Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects Theories Continued (Bullet Theory, Cultivation Theory, Spiral of Silence, Media Hegemony)
Effects Theories Continued (Bullet Theory, Cultivation Theory, Spiral of Silence, Media Hegemony)
Introduction
In continuation of the Effects theories from the previous week, this chapter
takes a look at four more theories that have been applied in the explanation of
the general effects of mass communication on the audience. The theories
under discussion here are: The Bullet theory, Cultivation theory, Spiral of
silence and Media hegemony.
This is one of the earliest theories that were used in explaining the effects of
mass communication. Based on the general state of fear, alarm and
uncertainties during the World Wars, people tended to respond en mass to
the propaganda that was being used as part of the warfare. Some media
observers and communication analysts rushed to what has been often
criticized as a 'simplistic conclusion' that communication messages produced
strong and more or less universal effects on all audience members who
happen to be exposed to such messages. In line with the idea of instant and
uniform response to communication, the theory was also known as the
'Hypodermic Needle theory' or the 'Transmission Belt theory'.
The theory implies that the mass media could influence a very large group of
people directly and uniformly by ‘shooting’ or ‘injecting’ them with messages,
which would produce a desired response immediately.
The Bullet theory was severely criticized by later researchers who argued
that:
The theory had a very limited scope of application if any. This model of
communication was likely to obtain only in situations of wars and
emergencies or in highly autocratic societies when and where
members of the audience have neither time nor platforms to make their
own decisions regarding how to respond to messages, usually from the
authorities.
It assumed that audience members were gullible and would quickly
respond to any media message they are exposed to.
It also assumed that the audience was passive and had little or no
intellectual ability to process information before reacting.
Factors such as biographic differences (e.g. age, gender, educational
qualification) and psychographic characteristics (such as attitudes,
values, emotional state) mean that different individuals are likely to
respond differently to communication messages rather than in a
uniform manner.
As more and more doubts were expressed about the validity of this theory,
some researchers (Lazersfeld et.al., 1944) conducted studies during the 1940
US presidential elections to determine whether campaign messages in the
mass media did produce instant and uniform responses from voters. They
found that contrary to the magic bullet effect, the majority of voters were not
influenced by the campaign propaganda in the mass media. Instead,
interpersonal communication such as campaign rallies and town hall meetings
had more impact on voter decision than the media.
Thus, the bullet theory was overtaken by a variety of other functional theories
such the two-step of flow theory and Diffusion of Innovations.
Today, in the era of interactive communication facilitated by new media such
as the internet, social media (tweeter, Face book, You tube) the Bullet theory
has become even more irrelevant.
Nevertheless, there are some who still believe that communication has instant
and mass impact on audiences. Some have spoken of the growing
manipulation of the human mind by powerful global TV networks and film
makers. In 1985, James Combs, a professor of political science and film
studies, warned that "Students of political communication should learn from
Orwell that in the future, communication can be used to stamp out human
minds."
Are there current situations in Pakistan and South Asia in which the
Bullet theory might apply?
How did the audience in Pakistan react to warnings in the mass media
about COVID-19 in 2020?
Cultivation Theory
"The television set has become a key member of the family, the one who tells
most of the stories most of the time." - (Gerbner et.al 1980)
Critics of the Cultivation theory argue that the studies upon which the theory is
based did not control for other variables that might have influenced the
results. They maintain that if such variables were controlled, the effect of
television in cultivation of values or habits might become minimal.
This has been described as "a theory which gives the mass media more
power than many other theories. It was developed by Elizabeth Noelle-
Neumann, and its focus is on the dynamics of public opinion. Neumann
argues that the mass media have powerful effects on public opinion because
of three characteristics: cumulation, ubiquity and consonance of opinions.
These three attributes refer to the unified or common picture of an issue that
is often presented by different media (newspapers, magazines, radio,
television networks and other media).
According to Neumann, the mass media affect this spiral of silence in three
ways:
In most Arab societies, the mass media have powerful effects on public
opinion. They are tightly controlled by government, and therefore there is not
much divergence of public opinion, especially on controversial issues. Yet, the
revolutions that are today known as the Arab Spring did take place. What
was responsible for this shift away from the spiral of silence that could have
prevailed?
Media Hegemony
The concept of 'Hegemony' is derived from Gramsci's 1971 term for a ruling
ideology. According to Karl Marx, "The history of the human race is the history
of class struggles". Societies have dominant classes, be they upper class, the
ruling class, the economic power house, the political leadership, celebrities,
experts, military power, monarchy, and the middle and lower classes. In the
global society, some countries are identified as 'superpowers', 'developed
nations', 'industrialized nations' or 'nuclear powers'. At the other end, there are
'developing', 'emerging' or even 'Third World' nations
Media Hegemony theory states that the mass media play a huge role in
making the ideas of the ruling class in society to become the ruling ideas.
The mass media, through ownership, control, content and coverage maintain
or reinforce the class structures that are already in existence. As the mass
media are controlled by the dominant class, they are used to implement the
control of the ruling class over the rest of society.
The role of the mass media in sustaining the ideology of the ruling class
(media hegemony) is based on three assumptions: