Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CIA Machinations Chile: in in 1970
CIA Machinations Chile: in in 1970
Kristian C. Gustafson
understood.
+ :
35
Chile
Colbynoted that
Nixon was furious
about Allendes
were caught off-guard when he game plan
won a plurality. Undeterred by
election]. make the economy scream
submarine base in the Western One in 10 chance, perhaps, scious decision to exclude the
but save Chile:
Hemisphere. At a more global CIA from the planning and exe
Worth Spending
level, Washington was struggling cution of the policy, because it
Not concerned risks involved
to maintain momentum in the
No involvement of Embassy
negotiations for the first Strate
$10,000,000 available, more
gic Arms Limitation Treaty. US Congress, Senate, Alleged Assassi
if neceessary nation Plots Involving Foreign Leaders,
full-time jobbest men Interim Report of the Select Committee
It was in this framework of glo we have to Study Government Operations with
bal power plays between the Respect to Intelligence Activities, 94th
Congress, 2nd Session, (Washington,
4 William Colby and Peter Forbnth, DC: US Government Printing Office, 20
HenryA. Kissinger, White House Years Honorable Men: Mv Life in the CIA November 1975), p. 227. Henceforward
(Boston. MA: LitUe & Brown, 1979). (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, Alleged Plots.
particularly chapters XV and XVI. 1978). p. 303. 6
Alleged Plots, p. 228.
36
Chile
Disagreements
between the CIA and
the State Department
believed that the CIAs warnings assassination was within the
would be a hallmark of
of impending electoral defeat for guidelines given to him by the
Chiles centrist
parties were American operations President, and I had made that
exaggerated. The CIA, for its in Chile. clear to my fellows. ~0
the Departments of State and of Project Fubelt, 16 September 1970. 1970. A false-flag officer or false-flag
Defense were to be excluded from
All CIA cables and memoranda used in ger is an officer who operates under a
this study were accessed at forged third-party passport. False-flag
the planning (removing the US
<www. foi a. state.govfvSearchP gers are used to increase the plausible
ambassador to Chile and his
CIA.asp>. Unless otherwise noted, all deniability of an operation, should itbe
defense attachØ from the loop), from the CIA.
documents cited are compromised.
and appointed the CIAs director Colby, p. 303. Cable, CIA HQ to Santiago Station,
operations, Thomas
of covert Memorandum, Deletion] Situation Highest Levels Here Continue, 7 Octo
Karamessines, to head the Report #1, 17 September 1970. ber 1970.
37
Chile
Although
Gen. Schneiders
doctrine of non
forces were largely drawn from intervene against the installa
the middle class and,
intervention angered
as such, tion of an Allende government.
were conservative and anti many in the military,
Allende. Nonetheless, as an that anger did not
institution, the military was necessarily equate to The Ambassadors
strongly constitutionalist, a action against Perspective
stand championed by Gen. RenØ
Schneider Chereau, who had
Allende].
The US Ambassador, Edward
become the commander-in-chief Korry, was aware of a long his
of the Chilean Armed Forces in tory of mini-plotting in the
October 1969.14 Underscoring Chilean military and did not put
the a-political nature of the insti much stock in the chances for
tution, the Chilean constitution effective action against Allende.
describes the Army as a non essarily equate to readiness to The outgoing Chilean president,
deliberative body.5 In May take action.7 Christian Democrat Eduardo
1970, during the election cam Frei, had tried the patience of
paign, Schneider had told the A sobering consideration was the many conservative army officers,
newspaper El Mercurio that the possibility that a coup attempt and plotting had been rife within
Army would respect the constitu could trigger mass protests, the military during his tenure.9
tional process and make no move street violence, or even civil war, Mutinies and small revolts had
at intervention.6 Although this given Allendes strong base of become subject of concern,
a
Schneider Doctrine of non support. To thwart such violence made more pressing by the revolt
intervention angered many in the and secure a post-coup govern of the Tacna tank regiment
staunchly conservative military ment, incipient plotters assessed ostensibly over soldiers payin
because of Allendes socialist that the military would need to October 1969. During the Tac
platform, that anger did not nec- act as a whole to
rally behind the nazo rebellion, several generals
new leaders. Potential plotters had fled the country or had been
who were contacted by US opera removed from command after
~
Cable. Santiago Station to CIA HQ. tives reported that their being accused of coup plotting,
Effort to Contact and Influence Chil
commander-in-chief, Gen. among them Gen. Roberto Viaux,
ean Military Figures, 2 October 1970.
Schneider, will only agree to mil the alleged leader, who was
Biographic ,nformation on Schneider
can be found in Grandes Biogruph (as de itary intervention if forced to do forced into retirement.2
la Histona de Chile, Defensor del con
so.8 They concluded, therefore,
stitucionaljsmo de las Fuerzas Arm adas that Schneider had to be con After Allendes election, schem
RenØ Schneider Chereau: 1913-1970, vinced to join the pro- ing continued. A CIA report of
at: chttpi/icarito.tercera.clmiograph interventionist camp soon. If he 26 September 1970 noted that a
ias/1958-1999Thios/schneider.htm>.
Luis
persisted in his constitutionalist number of former Chilean army
Vitale, et. al., Para Recuperar
La Memorta Historica: Fret, Allende stance, he would have to be officers were attempting to infil
YP,nochet removed from his position, in trate leftist groups in the hopes
(Santiago, Chile Ediciones
ChileAmenca-CESOC, 1999), p. 181.
order to allow the military to of conducting terrorist acts that
The Spanish of the constitution reads:
La fuerza
publica es esencialmente
obediente. Ningun cuerpo armado ~
Vitale, p. 187. See also Paul E. Sig 19
Albert L. Michaels, Background to a
puede deliberer. mund, The Overthrow ofAllende and the Coup, paper presented at the State
16 Andrea
Ruiz-Esquide Figueroa, Las Politics of Chile 1964-1976 (Pittsburgh, University of New York, 18-19 October
Fuerzas Arm adas Durante Los Gobier PA: Pittsburgh University Press, 1977), 1974. (Buffalo, NY: State University of
nos de Edvardo Fret YSalvadorAllende p. 99. New York, 1975) p.9.
(Santiago, Ch,le: Centro de Estudios del 8
Memorandum, Chile Staton to CIA 20
Memorandum, Chile Station to CIA
Desarrollo, 1993~, p. 51 (note 1). HQ, Intelligence,~ 26 September 1970. HQ, Intelligence, 26 September 1970.
38
Chile
US Amb. Korry
warned. . .
that to
promote a coup . . . was
team and the State
would compel an anti-communist country CIA
to court a failure as
crackdown by Frei and the Army. Department that to promote a
rily civilian rightist groups that Pigs. sonnel at hand was to court a
sional decision period and be fer that we ceased to cheek out Fubelt, as Track II was officially
almost impossible post-inaugura all such reports and to be titled, to be a crash
endeavour.26
tion 22
By mentioning a totally surprised by whatever
specific name, Korry was trying might develop in the armed
to exorcise the influence of this forces. In the present circum 21
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
stances it is a waste activity
particular individual, at the cen Ambassador called in Defense AttachØ
for all concerned. Hence Jam and DCOS, 08 October 1970.
instructing CIA station] to 21
Cable, Track 1 Propaganda Place
21
Memorandum, CIA Intelligence Note desist from the normal efforts ments, 10 October 1970. Emphasis in
toFile, 23 September 1970. to learn of possible military original. At the time, Korrys assess
22
Memorandum, Korry to Crimmins, 11 ment was accurate. Even local CIA of
moves.23
August, 1970. State Department cables ficers considered the task of thwarting
accessed at: <http://www.foia.state.gov/ Allende to be a mission impossible. As
SearchColls/CollsSearch.asp> using a Ignorant of the Track II initia one CIA officer later said, the idea of a
list all function for all three tranches tive, Korry warned both the in- military overthrow had not occurred to
ofState Chile Collection. All ca us as a feasible solution. See Seymour
bles/memoranda accessed May/June Hersh, The Price of Power (New York,
2002. Subsequent State Department 23
Memorandum, Ambassador Korry to NY: Summit Books, 1983), p. 277.
documents are marked State in paren Under-Secretary Johnson, 6 October 25
Cable, CIA] Situation Report #1, 17
theses following the citation. 1970. (State) September 1970.
39
Chile
corns and junior officers.28 met with a false flag officer] who Ca,nilo Valenzuela, if possi
Another memorandum pointed said he had talked with Gen. ble, on date deleted] Oct and
out that since the Chilean mili Viaux, and as a consequence is brief him along these lines
tary was byled a man who convinced that Viaux has no mili CIA agent] will take oppor
respected the constitutionality of tary support.31 This was tunity to caution Valenzuela
the Allende government, the ser troubling to the CIA
officers, who about precipitate moves by
vicemen lacked a serving general passed to their Headquarters the Genl Viaux (of which Valen
officer to centralize the plotting opinion that Viaux was not only zuela possibly cognizant).
and look to Gen. Viaux for inspi dangerously unstable, but likely
ration.~ As early as 23 to lead whatever forces he could 3. CIA false-flagger] who
September, the CIA was report muster into a premature action briefed COS evening date
ing that Viaux was in touch with that would do the anti-Allende del] Oct, promised attempt to
active duty army officers who forces more harm then good. contact Valenzuela deleted].
40
Chile
not going to
run a coup
for the Chileans.
USG support for any later Moreover, the United States was
move. (FYI: COS] relieved to not going to run a coup for the
learn CIA asset] not goad. Chileans. On 6 October, Viaux
ing on Viaux, which we] approached the CIA and asked
would view as height of folly). for weapons to start an upris
A bloodbath led by an uncontrol ingbizarrely, he wanted
4.Urge you do not covey lable and mentally tmstable paralyzing gas grenades.~~ The
impression that STA has officer was not the aim of the CIA in Santiago turned down
sure-fire method of halt mission, as the CIA understood the proposal categorically, with
ing, let alone triggering it. In short, right-wing the reason given that USG]
a govern
coup attempts.34 ment was not attractive to the would not provide arms if the
CIA or to the US government, for golpe (coup) were to be made con
The fourth paragraph of this it would ultimately be counter tingent on a favorable US]
productive. Associating them reaction. USGI insists that the
message makes a point repeated
decision to move must be a Chil
often by the CIA agents on the selves with dictatorial and
eanl decision~ This does not
ground: They were not puppet bloodthirsty regimes would do lit
mean that forceful coup was
a
masters, capable of fully control tle to forward American efforts
entirely out of the minds of the
ling the Chilean officers they for increased influence in the
contacted. The message had CIA at this point, for there were
region.
routine exhortations on the seri
already been passed that the
United States favored ousness of USG intent to attempt
military
The US personnel writing cables deny the] presidency to
intervention, but the Santiago
at the time did not assume that Allende4 The CIA wanted the
CIA operatives did not want to
bear responsibility for unfortu thwarting Allende had to be vio Chileans to do it on their own,
lent. To the modern reader, but found Viauxs plans to be
nate results should a coup be led
by a man such as Viaux: military intervention implies totally inadequate~
violence. In the case of Chile,
however, what the CIA officers
If Viaux moves on his own
William 1. Robinson, Promoting Pot
were looking for was, in the first
and succeeds (which is a dis
yarchy: Globalization, US Intervention.
tinct possibility) then we face instance, not actually a coup.
and Hegemony (Cambridge, UK: Cam
the unpleasant prospect that Rather, they sought some type of bridge University Press, 1996~, p. 161.
Viauxs junta will be an auto parliamentary subterfuge, where Also Gabriel Smirnow, The Revolution
cratic, nationalistic military the military would declare a state Disarmed, Chile 1970.1973 (New York,
of emergency and seize power NY: Monthly Review Press, 1979),
govern ment, which may not
p. 1~11.
necessarily be pro- US. temporarily, justifying the disso
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
Accordingly, Viaux should lution of the government in order
It Reported, 13 October 1970.
still be considered only as an to call new elections. Chileans 38
Cable, CIA FIQ to Santiago Station,
opportunity of last resort. - -
called this a whitecoup.~5 The Viaux Recontacted ASAP, 13 October
A Viaux Government, though obstacle to this preferred out 1970.
41
Chile
October Viaux] will just be too forces assembled, and were per ation.
hot to handle.~2 To make mat haps a bit scared of moving. But
ters worse, the CIA knew that the White House (the highest 5. Above not intended to be
the Chilean Communist Party levels46) was demanding a solu exhaustive enumeration of some
(PCCh) had agents infiltrated tion, a military solution, and all of key factors that
ought to have
close to Viaux and his associ other considerations are second
hearing on your final determina
ates. It would be foolish of ary.~~ Santiago CIA station
The
tion. You have asked us to
Washington to offer Viaux contin sent back what can only be called
provoke chaos in Chile. Thru
ued support if the PCCh would a cynical reply. It is worth quot
Viaux solution we provide you
later be able to disclose Ameri ing at length: with formula for chaos which
can activities.~~ Viaux was a
unlikely to be bloodless. To dis
disaster waiting to happen and 1. Station has arrived at Viaux simulate US involvement will
had to be kept at a distance. solution by process of elimi nation: clearly be impossible. Station
CIA] team, as you know, has
While the CIA wanted to keep given most serious consideration
a. Alto Mando (high com
to all plans suggested by HQs
Viaux at arms-length, the pres mand) solution cannot be
sure on Agency officers in counterparts. We conclude that
achieved.
Santiago to come up with a solu none of them stand even a remote
tion to the Allende problem was b. (Frei Solution] cannot be chance of achieving USC] objec
achieved. tive. Hence, Viaux gamble,
despite high risk factors, may
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ, commend itself to you.48
In Fast Moving Situation, 10 October Hersh, p. 286.
1970. Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
In three pages, the CIA COS in
42
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ, Fact May Not Be Able, 03 October
It Stations Firm Opinion,lO October 1970. Santiago made dramatically clear
1970. That this communication re Cable, CIA HQ to Santiago Station, the problems he was facing in
ferred to the attachØ can be determined Highest Levels Here Continue, 07 Oc
by comparison of this cable with one cit tober 1970.
ed in the Senate report Alleged Plots. Cable, CIA HQ to Santiago Station, ~
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
Memorandum, Track II, 12 October Instructs You Contact Military, 07 Oc Station has arrived at Viaux Solution,
1970. tober 1970. 10 October 1970.
42
Chile
sible task. Constructing a coup attempt, and (b) a method of ing him against precipitate
in country where no one was
a controlling the pro-Allende action. In essence our mes
willing to start the action was mobs which very probably sage was to state: We have
possible, but not if the United would swarm through down reviewed your plans, and
States wanted its involvement to town Santiago in the event of based on your information
remain secret, and certainly not a coup attempt.51 and ours, we come to the con
if it wanted the action to be clusion that your plans for a
bloodless. As far as the Santiago coup at this time cannot suc
The bottom line was that a Viaux
station was concerned, Viaux was ceed. Failing, they may
coup would almost certainly
a no-win on all counts. Some reduce your capabilities for
result in American embarrass
days later, Santiago sent another the future. Preserve your
ment and strengthening of a
message to Langley: Station assets the time will come
Allendes position. Inputs from .
. .
would appreciate firm and realis when you with all your other
both the CIA COS in Santiago
tic guidelines from headquarters friends can do something.
and Amb. Korry made it clear
on what objectives to pursue in You will continue to have our
that Viaux did not have more
further dealings with General support. ~
than one chance in twentyper
Viaux.~~
haps lessto launch a successful
coup. The point had been made, Many commentators have
and the Track II staff, Kissinger pointed out that this message
Reality Sinks In
included, came to the conclusion does not truly turn off the
that . a coup climate does not Viaux plotting Kissinger or, as
Following this cable, CIA Head . .
43
Chile
short term with the only individ purchase weapons.56 This was a ner of
Santiago. The contact
ual actively plotting a coup, the last-ditch effort, and the Agency requested three submachine-
executive took the next logical was told by another contact on guns and tear-gas grenades.
step of planning for a coherent the same day that Name Despite puzzlement over the
policy toward an Allende deleted] believes that Viauxs need for these items, CIA Head
government. attempt to kidnap Schneider will quarters authorized Santiago to
not be made and now sees no pos fill the requestthey were deliv
sibility for anything to happen ered at 0200 hours on 22
Best Laid Plans... October. 62
prior 24 October. CIA agent]
. .
44
Chile
Suddenly, events
deviated from the
45
Chile
Whatever the intended outcome not in the interests of the Ameri no further tasks for the false
from the kidnapping/assassina can government. Could they flaggers at this time he will be
tion, it ultimately increased the have prevented it, and, if so, did instructed depart Santiago del]
desire of the politicians and most they make any efforts to do so? October ~
Moreover, as of 21
of the military to ensure that the October, the COS in Santiago was
constitutional process was fol What the Americans did and did developing post-inauguration
lowed. Aithough Valenzuela was asset-management plans.~~
not know becomes clear in the
in a powerful position and could
message traffic immediately fol
have taken over, the mood had
lowing the murder. A cable of 22 The record shows that the kid
changed so dramatically that he October relates intelligence to napping took the station by
did not make a move. On Satur the effect that Viauxs gang had surprise and that the CIA did
day, 24 October, Allendes election been told that their coup attempt not have absolute knowledge of
as president was duly confirmed
was to be carried out that day, Schneiders attackers. A cable,
by the Chilean congresswith and that it would be initiatedby written on 3 November 1970,
153 votes in favor and only 42
something big that would take discussed a review of the kidnap
votes either against or abstain
place in the early morning hours. ping attempt by the COS in
ing.72 Attempts to prevent The cable continued by speculat Santiago, which stated that a
Allende from taking power had
ing, after the fact, that the particular Chilean contact con
failed. assassination attempt on Gen firmed neither he nor name sec
the plotters hoped to use to ini may not have been involved in
Although a ~1successful military
tiate their coup efforts.~~ the attack, and was seeking con
move against Allende had been firmation from its Chilean.
unlikely from the start, the death
The uncertainty of the CIA can contacts, that indicates they did
of Gen. Schneider guaranteed the
be ascribed both to lack of con
collapse of American hopes.
tact with Viaux and a reduction
Clearly Schneiders murder was 7~ Cable,
Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
in intelligence-gathering assets.
Suggested Retired Captain, 19 Octo
The CIA had started to pull out ber 1970.
71
Memorandum, Intelligence Note, 23 its false-flag officers from Chile a 7~
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
October 1970 See also Memorandum, Reflect Realistic Assessment, 21 Octo
Track II, 24 October 1970. ber 1970.
72
Sigmund, p. 123. See also Memoran ~
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ, 76
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
dum, Intelligence, Recent Develop Supporters of General Vioux. 22 Octo On 2 Nov COS Reviewed, 3 November
ments in Chile. 2 November 1970. ber 1970. 1970.
46
Chile
not have firm knowledge to begin sent on 29 October, hints at the that Washington understood that
with. If they planned the
had confusion in Santiago in the his death would benefit Allende
attack, as some accounts main aftermath of the assassination, more than it would his
opposi
tain, would they not have known and the trouble it caused station tion by rallying the army fully
who executed the plan? Another officers in determining what was behind the flag of constitutional
cable discusses their lack of going on. The message says that ism.SO They trusted-Valenzuela
knowledge: marshal law made their work dif to carry out a kidnapping, but not
ficult, but that on 28 October Viaux, and to the last minute
they were able to make first con they attempted to keep Viaux
Station unaware if assassina
tact with name deleted] from moving on his own.81 The
tion was premeditated or
-
elements linked with Viaux. three masks.78 evidence shows that he ordered
Important factor to bear in Viaux to stand down at least
A CIA review of its own actions,
mind is that Armed Forces, over the short term. Did Kiss
undertaken in 1973, states that
and not retired officers or inger intend Track II to end, as
three submachine-guns were
extreme rightists, set he has testified? Probably, but
Schneider up for execution or provided to three military offic that was at a time when the
ers who planned to use them in
abduction. Before trying to
. .
White House, 40 Committee,
instigating an uprising by the Track II staff, and the CIA
anticipate further course of
Armed Forces. This program was
events station would like to thought that Viaux only was the
conducted at the request of Presi
await events of 23rd Oct available option. Kissinger
dent Nixon with the
which will obviously be ended the Viaux operation while
understanding that it was not to
decisive. ~ urging that pressure be kept on
become known to the State
Allende until such time as new
Department or other members of
Uncertain who had carried out marching orders are given.83
the 40 Committee.~ This is all
the attack, the CIA worried that What Kissinger wanted was
true, but were the weapons given
the weapons it had provided to Viaux stopped for the time being
purposefully to assassinate
without an end to all domestic
Valenzuelas group might have Schneider? The CIA and the
plotting, which might pay off in
been responsible for Schneiders
White House did not want
death. Were the American
Schneider assassinated. Docu
weapons in fact used in the kid ments from early October reveal ~
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA HQ,
napping attempt that turned into
Review of Significant Developments, 9
murder? The appears to
answer
October 1970.
be no. One CIA cable from Chile, 78
Cable, Santiago Station to CIA UQ. Memorandum, Track II, 19 October
47
Chile
ested military parties know our to second guess ringleaders. Headquarters informs Santiago
position.8~ Whether the US posi Indeed it was pointedly stated that we] feel we must be pre
tion made a tremendous that the onus for action belonged pared advise higher echelons of
difference is matter of to the Chilean military from that nature of new military leaders
a dispute,
and time forward. On note, the and their programs in event
depends on how one views a wry
the autonomy of the Chilean cable offers the observation that
coup attempted or even suc
officers who, even once American this whole operation was] so ceeds.~ Karemessines stated in
support for a coup apparently unprofessional and insecure that, the same Congressional investi
was toned down, continued to
in the] Chilean setting, it could gation that he had kept the
plot. This was clear from the stand a chance of succeeding. White Rouse abreast of all
moment that the CIA tried to All that was required of the sta developments. His statements
switch tion was to assure the plotters
off
the plotters: Sta appear plausible in light of cur
tion false-flag officer met with that they would not be left high rently available documentation.
Chilean] on del] October and and dry if their coup succeeded.
attempted to dissuade Viaux This we have done.86 J{j~ The bottom line, in my view, is
group from undertaking a coup. inger, nonetheless, was most that Kissinger and the White
The group, however, had met on likely happy to hear that the Rouse were aware of the coup
16 October and decided to oppositions plotting against plotting and were happy to see it
attempt a 21 22 Octo Allende was going ahead, even if go ahead, but at the same time
coup on or
ber. This was not restricted to the reports he heard offered lit had no control over events. In
Viauxs tle chance of light of the CIAs surprise
group; reporting indi success. over
48
Chile
it may have been impossible to Frei, Schneider, or which had always been a part of
separate the plotting of one Viaux to march to its Track I, continued for several
group from the next. tune. more years.
-
the deleted word be Fubelt? right force at all costs, a caution
II was never really ended. What
Regardless, Track II, which told to do was to con
that sharply limited the exercise
we were
aimed at precipitating a military
tinue our efforts. Stay alert, and of American power. For all of
takeover to prevent Allendes
do what we could to contribute to Americas banks and invest
the eventual achievement and ments, nuclear missiles and
the objectives and purposes of not able
~
Memorandum, Helms to Kissinger, aircraft carriers, it was
49
Cryptologic Museum
MAR