Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Management Case Studies and Lessons Learned: M. Kemal Atesmen
Project Management Case Studies and Lessons Learned: M. Kemal Atesmen
Management
Case Studies
and Lessons
Learned
Stakeholder, Scope,
Knowledge,
Schedule,
Resource
and Team
Management
M. Kemal Atesmen
Project Management
Case Studies and
Lessons Learned
Stakeholder, Scope,
Knowledge, Schedule,
Resource and
Team Management
Project Management
Case Studies and
Lessons Learned
Stakeholder, Scope,
Knowledge, Schedule,
Resource and
Team Management
M. Kemal Atesmen
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the
validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the
copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to
publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let
us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted,
or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, includ-
ing photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written
permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety
of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment
has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
P R E FA C E vii
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S ix
ABOUT THE A U T H O R xi
I N T R O D U C T i O N xiii
C H A p T E R 1 C A S E S T U D i E S iN S TA K E H O L D E R M A N A G E M E N T 1
C H A p T E R 2 C A S E S T U D i E S iN S C O p E M A N A G E M E N T 57
C H A p T E R 3 C A S E S T U D i E S iN K N O W L E D G E M A N A G E M E N T 77
C H A p T E R 4 C A S E S T U D i E S iN S C H E D U L E M A N A G E M E N T 103
C H A p T E R 5 C A S E S T U D i E S iN R E S O U R C E M A N A G E M E N T 119
C H A p T E R 6 C A S E S T U D i E S iN TE A M M A N A G E M E N T 151
V
Preface
VII
VIII P REFAC E
IX
About the Author
XI
Introduction
X III
XIV IN T R O D U C Ti O N
Your project team is the most important leg of your project man-
agement structure. Any weakness in this structure will definitely
degrade your project’s performance. You have to do all you can to keep
your team under control and make them perform to their highest level
of capabilities. In Chapter 6, I outline 21 challenging cases related to
my projects’ teams.
1
C ASE S TUD IES IN
S TAKEHOLD ER M ANAG EmENT
Stakeholders that can affect your project can vary from your
customer(s), your company, your project partner(s), your company’s
investors, to your subcontractors. During the course of your global
project, you have to manage all these entities as needed.
Health of the cash flow in your company can be a project derailing
factor as it happened to me in Case 1.1. Changing and condensing the
project schedule in order to help my company to get paid two weeks
earlier was a challenging eye opener for me.
Protecting the intellectual property of my company during tech-
nology transfer to a Japanese company was a very challenging project
assignment to me as detailed in Case 1.2. Detailed preparations and
training of my people before Japanese engineers invaded my com-
pany’s facilities were key elements for the project’s success.
Our corporate closed down our company’s operations during the
2000 to 2002 dot-com bust. I was right in the middle of a data com-
munication chip design project. My team and I had to jump over
hoops and had to make lots of sacrifices, but we held together as a
team in order to complete our project successfully. This challenging
event is detailed in Case 1.3.
As travel costs for an internal project to Malaysia skyrocketed, my
travel budget was frozen by my company’s upper management. My
team and I took many steps to curb our travel costs. I pleaded with
my upper management for my project’s travel budget increase. Every
time I was rejected. They emphasized that I should cut down on travel
and keep my travel budget as it was. We did all we could as shown in
Case 1.4, but in the end we still exceeded our travel budget.
During a project every member of my team reported to their partic-
ular department’s manager and reported to me on a dotted line basis.
I had no control of their performance reviews, promotions, salary
1
2 P R O JEC T M A N AG Em EN T C A SE S T UD iE S
increases, training, and personal issues. One day I lost the services
of our whole quality department. I had to scramble to find replace-
ments without hampering the progress of my project as described in
Case 1.5.
I was given the internal project of putting together an extensive
feasibility study in three months in order to give direction to our mag-
netic head manufacturing processes for the next generation of our
products. There were three different approaches in three different
countries that were being considered by different groups in my com-
pany. I detailed the actions I took to generate the feasibility study and
the final decision process in Case 1.6.
Upper management changes in a company can impact positively
or negatively internal project directions, project teams, manage-
ment styles, and project reporting styles. Personnel and responsibility
changes in upper management and on my team caused tsunami effects
to my project. I outlined these effects in Case 1.7.
A project manager has to fully understand at the beginning of the
project all contract agreement conditions for delays in deliveries, pat-
ents, copyrights, trademarks, force majeure, subcontracting rules and
governing laws, and arbitration. In addition to understanding all con-
tract agreement conditions, he has to relay them to his team members
in layman’s terms. Our legal department saved my bacon from a dis-
pute that arose at the end of a project with my customer as detailed
in Case 1.8.
Salary and compensation variations in a multinational company
can cause stress, disputes, and jealousy in an internal project team
environment. Team members have to be very sensitive and careful not
to discuss salary and compensation issues with each other locally or
internationally. Such a flare-up is discussed in Case 1.9.
Lessons learned from previous projects within a company let a proj-
ect manager start his or her project on a strong footing. Undocumented
historical projects and uncontrolled lessons learned items create a
large vacuum for a project manager. Such an occurrence is detailed
in Case 1.10.
A company’s upper management cannot decide on the future direc-
tion of the company internally by themselves. They mostly go outside
to get help. They approach consulting firms, experts in their field,
C A SE S T UD iE S iN S TA K EH O L D ER M A N AG Em EN T 3
even friends outside the company in order to get a fresh outlook and
ideas for the future of their company as shown in Case 1.11.
Your customer(s) are crucial stakeholders in your project. You have
to do all you can to manage your customer(s) too. In order to ease ten-
sions between my Korean engineering project team and my Japanese
customer’s visiting qualification team, I decided to go to Korea first
for two weeks to prepare and train my Korean team for our Japanese
customer’s qualification process both psychologically and technically.
Historical animosities between two countries can affect the prog-
ress of a project. Preparing carefully for such complicated encounters
between project’s parties is described in Case 1.12.
A customer placed a resident engineer into my project group in
the United States to oversee all our activities and to make sure that
their intellectual properties were fully protected. The customer also
assigned a resident engineer to our volume production plant in South
Korea. This resident engineer also traveled to Japan to check on our
subcontractor every fortnight. Complications that were encountered
during the execution of my project with two resident engineers are
detailed in Case 1.13.
I could never close out a project because the final project evalua-
tion by the customer’s project manager was missing. I had to jump
through many hoops in order to get my customer’s final project evalu-
ation report as detailed in Case 1.14.
Communicating filtered information is the backbone of a project’s
control structure. How much information to pass on and how much
you want to disturb the cart are crucial factors during the life of a
project. If every little detail regarding your project goes to your cus-
tomer, you are mismanaging your project. You have to filter out rip-
ples in your communicated information. At the same time you have to
realize what information and when to inform your customer without
any delay. Such challenges were encountered in Case 1.15.
For a global project manager, keeping track of all national and reli-
gious holidays of countries that you are dealing with are a requirement.
You have to also know religious beliefs of every individual you are
dealing with in order not to run into surprises as depicted in Case 1.16.
I received a call from my customer’s project manager that the proj-
ect goods’ shipment arrived safely in South Korea, but they could not