ROSANA, Frances Lorriane B.

BSMA 1-11

Thought Piece on “Vivre sa Vie”

The value of a work of art time and time again is being judged in various ways using
different theories, one of which is through the presence of ‘aura’. According to Benjamin, the
definition of aura is “unique phenomenon of a distance however close it may be” represents
nothing but the formulation of the cult value of the work of art in categories of space and time
perception. A mechanically reproduced art, one which lacks authenticity, lacks aura. A film is an
example of a mechanically reproduced art.

Vivre sa Vie is a French New Wave drama film released in 1962. The New Wave
enabled filmmakers to produced a work of art distinct from the traditional films then dominating
France through its treatment of narrative, visual style, and editing. They used lightweight
cameras that allowed them to shoot in the streets rather than in studios. Films use longer takes
and rapid changes in scenes. They weren’t also strict with the script and encouraged the actors to
improvise their lines. All of these were done to remind the audience that what they are watching
is indeed a film.

One thing is certain; Vivre sa Vie is a film. And if we would criticize is solely using
Benjamin’s theory, this work of art not up to par for it lacks authenticity thus the absence of aura.
The problem with this theory is that it limits art to only those which are authentic and not
reproducible which in modern times is not anymore convenient.

The director of the film, Jean-Luc Godard, used a technique wherein although his work
lacks authenticity, he was able to show the scenes in their genuine and raw form.