This document contains a midterm exam for a Philippine History course. The exam consists of two parts - a true/false section with 15 statements about Philippine history and an essay section with 5 prompts. The true/false statements cover a range of topics in Philippine history including primary sources, important historical events, figures, and periods. The essay prompts ask students to define and discuss key historical concepts like primary vs secondary sources, history vs historiography, internal vs external criticism, and the roles of history.
This document contains a midterm exam for a Philippine History course. The exam consists of two parts - a true/false section with 15 statements about Philippine history and an essay section with 5 prompts. The true/false statements cover a range of topics in Philippine history including primary sources, important historical events, figures, and periods. The essay prompts ask students to define and discuss key historical concepts like primary vs secondary sources, history vs historiography, internal vs external criticism, and the roles of history.
This document contains a midterm exam for a Philippine History course. The exam consists of two parts - a true/false section with 15 statements about Philippine history and an essay section with 5 prompts. The true/false statements cover a range of topics in Philippine history including primary sources, important historical events, figures, and periods. The essay prompts ask students to define and discuss key historical concepts like primary vs secondary sources, history vs historiography, internal vs external criticism, and the roles of history.
Reading in Philippine History II. Essay (10 points each)
Midterm Exams – 1st Sem. SY 2018-2019 1. Discuss the distinction between the primary I. True or False: Write T if the statement is True and secondary sources and cite an example. and F if the statement is False. 2. Discuss the difference between history and 1. Non-written documents are not useful as historiography. primary sources in conducting historical research. 3. Define and discuss the meaning of content and 2. The assassination of Ninoy Aquino is an context. important historical event that fueled people’s anger and condemnation of the dictator 4. Differentiate internal and external criticism. Ferdinand Marcos. 3. Apolinario Mabini penned the “Kartilya ng 5. Discuss the major roles of history in our life Katipunan.” and our society. 4. Magellan and his fleet received a warm welcome from all of the chieftains and local leader in the Philippine Islands. 5. The Americans radically altered the social structure in the Philippines after they took over from Spain in terms of socioeconomic equality. 6. The “Proclamation of Philippine Independence” reflects the social and economic discontent of the masses about land ownership and other agrarian issues. 7. The enmity between Aguinaldo and Bonifacio did not affect how former’s revolutionary government credited Bonifacio to the beginnings of the Philippine Revolution. 8. Corazon Aquino did not want to forge alliance with the United States because the latter was a known important ally of Marcos. 9. The conservative attitude of the youth toward sexuality did not change since the Spanish period until the 1930’s. 10. The forces of Magellan were successful in defeating and conquering Lapulapu. 11. Historical interpretation is based on the historian’s judgment on how the past should be seen. 12. We make senses of the past through historical interpretation. 13. Multi-perspectivity is a quality of historical writing attributed to a variety of lenses that may be used to view the past. 14. There is only one account of the First Catholic Mass in the Philippines. 15. The significance of the martyrdom of the GOMBURZA is questioned by historians.