17072018N29L159GPre Feasibilityreport PDF

Conceptual Development Plan
For The Proposed Facility for Aerospace Engineering &

Technology with Electronics / Avionics Assembly Integration
Testing (AIT)
At
“ BOEING BENGALURU CAMPUS”
Plot Nos. 55-B, 56, 57 and 59, Hi-Tech, Defence & Aerospace
Park (Aerospace Sector) Devanahalli Village, Jala Hobli,
Yelahanka Taluk, Bengaluru (Rural) – 562 110
Submitted By
M/s. Boeing India Pvt Ltd.,
4th Floor, Block- A, Lake View Building,
Bagmane Tech Park, C.V. Raman Nagar,
Bengaluru – 560 093.
Submitted to
STATE LEVEL ENVIRNOMENT IMPACT
ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY (SEIAA), KARNATAKA.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
M/s. Aqua Tech Enviro Engineers,
# 5/76,"Bharathi" 2nd Floor, 4th Main,
Opp- Mahila Mandali School,
N.R.Colony, Basavanagudi,
Bangalore.
Office No. 080-26671479
Mobile No: 9845383067
E Mail ID: aquatechenviro2017@gmail.com

INDEX
SL NO DESCRIPTION
1 APPLICATION IN FORM I
2 APPLICATION IN FORM I A
ANNEXURE TO APPLICATIONS
A COMPREHENSIVE PROJECT REPORT
B WATER REQUIREMENT DETAILS FOR THE PROJECT
C SEWAGE GENERATION, UTILITY OF TREATED SEWAGE & DESIGN

DETAILS OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
D WATER BALANCE CHART
E WATER REQUIREMENT AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL DURING

CONSTRUCTION PHASE
F SOLID WASTE GENERATION & MANAGEMENT DETAILS

(CONSTRUCTION & OPERATION PHASE)
G ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)

FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPANCY PHASES
H RAIN WATER MANAGEMENT SCHEME
I DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
J EMP FOR CONTROL OF DUST AND NOISE DURING

CONSTRUCTION PHASE.
K RISK ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT PLAN
L GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
M TRAFFIC SURVEY AND ITS MANAGEMENT
N SAVINGS IN ELECTRICAL POWER CONSUMPTION
0 PROJECT RELATED DRAWINGS/PLANS

APPENDIX I
(See paragraph – 6)
FORM 1
(I) Basic Information
1 Name of the Project Facility for Aerospace Engineering &
Technology with Electronics / Avionics
Assembly Integration Testing (AIT)
2 Sl. No. in the schedule Serial No. 8 (a) of schedule
3 Proposed capacity/area/ “ BOEING BENGALURU CAMPUS”
length/tonnage to be handles/command Built up area: 79,294 sq m
area/lease area/number of wells to be Plot area: 1,73,238.14 sqm m (42.81 Acres)
drilled Cost: Rs. 957.00 Crores
4 New / Expansion / Modernization New project
5 Existing capacity / Area etc., NA
6 Category of project i.e., `A` or `B` B
7 Does it attract the general condition? If NO
yes, please specify.
8 Does it attract the specific condition? If NO
yes, please specify.
9 Location “ BOEING BENGALURU CAMPUS”
Plot No. Plot Nos. 55-B, 56, 57 and 59,
Village Defence & Aerospace Park (Aerospace
Sector) Devanahalli Village, Jala Hobli,
Taluk Yelahanka Taluk
District Bengaluru (Rural) – 562 110
State Karnataka
10 Nearest railway station/airport along with Devanahalli Railway station and
distance in Kms. Kempegowda International Airport Limited
at about 7.76 Kms & 2.0 Kms respectively
11 Nearest Town, City, District Nearest town
Headquarters along with distance in Kms. City & District – Bangalore
12 Village Panchayats, Zilla Parishad, -
Municipal Corporation, Local body
(Complete postal addresses with
telephone nos. to be given)
13 Name of the applicant Mr. George John
14 Registered address BOEING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,
Bengaluru – 560 093
1
15 Address for correspondence: As above
Name Mr. George John
Designation (Owner/Partner/CEO) Regional Facilities Planner
Address BOEING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,
Pin Code Bangalore – 560 093.
E – mail George.john@boeing.com
archana@grcindia.net@
Telephone No. + 91 80 6148 1277
Fax No. +91 80 6148 1300
16 Details of alternative Sites examined, if Village – District – State
any. Location of these sites would be 1.
shown on a topo sheet. 2.
No alternative sites are examined.
17 Interlined Projects NA
18 Whether separate application of NA
interlinked project has been submitted?
19 If yes, date of submission NA
20 If no, reason Proposed project is Facility for Aerospace
Engineering & Technology with Electronics
/ Avionics Assembly Integration Testing
(AIT)
21 Whether the proposal involves
approval/clearance under: if yes, details of
the same and their status to be given
a) The Forest (Conservation) Act 1980?
b) The wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972? NO
c) The C R Z Notification, 1991? NO
NO
22 Whether there is any Government None
Order/Policy relevant/relating to the site?
23 Forest land involved (Hectares) None
24 Whether there is any litigation pending
against the project and/or land in which
the project is propose to be set up?
a) Name of the court None
b) Case No.
c) Orders/directions of the court, if
any and its relevance with the
proposed project.
Screening Category: The proposed project is under Item 8 B Category as per amended EIA
notification September 14th 2006.
2
 Capacity corresponding to sectoral activity (such as production capacity for manufacturing, mining
lease area and production capacity for mineral production, area for mineral exploration, length for
linear transport infrastructure, generation capacity for power generation etc.,)
(ii) Activity:
1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions,
which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in
water bodies, etc.,)
Sl. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

No. /No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with
source of information data
1.1 Permanent or temporary change in land Yes The project is designed in concurrence
use, land cover or topography including with the KIADB and therefore there will
increase in intensity of land use (with not be any permanent or temporary
respect to local land use plan) changes in land use, though the proposed
project is likely to increase the intensity
of land use.
1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation No The project site has about few existing
and buildings? trees on the periphery and will be
retained.
1.3 Creation of new land uses? No Creation of new land uses from the
proposed project is not expected as the
intended use of the plot is for the Facility
for Aerospace Engineering & Technology
with Electronics / Avionics Assembly
Integration Testing (AIT).
1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore Yes Geotechnical investigation report is
houses, soil testing? enclosed as Annexure – L.
1.5 Construction works? Yes The proposed project mainly involves
construction activities. These activities
are likely to have certain impact on the
surrounding environment in respect of
Air, Water, Land etc.,
The associated impact of construction

activity on the above environmental
attributes and the mitigation measures
adopted in the project is appended as
Annexure – G.
1.6 Demolition works? No There is no demolition work involved in
the proposed project site.
3
1.7 Temporary sites used for construction Yes About 500 construction workers will be
works or housing of construction engaged for construction activities.
workers?
(Details of labour camps, Number of 25 Toilets will be provided for
labours, Number of toilets, Bath rooms, construction workers.
Medical facilities for labours, safety
measures for labours, Nursery for Construction workers will be
labours children) transported through buses (if required)
from the nearby village.
Drinking water supply and adequate

storage facility will be provided for
construction workers.
The workers will be provided with first

aid facilities apart from personal
protective gadgets.
Periodic health assessment camps and

administration of medicines as and when
required will be provided.
1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or Yes Lower ground and above ground
earthworks including linear structures, structures are proposed.
cut and fill or excavations (Calculation
for earth work estimation) The proposed project involves
Construction of Facility for Aerospace
Engineering & Technology with
Electronics / Avionics Assembly
Integration Testing (AIT).
Activity, Area statement and Building

Configuration details of the project is
detailed in the Comprehensive project
report appended as Annexure - A.
The total quantity of excavated soil is

about 50,000 cum. All excavated soil will
be used for landscape development and
for backfilling within the project site.
1.9 Underground works including mining or No NA
tunneling?
1.10 Reclamation works? No NA
1.11 Dredging? No NA
1.12 Offshore structures? No NA
4
1.13 Production and manufacturing No NA
processes?
1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or Yes Temporary sheds will be constructed for
materials? storage of construction materials.
1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of Yes Liquid waste: The liquid waste from
solid waste or liquid effluents? workers camps will be treated in package
STP and treated water will be used for
dust suppression.
Water requirement for the Construction

phase is appended as Annexure - E.
Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) of capacity

115 KLD will be constructed to treat the
wastewater generated from the project
during occupancy phase.
Quantity of wastewater generation and

design details of STP is appended as
Annexure – C.
Solid Waste:
Construction Phase:
The solid Wastes generated will be
collected, segregated, composted in
compost pits and the product will be
used as manure for landscape
development.
Solid waste like construction debris

generated during construction phase of
about 400 cum will be used for
preparation of sub grades for Roads,
pavements and pathways.
Occupancy Phase:
Collection and segregation at the source
of generation and Organic waste will be
treated in Organic Converter and the
Inorganic waste will be sent for recycling.
5
The solid waste generation detail is
appended as Annexure – F.
1.16 Facilities for long term housing of Yes No long term housing plan for the
operational workers? operational worker is planned in the
proposed project as the local population
residing in the surrounding areas of the
project site will find the employment
opportunity for various maintenance
needs of the project once it is occupied.
1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during No NA
construction or operation?
1.18 New road, rail, air waterborne or other No NA
transport infrastructure including new
or altered routes and stations, ports,
airports etc?
1.19 Closure or diversion of existing No NA
transport routes or infrastructure
leading to changes in traffic movements?
1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or No NA
pipelines?
1.21 Impoundment, damming, culver ting, No NA
realignment or other changes to the
hydrology of watercourses or aquifers?
1.22 Stream crossings? No NA
1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water form Yes The water supply for the project is from
ground or surface waters? Burwell Sources.
1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land No NA
surface affecting drainage or run-off?
1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for Yes Transport facilities will be provided.
construction, operation or
decommissioning? The impacts due to the movement of
vehicle both during construction and
occupancy phase is detailed in the Traffic
Management studies appended as
Annexure – M.
1.26 Long-term dismantling or No NA
decommissioning or restoration works?
1.27 Ongoing activity during No NA
decommissioning which could have an
impact on the environment?
1.28 Influx of people to an area in either Yes There will be Influx of population during
temporarily or permanently? the construction and occupancy phase as
detailed under.
6
Temporarily during construction phase
(500 numbers) and permanent during
occupancy phase (2500 numbers) are
expected.
1.29 Introduction of alien species? No NA
1.30 Loss of native species or genetic No NA
diversity?
1.31 Any other actions? No NA
2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water,
materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply):
Sl.No Information/checklist confirmation Yes/ Details thereof (with approximate

No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with
2.1 Land especially undeveloped or Yes The proposed project site is an Industrial
agricultural land (Acres) land in KIADB Industrial Park. The net site
area is 42.81 Acres.
2.2 Water (expected source & Yes The water for the proposed project will be
competing users) unit: KLD from Bore well Sources.
Total water requirement is about 125KLD
2.3 Minerals (MT) No NA
2.4 Construction material – stone, Yes Description Unit Quantity

aggregates, sand / soil (expected Concrete Cum 55800
source – MT) Steel MT 3500
Tiles sq m 10,000
Granite/Marble sq m 9,500
Glass sq m 8,500
2.5 Forests and timber (source– MT) Yes Procured through local timber depots.
2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels Yes Power Requirement:

(source, competing users) Unit: fuel
(MT), energy (MW) Construction phase:
Temporary power from BESCOM to
operate construction machinery.
One DG Set of 125 kVA capacity is
proposed to serve as back up power
supply during power failure.
Occupancy phase:
7
Anticipated power requirement from
BESCOM is 5319 KW.
8 X 2250 kVA capacity DG sets is
proposed, which will serve as back up
power supply during power failure.
Fuel Requirement: Construction phase:
Low Sulphur content Diesel consumption is
25 L/hr for DG set of 50 kVA capacity.
Occupancy phase: Low Sulphur content

Diesel of 450 L/hr for each DG set.
2.7 Any other natural resources (use No NA

appropriate standard units)
2. Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be

harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks
to human health.
Sl.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

/No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with
3.1 Use of substances or materials, which No NA
are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules)
to human health or the environment
(flora, fauna, and water supplies)
3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or No NA
affect disease vectors (e.g. insect or
water borne diseases)
3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by Yes The implementation of the proposed
changing living conditions? project is beneficial both socially and
economically to its local populace, as it
creates both long term and short term
employment opportunities.
3.4 Vulnerable groups of people who No NA
could be affected by the project e.g.
hospital patients, children, the elderly
etc.,
3.5 Any other causes No NA
8
4. Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or Decommissioning
(MT/Month)
No /No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with
4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes No NA
4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or Yes The quantity of solid waste generation
commercial wastes) and its management during Construction
and Occupancy phase is appended as
Annexure – F.
4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Yes Spent oil from DG sets category 5.1.
Waste Management Rules) About 250-300 L/Annum of spent oil is
generated which is sent to authorized
spent oil reprocessor with manifest as per
notification of Hazardous Waste
(Management and Handling Rules).
4.4 Other industrial process wastes No NA
4.5 Surplus product No NA
4.6 Sewage sludge or other sludge from No The secondary dewatered STP sludge is
effluent treatment 42 kg/day and is taken from Plate and
Frame Filter Press and used as manure.
4.7 Construction or demolition wastes Yes There is no demolition work involved in
the proposed project and all efforts will
be made to reduce construction waste by
adopting modern construction practices
such as proportioning and weigh batchers
for concreting.
Construction debris of about 400 cum is

generated which will be used as
preparatory materials for road, pavement
and sub grade formation within the
project site.
4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment No NA
4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials Yes Measures adopted to control soil
contamination.
1. Providing collection trays to collect oil
dripping from construction machineries if
any.
2. Prevention of spillage and leakage of
oils if required.
3. Providing kerb stones, lined gutter and
oil traps.
9
4.10 Agricultural wastes No NA
4.11 Other solid wastes No NA
5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air (Kg/hr)
Sl.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil Yes Fume hoods is the source of emission
fuels from stationary or mobile from the project other than from
sources stationary sources like DG sets to be
installed during occupancy period.
5.2 Emissions from production processes No NA
5.3 Emissions from materials handling Yes Fugitive dust due to movements of
including storage or transport vehicles carrying construction materials.
Proposed measures for control of dust
and noise during construction phase is
appended as Annexure - J.
5.4 Emissions from construction activities Yes Fugitive dust during earthwork,
including plant and equipment concreting, construction material handling.
Closed operations for mixing of
construction materials will be followed.
5.5 Dust or odours from handling of Yes Fugitive dust due to handling of
materials including construction construction materials.
materials, sewage and waste
Emission of fugitive dust will be controlled
by sprinkling of water and barricading will
be provided all around the project site.
Details of control of Dust and Noise

during construction phase is appended as
Annexure – J.
5.6 Emissions from incineration of waste No NA
5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in No NA
open air (e.g. slash materials,
construction debris)
5.8 Emissions from any other sources No NA
10
6. Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat:
Sl. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/ Details thereof (with approximate

No. No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with
source of information data with source of
information data
6.1 From operation of equipment e.g., Yes Operation of DG set during occupancy
engines, ventilation plant, crushers phase.
Appropriate and adequate noise control
measures will be adopted to control
noise.
DG Sets are set-up in room with acoustic
enclosures.
6.2 From industrial or similar processes No NA
6.3 From construction or demolition No Noise generation due to construction

activities will be negligible and barricades
will be erected all round the site. Details
of control of Noise during construction
phase are appended as Annexure – J.
However there is certain increase in
ambient noise level during construction
activities which will be reduced by under
taking periodic preventive maintenance of
construction materials and restricting and
reducing the speed of vehicle operated for
the movements of construction materials.
All appropriate measure as detailed for
6.1 above is applicable.
6.4 From blasting or piling No NA
6.5 From construction or operational Yes Construction phase: Vehicles carrying
traffic construction materials
Occupancy phase: Vehicular movement by

the occupants.
The details of mitigation measure planned

to reduce the noise level is appended as
Annexure - G.
6.6 From lighting or cooling systems No NA
6.7 From any other sources No NA
11
7.Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into
sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea:

No.
7.1 From handling, storage, use or Yes Appropriate management measures to
spillage of hazardous materials prevent contamination of land, water are
detailed in Annexure - G under water and
land environment.
Disaster management plan for Pre

construction phase is appended as Annexure
–I
7.2 From discharge of sewage or other Yes The total quantity of wastewater generated
effluents to water or the land from the proposed project is about 112.5
(expected mode and place of KLD
discharge)
The treated sewage from the project will be
used for landscape development and toilet
flushing. Water Balance Chart is appended
as Annexure – D.
7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted No NA
to air into the land or into water
7.4 From any other sources No NA
7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up No NA

of pollutants in the environment
from these sources?
8. Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect
human health or the environment
Sl.N Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

o. /No quantities/rates, wherever possible)
with source of information data
8.1 From explosions, spillages, fires etc from No NA
storage, handling, use or production of
hazardous substances
8.2 From any other causes No No major risk from the project is
anticipated. Risk Assessment &
Management Plan for the project is
appended as Annexure – K
12
8.3 Could the project be affected by natural No NA
disasters causing environmental damage
(e.g. Floods, earthquakes, landslides,
cloudburst etc)?
9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could

lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing
or planned activities in the locality.

No /No quantities/rates, wherever possible)
with source of information data
L9.1 Lead to development of supporting. Yes Net Positive Impact in terms of overall
Utilities ancillary development or development of the Area is expected
development stimulated by the project from the project.
which could have impact on the
environment e.g.:
• Supporting infrastructure (roads, Yes Direct & Indirect Employment

power supply, waste or wastewater opportunities are also created due to
treatment, etc.) development of this project.
New business opportunities are

expected to cater the daily needs of
the project.
• housing development Yes Construction of Facility for Aerospace

Engineering & Technology with Electronics
• extractive industries No / Avionics Assembly Integration Testing
(AIT)
• supply industries No
• other No
9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which No NA

could have an impact on the
environment
9.3 Set a precedent for later developments Yes The project development is likely to set
precedence to other likely
developments in the surrounding area.
9.4 Have cumulative effects due to No NA
proximity to other existing or planned
projects with similar effects
13
(II) Environmental Sensitivity:
Sl. Areas Name/ Aerial distance (within 15 km.)
No. Identity Proposed project location
boundary
1 Areas protected under international No NA
conventions, national or local legislation for
their ecological, landscape, cultural or other
related value
2 Areas which are important or sensitive for Yes Bettakote lake at 3.0 Km
ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses (North), Bandikodegehalli
other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, Amanikere at 3.18 Km
mountains, forests. (West).
3 Areas used by protected, important or No NA
sensitive species of flora or fauna for
breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over
wintering, migration
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground No NA
waters
5 State, National boundaries No NA
6 Routes or facilities used by the public for No NA
access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim
areas
7 Defense installations No NA
8 Densely populated or built-up area No NA
9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land No NA
uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship,
community facilities)
10 Areas containing important, high quality or No NA
scarce resources(ground water resources,
surface resources, forestry, agriculture,
fisheries, tourism, minerals)
11 Areas already subjected to pollution or No NA
environmental damage. (those where existing
legal environmental standards are
exceeded)
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which No NA
could cause the project to present
environmental problem (earthquakes,
subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding or
extreme or adverse climatic conditions)
14
APPENDIX II
(See paragraph 6)
FORM-1 A
(Only for construction projects listed under item 8 of the Schedule)
CHECK LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Project proponents are required to provide full information and wherever necessary attach
explanatory notes with the Form and submit along with proposed environmental
management plan & monitoring program)
1. LAND ENVIRONMENT
(Attach panoramic view of the project site and the vicinity)

1.1 Will the existing land use get significantly The existing land use does not get
altered from the project that is not altered significantly as the surrounding
consistent with the surroundings? (Proposed lands are the part of KIADB Industrial
land use must conform to the approved area.
Master Plan / Development Plan of the area. Surrounding Features:
Change of land use if any and the statutory
approval from the competent authority be Google, Location map of the project site
submitted) is enclosed as Annexure - O.
Attach Maps of  Land Availability & Land use Pattern:
The plot area of the project is
(i) site location (Google Image 1,73,238.14 sqm m (42.81 Acres)
showing the project site location with
surrounding details is enclosed)  Land Use Pattern: The Project site is
(ii) surrounding features of the in KIADB Industrial area with rural
proposed site (within 500 settings and surrounded by areas like
meters) Devanahalli, Dummanur,
Kavadedasarahalli, betta kote etc.,
(iii) The site (indicating levels &
contours) to appropriate scales. If not  Transportation: Project site is
available attach only conceptual plans. located Off NH - 7 (Bangalore
Hyderabad Highway) at a distance of
about 6.63 on North direction.
 Agricultural Land: Nearby areas /

villages around the project have few
plantations and agricultural lands.
The site is surrounded by areas like
like Devanahalli, Dummanur,
15
 Forest: Bannerughatta National Park
is at a distance of about 45.28 Km
(South) from site.
 Water Bodies: Bettakote lake at 3.0

Km (North), Bandikodegehalli
Amanikere at 3.18 Km (West).
1.2 List out all the major project requirements
in terms of the
Total Plot Area 1,73,238.14 sqm m (42.81 Acres)
Built up area, 79,294 sq m
Water consumption, 125 KLD
Power requirement, The power required for the proposed

project will be supplied by BESCOM
which is about 5319 KW.
connectivity, community facilities, Project site is located Off NH - 7

(Bangalore Hyderabad Highway) at a
distance of about 6.63 on North
direction.
Parking needs etc., Total parking provided: 479 numbers
Parking details & drawing is appended as
Annexure – O
1.3 What are the likely impacts of the proposed No ecological disturbance is anticipated.
activity on the existing facilities adjacent to
the proposed site?
(Such as open spaces, community facilities,
details of the existing land use, disturbance
to the local ecology).
1.4 Will there be any significant land disturbance Geotechnical Investigation report of the
resulting in erosion, subsidence & instability? project site is enclosed as Annexure – L.
(Details of soil type, slope analysis,
vulnerability to subsidence, seismicity etc.,
may be given).
16
1.5 Will the proposal involve alteration of No
natural drainage systems?
(Give details on a contour map showing the The survey/contour map of the project
natural drainage near the proposed project site is appended as Annexure – O.
site)
1.6 What are the quantities of earthwork The proposed project having one lower
involved in the construction activity-cutting, ground. The total quantity of excavated
filling, reclamation etc. soil is about 50,000 cum. All excavated
soil will be used for landscape
(Give details of the quantities of earthwork development and for backfilling within
involved, transport of fill materials from the project site.
outside the site etc.)
1.7 Give details regarding water supply, waste Sewage generated from construction
handling etc., during the construction period. workers camp will be treated in package
STP.
1.8 Will the low lying areas & wetlands get No
altered?(Provide details of how low lying and
wetlands are getting modified from the
proposed activity)
1.9 Whether construction debris & waste during Construction debris 400 cum will be
construction cause health hazard? used for road formation activities in the
(Give quantities of various types of wastes project site. The details of solid wastes
generated during construction including the generated by the construction workers
construction labour and the means of is appended as Annexure – F.
disposal)
2. WATER ENVIRONMENT:
2.1 Give the total quantity of water requirement for Domestic water requirement is
the proposed project with the breakup of 125 KLD which will be sourced from
requirements for various uses. Bore well Sources.
How will the water requirement met? The details of source of water supply
State the sources & quantities and furnish a and basis of calculations is appended as
water balance statement. Annexure - B.
The water balance chart is appended as
Annexure – D.
2.2 What is the capacity (dependable flow or yield) Details are applicable as above.
of the proposed source of water?
17
2.3 What is the quality of water required, in case, The expected domestic water
the supply is not from a municipal source? requirement is 125 KLD and will be
(Provide physical, chemical, biological augmented through Bore well sources.
characteristics with class of water quality)
2.4 How much of the water requirement can be The proposed project envisages the
met from the recycling of treated wastewater? utility of treated sewage for recycling
purposes by way of using it for flushing
of toilets and gardening.
The total quantity of treated sewage

(Give the details of quantities, sources and available in the project is 112.5 KLD
usage)
Toilet Flushing (Recycled): 55 KLD
Water balance chart Furnished as

Annexure – D
2.5 Will there be diversion of water from other No
users?
(Please assess the impacts of the project on
other existing uses and quantities of
consumption)
2.6 What is the incremental pollution load from The Raw sewage generated from the
wastewater generated from the proposed proposed activity will be treated to
activity? tertiary level and the residual organics
in the treated wastewater will be
practically nil, the treated sewage will
be reused, therefore incremental
pollution load is not anticipated.
Details of wastewater quality and

quantity and design details of STP
(Give details of the quantities and composition
of wastewater generated from the proposed (115 KLD capacity) and flow chart is
appended as Annexure – C.
activity)
2.7 Give details of the water requirements met Rain Water Harvesting Potential from
from water harvesting? Furnish details of the the project : 248 KLD
facilities created. Details furnished as Annexure – H
18
2.8 What would be the impact of the land use Adequate and optimal internal storm
changes occurring due to the proposed project water drains are created to handle the
on the runoff characteristics (quantitative as internal runoff and convey it to
well as qualitative) of the area in the post external drains.
construction phase on a long term basis?
Would it aggravate the problems of flooding or The detailed drawing for internal storm
water logging in any way? water management is appended as
Annexure – O.
2.9 What are the impacts of the proposal on the As the ground water potential is likely
ground water? to increase due to ground water
(Will there be tapping of ground water; give the recharging. The groundwater
details of ground water table, recharging recharging scheme is planned in the
capacity, and approvals obtained from project.
competent authority, if any) Storm water Management drawing is
enclosed as Annexure – O.
2.10 What precautions/measures are taken to Runoff contamination from the
prevent the run-off from construction activities proposed project is reduced by
polluting land & aquifers? providing lined gutter for carrying
(Give details of quantities and the measures runoff from construction areas and
taken to avoid the adverse impacts) Kerb Stones and bunds to prevent
Runoff Contamination.
Preventing the mixing of storm water

runoff and sewage from labour camps.
Use of leak proof containers for
storage of oil to avoid contamination of
runoff.
2.11 How is the storm water from within the site The storm water is channalised
managed? through storm water drains to finally
(State the provisions made to avoid flooding of join ground water recharge pits and
the area, details of the drainage facilities the excess Storm Water free from
provided along with a site layout indication runoff Contamination will be let to
contour levels) External Drains.
2.12 Will the deployment of construction laborers Sewage generated from the
particularly in the peak period lead to unsanitary construction workers camp will be
conditions around the project site (Justify with treated in Package STP and the treated
proper explanation) water will be reused for dust
suppression.
19
2.13 What on-site facilities are provided for the Sewage Treatment Plant is proposed
collection, treatment & safe disposal of sewage? for treatment of domestic sewage from
(Give details of the quantities of wastewater the project and the quantity of
generation, treatment capacities with wastewater, design details with unit
technology & facilities for recycling and disposal) capacity and technology adopted with
disposal options is appended as
Annexure – C.
2.14 Give details of dual plumbing system if treated Dual piping system is proposed to
waste used is used for flushing of toilets or any reduce the fresh water consumption.
other use.
Dual piping system drawing is

appended as Annexure – O.
3. VEGETATION
3.1 Is there any threat of the project to the No
biodiversity?
(Give a description of the local ecosystem with
it’s unique features, if any)
3.2 Will the construction involve extensive clearing As per the topographical survey plan
or modification of vegetation? enclosed.
(Provide a detailed account of the trees &
vegetation affected by the project)
3.3 What are the measures proposed to be taken An area of about 63,379.09 sq m is left
to minimize the likely impacts on important site for development of landscape.
features
The Ground Coverage area is about
(Give details of proposal for tree plantation, 23,169.75 sq m
landscaping, creation of water bodies etc along
with a layout plan to an appropriate scale) The Paved area is 25,984.21sq m
The Land use pattern scheme of the

proposed project is detailed in the
Comprehensive Project report
appended as Annexure – A
Drawing showing the details of
Landscaping and other features is
appended as Annexure – O
20
4. FAUNA
4.1 Is there likely to be any displacement of fauna- No
both terrestrial and aquatic or creation of
barriers for their movement? Provide the
details.
4.2 Any direct or indirect impacts on the avifauna of No
the area? Provide details.
4.3 Prescribe measures such as corridors, fish No
ladders etc to mitigate adverse impacts on fauna
5. AIR ENVIRONMENT
5.1 Will the project increase atmospheric DG sets and fume hoods are the air
concentration of gases & result in heat islands? pollution source of the project.
(Give details of background air quality levels
with predicted values based on dispersion The DG sets will be provided with
models taking into account the increased traffic adequate stack height to disperse the
generation as a result of the proposed emissions into the atmosphere. The
constructions) scrubber will be provided for fume
hoods.
5.2 What are the impacts on generation of dust, NA
smoke, odorous fumes or other hazardous
gases? Give details in relation to all the
meteorological parameters.
5.3 Will the proposal create shortage of parking Adequate parking facilities are
space for vehicles? Furnish details of the present proposed to be provided as per the
level of transport infrastructure and measures local building by law.
proposed for improvement including the traffic The parking plan showing the entry &
management at the entry & exit to the project exit to the project site with traffic
site. management is enclosed as Annexure -
O.
Traffic management study and
measures is appended as
Annexure – M.
5.4 Provide details of the movement patterns with Site plan with roads, pedestrian
internal roads, bicycle tracks, pedestrian pathways and paved areas of the
pathways, footpaths etc., with areas under each project is enclosed as Annexure – O
category.
21
5.5 Will there be significant increase in traffic noise Details of noise mitigation measure
& vibrations? Give details of the sources and the proposed is appended as
measures proposed for mitigation of the above. Annexure – G
5.6 What will be the impact of DG sets & other The DG sets will be provided with
equipment on noise levels & vibration in & acoustic enclosures to reduce the
ambient air quality around the project site? noise level < 55 dB
Provide details.
6. AESTHETICS:
6.1 Will the proposed constructions in any way NA

result in the obstruction of a view, scenic
amenity or landscapes?
Are these considerations taken into account

by the proponents?
6.2 Will there be any adverse impacts from new The project is in the industrial area of
constructions on the existing structures?
KIADB and surrounded by areas like
What are the considerations taken into
account? Devanahalli, Dummanur,
6.3 Whether there are any local considerations of The local byelaw of KIADB is
urban form & urban design influencing the considered in designing the project.
design criteria? They may be explicitly spelt
out.
6.4 Are there any anthropological or No
archaeological sites or artifacts nearby? State if
any other significant features in the vicinity of
the proposed site have been considered.
7. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS
7.1 Will the proposal result in any changes to the Once the project is completed
demographic structure of local population? approximately about 2500 people are
Provide the details. expected in the building.
7.2 Give details of the existing social infrastructure Surrounded by industries and vacant
around the proposed project. plots.
7.3 Will the project cause adverse effects on local NA
communities, disturbance to sacred sites or
other cultural values? What are the safeguards
proposed?
22
8. BUILDING MATERIALS
8.1 May involve the use of building materials with The proposed project construction
high-embodied energy. materials are selected to conform the
Are the construction materials produced with building energy efficiency norms and
energy efficient processes? as well as Energy Conservation
Building Code Guidelines
(Give details of energy conservation measures in
the selection of building materials and their The following measures are taken to
energy efficiency) for conserving the energy
1. Solar powered street lighting
for common areas.
2. CFL bulbs, lights and fixtures
for common areas
3. Proper sizing of cables with
less voltage drop so that losses in
cables can be minimized
4. Optimal pumping of water
using water level controllers,
switching on/off of street lights with
photo cell /time switch.
5. Procuring graded electrical
appliances which helps in high energy
conservations.
6. Timer control for external lighting
7. LED type street lighting fixtures
instead of high power sodium vapor
light fixture.
8.2 Transport and handling of materials during Details appended as Annexure – G
construction may result in pollution, noise &
public nuisance. What measures are taken to
minimize the impacts?
8.3 Are recycled materials used in roads and The construction waste and debris
structures? (400 cum) from the project will be
State the extent of savings achieved? used in road and pavement formation
8.4 Give details of the methods of collection, The solid Wastes generated are
segregation & disposal of the garbage generated segregated at its point of generation,
during the operation phases of the project. collected and stored at a common
designated place and Organic solid
waste will be treated in an organic
converter and product will be used as
manure for Landscape or used as fuel.
23
The inorganic solid waste is proposed
to be recycled.
The details of quantity of solid waste

generated is appended as
Annexure – F
9. ENERGY CONSERVATION
9.1 Give details of the power requirements, source The power required for the project is
of supply, backup source etc. about 5319 KW and will supply from
BESCOM.
What is the energy consumption assumed per Yes, Energy conservation methods
square foot of built-up area? are adopted. Non Conventional
Sources of Energy with Solar Street
How have you tried to minimize energy Lighting.
consumption
9.2 What type of, and capacity of, power back-up The proposed project will be provide
to you plan to provide? with 8 X 2250 kVA capacity DG sets
to serve as alternative source of
power supply in case of break down
of power from BESCOM.
Occupancy phase: Low Sulphur
content Diesel consumption of 450
L/hr for each DG set.
9.3 What are the characteristics of the glass you Low emission and low solar heat gain
plan to use? Single glazed with aluminum frame are
proposed to be used for windows
etc.,
Provide specifications of its characteristics 2 0 2 0
related to both short wave and long wave U = 5.7 W/m C < 6.922W/m C
radiation? SHGC = 0.4
9.4 What passive solar architectural features are Passive solar architectural features
being used in the building? are considered while designing the
Illustrate the applications made in the proposed buildings in respect of orientation of
project. building thermal insulation aspects for
wall with fenestration & roof is
considered as per ECBC 2007
Guidelines viz., Balconies, Projections,
Recessed window etc.,
24
9.5 Does the layout of streets & buildings maximize Yes
the potential for solar energy devices? Have Solar panels for Street lighting are
you considered the use of street lighting, proposed to be adopted.
emergency lighting and solar hot water systems
for use in the building complex? Substantiate Terrace floor plan with solar panel
with details. nos. capacity details is appended as
Annexure – O.
9.6 Is shading effectively used to reduce As per ECBC Guidelines the thermal
cooling/heating loads? What principles have transmittance (U) value = 0.409
been used to maximize the shading of Walls on W/m2-0C for roofs
the East and the West and the Roof? How
much energy saving has been effected?
9.7 Do the structures use energy-efficient space Yes, Passive solar architectural
conditioning, lighting and mechanical systems? features are considered while
Provide technical details. designing the project in respect of
orientation of building with natural
light and ventilation
Provide details of the transformers and motor
efficiencies, lighting intensity and air- The Low loss energy efficient
conditioning load assumptions? transformers, CFL’s, Ballasts, variable
frequency drives for motors for low
power consumption are proposed.
Variable frequency drive is used for
Are you using CFC and HCFC free chillers? motor and pumps in order to reduce
Provide specifications. the energy consumption.
9.8 What are the likely effects of the building None
activity in altering the micro-climates?
Provide a self assessment on the likely impacts
of the proposed construction on creation of
heat island & inversion effects? None
9.9 What are the thermal characteristics of the For Roof

building envelope? (a) roof; (b) external walls; U – 0.34 W/m2-0C < 0.409 W/m2-0C
and (c) fenestration? For Walls:
Give details of the material used and the U- U-Value = 0.42 W/m2 0C < 0.431 W
values or the R values of the individual /m2 0C
components. For Vertical Fenestration
U-Value = 5.7 W /m2 0C < 6.922
W/m2 0C and Max. SHGC : 0.40
25
9.10 What precautions & safety measures are The building is designed in compliance
proposed against fire hazards? Furnish details of with fire and safety norms and the
emergency plans. NOC is obtained from Fire Fighting
Department. Static Fire water tank as
per the regulations is proposed, Wet
risers and sprinklers provided as per
the Fire Fighting Norms.
9.11 If you are using glass as wall material provides Low E glasses are considered and as
details and specifications including emissive and per the details furnished above.
thermal characteristics.
9.12 What is the rate of air infiltration into the NA
building? Provide details of how you are
mitigating the effects of infiltration.
9.13 To what extent the non-conventional energy Solar Street lighting system are
technologies are utilized in the overall energy proposed.
consumption?
Provide details of the renewable energy
technologies used.
10. Environment Management Plan:
10.1 The Environment Management Plan would Wet risers/down riser, fire alarm
consist of all mitigation measures for each item system, automatic sprinklers system,
wise activity to be undertaken during the and portable fire extinguishers are
construction, operation and the entire life cycle proposed in case of fire accidents.
to minimize adverse environmental impacts as a
result of the activities of the project. It would Details of mitigation measures to
also delineate the environmental monitoring minimize adverse environmental
plan for compliance of various environmental impacts during construction and
regulations. It will state the steps to be taken in operation phase of the project is
case of emergency such as accidents at the site appended in Environmental
including fire. Monitoring plan is enclosed as
Annexure – G.
26
“I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures
are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I am aware that if any part of the data and
information submitted is found to be false or misleading at any stage, the Project will be rejected
and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost.
Date: 13.07.2018
Place: Bangalore
George John,
Regional Facilities Planner
BOEING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,
Signature of the applicant
With Name and Full address
(Project Proponent / Authorized Signatory)
27
Annexure &
Details to Application in
Form 1 and Form 1A
M/s. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd., “ BOEING BANGALORE CAMPUS”
ANNEXURE – A
COMPREHENSIVE PROJECT REPORT
PROJECT AT GLANCE
PROPOSED PROJECT Facility for Aerospace Engineering & Technology with

Electronics / Avionics Assembly Integration Testing
(AIT)
LOCATION
“ BOEING BENGALURU CAMPUS”
Plot Nos. 55-B, 56, 57 and 59, Hi-Tech, Defence &

Aerospace Park (Aerospace Sector) Devanahalli Village,
Jala Hobli, Yelahanka Taluk, Bengaluru (Rural) – 562
110
TOTAL PLOT AREA 1,73,238.14 sqm m (42.81 Acres)
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA 79,294 sq m
TOTAL COST OF PROJECT Rs. 957,00,00,000/-
(Rupees Nine Hundred and Fifty Seven Crores Only)
NO. OF FLOORS PROPOSED The proposed Project consists of 5 Blocks.
 Block B1- Office Block :- Block comprises of

lower ground, ground and 5 upper floors
 Block B2:- Lab/AIT Block:- Ground and Two
upper floors.
 Block B3:- Visitor Centre:- Ground Floor.
 Block B4:- Utility Centre:- Ground Floor
 Block B5:- Canine Block:- Ground Floor.
CAR PARKING DETAILS Total No. of parking space proposed is 479 Cars
WATER SUPPLY The water supply is from Bore well Sources
PROPOSED SANITATION Under Ground Sanitary System Facility for conveying
the wastewater to the Proposed Sewage Treatment
Plant.
28
SOLID WASTE Collection and Segregation at source of generation and

MANAGEMENT the Organic waste will be treated in Organic Converter
and the Inorganic Waste will be sent for recycling.
AIR POLLUTION/ NOISE 8 X 2250 kVA capacity DG sets with acoustics are
GENERATION SOURCE proposed to be provided with adequate stack height.
BACKGROUND OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
M/s. Boeing India Pvt Ltd., 4th Floor, Block- A, Lake View Building, Bagmane Tech Park, C.V.
Raman Nagar, Bengaluru – 560 093 is coming up with proposed Boeing Bengaluru Campus
(BBC) at Plot Nos. 55-B, 56, 57 and 59, Hi-Tech, Defence & Aerospace Park (Aerospace
Sector) Devanahalli Village, Jala Hobli, Yelahanka Taluk, Bengaluru (Rural) – 562 110.
INTRODUCTION ABOUT BOEING IN INDIA
Boeing has been a strong partner of India’s aerospace sector for more than 75 years. India has
been using Boeing products since World War II, when it acquired DC-2 and DC-3 airplanes.
Since then, Boeing has been the mainstay of India’s commercial aviation sector, providing the
country’s airlines with the most fuel-efficient airplanes.
Boeing’s relationship with India on the defense front goes back to the 1940s, when the Indian
Air Force enlisted two Boeing aircraft: the T-6 Texan, or Harvard Advanced Trainer, made by
North American Aviation, and the C-47 Sky train military transport, a military variant of the
DC-3, made by McDonnell Douglas.
Today, Boeing continues to play an important role in the mission readiness and modernization
of India’s defense forces. India has 10 C-17 Globemaster strategic airlifters, eight P-8I maritime
surveillance aircraft (with four more on order), 22 Apache and 15 Chinook helicopters on
order. India has also decided to purchase six AH-64 Apaches for the Indian Army.
Headquartered in Delhi, Boeing’s India operations include field service offices in Mumbai,
Hindan, Rajali and New Delhi, and a Boeing India Engineering & Technology Center (BIETC) in
Bangalore. Boeing India also has a 500 member team based in Chennai which provides technical
content development, software delivery and engineering design services for the aerospace and
defense sector.
Boeing in India has 1,700 employees, and more than 7,000 people who work on dedicated
supply chain jobs with Indian suppliers across manufacturing, engineering and IT sectors. Boeing
continues to increase its footprint as supply chain, sourcing, engineering and hiring activities
continue to grow.
29
Chemicals used in the lab

SNo Type of Chemicals Used Mode of Storage Approxi
mate
Quantity
in units
: Gms
1 Sodium Chloride storage cabinet 500
2 Sodium Sulphate Anhydrous storage cabinet 500
3 Sodium Nitrate storage cabinet 500
4 Potassium Chloride storage cabinet 500
5 Potassium Sulphate storage cabinet 500
6 Potassium Hydroxide Pellets storage cabinet 500
7 Sodium Hydroxide Pellets storage cabinet 500
8 Potassium Nitrate storage cabinet 500
9 Aluminium Sulphate storage cabinet 500
10 Aluminium Chloride Hydrate storage cabinet 500
11 Sodium Carbonate storage cabinet 500
12 Sodium Hydrogen storage cabinet 500
13 Sodium Chromate storage cabinet 500
14 Potassium Dichromate storage cabinet 500
15 Chromium Trioxide storage cabinet 500
16 Chomium Sulphate storage cabinet 500
17 Potassium Permanganate storage cabinet 500
18 Nickel Sulphate Purified storage cabinet 500
19 Cupric Sulphate storage cabinet 500
20 Zinc Sulphate storage cabinet 500
21 Zinc Chloride Powder storage cabinet 500
22 Zinc Oxide storage cabinet 500
23 Ferric Sulphate storage cabinet 500
24 Potassium Hydroxide Pellets storage cabinet 500
25 Calcium Chloride storage cabinet 500
26 Calcium Chloride storage cabinet 500
27 Sodium HydroxideSpecial storage cabinet 500
28 Glycine storage cabinet 500
29 Tartaric Acid Extrapure storage cabinet 500
30 Sodium Oxalate storage cabinet 500
31 Ethylenediamine Tetra Acetic storage cabinet 500
Acid
32 Citric Acid storage cabinet 500
33 Stearic Acid storage cabinet 500
34 Sodium Gluconate storage cabinet 500
35 Ethylene carbonate storage cabinet 500
36 Methacrylic acid storage cabinet 500
30
37 Sodium lauryl sulphate storage cabinet 500

38 Hydroxy quinoline storage cabinet 500
39 Sodium tungstate storage cabinet 500
40 Sulphamic acid storage cabinet 500
41 Chromium chloride storage cabinet 500
42 Growspace 814 spl storage cabinet 5kg
43 Growspace Manganese (II) storage cabinet 1kg
Sulphate
44 Growspace Manganese (II) storage cabinet 1kg
Chloride
Acids : Units : ml
45 Hydrochoric Acid Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
46 Sulphuric Acid Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
47 Nitric Acid Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
48 Hydrofluoric Acid Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
49 Orthophosphoric Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
50 Perchloric Acid Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
51 Hydrogen Peroxide Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
52 Acetic Acid Glacial Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
53 Ammonia Sol Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
54 N-Methyle-2-Pyrrolidone Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
55 Digol Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
56 Acrylic Acid Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
57 Acetone Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
58 Acetic Acid Glacial Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
59 Methanol Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
60 Propane Flammable acid storagecabinet 500
61 Tetrahydrofuran Flammable acid storage cabinet 500
62 Dimethyl Sulphoxide Flammable acid storage cabinet 500
63 N-Dimethylformamide Flammable acid storage cabinet 500
64 Ethyl Acetate Flammable acid storage cabinet 500
65 Aniline Flammable acid storage cabinet 500
66 Triton Flammable acid storage cabinet 500
67 Pyrrole reagent grade Flammable acid storage cabinet 500
68 Propane Flammable acid storage cabinet 2.5 L
69 Growspace Ex 28 Cleaner Flammable acid storage cabinet 5L
31
LAND USE PATTERN FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
Sl. Particulars Area Percentage

No. sq m Acres (%)
1 Total Plot Area 1,73,238.14 42.81 -
2 Area Reserved for future 60,705.09 15 -
development
3 Net plot area 1,12,533.05 27.80 100
4 Ground Coverage Area 23,169.75 5.72 20.58
5 Paved area + roads 25,984.21 6.42 23.09
6 Landscape area 63,379.09 15.66 56.32
AREA STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
Built up area in sq m
Sl. FLOORS Block Block Block Block Block
No. B1- B2:- B3:- B4:- B5:-
Office Lab/AIT Visitor Visitor Canine
Block Block Centre Centre Block
1 LOWER 13,086 - - - -
GROUND
FLOOR
2 GROUND 6,945 9440 241 2179 252
FLOOR
st
3 1 FLOOR 5,534 9754
4 2nd FLOOR 5,298 9753
5 3rd FLOOR 5,447 -
6 4th FLOOR 5,194 -
7 5th FLOOR 5,429 -
8 Terrace Floor 465 276
Total 47,399 29223 241 2179 252
Grand Total 79,294 sq m
32
SUMMARY OF THE BUILT UP AREA

Sl. Space type Total area
No. Sq. Mt.
1 Built-up Area of B1 - Office Block 47,399

2 Built-up Area of B2 - Lab/AIT Block 29,223
3 Built-up Area of B3 -Security 241
4 Built-up Area of B4 -Utility Block 2,179
5 Built-up Area of B4 -Canine Block 252
6 TOTAL BUILTUP AREA 79,294
CAR PARKING STATEMENT:
Parking requirement
Lower ground floor 285
Surface Parking 151
Total car parks required 436
Car parks provided
10 % extra for visitors 43
Total car parks provided 479
AIR POLLUTION SOURCES & ITS MANAGEMENT:
The anticipated power required for the project will be supplied from BESCOM. The primary
sources of air pollution from the establishment are from the operation of diesel generator sets.
The project will be provided with DG set of following capacity and is installed to serve as an
alternative back up source of power supply in the event of breakdown of power supply
BESCOM. The details of capacities & fuel consumption for the DG sets are given below.
33
Air Pollution Sources for the Proposed Project:
Sl. Source of Type Sulfur Consumption Chimney height (in m)

No air of content L/hr T/hr & air pollution control
pollution fuel in in systems provided
case case /proposed
of of
liquid agro
fuel based
fuel
1 D.G. set – 8 Diesel 0.035 450 - Stand alone Stack with
X 2250 L/hr maximum height 33 meters
kVA. from GFL/ as per PCB
requirement
2 Fume hoods -- - -- -- Scrubber with Chimney
of 3 mtrs ARL or 9 mtrs
AGL whichever is higher
NOISE GENERATION SOURCES:
Major noise producing sources of the project is expected to be from DG set, tear-down lab will
have around 125-150 DB noise , Vehicular movements from and to the proposed project. The
DG sets are provided with acoustic enclosures to control the noise levels in such a way that
the noise levels are within the permissible limits specified for ambient noise levels. More over
the DG set is operated only during the emergencies when there is power failure.
34
PROJECTED COST OF THE PROJECT:
The total projected cost of the proposed project is presented as below.
Sl. Particulars Cost in Rupees

No.
1. Land Cost Rs. 88,00,00,000/-
2. Construction Cost Rs.589,00,00,000.00/-
3. Plant and Machinery Rs.280,00,00,000.00/-
TOTAL Rs.957,00,00,000.00/-
Rupees Nine Hundred and Fifty Seven Crores Only
35
ANNEXURE: B
SOURCE OF WATER FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
The most important aspect under the water supply scheme is the selection of source of Water,
which should be reliable and potable. The source of water supply to the proposed project is
through Bore well Sources.
DETAILS OF WATER CONSUMPTION OF THE PROJECT:
Note: As per NBC-2016, water requirement for office buildings mentioned below,
 Total water requirement is 45Lts

 Domestic water requirement is 25Lts
 Flushing water requirement is 20Lts
The water requirement calculation

 Office Block :
 Total number of persons = 1800 persons

 Lab/AIT Block:

 Visitor Centre:

 Utility Building :

 Canine Block:

Total = 2500 persons
36
Total Water requirement:
Total water requirement are mentioned below:
 Total number of persons = 2500 persons
 Water requirement / person /day = 45lts
 Total Water requirement /day = 2500 x 45 = 112500 Lts
 Adding 10% extra for cleaning & wastages = 123750 Lts
Total water requirement = 123750Lts Say = 125 KLD
 Domestic Water requirement / person /day = 25lts
 Domestic water requirement = 2500 x 25 = 62500Lts
 Adding 10% extra for cleaning & wastages = 68750lts, Say 70,000Lts/Day
Required domestic water storage per day = 70,000lts, storage provided = 135000lts
 Flushing Water requirement / person /day = 20lts
 Flushing water requirement = 2500 x 20 = 50000Lts
o Adding 10% extra for cleaning & wastages = 55000lts Say 55,000 Lts/Day
Domestic water Storage is provided for 4.0days requirement in the underground reservoir i.e.
250,000 liters comprising of raw water compartment and Treated water compartment. One
day storage is provided for flushing purposes in Sewage Treatment Plant. Further the sump is
divided into compartments facilitating easy cleaning and maintenance works.
Solar Hot water system:-

Hot water is envisaged from solar hot water system 7000lts /day installed capacity for cafeteria.
37
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM:
The proposed water supply scheme to cater to the public and domestic water requirement of
the proposed project consists of sourcing water to a common collection facility known as the
UG Sump. The source is initially connected to the fire water Sump and overflow of the same is
taken to the raw water sump. The water from the raw water sump is filtered and then taken to
the treated water sump. All the tanks will be constructed in RCC. The water from the treated
water sump will be distributed through Hydro-pneumatic System.
38
ANNEXURE: C
1. SEWAGE GENERATION AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Wastes of different type such as spent water from bath rooms, water closets/pans, house and
street washings, semi liquid waste of human excreta, dry refuse of house and street sweepings,
broken furniture, crockery etc., are produced daily. If proper arrangement for collection
treatment and disposal of all the wastes produced are not made, unsanitary conditions will
develop and it will become impossible for the public to live. Therefore, it is most essential to
collect, treat and dispose all the sanitary waste produced. Generally, it has been observed that
about 70-80 % of the water supplied comes out as sewage. Therefore, the total quantity of
wastewater generated from the proposed Project is worked out as below.
Water required for the project = 125 KLD

Wastewater generation : 125X 0.90 = 112.5 KLD or say 115 KLD
(Assuming 90 % of the water
Supplied comes out as wastewater)
Domestic wastewater generated from the proposed project will be conveyed to Sewage
Treatment Plant of capacity 115 KLD for treatment and disposal and final design proposed
capacity 205 KLD for future expansion.
Note: - Initially it is designed for 115 KLD. Civil infrastructure for STP will be
created for 205 KLD for meet future needs.
TREATED SEWAGE DISPOSAL:
a. Toilet Flushing:
Total contribution population from the proposed project is 4500 Persons.

Toilet flushing water requirement at the rate of 35 LPCD
= 2500 X 20 = 50,000 L/day or say 50 KLD
Adding 10% extra for cleaning & wastages = 55, 000.
b. Gardening:
Treated water used for gardening @ rate of 3 L/ sq m /day
Area available for landscape development: 63,379.09 sq m
Total water used for landscape development is 63,379.09 x3
= 1,90,137.27 L/day
Or say 191 KLD
39
DESIGN DETAILS OF STP AND TREATMENT METHODOLOGY ADOPTED:

The general characteristic of sewage is considered as shown in the table below.
Anticipated effluent parameters before treatment:
PH - 6.5-8.5
BOD5 - 250 - 350 mg/lt
COD - 600-800 mg/lt
SS - 100-200 mg/lt
Oil & Grease - up to 50 mg/lt
Ecoli - 10 MPN
Desired Sewage parameters after treatment:
PH - 6.0-8.5
BOD5 - Less than 10 Mg/L
S. Solids - Less than 10 Mg/L
COD - Less than 100 Mg/L
Oil & Grease - Less than 10 Mg/L
E Coli after treatment - nil
Total quantity of raw effluent = 115m3/day

BOD5 @ 270 C = 250 mg/L
Expected BOD5 reduction:
1. Influent BOD5 = 250 mg/L
2. BOD5 reduction in SBR = 95 %
Therefore BOD5 at the outlet of secondary
Treatment = 12.5 mg/L
3. BOD5 reduction with tertiary treatment like
Coagulation, filtration and disinfection = < 10 mg
3.1 BAR SCREEN:

* Size of the unit : 0.6 m x 1.0 m
* Function : To separate coarse matter
From the raw effluent
40
3.2. RECEIVING TANK:

* Average BOD5 of effluent at the inlet of the pre-aeration tank = 250 mg/L
* Total organic load with 20% BOD5 reduction considered = 50 mg/L
* Total organic load to be removed = 5.75 kg/day
* Total oxygen required assuming 2 kg of O2/kg of BOD5 removed = 11.50kg/day
Let us assume;
* Alpha = 0.6
* Beta = 0.7
* Oxygen transfer at 0.25 m depth = 25%
* Density of air = 1.2 kg/m3
* Percentage of oxygen in atmosphere = 21%
* Therefore air required for aeration = 434.61m 3/day
* Air requirement per hour = 27.16m3/hr
* Type of aeration: coarse bubble diffused aeration system
* Detention time = 8 Hrs
* Volume of the unit = 38.33 Say 40.0 cum required
Provided in the stp = 95.0 cum
* Size of the unit = 10.6mx5.0mx1.80m liquid depth
3.3 SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTOR (2 No.s)

i) BASIC DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS
Inlet Outlet
BOD5 at 270 C, mg/L 200 20
TSS, mg/L 200 30
(NH3 – Ammonia), mg/L 25 1
Total Phosphorous, mg/L 10 2
TKN, mg/L 40 5
41
ii) SBR DESIGN CALCULATIONS

A) REACTOR VOLUME:
Assumptions for SBR kinetics
* F/M ratio = 0.15
* MLSS = 4000 mg/l
* Net sludge yield = 0.76 kg MLSS/kg BOD5
* Min. solids retention time = 8 days
* Reactor volume decanted each day = 60%
* Dissolved O2 liquor concentration = 2 mg/l
* Oxygen coefficient
Kg of O2/kg of BOD5 = 1.28
Kg of O2/kg of NH3N = 4.6
* Oxygen transfer factors;
A (typical for coarse bubble diffusers) = 0.85
ß (typical for domestic wastewater) = 0.95
* Typical O2 transfer rate for coarse bubble diffusers = 1.25 kg O2/KWH
* No. of cycles/day =2
* BOD5 removed (kg/day) = [(BOD influent – BOD effluent) (mg/L)] x flow (L/day)]
BOD5 = 20.70 kg/day
* Required aerobic mass = BOD5 removed

F/M Ratio
= 138kg MLSS
* Reactor volume (low water volume) = MLSS mass (kg) / MLSS concentration
= 34.50m3
* Since the decant volume represents 60% of the total volume
* Total reactor volume required = 86.25 Say 90.0cum
Provided = 155.0 cum
* Size of the unit – 77.50cum = 5.0mx4.0mx4.0m liquid depth of 2 Nos.
42
b) DECANT VOLUME:
* Total decant volume = total reactor volume – reactor
Volume (Low water level)
Total decant volume required = 38.33 Say 40.0cum
Provided = 70.0cum
* Maximum detention time= 8 hrs
* Max. Retention time = 2 hrs
* Size of the unit – 70.0cum = 34.20sqmtx2.0m liquid depth
AERATION:
*Nitrogenous O2 demand (kg of O2/day) = NH3 - N oxidized (kg/day) x kg O2/kg of NH3N
* Carbonaceous O2 demand (kg of O2/day) = BOD5 mass (kg/day) x kg O2/BOD5
* NH3 - N oxidized (kg/day) = TKN removed (kg/day) - synthesis N (kg/day)
* TKN removed = 4.025kg/day

* Synthesis N = 5% waste activated sludge of total daily sludge production
* Sludge production (kg/day) = net sludge yield (kg MLSS/kg BOD 5) x BOD5 removed (kg/day)
Therefore sludge production = 0.76 x 20.70 kg/day
= 15.732kg/day
* Synthesis N = 0.7866kg/day
* NH3 - N oxidized = 3.2384kg/day
* Nitrogenous O2 demand = 14.89 kg of O2/day
* Carbonaceous O2 demand = 1.00 kg/day
* AOR (kg/day) = nitrogenous O2 demand + carbonaceous O2 demand (kg/day)
Where AOR = Actual Oxygen Requirements (kg O2/day)
* AOR = 15.89kg/day
SAOR (kg O2/hr) = [AOR x Cs x teta (T-20)] / [ae x (beta x Csw - C0) x blower usage (hr/day)
Where SAOR = standard actual O2 requirement (kg O2/day)

Teta = temperature correction factor = 1.024
Cs = O2 saturation concentration at standard temperature and pressure = 9.02 mg/L
Csw = concentration correction for elevation 1000 ft.
= 9.02 - 0.0003 x elevation = 8.72 mg/L
43
(NOTE: 0.0003 may be used as a rule of thumb describing a 0.0003 mg/L rise/drop in DO
saturation concentration per every foot of elevation increase /decrease.)
C0 = 2 mg/L
ae = 0.85
Beta = 0.95
T = 30 0C (67 0F)
Blower usage= 16 hrs/day
(Based on 4 cycles per day (6 hr/cycle), 1.0 hr fill time, 3.5 hr react time, 0.75 hr settle time, 0.5
hr decant time, and 0.25 hr idle time
SAOR = 2.12kg of O2/hr
* Sludge flow rate (L/day) = sludge mass flow (kg/day) / sludge density (kg/L)
* Typical sludge density = 1.02 kg/L
* Therefore sludge flow rate = 15.42 kg/day
3.4. FILTER FEED PUMPS:

* Pumping rate = 10.0 m3/hr
* Pumping head = 30.0m
* Duration of pumping = 6.0 hrs/day
1No. Working+1No. Standby = 1 set
3.5. RAW SEWAGE TRANSFER PUMPS:

* Duration of pumping = 1 hr/day
1No. Working+1No. Standby = 1 set
3.6. PRESSURE SAND FILTER:

* Total Flow = 40.0m3/batch
* Duration of Pumping assumed = 6 hrs
Surface loading considered = 12 m3/ m2/hr
44
* Area of filter required = 0.555m2

* Diameter of filter required = 0.84 Say 1.0 m
* Number of sand filters =1
* Height of shell = 1.5 m
* Media for sand filter: Pebbles, grit, silt, gravel, and coarse & fine sand.
3.7. ACTIVATED CARBON FILTER:

* Total Flow = 40.0m3/batch
* Duration of Pumping assumed = 6 hrs
Surface loading considered = 10 m3/ m2/hr
* Area of filter required = 0.666m2
* Diameter of filter required = 0.92 Say 1.0 m
* Number of sand filters =1
* Height of shell = 1.5 m
* Media for sand filter: Pebbles, grit, silt, gravel, and coarse & fine sand.
3.8. SLUDGE PUMP:
* Duration of pumping = 12 hrs/day
3.9. SLUDGE HOLDING TANK:
* Quantity of sludge generated = 115 m3/day
* Designing sludge holding tank with 1 day holding capacity
* Provided Volume of the tank = 17.25 Say 20.0cum
* Size of the tank – 20.0cum = 5.0sqmtx4.0m liquid depth
3.10. SCREW PUMP:

* Pumping head = 10 m
45
3.11. MECHANICAL FILTER PRESS:

* Quantity of sludge generated = 115 m3/day
* Design liquid sludge flow = 3450 L/day
* Daily solid sludge generation rate = 41.40 kg/day
* No. of days = 3 days
* Quantity of sludge solids load on the filter press = 124.20 kg/3 days
* Assume sludge holding capacity = 40 kg/m2
* Size of the filter press required = 3.105m2
* Let the size of each plate = 0.61 m × 0.61 m = 0.37 m2
* Number of plates required = 8.39no’s.
Say = 8 No’s
* Provide 1 filter press with 8 chambers each.
3.12. ALUM DOSING TANK WITH FLASH MIXER:
Provide metering pump of dosing capacity 4–6 LPH with 100 liters capacity dosing tank
3.13. COMMON TREATED WATER SUMP:
* Total Flow = 115m3/day

* Detention time = 12 hrs
* Volume of the unit required = 86.25 Say 90.0m3
Provided = 155.0 cum
* Air required = 45.0 m3/hr
* Size of the unit –155cum = 2.5mx5.3mx6.0m liquid depth and 5.0mx4.0mx4.0m liquid depth
46
3.14. BLOWER CAPACITY:
* Blower capacity required = Receiving tank + SBR + Treated

Water collection sump + 10% extra
= 85.0 m3/hr
3.15. UV DISINFECTION:
The filtered water is passed through an U.V. Sterilizer for disinfection. One number of U.V.
Sterilizer is provided for this purpose.
3.16. INTER PLANT PIPING:
Provide PVC pipes of 4 ksc pressure rating including necessary specials like tee’s, bends,
elbows, flanges etc
3.17. ELECTRICALS:
Provide and install motor control center with necessary cabling, earthing etc. complete.
Design details summary for STP.
Sl. no. Particulars Size

1 Bar screen 0.6 x 1.0m long
2 Receiving tank (1No.) 10.6mx5.0mx1.80m liquid depth
3 SBR (2 Nos.) 5.0mx4.0mx4.0m liquid depth of 2 Nos.
4 Pressure sand & carbon filter Each 1.0 m dia

5 Sludge holding tank (1No.) 5.0sqmtx4.0m liquid depth
6 Decant Tank (1No.) 34.20sqmtx2.0m liquid depth
7 Mechanical filter press (Plates of 8 Nos.) 0.61 m x 0.61
8 Common treated water collection sump- 2.5mx5.3mx6.0m liquid depth and
(2 Nos)
5.0mx4.0mx4.0m liquid depth
9 Blower capacity 85.0m3/hr
47
BOEING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, BOEING BANGALORE CAMPUS
4.0 SCHEMATIC FLOW CHART:

Flow in 115.0 m3/Day
Bar screen
Chamber
Flow meter
Air Blowers – 2 Nos.
Filter feed pump

Sludge used as manure
Activated Carbon filer
Pressure Sand filter
V Sterilizer
Flow meter for HVAC Flow Meter for flushing

purpose purpose
1
Reused for Landscape Development / toilet flushing
30 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: D
WATER BALANCE CHART
From Tankers/
Bore wells
Domestic water requirement for Flushing water requirement = Process water

B1 = 65.0cum/day 55.0 cum/day assumed for B2 =
5.0cum/day
90% after
Total Water diversity
Requirement
= 125.0Cum/day
Effluent waste water
generated from B2–
90% after
4.50cum/day
diversity
Wastewater generated – Effluent waste generated

112.50 cum/day from B2 will be connected
to Neutralization tank of
capacity = 5.0KL, after
neutralization will be
disposed to authorized
Sewage Treatment Plant of agencies.
Capacity = 115.0KLD
Landscaping – 60 KLD Flushing water – 55 KLD

Available re-cycled water from STP = 60.0KLD
Balance recycled water of capacity 131 KLD will
be tapped from KIADB main line.
31 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: E
WATER REQUIREMENT & SEWAGE DISPOSAL DURING CONSTRUCTION

PHASE
Domestic water requirements during construction phase.

Total number of manpower required : 500
Water requirements @ of 45 LPCD : 500 x 45 = 22,500 L/day or say 22.5 KLD
Total domestic water requirements : 22.5 KLD
Wastewater discharge (Considering 80% of water consumed comes out as wastewater)

= 22,500 X 0.80 = 18,000 L/day or say 20 KLD
The wastewater generated will be treated in Package Sewage Treatment Plant of 20 KLD
Capacity, which will be designed based on Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR) Technology, the
treated sewage will be reused for flushing and dust suppression.
Design details summary for 20 KLD STP

Sl. no. Particulars Size
1 Bar Screen 0.3 m x 0.5 m
2 Equalization cum neutralization Tank 1.38 m x 1.38 m x 3.5 m
3 SBR 2.36 m x 2.36 m x 3.5 m
4 Mechanical filter press 0.61m x 0.61m
5 Pressure Sand and Carbon Filter - 1 each 0.46 m
32 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: F
SOLID WASTE GENERATION & ITS MANAGEMENT - CONSTRUCTION

PHASE:
The total manpower : 500
Considering solid waste generation @ 0.2 kg/capita/day
Total solid waste generation : 500 x 0.2 = 100 Kg/day
The domestic wastes will be composted and product will be used as manure.
OCCUPANCY PHASE:
The wastes that are generated from the day to day activities which are in solid form are
categorized as solid wastes. Solid Wastes include dry refuse of house and street sweepings,
crockery, Kitchen Wastes, and also electronic wastes. The quantity of solid waste generated
from the proposed project is calculated as follows.
Total Contributing population from the project 2500 Persons

Assuming solid waste generation rate as 0.2 kg/person/day
Quantity of solid waste generated from the project 500 Kg/day
Organic solid waste: 60 % of the total waste 300 kg/day
Inorganic solid waste: 40 % of the total waste 200 kg/day
The solid Wastes generated will be segregated at its point of generation and collected
separately in different color coded Synthetic Bins depending upon the basis of its Bio
Degradability at a common designated point. Organic solid waste from the project will be
treated in an organic converter and is used as manure for Landscape or used as fuel. The
inorganic solid waste is proposed to be recycled.
33 PROJECT REPORT
ORGANIC WASTE CONVERTER

Operational Procedure
Collection of Organic
Waste in Container
Feed the waste in the machine after

draining excess of water from waste
Mix culture and absorbent with waste
Crush and mix (10 min)
Repeat the feeding batches till

material finishes
Collect crushed pulp in a tray for aeration

& drying. Ensure sufficient spreading for
proper drying in tray for making pellets or
make heap for composting After Conversion
Recycle dry pulp as additive with next

Fresh waste in (10:4) & remaining as final
product i.e. fuel
pellets or organic manure
Clean the machine at the end of

operation
Fuel pellets needs 2-3 days of sun drying and Bio-manure needs 10-15 days curing time in open
space.
34 PROJECT REPORT
PROCESS FLOW CHART OF ORGANIC WASTE CONVERTER
Organic Waste
Waste Treatment 10 min
Output (Homogenized
& Odor Free)
Sun Drying For 2 Days in open Curing 15-20 Days in a Container

for Fuel Pellets for Bio - Manure
Water / Room Heating Kinder Garden / Landscaping

Application Application
The compost formed by this method will have a pH value of 6.5 – 7.5 C:N ratio of 15:1 and
organic matter of 40 – 50%. There will not be any pathogens and the pellets manufactured will
have a calorific value of 3500 to 4000 Kcal/Kg.
35 PROJECT REPORT
SECONDARY SLUDGE FROM STPs:
The solid waste generated from the STP’s of secondary settling is in the form of stabilized
secondary sludge. Then is passed through the Plate & Frame filter press, the solids obtained as
semi solid cakes are used as organic manure for the development of plantations within the
premises of the . The quantity of secondary sludge from the secondary settling units of the
treatment
* Rate: 115m3/day and Sludge : 42 Kg/Day
HAZARDOUS WASTE:
The Hazardous waste generated from the project is waste oil from DG set of about 250 – 300
Litres/annum which will be stored in closed barrels and disposed to KSPCB approved and
CPCB register waste oil re-processors. Authorization will be obtained from KSPCB as per
Hazardous waste (Management & Handling) Amendment Rules, 2008.
BIO MEDICAL WASTE:
The Bio Medical Waste generated from the project will be collected and segregated at source
based on their categorization as per the Biomedical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules in
ccontainers and will be disposed as per the guidelines. Common designated place will be
earmarked for the storage of bio medical waste and will be disposed scientifically.
e - WASTE:
The Electronic Waste (e-waste) such as CD’s, Pen drives, computer and its components, used
batteries, etc., from the project will be segregated, collected and stored at a designated place
and will be handed over to authorized recyclers.
36 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE – G
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN:
1. INTRODUCTION:
The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is aimed at mitigating the possible adverse impact
of a project and ensuring the existing environmental quality. The EMP converse all aspects of
planning, construction and operation of the project relevant to environment. It is essential to
implement the EMP right from the planning stage continuing throughout the construction and
operation stage. Therefore the main purpose of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is
to identify the project specific activities that would have to be considered for the significant
adverse impacts and the mitigation measures required.
The construction phase impacts are mostly short term, restricted to the plot area and not
envisaged on the larger scale. In the operational phase the environmental impacts are due to
continuous operation of the project, hence, the emphasis in the Environment Management Plan
(EMP) is to minimize such impacts. The following mitigation measures are recommended in
order to synchronize the economic development of the project area with the environmental
protection of the region.
The emphasis on the EMP development is on the following;

 Mitigation measures for each of the activities causing the environmental Impact.
 Monitoring plans for checking activities and environmental parameters and monitoring
responsibilities.
 Role responsibilities and resource allocation for monitoring; and
 Implementation of the Scheduled plan.
Environmental Management Plan has been discussed in the following sections separately for
Construction phase and Operational phase.
37 PROJECT REPORT
2. EMP DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

During Construction phase, the activities which need to be monitored and managed from the
point of pollution are detailed in the subsequent sections.
2.1 LEVELLING AND SITE CLEARANCE:

The proposed project having one lower ground. The total quantity of excavated soil is about
50,000 cum. All excavated soil will be used for landscape development and for backfilling within
the project site.
Environmental Management Plan during Leveling and Site Clearance:

Environmental Mitigation Proposed Remarks
Impacts
Noise  Most optimum no. of operation by the To reduce noise
generation: Heavy equipment. level, Equipment
Caused due to  Selection of equipment with less noise generation. provided with noise
Excavators and  The earth moving equipment shall be periodically control devices is
Bulldozers checked and maintained for noise levels. only used.
 The workers will be provided with PPE such as

ear plugs.
Dust generation:  The site cleared will be periodically watered to Tertiary treated
Leveling reduce dust emissions water to be used.
operations  Barricades like metal sheets will be provided all
results in the round the premises to avoid fugitive dust emission
emission of dust. in to the neighboring area apart from water
sprinkling.
 The workers will be provided with PPE such as
nose masks and goggles to reduce impact.
38 PROJECT REPORT
2.2 TRANSPORTATION OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS:

During the Transportation of construction materials, minimum no. of vehicles will be used.
Most optimum route is planned to reduce the impact of transportation activity on the
environment.
Environmental Management during Transportation
Environmental Impacts Mitigation Proposed
Noise generation  Quality fuel will be used.
 Periodic maintenance of vehicles is required.
Dust generation  Quality packaging of the construction materials
 Construction materials will be covered with tarpaulin sheet
to prevent from being air borne
 The vehicle speed shall be regulated
 The workers transporting materials will be provided with
PPE such as nose masks to reduce impact of air borne dust
on their health
Vehicular emissions  Periodic emission check for vehicles will be done
 Clean fuel will be used for vehicles
2.3 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES:

During the construction work, the following impacts are identified to monitor and mitigate
the level of impact.
Environmental Management during Construction
Impacts
Noise generation  Less noise generating equipment Implementation
 Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) such responsibility:
as ear plugs and helmets will be provided for Contractor - Civil
workers Works
 The working hours to be imposed on the
39 PROJECT REPORT
Dust generation  PPE in the form of nose masks will be Implementation
provided for construction workers responsibility:
 Use of water sprays to prevent dust from Contractor
being air borne
 Barricades like metal sheets will be
provided all around the premises to avoid
fugitive dust emission in to the neighboring
area apart from water sprinkling
Water discharge  Sewage generated will be treated in Implementation
(construction packaged STP. responsibility:
works) Contractor
Air Emissions from  Periodic check and regular maintenance of Implementation
Construction construction machinery for emissions. responsibility:
machinery  Clean fuel is used in equipments. Contractor
2.4 WASTEWATER DISCHARGE:

The sewage generated from the labors during construction is estimated to be about 20 KLD
will be treated in packaged STP.
2.4.1 LABOUR:
Environmental Management for Labor Camp:
Impacts
Wastewater Provision of adequate sanitation facilities. Responsibility:
generation Contractor
Usage of water Water for labors will be supplied in required Responsibility:
quantities. Contractor
40 PROJECT REPORT
Solid waste Segregation of Dry Waste and Wet Waste. Implementation

generation Adequate facilities to handle solid wastes responsibility:
shall be provided and will be composted and Contractor –
product is used as manure. maintenance.
2.5 DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED EARTH:

The proposed project having one lower ground. The total quantity of excavated soil is about
50,000 cum. All excavated soil will be used for landscape development and for backfilling within
the project site.
2.6 PERSONNEL SAFETY SYSTEM:

It is planned to adopt the safe working practices which shall govern all construction works
undertaken throughout the project. Following Safety Aids to all laborers will be provided:
 Safety Helmets, Safety Belts, Safety Shoes, Hand gloves
 Gumboots while concreting
 Safety Goggles while welding / Stone dressing etc.,
 Facemasks and full body kit while Pest control
Implementation of Safety procedures such as:

• Using proper lifting techniques
• Using Safe Scaffolds
• Hot work permits for Fabrication and Welding
41 PROJECT REPORT
FINANCIAL ALLOCATION AND BUDGETARY PROVISION FOR EMP

ASPECTS (CONSTRUCTION ASPECTS)
Sl. Description Financial Provision in
No. Lakhs
Capital Recurring
Cost Cost
1 Environmental Management Plan during construction phase:
Using tertiary treated water for
• Sprinkling to control fugitive dusts
 Construction & curing purposes 2.0 0.5
 Flushing and Package STP 2.0 0.5
5.0 0.5
2 Sewage Treatment Plant for Operation Phase and 85.0 -
construction phase
3 Potable water requirement for the construction workers 1.0 0.5
4 Maintenance of Vehicles and equipments - 1.0
5 Top Soil Conservation 1.0 -
6 Temporary Storm Water Drains 5.0 1.0
7 Personal protection safety gadgets and health care. 1.0 0.5
8 First aid facilities for workers 1.0 0.5
9 Plantation of Saplings 3.0 -
10 Environmental Monitoring Plan (Air, Noise, Water and Solid - 1.0
Waste).
11 TOTAL 106 6.0
Contingency at 10 % 10.6 0.6
TOTAL 117 6.6
3. EMP DURING OPERATION PHASE:

Following are the identified operational phase activities in the impact assessment, which
may have impact on the environment.
1. Air quality
2. Water quality
3. Noise quality
4. Solid waste disposal
5. Green belt development
6. Storm water Management
42 PROJECT REPORT
3.1 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT:

The pollutants envisaged from the proposed project are SPM, SO2, NOx, HC and CO mainly
due to burning of liquid fuel (HSD) in DG.
Exhaust from DG set will be emitted from stack of adequate height for dispersion of
gaseous pollutants. The following Table presents the EMP for air quality management during
operation phase.
Air Quality Management during Operation Phase
DG set  Equipment selected will ensure the exhaust
emission standard as prescribed as per the latest
amendments from the MoEF.
 DG will be used as stand-by unit
 Periodic check and maintenance
Ambient air quality  Ambient air quality monitoring as per the
prescribed norms at regular interval.
3.2 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT:

Water requirement of project will be augmented through KIADB/BWSSB sources. Details of
water requirement and Water balance is presented in Annexure B & D respectively.
The sewage generated from the proposed project will be treated in the proposed STP. The
treatment scheme for domestic sewage generated from project is discussed in Annexure - C.
Treated water will be reused for flushing, gardening etc., and the following Table presents the
EMP for water quality.
43 PROJECT REPORT
Water Quality Management during Operation Phase

Environmental impacts Mitigation Proposed
Wastewater  Treated with proposed Sewage Treatment
Plant to produce tertiary treated water which is reused
for secondary purposes such as flushing landscaping
development etc.,
 Water conservation measures will be encouraged
3.3 NOISE MANAGEMENT:

High noise generating units such as DG set will be provided with acoustic enclosures.
Green belt on the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and helps in attenuation of
noise. The Table presents the EMP for noise level.
Noise Management during Operation Phase
Noise from DG set area  Acoustic enclosures will be provided for DG set
 DG set will be installed in an area (utility section) where
the access will be restricted
 The use of PPE (ear plugs) will be mandatory in this area.
 Selection of equipment to ensure that the residual noise
level of <55 dB(A)
 Noise levels will be checked periodically using a noise
pressure level meter
3.4 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT:

The solid wastes generated during operation phase can be categorized under
Three types: Domestic/Residential Waste
Wet Garbage: Food waste, Lawn mowing wastes etc.,
Dry Garbage: Paper, Plastic, Bottles, etc.,
44 PROJECT REPORT
Sludge from Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

The solid waste generated and its management is detailed in Annexure – F.
The various mitigation measures to be adopted during collection and disposal of wastes are as
follows:
 It is preferable that the container and bins used for collection of waste should be of
closed type and waste is not exposed thus possibility of spreading of disease through
flies and mosquitoes is minimized.
 Collection system should be properly supervised so that quick and regular removal of
waste from the dustbin is practiced.
 Door to door collection shall be done in each building to collect the solid wastes.
3.5 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT:

As the project location is blessed with fairly good rainfall, it is planned to collect the
storm water at different gradients of the location. There will be rainfall runoff from building
roof-tops, roads and pavements and greenbelt area. Necessary provision will be made to collect
the quantity of rainfall runoff during the most rainy day of season. Necessary rain harvesting
pit/recharge pit have been envisaged. Rain water storage tanks of 225KL and 250 KL and
surface run-off collection tank of 565KL have been provided.
3.6 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT:

Vegetation is the natural extension of the soil ecosystem on a site. It can provides
summer shade, wind protection and a low-maintenance landscape that is adapted to the local
environment. Unfortunately, the common practice is to remove the existing landscape cover
and replace with a generic, water and maintenance-intensive lawn.
45 PROJECT REPORT
About 895 trees of species will be planted at site. Two rows of trees with tall and dwarf species
will be planted along the periphery of the site in staggered manner at regular intervals to
function as buffer zone for attenuate noise and dust control and act as lung space.
Following approach will be adopted for Vegetation and Ground Management. It is

planned to include an ecologically knowledgeable landscape architect as an integral member of
the design team.
Preservation of existing vegetation, especially native plants, will possibly be

incorporated. Avoid fencing off property where possible to make landscape available to
community increasing project integration.
 Decrease paving and monoculture lawns.

 Avoid replacing mature trees with young seedlings.
 Protect existing plants during construction. Delineate the "drip line" around trees and
demark or fence off areas to avoid damage.
 Contain heavy equipment and stockpiling areas to predefined areas.
 Design new plantings as diverse communities of species well adapted to the site. Plant
native species of varying ages. Select vegetation that attracts wildlife.
 Avoid invasive species and monocultures (same species, same age).
4. MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC ISSUES:

1) Schools for laborer’s children
Temporary education centers (Crèche) will be provided for education of the children of the
laborers.
46 PROJECT REPORT
2) Health camp for laborer’s family

Periodical health camps will be organized to monitor and facilitate the occupants of the
labor camps.
HEALTH RISK AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT:

Public health and safety:
Since all the construction related activities are confined to the project site, minimal health
related impacts are envisaged within the project influenced area during the construction stage.
At the project site on an average of 200 no. of persons will be engaged, who face direct
exposure to dust and noise generated from the construction activity. This is likely to cause
health related affects such as asthma, bronchitis etc. and hearing impairments respectively.
To minimize these anticipated impacts, suitable actions like
• Use of water sprinklers to prevent dust from being air borne.
• Providing suitable personal protective equipments (PPE) like mouth mask with filters, noise
mask, helmets etc.
• Periodic health check up camp for the laborers will be arranged.
• Provision of safety belts.
• In case of injury on site medical treatment and transport will be organized.
Due to operation of the proposed project, there will be enhancement in public Health and
safety.
 Regular visit of resident medical officer to take care of the first aid and primary
medication in case of emergency for project occupants and laborers.
 First aid kit with primary medicines will always be available in the medical centre.
 Display of action plan and preparedness measures during emergency situations.
47 PROJECT REPORT
5. EMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:

Phased according to the priority, the implementation schedule is presented in the following
table.
Implementation Schedule for EMP
Sl. Recommendations Requirement
No.
1 Air pollution control measures Before commissioning of respective units
2 Water pollution control measures Before commissioning of the project
3 Noise control measures Along with the commissioning of the
Project
4 Solid waste management During commissioning of the project
5 Green belt development Stage-wise implementation
48 PROJECT REPORT
FINANCIAL ALLOCATION AND BUDGETARY PROVISION FOR EMP

ASPECTS (OCCUPANCY PHASE)
Sl. Description Financial Provision in
No. Lakhs
Capital Recurring
Cost Cost
1 Operation of Sewage Treatment Plant - 5.0
2 Reclaimed Sewage Distribution Network 10.0 1.0
3 Rain water harvesting tanks and its facilities 10.0 1.0
4 Ground water recharging pits & its management 15.0 2.0
5 DG sets acoustic & Maintenance 10.0 1.0
6 Landscaping 10.0 2.0
7 Solid waste management 12.0 1.0
8 Environmental Monitoring Plan per annum (Air, Noise, - 1.0
Water and Soil)
9 TOTAL 67 14
Contingency at 10 % 6.7 1.4
TOTAL 73.7 15.4
49 PROJECT REPORT
6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ROUTINES:

A comprehensive monitoring program is suggested below:
Monitoring Schedule for Environmental Parameters
Sl. Particulars Monitoring Duration of Important
No frequency monitoring parameters for
monitoring
I Air Quality
1. Ambient Air monitoring
Project premises Once in a 24 hourly RSPM, SPM, SO2,
month sample NOx
2. Stack monitoring Once in a Grab SPM, SO2, NOx,
year if HC, CO
required
II Water and Wastewater Quality
1. Water Quality
i. Groundwater at two locations (up- Once in a Grab As per KSPCB
gradient and down-gradient) of month requirements
treated effluent discharge area/land
2. Wastewater quality
i. Inlet into STP NA NA -
ii. Treated effluent prior to discharge NA NA -
III Soil Quality
1. Within project premises at 1 Once in 6 Composite As per KSPCB
location on effluent discharging month sample requirements
area/land
2. Ecological preservation and up Seasonal Visual Survival rate
gradation observations
IV Noise monitoring
1. Project premises Once in 6 Day and night As per KSPCB
month requirements
50 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: H
RAIN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN:

VOLUME OF RAIN WATER HARVESTED:
The total quantity of water i.e., received in the form of rainfall over an area is called the rain
water endowment of that area, out of which the amount of water that can be effectively
harvested is called the rain water harvesting potential.
Rain Water harvesting potential = Intensity of Rainfall (m) x Roof Area x Impermeability Factor.
The collection efficiency accounts for the fact that all the rain water falling over an area can not
be effectively harvested due to losses on account of evaporation, spillage or run off etc.,
According to the data available from the Indian Meteorological Department, the
Average annual rainfall around month of September = 194.80 mm
Assuming that about 90 % Rainfall can be effectively harvested.
Number of Rainy Days = 9.3
Therefore the I.R = 194.80/9.3= 20.94 mm/day or 0.02094 m/Day or 0.021 m/day
The Quantity of roof top rainwater harvested from the proposed is calculated as:
The ground coverage area of the proposed project is about 9,035 sq m
For rain water harvesting consider 75 % of this total area is 6,776 sq m
Quantity of Rain Water that can be harvested from the building is as follows.
51 PROJECT REPORT
Sl. Description
No.
1 Block B1- Office Fifth Floor 5,194 sq m =
Block For rain water harvesting consider 75 % of the total area = 3895.5 sq
m
Rain water (Q) from Roof top = 0.021 x 3895.5 x 0.9
= 73.62 cum/day or say 74 cum/day.--
-------(A)
2 Block B2:- Second Floor 9753 sq m =

Lab/AIT For rain water harvesting consider 75 % of the total area = 7179.75
sq m
Rain water (Q) from Roof top = 0.021 x 7179.75 x 0.9
= 135.69 cum/day or say 136
cum/day.---------(B)
3 Block B3, B4 & Ground floor 2672 sq m = For rain water harvesting consider 75 %
B5 :- Utility & of the total area = 2004 sq m
remaining blocks Rain water (Q) from Roof top = 0.021 x 2004 x 0.9
= 37.87 cum/day or say
38 cum/day.---------(D)
Total Quantity of Rain Water that can be harvested from the Project = A+B+C =
248 cum/day
7.3 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT:

Storm water disposal is divided into 2 Groups:
 Terrace Storm water disposal: The entire rainwater from the terrace would be disposed
through suitable rain water pipes and collecting in the dedicated rain water collection
sump, which is proposed at site level. This water will be utilized for domestic purpose
(as detailed in VOLUME OF RAIN WATER HARVESTED).
 Site (Paved and landscape area) Storm water disposal: The entire storm water from the
site would be disposed off through suitable RCC Box drainage system to the rainwater
recharge pits and the excess is diverted to external storm water drainage.
The amount of storm water that the paved area will produce can be determined by considering
the impermeability factor to be 0.9.
52 PROJECT REPORT
Q = 0.021 x 25984.21sq m x 0.9

= 491.10 cum/day or say 492 cum/day
The amount of storm water that the landscaped area will produce can be determined by
considering the impermeability factor to be 0.3
Q = 0.021 x 63,379.09 sq m x 0.3
= 399.28 cum/day or say 400 cum/day
The Total amount of storm water = paved area + landscaped area
= 492 + 400 cum/day
= 892 cum/day
The Project Proponents shall also Provide Recharging Pits along the inner periphery of the
boundary wall with recharging pit of size of 1.2 m dia x 3.0 m deep spaced at 25 m center to
center. These recharging pits are filled with graded media comprising of Boulder at bottom and
with coarse aggregates to facilitate percolation of harvested rain water to Recharge Ground
Water table. The Recharge Pits are interconnected in such a way that the rain led to the first
recharge pit is also led to the next pit. The excess rain water shall be drained off to the storm
water drain.
53 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: I
DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR PRE CONSTRUCTION PHASE:
Risk and disaster management plan:

Disaster is an unexpected event due to sudden failure of the system, external threats,
internal disturbances, earth quakes, fire and accidents. Thus an appropriate management plan
shall be incorporated.
Precautions:
 Once the likelihood of the disaster is suspected, preventive actions should be undertaken
by the project in-charge.
 Conditional maintenance of equipments, materials and expertise for use during
emergency.
 The electrical systems shall be provided with automatic circuit breakers activated by over
current.
 Proper escape routes are planned and displayed in the public domain.
 Selected representatives are given proper training to guide other inhabitants during Fire
accidents.
 Periodic awareness program is conducted for the workers on their roles during
emergency situations.
Important telephone numbers like police authorities, fire department and hospitals etc., of use
during emergency situations will be made available.
54 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: J
Environmental Management Plan for control of Dust and Noise pollution during construction
phase:
 Barricades like metal sheets will be provided all round the premises of the project to avoid
fugitive dust emission in to the neighboring area and frequent water sprinkling will also be
carried out.

1. Leveling and Site Clearance:
Noise generation: Caused  Most optimum no. of operation by the heavy
due to Excavators and equipment
Bulldozers
 Selection of equipment with less noise generation to
be used
 The earth moving equipment will be periodically
checked and maintained for noise levels.
 The workers will be provided with adequate PPE such
as ear plugs to reduce impact of high noise levels.
Dust generation: Leveling  The site cleared will be periodically watered to reduce
operations results in the emission of dust particles
emission of dust.
 Barricades like metal sheets will be provided all round
the premises to avoid fugitive dust emission in to the
neighboring area apart from water sprinkling.
 The workers will be provided with PPE such as nose
masks and goggles to reduce impact on health.
2. Transportation of Construction Materials:
 Noise generation  Quality fuel will be used.
 Periodic maintenance of vehicles is required.
 Dust generation  Quality packaging of the construction materials
 Construction materials will be covered with tarpaulin
sheet to prevent from being air borne
 The vehicle speed shall be regulated
 The workers transporting materials will be provided
55 PROJECT REPORT
with PPE such as nose masks to reduce impact of air

borne dust on their health
1. Construction Activities:
 Noise generation  Selection of Less noise generating equipment
 Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) such as ear
plugs and helmets will be provided for workers
 The working hours will be imposed on the
 Dust generation  PPE in the form of nose masks will be provided for
construction workers
 Use of water sprays to prevent dust from being air
borne
 Barricades like metal sheets will be provided all around
the premises to avoid fugitive dust emission in to the
neighboring area apart from water sprinkling
56 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: K
RISK ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT PLAN:
a. Construction Phase:
Sl. Potential Mitigation
No.
1 Accidental fire Fire safety gadgets.
2 Fall of objects Use of personal protection devices-helmets
3 Working at great heights Protection to prevent fall, with life safety belts and
nets.
4 Accidents from machinery Personal protection gadgets
5 Electrical mishap Adopting safety measures to prevent any act of
negligence and providing electrical safety measures
like fire extinguishers.
b. All necessary measures will be taken to avoid accidents and mishaps during operation phase.
Precautions for Risk and Disaster Management Plan:

 Once the likelihood of the disaster is suspected, preventive actions should be undertaken
by the project in-charge.
 Conditional maintenance of equipments, materials, and expertise for use during
emergency.
 The electrical systems shall be provided with automatic circuit breakers activated by over
current.
 Fire extinguishers provided at pre-notified locations inside the building.
 Proper escape routes will be planned and displayed in the public domain.
 Selected representatives will be given proper training to guide other inhabitants during
Fire accidents.
 Periodic awareness program is conducted for the occupants on their roles during
emergency situations.
Important telephone numbers like police authorities, fire department and hospitals etc., of use
during emergency situations are made available.
57 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: M
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES
58 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE: N
ENERGY CONSERVATION ASPECTS PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT:
a. Copper wound Oil filled transformers with efficiency not lower than the limits specified in
section 8.2.1 of the code shall be considered.
b. Power monitoring, recording and check metering will be provided in the main LT panels on
the incoming feeders and individual outgoing feeders covering all parameters such as Current,
Voltage, Energy & THDI as stipulated in section 8.2.4 of the code.
c. Cable sizing and design of distribution system will ensure that the total distribution loss will
not exceed 1% of the total energy consumed as stipulated in section 8.2.5.1 of the code.
d. Timer controls will be incorporated in the distribution board of external lighting to save
energy as stipulated in section 7.4 of the code.
e. Power conditioning equipment will be installed to limit THDI to 5% which shall also improve
power factor to 0.95 as stipulated in section 8.2.3 of the code.
f. Solar Lighting shall be provided at strategic locations in outdoor areas.
g. Use of Energy Efficient LED light fixtures.
h. Use of VFD drives for lifts.
i. The percentage of energy saving achieved for this project is 20. 9%
59 PROJECT REPORT
ANNEXURE – 0
PROJECT RELEATED DRAWINGS & PLANS
60 PROJECT REPORT
REPORT ON
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
BIETC CAMPUS , DEVANAHALLI , BENGALURU
(REPORT No: S-1270(B)/ 2017-18/ Ver.3)
Prepared For
M/s Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.
SARATHY GEOTECH & ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.

ISO 9001:2008 & OHSAS 18001:2007 Certified
NABL Accredited Laboratory
3 27 Jan 18 IFA Issued for Approval SGES GP MKP PT
Ver No. Date Status Revision Memo Issued Prepared Verified Approved
27th Jan 2018 Report No.: S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3
To
Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.
RMZ Infinity, Tower D, 5th Floor,
Old Madras Road, Bengaluru,
Karnataka 560001
Dear Sir,
REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BIETC

CAMPUS PROJECT, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU
We are pleased to submit this report on geotechnical investigation for the proposed BIETC
campus project, Devanahalli, Bengaluru. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you.
Please feel free to contact us should there be any clarifications.
Sincerely,
For Sarathy Geotech & Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.
Ms. Minnu K P
Lead Engineer
Dr. Prashanth Talkad

Dy. CEO
REPORT ON
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED BIETC
CAMPUS PROJECT, DEVANAHALLI , BENGALURU
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................................ 1
3.0 TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY OF PROJECT LOCATION...................................................... 2
4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................... 2
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................... 3
5.1 Drilling ............................................................................................................................................... 4
5.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT): IS 2131 .................................................................................... 5
6.0 LABORATORY TESTING ON SOIL ...................................................................................................... 6
6.1 Laboratory Testing Procedures on Soil ......................................................................................... 7
6.1.1 Natural Moisture Content and Unit Weight (IS 2720 Part-2) ................................. 7
6.1.2 Specific Gravity (IS 2720 Part-3)…………………………………………………7
6.1.3 Particle Size Analysis (IS 2720 Part-4) ................................................................... 8
6.1.4 Atterberg Limit Test (IS 2720 Part-5) .................................................................... 8
6.1.5 Unconfined Compressive Strength (IS 2720 Part-10) ............................................ 8
6.1.6 Direct Shear Test (IS 2720 Part-13) ....................................................................... 8
6.1.7 One Dimensional Consolidation Test (IS 2720 Part-15) ........................................ 9
6.1.8 Chloride content: California Test 422 .................................................................... 9
6.1.9 Organic content Test (IS 2720 Part -22) ................................................................ 9
6.1.10 pH of Soil (IS 2720 Part-26)…………………………………………………….10
6.1.11 Sulphate content (IS 2720 Part-27)………………………………………….…..10
7.0 SUBSTRATUM OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION ....................................... 10

8.0 EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY .......................................................................... 14
8.1 General ............................................................................................................................................. 14
8.1.1 Bearing Capacity for Isolated Foundation (Shear Criteria) ................................... 14
8.1.2 Bearing Capacity of Isolated Foundation (Settlement Criteria) ............................ 14
8.1.3 Bearing Capacity for Raft Foundation (Settlement Criteria) ................................. 14
8.1.4 Immediate Settlement Calculation………………………………………………15
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3
REPORT ON
9.0 GROUND WATER TABLE ...................................................................................................................... 15

10.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 15
11.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 18
12.0 DISCLAIMER ............................................................................................................................................... 19
Appendix-A
i. Plate No. 1- Borehole Location Drawing
ii. Plate No. 2- Stratigraphy Drawing
iii. Plate No. 3- GINT Borelogs
iv. Plate No. 4- Summary of Test Results
v. Plate No. 5- Symbols
Appendix-B
i. Sample Calculation for SBC
ii. SPT v/s Depth Plots
iii. Laboratory Test Plots
Appendix-C
i. Site Investigation Photographs
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3
REPORT ON
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/s. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. has approached M/s Sarathy Geotech & Engineering Services Pvt.
Ltd. (SGES) to carry out geotechnical investigation for the proposed BIETC project, Devanahalli,
Bengaluru. M/s Boeing has appointed M/s Turner & Townsend as client representative and
PMC contractor for this project.
SGES mobilized three (3) set of rotary drilling rigs and a team of engineers and drillers.The drilling
activities at Twenty Two (22) borehole locations were carried out from 6th November 2017 to 2nd
December 2017.
This report presents the geotechnical information of the site which includes laboratory & field test
results, borehole logs, soil stratigraphy, engineering analysis and recommendations for the
proposed construction.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for the geotechnical investigation campaign are listed as follows:
• Drilling boreholes up to a maximum depth of twenty (20) meters below EGL, until refusal
is reached or three (3) meters in to hard rock, whichever is earlier by using Rotary Drilling
rigs. The minimum diameter of the bore hole shall be 150 mm and boring shall be carried
out in accordance with the provisions of IS:1892 and as per this specification
• Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at every 1.5 m interval.
• Collection of undisturbed soil samples if cohesive soil strata is met with.
• Collection of disturbed soil samples as necessary for conducting lab tests.
• Conducting relevant laboratory tests on soil samples collected from the boreholes as per
specifications.
• Installation of Stand Pipe/ Piezometers in the boreholes and measurement of ground water
table level, as directed by Boeing/PMC
• Preparation and submission of report including Safe Bearing Capacity (SBC) of soil and
foundation recommendations.
• Reporting the acquired field information based on the field and laboratory test results.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 1
REPORT ON
3.0 TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY OF PROJECT LOCATION
Topography and Climate16, 17: The site is located at North Bengaluru taluk, relatively at a level
plateau and at an average height of 839 to 962 meters above sea level. Due to its elevation,
Bengaluru enjoys a pleasant and equable climate throughout the year. The new record is around
40 degrees Celsius. Winter temperatures rarely drop below 14 °C (52 °F) and summer temperatures
seldom exceed 36 °C (97 °F). Bengaluru receives about 970 mm of rain annually. The annual
average wind speed as documented from meteorological office is roughly in the order of 12.8
km/h. The proposed project location lies in seismic Zone II18, which represents a
seismically stable region. Bengaluru city has been untouched by major seismic events. Only
mild tremors have been recorded in the city.
Geology15: Bengaluru Rural district forms part of the Deccan Plateau and is covered by peninsular
gneiss, granites, basic dykes and laterites. Nearly two thirds of the district is composed of gneisses
and granite gneisses. The soils of Bengaluru Rural districts are broadly classified into four
categories viz. (i) Loamy soil (ii) Lateritic soil (iii) Lateritic gravelly soil and (iv) Red sandy soil. Red
loamy soils generally occur on hilly to undulating land slope on granite and granite gneisses, found
in Devanahalli taluk wherein the proposed project site fall in. Lateritic soil occurs in undulating
terrain forming plain to gently sloping topography of peninsular gneiss region. Lateritic gravelly
soils occur in upland regions of lateritic soils. This soil occurs in Devanahalli taluk. Red sandy soil
occurs in undulating land slopes. These soils are derived from acidic rocks granites and granitic
gneiss.
4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The proposed project site is situated at K.I.A.D.B- Bengaluru Aerospace Components &
Aerospace SEZ Industrial Area at Devanahalli, North Bengaluru. The site is located at a distance
of about 30 km from Hebbal via NH-44 towards Yelahanka, a diversion has to be taken at BK
Halli Road Junction, towards B Marenahalli. Also, the site is located at a distance of 17km from
Kempegowda International Airport. Proposed project location has been indicated in Fig. 1. Total
area of plot is 22.77 acres i.e. (92158.52 sq.ft.), with a plot perimeter of 1282.806 m. Towards the
North side of the plot there is an agricultural land. (Refer topographic survey report: S-
1270(A)/2017-18/Ver.3 for the site topography and survey details).
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 2
REPORT ON
Fig. 1 Google Earth view of Plot No.59
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

Three sets (3) of rotary drilling rigs were mobilized to site on 06th November 2017. Coordinates
of borehole were located using Global Positing System (GPS) and reduced levels for each location
were obtained using Total Station. Table-1 provides the summary of the coordinates and reduced
levels for proposed borehole locations.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 3
REPORT ON
Table 1 Co-ordinates of the borehole location
Co-ordinates (m)
BH No. RL (m)
Easting Northing
BH-01 795194.882 1458691.695 889.463
BH-02 795160.626 1458710.785 889.329
BH-03 795124.947 1458730.598 889.191
BH-04 795091.755 1458749.878 888.825
BH-05 795054.211 1458770.632 887.296
BH-06 795216.664 1458723.896 890.349
BH-07 795182.829 1458746.173 890.179
BH-08 795146.341 1458763.868 889.827
BH-09 795104.575 1458784.047 889.432
BH-10 795077.105 1458803.602 887.495
BH-11 795237.196 1458757.934 891.051
BH-12 795203.946 1458778.784 890.724
BH-13 795168.596 1458798.230 890.393
BH-14 795134.398 1458817.485 890.362
BH-15 795099.546 1458837.303 889.941
BH-16 795261.162 1458791.600 891.659
BH-17 795225.618 1458811.532 891.362
BH-18 795185.333 1458839.019 891.215
BH-19 795154.312 1458850.245 890.852
BH-21 795285.257 1458831.280 892.132
BH-22 795247.041 1458846.331 891.924
BH-23 795212.432 1458864.719 891.673
5.1 Drilling
Drilling consists of sinking total twenty two (22) boreholes by rotary drilling rig. These boreholes
were drilled up to a maximum depth of 20m from existing ground level. Table 2 provides the
borehole drilling duration and termination depth.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 4
REPORT ON
Table 2 Borehole Drilling Information
Duration of Investigation RL of
Terminated
Borehole Termination
Start Date End Date Depth (m)
(m)
BH-01 17-11-2017 21-11-2017 20.0 869.463
BH-02 15-11-2017 16-11-2017 20.0 869.329
BH-03 22-11-2017 23-11-2017 20.0 869.191
BH-04 24-11-2017 25-11-2017 20.0 868.825
BH-05 22-11-2017 23-11-2017 20.0 867.296
BH-06 6-11-2017 9-11-2017 20.0 860.349
BH-07 9-11-2017 11-11-2017 20.0 870.179
BH-08 11-11-2017 14-11-2017 20.0 869.827
BH-09 25-11-2017 27-11-2017 20.0 869.432
BH-10 24-11-2017 25-11-2017 20.0 867.495
BH-11 6-11-2017 9-11-2017 20.0 871.051
BH-12 10-11-2017 13-11-2017 20.0 870.724
BH-13 13-11-2017 15-11-2017 20.0 870.393
BH-14 25-11-2017 27-11-2017 20.0 870.362
BH-15 28-11-2017 29-11-2017 20.0 869.941
BH-16 20-11-2017 22-11-2017 20.0 871.659
BH-17 16-11-2017 17-11-2017 20.0 871.362
BH-18 28-11-2017 29-11-2017 20.0 871.215
BH-19 30-11-2017 02-12-2017 20.0 870.852
BH-21 22-11-2017 25-11-2017 20.0 872.132
BH-22 25-11-2017 26-11-2017 20.0 871.924
BH-23 29-11-2017 30-11-2017 20.0 871.673
5.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT): IS 2131

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was conducted at every 1.5m interval. This test utilizes a 50 mm
OD and 600 mm long thick- walled split sampler tube driven into undisturbed soil under the
impact of 63.5 kg weight hammer having a free fall of 750 mm. The penetration resistance ‘N’
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 5
REPORT ON
value is recorded as the number of hammer blows required to achieve a penetration of 300 mm
after the initial penetration of 150 mm as a seating drive (to allow for any disturbed materials at
the bottom of borehole). After completion of test, the sampler tube is removed & disassembled
to provide a disturbed but representative sample.
In all the boreholes the SPT was conducted up to the borehole termination depth of 20m.The
typical arrangements of SPT test is shown in Fig.2.
Fig. 2 Typical representation of Standard Penetration Test
6.0 LABORATORY TESTING ON SOIL

After the completion of fieldwork, the samples were transported to SGES Lab for further testing.
The laboratory tests performed on Soil samples are summarized in Table 3.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 6
REPORT ON
Table 3 Laboratory Tests on Soil
No. Laboratory Test Reference Standard
1 Natural Moisture Content and Unit weight IS 2720 Part-2

2 Specific Gravity IS 2720 Part-3
3 Particle Size Analysis IS 2720 Part-4
4 Atterberg Limits IS 2720 Part-5
5 Unconfined Compressive Strength IS 2720 Part-10
6 Direct Shear Test IS 2720 Part-13
7 One Dimensional Consolidation Test IS 2720 Part-15
8 Chloride Content Test California Test-422
9 Organic content Test IS 2720 Part-22
10 pH of Soil IS 2720 Part-26
11 Sulphate Content IS 2720 Part-27
The Summary of Test Results (SOTR) of all the boreholes are presented in Plate 4 of Appendix-A.
6.1 Laboratory Testing Procedures on Soil
6.1.1 Natural Moisture Content and Unit Weight (IS 2720 Part-2)
The test specimen is dried for at least 24 hours in an oven at a temperature of 110 + 5°C to a
constant mass. The loss of mass due to drying is attributed to the presence of water. The water
content is calculated using the mass of water and the mass of the dry specimen.
Soil unit weights are determined for undisturbed samples (UDS) by direct measurement of sample
weight and volume. The samples are extruded from the UDS tube directly to the mould. After the
specimen is formed, trim (if necessary) the ends perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, remove the
mould, and determine the mass and dimensions of the test specimens. The height and inner
dimensions of the mould may be taken to represent specimen dimensions. Mass divided by the
volume of the specimen gives the unit weight.
6.1.2 Specific Gravity (IS 2720 Part-3)

This test method covers the determination of the specific gravity of soil solids that pass the 2mm
IS sieve, by means of using density bottle method. The test is performed by placing slurry of soil
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 7
REPORT ON
suspension in distilled water, removing the entrapped air and measuring the volume of water
displaced by the soil. Specific gravity is then determined as the ratio of the mass per weight in air
of a given volume of dry soil solids to the mass per weight of equal volume of distilled water.
6.1.3 Particle Size Analysis (IS 2720 Part-4)

This test method covers the quantitative determination of the distribution of particle sizes in soils.
The distribution of particle sizes larger than 75 µm is determined by sieving, while the distribution
of particle sizes smaller than 75 µm is determined by a sedimentation process, using a hydrometer.
Sieving is performed by arranging the various sieves one over the other in the order of their mesh
openings – the largest aperture sieve being kept at the top and the smallest aperture sieve at the
bottom. The percentage of soil retained on each sieve is calculated on the basis of the total mass
of soil sample taken and from these results, percentage passing through each sieve is calculated.
6.1.4 Atterberg Limit Test (IS 2720 Part-5)

This test methods cover the determination of the liquid limit, plastic limit, and the plasticity index of
soils that passes the 425-µ IS sieve. Liquid limit is that water content at which a part of soil, cut by a
groove of standard dimensions, will flow together for a distance of 12mm under an impact of 25
blows in a standard liquid limit apparatus. Plastic limit is that water content at which a soil will just
begin to crumble when rolled into a thread 3 mm in diameter.
6.1.5 Unconfined Compressive Strength (IS 2720 Part-10)

This test is performed to evaluate the unconfined compressive strength of the substratum. In this
test there is no application of confining pressure. An axial force is applied on the soil specimen to
produce an axial strain at a rate of 1.2 mm/min. The specimen is compressed until failure or an
axial strain of 20 percent is reached.
6.1.6 Direct Shear Test (IS 2720 Part-13)

This test method determines the consolidated drained shear strength of soil specimen under direct
shear boundary conditions. The test method consists of placing the test specimen in the direct
shear device, applying a predetermined normal stress, providing for wetting or draining of the test
specimen, or both, consolidating the specimen under the normal stress, unlocking the shear box
halves that hold the test specimen, and shearing the specimen by displacing one shear box half
laterally with respect to the other at a constant rate of shearing deformation while measuring the
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 8
REPORT ON
shearing force, relative lateral displacement, and normal displacement. Test Plots are presented in
Appendix-B.
6.1.7 One Dimensional Consolidation Test (IS 2720 Part-15)

One dimensional consolidation (Oedometer) test is performed on high quality undisturbed
cohesive samples to investigate the compressibility characteristics and stress history of the soil.
Once the sample is prepared, it is then fully saturated, loads were applied incrementally and held
for long periods. Load application is continued until the applied effective stress in the soil sample
exceeds the pre-consolidation pressure and the virgin compression curve is well characterised.
Time, applied normal load and vertical displacement readings were recorded and used to compute
the void ratio-effective vertical pressure relationship.
6.1.8 Chloride content: California Test 422
100 grams of soil sample were added in a 500ml conical flask and 300ml of distilled water is then
added and shaken with a mechanical stirrer. The mixture is then allowed to settle overnight and later
filtered. Concentrated nitric acid measuring 0.5 ml is then added to the filtered sample. Titration is
then carried out against silver nitrate solution. The volume of silver nitrate in the burette at which
precipitation occurs is recorded.
6.1.9 Organic content Test (IS 2720 Part -22)
5g of soil sample is taken from the thoroughly mixed portion of the material passing through 425μ.
10ml of the normal potassium dichromate solution is made to run from a burette.20ml of
concentrated sulphuric acid is then added carefully and the mixture is swirled and allowed to stand on
a heat insulating surface for 30min.200ml of distilled water is then added to the mixture followed by
10ml of phosphoric acid and 1ml of indicator solution, and the mixture is shaken thoroughly, 1ml of
indicator solution is added. Ferrous Sulphate solution is then added from the second burette in 0.5ml
increments, the contents of the flask being swirled, until the colour of the solution changes from blue
to green. A further 0.5ml of potassium dichromate is added changing the colour back to blue. Ferrous
Sulphate solution is then added from the burette in 0.5ml increments, the contents of the flask being
swirled, until the colour of the solution changes from blue to green after addition of a single drop.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 9
REPORT ON
6.1.10 pH of Soil (IS 2720 Part-26)

The method followed for the determination of pH value of soil suspension is based on
electrometric method. The soil sample for pH analysis is sieved on a 425µ sieve, about 30 g of the
soil specimen passing 425µ sieve is taken in a 100 ml beaker. 75 ml of distilled water is added to it.
The suspension is stirred for a few seconds. The beaker is then covered with a cover glass and
allowed to stand for one hour, with occasional stirring. It is again stirred well immediately before
testing its pH with pH electrode. The pH value of the soil suspension is recorded to the nearest
0.1 pH units.
6.1.11 Sulphate content (IS 2720 Part-27)
10g of soil is weighed for the test and 50ml of distilled water is added to it. The sample is then stirred
well and were allowed to decant. The sample is then filtered and washed on the filter paper with a
small quantity of water. 10ml of the water extract is pipetted out in a conical flask and made slightly
acidic by adding concentrated hydrochloric acid and kept for boiling. During boiling, barium chloride
solution was added from the burette till the precipitation is completed. The solution is then neutralized
with ammonium hydroxide and the excess of barium chloride against potassium chromate solution is
titrated. (N/4).The end is confirmed by using silver nitrate solution as an external indicator.
7.0 SUBSTRATUM OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION

The stratigraphy of twenty two (22) exploratory boreholes are summarized in Table-4 thru Table-
25.
Table 4 Stratigraphy of BH-01
Depth (m) Description/Stratigraphy
0.0-3.0 Medium Dense Sandy SILT
3.0-6.0 Very Dense Sandy SILT
6.0-20.0 Very Dense Silty SAND

4.5-15.0 Dense to Very Dense Sandy SILT
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 10
REPORT ON


0.0-3.0 Dense Sandy SILT


6.0-16.5 Dense to Very Dense Silty SAND


S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 11
REPORT ON


0.0-3.0 Very Dense Clayey SILT with Sand

10.5-12.0 Dense SILT



S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 12
REPORT ON


0.0-4.5 Medium Dense to Dense Sandy SILT
13.5-15.0 Very Dense Silty SAND with Gravel




0.0-4.5 Medium Dense to Very Dense Silty SAND
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 13
REPORT ON


The final borehole log (including detailed soil description and laboratory test results) are presented
in Plate 3 of Appendix-A.
8.0 EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY
8.1 General
The allowable bearing pressure of the Isolated foundation and Raft foundation are computed
based on shear and settlement criteria.
8.1.1 Bearing Capacity for Isolated Foundation (Shear Criteria)

As per IS 6403:1981 Clause 5.1.2, the ultimate bearing capacity of the given soil with respect to
shear parameters is given by
 General Shear Failure:
𝑞𝑞𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢 = 𝑐𝑐𝑁𝑁𝑐𝑐 𝑠𝑠𝑐𝑐 𝑑𝑑𝑐𝑐 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐 + 𝑞𝑞�𝑁𝑁𝑞𝑞 − 1�𝑠𝑠𝑞𝑞 𝑑𝑑𝑞𝑞 𝑖𝑖𝑞𝑞 + 0.5𝛾𝛾𝛾𝛾𝑁𝑁𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝛾𝛾 𝑖𝑖𝛾𝛾 𝑊𝑊 ′
8.1.2 Bearing Capacity of Isolated Foundation (Settlement Criteria)

𝐵𝐵 + 0.3 2
𝑞𝑞𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 = 1.4 ∗ (𝑁𝑁𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 − 3) ∗ � � ∗ 𝑅𝑅𝑊𝑊 ∗ 𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷 ∗ 𝑆𝑆𝑎𝑎
2𝐵𝐵
8.1.3 Bearing Capacity for Raft Foundation (Settlement Criteria)

𝑞𝑞𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 = 0.7 × (𝑁𝑁𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 − 3) × 𝑅𝑅𝑤𝑤 × 𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷 × 𝑆𝑆𝑎𝑎 ……….. kPa
Where, 𝑞𝑞𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 = Net allowable bearing pressure (kPa)
B = width of footing (m)
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 14
REPORT ON
D = Depth of footing in (m)

Rw = Correction factor for position of water table
CD = Depth correction factor (limited to 1.2)
𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 = SPT ‘N’ value corrected for overburden pressure
Sa = Allowable Settlement (mm)
8.1.4 Immediate Settlement Calculation14

Immediate Settlement of foundation shall be estimated using following expression:
𝒒𝒒. 𝑩𝑩′. 𝑰𝑰𝒔𝒔 . (𝟏𝟏 − 𝝁𝝁𝟐𝟐 )

𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺𝑺 = 𝐼𝐼𝑓𝑓
𝑬𝑬
Where, q = Intensity of Loading, kPa
B’ = B/2 for Centre where B is the width of foundation, m
1−2𝜇𝜇
𝐼𝐼𝑠𝑠 = 𝐼𝐼1 + 𝐼𝐼
1−𝜇𝜇 2
E = Young’s modulus of soil (kPa)

μ = Poisson’s ratio of soil
Where I1, I2 and If are the influence factors based on the size of foundation.
9.0 GROUND WATER TABLE

Groundwater table was not encountered in any of the boreholes during the period of investigation.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 Geotechnical investigation was carried at “Boeing India Engineering & Technology Centre
(BIETC)”, Devanahalli, at Bengaluru. It consists of Exploring subsurface condition by
advancing, sampling and logging twenty two (22) nos. of exploratory boreholes viz. (BH-01,
BH-02, BH-03, BH-04, BH-05, BH-06, BH-07, BH-08, BH-09, BH-10, BH-11, BH-12, BH-
13, BH-14, BH-15, BH16, BH-17, BH-18, BH-19, BH-21, BH-22 & BH-23 ).
 From the field investigation results, the substratum, in general, consists of two (2) layers i.e.
Medium Dense to Very Dense Sandy SILT up to 13 m depth, which is followed by a strata of
Very Dense Silty SAND.
 Borehole logs, SPT vs Depth plot, Stratigraphy of the location, and laboratory testing results
are presented in Appendix –A.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 15
REPORT ON
 Isolated foundation for the proposed structure shall be designed with recommended allowable
bearing pressure as given in table below for a permissible settlement of 25mm.Width of
foundation shall not be less than 1.5m.
Depth of foundation Recommended net Recommended gross

from EGL allowable bearing allowable bearing
(m) pressure (ton/m2) pressure (ton/m2)
1.5 35 38
3.5 50 56
7.0 60 73
12.0 70 90
 Recommended allowable bearing pressures and modulus of subgrade reaction for design of raft
foundation is provided in table below. Permissible settlement of 50mm is considered for the
recommendations.
Depth of Recommended net Recommended gross Subgrade

foundation allowable bearing allowable bearing pressure modulus
from EGL (m) pressure (ton/m2) (ton/m2) (t/m3)*
1.5 80 83 4500
3.5 100 107 5000
7.0 130 143 5200
12.0 150 170 5500
*Subgrade modulus values are given based on SPT co-relation as per IS: 2950.It is recommended to
confirm the values by conducting plate load test.
 The minimum horizontal distance between the foundations at same level shall be at least equal to
the width of wider footing.19
 In the case of footings at different level, the slope between lower adjacent edges of footings shall
not be steeper than one vertical two horizontal (1V:2H).19
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 16
REPORT ON
 Excavation for construction of basement shall be made with slope of 1:1. Vertical excavation
beyond 2m depth shall be made with suitable shoring system such as micropiling, touch pile etc.20
 Coefficient of active, passive and at rest pressures are indicated in below table:
Active Earth Passive Earth

Cohesion Angle of Internal Unit Weight
Depth ,m Pressure Pressure
C ,kPa Friction ɸ, degrees γ , kN/m3
Coefficient ,Ka Coefficient ,Kp
3.5 0 32 17 0.307 3.26
7.0 0 34 18 0.283 3.54
12.0 0 35 19 0.271 3.69
 Site soil can be used for backfilling purpose considering the friction angle and plasticity index
properties .Backfilling with compaction shall be carried out with minimum 95% of modified
proctor density. Adequate site grading shall be provided to ensure proper drainage.
 Chemical tests were conducted on samples at selected depths. Test results indicates the values
are within permissible limits as per IS 456.
 During site investigation no contaminated soils were encountered.
 If lateral variability of soil is observed other than reported in this report, the same shall be brought
to the notice of consultants before proceeding further construction.
 All loose soils should be removed and excavation shall be inspected for loose pockets and if any,
the same shall be replaced with lean concrete.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 17
REPORT ON
11.0 REFERENCES
1. IS 1892-1979 (Reaffirmed 2002): Code of Practice for subsurface Investigation for
foundation.
2. IS 2131-1981 (Reaffirmed 2002): Method of Standard Penetration Test for soil.
3. IS 1498-1970 (Reaffirmed 2007): Classification and identification of soils for general
engineering purpose
4. IS 2720 Part 2-1973 ((Reaffirmed 2015): Method of test for soils-Determination of water
content.
5. IS 2720 Part 3:Method of determination of Specific Gravity of fine grained soil
6. IS 2720 Part 4-1985 (Reaffirmed 2015): Method of test for soils-Grain size analysis
7. IS 2720 Part-5 (Reaffirmed-2015): Method of test for soils- Atterberg limit tests on soil
8. IS 2720 Part 11-1986 (Reaffirmed 2011): Method of test for soils- Unconsolidated Undrained
Triaxial test without measurement of pore water pressure
9. IS 2720 Part-13: Method of test for soils-Direct Shear Test
10. IS 2720 Part-15: Method of test for soils- Determination of one dimensional consolidation
properties of soil
11. IS 6403-1971: Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundation.
12. IS 8009-1976: Code of practice for calculation of settlement of foundations
13. IS 2911 Part-1 : 2010 : Design and construction of pile foundations
14. Joseph E Bowles :Foundation analysis and Design
15. District Census Handbook-Bengaluru Rural
16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengaluru_geography_and_environment
17. https://www.worldweatheronline.com/lang/en-in/v2/weather.aspx?q=blr
18. T.G. Sitaram, P. Anpazhakan: Seismic Microzonation of Bengaluru
19. IS 1904-1986: Code of Practice for design and construction of foundations in soils: General
Requirements.
20. IS 3764:1992: Code of Safety for Excavation Work
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 18
REPORT ON
12.0 DISCLAIMER
Sarathy Geotech & Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., (SGES) personnel / scientists have prepared
this report based on the available data and to the best of our knowledge and belief which stems
from the state-of-art awareness and best practices being adopted by us and the industry. The
analysis, findings and conclusions given in this report are based on the test results obtained for
samples extracted from BIETC campus site, Devanahalli, Bengaluru as specified by M/s. Boeing
India Pvt. Ltd. Any differences regarding this study/ analysis results shall be resolved within 30
days of receiving this report. Beyond the scope of our conclusion in this report, we do not claim
responsibility of any action or other conclusions derived from this report. SGES’s legal liability is
limited only to the scope of work assigned by M/s. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 19
REPORT ON
Appendix-A
i. Plate No.1 - Borehole Location Drawing
ii. Plate No.2 - Stratigraphy Drawing
iii. Plate No.3 - GINT Borelogs
iv. Plate No.4 - Summary of Test Results
v. Plate No.5 - Symbols
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.2 i
PLOT No.59 AEROSPACE- BOUNDARY POINTS
GROUND STONE TOP
CODE EASTING NORTHING
LEVEL LEVEL
P1 795236.265 1458699.690 890.010 890.195
P2 795211.366 1458660.913 888.881 889.130
P3 795180.765 1458677.900 888.874 889.146
P4 795150.491 1458694.580 888.722 888.906
P5 795119.769 1458711.351 888.958 889.070
P6 795089.051 1458728.120 888.286 888.460
P7 795058.395 1458745.013 887.998 888.129
P8 795026.351 1458762.515 888.048 888.263
P9 795047.945 1458796.183 889.258 889.454
P10 795064.682 1458822.279 889.896 889.975
P11 795083.039 1458850.899 890.234 890.420
P12 795101.933 1458880.359 890.245 890.427
P13 795120.829 1458909.820 890.780 890.955
P14 795139.725 1458939.281 891.153 891.325
P15 795158.620 1458968.742 891.791 891.978
P16 795177.516 1458998.203 892.205 892.408
P17 795196.412 1459027.665 892.613 892.792
P18 795215.307 1459057.126 893.021 893.110
P19 795234.203 1459086.586 893.404 893.651
P20 795418.087 1458983.859 894.537 894.736
P21/CW 795249.822 1459110.938 893.693
P22/CW 795295.094 1459121.786 894.595
P23/CWT 795296.108 1459121.136 894.578
P24/CW 795444.492 1459026.023 895.736
P25/CWT 795391.682 1458941.694 894.043
P26/CWT 795261.164 1458738.467 890.879
TBM LIST
TBM NO: EASTING NORTHING LEVEL
TBM1 795576.201 1458901.454 894.868
TBM2 795256.234 1458731.694 891.093
TBM-3 795442.219 1459024.110 895.705
TBM-4 795292.133 1459117.018 894.542
TBM6 795436.352 1459029.338 895.552
TBM7 795382.772 1458939.375 894.196
TBM8 795193.827 1458650.536 889.372
TBM9 795114.992 1458693.452 888.846
TBM10 795034.603 1458752.937 887.648
ALTBM1 794875.600 1458838.650 887.078
PLATE 1
FINAL BORELOG
3
Density kN/m SPT Strength Parameters
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Atterbergs limits WC %
Profile
Sample
Number of Blows UCC for Rock (MPa) RQD
Soil / Rock Description
Soil
Type
Dry Density Recovery
PL LL
(cm) UCC for Rock derived from Point Load (MPa) (%) Remarks
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Medium Dense Yellow [5Y 7/6] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 6 9 16 25
2
3 SPT-2 14 30 41 71
Very Dense Yellow [5Y 7/6] Sandy SILT
4 Colour changes from Yellow to Red
SPT-3 24 50/11cm - R
5
Colour changes from Red to Pink
6 SPT-4 30 50/13cm - R Cohesion(kPa)=8
Very Dense Light brown [7.5YR 6/3] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=35
7
SPT-5 48 50/7cm - R
8
9 SPT-6 50/13cm - - R
10
SPT-7 50/13cm - - R
11
12 SPT-8 50/14cm - - R
13
SPT-9 50/13cm - - R
14
15 SPT-10 48 50/10cm - R
16
Checked by: MKP Date: 25-11-2017
SPT-11 50/10cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 50/14cm - - R
19
SPT-13 50/14cm - - R
20 SPT-14 47 50/8cm - R
Borehole Terminated at 20.0m
21
22
Originator: PR Date: 25-11-2017
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Client : Boeing India Pvt.Ltd. Date of Boring : 17-11-17 to 21-11-17 Percent passing 75 micron sieve (%) R- Refusal Point Load Index, (MPa)
Project : BIETC Borehole : BH-01 Legend
Coordinates:
Location : Bengaluru Water Table(m) : NIL SPT: Standard Penetration Test
X 1,458,691.70
Report No. : S-1270 FINAL UDS: Undisturbed Sample
Status : Y 795,194.88 RC: Rock Core
Plate 3A
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Medium Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 8 12 19 31
2
3 SPT-2 8 8 9 17
4
SPT-3 11 20 28 48 Cohesion(kPa)=5
5 Dense to Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT Angle of internal friction(Deg)=34
6 SPT-4 15 27 31 58
7
SPT-5 34 40 44 84
8
9 SPT-6 23 50/14cm - R
10
SPT-7 48 50/12cm - R
11
12 SPT-8 39 47 50/14cm R
13
SPT-9 42 52 - R
14
15 SPT-10 37 50/13cm - R
Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 5/3] Silty SAND
16
SPT-11 13 50/10cm - R
17
18 SPT-12 39 50/13cm - R
19
24 50/14cm - R
SPT-13
20 SPT-14 24 35 46 81
21 Borehole Terminated at 20.0m
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,710.79
Plate 3B
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 10 12 14 26
2
3 SPT-2 12 24 50/14cm R
Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT
4
SPT-3 26 50/15cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=2
5 Angle of internal friction(Deg)=34
6 SPT-4 40 50/12cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=8
Angle of internal friction(Deg)=34
7
SPT-5 50/12cm - - R
8
9 SPT-6 50/14cm - - R
10
SPT-7 50/11cm - - R
11
12 SPT-8 50/9cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=5
13
SPT-9 50/7cm - - R
14
15 SPT-10 50/10cm - - R
16
SPT-11 50/12cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 50/11cm - - R
19
SPT-13 30 50/13cm - R
20 SPT-14 44 50/10cm - R
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,730.60
Plate 3C
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 13 18 25 43
2
3 SPT-2 22 34 50/12cm R
4
SPT-3 34 48 34 82
5
6 SPT-4 34 50/12cm - R
7
SPT-5 50/13cm - - R
8
9 SPT-6 50/14cm - - R Cohesion(kPa)=5

Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 5/3] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=36
10
SPT-7 50/13cm - - R
11
12 SPT-8 50/9cm - - R
13
SPT-9 50/12cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=6
15 SPT-10 50/11cm - - R
16
SPT-11 50/13cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 50/14cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=9
19
SPT-13 44 50/9cm - R
20 SPT-14 50/5cm - - R
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,749.88
Plate 3D
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 9 17 20 37
2
3 SPT-2 8 18 22 40
Cohesion(kPa)=5
4
SPT-3 8 13 21 34
5
6 SPT-4 6 14 25 39
7
SPT-5 14 25 35 60
8 Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT
9 SPT-6 13 25 36 61
Cohesion(kPa)=2
10
SPT-7 35 50/9cm - R
11 Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 5/3] Silty SAND
12 SPT-8 23 50/12cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=5
13
SPT-9 26 50/12cm - R
14
15 SPT-10 50/14cm - - R
16
SPT-11 50/15cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 50/15cm - - R
19
SPT-13 18 50/10cm - R
20 SPT-14 26 50/10cm - R
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,770.63
Plate 3E
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Medium Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 4 8 8 16
2
3 SPT-2 9 11 16 27
4
SPT-3 11 18 23 41
5
6 SPT-4 25 27 35 62
Dense to Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Silty SAND
7
SPT-5 22 37 51 88
Cohesion(kPa)=10
9 SPT-6 30 37 42 79
10
SPT-7 17 30 32 62
11
12 SPT-8 15 23 32 55
13
SPT-9 8 20 25 45
14
15 SPT-10 12 22 32 54
16
SPT-11 50/14cm - - 54 Cohesion(kPa)=8

17 Very Dense Light gray [5Y 7/1] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=34
18 SPT-12 50/13cm - - 54
19
SPT-13 27 50/11cm - 54
20 SPT-14 50/10cm - - 54
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,723.90
Plate 3F
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 5 8 12 20
2
3 SPT-2 20 40 41 81
4
SPT-3 25 28 40 68
5
6 SPT-4 32 33 33 66
7
SPT-5 17 27 48 75
8
9 SPT-6 45 46 50/11cm R
10
11 Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 5/3] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=33
12 SPT-8 38 50/15cm - R
13
SPT-9 14 30 48 78
14
15 SPT-10 16 44 50/13cm R
16
SPT-11 28 36 50/10cm R
17
18 SPT-12 33 49 36 85
19
SPT-13 42 50/10cm - R
20 SPT-14 29 50/11cm - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,746.17
Plate 3G
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 11 16 16 32
2
3 SPT-2 10 16 18 34
4
SPT-3 10 21 29 50
5 Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT
6 SPT-4 24 50/12cm - R
7
SPT-5 23 48 50/12cm R
8
9 SPT-6 29 50/12cm - R
10
SPT-7 28 50/13cm - R
11

Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=40
13
SPT-9 32 35 - R
14
15 SPT-10 34 45 - R
16
SPT-11 50/14cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 24 37 37 74
19
SPT-13 41 50/13cm - R
20 SPT-14 32 50/14cm - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,763.87
Plate 3H
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 30 35 41 76
2
3 SPT-2 41 47 50/11cm R
4
SPT-3
37 50/10cm - R Cohesion(kPa)=5
5 Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=35
6 SPT-4 50/14cm - - R
7
SPT-5 50/14cm - - R
8

Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Sandy SILT Angle of internal friction(Deg)=36
10
SPT-7 50/10cm - - R
11
12 SPT-8 50/11cm - - R
13
SPT-9 50/11cm - - R Cohesion(kPa)=10
14 Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=33
15 SPT-10 50/9cm - - R
16
SPT-11 50/12cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 38 50/14cm - R
19
SPT-13 50/13cm - - R
20 SPT-14 50/11cm - - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,784.05
Plate 3I
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Clayey SILT with Sand

1
SPT-1 20 32 50/11cm R
2
3 SPT-2 15 22 50/13cm R
Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Sandy SILT
4
SPT-3 11 19 24 43
Cohesion(kPa)=5
6 SPT-4 15 33 32 65
7
SPT-5 37 50/9cm - R
8
9 SPT-6 24 50/6cm - R
10
SPT-7 25 50/8cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=6
12 SPT-8 16 50/12cm - R
13
SPT-9 16 50/14cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=10
15 SPT-10 50/14cm - - R
16
SPT-11 50/13cm - - R
17 Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Silty SAND
18 SPT-12 15 48 50/9cm R
19
SPT-13 50/11cm - - R
20 SPT-14 22 50/8cm - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,803.60
Plate 3J
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 7 11 11 22
2
3 SPT-2 9 11 16 27
4
SPT-3 18 21 31 52
5 Very Dense Reddish brown [5YR 5/4] Sandy SILT
6 SPT-4 17 28 39 67
7
SPT-5 23 35 53 88
8
9 SPT-6 17 36 51 87
10
SPT-7 11 17 18 35
11 Dense Brown [7.5YR 5/4] SILT
12 SPT-8 25 50/15cm - R
13
SPT-9 27 50/13cm - R
14
15 SPT-10 20 50/14cm - R
16
SPT-11 14 41 50/13cm R
Cohesion(kPa)=10
18 SPT-12 27 44 50/12cm R
19
SPT-13 27 49 50/11cm R
20 SPT-14 8 17 30 47
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,757.93
Plate 3K
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Dense to Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 11 26 27 53
2
3 SPT-2 9 20 24 44
Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Sandy SILT
4
SPT-3 17 30 36 66
5
6 SPT-4 17 24 27 51
7
SPT-5 18 28 53 81
8
9 SPT-6 24 35 50/14cm R Cohesion(kPa)=6

Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=38
10
SPT-7 28 48 50/12cm R
11
12 SPT-8 25 30 50/12cm R
13
SPT-9 41 50/11cm - R
14
15 SPT-10 33 50/13cm - R
16
SPT-11 25 29 43 72
17
18 SPT-12 22 42 50/13cm R
19
SPT-13 29 48 50/9cm R
20 SPT-14 22 50/13cm - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,778.78
Plate 3L
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Medium Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 8 12 15 27
2
3 SPT-2 11 23 28 51
4
SPT-3 14 34 53 R
5
6 SPT-4 17 35 52 R
7
SPT-5 20 34 34 68
8
9 SPT-6 18 30 41 71
Cohesion(kPa)=5
10
SPT-7 21 49 50/12cm R
11
12 SPT-8 31 50/13cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=10
13
SPT-9 35 50/9cm - R
14 Very Dense Gray [7.5YR 5/1] Silty SAND
15 SPT-10 25 50/13cm - R
16
SPT-11 26 50/13cm - R
17
18 SPT-12 32 50/13cm - R
19
SPT-13 26 53 - R
20 SPT-14 23 42 50/14cm R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,798.23
Plate 3M
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 8 14 21 35
2
3 SPT-2 18 50/13cm - R
4
SPT-3
24 50/10cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=5
6 SPT-4 21 50/11cm - R
7
SPT-5 18 50/9cm - R
8
9 SPT-6 50/7cm - - R
10
SPT-7 50/15cm - - R
11
12 SPT-8 50/12cm - - R
13
SPT-9 50/12cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=10
15 SPT-10 25 50/3cm - R
16
SPT-11 50/12cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 50/9cm - - R
19
SPT-13 50/9cm - - R
20 SPT-14 50/8cm - - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,817.49
Plate 3N
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Silty SAND

1
SPT-1 50/8cm - - R
2
3 SPT-2 50/10cm - - R
4
SPT-3 50/7cm - - R
5
6 SPT-4 50/10cm - - R
Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Sandy SILT
7
SPT-5 50/11cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=5
9 SPT-6 50/9cm - - R
10
SPT-7 23 50/10cm - R
11
12 SPT-8 50 - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=5
13
SPT-9 50/13cm - - R
14
15 SPT-10 30 50/8cm - R
16
SPT-11 50/11cm - - R
17
18 SPT-12 50/11cm - - R
19
SPT-13 50/12cm - - R
20 SPT-14 50/8cm - - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,837.30
Plate 3O
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Medium Dense to Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 10 12 15 27
2
3 SPT-2 11 16 29 45
4
SPT-3 13 25 33 55
Cohesion(kPa)=10
5 Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Sandy SILT Angle of internal friction(Deg)=33
6 SPT-4 18 28 28 56
7
SPT-5 17 24 30 54
8
9 SPT-6 21 27 39 56
10
SPT-7 17 23 39 62
11
12 SPT-8 18 30 39 69
13
14 Very Dense Brown [7.5YR 4/2] Silty SAND with gravel Angle of internal friction(Deg)=32
15 SPT-10 21 31 39 70
16
SPT-11 20 36 50/12cm R
17
18 SPT-12 50/3cm - - R
19
SPT-13 50/4cm - - R
20 SPT-14 50/4cm - - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,791.60
Plate 3P
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 9 12 16 28
2
3 SPT-2 9 20 35 55
Very Dense Gray [2.5Y 5/1] Sandy SILT
4
SPT-3 14 19 31 50
5
6 SPT-4 16 29 47 76
7
SPT-5 18 32 50/13cm R
Cohesion(kPa)=10
9 SPT-6 14 27 39 66
10
SPT-7 12 30 44 74
11
12 SPT-8 13 30 34 64
Cohesion(kPa)=8
13
SPT-9 14 25 39 64
14
15 SPT-10 24 50/14cm - R
Very Dense Gray [2.5Y 5/1] Silty SAND
16
SPT-11 26 50/14cm - R
17
18 SPT-12 27 50/15cm - R
19
23 50/13cm - R
SPT-13
20 SPT-14 43 50/11cm - R

21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,811.53
Plate 3Q
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 13 21 33 54
2
3 SPT-2 29 50/11cm - R
Very Dense Gray [2.5Y 5/1] Silty SAND
4
SPT-3 51/15cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=8
6 SPT-4 47 50/10cm - R
7
SPT-5 50/12cm - - R
8 Very Dense Gray [2.5Y 5/1] Sandy SILT
9 SPT-6 50/11cm - - R
10
SPT-7 50/12cm - - R
11
12 SPT-8 50/13cm - - R
13
SPT-9 50/11cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=10
15 SPT-10 50/9cm - - R
16
SPT-11 50/13cm - - R
17 Very Dense Gray [2.5Y 5/1] Silty SAND
18 SPT-12 50/12cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=8
19
SPT-13 50/8cm - - R
20 SPT-14 50/10cm - - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,839.02
Plate 3R
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 29 50/14cm - R
2
3 SPT-2 34 50/11cm - R
4
SPT-3 35 50/12cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=2
6 SPT-4 46 50/8cm - R
7
SPT-5 50/12cm - - R
Cohesion(kPa)=4
9 SPT-6 50/13cm - - R
10
SPT-7 50/8cm - - R
11

Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=35
13
SPT-9 15 44 46 90
14
15 SPT-10 21 50 - R
16
SPT-11 40 50/14cm - R
17
18 SPT-12 50/14cm - - R
19
SPT-13 47 50/11cm - R
20 SPT-14 50/14cm - - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,850.25
Plate 3S
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Medium Dense to Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Silty SAND

1
SPT-1 7 10 15 25
2
3 SPT-2 6 14 34 48
Cohesion(kPa)=8
4
SPT-3 10 22 26 48
5 Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT
6 SPT-4 13 21 27 48
7
8 Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Sandy SILT Angle of internal friction(Deg)=35
9 SPT-6 20 33 42 75
10
SPT-7 17 29 41 70
11
12 SPT-8 21 28 35 63
13
SPT-9 27 50/14cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=5
15 SPT-10 50/12cm - - R
16
SPT-11 44 50/11cm - R
17
18 SPT-12 20 38 47 85
19
SPT-13 15 46 50/5cm R
20 SPT-14 43 50/5cm - R
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,831.28
Plate 3T
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20

1
SPT-1 10 16 20 36
2
3 SPT-2 12 16 26 42
4
SPT-3 12 22 30 52
5 Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Sandy SILT
6 SPT-4 11 16 23 39
Cohesion(kPa)=3
7
SPT-5 9 15 22 37
8 Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Silty SAND
9 SPT-6 9 11 15 26
10
SPT-7 14 31 44 75
11
12 SPT-8 20 34 50/15cm R
Cohesion(kPa)=4
13
SPT-9 31 44 50/11cm R
14
15 SPT-10 45 50/10cm - R
Cohesion(kPa)=15
16
SPT-11 40 50/11cm - R
17
18 SPT-12 21 50/13cm - R
19
3 32 50/13cm R
SPT-13
20 SPT-14 29 43 50/14cm R

21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,846.33
Plate 3U
FINAL BORELOG
3
Run (m) Core
N-Value
Depth
Profile
Sample
Soil
Type
PL LL
Bulk Density 20 40
W
60 80 15 30 40 80 120 160
from to (%)
(m) 5 10 15 20
Dense to Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Sandy SILT

1
SPT-1 6 15 19 34
2
3 SPT-2 11 18 40 58
Very Dense Red [2.5YR 5/6] Silty SAND
4
SPT-3 3 12 28 40
5 Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Sandy SILT
6 SPT-4 18 32 43 75
7
SPT-5 23 38 46 84
8
9 SPT-6 21 33 36 69
10
11 Very Dense Light gray [5YR 7/1] Silty SAND Angle of internal friction(Deg)=35
12 SPT-8 21 29 44 73
13
SPT-9 18 36 49 85
14
15 SPT-10 17 29 45 74
16
SPT-11 18 31 43 74
Cohesion(kPa)=3
18 SPT-12 39 50/7cm - R
19
SPT-13 44 50/7cm - R Cohesion(kPa)=7
20 SPT-14 22 50/5cm - R Angle of internal friction(Deg)=35
21
22
23
24
25
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40
Coordinates:
X 1,458,864.72
Plate 3V
SOIL & ROCK TESTING LABORATORY
SARATHY GEOTECH & ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
SOIL PARAMETERS
SHEAR
CLASSIFICATION & INDEX STRENGTH
TEST
*
Unconfined
Compressi
IS: 2720-Part 3, Section 1 :1980, RA 2011

ve Strength
Hydrometer * Direct Shear
IS 2720 -
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015

Grain Size Distribution Analysis Test
IS 2720 - 2 :1973, RA 2015

Part
IS: 2720 -Part 4:1985, IS: 2720 - Part 4 10:1991 IS 2720 - Part
Plasticity Index (%)

Water Content (%)
Sample ID Sample Description RA 2015 :1985 13:1986
Plastic Limit (%)

Liquid Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
(RA - 2010)
(RA - 2015) (RA - 2011)
Angle of internal
Cohesion kPa
Strength kPa
% passing 75
Compressive
Unconfined
friction Ф
micron
Gravel
Sand
Clay
Silt
%
%
S1270/BH01/1.5 Sandy SILT   20 26
S1270/BH01/3.0 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH01/6.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH01/10.5 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH01/15.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH02/1.5 Sandy SILT   

S1270/BH02/4.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH02/6.0 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH02/13.5 Sandy SILT   29 24
S1270/BH02/18.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH06/1.5 Sandy SILT   

S1270/BH06/4.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH06/6.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH06/7.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH06/9.0 Sandy SILT  N/P
S1270/BH06/16.5 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH06/18.0 Silty SAND      
Note: Tests marked * are Non NABL
Prepared By Checked By Approved By

PRB MHK MS
Plate 4A
SOIL PARAMETERS
SHEAR Consolidation
CLASSIFICATION & INDEX * Unconfined *Chemical Test STRENGTH IS: 2720-Part
Compressive TEST 15:1986 (RA - 2011)
Strength
Hydrometer * Direct Shear
Pre Consolidation Pressure (kPa)

IS: 2720-Part 3, Section 1 :1980,
IS 2720 - Part
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015

Grain Size Distribution Analysis Test
IS 2720 - 2 :1973, RA 2015

10:1991
Cc
IS: 2720 -Part 4:1985, IS: 2720 - Part 4 IS 2720 - Part
(RA - 2010)

Water Content (%)
RA 2015 :1985 13:1986
Liquid Limit (%)

Sample ID Sample Description
Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Organic Matter
Compression Index
(RA - 2015) (RA - 2011)
( by percent)
(% by mass)
Sulphate
Chloride
RA 2011
(mg/lit)
Angle of internal
Cohesion kPa
Strength kPa
% passing 75
Compressive
Unconfined
friction Ф
micron
Gravel
Sand
Clay
Silt
%
%
S1270/BH07/3.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH07/4.5 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH07/6.0 Sandy SILT   20 16
S1270/BH07/10.5 Silty SAND      
S1270/BH07/15.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH08/1.5 Sandy SILT    

S1270/BH08/3.0 Sandy SILT   25 23  
S1270/BH08/6.0 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH08/12.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH11/1.5 Sandy SILT   19 19

S1270/BH11/3.0 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH11/4.5 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH11/10.5 SILT   
S1270/BH11/16.5 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH12/1.5 Sandy SILT      

S1270/BH12/3.0 Sandy SILT   20 15
S1270/BH12/4.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH12/6.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH12/7.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH12/9.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH12/12.0 Silty SAND   

PRB MHK MS
Plate 4B

SOIL PARAMETERS
Consolidation
SHEAR STRENGTH
CLASSIFICATION & INDEX *Chemical Test IS: 2720-Part 15:1986
TEST
(RA - 2011)
Grain Size Distribution Hydrometer Analysis * Direct Shear Test
IS: 2720-Part 3, Section 1 :1980, RA
Pre Consolidation Pressure (kPa)

IS: 2720 -Part 4:1985, IS: 2720 - Part 4 :1985 IS 2720 - Part 13:1986
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015

IS 2720 - 2 :1973, RA 2015
RA 2015 (RA - 2015) (RA - 2011)
Cc
Water Content (%)
Plastic Limit (%)

Liquid Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Organic Matter
Angle of internal friction Ф
Compression Index
( by percent)
(% by mass)
Sulphate
Chloride
(mg/lit)
2011
Cohesion kPa
% passing 75
micron
Gravel
Sand
Clay
Silt
%
%
S1270/BH13/1.5 Sandy SILT   24 26
S1270/BH13/3.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH13/9.0 Sandy SILT        
S1270/BH13/12.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH13/15.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH16/1.5 Sandy SILT   20 16
S1270/BH16/3.0 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH16/4.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH16/7.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH16/13.5 Sandy SILT with Gravel   
S1270/BH17/3.0 Sandy SILT       
S1270/BH17/4.5 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH17/6.0 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH17/7.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH17/10.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH17/12.0 Sandy SILT   
PRB MHK MS
Plate 4C
SOIL PARAMETERS
SHEAR STRENGTH
CLASSIFICATION & INDEX *Chemical Test
TEST
Hydrometer

Grain Size Distribution Analysis * Direct Shear Test
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015

IS: 2720 -Part 4:1985, IS: 2720 - Part 4 IS 2720 - Part 13:1986
IS 2720 - 2 :1973, RA 2015

RA 2015 :1985 (RA - 2011)

Water Content (%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Sample ID Sample Description (RA - 2015)
Organic Matter
( by percent)
(% by mass)
Sulphate
PH Value
Chloride
Angle of internal friction

(mg/lit)
2011
Cohesion kPa
% passing 75
micron
Gravel
Sand
Clay
Silt
%
%
%
Ф
S1270/BH03/3.0 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH03/4.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH03/7.5 Sandy SILT   N/P  
S1270/BH03/9.0 Silty SAND       
S1270/BH03/12.0 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH03/15.0 Silty SAND 
S1270/BH04/3.0 Sandy SILT   

S1270/BH04/9.0 Silty SAND      
S1270/BH04/12.0 Silty SAND   N/P
S1270/BH04/13.5 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH04/15.0 Silty SAND      
S1270/BH04/16.5 Silty SAND  N/P
S1270/BH04/18.0 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH05/1.5 Sandy SILT      

S1270/BH05/3.0 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH05/4.5 Sandy SILT   N/P
S1270/BH05/7.5 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH05/9.0 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH05/12.0 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH05/15.0 Silty SAND  N/P
S1270/BH05/16.5 Silty SAND   

PRB MHK MS
Plate 4D
SOIL PARAMETERS
SHEAR STRENGTH
TEST
Hydrometer

IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015

IS 2720 - 2 :1973, RA 2015

RA 2015 :1985 (RA - 2011)

Water Content (%)
(RA - 2015)
Liquid Limit (%)
Plastic Limit (%)

Specific Gravity
Organic Matter
( by percent)
(% by mass)
PH Value
Sulphate
Chloride

(mg/lit)
2011
Cohesion kPa
% passing 75
micron
Gravel
Sand
Clay
Silt
%
Ф
S1270/BH09/1.5 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH09/3.0 Sandy SILT   N/P
S1270/BH09/4.5 Silty SAND     
S1270/BH09/9.0 Sandy SILT     
S1270/BH09/13.5 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH09/16.5 Silty SAND   N/P
S1270/BH10/1.5 Clayey SILT with Sand      

S1270/BH10/4.5 Sandy SILT   N/P  
S1270/BH10/6.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH10/10.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH10/12.0 Sandy SILT  N/P    
S1270/BH10/13.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH10/16.5 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH14/3.0 Sandy SILT   N/P

S1270/BH14/4.5 Sandy SILT        
S1270/BH14/10.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH14/12.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH14/13.5 Sandy SILT  

PRB MHK MS
PLATE-4E
SOIL PARAMETERS
SHEAR
STRENGTH TEST
Hydrometer

IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015

IS 2720 - 2 :1973, RA 2015
RA 2015 :1985 (RA - 2011)

Water Content (%)
Plastic Limit (%)

Liquid Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Organic Matter
( by percent)
(% by mass)

PH Value
Sulphate
Chloride
(mg/lit)
2011
Cohesion kPa
% passing 75
micron
Gravel
Sand
Clay
Silt
%
%
Ф
S1270/BH15/3.0 Silty SAND      
S1270/BH15/7.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH15/9.0 Sandy SILT   N/P
S1270/BH15/12.0 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH15/13.5 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH15/16.5 Sandy SILT      
S1270/BH15/19.5 Sandy SILT   N/P
S1270/BH18/1.5 Sandy SILT   

S1270/BH18/4.5 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH18/7.5 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH18/13.5 Sandy SILT   N/P       
S1270/BH18/16.5 Silty SAND      
S1270/BH18/18.0 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH19/3.0 Sandy SILT   

S1270/BH19/4.5 Sandy SILT   N/P  
S1270/BH19/7.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH19/12.0 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH19/13.5 Silty SAND      
S1270/BH19/18.0 Silty SAND   

PRB MHK MS
Plate 4F
SOIL PARAMETERS
SHEAR
STRENGTH TEST
Hydrometer

IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015
IS: 2720-Part 5:1985, RA 2015

IS 2720 - 2 :1973, RA 2015
RA 2015 :1985 (RA - 2011)

Water Content (%)
Plastic Limit (%)

Liquid Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Organic Matter
( by percent)
(% by mass)

PH Value
Sulphate
Chloride
(mg/lit)
2011
Cohesion kPa
% passing 75
micron
Gravel
Sand
Clay
Silt
%
%
Ф
S1270/BH21/3.0 Silty SAND         
S1270/BH21/7.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH21/12.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH21/13.5 Sandy SILT  
S1270/BH21/15.0 Sandy SILT   N/P
S1270/BH21/18.0 Sandy SILT    
S1270/BH22/3.0 Sandy SILT   N/P

S1270/BH22/6.0 Sandy SILT        
S1270/BH22/9.0 Sandy SILT   
S1270/BH22/12.0 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH22/15.0 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH23/1.5 Sandy SILT   N/P

S1270/BH23/3.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH23/6.0 Sandy SILT   N/P
S1270/BH23/9.0 Sandy SILT          
S1270/BH23/10.5 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH23/16.5 Silty SAND  
S1270/BH23/18.0 Silty SAND   
S1270/BH23/19.5 Silty SAND  

PRB MHK MS
Plate 4G
SARATHY GEOTECH & ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT LTD
TERMS AND SYMBOLS USED ON LOGS

SOIL TYPES
Sand Silt Gravel
Weathered/disin +++
Fill
Clay
tegrated rock + + Rock
SAMPLER TYPE
Thin-Walled Tube Split-Barrel No-Recovery
STRENGTH OF COHESIVE SOIL RELATIVE DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOIL

ASTM Estimated Estimated SPT
Undrained Shear Strength Natural Relative N
Consistency (kN/m2) (ksf) Density Density Value
Very soft < 12.5 < 0.25 Very loose 0.00 to 0.15 0 to 4
Soft 12.5 to 25 0.25 to 0.5 Loose 0.15 to 0.35 4 to 10
Firm 25 to 50 0.5 to 1.0 Medium dense 0.35 to 0.65 10 to 30
Stiff 50 to 100 1.0 to 2.0 Dense 0.65 to 0.85 30 to 50
Very stiff 100 to 200 2.0 to 4.0 Very dense 0.85 to 1.00 > 50
Hard > 200 > 4.0
SOIL GRAIN SIZE
B.I.S. STANDARD
GRAVEL SAND SILT
COBBLES CLAY
COARSE MEDIUM FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
60 20 6 2 0.6 0.2 0.06 0.02 0.006 0.002
SOIL GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
ASTM STANDARD
U.S. STANDARD SIEVE
3" 3/4" 4 10 40 200
GRAVEL SAND
COBBLES SILT OR CLAY
COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
75 19 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075
SOIL GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
SECONDARY CONSTITUENTS
ASTM D 2487-93 BS 5930 : 1981
Traces Particles are present but estimated to be less than 5% w/occasional less than 5%
Few 5 to 10% of particles present with 5 to 20%
Little 15 to 25% of particles present w/some 20 to 35%
Some 30 to 45% of particles present sandy/gravelly 35 to 65%
SOIL STRUCTURE
Slickensided Having planes of weakness that appear slick and glossy.
Fissured Containing shrinkage or relief cracks, often filled with fine sand or silt; usually more or less vertical.
Pocket Inclusion of material of different texture that is smaller than the diameter of the sample.
Parting Inclusion less than 3 mm (1/8 inch) thick extending through the sample.
Seam Inclusion 3 mm (1/8 inch) to 76 mm (3 inches) thick extending through the sample.
Layer Inclusion greater than 76 mm (3 inches) thick extending through the sample.
Laminated Soil sample composed of alternating partings of seams of different soil type.
Interlayered Soil sample composed of alternating layers of different soil type.
Intermixed Soil sample composed of pockets of different soil type and layered or laminated structure is not evident.
Calcareous Composed of 12 to 50% material which is soluble in dilute hydrochloric acid.
Carbonate Composed of more than 50% material which is soluble in dilute hydrocholoric acid.
Well Cemented Sample can not be manually broken down but individual grains can be dislodged.
Slightly Cemented Sample can be broken down manually without difficulty and individual grains can be dislodged.
Moderately Cemented Intermediate between slightly and well cemented.
Coralline Composed predominantly of recognizable and intact coral pieces and fragments.
Shelly Composed predominantly of recognizable and intact shell pieces and fragments.
Report No.:S-1270 Plate No.5

REPORT ON
Appendix-B
i. Sample Calculation for SBC
ii. SPT v/s Depth Plots
iii. Laboratory Test Plots
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 ii
REPORT ON
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR BEARING CAPACITY:

The allowable bearing pressure of the Isolated footing and Raft foundation are computed based
on the IS 6403-1981 and Teng’s equation.
At 3.5m Depth
 The ultimate net bearing pressure for Isolated Foundation (Shear Criteria) as per IS 6403:1981
Clause 5.1.2
1 0.5
Where, = Net ultimate bearing capacity
, , = Bearing capacity factors obtained from table 1 of IS 6403
, and = Obtained from IS 6403:1981 Clause 5.1.2.1
C-Cohesion = 0 and ∅ - Angle of internal friction = 32°
After interpolation, bearing capacity factors and shape factors obtained are:
= 36.53, = 24.36, = 32.65
= 1.3, = 1.2, = 0.8
, , =1
= 1.14, & = 1.07
Width of foundation B = 1.5m, Unit weight γ =18 kN/m3
=0 3.5 18 24.36 1 1.2 1.07 1 0.5 18 1.5 32.65 0.8 1.07 1
= 2266.94 kN/m2 = 226.69 t/m2
Considering factor of safety of 2.5 .
= 906.78 kN/m2 = 90.67 t/m2
 Allowable Bearing Capacity for Isolated Foundation (Settlement Criteria) at a depth of 3.5 m:
0.3
1.4 ∗ 3 ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
2
Where
= Allowable bearing pressure (kPa)
B = width of footing (m)
D = Depth of footing in (m)
Rw = correction factor for position of water table
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-001
REPORT ON
CD = Depth correction factor

= SPT ‘N’ value corrected for overburden pressure
Sa = Allowable Settlement
1.5 0.3
1.4 ∗ 50 3 ∗ ∗ 1 ∗ 1.2 ∗ 25
2 ∗ 1.5
71.06
Recommended allowable bearing capacity for isolated foundation is 50 t/m2 at 3.5 m depth.
 Bearing Capacity for Raft Foundation (Settlement Criteria) at a depth of 3.5 m:

0.7 3 ………..kPa
0.7 50 3 1 1.2 50
197.4
Recommended allowable bearing capacity for raft foundation is 100 t/m2 at 3.5 m depth.
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-002
REPORT ON
ii SPT v/s Depth Plots
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-003
REPORT ON
CAMPUS PROJECT, DEVANAHALLI , BANGALORE
Plot 1 Depth versus SPT Curve for BH-01
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-004
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-005
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-006
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-007
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-008
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-009
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-010
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-011
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-012
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-013
REPORT ON
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-014
REPORT ON
ii Laboratory Test Plots
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver.3 B-015
TEST REPORT
Test Method : Grain Size Analysis
Testing Standard : IS 2720 - Part IV:1985 (Reaffirmed 2015)
Date of Testing : 27/11/17
Sample Identification : S1270/BH01/3.0
Sample Description : Sandy SILT
Particle Size Distribution Curve

FINES SAND GRAVEL
Clay Size Silt Size Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse
100
90
80
70
Percentage Finer (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 14
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 71
Tested By Checked By Approved By
PRB MHK MS
B-016
TEST REPORT
Sample Description : Silty SAND

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 10
Medium Sand % 26
Fine Sand % 14
Fines % 49
PRB MHK MS
B-017
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 9
Medium Sand % 31
Fine Sand % 16
Fines % 44
PRB MHK MS
B-018
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 4
Coarse Sand % 8
Medium Sand % 22
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 55
PRB MHK MS
B-019
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 12
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-020
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 35
Fine Sand % 14
Fines % 49
PRB MHK MS
B-021
TEST REPORT
Date of Testing : 12-Dec-17

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 26
Fine Sand % 9
Fines % 59
PRB MHK MS
B-022
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 34
Fine Sand % 17
Fines % 44
PRB MHK MS
B-023
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 32
Fine Sand % 10
Fines % 52
PRB MHK MS
B-024
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 13
Medium Sand % 34
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 40
PRB MHK MS
B-025
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 20
Fine Sand % 10
Fines % 64
PRB MHK MS
B-026
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 55
PRB MHK MS
B-027
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 12
Medium Sand % 35
Fine Sand % 12
Fines % 41
PRB MHK MS
B-028
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 5
Coarse Sand % 10
Medium Sand % 20
Fine Sand % 10
Fines % 55
PRB MHK MS
B-029
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 28
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-030
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 17
Medium Sand % 38
Fine Sand % 14
Fines % 30
PRB MHK MS
B-031
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 3
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 15
Fines % 52
PRB MHK MS
B-032
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 8
Medium Sand % 31
Fine Sand % 15
Fines % 46
PRB MHK MS
B-033
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 38
Fine Sand % 16
Fines % 40
PRB MHK MS
B-034
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 7
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 51
PRB MHK MS
B-035
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 26
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 57
PRB MHK MS
B-036
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 2
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 18
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 63
PRB MHK MS
B-037
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 8
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 19
Fines % 43
PRB MHK MS
B-038
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 7
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 51
PRB MHK MS
B-039
TEST REPORT
Sample Description : Clayey SAND with Sand

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 2
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 11
Fine Sand % 7
Fines % 75
PRB MHK MS
B-040
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 12
Fines % 55
PRB MHK MS
B-041
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 9
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 15
Fines % 46
PRB MHK MS
B-042
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 3
Medium Sand % 22
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 63
PRB MHK MS
B-043
TEST REPORT
Sample Description : SILT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 0
Medium Sand % 1
Fine Sand % 4
Fines % 95
PRB MHK MS
B-044
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 3
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 56
PRB MHK MS
B-045
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 23
Fine Sand % 10
Fines % 63
PRB MHK MS
B-046
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 7
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 9
Fines % 54
PRB MHK MS
B-047
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 20
Fines % 49
PRB MHK MS
B-048
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 26
Fine Sand % 10
Fines % 60
PRB MHK MS
B-049
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 55
PRB MHK MS
B-050
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 3
Medium Sand % 33
Fine Sand % 19
Fines % 45
PRB MHK MS
B-051
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 6
Coarse Sand % 10
Medium Sand % 23
Fine Sand % 8
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-052
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 10
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 7
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-053
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 10
Medium Sand % 32
Fine Sand % 7
Fines % 51
PRB MHK MS
B-054
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 13
Coarse Sand % 19
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 14
Fines % 25
PRB MHK MS
B-055
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 33
Fine Sand % 9
Fines % 54
PRB MHK MS
B-056
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-057
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 25
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 56
PRB MHK MS
B-058
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 31
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 56
PRB MHK MS
B-059
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 25
Fine Sand % 12
Fines % 57
PRB MHK MS
B-060
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 31
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-061
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 9
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 9
Fines % 52
PRB MHK MS
B-062
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 1
Medium Sand % 23
Fine Sand % 15
Fines % 61
PRB MHK MS
B-063
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 33
Fine Sand % 12
Fines % 51
PRB MHK MS
B-064
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 1
Medium Sand % 33
Fine Sand % 18
Fines % 48
PRB MHK MS
B-065
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 1
Medium Sand % 24
Fine Sand % 14
Fines % 61
PRB MHK MS
B-066
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 7
Medium Sand % 31
Fine Sand % 9
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-067
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 8
Medium Sand % 26
Fine Sand % 12
Fines % 54
PRB MHK MS
B-068
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 9
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 14
Fines % 47
PRB MHK MS
B-069
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 3
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 17
Fines % 51
PRB MHK MS
B-070
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 1
Medium Sand % 24
Fine Sand % 18
Fines % 57
PRB MHK MS
B-071
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 32
Fine Sand % 11
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-072
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 12
Fines % 54
PRB MHK MS
B-073
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 32
Fine Sand % 13
Fines % 49
PRB MHK MS
B-074
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 15
Fines % 53
PRB MHK MS
B-075
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 18
Fines % 48
PRB MHK MS
B-076
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 14
Fine Sand % 13
Silt Size % 54
Clay Size % 16
PRB MHK MS
B-077
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 12
Silt Size % 37
Clay Size % 15
PRB MHK MS
B-078
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 26
Fine Sand % 9
Silt Size % 35
Clay Size % 24
PRB MHK MS
B-079
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 13
Medium Sand % 34
Fine Sand % 13
Silt Size % 32
Clay Size % 8
PRB MHK MS
B-080
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 20
Fine Sand % 10
Silt Size % 36
Clay Size % 28
PRB MHK MS
B-081
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 13
Silt Size % 37
Clay Size % 18
PRB MHK MS
B-082
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 17
Medium Sand % 38
Fine Sand % 14
Silt Size % 22
Clay Size % 7
PRB MHK MS
B-083
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 3
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 15
Silt Size % 34
Clay Size % 18
PRB MHK MS
B-084
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 26
Fine Sand % 13
Silt Size % 41
Clay Size % 16
PRB MHK MS
B-085
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 2
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 18
Fine Sand % 11
Silt Size % 36
Clay Size % 27
PRB MHK MS
B-086
TEST REPORT
Sample Description : Clayey SAND with Sand

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 2
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 11
Fine Sand % 7
Silt Size % 40
Clay Size % 34
PRB MHK MS
B-087
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 3
Medium Sand % 22
Fine Sand % 11
Silt Size % 48
Clay Size % 15
PRB MHK MS
B-088
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 23
Fine Sand % 10
Silt Size % #NUM!
Clay Size % #NUM!
PRB MHK MS
B-089
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 13
Silt Size % 42
Clay Size % 13
PRB MHK MS
B-090
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 6
Coarse Sand % 10
Medium Sand % 23
Fine Sand % 8
Silt Size % 38
Clay Size % 15
PRB MHK MS
B-091
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 13
Coarse Sand % 19
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 14
Silt Size % 20
Clay Size % 5
PRB MHK MS
B-092
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 33
Fine Sand % 9
Silt Size % 42
Clay Size % 12
PRB MHK MS
B-093
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 13
Silt Size % 41
Clay Size % 12
PRB MHK MS
B-094
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
-10
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 6
Medium Sand % 25
Fine Sand % 13
Silt Size % 55
Clay Size % 1
PRB MHK MS
B-095
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 5
Medium Sand % 31
Fine Sand % 11
Silt Size % 38
Clay Size % 15
PRB MHK MS
B-096
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 1
Medium Sand % 33
Fine Sand % 18
Silt Size % 43
Clay Size % 5
PRB MHK MS
B-097
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 7
Medium Sand % 31
Fine Sand % 9
Silt Size % 39
Clay Size % 14
PRB MHK MS
B-098
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 1
Coarse Sand % 9
Medium Sand % 29
Fine Sand % 14
Silt Size % 35
Clay Size % 12
PRB MHK MS
B-099
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 4
Medium Sand % 32
Fine Sand % 11
Silt Size % 41
Clay Size % 12
PRB MHK MS
B-100
TEST REPORT

FINES SAND GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000
Particle Size (mm)
Gravel % 0
Coarse Sand % 2
Medium Sand % 30
Fine Sand % 15
Silt Size % 40
Clay Size % 12
PRB MHK MS
B-101
SOIL AND ROCK TESTING LABORATORY
TEST REPORT
Test Method : Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit
Testing Standard : IS 2720 - PART V:1985 (Reaffirmed 2015)
Test Details
Date of Testing : 28/11/17 Lab temperature °C : 24.1
Sample Identification : S1270/BH01/1.5 Method Used : One Point Method

Period of soaking soil
sample before testing : - History of soil sample : Air Dried
FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
Liquid Limit, LL % : 47
50
CH
40
Plastic Limit, PL % : 20
30
MH or OH
CI
20
Plasticity Index, IP : 27 CL
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-102
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CH 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-103
TEST REPORT
Test Details
Date of Testing : 19-Dec-17 Lab temperature °C : 20.8
Sample Identification : S1270/BH03/7.5 Method Used : Mechanical Method

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
Plastic Limit, PL % : NP
30
MH or OH
CI
20
Plasticity Index, IP : NA CL
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-104
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-105
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-106
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-107
TEST REPORT
Test Details
Date of Testing : 13-Dec-17 Lab temperature °C : 29

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-108
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-109
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-110
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-111
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-112
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-113
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-114
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-115
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-116
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-117
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CH 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-118
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-119
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-120
TEST REPORT
Test Details
Date of Testing : 13-Dec-17 Lab temperature °C : 29

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-121
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-122
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : CL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-123
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-124
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-125
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-126
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-127
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-128
TEST REPORT
Test Details

FLOW CURVE
100
90
80
Water Content, (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
No. of blows, N
80
Test Results
70
60
PLASTICITY INDEX,Ip
50
CH
40
30
MH or OH
CI
20
10
CL‐ML MI or OI
0 ML or OL
Group Symbol : NA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
MHK CT MS
B-129
TEST REPORT
Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength
IS 2720 ‐ Part X :1987 (Reaffirmed 2010)
Laboratory Information
Date of Testing : 30/11/17 Details of Apparatus used : -
Lab Temperature °C : 22.7 Details of Load Measuring Device : -
Lab Humidity % : 68 Calibration factor : -
Test Data
Sample Identification : S1270/BH06/4.5 Sample Type : Remoulded
Specific Gravity : 2.68
Initial Diameter of soil specimen, mm : 38
Initial Length of soil specimen, mm : 76
Initial Area of specimen, mm² : 1133.54
3
Initial Volume of specimen, mm : 86149.04
Initial Mass of specmen, (g) : 157.82
Initial Density : 17.97
150.00
125.00
100.00
Strees (kPa)
75.00
50.00
25.00
0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Axial strain (%)
Unconfined Compressive Strength 69 kPa
MHK CT MS
B-130
TEST REPORT
Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength
IS 2720 ‐ Part X :1987 (Reaffirmed 2010)
Date of Testing : 30/11/17 Details of Apparatus used : -
Lab Temperature °C : 22.7 Details of Load Measuring Device : -
Lab Humidity % : 68 Calibration factor : -
Test Data
Sample Identification : S1270/BH11/3.0 Sample Type : Remoulded
Specific Gravity : 2.69
Initial Diameter of soil specimen, mm : 38
Initial Length of soil specimen, mm : 76
Initial Area of specimen, mm² : 1133.54
3
Initial Volume of specimen, mm : 86149.04
Initial Mass of specmen, (g) : 157.82
Initial Density : 17.92
150.00
125.00
100.00
Strees (kPa)
75.00
50.00
25.00
0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Axial strain (%)
Unconfined Compressive Strength 77 kPa
MHK CT MS
B-131
TEST REPORT
:
Test Method Direct Shear Test
:
Testing Standard IS 2720 - Part 13 :1986 (Reaffirmed 2011)
:
Date of Testing 27/Nov/17
:
Sample Identification S1270/BH01/6.0 Sample Desription : Silty SAND
: 6 :
Length (cm) Area, cm2 36
: 2.5 :
Height (cm) Sample Type Remoulded
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200
Horizontal Deformation, mm Normal Stress, kPa
Shear Stress V/s Deformation Shear Stress V/s Normal Stress
From graph, Shear Strength Parameters

Angle of Internal friction,φ
: 35
(deg)
Cohesion ,C (kPa) : 8
Tested by Checked by Approved by

PRB MHK MS
B-132
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
Sample Identification S1270/BH02/4.5 Sample Desription : Sandy SILT
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 34
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-133
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
Date of Testing 09/Dec/17
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 32
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-134
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 34
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-135
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 32
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-136
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 36
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-137
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
300 250
50kPa
250 100kpa
200
Shear Stress, kPa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 0 50 100 150 200 250

: 39
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-138
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-139
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 35
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-140
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 200

: 30
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-141
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 50 100 150 200

: 38
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-142
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 34
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-143
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
100kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-144
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 50 100 150 200

: 40
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-145
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 35
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-146
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 36
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-147
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-148
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 35
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-149
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 30
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-150
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-151
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 30
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-152
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 50 100 150 200

: 38
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-153
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-154
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 37
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-155
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 200

: 29
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-156
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 32
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-157
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-158
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 200

: 32
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-159
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-160
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
Sample Identification S1270/BH16/13.5 Sample Desription : Sandy SILT with Gravel
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 32
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-161
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 34
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-162
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
100kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 34
(deg)

PRB MHK MS
B-163
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 32
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-164
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 0 50 100 150 200

: 31
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-165
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175 100kpa
150kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 200

: 33
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-166
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 36
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-167
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 39
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-168
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 35
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-169
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 34
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-170
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 35
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-171
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 36
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-172
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 38
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-173
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
175 50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 38
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-174
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
180
50kPa
160
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150
140 150kpa
120
100 100
80
60
50
40
20
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 37
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-175
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
150kpa
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 35
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-176
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150kpa 150
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 50 100 150 200

: 37
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-177
TEST REPORT
:
:
:
:
: 6 :
: 2.5 :
200 200
50kPa
175
150kpa
Shear Stress, kPa
Shear Stress, kPa
150 150
125
100 100
75
50 50
25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200

: 35
(deg)

GB MHK MS
B-178
TEST REPORT
Test Method : Determination of Consolidation Properties
Testing Standard : IS 2720 - Part XV:1965 (Reaffirmed 2011)
Date of testing : 23/11/2017 to 01/12/2017
e-log P curve
1 10 100 1000 10000
1.00
PC= 40 KPa
0.90
0.80
VOID RATIO, e
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
PRESSURE INCREMENT, kPa
Co efficient of
Pressure range, volume change
kPa mv,
m2/kN
5-25 0.0005 Sample
25-50 0.0008979 Diameter, mm 60.00
50-100 0.00075674 Area, mm
2 2827.43
100-200 0.00037837 Height, mm 17.00
200-400 0.00021527 Specific Gravity 2.69
400-200 2.0294E-05 Height of solids, mm 9.19
200-50 6.1176E-05 Initial Moisture content, % 29.26
50-25 0.00016235 Initial void ratio, e0 0.85
25-5 0.00037941 Compression Index Cc 0.23
Preconsolidation Pressure (kPa) 40 Tested By Checked By Approved By

MHK CT MS
B-179
TEST REPORT
Test Method : Determination of Consolidation Properties
Testing Standard : IS 2720 - Part XV:1965 (Reaffirmed 2011)
Sample Description : Sandy Silt
Date of testing : 23/11/2017 to 01/12/2017
e-log P curve
1 10 100 1000 10000
0.85
PC= 60 kPa
0.80
VOID RATIO, e
0.75
0.70
0.65
0.60
PRESSURE INCREMENT, kPa
Co efficient of
Pressure range, volume change
kPa mv,
m2/kN
5-10 0.00025588 Sample
10-20 0.00034353 Diameter, mm 60.00
20-40 0.00038353 Area, mm
2 2827.43
40-80 0.00023588 Height, mm 17.00
80-160 0.00015118 Specific Gravity 2.68
160-320 0.00002 Height of solids, mm 9.31
320-640 7.2157E-05 Moisture content, % 25.30
640-160 0.00020941 Initial void ratio, e0 0.83
160-40 0.00048824 Compression Index Cc 0.13
Preconsolidation Pressure (kPa) 60 Tested By Checked By Approved By

MHK CT MS
B-180
APPENDIX-C
i. Site Photographs
ii. Geotechnical Investigation Photographs
C-001
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Vegetation Cover at Site
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver. 3 C-002
Trench and Nala at Site
Pillars of old gate with an abandoned shed
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver. 3 C-003
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CARRIED AT SITE
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver. 3 C-004
S-1270(B)/2017-18/Ver. 3 C-005

17072018N29L159GPre Feasibilityreport PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

17072018N29L159GPre Feasibilityreport PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

17072018N29L159GPre Feasibilityreport PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Conceptual Development Plan

For The Proposed Facility for Aerospace Engineering &

E Mail ID: aquatechenviro2017@gmail.com

A COMPREHENSIVE PROJECT REPORT

B WATER REQUIREMENT DETAILS FOR THE PROJECT

C SEWAGE GENERATION, UTILITY OF TREATED SEWAGE & DESIGN

D WATER BALANCE CHART

E WATER REQUIREMENT AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL DURING

F SOLID WASTE GENERATION & MANAGEMENT DETAILS

G ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)

H RAIN WATER MANAGEMENT SCHEME

I DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE

J EMP FOR CONTROL OF DUST AND NOISE DURING

K RISK ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT PLAN

L GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

M TRAFFIC SURVEY AND ITS MANAGEMENT

N SAVINGS IN ELECTRICAL POWER CONSUMPTION

0 PROJECT RELATED DRAWINGS/PLANS

Sl. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

The associated impact of construction

Drinking water supply and adequate

The workers will be provided with first

Periodic health assessment camps and

Activity, Area statement and Building

The total quantity of excavated soil is

Water requirement for the Construction

Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) of capacity

Quantity of wastewater generation and

Solid waste like construction debris

Sl.No Information/checklist confirmation Yes/ Details thereof (with approximate

Total water requirement is about 125KLD

2.3 Minerals (MT) No NA

2.4 Construction material – stone, Yes Description Unit Quantity

2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels Yes Power Requirement:

Occupancy phase: Low Sulphur content

2.7 Any other natural resources (use No NA

2. Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be

Sl.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

Construction debris of about 400 cum is

5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air (Kg/hr)

Sl.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

Details of control of Dust and Noise

Sl. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/ Details thereof (with approximate

6.3 From construction or demolition No Noise generation due to construction

Occupancy phase: Vehicular movement by

The details of mitigation measure planned

Sl. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

Disaster management plan for Pre

7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up No NA

Sl.N Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could

Sl. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes Details thereof (with approximate

• Supporting infrastructure (roads, Yes Direct & Indirect Employment

New business opportunities are

• housing development Yes Construction of Facility for Aerospace

9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which No NA

CHECK LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS