Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Skripsi Yuliana Zahrah PDF
Skripsi Yuliana Zahrah PDF
Skripsi Yuliana Zahrah PDF
YULIANA ZAHRAH
06620140022
A Thesis
In English Department
Thanks to Allah S.W.T for giving me opportunity, the strength and the
S.A.W, He is her way of life. At the end of my thesis I would like thanks to my
beloved parents Khaeruddin and Syamsiah whose selfless life and their great
effort patient love with pain and tears and unceasing preyer has enable me to
This research paper will not be complete without supports, advices, help,
and encouragement from various parties and institution. The deepest thanks to :
Indonesia.
3. Dra. Hj. Muli Umiaty Noer, M.Hum, as the Former of Dekan of Facultly
thesis, for his guidance, suggestion, and motivation to complete this thesis.
6. Muhammad Yunus, S.S, M,Pd, as the second Supervisor for correcting her
thesis, for his guidance, suggestion, and motivation to complete this thesis.
7. Sitti Ramhaniar, S.S, as the Headmaster of SMA LPP YW UMI who has
8. Juwita, S.Pd as the teacher of SMA LPP UW UMI, who has given
10. My dear and beloved brother (Haris), who give me support, suggestion,
11. My beloved sisters LOL ( A. Hilda Sri Hartati, Ika Wilanda Putri,
Bidasari)
Bandu.
13. My family in CV. Harapan Kita (Imran, Irma Suryani, Isma Wati,
18. Every body who had contributed to complete my final research paper.
Finally this thesis is expected to provide useful knowledge and
pleased to accept more suggestion and contribution for the better thesis.
The Writer,
YULIANA ZAHRAH
NIM : 06620140022
ABSTRAK
YULIANA ZAHRAH 2018 English Education Department, Faculty of Letters,
Muslim University of Indonesia. Thesis “IMPROVING STUDENTS
SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH INTERVIEW TECHNIQUE AT SMA
LPP YW UMI” Advisor by Abdollah as the first consultant and Muhammad
Yunus as the second consultant.
The aims of the research are to determine of the students’ speaking ability through
interview technique and how effective is interview technique in improving
students’ speaking ability at SMA LPP YW UMI.
The method that use in this research was used descriptive qualitative method by
using SPSS 22 and questionnaire. The population of the research was the second
grade of SMA LPP YW UMI. The researcher applied a total sampling for 14
students.
The result of data anlysis showed that the mean score is post-test higher than the
pre-test. The mean students score at the pre test is 39,28. But in the post test, the
mean students score is 77,14. In addition, the mean score increase 37,857 which is
devides in five categories of speaking (pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary,
fluency, and comprehension) or there were 9 (64,28%) students who passed
Minimum Matery Criteron - Kriteria Ketuntasan Minumal (KKM) its show that,
the interview technique improved students’ speaking ability. And based on the
results of questionnaire percentage, most of the students’ agree with the
statements interview technique improve their speaking ability. It means that, the
researcher concluded interview technique effective to improving students’
speaking ability.
LIST OF CONTENT
ACKNOWLEDMENT ......................................................................................... iv
A. Background ............................................................................ 1
A. Speaking ................................................................................. 5
B. Interview ................................................................................ 10
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD .............................................................. 14
A. Conclusions ............................................................................ 32
B. Suggestions ............................................................................ 33
BIBLOPGRAPHY ................................................................................................ 34
APPENDICES ...................................................................................................... 36
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.3 The Students Speaking Score in Pre Test And Post Test ..................... 23
C. Questionnaire ........................................................................................... 42
D. Pictures .................................................................................................... 46
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
are four important skills, namely speaking, writing, reading, and listening.
Speaking is one of the most demaining ability in the daily life and through
the target language. They need to learn both language skills and also
activities.
school, most of the students in vocational schools rarely use English when
when they want to share their idea in English orally. They are afraid of
class where the students can actively communicate with others in English.
them selves. The teacher still uses the traditional method where he or she
students and the teachers work together to purpose goals and objectives.”
they are less affection to learn English language especially for speaking.
Seeing the problem that exist in the class XI IPA at SMA LPP YW
interview technique.
writer must select the suitable technique or stategi to solve this case named
improve speaking ability. Its one of teaching techniques which can make
B. Problem Statement
interview technique?
speaking ability?
technique.
2. To determine the effective is interview technique in improving
students .
ability.
The scope of this research only focus about speaking and responses
A. Speaking
1. Defenition of Speaking
other.
'Allamahul bayaan(a).
can clash with the formal nature of the classroom when teaching
speaking.
above, the writer can conclude that. Speaking is something use for
talking and communicating with onother people and one of the most
2. Speaking ability
complex and difficult than people assume, and speaking study like
teachers.
listener, the massage and the feedback. Speaking could not be sperate
sounds.
follows:
convey meaning.
idea.
4. Aspects of Speaking
a. Comprehension
b. Grammar
d. Pronunciation
the element and principles that determine how sounds vary and
pattern in language.
e. Fluency
„ums‟ or „ers.
research background, so the researcher will take all of the aspects above
speaker wants to say. Through speaking, one can express their minds,
B. Interview
1. Defenition of Interview
students have time to express their ides and then practice their
speaking ability, the writer expect that the students’ ability in speaking
would be improved. On the other the writer interest to conduct
RESEARCH METHOD
A. Research Design
analyze the data. Where way to process the data, which could be done with
Treatment (X) is give beteween pre test (O1) and post test- (O2).
O1 X O2
Where :
O1 = Pre-test
X = Treatment
O2 = Post-test
B. Source of Data
The researcher takes place in SMA LPP UMI where all of the
students XI IPA are involve. Based on the data of the students, the
students. Almost the students came from the local area of Makassar. This
school has English lesson that is give to the second grade as the second
D. Research Instrument
To collect the data, the writer used the speaking test. The speaking
test is apply in the pre-test and post-test. It is intent to know the prior
E. Data Collection
1. Pre-test
students. In this part, the writer introduce and talk to her purpose to
the students and the writer will give test to determine the ability of
elementary students.
2. Treatment
or half hour.
3. Post-test
The writer give the post-test to find out the value of treatment
whether or not the result of the post-test is better than the result of the
a. Speaking Test
interview each other and then write the results of the interview
comprehension.
1 Pronunciation 20
2 Grammar 20
3 Vocabulary 20
4 Fluency 20
5 Comprehension 20
Total 100
b. Questionnaire
F. Data Analysis
To analysis the data, the researcher finding t-test. Finding out the
standar deviation and t-test of the data. The researcher used SPSS 22 to
c. After that, click analyze and chose compare means then paired-
samples t test.
d. Click arrow to displaced data pretest.
finished.
• 61 – 80 High
• 41 – 60 Medium
• 21 – 40 Low
• 0 – 20 Very low
Syakur (1987 : 3)
CHAPTER IV
In this chapter the writer presents the result of the research . The writer
classifes this chapter in two points. It consist of the ability of students through
First, in the data finding are the result of the research that
consist of data from the study subject during the study. These results
indicate that the subject under study avhievement and the result is still
not pay attantion to the teacher. Because the reason a student can not
Table 4.1
6 NURAZIZAH 70 High
TOTAL 550
TOTAL 1080
u
Students’ who passed KKM (75)
Table 4.3
3 RIYAS RASYID 20 70
4 MUHAMMAD SULAIMAN 40 85
6 NURAZIZAH 70 98
7 NURUL HUSNA 60 87
8 RENI ASRIANI 30 70
9 DELLA APRILIA 30 78
10 FUAD ZAKARIA 20 65
S
11 ELWIN DWI PRASETYO 60 80
t
12 u AISYA NURFADILLAH 40 75
9
= x 100%
14
= 64,28%
from the pre-test to the post-test, below the writer analyzed the data used
deviation 15,915 and standard error mean was 4,254) and the students’
post-test mean score was 77,14 (with standard deviation 11,135 and
N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 Pre_Test & Post_Test 14 ,834 ,000
Paired Differences
95% Confidence
Std. Interval of the Sig.
Std. Error Difference (2-
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df tailed)
Pair 1 Pre_Test -
-37,857 9,037 2,415 -43,075 -32,639 -15,674 13 ,000
Post_Test
3. Standard Error Mean paired pre test and post test : 2,415
Lower : -43,075
Upper : -32,639
5. Ttabel : -15,674
6. df : 13
7. Sig : 0,000
Because the writer got the Sig. : 0,000 < 0,05 is bigger than the
grade in post test higher than mean grade in pre test, or there is
significant difference between students’ ability in pre test and post test.
The result of data analysis which were the data had been analyzed
test and post tes. It mean the Interview Technique was succed improving
ability.
𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Persetange = x 100%
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙
Tabulation Pesentage
NO.
A B Total A B Total
1 14 0 14 100% 0% 100%
2 13 1 14 93% 7% 100%
3 13 1 14 93% 7% 100%
4 3 11 14 21% 79% 100%
5 13 1 14 93% 7% 100%
6 1 13 14 7% 93% 100%
7 14 0 14 100% 0% 100%
8 2 12 14 14% 86% 100%
9 12 2 14 89% 14% 100%
10 3 11 14 21% 79% 100%
11 0 14 14 0% 100% 100%
12 12 2 14 86% 14% 100%
13 12 2 14 86% 14% 100%
14 2 12 14 14% 86% 100%
15 1 13 14 7% 93% 100%
From item above has showed that all the students or 14 (100%)
students who agree with the statement. The research concluded that all
technique.
From item above has showed that, 13 (93%) students who agree with
the statement and 1 (7%) students who disagree with the statement.
The research concluded that most of the students not bored thought
motivation in speaking
From item above has showed that, 13 (93%) students who agree with
the statement and 1 (7%) students who disagree with the statement.
motivation in speaking
From item above has showed that, 3 (21%) students who agree with
the statement and 11 (79%) students who disagree with the statement.
my curosity in speaking
From item above has showed that, 13 (93%) students who agree with
the statement and 1 (7%) students who disagree with the statement.
speaking.
to my curosity in speaking
From item above has showed that, 1 (7%) students who agree with the
statement and 13 (93%) students who disagree with the statement. The
speaking.
From item above has showed that, 14 (100%) students who agree with
the statement. The research concluded all of the students improve their
technique
From item above has showed that, 2 (14%) students who agree with
the statement and 12 (86%) students who disagree with the statement.
The research concluded that most of the students improv their speaking
From item above has showed that, 12 (86%) students who agree with
the statement and 2 (14%) students who disagree with the statement.
From item above has showed that, 3 (21%) students who agree with
the statement and 11 (79%) students who disagree with the statement.
freedom to think
From item above has showed that, 14 (100%) students who agree with
From item above has showed that, 12 (86%) students who agree with
the statement and 2 (14%) students who disagree with the statement.
technique
From item above has showed that, 12 (86%) students who agree with
the statement and 2 (14%) students who disagree with the statement.
interview technique
From item above has showed that, 2 (14%) students who agree with
the statement and 12 (86%) students who disagree with the statement.
From item above has showed that, 12 (86%) students who agree with
the statement and 2 (14%) students who disagree with the statement.
interview technique.
Based on the percentage has calculated above, The research
chapter, and after the writer conducted research in SMA LPP YW UMI
A. Conclusions
1. Based on the results using SPSS 22, showed that the mean score is
post test higher than the pre test. The mean students score at the pre
test is 39,28. But the mean students score in the post test is 77,14. It
means that, the mean score increase 37,857 which is devided in the
ability.
2. For the students : The students should practice their English everyday
untill reach the high level, and use the other topic in daily conversation
to speak.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abdullah . Mudah dan Cepat Bisa Berbahasa Inggris dengan Metode London
Village. Global English Course : Makassar
Haley James and Hobson. (1999). Teaching Oral English, New edition:
Longman, Longman Handbooks for Languange Teacher.
Class XI IPA
GENDER
NO NAME
1 NUR ANISA F
2 NERLY JUSTAN F
RIYAS RASYID M
3
MUHAMMAD SULAIMAN M
4
A.M ADITYA WARDANA M
5
NURAZIZAH F
6
NURUL HUSNA F
7
RENI ASRIANI F
8
DELLA APRILIA F
9
FUAD ZAKARIAH BAHARUDDIN M
10
ELWIN DWI PRASETYO M
11
AISYAH NURFADILLAH F
12
Information :
Female (F) :8
Male (M) :6
APPENDIX 2
LESSON PLAN
Kelas/Semester : XI/Genap
A. Standar Kompetensi
sehari hari.
B. Kompetensi Dasar
Siswa menggunakan tata bahasa, kosa kata tanda baca, ejaan dan
D. Tujuan Pembejaran
E. Materi Pokok
- My name is .....
- I live in .....
- My hobby is .....
F. Metode Pembelajaran
Interview Technique
G. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
1. Kegiatan Awal
dicapai.
2. Kegiatan Inti
teman kelompok.
3. Kegiatan Akhir
salam penutup.
H. Sumber / Bahan / Alat
I. Penilaian
- Comprehension : 20
- Grammar : 20
- Vocabulary : 20
- Pronuncation : 20
- Fluency : 20
QUESTIONNAIRE
TEKNIK INTERVIEW
Petunjuk :
2. Pilih dan berilah tanda silang (X) pada jawaban yang sesuai dengan
dengan memberi tanda 2 garis (=), dan memberi tanda silang (X)
mengikuti pelajaran.
PICTURES