Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit - 8 Climate Change: 8.0 Objectives
Unit - 8 Climate Change: 8.0 Objectives
1
MBO-07
8.1 Introduction
2
MBO-07
3
MBO-07
4
MBO-07
5
MBO-07
7
MBO-07
8
MBO-07
NOx &
4. SOx Agricultural and industrial processes.
11
MBO-07
Fig. 8.5 : Grapical Report of increase in Key Green House gases (in IPCC 2007)
IPCC 2007 report shows that most of the increase of the last
thousand years has occurred in the past 200 years. The radiative
forcing of these gases is related to their concentration.
Methane (CH4) - The chief source are sulphur springs, volcanic
eruptions, organic waste deposition and decaying vegetation ,
animal matter,(aquatic habitats) combustion processes as stove,
furnaces, open fire(forest),burning coal mines, power plants,
production and transportation of fossil fuel, etc.
Sulphur compounds- From amongst several other major sulphur
compounds in the atmosphere, the oxides of sulphur are the
most serious pollutants. The chief sources of oxides of sulphur
are the combustion of coal and petroleum. Thus most of the
oxides come from thermal power plants and other coal based
plants and smelting complexes. Automobiles also released SO2 in
air.
12
MBO-07
14
MBO-07
CFC Uses
15
MBO-07
(a)Cancer
The most common forms of skin cancer in humans, basal and
squamous cell carcinomas have been strongly linked to UVB
exposure. Scientists have estimated that every 1% decrease in
long-term stratospheric ozone would increase the incidence of
these cancers by 2%.
Another form of skin cancer, malignant melanoma, is much less
common but far more dangerous, being lethal in about 15–20%
of the cases diagnosed. The relationship between malignant
melanoma and ultraviolet exposure is not yet fully understood,
but it appears that both UVB and UVA are involved. Because of
this uncertainty, it is difficult to estimate the impact of ozone
depletion on melanoma incidence.
17
MBO-07
19
MBO-07
•
It helps dampen the effects of CO2 emissions we humans
generate (because the more CO2 in the atmosphere, the
more productive green plants are and the more CO2 they
draw down);
•
It helps crops grow faster because they are among the
myriad plants fertilized by CO2
Of course, increased CO2mean an overall increase in crop yields
since we must aware of other factors in the confounding effects
of climate change (e.g., heat stress, changing precipitation
patterns, increasing weather variability, rising sea levels). The
overall impact of crop yields will be a mixed bag, And some new
research suggests negative points in the fertilization effect‘s in
place of positive effect on crops. Sure, increased CO2 will make
crops more productive, but the quality of the crops may be
degraded.
The term 'carbon dioxide fertilization' as it applies to the area of
the environment can be defined as 'The enhancement of the
growth of plants as a result of increased atmospheric CO2
concentration. Depending on their mechanism of
photosynthesis, certain types of plants are more sensitive to
changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration.
Carbon fertilization is a theory that states increased CO2 resulted
by global warming would cause a positive agricultural
productivity in certain geographical locations, instead of
negative which global warming advocates seem to claim. The
CO2 fertilization effect is not going to “save” us from the
consequences of global warming. News coverage has focused
almost solely on the “greening” angle of increased levels of
atmospheric CO2 and neglects to mention negative impacts of
climate change that are highly detrimental to human agriculture
and plant ecosystems in general. Climate impacts like drought,
floods, extreme weather, shifting seasons, and increasing ranges
20
MBO-07
23
MBO-07
24
MBO-07
8.10 Summary
8.11 Glossary
27
MBO-07
28
MBO-07
8.13 References
30