachers, the front-liners in education, the deliverers of
knowledge,and facilitators of learning in the process of developing a curriculum, that would
reflect the Competencies, teachers and students alike should possess and reflective of the Social
Dimension of education. That learning should not be limited to Fraction or Poem writing but
rather adopting it to the real life applications and experiences that the learner may or has
experienced.
It is very important to note that this is not a Jesli Lapus, Pet project that may or may not go with
him after he lives the office, but a result of the societal change, a reflection of what is happening
in the society and adopting our curriculum into the 21st century globally competent education.