Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harvard Business Review: Summary
Harvard Business Review: Summary
Summary:
With the increased focus on supply chain in past few decades, a number of new technologies are
being introduced for improvement of supply chain performance. Despite these technologies
companies has failed to bring a significant improvement. The reason for this can be summed up
into one line by saying that companies are unable to create a fit match between their products
and supply chain which results in issues in predicting product demand. Both functional and
innovative products differ in their supply chain type requirements, as they both varies in demand
patterns, life cycle and lead time. Supply chain basically has two functions, physical (including
all processes from converting raw material into finished good) and second one is mediation
(ensuring product and what customer wants to buy matches). Functional products have to
manage only physical function and its cost as due to predictable demand of these products
mediation function is easy. While for innovative product dealing with both the functions and
their cost is essential. For supply chains dealing with innovative products, focus is not on lower
cost but on supplier speed, flexibility and positioning of inventory with the help of accurate
information from marketplace to supply chain. Supply chains with functional products are
of product and then type of supply chain whether to be efficient or responsive and then jump
towards making a strategy. For companies with functional products all is good with efficient
supply chain while innovative products can’t go with it. Not having responsive supply chain will
cost companies, with innovative products, in the form of cost of inventory stock out and excess.
Having a responsive supply chain requires a high investment but this investment is not that
significant than loss that will result in form of stock outs. Many industries in recent era are
jumping into innovative products but biggest mistake that they are making is dealing these
products with a physical efficient supply chain rather than a responsive one. That’s the exact
answer that why companies despite new technologies have failed to improve performance.
Automobile and other gadget industries are biggest example of it. The best solution for this is
that instead of jumping into innovative products without any need a company must prefer to have
a mix of functional and innovative products. Innovative products should be introduced only
price negotiations between manufacturer and retailer. As it is a competitive model and usually
prices are fixed so there is a continuous fight between suppliers and retailers for profit sharing, as
its margin is low. On contrary, biggest challenge to chain with innovative products is to deal with
demand uncertainty. Companies should accept that risk is always associated when profit margins
are high; no matter how much accurate you try to be in forecasting. After accepting the risk, a
company can devise three methods to manage uncertainty. First is to reduce it, but it is only after
accepting the risk that a company would be able to reduce it. Major risk in these supply chains is
shortages or excess due to longer lead times so second method is to avoid risk by increasing
flexibility. After taking appropriate steps both for avoiding and reducing risk third strategy is to
‘hedge’. To keep a buffer stock or excessive inventory will help company to deal with the risk
that is left behind even after all the steps to reduce and avoid that risk.
This article concludes that companies despite putting all their efforts and using
all the latest technologies are lagging behind because they are unable to discriminate between the
natures of their products and hence not choosing a right type of supply chain and strategy for
product.