Cultural Studies

ISSN: 0950-2386 (Print) 1466-4348 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcus20

SoHo as virtual theatre: performing gender, race,

and class in 21st-century Colombia

Isis Giraldo

To cite this article: Isis Giraldo (2020): SoHo as virtual theatre: performing gender, race, and class
in 21st-century Colombia, Cultural Studies, DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2020.1755710

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2020.1755710

Published online: 27 Apr 2020.

Submit your article to this journal

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rcus20
CULTURAL STUDIES
https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2020.1755710

SoHo as virtual theatre: performing gender, race, and

class in 21st-century Colombia
Isis Giraldo
English Department, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

ABSTRACT
In this article I explore the cultural significance of SoHo, a magazine produced by
and addressed to the Colombian elite yet consumed across a wider urban social
spectrum. I carry out an analysis of the magazine in connection with the broader
political, cultural, and social context of its production and circulation during the
period it was directed by journalist Daniel Samper Ospina (2001–2015). I argue
that under Samper Ospina, SoHo played a significant role in shaping gender
ideologies in 21st-century urban Colombia. Overtly addressed to a male
audience (its title means ‘Only for Men’) and following the model of Playboy
and Esquire, SoHo operated during the period studied as a ‘virtual theatre’
where the Colombian elite converged and where a sort of education in
postmodern sensibilities of both men and women took place. Such an
educational process took the form of a double-edged performance of gender,
social class, and race: firstly, in Austin’s sense, upon the women it portrayed;
secondly, in the theatrical sense, by the (mostly male) members of the
Colombian elite that actively participated in its production. As a virtual
theatre, SoHo carries out a specific type of ideological work that seeks to
ensure cultural hegemony and, through it, the perpetuation of a system of
domination that goes back to the colonial period and whose keys are ‘the
lettered city’ and the ‘whiteness device’ (All translations are mine).

KEYWORDS SoHo; urban Colombia; performance; ideology; gender; class; distinction; race; the whiteness
device; the lettered city

1. Introduction
Entering the Colombian scene in 1999, SoHo became in 2003 – and under the
direction of Daniel Samper Ospina (2001-2015) – the first publication in the
country to offer semi-nude photographs of what they claim are ‘the prettiest
women in Colombia’ accompanied by chronicles and columns by reputed
local and international writers, journalists, intellectuals, politicians, and per-
sonalities of a diverse kind.1
Overtly conceived as a lifestyle magazine (a commercial product with high-
culture pretensions), yet, borrowing and relying heavily on the ‘cultural

CONTACT Isis Giraldo isis.giraldo@unil.ch

© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
2 I. GIRALDO

hybridity’ (García Canclini 1995) associated with Latin America at large, SoHo
positioned itself during the Samper Ospina years as one the most powerful
media in Colombia, the second most read magazine in the country in
Zuluaga and Martínez (2012), and established itself as a brand in other
countries of the region such as Argentina, Mexico, Panama, Ecuador, and
Peru (SoHo 2013). Because a large part of the Colombian cultural, economic,
and political elite were involved in its making during the period in question,
SoHo managed to attain great social weight which, in turn, granted it cultural
significance. Moreover, as part of a larger media company (Publicaciones
Semana), it managed to commodify its readership so that both its male and
female consumers were successfully converted into value (Iqani 2018,
p. 276).2 Hence, exploring SoHo, I argue, sheds light on a number of issues
that are crucial for understanding cultural hegemony and consent in the
context of Colombia because, as Chasteen puts it, ‘rule by the privileged
few [ … ] seldom succeeds for long without widespread consent’ (Chasteen
1996, p. xiii).
As a ‘process of mediation’ (Silverstone 1999, p. 13), SoHo was social, his-
torically specific, and political (1999, p. 4). Apart from aiming at being profita-
ble, it also aimed at, first, training its readers on urban global culture,
consumption, and lifestyle (Giraldo Work in progress), and second, at estab-
lishing itself as a powerful regulator of gender – the central explicit social
signifier around which the magazine organised its editorial line – and along
with it of social class and race. Despite its boisterous self-advertisement as
apolitical entertainment, the cultural work the magazine did during the
Samper Ospina era was wholly political (see also Giraldo 2020b; Forthcoming
a Work in progress). Moreover, and in line with what Jancovich suggests with
regard to Playboy, instead of ‘apolitical titillation’, SoHo’s ‘sexual materials
were not only integrated into its politics of lifestyle, but became the central
signifier of its politics’ (Jancovich 2006, p. 72).
In this article I claim that under Samper Ospina, SoHo became a scene
where a set of performances of diverse type and register took place: firstly,
of gender (and race and class) – upon and by the women who agreed to
be featured in its pages for free, despite the commercial character of the pub-
lication, and secondly, of class (and gender and race) – by those who partici-
pated in its production in one way or another. More than a tangible object
that is simply traded and consumed, I consider SoHo to be a spectacle that
spills over the material limits set by the medium to become a ‘virtual
theatre’: a theatrical scene (which is a medium itself) mediated through
another one (a magazine) and in which gender, class, and race are played
out (in the theatrical sense) and delimited (as in Austin’s speech acts theory).3
Such a spectacle, I argue, has the aim of carrying out a specific type of ideo-
logical work that seeks to ensure cultural hegemony and, through it, the per-
petuation of a system of domination that goes back to the colonial period and
 CULTURAL STUDIES 3

whose keys are ‘the lettered city’ (Rama 1996) and the ‘whiteness device’
(Castro-Gómez 2010). While the first concept refers to ‘the urban nexus of let-
tered culture and state power’ (Rama 1996) which, I argue, operates in the 21st
century through civil society, the second one to a figurative artifact based on
the high-value of whiteness (established by colonialism) and that yet trans-
cends skin colour so to encompass a person’s type of wealth and social
ranking. Indeed, being intensely implicated with modernity-coloniality
(Giraldo 2016), SoHo constitutes a paradigmatic example of the enduring con-
tinuities between colonial New Granada and postcolonial Colombia and, as
such, a powerful tool for the enacting and reinforcement of the ‘coloniality’
of power (Mignolo 2000; Quijano 2000; Castro-Gómez 2014) and of gender
(Lugones 2007; Giraldo 2016).
I start by providing a theoretical discussion that includes justification for my
drawing from the British tradition of cultural studies rather than the Latin
American one, followed by an outlining of the general theoretical framework
from within which I approach my object of study: one that sits in-between
postcolonial studies (and its focus on representation) and decolonial critical
thought (which assumes modernity to be the hidden face of coloniality).
Then I present three case studies designed to exemplify the argument.
Hence, the article has a twofold goal. A theoretical one that seeks, first, to
make a case for the recentring of ideology, understood not as ‘false conscious-
ness’ but as a set of ideas about how the world works and should work, and
second, to introduce, re-work (by integrating gender), and deploy the con-
cepts of the ‘whiteness device’ (Castro-Gómez 2010) and ‘the lettered city’
(Rama 1996) developed by two Latin American thinkers situated in the
margins of the global circuit of knowledge production. These concepts, I
argue along, are fitting to explain the continuities between the colonial and
the contemporary post-colonial world. The second goal is empirical and
aims at showing how and why SoHo (under Daniel Samper Ospina) was
crucial in the shaping of ideologies of gender, race, and social class that
have perpetuated Colombia’s highly stratified social structure which, in turn,
have outlined the political sphere.4

2. Recentring ideology and hegemonic culture

Part of my larger intellectual endeavour is to question the current ‘geopolitics
of knowledge’ (Mignolo 2008) where Anglo-American scholarly academia
occupies the dominant position (Giraldo 2016). Yet, I chose to analyse my
Colombian corpus from within a framework closer to the Birmingham
School of cultural studies, rather than follow the Latin American strand spear-
headed by Néstor García Canclini and Jesús Martín Barbero, prominent scho-
lars whose work has transcended geographical and linguistic borders.
4 I. GIRALDO

Both García Canclini and Martín Barbero are interested in reading mass
culture as communication. Their approach puts the emphasis on the potenti-
ality of culture as a space for practices of symbolic production rather than as a
univocal space for the reproduction of ideology (Martín Barbero 2002, p. 213),
itself conceived in the Marxist sense of false consciousness. While García Can-
clini proposes ‘to reconceptualise consumption as a space where to think and
where the greatest part of economic, social, political, and psychological struc-
turation takes place in modern societies’ (2009, p. 16), Martín Barbero looks at
‘domination as a process of communication’ in contrast to ‘communication as
a process of domination’ (Martín Barbero 2002, p. 19).
Thus, rather than on production, both authors are interested in what
people do with the cultural artifacts they consume. Moreover, and as I
argue in detail elsewhere (Giraldo Forthcoming a), both seem sceptical of
approaches that recentre the question of power at play in consumption
and communication and of those that prioritise gender and/or race. Their per-
spective seems to present two features that Mehita Iqani identifies in some
approaches to consumption and the media: first, reticence to the idea that
the process of communication has been profoundly altered by the rise of con-
sumer culture and the logic of profit that permeates contemporary society,
and second, a sort of romanticising of the possibilities for the increasing of
cross-cultural understanding and democracy brought about by the expansion
of communication technology (2018, p. 277–278).
The focus on resistance – which entails an emphasis on what consumers do
with what they consume and is shared by both authors – is one that domi-
nates virtually all fields of research in/on Latin America and I recognise the
enormous value of such an approach. This focus is also prevalent in cultural
studies and media studies, as a glance over the table of contents of a
recent book titled Media Cultures in Latin America (Pertierra and Salazar
2020) will attest to. However, I consider that the study of cultural hegemony
(which implies to focus on production) is, as Charles Chasteen claimed back in
1996, vital for understanding the whole picture because it forces us to observe
the hegemonic power operating ‘at the level of people’s basic assumptions’
(Chasteen 1996, p. xiii). These assumptions are the ones behind the election
of political outsiders with overt misogynist, racist, homophobic, and/or
quasi-genocidal political views – such as Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro –
as heads of governments. Yet, we will not understand how these assumptions
manage to become naturalised and widespread within the social body by solely
focusing on the creative ways in which people craft identities through mass
consumption or on how ‘consumption has altered the ways and possibilities
of being a citizen’ (García Canclini 1995, p. 29).5
Hence, I situate ‘ideologies’, as Stuart Hall defined them – ‘frameworks of
thinking and calculation about the world’ (Hall 2016 (1983), p. 131) – at the
centre of my analysis. The goal of such an approach is to explore how
 CULTURAL STUDIES 5

ideologies are ‘reproduced in the so-called private institutions of civil society’,

which Hall calls ‘the theatre of consent’ and which appear as if they were
‘outside of the direct sphere of play of the State itself’ (Hall 2016 (1983),
p. 132).6 I expect to show the extent to which SoHo is a paradigmatic
example of such a space. This is important because it allows for highlighting
the relationship between a mass-culture product – now established as part of
the urban Colombian cultural imaginary – and dominant ideologies of gender,
race, social class, and sexuality that underlie consent and manifest themselves
in the political terrain.
Widespread consent with regard to a specific kind of gender ideology – shared
at both ends of the religious-conservative/secular-liberal spectrum (Giraldo
Forthcoming a) – and to high social stratification has played a major role in
recent political events of enormous significance in Colombia. Two examples
are, first, the rejection of the peace agreement between the Juan Manuel
Santos’ administration and FARC in 2016 because of ‘the gender ideology
menace’ (Giraldo 2017). Second, the blatant disregard from the part of the
urban classes for the mass-murder of thousands of poor and helpless civilians
by the army between 2002 and 2010. This can be explained, as I do in detail else-
where (Giraldo Forthcoming b), by appealing to the historical ‘affective economy’
(Ahmed 2004) that has delimited Colombian citizenship on the basis of social
positioning.
Because of Colombia’s particular political specificities – the historical perva-
siveness of violence and the length of the conflict –, research on media and dis-
course has mostly focused on how news-making and reporting frame and
intervene in the conflict (Bonilla 2002; Ayala Osorio 2006; Bonilla and Tamayo
Gómez 2007; Olave 2014) and/or on how mass-culture consumption helps
making and remaking social relations (Martín Barbero 1991, 1992). However,
research on the history of the expansion of consumer culture in the late 20th
century and the 21st, on the one hand, and on hegemonic mass popular
forms of entertainment from the side of production and from a perspective
that recentres power (Foucault 1980) – while focusing on its restrictive aspect
(potestas) rather than on its productive one (potentia) –, on the other, is yet
to be carried out in Colombia.7 This article aims at starting to bridge this gap.

3. Modernity-coloniality, the whiteness device, and the lettered city

As a media-culture product, SoHo offered patterns of behaviour (proper and
improper), ‘moral messages’, social and political ‘ideological conditioning’ all
within a package of ‘pleasurable and seductive forms of popular entertain-
ment’ (Kellner and Durham 2006, p. ix). Further, being a lifestyle magazine
whose target audience are the 21st-century urban classes in Colombia, ‘mod-
ernity’ – understood in dominant approaches as ‘the natural unfolding of
world history’ (Mignolo 2013, p. 13), a narrative of human development in
6 I. GIRALDO

which Europe is located both in the origin and at the centre and where con-
cepts such as ‘civilization’ and its derivatives – civilised/uncivilised-savage,
‘civilizing process’ (Elias 1994) are key – is a central issue.
In the advanced capitalist West, and from approaches where modernity (as
defined above) is not only humankind’s inevitable goal but its most desirable
aim, ‘lifestyle media become crucial guides to living within, and with, moder-
nity’ (Bell and Hollows 2006, p. 4). Given that under modernity the individual
(rather than the community) is the one being enhanced, understanding the
self as a project that requires constant work, regulation, and improvement
(obtained mostly through consumption) is crucial. This, in turn, demands for
‘expert knowledge and guidance’ (see Slater 1997; Bell and Hollows 2006),
which the lifestyle magazine provides.
The debate on ‘modernity’, even from non-critical approaches to it, is far
from straightforward in the context of Latin America. The quest for modernity
has been key to the historical specificities of Colombia. Although conventional
accounts and Colombian intellectual and political elites have mostly assumed
a non-critical approach to ‘modernity’ – overwhelmingly read in positive terms
and taken to be a definite goal to attain (see for instance Bushnell 1993) – the
one I take here is aligned with critical perspectives. These understand it as
being intrinsically connected to ‘coloniality’, therefore its writing as ‘moder-
nity-coloniality’.8 Both are concomitant, the latter being the hidden face of
the former. From this approach, while modernity refers to a global phenom-
enon that originated on October 12, 1492, posited Europe at the centre of the
world – ‘the Point Zero’ in Castro-Gómez’s terminology – coloniality refers to
‘the invisible threads of power that emerge in colonial situations but extend
well beyond a strictly colonial setting and period’ (Giraldo 2016, p. 161). It
refers to ‘the symbolic, invisible and indelible traces of the colonial experience’
(Giraldo 2016, p. 161).
Derived from Aníbal Quijano’s notion of the ‘coloniality of power’ (2000) – a
tool to describe the macro-sociological relations established with the colonisa-
tion of Abya Yala –, the concept of coloniality is more useful if explored, as
Castro-Gómez suggests, as a set of local, specific, and situated practices rather
than as an abstract and totalising notion (Castro-Gómez 2014, p. 79). Further,
and while acknowledging that coloniality emerges in the past, it might be
more interesting to explore how it operates in the present so that we might
understand the extent to which the contemporary moment is profoundly
marked by the colonial legacy (Castro-Gómez 2014, p. 80). This legacy manifests
itself in ideologies of gender, sexuality, race, social class, and citizenship and
impinges upon the politics of representation – in which the role of modern-
day letrados is key – and of social organisation in contemporary Colombia.
In this article I partly aim at examining this by taking SoHo as an exemplary
case in point: as a lifestyle magazine SoHo does not simply bear the marks of
such a legacy but rather invigorates and perpetuates it. Indeed, whiteness
 CULTURAL STUDIES 7

constituted the worthiest and most esteemed cultural capital for the learned
creole class in the New Granada (18th-century Colombia): first, it guaranteed
their access to the scientific and literary knowledge of the time; second, it
established the social distance between themselves and the ‘colonial other’
(Castro-Gómez 2010, p. 15).9 Hence, the dominance of creole elites over sub-
altern groups required the construction of an imaginary of whiteness that
legitimised (in the eyes of everyone) a social order around the ethnic differ-
ence (Castro-Gómez 2010, p. 73). This made of whiteness one of the corner-
stones of social organisation in 18th-century Colombia. Yet, as Castro-
Gómez (2010) convincingly argues, rather than as a discreet value in a skin-
colour palette, ‘whiteness’ was to be understood as a device that goes
beyond skin colour so as to encompass a person’s type of wealth and social
ranking (2010, p. 71). Moreover, whiteness was primarily ‘a lifestyle performed
publicly by members of the higher social strata and yearned for all other social
groups’ (Castro-Gómez 2010, p. 71).10
For my analysis of SoHo and borrowing from Castro-Gómez, I approach the
‘whiteness device’ (dispositivo de blancura) through ‘habitus’ and ‘cultural
capital’, both taken from Bourdieu (1979) and closely linked to lifestyle, dis-
tinction, and social stratification.11 Castro-Gómez is interested in the ways in
which European Enlightenment was translated and enunciated in the New
Granada and in the role of the whiteness device in this. In contrast, I am inter-
ested in exploring how ‘whiteness’ – as a device rather than skin colour and
thus encompassing ideas of race and social condition – is deployed by core
and marginal members of the lettered city in the pages of SoHo, first, as a
strategy to mark out their own distance from others and, second, as a way
to ensure the maintenance of the social order. Additionally, I am also inter-
ested in emphasising the inherent maleness of ‘the lettered city’, which,
however, operates beyond gender. Thus, in analogous manner to how a
mestizo can deploy the ‘whiteness device’ to individually benefit from the hier-
archy established along the skin-colour palette and, in turn, entrench the
power of whiteness, a woman can accommodate herself within the ‘lettered
city’ so as to benefit from it while, in turn, entrenching patriarchy.

4. Gender as SoHo’s key political signifier

In this article I am focusing on ‘the gendered dimension to mediated consu-
mer culture’ – which, some authors argue, should be given renewed attention
(Iqani 2018, p. 281) – and I am doing so from a perspective that aims at reveal-
ing ‘the links between colonialism, developmentalism and mediated consu-
mer culture’ (Iqani 2018, p. 283) in contemporary Colombia. This means that
I am reading my object of study from a discursive approach that considers
consumer culture to be ‘a product of the intersections of power, knowledge,
and communicative technologies’ (Iqani 2018, p. 279).
8 I. GIRALDO

Gender, though in connexion with social class, race, and sexuality, is SoHo’s
key political signifier. Thus, given that the magazine is a commercial product
whose main aim is the maximisation of economic profit (therefore dependent
on advertisement), its prima facie reading points to its work on the construc-
tion of a type of masculinity that mostly hinges upon (material and symbolic)
consumption and interpellates upwardly mobile individuals. Under this
premise, and following the line of women’s magazines, this would suggest
that SoHo mainly aims at tutoring men in practices of consumption while
encouraging them to approach and ‘see the marketplace as a vital tool for
self-transformation’ (Cieply 2010, p. 154)). Further, that while being overly con-
scious that the marketplace and consumption have both been usually under-
stood as ‘a gendered space defined by a female-consumer/male-producer
dichotomy’ (Cieply 2010, p. 154), SoHo follows the line of the men’s lifestyle
magazine in that it seeks to appeal to a new brand of male-consumer that
is open to new types of masculinity: the metrosexual, who adopts ‘self-care
and sartorial behaviors’ traditionally associated with femininity or homosexu-
ality in some cultures (Coad 2016, p. 1). The ‘new man’, characterised in some
accounts ‘as narcissistic and highly invested in his physical appearance’ (Gill
2003, p. 37). The ‘new lad’, who is ‘hedonistic, post-(if not anti) feminist, and
pre-eminently concerned with beer, football and shagging women’ (Gill
2003, p. 37).12
A finer reading, however, reveals a more complex picture. First, that
although explicitly addressed to men, SoHo is also implicitly addressed to
women because gender, which is relational (Connell 2005), is one of the
central signifiers around which the magazine builds its social and cultural nar-
rative (see Giraldo Forthcoming a Work in progress). Second, that there is
another type of masculinity at work in SoHo which is at odds with those
types that heavily rely on material consumption and which would constitute
the ‘hegemonic’ model (Connell 2005) in the Colombian context. This model is
embodied by a majority of male writers – most of them belonging to a close
circle of Colombian letrados – that frequently contribute to the magazine.
Moreover, this type of masculinity is also overtly and proudly embodied by
Daniel Samper Ospina (the magazine’s director during the period under
study), who is a very public and powerful figure in urban Colombia and
who – when accepting the job – undertook it as his own personal project.13
Considering gender as relational, rather than static, implies that the pattern
of ‘hegemonic masculinity’ (Connell 2005) I identify in SoHo and that, I argue,
is constantly performed by those men writing for it takes shape in relation to
subordinated models of masculinity, on the one hand, and to dominant and
subordinated models of femininity, on the other. A gender ideology in which
gender operates as a binary opposition around the male/female pairing,
which is itself an instance of coloniality at work (Giraldo 2016), is central to
SoHo both as a mass-media product and as a cultural project. Thus, in the
 CULTURAL STUDIES 9

magazine’s order of things, femaleness – which is decidedly material because

femininity is constructed as a bodily property (Gill 2007) and the female body
the focus and the locus of female subjectivity (see Giraldo Forthcoming b) – is
mostly to be associated with nature. On the other hand, maleness – consti-
tuted through consumption (of things, experiences, women, and a specific
type of female beauty) and intellectual labour – is mostly to be associated
with culture. Further, SoHo’s gender ideology is constructed and performed
around ideas of compartmentalised types of capital. While men are interpel-
lated as beings whose sense of subjecthood should depend on both econ-
omic and cultural capital (because consumption practices are in agreement
with class habitus and convey an accurate idea of class status (Featherstone
2007, p. 18), women are primarily interpellated on the basis of body capital,
though also hierarchised with regard to economic and cultural capital.
Connell (2005) defines ‘hegemonic masculinity’ as the configuration of
practice that embodies the accepted answer to the legitimacy of patriarchy
which guarantees that men retain a position of domination while women
one of subordination (2005, p. 77). This is crucial for the gender ideology
SoHo builds, supports, and seeks to maintain: one that perpetuates the
logics of patriarchy. In order to do so, their work on the regulation of
gender – which apart from relational must also be understood intersection-
ally, that is, in connection with race, social class, and sexuality – is intense.
Hence, SoHo not only sets standards with regard to how masculinity (and fem-
ininity) should be, but discredits those who fall short from those standards,
which is a vital aspect for securing hegemony (Cieply 2010, p. 152).
While the masculinity I identify in SoHo as ‘hegemonic’ is not structured
around the consumption of tangible goods but around the production and
consumption of ideas and culture, it is still closely connected with lifestyle
and with the habitus of the upper-classes. As such it further emphasises
one main issue concerning distinction: the objective distance to needs (Bour-
dieu 1979, p. 59), which in the Colombian context is also structured along
racial lines. This is paramount in a society of late literacy (Silva 2012, p. 55)
that is additionally highly hierarchised, which implies that legitimate culture
functions as cultural capital and therefore as an instrument of domination
(Bourdieu 1979, p. 252–253). Such a context is fertile ground for the intellec-
tual to play a key role in the shaping of dominant ideologies.
Under Daniel Samper Ospina, SoHo became precisely this: a space where
intellectuals imparted opinions about how the world works and should
work as well as judgements on culture, taste, behaviours, and gender,
among other things. He managed to convene a select group of reputed
local writers – which in Colombia still operate in Foucault’s sense of the ‘uni-
versal intellectual’ (1980, p. 128) –, such as Héctor Abad Faciolince, Fernando
Vallejo, Juan Gabriel Vásquez, Santiago Gamboa, etc., and from Latin America
at large, such as Rodrigo Fresán, Juan Villoro, Roberto Fontanarrosa, etc., to
10 I. GIRALDO

frequently contribute to the magazine.14 In fact, it is accepted that by the time

he left the magazine (2015), Samper Ospina had already cemented a repu-
tation as ‘the man who had managed to persuade beautiful women,
renowned writers, and a wide range of readers that discussing sex was not tas-
teless, that a nude could be erotic rather than vulgar, and that intellectuals
had interesting things to say on daily matters’ (Jet Set 2014). In other
words, and this is my close-reading of the previous quote, he had managed
to make of SoHo a place for the (mostly male) intellectuals to perform their
intellectuality in front of an audience (the readership) and, in a positive
feeding loop, increase the legitimacy they already held (in the Colombian
context) to explain and shape the social world.

5. SoHo’s gender ideology: male intellect/female body

Since gender is one of the central aspects around which SoHo as a cultural
product is constituted, it is also one on which the intellectuals writing for
the magazine constantly impart their opinions either explicitly or implicitly.
In line with the gender ideology the magazine mediates – i.e. the association
of men with culture and women with nature –, this is further extrapolated by
making the intellectual sphere a mostly male dominion, while physical spec-
tacular beauty a female one. Moreover, as that area where worthy woman-
hood is fully realised, even for those women who operate in the intellectual
realm.
SoHo’s effort to systematically connect maleness with intellect, and female-
ness with bodily materiality – which, as I claim somewhere else (Giraldo
Forthcoming a), inflects in its pages as ‘spectacular femininity’ (McRobbie
2009) – takes on different forms. First, most of those writing for the magazine
are men. For instance, the twelve editions published in 2009 (a year selected
randomly), had 28 women contributors out of 150, which amounts to around
19% of female writing contributors for the whole year. Further, many of the
columns written by women trade in gender clichés (see Ochoa 2004;
Posada 2009; Azcárate 2014, etc.) or heterosexual sex (see Ruiz-Navarro
2009; de Francisco 2013b 2013c; Guerrero 2013, etc.). The female authors
writing about sex (not only in the examples just cited) are also women that
fit the minimum beauty standards set by the magazine itself and, when
they have the body capital and agree to it, they also feature semi-nude in
some of the editions. Margarita Rosa de Francisco – ex-beauty queen,
whose body capital opened her the doors of success so that she later
became singer, actress, is now a writer and has been one of the most
popular Colombian celebrities since the late eighties – was the cover of
Edition 151 (SoHo 2012), whose theme was ‘How to get old with dignity’. Cat-
alina Ruiz-Navarro – who stands now as one the most high-profile Colombian
feminists in Latin America – was featured semi-nude in the photographs
 CULTURAL STUDIES 11

accompanying a text she wrote on the experiment she was asked to carry out
(to test six condoms), with both text and pictures clearly aimed at the explicit
sexual arousal of heterosexual male readers (Ruiz-Navarro 2009). During the
period in question, the magazine also featured a monthly column on sex
always written by a woman, usually behind a pseudonym, for a sustained
period of time: Conchita (Margarita Posada), LoLa, Alexa, June, etc.
Second, most of the women (regardless of what they do for a living) are
invited to feature in SoHo because they embody ‘spectacular femininity’
(McRobbie 2009). Apart from models, actresses and TV presenters – all of
whom need to be spectacularly feminine and beautiful to operate profession-
ally in those domains – SoHo prides itself in finding commoners that also
embody the type of beauty and femininity they trade in. Hence, plenty of
women of varied professions have been featured in SoHo: dentists, lawyers,
public servants, writers, psychologists, stock brokers, sports women, dancers,
politicians, etc. Edition 118, for instance, has a B side whose cover features a
female politician, María Fernanda Valencia, in underwear, high heels and a
blazer, promising to accept to be featured nude in SoHo’s edition 120 if she
gets elected to Bogotá’s House of Representatives. Daniel Samper Ospina,
after a short introduction where he implies they accepted her offer because
she definitely had the body capital, interviews her at length and allows her
to explain her programme (Samper Ospina 2010). It remains unclear whether
she paid the magazine for the interview since it clearly constitutes political
advertisement. According to Edition 120, she did not get enough votes
(though apparently was close) and despite SoHo’s pleading with her to
accept being featured nude anyway, she refused to do so (SoHo 2010).
Third, when it comes to women writers, they are praised for their intellec-
tual work – their capacity as subjects of thought – yet, whenever possible (i.e.
when they have the minimum body capital in SoHo scale), almost immediately
recast mainly as worthy of notice because of their embodying a femininity
that is approved of – their capacity as objects of sexual desire (SoHo 2008
2009; Ruiz-Navarro 2009). This can go even further: Edition 178, just before
Daniel Samper Ospina stepped down, features an article (which would be
worth a close-analysis) by a male writer ranking ‘the top five prettiest Colom-
bian female writers’: Margarita Posada, Carolina Cuervo, Margarita García
Robayo, Carolina Andújar, Marianne Ponsford (Palacio 2015).
Fourth, various of the ‘received’ intellectuals that contribute frequently to
the magazine find ways of addressing what they claim are their own physical
inadequacies, as opposed to their intellectual abilities, these latter being the
reason why they are what they are and do what they do. This is done in a
tone that betrays pride because in the end ‘intellectual labour’ in the Colom-
bian context is what constitutes the very essence of distinction – ‘the infinitely
varied art of setting distances’ (Bourdieu 1979, p. 70) – which in turn translates
into power along all social axes (culture is capital and hence functions as an
12 I. GIRALDO

instrument of domination (Bourdieu 1979, p. 252–253)). Examples of this also

abound.15
I will provide the close reading of a text to exemplify my argument: ‘Mi
trauma con el baile’ by Héctor Abad Faciolince, one of Colombia’s most pro-
minent and influential writers who also fulfils the role of ‘universal intellectual’.
Having dancing as its theme, the text serves Abad as an alibi to perform the
role of incompetent dancer, yet, competent intellectual (‘I cannot dance [ … ]
but I am capable of writing disquisitions on dancing’ (Abad Faciolince 2007,
p. 296)). Starting from the assumption that the human is structured around
the mind/body binary opposition, where mind has historically had the
upper-hand, the author speculates that the capacity for dancing must be
located in ‘a hidden place outside of the mind, i.e. within the pure and
mere body’ (2007, p. 296). However, given that the text is published in an
edition dedicated to music and that as worldly man Abad knows about the
social advantages of being a good dancer in the Colombian context, specially
for heterosexual courtship, he needs to adopt an attitude that appears as
humble. Thus, he claims that he ‘loves dancers because he admires them,
yet, also hates them because he envies them’ (Abad Faciolince 2007,
p. 296). Nevertheless, he undoes the compliment immediately afterwards
by making clear that the value of good dancing (which entails from the
mastery of the body) is well below the value of books (which are the
product of the mastery of the intellect):
I would trade half of my books for learning how to dance a vallenato. Would I?
No, not right now [ … ] but during one of those nights where everyone is
dancing and the prettiest woman in the party asks me to dance with her and
would love me if I do (and despise me if I don’t), then yes. In that case I
would trade six of my books for being a capable dancer (2007, p. 296).16

Hence, dancing well, even in a what in his eyes would seem a wonderfully
ideal situation – which involves attracting the party’s prettiest woman and
having the power of making her fall for him – is worth the equivalent of ‘six
of his books’, which is quite a low price. And this despite the fact that, he
claims, in his teenage years when his peers saw him dancing they would
call him ‘the robot’ and that they were right because when it comes to
dancing ‘a robot is more graceful than myself [ … ] even a Swedish man […
in fact,] a German man, would appear as skilful as a costeño if dancing by
my side’ (Abad Faciolince 2007, p. 296).
The reference to the coastline culture (costeño) is not anodyne and allows
him to explicitly address his own incapacity for dancing in racial-geographical
terms a few lines later:
[ … ] unlike the good Caribbean and Colombian dancers, I was not born in the
coast or in tierra caliente but in a hilly region that is sad and violent and far more
interested in work, resentment, and circumspection. And although I have
 CULTURAL STUDIES 13

managed to dominate those tendencies (sadness, resentment, violence), I am

still incapable of dancing in the lively and distracted way of costeños (Abad
Faciolince 2007, p. 297).

Hence, he is plainly explaining his lack of dancing skills through his geo-
graphical origins (which goes hand in hand with racial ones) and the socio-
cultural implications this entails.17 He had previously made the reader know
that his ‘wives, girlfriends, and sisters’ – these latter sharing both genetics
and socio-cultural upbringing with him – have been and are good dancers
(2007, p. 296), which adds a gendered aspect to his already racialised theo-
rising on dancing. Hence, although giving the appearance of self-depreca-
tion, what Abad does is the opposite: he is associating himself with the
pole that has the upper-hand (‘mind’) in the Western binary opposition
‘mind/body’ upon which he is basing his whole digression on dancing,
while associating his social others (women, non-whites, non-intellectual
labourers) with the inferior pole (‘body’). This is amplified by further
claims. For instance, that the utter command of the body required in
dancing constitutes ‘a going back to a state of pure nature that precedes
the development of the frontal lobe and logical reasoning, because a
dancing body is a body that returns to a kind of happy thoughtlessness’
(2007, p. 296). Since the author’s own inability to dance is one of the
markers that distinguishes him from the good dancers, whom he identifies
mostly as costeños and from tierra caliente, he is associating his racial
others with the terms I am writing in italics and their lexical fields: nature
as opposed to ‘culture’ (the terrain of the intellectual par excellence), a
sense of receding to an early stage of evolution (before the development
of the pre-frontal lobe) and before the scientific revolution (the development
of logical reasoning). In short, he is associating the capability for dancing with
human underdevelopment, a link further emphasised by another statement
about ‘dancing [being] the licence the mind grants the body to happily
return to its animal phase’ (Abad Faciolince 2007, p. 296).18 Thus, his overt
avowal of being incapable to dance goes hand in hand with his connecting
the mastery of dancing – by costeños, people from tierra caliente and women
(such as his ‘wives, girlfriends, and sisters’) – with primitivism and intellectual
immaturity, on the one hand, and with his own performance as a man of
logic, reasoning, and theory, on the other.
The strategy of self-deprecation relied on by Abad Faciolince is one that
Benwell identifies in his analysis of the men’s lifestyle magazine loaded in
which masculinity oscillates between two types: heroic, ‘represented by mus-
cularity, physical labor, outdoor settings, heroic activities, sport and violence’
(2003, p. 157), and anti-heroic, which uses ironic-knowingness ‘as a shield
against the explicit marking of masculinity’ (2003, p. 162). This ‘continual oscil-
lation between aspiring hero and anti-hero’ has the effect of ensuring ‘that a
14 I. GIRALDO

position for the magazine male is never stable enough to be available for clear
definition’ (Benwell 2003, p. 162).
While this point is also valid for SoHo, my analysis shows that the ‘politics of
irony’ here – and in contrast with what Benwell says with regard to the textual
examples he analyses from loaded – pay ‘out a clear patriarchal dividend’
(Benwell 2003, p. 162). Indeed, the constant association of men with mind
and women with body, of which Abad’s text is but one example of far too
many, has effects in this regard. Firstly, it reinforces the already outsized
power of the letrado, mostly a male that can brandish the whiteness device,
which encapsulates both class and race: it perpetuates the lettered city. Sec-
ondly, prioritizing the intellect in the construction of hegemonic masculinity
reinforces the idea that getting old and/or bald and/or fat, does not threaten
a man’s worth. Thirdly, and as a mirror effect, prioritizing the body in the con-
struction of femininity, i.e. making of ‘spectacular femininity’ (McRobbie 2009)
a bodily feature (Gill 2007), entails the broad acceptance in the social imagin-
ary that getting old and/or fat, threatens a woman’s worth. These effects are
intertwined and contribute to the same goal: to reinforce and perpetuate
patriarchy, which is intersectional by default.

6. The male intellectual performs gender, race, and class upon

the female other
I am reading the role of Colombian letrados from Castro-Gómez’s approach of
‘the point zero’ (2010). In his work on how the Enlightenment (as a process
that is global and not exclusively European) is enunciated in 18th century
New Granada, Castro-Gómez identifies the point zero as the one in which
epistemology originates (2010, p. 25). Yet, the significance of the point zero
goes beyond because it translates into ‘having the power to put in place, rep-
resent, and create a picture of the natural and social world that is recognised
as legitimate’ (Castro-Gómez 2010, p. 25). Thus, the ‘point zero’ is where con-
temporary Colombian intellectuals are located and as such evinces the conti-
nuities between colonial New Granada and post-colonial Colombia I identify
in this article.
The previous section addressed SoHo’s gender ideology focusing on a text
that exemplifies how the ‘whitened’ male intellectual locates himself in the
point zero to explain the racial and gendered structure of the world taking
dancing as an example. This section focuses on another text by an author
with a similar social positioning (a prominent whitened male intellectual)
that performs gender and social class explicitly and race implicitly upon a
female other: a profile of actress Martina García, who features as cover of
Edition 61 and stars in the film based on the novel Perder es cuestión de
método (1999) by Santiago Gamboa, who is also the author of the text in
question.
 CULTURAL STUDIES 15

Roughly structured in what I identify as four thematic sections (eight para-

graphs), the piece represents García for the audience in ways that constitute a
set of meta-performances of gender and class by the author himself (mascu-
linity and upper-class intellectual ‘labour’) and of gender, class, and sexuality
(femininity and upper-class cosmopolitanism) upon García. All these perform-
ances invoke and depend on the whiteness device.
The first section sets the tone by appealing to senses, feelings, and
manners. After inkoving diverse musical styles such as bolero, bossa nova,
cha-cha-chá and guaguancó the author chooses salsa which he says suits
García’s character because she is one of the most lively and beautiful
woman he knows. Moreover, beauty, when it comes to García, is to be under-
stood as going beyond a set of physical features, hers ‘border perfection’
(Gamboa 2005, p. 124), so as to include a way of being in the world, a sort
of ‘education of feelings’ (‘educación sentimental’), and refinement (Gamboa
2005, p. 126). This opening encapsulates the text’s main point, which is per-
forming the type of femininity SoHo is in the business of constructing in the
Colombian imaginary upon García: one that subsumes spectacular beauty
and middle-class manners and taste while rupturing the association of
female prudishness with upper-class habitus, which is part of the cultural
transformative task carried out by SoHo (see Giraldo 2020b).
Section two can be read as an exercise in (embedded) meta-represen-
tations from the part of Gamboa. Explaining the context of his two encounters
with García – both times in relation to her role in Cabrera’s film based on his
own novel –, Gamboa engages in a self-portrayal (auto-representation) as an
experienced, well-read, savvy, and travelled worldly-man, while casually
marking out the borders of the male and female spheres. The first encounter
– when García meets the film director, two of her co-stars, and Gamboa for a
reading of the film’s script – is articulated along a crucial distinction that
involves age (consistently constructed in SoHo as inescapable, yet, honourable
for men but as an inevitable misfortune for women): the four men present at
the reading (born in the fifties and sixties), are curtidos (‘weathered’), a term
that encompasses both age and worldly experience, while García (b. 1981)
is young and ‘fresh’ (Gamboa 2005, p. 126). Further, it is her freshness and
beauty (both intrinsically connected), along with the self-assurance they
provide her with, which grants García some power – made effective
through brief intimidation and silence (Gamboa 2005, p. 126) – over them.
As she read her lines Gamboa claims he saw Quica – her character in the
film – materialise in front of him. He describes Quica, as he originally con-
ceived her in the novel, as ‘a combination of angel and daemon’ and ‘prosti-
tute and fragile young-woman’ – which implies that in the author’s own
representation of the world the categories of ‘sex worker’ and ‘fragile
young-woman’ are mutually exclusive – whose role is to nuance the male pro-
tagonist Víctor Silanpa’s descent into hell (Gamboa 2005, p. 126).
16 I. GIRALDO

Gamboa moves to qualifying García’s black straight hair, round cheekbones

and cat eyes (2005, p. 126) as slightly uncanny signs that she was Quica’s rev-
elation in the flesh. This, he continues, made him think of ‘Maupassant, the
great French short story writer, who went insane when he stumbled upon
some pieces of furniture he had lost in one of his stories up for auction some-
where in Paris’ (Gamboa 2005, p. 126). This quite-out-of-the-blue reference to
French literature and culture – as his citing (and alas, misspelling) in Italian the
comments he claims the Venice press made about García at the 2004 Inter-
national Film Festival (‘bellisima [sic] essordiente’) where he met her for the
second time – serves Gamboa’s performance of class and intellectuality in
front of his readership: it allows him to show the reader that he is a sensitive,
well-read, and worldly man that is on a par with a 19th-century France writer
whose name has been securely established in the Western literary cannon for
quite a while. Yet, it does something else: it places Gamboa’s Quica in García’s
flesh at the level of Maupassant’s pieces of furniture. This – as well as the fact
that she is representing a sex worker whose job is mainly to please men –
points to the common trope of ‘woman as object’ which, despite the fact it
is rendered more complex in SoHo’s order of things (see Giraldo Forthcoming
a), still holds.
Since Quica is a sexual worker – ‘prostitute’ in Gamboa’s and SoHo’s voca-
bulary – from the lowest social strata, and the author claims the actress is the
character’s very physical crystallisation, some repair work seems necessary
because in the end, the profile is about García rather than Quica. The third
section does just this by placing all the emphasis on García’s social positioning
in the upper tiers of the social ranking. This is done by highlighting, through a
long string of cases in point, the extent to which her lifestyle is postmodern,
urban, travelled, and cosmopolitan, i.e. quite the antithesis of the lower class
Colombian sex worker’s lifestyle she represents in the film. Otherwise put: it
reassures the reader – who is also the consumer of the ten photographs
that accompany the text, which is indeed a pretext – that although she rep-
resents (is the embodiment of) a ‘prostitute’ – with all the social baggage
that term and profession entails in the Colombian imaginary – García’s
actual social positioning is a very different one altogether. The reader thus
learns that she is a vegetarian, likes Indian food and that her favourite place
to party in Bogotá is upscale Galería Café Libro. She also likes the ‘Befeeter
[sic] gin, which is made from ginger – a root she discovered in Zanzibar –
and which she uses to prepare Dry Martini, Jeanne Moreau’s, Ava Gardner’s,
and the likes, favourite cocktail’ (Gamboa 2005, p. 126). Additionally, she is
also fluent in various languages and, given she is interested in Eastern philos-
ophies, she believes in spirituality and even reincarnation (Gamboa 2005,
p. 126). While the previous section closed by placing García at the level of
Maupassant’s pieces of furniture, this one finishes by placing her at the
level of some twenty century Western cinematic divas thus making clear
 CULTURAL STUDIES 17

that García is an educated, distinguished, and cosmopolitan young woman

that has both economic and cultural capital (apart from the body capital).
The final section moves to García’s photographs which are the very reason
behind the text’s existence. Since García was invited to be cover of the edition,
these are placed in SoHo’s most important section titled ‘Símbolo Sexual’ and
portray her in a BDSM setting and attire. The sexual thematic is explicitly
suggested and thus Gamboa borrows a verse from Octavio Paz’s ‘Sunstone’
(1957) that, in very imperial fashion, sets the tone by placing García’s body
as a land to be discovered: ‘I travel your body, like the world, / your belly is
a plaza full of sun, / your breasts two churches / where blood performs its
own parallel rites’ (Paz 1957, cited in: Gamboa 2005, p. 131).19 Paz’s lines
are the compass that helps Gamboa start his travel along García’s represented
and imagined body which is there to be discovered by the photographer
(Carlos Gaviria), the writer (Gamboa), and SoHo’s readership.
By means of prosopopoeia Gamboa holds an imaginary conversation with
García’s body parts each of which becomes metonymy for her and guides him
through the hypothetical sexual encounter. Her eyes warn him that ‘if he tries
to think about anything else she will find out’; her hair – described metaphori-
cally as a fern and who metonymically and self-referentially declares ‘is my
[García’s] only vegetal part’ – orders him to ‘get lost in it’. Her breasts –
which ‘as in Paz’s poem, are two pretty churches’ and which Gamboa
praises for being small (in contrast to the dominant and class-inflected
trend in Colombia in the late nineties and early two-thousands) – tell him
to ‘prepare himself for the ritual and for the acquisition of a new faith’. Her
thighs, which he says look like an eastern silhouette, invite him to ‘rest his
head and dream they are his’. Finally, her lips tell him ‘that he does not
have to think of her if he finds that to be possible or perhaps to close his
eyes and evoke something strong because they are [she is] going to kiss
him’ (Gamboa 2005, p. 131).
Since Paz is one of the few Latin American Nobel Prize Laureates in Litera-
ture Gamboa’s invocation of Piedra de sol – whose main theme is ‘the encoun-
ter between a man and a woman’s body’ (Guerrero 2014) – serves him both as
inspiration and legitimation of his metaphorising of García’s body as a land to
be discovered, conquered, and possessed, itself a trite colonial trope. Further,
they reframe García’s representation within the context of Quica’s character: a
‘prostitute’ – a profession and cultural referent profoundly marked out by
social class and the whiteness device in the Colombian imaginary – whose
job concerns the sexual pleasing of men. Finally, Quica’s character (in both
Gamboa’s novel and Cabrera’s film), as well as García as represented by Gavir-
ia’s photographs (for SoHo’s Edition 61) and Gamboa’s profile, all constitute
paradigmatic examples of a patriarchal fantasy that subjugates the
woman’s body ‘to the imagined dominance of male phallic power’
(Edwards 2008, p. 98). They are patriarchal fantasies that derive from a socially
18 I. GIRALDO

hierarchical context, across every possible social axe, at the same time that
they further legitimise and secure the perpetuation of the very system that
allows for their existence.
All the male subjects involved with García in one way or another for the
production of SoHo’s Edition 61 – Gamboa as creator of Quica (the novel’s
character), Cabrera as director of the film based on Gamboa’s novel, Gaviria
as the photographer, and Samper Ospina as director of the magazine –
perform gender, sexuality, and class upon García while showing the extent to
which the symbolic capital of whiteness which, in 21st century Colombia is
revealed through the same means that in 18th New Granada, i.e. through ‘the
ostentation of signs that need to be exhibited publicly’ (Castro-Gómez 2010,
p. 84). This is what (whitened mestizo) Gamboa’s performance of gender and dis-
tinction (which encompasses both cultural and economic capital), on and by
himself and upon García, is about: a public ostentation of signs that allows to
locate them both in the higher tiers of the very hierarchical Colombian
society, while locating her in a subordinated position with regard to him and
the other men consuming the pictorial and written representation of her body.

7. Keeping the higher-social ground: meta-performances of class

This section’s heading hints at SoHo’s central paradox: as a product trading in
the politics of culture the magazine has both transformative and conservative
aspirations. Being a lifestyle magazine – which operated during the Samper
Ospina years as a postmodern version of conduct books (Giraldo Work in pro-
gress) – its cultural agenda has aimed at transforming old forms of behaviour
while introducing new ones. In doing so, it has also aimed at revising
approved forms of desire (Armstrong and Tennenhouse 1987) with regard
to female beauty, aspirations, and sexuality as well as the subjectivities of
both men and women. Yet, its political agenda (tacit but central to its cultural
one) aims at maintaining ‘power in the hands of already privileged groups’
(McRobbie 2005, p. 6). This point here lies at the heart of my reading of
SoHo as a virtual theatre where the performance of distinction takes place,
a reading that follows a Bourdieusian approach to ‘cultural differentiation as
a powerful means of actively proliferating divisions and inequities through
modalities of symbolic violence’ (McRobbie 2005, p. 124).
While in the previous section I discussed performances of gender (and social
class) by a male subject and upon a female object, in this section I focus on
meta-performances of class by both male and female subjects that aim at deli-
miting the social space and maintaining its (historical) hierarchies. Whereas the
performances of gender discussed above partly operated through the praising
of the hypersexualised female other – within a postfeminist framework that
aims at ensuring the entrenchment of patriarchy (Gill 2007; McRobbie 2009;
Giraldo 2020a) –, the ones discussed now function by means of shaming
 CULTURAL STUDIES 19

strategies. These strategies simultaneously derive from and effect disgust – an

aversive emotion associated with feelings of revulsion or loathing (Tyler 2013,
p. 21) – which is ‘saturated with socially stigmatising meanings and values’
(Ngai 2005, 11 cited in: Tyler 2013, p. 21). Accordingly, they serve to delimit
social spaces and/or maintain their hierarchies when certain of those spaces
are opened up to those deemed to not truly belong.
The first example comes from Edition 79 whose theme was ‘beauty’ and
which counts with one ‘humour section’, among others, entirely dedicated
to bashing the Miss Colombia. Titled ‘Nine reasons to end the national
beauty pageant’, the section hence features nine heavy weights of journalism
and opinion-making in Colombia each of whom writes a column treating
something about the event they particularly dislike. The authors of the
columns are six men and three women and although they focus on aspects
of the pageant of different type and register they (supposedly) dislike,
seven of them stand out because of their explicit remarks on the issue of dis-
tinction. Two central aspects serve as the axis of this articulation: first, the clear
divide between the metropolitan centre (Bogotá), where the authors live and
operate, and the periphery, the coastal regions of which Cartagena, where the
pageant takes place, is the pinnacle.20 Second, the question of ‘narco-culture’
(Rincón 2009), a term coined by the Colombian media and cultural elites
during the peak of drug-trafficking in the eighties ‘to describe the cultural
practices of the lower-class/newly rich drug lords’ (Rojas-Sotelo 2014) which
aimed at re-configuring power through consumption in an attempt to
make room for themselves in old structures of power. A close-reading of
one of theses columns, by Felipe Zuleta Lleras, journalist at El Espectador,
will suffice to make my point.
Zuleta (Lleras) posits the president of the pageant, Raimundo Angulo (a
costeño from the local Cartagenian elite), as the main reason for abolishing the
Miss Colombia in a text that is, from beginning to end, a battering of Angulo.
The first paragraph introduces the target of his derision as someone who
will never go unnoticed because he has the appearance of a run-down cachaco
[someone from Bogotá] that disguises himself with a bogus dinner jacket – similar
to those Dominican Republic dictator, Rafael Leonidas Trujillo, used to wear – so
that when seeing him, it is difficult to decide whether one is in front of a waiter
from Girardot or a trumpet player from the Lucho Bermúdez’s orchestra. Or, as in
multiple selection tests, all of the above (Zuleta Lleras 2006, p. 105).21

Focusing on Angulo’s dress, this opening sets the tone of the whole text
which Zuleta – who not only comes from Bogotá but is a member of the
Lleras family, one of the Colombian so called (creole) ‘presidential dynasties’ –
uses entirely to denigrate Angulo by pointing out the countless forms in
which the latter (but also the misses) fails to convince him that he is ‘gente de
bien’.22 In one single paragraph – which opens with a line that characterises
20 I. GIRALDO

Angulo (a costeño) as a downgraded version of a cachaco – Zuleta synthesises

the tension with regard to class and distinction between the metropolitan
centre and the periphery: that true distinction only belongs to the ‘proper’ bour-
geoisie which is the one that comes from Bogotá. The corollary is that the most
someone from the periphery – even if they belong to the local elites, like Angulo
– can aim at is to perform class and that such a performance is necessarily
doomed to fail. That Angulo performs and fails is made clear by Zuleta’s use
of the term ‘to disguise’ (‘disfrazarse’) in lieu of ‘to dress’ (‘vestirse’). The hint at
his unintended imitation of Trujillo (a man reputed for being extravagant in
excess). The comparison with, first, a ‘waiter’ (‘mesero’) from an unsophisticated
place in Girardot, a rural minor town in Cundinamarca which is not only periph-
eral in relation to Bogotá but to Cartagena itself; second, a trumpet player from
an orchestra (the Lucho Bermúdez’s) which although famous, plays folk music.
Worse: an orchestra of cumbia and porro, both Caribbean folk rhythms from
African and indigenous origin thus, the very antithesis of distinction.
The opening paragraph makes use of similes and metaphorical associ-
ations to make clear the extent to which Angulo is not what he wants and pre-
tends to be. The body mostly focuses on the Misses’ typical hypercorrection, a
wide-spread socio-linguistic phenomenon that derives from the country’s
highly-hierarchised social organisation and the unqualified dominance of
the lettered city but which Zuleta decides to blame on Angulo’s personal
training of the Misses. The closing paragraph, in turn, is much more explicit
in its making the point Zuleta set himself up to make: that he is looking
forward to the moment when the Miss Colombia is no longer organised
‘con lobería de etiqueta calentana’ (i.e. with the bad taste inherent to the eti-
quette from hotter regions) and watched over by ‘a pretentious fine man
de tierra caliente’ (Zuleta Lleras 2006, p. 105).
Though Zuleta is not providing guidance about how to be (one of the func-
tions of the lifestyle magazine), he is definitely imparting judgement about how
not to be. As someone located for historical reasons on the ‘point zero’ – a white
man of creole lineage, born, raised, and located in Bogotá – he is granting
himself the right of representing the other, whom despite also being a man
and also coming from the higher tiers of society, he reads (and from the
other articles in the section one gets he is not the only one to do so) as
having failed in his deployment of the whiteness device.
A second example is worth close-reading because it works as a mirror of
Zuleta’s with regard to social class while showing one crucial point made
by black feminist theorists: the importance of looking at social categories
intersectionally (see Lorde 2007). If Zuleta’s is a text in which an upper-class
man shames another one on the basis of the author’s perceived failed deploy-
ment of the whiteness device by the object of his scorn, the second example is
a 1,036 words long text entirely dedicated to the lambasting of an imagined
lower-class man by an upper-class woman. Titled ‘El derecho a ser lobo (Una
 CULTURAL STUDIES 21

defensa con mucha garra)’ and written by Isabella Santodomingo – actress

and socialite – the text is an ironic defence of ‘the right to be tacky’, which
is the rough translation of the original title. This text is an illustrative
example of how in contemporary postmodern culture, which disingenuously
assumes social categories are no longer operative, irony is frequently used as a
tool for shaming others because it allows for the agent of the ironic shaming
to have it both ways: ‘expressing unpalatable sentiments in an ironized form,
while claiming this was not actually meant’ (Gill 2007, p. 159).
In self-referential mode Santodomingo opens by observing that ‘although
it might strike some as an utter non-sense, it fell precisely upon her rather
than upon, say, Laisa Reyes, to be in charge of leading the defence of what
in popular [Colombian] parlance is known as lobo’ (Santodomingo 2007).23
Though originally a noun, the term lobo or loba (‘wolf’) in Colombian
Spanish is also used as an adjective (or an abjectivised noun) implying tacki-
ness, vulgarity, cheapness and which encompasses both working-class and
‘narco-culture’ aesthetics. Starting her ‘defence’ by admitting that she once
dated a lobo, the text is an endless succession of class-inflected insults –
lobo, ñero, guiso, boleta, brocha – and exaggerated clichés (so extreme it is
obvious she is making the story up) about lower classes tastes and lifestyles
which evince the profoundly stratified structure of Colombian society.
The text is roughly organised in three sections. In the first section Santodo-
mingo explains the context and makes clear that although she dated a certain
‘Ferney’, a heavily class-inflected name, they actually ‘NEVER left her flat’
except for once when she took him to a Halloween party and forced him to
wear a Fox’s mask (‘because it was better to be seen dating a fake fox than
a real lobo’ (Santodomingo 2007, p. 106). She ‘dated’ him because he was a
really good sexual partner which made up for: a ‘golden tooth’, an allusion
to his misreading and misusing of signs of distinction. His wearing of ‘a
pendant of the Deportivo Cúcuta’, a very marginal team of the already
quite low-quality Colombian league. His beloved ‘Bersachy jeans’, an allusion
to how the intersection of lack of economic capital and cultural capital trans-
lates into the acquisition of conspicuously ersatz goods (Santodomingo 2007,
p. 106).
The second section lists the supposed advantages of dating lobos (Santo-
domingo 2007, p. 108). This is done by means of pretended humorous com-
ments that lambaste what she identifies as terrible bad taste and a lack of
worldly knowledge in a mode of narration that intends for the contrast
with her own tastes and lifestyle to appear as stark. These ‘advantages’ all
point to how by dating a lower-class man, the upper-class woman might
increase her power over him: allusions to bad taste and fashion ignorance,
which translates into being able to constantly impress him (‘whatever she
decides to wear, even when it comes to a foul piece of clothing, the lobo
will be dazzled because he will think the piece in question is the most
22 I. GIRALDO

recent fashionable item’). Stratified labour at the heart of unequal social struc-
tures, which translates into a basic aspect of social power (‘entrance to discos
will always be free because the lobo always knows somebody who works in
that kind of place’). Utter lack of gastronomic knowledge, which translates
into being taken for a great cook and into reducing the house’s food
budget (‘the lobo takes tuna cans for fresh salmon’ and ‘is incapable of dis-
tinguishing beef fillet from beef neck, red wine from raisin juice, and a kiwi
from a sapote’ (Santodomingo 2007, p. 108)). The final section aims at con-
cluding with somewhat contradictory comments on how she sees the
relationship between economic and cultural capital (without using those
terms) and closes with an intertextual reference to a book she wrote titled
Gentlemen prefer them stupid which was made into a very successful TV
series in 2010: ‘Now that I think of it, I will title my next book Ladies prefer
them lobos’.
While the text is aimed at savaging an imaginary lower-class man, the pic-
tures that accompany it shame lower-class women. They show Santodomingo
in a heavily class-inflected attire: a black dress with a deep cleavage, open at
the back and shorter in the front of her legs, a very thick plastic-looking belt
crowned with an oversized buckle, and what appears to be a diamond on her
tooth added with Photoshop. Both text and pictures can be read as a chain of
meta-performances of gender and class: she is an upper-class woman that is
performing her upper-classness by means of performing lower-classness on a
imaginary man (represented in words) and an imaginary woman (represented
in pictures).
Santodomingo’s own performance of class and distinction also seems to
spill over SoHo as the theatre of such performances and into real life. Indeed,
she is a very marginal member of the Santo Domingo family, one of the
richest and most powerful in Colombia. Yet, unlike some of the core
members of that family, who not only appear in the Forbes list because of
their enormous wealth but who now make part of the British and Monegas-
que royal families (Hola.com 2016), her fame and social positioning is far less
impressive and confined to Colombia. Thus, unlike her second cousin, Tatiana
Casiraghi (née Santo Domingo), which changed her last name because she
married Andreas Casiraghi, fourth in the line of succession to the Monegas-
que throne, Isabella recurred to a more artificial method of deploying the
whiteness device: officially changing her original first name, Miriam Isabel,
both Colombian and unfashionable, for the Italian version of the second
item (see Jordan 2018). Santodomingo’s meta-performances of class both
in the text and in real-life are instances of that form of difference that is
mimicry – almost the same but not quite (Bhabha 1994, p. 127): she is
almost a real Santo Domingo (although she spells her name without the
space) yet not quite and she takes issue with those who aspire to sophisti-
cation (which is certainly not-Colombian by default, therefore the
 CULTURAL STUDIES 23

importance of replacing Isabel for Isabella) but hopelessly fail because they
are too truly Colombian, that is, lobos in excess.
It might be important to address whether engaging with a text written by a
woman complicates my argument about the inherent maleness of the ‘let-
tered city’ and SoHo’s gender ideology which, I claim, equates femaleness
with nature, and maleness with intellect. This inherent maleness does not pre-
clude women from positioning themselves within it, in the same way that the
‘whiteness device’ can be deployed by subjects who are non-white. Indeed,
and as mentioned above, SoHo featured female writers though some
caveats were in order (see p. 10). This granted the magazine some
benefits:24 first, it pre-empted feminist critiques on that respect. Second, it
endowed the magazine with the patina of contemporary worldliness and
postmodern style that was always actively pursued. This is crucial because
SoHo has always been enmeshed in postmodernism and neoliberalism,
whose politics of inclusion and diversification commodify difference (trans-
forming it into lifestyles) while actively hindering the dismantlement of the
structures of power. Third, it helped reinforcing the ‘postfeminist regime’
(Giraldo 2016 2020a) the magazine was in the business of establishing
(Giraldo Forthcoming a). The postfeminist regime, in turn, constituted the
crucial point around which SoHo articulated its teleological aim of bringing
about a cultural transformation that maintained the social hierarchies
unchanged (for a fuller development of this last point, see Giraldo 2020b;
Giraldo Work in progress).
More importantly, the women writing for SoHo were controlled in ways
the men were not. If they were to fall out of line, the backlash was ruthless.
In 2012, for instance, one of the women that contributed in a number of
occasions to SoHo, Alejandra Azcárate, published in Aló a pretended humor-
ous diatribe – badly written and concatenating insult after insult in a poorly
performed pseudo-ironic tone – against fat women (Azcárate 2012). While
she deserved the wide backlash she received, the event provided an oppor-
tunity for certain male core members of the lettered city to put her in her
place. Thus, Ricardo Silva Romero wrote a column for El Tiempo explicitly
likening Azcárate’s ‘lack of literary talent’ with that of Isabella Santodomin-
go’s.25 In it he asserted that although he had not read Azcárate until then,
he already knew she used to deploy (in her shows) ‘the very demanding
approach of political incorrectness without having the competence to do
so’ (Silva Romero 2012). Though Azcárate’s defence included explicitly com-
paring herself to Daniel Samper Ospina (in his Revista Semana weekly
column), Silva Romero was quite clear he thought she had a nerve for
doing so (Silva Romero 2012).
Another example is provided by María Jimena Duzán, a reputed female jour-
nalist, colleague of Daniel Samper Ospina at Revista Semana, and who contrib-
uted on a number of occasions to SoHo during the period of study. In 2011
24 I. GIRALDO

Duzán dared writing a column for Semana where she criticised some young
female radio journalists who agreed to be featured in SoHo’s edition 136
(Duzán 2011) and Samper Ospina responded (in his respective column in
Semana) by personally savaging her (Samper Ospina 2011). Elsewhere
(Giraldo 2020b) I show that his response was, from beginning to end, a
vicious attack against Duzán structured around four features he assigned to
her: prudery, hypocrisy, pomposity, and sexual non-desirability. This last
point, he suggests, would entail from her being ‘ugly’, a term never mentioned,
yet, ostensibly present, and from a supposedly outdated aesthetic sense, which
he implies would derive from her being rather oldish (Giraldo 2020b).26 Hence,
although the borders of ‘the lettered city’ might appear as fluid, they are rather
rigid for those who do not truly belong. Any attempt (by the non-core
members) to challenge the rules of the game, will be punished.
Zuleta’s and Santodomingo’s texts can be read as their respective authors
strategies of cultural distancing. In Bourdieu’s terms, they highlight those
‘symbolic manifestations whose sense of worth depend both on those who
perceive it and those who produce it’ and constitute therefore ‘privileged
signs of social class at the same time that they become the tool par excellence
of strategies of distinction’ (Bourdieu 1979, p. 70). They also emphasise the
ideology of ‘natural taste’, which grants two things to those who are supposed
to have it: first, a self-assurance that translates into the certitude of having cul-
tural legitimacy, and second, the ease associated with excellence and which
derives its effectiveness from its capacity to transform the differences in the
acquisition of culture into differences of essence (Bourdieu 1979, p. 70–71).
They further constitute examples of the colonial continuities in postcolonial
times by showing how the ‘whiteness device’ and ‘the lettered city’ are still
fully operative in the contemporary Colombian context. This highlights that
what is at stake in these strategies of cultural and social distancing is the
keeping of the structure of social inequality unaltered because equality
reduces the social distance that is necessary for distinction to be operative.
In other words: they exemplify the cultural strategies deployed by the
upper-classes aimed at keeping the higher social-ground.

8. Conclusion
This article aimed to make some contributions. Firstly, it aimed at recentring and
showing the relevance and theoretical potential of the concepts of ‘the lettered
city’ and the ‘whiteness device’ for explaining the continuities between colonial
New Granada and postcolonial Colombia. While the lettered city is a concept
mostly operative in Colombia and Latin America, the whiteness device has
the potential to be applied beyond. Secondly, it aimed at providing the first
analysis of a media product of great contextual importance and thus contribute
to the study of consumer culture in Colombia at the turn of the century. Thirdly,
 CULTURAL STUDIES 25

and in contrast to dominant approaches to media and cultural studies in Latin

America at large, it intended to carry out a discursive analysis of a media
product that posited ideology (in Stuart Hall’s terms), the question of power
(from a foucaultian perspective), and hegemonic culture at the centre stage.
I constructed my argument on the basis of a number of interconnected
claims (supported by the respective analyses) of what SoHo has been and
has done in contemporary Colombia. These claims are: first, that it operated
during the Samper Ospina years as a ‘virtual theatre’ – a theatrical scene
mediated through a magazine – where performances of gender, class, and
race took place. These performances are partly theatrical – thus take place
through the deployment of the ‘lettered city’ and the ‘whiteness device’ –
and partly linguistic – they put in effect the performativity of language
(Austin’s theory of speech acts), and second, that SoHo has been a mise en
abyme of how the ‘lettered city’ (Rama 1996), which implicitly encompasses
the ‘whiteness device’ (Castro-Gómez 2010), is a powerful tool to enact dis-
tinction in the highly stratified Colombian society. Third, that the magazine
has explicitly aimed at ‘educating’ men and women in postmodern sensibil-
ities in order to carry out a social transformation that, paradoxically, also
aims at keeping social hierarchies (of gender, race, social class, sexuality,
etc.) unchanged. In short, that SoHo is an example of what Foucault
denotes as ‘a synaptic regime of power’, that is, one in which power is exer-
cised ‘within the social body, rather than from above it’ (Foucault 1980, p. 39).

Notes
1. After Samper Ospina’s stepping down as head of SoHo, Diego Garzón, who had
been general editor since Edition 78 (Oct. 2006), took up his position. The maga-
zine is still being published on a monthly basis in Colombia and in the other
countries where it was independently established under Samper Ospina.
2. As I show elsewhere (Giraldo Forthcoming a), a number of facts attest to the
claim that SoHo was successful in converting consumers into value. Most
notable of all is the fact that women that were already established as celebrities
kept agreeing to being featured in it for free while non-celebrities went to great
lengths in order to achieve this.
3. As an adjective, ‘virtual’ has been entirely absorbed by computer science and in
that context, it refers to technological mediation that allows/encourages
viewers’ participation from the part of the viewer. Working from within this
approach Giannachi defines ‘virtual theatres’ as ‘open works in which the
viewer is variously participating to the work of art from within it’ (Giannachi
2004, p. 4). I am reclaiming a more mundane use of the term ‘virtual’ that
puts the emphasis on the process of mediation, even ‘remediation’ (Giannachi
2004, 4 cited in: Bolter and Grusin 2000), while removing the technological
aspect.
4. NOTE ON THE CORPUS. This article is part of a larger project on SoHo – comprising
four to five more articles and a book chapter – whose larger argument is that at
the turn of the century, SoHo operated as a powerful tool in the establishing of
26 I. GIRALDO

postfeminist female subjectivities and in the regulation of femininity in urban

Colombia. In those pieces, I explore various texts and media events different
to the ones studied here. The totality of the corpus for the period I am interested
in is extremely large: around 150 editions amounting to more than 23 thousand
pages (including articles, features, cartoons, profiles, chronicles, pictures, ads,
etc.) for the fourteen years that Samper Ospina spent as head of the magazine.
Yet, a qualitative analysis demands for close-reading which means that the
number of pieces to be closely examined is necessarily low. Part of the analysis
here remains at a general level and can be confirmed by just browsing any
edition chosen randomly. The selection of the pieces for close-reading was
made also almost randomly because examples that support my argument
abound in the magazine. I proceeded by fixing one variable: the author of the
piece to be examined. I chose two of the best established Colombian male
writers who contributed to the magazine on a frequent basis (Héctor Abad
Faciolince and Santiago Gamboa), one reputed journalist who contributed to
it in several occasions (Felipe Zuleta Lleras), and a female actress and socialite
turned writer (Isabella Santodomingo), who wrote a book upon which a very
successful 2010 TV show (that could in fact be analysed in conjunction with
SoHo because it mobilises the same kind of gender ideology) was based. I
could have, however, chosen different authors: Alberto Aguirre (2004), Ricardo
Silva Romero (2005), Antonio García (2007), etc. A different journalist: Daniel Cor-
onell (2006), Gustavo Gómez (2010), Fernando Garavito (2004), etc. Or a different
female writer: Margarita Posada (2009), Alejandra Azcárate (2014), Margarita
Rosa de Francisco (2013a), etc. I could have also chosen different pieces by
the same authors and/or media events rather than texts. In any of these
cases, the core of the argument would have remained unchanged because
the amount of available evidence supporting it is overwhelming.
5. While revising this article for resubmission, Boris Johnson was elected as Britain’s
Prime Minister in a land-slide. Those knowing what this means for the most disem-
powered layers of society and the new generations (though not for only them),
have started reflecting on how him and the Tories could have got away with every-
thing they have done since 2010 (including the 2019 campaign). Some of these
people went canvassing during the last week of the campaign and someone
who did this, and whose Labour constituency fell to the Tories, wrote about it.
His reflections are a potent echo of my argument about the importance of recen-
tring ideology and hegemonic culture in the current political climate: ‘The first
and in my view the most disturbing issue that door knocking immediately raises
is that of media influence [ … ] A huge amount of people regurgitated, verbatim,
media attack lines about Labour and Corbyn’. The author also voices his concern,
which I fully share, that the tendency in current cultural studies to emphasise
‘human agency vis a vis the media, have obscured the extent to which the media
influences people’ and that in his view, ‘door knocking hits home the enduring
strength of the propaganda model’ (Evans-Kanu 2019).
6. Emphasis in the original.
7. See Trentmann and Otero-Cleves (2017) for a recent article on the history of con-
sumption in Latin America.
8. For my use of ‘modernity-coloniality’ instead of the original ‘modernity/colonial-
ity’ (Mignolo 2000; Quijano 2000) within decolonial approaches see Giraldo
(2016).
 CULTURAL STUDIES 27

9. The juridical system was organised so that ethnic inequalities did not derive
from subjective appreciations but were registered in the law, which situated
individuals in its corresponding ethnic category through the issuing of certifi-
cates that guaranteed direct descendance from the first settlers (Castro-
Gómez 2010, p. 73). The Universidad Tomística in Bogotá, for instance, included
in the diploma issued to its graduates the statement Purus ab omnia macula san-
guinis certifying the holder’s blood was pure, i.e. 100% creole and hence untarn-
ished by mestizaje (see Castro-Gómez 2010, p. 66–67).
10. Emphasis in the original in Spanish.
11. The ‘whiteness device’ is connected with the principle of the ‘purity of blood’
which was implemented in 16th century Spain in order to establish the distinction
between Christians and convert Jews or Moors (Castro-Gómez 2014, p. 82–83).
12. The study of masculinity was on the rise during the eighties while the production
of new masculine subjects, such as the ‘new father’, the ‘new man’, the ‘new lad’,
saw an explosion at the turn of the century in mainstream academia (see Gill
2003). Contributing to the wider debate on masculinity and masculine subjects
lays outside of the scope of this article. However, I admit that it would be interest-
ing to explore how the various masculine subjects I claim are constructed and
mobilised in SoHo – the traditional letrado, the metrosexual, the new lad – articu-
late within a broader cultural analyses that take into consideration the question of
hybridity and the never ending modern-postmodern debate in Latin America.
13. Son of Daniel Samper Pizano (one of the most reputed 20th century Colombian
journalists), nephew of Ernesto Samper Pizano (president for the 1994-1998
period), great-grand son of Daniel Samper Ortega (director of the National
Library between 1931 and 1938 and behind the national programme of cultural
dissemination implemented during the 20th-century Liberal Republic), Daniel
Samper Ospina has managed to position himself as one of the most powerful
figures dominating public opinion in contemporary Colombia (La Silla Vacía
2013). He achieved this partly through his family connections and through his
work during the SoHo years and has maintained it through his work in Revista
Semana (up to April 2020), his very active Twitter account (2,7 million followers),
and through his YouTube channel (more than 700K subscribers).
14. For Foucault, the ‘universal intellectual’, a figure he dates back to the eighteenth
century, ‘derives from the jurist or notable, and finds his fullest manifestation in
the writer, the bearer of values and significations in which all can recognise
themselves’ (Foucault 1980, p. 128).
15. Edition 173, the SoHo’s fifteenth anniversary edition, features a full size picture of
a nude Daniel Samper Ospina covering his crotch with both hands and looking
shy, displeased, and almost terrified (SoHo 2014). He is far from embodying the
metrosexual model of masculinity and is very proud of his being bald, ‘old’ (b.
1974), unfit, etc. In fact, this is one of his usual self-deprecation lines in his
column in Revista Semana, his YouTube channel, and his Twitter account. See
Giraldo (Forthcoming a) for an analysis of Edition 173 and of the ‘media
event’ that constituted its production in urban Colombia.
16. Emphasis mine.
17. Racial statistics for Colombia show that Afro-Colombians are mainly located in
the coastal departments. Moreover, all but one coastal counties have an Afro-
Colombian population density of at least 10%, going up to 82% for Choco,
57% for San Andres, around 27% for both Bolivar and Valle del Cauca, etc. (Her-
nández Romero 2010, p. 30).
28 I. GIRALDO

18. Emphasis mine.

19. Translation taken from an online source (Paz 1957).
20. This geographical hierarchical divide has always been in operation with national
elites located in Bogotá, and local coastal elites occupying a subordinated position.
21. Emphasis mine.
22. The expression ‘gente de bien’, best translated as ‘people of quality’, refers to the
old bourgeoisie and the intersection of cultural and economic capital.
23. Laisa Reyes is a fictional character from a popular telenovela (‘Los Reyes’) aired the
year of publication of the column who comes from a lower class family that sud-
denly becomes very rich.
24. The female writers benefited too. It is widely acknowledged that, during the
Samper Ospina years, SoHo became the platform for writers to make themselves
known to the wider public and to those within structures of power.
25. Despite the inherent elitism in the notion of ‘literary talent’, it is true that both
Santodomingo and Azcárate have limited writing skills, even from a perspective
that only considers grammar. Also that the claim that their looks have been
pivotal in their becoming celebrities and in allowing for their locating them-
selves at the borders of the ‘lettered city’ is founded (for a translation of Azcá-
rate’s infamous column, see Giraldo 2013). One could also argue that
Santodomingo’s Los caballeros las prefieren brutas was made into a TV series
and became a success not because of the quality of the text but because it
was a rabid antifeminist pamphlet that relied heavily on postfeminist discourse
and ostensibly aimed at perpetuating patriarchy. The case of Margarita Rosa de
Francisco is also worth mentioning because it was her European looks which
opened her many doors. She started as a beauty queen, to become a singer,
then an actress, then a TV presenter, and is now a writer. She has a regular
column in El Espectador, one of the two national newspapers, and in early
2018 she wrote a text full of gibberish (de Francisco 2018a). The outpouring
of angry reactions from many readers was harsh. They called into question
that someone without the training and/or talent was given a blank slate by
one of the two national newspapers to write such a column while many other
people, with the talent and the training, were rarely given any opportunity.
She responded bitterly a week later to relinquish her space at El Espectador
(de Francisco 2018b), but in the end she kept it. All this points to what I argue
in detail in Beauty, citizenship, and sex: 21st-century fantasies of the Colombian
nation in relation to embodiment, beauty, and citizenship in neoliberal Colombia
(see Giraldo Forthcoming a).
26. This media event, as I show in the article where I engage with it, constitutes yet
another example of the ways in which SoHo, under Samper Ospina, aimed at a
cultural transformation that maintained a very unequal social hierarchy along
several axes (see Giraldo 2020b).

Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes on contributor
Isis Giraldo holds a PhD from the University of Lausanne (2017, honours). Her work
belongs within the fields of cultural and media studies from critical approaches that
 CULTURAL STUDIES 29

recentre power and social justice. Empirically, it mostly focuses on Colombia and aims
at showing how cultural hegemony has helped maintain stark imbalances of power
along the axes of gender, race, and social class, and justify regimes of rule by a privi-
leged few. Theoretically, it aims at connecting Northern feminist theories and postco-
lonial studies with critical thought on gender, race, and coloniality as developed from
within Latin America. Giraldo’s work has been published in journals such as Feminist
Media Studies, Feminist Theory, and Debate Feminista.

ORCID
Isis Giraldo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-7175

References
Abad Faciolince, H., 2007. Mi trauma con el baile. SoHo, 92, 296–297.
Aguirre, A., 2004. El placer de no ir al campo. SoHo, 52. Available from: https://www.
soho.co/historias/articulo/el-placer-no-ir-campo/2949 [Visited on 21 April 202].
Ahmed, S., 2004. Affective economies. Social text, 22 (2), 117–139.
Armstrong, N., and Tennenhouse, L., 1987. The literature of conduct, the conduct of lit-
erature, and the politics of desire: an introduction. In: The ideology of conduct: essays
on literature and the history of sexuality. New York and London: Methuen.
Ayala Osorio, G., 2006. Hechos noticiosos, tratamientos explosivos. Cali: Universidad
Autónoma de Occidente.
Azcárate, A., Jul 2012. Las siete ventajas de la gordura. Revista Aló. Available from: http://
www.caracol.com.co/noticias/actualidad/columna-de-alejandra-azca rate-sobre-las-
7-ventajas-de-la-gordura/20120706/nota/1718163.aspx [Accessed 15 Mar 2015].
Azcárate, A., 2014. Los siete niveles de cantaleta que tienen las mujeres. SoHo, 166, 82–
83.
Bell, D., and Hollows, J., 2006. Towards a history of lifestyle. In: D. Bell and J. Hollows,
eds. Historicizing lifestyle: mediating taste, consumption and identity from the 1900s
to 1970s. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Benwell, B., 2003. Ambiguous masculinities: heroism and anti-heroism in the men’s life-
style magazine. The sociological review, 51, 151–168.
Bhabha, H., 1994. The location of culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Bolter, J.D., and Grusin, R., 2000. Remediation: understanding new media. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Bonilla, J.I., 2002. Periodismo, guerra y paz. Campo intelectual periodístico y agendas
de la información en Colombia. Signo y Pensamiento, 21 (40), 53–71.
Bonilla, J.I., and Tamayo Gómez, C.A., 2007. Violencias y medios de comunicación
en América Latina: una cartografía para el análisis. Signo y pensamiento, 25 (50),
211–231.
Bourdieu, P., 1979. La distinction. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Bushnell, D., 1993. The making of modern Colombia: a nation in spite of itself. Berkeley -
Los Angeles - London: University of California Press.
Castro-Gómez, S., 2010. La hybris del punto cero. Ciencia, raza e ilustración en la Nueva
Granada (1750–1816). Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Castro-Gómez, S., 2014. Cuerpos racializados. Para una genealogía de la colonialidad
del poder en Colombia. In: H. Cardona Rodas and Z. Pedraza Gómez, eds. Al otro
lado del cuerpo. estudios biopolíticos en américa latina. Ediciones Uniandes, 79–95.
30 I. GIRALDO

Chasteen, J.C., 1996. Introduction. In: J.C. Chasteen ed. Angel Rama’s the lettered city.
Durham and London: Duke University Press, vii-xiv.
Cieply, S.K., 2010. The uncommon man: esquire and the problem of the North American
male consumer, 1957–1963. Gender & history, 22 (1), 151–168.
Coad, D., 2016. Metrosexual. In The wiley blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality
studies. Wiley Online Library, 1–2.
Connell, R., 2005. Masculinities, 2nd ed. Berkeley – Los Angeles: Polity.
Coronell, D., 2006. La velada de coronación. SoHo, 79, 114–115.
de Francisco, M.R., 2013a. El infernal privilegio de ser bonita. SoHo, 164, 176–177.
de Francisco, M.R., 2013b. Mi anécdota porno (Primera parte). SoHo, 154, 22.
de Francisco, M.R., 2013c. Mi anécdota porno (Segunda parte). SoHo, 155, 42.
de Francisco, M.R., Jan 17 2018a. Falsa alarma. El Espectador. Available from: https://
www.eltiempo.com/opinion/columnistas/margarita-ro sa-de-francisco/falsa-alarma-
172274 [Visited on 14 Dec 2019].
de Francisco, M.R., Feb 1 2018b. Intelectuales. El Espectador. Available from: https://
www.eltiempo.com/opinion/columnistas/margarita-ro sa-de-francisco/
intelectuales-de-mujeres-y-demonios-177508 [Visited on 14 Dec 2019].
Duzán, M.J., Aug 27 2011. Sin tetas sí hay periodismo. Available from: http://www.
semana.com/opinion/articulo/sin-tetas-si-perio dismo/245526-3 [Visited on 5 Aug
2019].
Edwards, J., 2008. Postcolonial literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elias, N., 1994. The civilizing process: the history of manners and state formation and civi-
lization. Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell.
Evans-Kanu, D., 2019. Reflections from the doorstep. Medium. Available from: https://
medium.com/@DrDanEvans/reflections-from-the-doors tep-e4337513d909 [Visited
on 13 Dec 2019].
Featherstone, M., 2007. Consumer culture and postmodernism. Sage.
Foucault, M., 1980. In: C. Gordon, ed. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other
writings 1972–1977. New York: Vintage Books.
Gamboa, S., Mar 2005. Martina García. SoHo, 61, 124–131.
Garavito, F., 2004. El placer de no ir a reuniones de ex alumnos. SoHo, 52, 98.
García, A., 2007. Squash con Ricardo. SoHo, 92, 84.
García Canclini, N., 1995. Consumidores y ciudadanos. conflictos multiculturales de la
globalización. Debolsillo.
García Canclini, N., 2009. El diálogo norte-sur en los estudios culturales. Introducción a
la edición en inglés. In: Consumidores y ciudadanos. conflictos multiculturales de la
globalización. Debolsillo, 13–28.
Giannachi, G., 2004. Virtual theatres: an introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
Gill, R., 2003. Power and the production of subjects: a genealogy of the new man and
the new lad. In: B. Benwell, ed. Masculinity and men’s lifestyle magazines. Bethan
Benwell: Blackwell Publishing.
Gill, R., 2007. Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility. European journal of
cultural studies, 10 (2), 147–166.
Giraldo, I., Dec 2013. Seven advantages of being fat: translation. Personal blog. Available
from: http://viragos.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/translation/.
Giraldo, I., 2016. Coloniality at work: decolonial critique and the postfeminist regime.
Feminist theory, 17 (2), 157–173.
Giraldo, I., Dec 2017. The ‘Gender Ideology’ menace and the rejection of the peace agree-
ment in Colombia. Discover Society. Available from: https://discoversociety.org/2017/
 CULTURAL STUDIES 31

12/06/the-gender-ideology-menace-and-the-rejection-of-the-peace-agreement-in-
colombia/.
Giraldo, I., 2020a. Posfeminismo / Genealogía, geografía y contornos de un concepto.
Debate Feminista, 59, 1–30.
Giraldo, I., 2020b. Redomestication et discipline des femmes: clefs postféministes dans
le magazine colombien SoHo. TrOPICS. To appear.
Giraldo, I., Forthcoming a. Beauty, citizenship, and sex: 21st-century fantasies of the
Colombian nation. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Giraldo, I., Forthcoming b. “Pedagogies of cruelty”, masculinity, and the patriarchal order
of the Colombian nation-state: the “Falsos Positivos” as a paradigmatic example.
Postcolonial Studies.
Giraldo, I., Work in progress. La revista SoHo en la Colombia urbana del siglo XXI.
Biopolítica y el continuo urbanidad — estilo de vida.
Gómez, G., 2010. Cosas muy lobas que hacemos los colombianos. SoHo, 119, 162.
Guerrero, L., 2013. Reivindicación del misionero. SoHo, 154, 62–63.
Guerrero, M., 2014. ‘Piedra de sol, 1957’. Letras Libres. Available from: https://www.
letraslibres.com/mexico-espana/piedra-sol-1957 [Accessed 14 May 2019].
Hall, S., 2016 (1983). Ideology and Ideological Struggle. In: Cultural studies 1983. Durham
and London: Duke University Press.
Hernández Romero, A., 2010. La visibilización estadística de los grupos étnicos colombia-
nos. Documento DANE. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística
(DANE).
Hola.com, 2016. ¿quién es quién en la familia santo domingo? Available from: https://www.
hola.com/actualidad/2016050284803/famila-santo-domingo-quien/ [Accessed 20 Jun
2019].
Iqani, M., 2018. Consumer culture and the media. In: O. Kravets, et al., eds. The sage
handbook of consumer culture. London: Sage, 275-289, Chap. 16.
Jancovich, M., 2006. The politics of playboy: lifestyle, sexuality and non-conformity in
American cold war culture. In: D. Bell and J. Hollows, eds. Historicizing lifestyle: med-
iating taste, consumption and identity from the 1900s to the 1970s. Routledge.
Jet Set, Aug 12 2014. Daniel samper ospina el hombre de los desnudos y las letras [Visited
on 13 Jan 2017].
Jordan, C., 2018. >Conocía el nombre completo de estos 11 famosos colombianos? In:
Colombia me Gusta. Jan 15 [Accessed May 25 2019].
Kellner, D.M., and Durham, M.G., 2006. Adventures in media and cultural studies: intro-
ducing the keyworks. In: D.M. Kellner and M.G. Durham, eds. Media and cultural
studies keyworks, Revised ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, ix–xxxviii.
La Silla Vacía, 2013. Los súper poderosos de la opinión pública, Jul 13. Available from:
http://lasillavacia.com/historia/poderosos-opinion-45198 [Accessed 11 Jun 2015].
Lorde, A., 2007. Age, race, class, and sex: women redefining difference. In: Sister outsi-
der. Berkeley: Crossing Press.
Lugones, M., 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia,
22 (1), 186–209.
Martín Barbero, J., 1991. De los medios a las mediaciones: comunicación, cultura y
hegemonía. Barcelona: G. Gili.
Martín Barbero, J., 1992. Transformaciones del género: de la telenovela en Colombia a
la telenovela colombiana. In: J. Martín Barbero and S. Muñoz, eds. Televisión y melo-
drama. géneros y lecturas de la telenovela en Colombia. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo
Editores.
32 I. GIRALDO

Martín Barbero, J., 2002. Oficio de cartógrafo: Travesías latinoamericanas de la

comunicación en la cultura. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
McRobbie, A., 2005. The uses of cultural studies. London: Sage Publications.
McRobbie, A., 2009. The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change.
London: Sage.
Mignolo, W., 2000. Local histories/global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and
border thinking, Paperback reissue, with a new preface, 2012. Princeton University
Press.
Mignolo, W., 2008. The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. In:
M. Moraña, et al., eds. Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial
debate. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W., 2013. Preamble: the historical foundation of modernity/coloniality and the
emergence of decolonial thinking. In: S. Castro-Klaren, ed. A companion to latin
American literature and culture. Wiley-Blackwell.
Ngai, S., 2005. Uggly feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ochoa, L., 2004. Por qué detesto a las feministas y a los machistas. SoHo, 51. Available
from: https://www.soho.co/historias/articulo/lila-ochoa-directora-de-la-revista-fucsi
a-odia-a-machistas-y-feministas/7779 [Visited on 21 April 202].
Olave, G., 2014. Aproximaciones retóricas al conflicto armado colombiano: una revisión
bibliográfica. Forma y Función, 27 (1), 155–197.
Palacio, R., 2015. Top de las escritoras colombianas más bonitas. SoHo, 178, 60.
Paz, O., 1957. Sunstone. In: R. Soulard Jr. and K. Kramer, ed. Available from: https://
archive.org/stream/BM332004paz/BM33_2004_paz_djvu.txt [Accessed 10 Jun
2019].
Pertierra, A.C., and Salazar, J.F., 2020. Media cultures in Latin America: key concepts and
new debates. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Posada, M., 2009. Peleando en el barro. SoHo, 114, 106–110.
Quijano, A., 2000. Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. In: E. Lander,
ed. La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoa-
mericanas. Buenos Aires: Clacso, 201–246.
Rama, A., 1996. In: J.C. Chasteen, Ed. The lettered city. Durham and London: Duke
University Press.
Rincón, O., Jul 2009. Narco.estética y narco.cultura en Narco.lombia. Nueva Sociedad,
222, 147–163.
Rojas-Sotelo, M.L., 2014. Narcoaesthetics in Colombia, Mexico, and the United States:
Death Narco, Narco Nations, Border States, Narcochingadazo? Latin American per-
spectives, 41 (2), 215–231.
Ruiz-Navarro, C., 2009. Una mujer prueba seis condones. SoHo, 113, 38–40.
Samper Ospina, D., 2010. Maria Fernanda Valencia: “Vote por mí y me desnudo en la
próxima edición”. SoHo, 118, 3–9. B side.
Samper Ospina, D., Sept 9 2011. María jimena se destapa. Available from: http://www.
semana.com/opinion/articulo/maria-jimena-desta pa/245887-3 [Visited on 6 Sept
2019].
Santodomingo, I., 2007. El derecho a ser lobo (Una defensa con mucha garra). SoHo, 92,
106–109.
Silva, R., 2012. República liberal, intelectuales y cultura popular. Medellin: La Carreta
Histórica.
Silva Romero, R., 2005. Parábola del lobo. SoHo, 59, 114.
Silva Romero, R., Jul 7 2012. Golpe bajo al sentido del humor. Available from: http://www.
eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-12009723 [Visited on 8 Dec 2019].
 CULTURAL STUDIES 33

Silverstone, R., 1999. Why study the media? London: Sage Publications.
Slater, D., 1997. Consumer culture and modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
SoHo, 2008. Vida SoHo: Margarita Posada, la escritora sexy. SoHo, 103, 55.
SoHo, 2009. Vida SoHo: Margarita García Robayo, la escritora sexy. SoHo, 112, 17.
SoHo, 2010. 8220. SoHo, 120, 25.
SoHo, 2012. Símbolo: Margarita Rosa de Francisco. SoHo, 151, 224–245.
SoHo, 2013. Yo no olvido el año viejo. SoHo, 164, 94.
SoHo, 2014. Daniel Samper Ospina. SoHo, 173, 23.
Trentmann, F., and Otero-Cleves, A.M., Jul 2017. Presentation. Paths, deflections, and
connections: consumption and its contribution to Latin American history. Historia
Crítica, 65, 13–28.
Tyler, I., 2013. Revolting subjects: social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain.
London & New York: Zed Books.
Zuleta Lleras, F., Nov 2006. Raimundo Angulo. SoHo, 79, 105.
Zuluaga, J., and Martínez, M.P., Aug 2012. Mapping digital media: Colombia. A report by
the open society foundation.