Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Gamma Radiation On The Quality and Shelf Life of Refrigerated Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Fillets
Effect of Gamma Radiation On The Quality and Shelf Life of Refrigerated Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Fillets
1Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 31587-77871, Karaj, Iran; 2Animal and Nutritional Sciences,
West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6108, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6108, USA; 3Department of Environmental and Fishery Sciences,
University of Tehran, 31585-4314, Karaj, Iran; 4Department of Fishery, Azad University, Tehran North Campus, P.O. Box 19737-33583,
Tehran, Iran; 5Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, P.O. Box 14155-5983, Tehran, Iran; and 6Departamento de Quı́mica
Analı́tica, Nutrición y Bromatoloxı́a, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-27002 Lugo, Galiza, Spain
The shelf life and safety of refrigerated fish and fish bacteriocins (6)) have been developed for extending the
products are dictated by the presence of food spoilage and shelf life and hygienic quality of fish commodities. Re-
pathogenic microorganisms (38). Spoilage of refrigerated cently, as a result of advances in irradiation technology, use
fish results from microbial growth and/or activity, which of ionizing radiation has been practiced in fish industries
manifests itself as changes in the sensory characteristics (9, 41, 52). Gamma radiation at low doses is a cold process
(production of off-odor and off-taste, slime formation, pro- that has been accepted by several countries for extension
duction of gas, etc.) (19). of shelf life of marine and freshwater fishery products (25,
Fish and shellfish are also known to be carriers of sev- 55). According to the Joint Expert Committee of Food and
eral pathogenic microorganisms that are implicated in food- Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/Inter-
borne diseases (13). The presence of spoilage and patho- national Atomic Energy Agency (FAO/WHO/IAEA), irra-
genic microorganisms in seafood is a major concern for the diation of any food commodity up to an overall average
fish processing industry, the administration, and consumers. dose of 10 kGy presents no toxicological hazard. There has
Despite improved manufacturing facilities and implemen- been worldwide interest in using this technology for pres-
tation of effective process control procedures such as haz- ervation of various foods, including fishery products (25,
ard analysis and critical control points in the food indus- 56). In addition to the extension of shelf life, this treatment
tries, the number of foodborne illnesses has increased (54). also improves the hygienic quality and safety of the prod-
This risk factor has prompted food scientists worldwide to ucts (32). According to Mendes et al. (41) there is no con-
reassess their techniques of food safety assurance in order
troversy among the experts that food irradiation is an eco-
to preserve or extend the shelf life of various aquatic food
nomical and effective food preservation method that has
products (7).
been validated in at least 39 countries and approved for 49
Many methods, including low-temperature storage
different products. Although irradiation is an effective
(21), reduction of water activity (e.g., smoking (5) and salt-
means for extending the shelf life of fishery products (45),
ing (28)), chemical treatments (e.g., antioxidant treatment
(53)), and novel techniques such as high-pressure treatment indirect effects, including the acceleration of lipid oxida-
(8) and use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) metabolites (e.g., tion, hydrolysis, and vitamin destruction, still limit its ap-
plication in some food products (14, 46).
* Author for correspondence. Tel: ⫹1-304-906-6268; Fax: ⫹1-304-293- In addition to irradiation, vacuum packaging of fresh
2232; E-mail: Rtahergorabi@gmail.com. fish prior to irradiation was considered essential in order to
1420 MOINI ET AL. J. Food Prot., Vol. 72, No. 7
prevent or delay microbial activity and also chemical Microbiological analysis. At each storage interval, 10 g of
changes during postradiation refrigerated storage (9, 29). sample was aseptically removed and homogenized for 1 min with
Furthermore, several studies have shown that vacuum pack- 90 ml of prechilled (4 ⫾ 0.5⬚C) sterile peptone–physiological sa-
aging in combination with chemical preservatives such as line solution (0.1% neutral peptone–0.85% NaCl; Merck, Darm-
stadt, Germany) in sterile deionized water (pH 7.0 ⫾ 0.05) using
sodium acetate (37) will enhance the shelf life of fish during
a presterilized Stomacher Lab-Blender (Seward type 400, London,
storage. So, the main aim of the present study was to eval- UK) (42). Further decimal serial dilutions were prepared from this
uate the effect of low and medium doses of gamma radia- homogenate in the same chilled sterile diluent. Microbiological
tion (1, 3, and 5 kGy), combined with sodium acetate and data were expressed as log CFU per gram of fillet. All of the
vacuum packaging, on the preservation and shelf life of microbial analyses were performed in triplicate on three subsam-
aquacultured freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus my- ples of each of the replicates. All media were purchased from
kiss) fillets, using microbiological, chemical, and organo- Oxoid Inc. (London, UK).
leptic analyses during refrigerator storage. In this study, total viable count (TVC) and Pseudomonas
count were determined using plate count agar and Pseudomonas
MATERIALS AND METHODS Agar Base according to the methods of the American Public
Health Association (4) and Mead and Adams (40), respectively.
Preparation of the samples, irradiation, and storage con- H2S-producing organisms were enumerated on iron agar Lyngby
ditions. A total of 84 freshwater rainbow trout (11 to 12 months by a pour-plating method in anaerobic jars with disposable An-
showed a significant impact on TVC, as its value was lower the reduction of H2S-producing bacteria in freshwater and
(P ⬍ 0.05) than those of the control samples (Fig. 1A). marine fish (tilapia and Spanish mackerel) by irradiation at
Although it is widely accepted that the initial microbial load a dose of 1.5 kGy (2) and also of sea bream by irradiation
of freshwater fish varies depending on water conditions and at 1 and 3 kGy (9).
temperature, most available literature on different fresh- Enterobacteriaceae were also found to be part of the
water fish species (tilapia, striped bass, rainbow trout, silver spoilage microflora of rainbow trout in salted samples in
perch, and sea bream) reports bacterial counts of 102 to 107 refrigerated storage. This finding is consistent with results
CFU/g (12, 24). Initial total viable counts of the control reported for different fish species, including fresh Atlantic
samples were ca. 4.41 log CFU/g, whereas the respective salmon (3), sea bass (43), sea bream (9), and rainbow trout
counts in samples irradiated at 1, 3, and 5 kGy were 3.08, (10), which showed the presence of Enterobacteriaceae at
1.46, and ⱕ1 log CFU/g at day 1 of refrigerated storage. the end of the storage time of the product under refrigerated
The initial counts indicated an acceptable fish quality, con- condition. The initial count of Enterobacteriaceae was 1.22
sidering the proposed upper limit for aerobic plate counts log CFU/g (day 7), and it reached a maximum count of
of 5 ⫻ 105 CFU/g for fresh fish (26). Chouliara et al. (9) 3.29 log CFU/g for the control sample at the end of the
reported initial counts for control and irradiated (1 and 3 storage period. The maximum count reached 2.29 and 1.45
kGy) sea bream fillets salted with NaCl, vacuum packaged, log CFU/g at the end of storage for 1 and 3 kGy, respec-
In this research work, a shelf life of 4 weeks was ob- cia-López. 2002. Numbers and types of microorganisms in vacuum-
tained for aquacultured rainbow trout, dipped in sodium packed cold-smoked freshwater fish at the retail level. Food Micro-
biol. 77:161–168.
acetate, vacuum packaged, and irradiated at 1, 3, and 5 kGy 17. Goulas, A. E., and M. G. Kontominas. 2005. Effect of salting and
under refrigeration, in comparison to a shelf life of only 2 smoking method on the keeping quality of chub mackerel (Scomber
weeks for the nonirradiated vacuum-packaged and sodium japonicus): biochemical and sensory attributes. Food Chem. 93:511–
acetate–dipped rainbow trout. 520.
18. Gram, L., and P. Dalgaard. 2002. Fish spoilage bacteria—problems
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS and solutions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:262–266.
19. Gram, L., and H. Huss. 1996. Microbiological spoilage of fish and
The authors thank J. M. Regenstein from the Department of Food fish products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 33:589–595.
Science at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and Barbara A. Rasco from the 20. Gram, L., G. Trolle, and H. H. Huss. 1987. Detection of specific
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition at Washington State spoilage bacteria from fish stored at low (0⬚C) and high (20⬚C) tem-
University, Pullman, for their critical review of the manuscript. peratures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 4:65–72.
21. Himelbloom, B. H., C. Crapo, E. K. Brown, J. Babitt, and K. Re-
REFERENCES pond. 1994. Pink salmon (Onchorynchus gorbuscha) quality during
ice and chilled seawater storage. J. Food Qual. 17:197–210.
1. Ababouch, L. H., L. Souibri, K. Rhaliby, O. Ouahdi, M. Battal, and 22. Huis in’t Veld, J. H. J. 1996. Microbial and biochemical spoilage of
F. F. Busta. 1996. Quality changes in sardines (Sardina pilchardus) foods: an overview. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 33:1–18.
stored in ice and at ambient temperature. Food Microbiol. 13:123–
microbiology for rapid assessment of shelf-life and quality of pro- In M. S. Rahman (ed.), Handbook of food preservation. Marcel Dek-
cessed channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. J. Appl. Aquaculture 3: ker, New York.
353–362. 47. Rasmussen, S. K. J., T. Ross, J. Olley, and T. McMeekin. 2002. A
39. Martinsdottir, E. 2002. Quality management of stored fish, p. 173– process risk model for the shelf life of Atlantic salmon fillets. Int.
190. In A. H. Bremner (ed.), Safety and quality issues in fish pro- J. Food Microbiol. 73:47–60.
cessing. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. 48. Reineccius, G. 1990. Off-flavours in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci.
40. Mead, G. C., and B. W. Adams. 1977. A selective medium for the Nutr. 29:381–402.
49. Ruiz-Capillas, C., and A. Moral. 2005. Sensory and biochemical
rapid isolation of Pseudomonas associated with poultry meat spoil-
aspects of quality of whole bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) during
age. Br. J. Poultry Sci. 18:661–670.
bulk storage in controlled atmospheres. Food Chem. 89:347–354.
41. Mendes, R., H. Alve Silva, M. Leonor Nunes, and J. M. Abecassis
50. Sallam, K. I., and K. Samejima. 2004. Microbiological and chemical
Empis. 2005. Effect of low-dose irradiation and refrigeration on the quality of ground beef treated with sodium lactate and sodium chlo-
microflora, sensory characteristics and biogenic amines of Atlantic ride during refrigerated storage. Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol./LWT-Food
horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus). J. Eur. Food Res. Technol. Sci. Technol. 37:865–871.
221:329–335. 51. Santos, C. L. D., D. James, and P. Teutscher. 1981. Guidelines for
42. Nedohula, P. C., and D. Westhoff. 1997. Microbiological analysis of chilled fish storage experiments. FAO Fish technical paper no. 210.
striped bass grown in three aquaculture systems. Food Microbiol. Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome.
14:255–264. 52. Savvaidis, I. N., P. Skandamis, K. Riganakos, N. Panagiotakis, and
43. Papadopoulos, V., I. Chouliara, A. Badeka, I. N. Savvaidis, and M. M. G. Kontominas. 2002. Control of natural microbial flora and Lis-
G. Kontominas. 2003. Effect of gutting on microbiological, chemi- teria monocytogenes in vacuum-packaged trout at 4 and 10⬚C using