Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Annex 9 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Project Title:

____________Erase D’ Waste_____________________________________________________

Problem Statement:

As the population of Apalit High School increases, the amount of waste materials inevitably
increases as well. This, together with the students’ attitude towards proper waste disposal has led
to a major problem in waste disposal management.

Project Objective Statement:

To initiate and develop awareness of massive environmental actions for the zero-waste
management.

Root Cause:

Uncontrollable increase of waste materials

Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Activity Output Date of Person Budget Budget


Implementatio Responsible Source
n
OK Oplan Regular August 14, 2019 Class Adviser Provided by School
Kalinisan Clean-up Science school Funds
Drive with Teachers
Monitoring CAT
Board
Basura Ko, PBB – Plastic August 1, 2019 Students P25 Personal
Uwi Ko Bottle – April 2020 Science
Basurahan Teachers
Class Adviser
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING GUIDE

The Project Team shall agree on the role of its members (e.g. Project Team Leader, Assistant
Team Leader, Scribe, etc.). For documentation purposes, you may use the following template:

Norman C. Gonzales, Ed. D. Project Owner

Project Member Role Responsibilities


Sharisse A. Waje Team Leader
Alvin R. Ducut Facilitator
Lea L. Gatbonton Documentation
Laarni D. Doncillo ICT / Documentation
Gladys P. Rubio Communication
Jonathan G. Olegario Scribe
SPT TIMETABLE

Activities Schedule
Preparatory
Secure the CBMs from the LGU June 13, 2019
Organize data using the school community data June 14, 17 – 20, 2019
templates

Phase 1: Assess
Survey July 1 – 5, 2019

Phase 2: Plan
Writing the SIP August 5 – 9, 2019

Phase 3: Act
Rubrics

Criteria Description Scale


Strategic Importance The number of other areas that
will benefit when the
improvement area is addressed 5 – Very High
Urgency The urgency or need to 4 – High
improve the area as soon as 3 – Moderate
possible 2 – Low
Magnitude The number of learners that 1 – Very Low
will benefit when the
improvement area is addressed
Feasibility The degree to which the
improvement area is within
the school’s mandate and
control

Improvemen Strategic Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation


t Areas Importanc
e
Erase D’ 5 5 5 5 5 Very
Waste (Zero
Waste) High

You might also like