Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Fernando Collantes v.

Viente Renomeron

FACTS: This complaint for disbarment is relative to the administrative case filed by Atty. Collantes, house counsel for V&
G Better Homes Subdivision, Inc. (V&G), against Atty. Renomeron, Register of Deeds of Tacloban City, for the latter’s
irregular actuations with regard to the application of V&G for registration of 163 pro forma Deed of Absolute Sale with
Assignment (in favor of GSIS) of lots in its subdivision.

Although V&G complied with the desired requirements, respondent suspended the registration of the documents with
certain “special conditions” between them, which was that V&G should provide him with weekly round trip ticket from
Tacloban to Manila plus P2,000.00 as pocket money per trip, or, in lieu thereof, the sale of respondent’s Quezon City
house and lot by V&G or GSIS representatives.

Eventually, respondent formally denied the registration of the documents. He himself elevated the question on the
registrability of the said documents to Administrator Bonifacio (of the National Land Titles and Deeds Registration
Administration-NLTDRA). The Administrator then resolved in favor of the registrability of the documents. Despite the
resolution of the Administrator, the respondent still refused the registration thereof but demanded from the parties
interested the submission of additional requirements not adverted in his previous denial.

ISSUES: (1) WON the respondent, as a lawyer, may also be disciplined by the Court for his malfeasance as a public
official, and (2) WON the Code of Professional Responsibility applies to government service in the discharge of official
tasks.

HELD: (1) Yes, a lawyer’s misconduct as a public official also constitutes a violation of his oath as a lawyer. The lawyer’s
oath imposes upon every lawyer the duty to delay no man for money or malice. The lawyer’s oath is a source of
obligations and its violation is a ground for his suspension, disbarment or other disciplinary action.

(2) Yes, the Code of Professional Responsibility applies to government service in the discharge of their official tasks
(Canon 6). The Code forbids a lawyer to engage in unlawful, dishonest, immoral or deceitful conduct (Rule 1.01, Code of
Professional Responsibility), or delay any man’s cause “for any corrupt motive or interest” (Rule 1.03 

You might also like