China Is Breaking Hong Kong Treaty With UK, Says Boris Johnson

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

China is breaking Hong Kong treaty with UK, says Boris

Johnson
PM denounces new security law and promises bespoke visa for 2.9 million Hongkongers

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor


Wed 1 Jul 2020 14.32 BST

Boris Johnson denounced China’s imposition of a security law on Hong Kong as a “clear and
serious” violation of its treaty with Britain, vowing to introduce a bespoke five-year visa for as
many as 2.9 million Hong Kong citizens with British national (overseas) status.

Speaking at prime minister’s questions on Wednesday he said the law introduced by the
Chinese government constituted a clear and serious breach of the Sino-British Joint
Declaration, signed in 1984 and aimed at smoothing the transition when the territory was
handed back to China in 1997.

The UK believes Beijing’s move violates Hong Kong’s autonomy and is in direct conflict with
the territory’s Basic Law, its mini-constitution. The law also threatens the freedoms and rights
protected by the joint declaration.

The prime minister said: “We have made clear that if China continued down this path we
would introduce a new route to those with British national (overseas) status to enter the UK
granting them limited leave to remain with the ability to live and work in the UK and thereafter
to apply for citizenship, and that is precisely what we will do now.”
The foreign secretary, Dominic Raab, promised the UK would honour its commitment to the
people of Hong Kong. “We will grant BN(O)s five years’ limited leave to remain, with the right
to work or study. After these five years, they will be able to apply for settled status.

“After further 12 months with settled status, they will be able to apply for citizenship.
 This is
a special, bespoke, set of arrangements developed for the unique circumstances we face,” Raab
told MPs.


He added: “All those with BN(O) status will be eligible, as will their family dependants who
are usually resident in Hong Kong. The Home Office will put in place a simple, streamlined,
application process. There will be no quota on numbers.”

Describing the Chinese moves as “a grave and deeply disturbing step”, he warned that China
would erode trust “in its willingness to keep its word and live up to its promises”.

But Raab set out no specific plans to sanction China either collectively or by punishing
individual officials through new legislation due to be introduced by the Foreign Office this
month after considerable delay. He said the legislation would be published before the recess
and it would include the first designations, but did not specify if Chinese officials would be
included.

Raab instead pointed to a resolution passed by the UN Human Rights Council supported by 27
other countries condemning China, saying it was a foretaste of the alliance he was seeking to
build.

He said he was hopeful that other countries in south-east Asia would also offer asylum to Hong
Kong citizens wanting to leave.

Riot police fire tear gas to disperse anti-national security law


protesters. Photograph: Tyrone Siu/Reuters

The shadow foreign secretary, Lisa Nandy, welcomed the citizenship offer but pressed Raab to
urge UK businesses in Hong Kong such as Standard Chartered not to be complicit in the
repression. She also urged the government to ensure that the BN(O) offer did not become
available only to the wealthy. BN(O) status is only available to those born before 1997, omitting
many younger protesters.

Nandy also called for an inquiry into the role of the Chinese mobile phone technology firm
Huawei in the UK’s 5G network and in nuclear power. She said she feared the Treasury still
regarded Chinese investment as “a central plank of the UK recovery and the government
approach remains deeply confused”.
Raab said it was a sobering day for Hong Kong, and pointed to signs that protesters were being
arrested or threatened with arrest under the new legislation.

He then detailed his analysis of how the legislation breached both the Basic Law and the joint
declaration.

He pointed out: “The imposition of this legislation by the government in Beijing, rather than it
being left to Hong Kong’s own institutions, was in direct conflict with article 23 of China’s own
Basic Law for Hong Kong … which affirms that Hong Kong should bring forward national
security legislation on its own.”

The Basic Law, he said, “only allows Beijing to directly impose laws in a very limited number of
cases, such as for the purposes of defence and foreign affairs, or in exceptional circumstances
in which the National People’s Congress declares a state of war or a state of emergency”.

“None of those exceptions apply here.
 Nor has the National People’s Congress sought to
justify this law on any such basis.”

He added that the legislation “contains a slew of measures that directly threaten the freedoms
and rights protected by the joint declaration”, including the “potentially wide-ranging ability
of the mainland authorities to take jurisdiction over certain cases, without any independent
oversight, and to try those cases in the Chinese courts”.

Raab said the measures “represent a flagrant assault on freedom of speech and freedom of
assembly”. He highlighted extraterritorial clauses in the law that implied words spoken in the
UK might be cause for arrest in Hong Kong.

The laws gave Hong Kong’s chief executive, rather than the chief justice, the power to appoint
judges to hear national security cases – “a move that clearly risks undermining the
independence of Hong Kong’s judiciary”.

He also condemned the establishment of a new Office for Safeguarding National Security in
Hong Kong run by the mainland authorities.

The office has wide-ranging powers directly intruding on the responsibility of the Hong Kong
authorities to maintain public order.

He said “China has broken its promise to the people of Hong Kong under its own laws. 
China
has breached its international obligations to the United Kingdom under the joint declaration.

”


Taking a restrained tone that may frustrate some backbenchers, he stressed: “We want a
positive relationship with China. We recognise its growth, its stature and the powerful role it
can play.”


He added: “It is precisely because we respect China as a leading member of the international
community that we expect the Chinese government to meet its international obligations, and
live up to its international responsibilities.”

Hong Kong’s autonomy was guaranteed under the “one country, two systems” agreement
enshrined in the 1984 joint declaration signed by the then Chinese premier, Zhao Ziyang, and
British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher.

The Foreign Office said: “There are 349,881 holders of BN(O) passports and the government
estimates there are around 2.9m BN(O)s currently in Hong Kong. The scheme is for eligible
BN(O) status holders and their immediate family dependants.”

Since you're here ...


… we have a small favour to ask. You've read 610 articles What's this? We would like to
remind you how many Guardian articles you've enjoyed on this device. Can we continue
showing you this? Yes, that's OK No, opt me out Please note you cannot undo this action or opt
back in in the last nine months. And you’re not alone; millions are flocking to the Guardian for
quality news every day. We believe everyone deserves access to factual information, and
analysis that has authority and integrity. That’s why, unlike many others, we made a choice: to
keep Guardian reporting open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to
pay.

As an open, independent news organisation we investigate, interrogate and expose the actions
of those in power, without fear. With no shareholders or billionaire owner, our journalism is
free from political and commercial bias – this makes us different. We can give a voice to the
oppressed and neglected, and stand in solidarity with those who are calling for a fairer future.
With your help we can make a difference.

We’re determined to provide journalism that helps each of us better understand the world, and
take actions that challenge, unite, and inspire change – in times of crisis and beyond. Our work
would not be possible without our readers, who now support our work from 180 countries
around the world.

But news organisations are facing an existential threat. With advertising revenues
plummeting, the Guardian risks losing a major source of its funding. More than ever before,
we’re reliant on financial support from readers to fill the gap. Your support keeps us
independent, open, and means we can maintain our high quality reporting – investigating,
disentangling and interrogating.

Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable for our future. Support the
Guardian from as little as £1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
Support the Guardian

Remind me in September

Remind me in September
Email address

Set my reminder

We will use this to send you a single email in September 2020. To find out what personal data
we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy
We will be in touch to invite you to contribute. Look out for a message in your inbox in
September 2020. If you have any questions about contributing, please contact us here.
Topics
Hong Kong
Foreign policy
China
Asia Pacific
Boris Johnson
news

You might also like