Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unpublished Price Sensitive Information
Unpublished Price Sensitive Information
Insider trading is the buying or selling of a security by someone who has access to material non-
public information about the security. Insider trading can be illegal or legal depending on when
the insider makes the trade. It is illegal when the material information is still non-public.
The main aim of this law is that to ensure traders that no one is gained by trading on ‘insider’ or
‘unpublished’ information- information that is not made public. Another aim of this law is to
make the information available to all the participants. The enforcement of insider trading laws
increases the market liquidity and decreases the cost of equity
Sec 2(e(e) “insider” means any person who, (i) is or was connected with the company or is
deemed to have been connected with the company and is reasonably expected to have access
10[***] to unpublished price sensitive information in respect of securities of 11[a] company, or
(ii) has received or has had access to such unpublished price sensitive information ;]
(n) "unpublished price sensitive information" means any information, relating to a company or
its securities, directly or indirectly, that is not generally available which upon becoming
generally available, is likely to materially affect the price of the securities and shall, ordinarily
including but not restricted to, information relating to the following: – (i) financial results; (ii)
dividends; (iii) change in capital structure; (iv) mergers, de-mergers, acquisitions, delistings,
disposals and expansion of business and such other transactions; (v) changes in key managerial
personnel; and (vi) material events in accordance with the listing agreement
In India, SEBI (Insider Trading) Regulation, 1992 framed under the Section 11 of the SEBI Act,
1992 intends to curb and prevent the menace of insider trading in securities.
The penalties and punishments for committing insider trading have been defined under Chapter
IV-A of the SEBI Act. The penalties have been discussed below according to the SEBI
(Amendment) Act, 2002.
Section 15(G)(i)– if an insider either on its own or on behalf of any person has dealt
on behalf of his company any unpublished information then he may be fined with RS.
25 crores or 3 times the profit made, whichever is higher.
Section 15G(ii)– if an insider has given any price sensitive information then he may
be fined up to RS. 25 crores or 3 times the profit made.
Section 15G(iii)– if an insider has procured any other person to deal in securities of
anybody corporate on basis of published information then he may be fined up to RS.
25 crores or 3 times the profit made which is higher.
The third way of attacking the problem is by encouraging the companies to practice self
regulation and taking prophylactic action. This is inherently connected to the field of
corporate governance. It is a means by which the company signals to the market that effective
self regulation is in place and that investors are safe to invest in their securities. In addition to
prohibiting inappropriate actions (which might not necessarily be prohibited), self regulation is
also considered an effective means of creating shareholder value. Companies can always regulate
their directors/officers beyond what is prohibited by the law.
3. No insider shall -
(i) either on his own behalf or on behalf of any other person, deal in securities of a
company listed on any stock exchange when in possession of any unpublished price
sensitive information; or
Provided that nothing contained above shall be applicable to any communication required
in the ordinary course of business or profession or employment or under any law.
No company shall deal in the securities of another company or associate of that other company
while in possession of any unpublished price sensitive information.
An Insider is any person who by virtue of a duty owed to the company is expected to have (or
has had) access to unpublished price sensitive information. Just by being privy to price sensitive
non public information a person does not ipso facto become an insider. Thus a taxi driver, who
has no connection with the company and overhears two directors discussing unpublished price
sensitive information would not fall under the proscriptions of the Act. Every person who
chances across inside information is not liable under the regulations. The insider trading
regulations are not hypothesized over ‘parity of information’ theory. To draw an analogy, a
person finds a gold coin lying on the road, and appropriates it for his benefit – would hardly
seem a crime punishable as would a fiduciary who is entrusted with a gold coin and who
misappropriates it. A law which penalizes people based on a parity of information would be
unnecessarily unfair and courts must guard against too broad an interpretation of the regulations.
An insider, first of all, buys the stock of the Company at the existing market price. He then
spreads some price sensitive information relating to the Company to select group of people, who
on the basis of such information will buy such stocks and would further spread the information.
When this information reaches a large number of persons, it pushes up the sales volume and
price of the stock. After a certain price of the stock is reached, insider sells his stock, as do the
ones close to him before others do the same. As now everyone tries to sell his or her stock, its
price will fall down. When information is available to everyone, the stock reaches back to its
realistic price level, which results in huge loss to common investors2
[Regulation 3A not to apply in certain cases. 3B. (1) In a proceeding against a company in
respect of regulation 3A, it shall be a defence to prove that it entered into a transaction in the
securities of a listed company when the unpublished price sensitive information was in the
possession of an officer or employee of the company, if : (a) the decision to enter into the
transaction or agreement was taken on its behalf by a person or persons other than that officer or
employee; and (b) such company has put in place such systems and procedures which demarcate
the activities of the company in such a way that the person who enters into transaction in
securities on behalf of the company cannot have access to information which is in possession of
other officer or employee of the company; and
it had in operation at that time, arrangements that could reasonably be expected to ensure that the
information was not communicated to the person or persons who made the decision and that no
advice with respect to the transactions or agreement was given to that person or any of those
persons by that officer or employee; and (d) the information was not so communicated and no
such advice was so given. (2) In a proceeding against a company in respect of regulation 3A
which is in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, it shall be defence to prove
that acquisition of shares of a listed company was as per the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997.]
Certain provisions of the Companies Act,1956 are still in force. S 195 of the Act of 2013
provides for prohibition of insider trading of securities.
For purposes of sub-regulation (3), the board of directors shall require the parties to execute
agreements to contract confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations on the part of such parties
and such parties shall keep information so received confidential, except for the purpose of sub-
regulation (3), and shall not otherwise trade in securities of the company when in possession of
unpublished price sensitive information.