V.A.S.

DESIGN & INFRA STRUCTURE

CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.

Report No‐VAS/NDTCT/IMP066
BIL ASSAM CORE CUTTING REPORT
TOWER TYPE: GBT
CIRCLE: ASSAM

SITE DETAILS
Site ID : IMP066
TECH. ID: NEGT10117 OVER ALL SITE PHOTOGRAPH
Type of Site: GBT
Cluster: Imphal
SAM & SAM Name & contact no: N/A
Tower Core Cutting Agency : VAS
Tower height (M) N/A
NO of core 2
Tower configuration: --
Wind Speed: 170 Kmph
Type of Foundation PILE
Engineer Name Mr.Lalchand

Observation regarding footing & column

Sample ID-
IMP066 Correction Equivalent Cube
Dia (mm) Height (mm) Factor of Compressive Average
Sample Name height/Dia Strength(N/mm2)
leg N0‐1

L1-C1 68.75 121.14 0.97 21.56

19.25
L2-C1 69.02 87.50 0.92 16.94

Average Compressive strength of Column= 19.25 N/mm2 >17

Hence strengthening of Foundation is not required

Site ID: IMP066

Site Name: NEGT10117

✘

c/c=6200 c/c=
Triangular Rectangular
1. Type Of foundation

A. Isolated footing
B. Raft Foundation Rectangular Triangular
C.Pile Foundation ✘

2. Column Size

Size at bottom …….800…….. x …….800…….. mm

Size at Top …….800…….. x …….800…….. mm
Column Height …….2600……..mm
Height of Column Exposed Ground Level …….750…….. mm
Center to center distance …….6200……..mm

3. Column Condition

Crack found on column…………… YES ✘ NO PHOTO

Column surface Rought…………… YES ✘ NO PHOTO
Column Found TIlted………………. YES NO ✘ PHOTO
(how much tilt…………………………… ………………0.0……………..)
Honycombing Found Column……… YES ✘ NO PHOTO
Column is found ecentric with raft……… YES ✘ NO PHOTO
Measure face of column to edge of raft (…………………0.0…………….)
Base plate is found center of column….. YES ✘ NO PHOTO
(If ecentric measure center of column to center of base plate)
Crack or honycombing found at the bolt grouting portion YES ✘ NO PHOTO
Foundation lock nut & bolt missing YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Rebar visible in column YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Rusting in column rebar YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Proper cement quantity found in column YES ✘ NO PHOTO

4. Raft Size

Width of raft/footing/Pile Cap………………………… 2600 to 2600 mm

Depth of raft / footing/Pile cap…………………… 300 to xxx mm
Size of raft step length……………………………… xxx Width xxx Depth xxx
PCC work found…………………………………………………………….. YES ✘ NO PHOTO
Sand Filling …………………………………………………………………… YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Crack found in raft ………………………………………………………… YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Rebar visible in raft ………………………………………………………… YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Rusting in raft re-bar ……………………………………………………… YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Higher aggregate quantity found concrete ……………………… YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Right cement quantity found in concrete ……………………….. YES NO ✘ PHOTO
Surface of raft is found rough ………………..……………………….. YES ✘ NO PHOTO
Back filling Required …………...………………..……………………….. YES NO ✘ PHOTO
5. Soil Condition

Soil strata found at site ………………..…………………… Hard Medium ✘ Soft

Type of soil …………………………………..…………………… Sandy ✘ Sandy clay Silty Clay
Water contant in soil……………………..………………….. High Average Low ✘

6. Reinforcement Condition

Rebar in columns…….Not Visible……No's………….Not Visible…………Dia (mm)

Rebar Cover in columns…….Not Visible……………………………..…………Dia (mm)
Rebar in raft…………….Not Visible……No's………….Not Visible…………Dia (mm)
Rebar Cover in raft……...…….Not Visible……………………………..…………Dia (mm)
Grade of re-bar……...…….Not Visible……………………………..…………………………..

DRAW FOUNDATION ELEVATION

800
750

G.L G.L
1850

900 800 900

xxx xxx
300
xxx

C/C = 6200 mm
 CORE TEST RESULTS (SITE ID-IMP066)
UNIT OF
S. NO. PARAMETER TEST METHOD RESULTS
RESULTS

IS:516 pt-
1.PHYSICAL TEST L1-C1
4:2018

IS:516 pt-
1) Idenfication Mark 4:2018

IS:516 pt-
2) Date of Casting 4:2018

IS:516 pt-
3) Date of Testing 5/13/2020
4:2018

IS:516 pt-
4) Age of Specimen 4:2018 Days

IS:516 pt-
5) Average Dimension of specimen 4:2018

a Height IS:516 pt- 121.14 mm

4:2018

b Diameter IS:516 pt- 68.8 mm

4:2018

IS:516 pt-
6) Height/Diameter Ration 4:2018 1.76

7) Height/Diameter Ration correction factor IS:516 pt- 0.97

4:2018

8) Correction factor for core diameter (Core having diameter less then 100mm) IS:516 pt- 1.06
4:2018

IS:516 pt-
9) Cross-Section area 3710 mm^2
4:2018

IS:516 pt-
10) Maximum load 62 KN
4:2018

11) Measured Compressive Strength IS:516 pt- 16.71 N/mm^2

4:2018

IS:516 pt-
12) Corrected Compressive strength 17.71 N/mm^2
4:2018

IS:516 pt-
13) Corrected Cylinder Strength 17.25 N/mm^2
4:2018

IS:516 pt-
14) Equivalent Cube Strength 4:2018 21.56 N/mm^2
 CORE TEST RESULTS (SITE ID-BHGGT01)
UNIT OF
S. NO. PARAMETER TEST METHOD RESULTS
RESULTS

IS:516
1.PHYSICAL TEST pt-4:2018 L2-C1

IS:516
1) Idenfication Mark pt-4:2018

IS:516
2) Date of Casting
pt-4:2018

IS:516
3) Date of Testing pt-4:2018 5/13/2020

IS:516
4) Age of Specimen pt-4:2018 Days

5) Average Dimension of specimen IS:516

pt-4:2018

a Height IS:516 87.50 mm

pt-4:2018

IS:516
b Diameter pt-4:2018 69.02 mm

6) Height/Diameter Ration IS:516 1.27

pt-4:2018

7) Height/Diameter Ration correction factor IS:516 0.92

pt-4:2018

IS:516
8) Correction factor for core diameter (Core having diameter less then 100mm) 1.06
pt-4:2018

IS:516
9) Cross-Section area 3739 mm^2
pt-4:2018

10) Maximum load IS:516 52 KN

pt-4:2018

IS:516
11) Measured Compressive Strength 13.91 N/mm^2
pt-4:2018

IS:516
12) Corrected Compressive strength 14.74 N/mm^2
pt-4:2018

IS:516
13) Corrected Cylinder Strength pt-4:2018 13.55 N/mm^2

IS:516
14) Equivalent Cube Strength pt-4:2018 16.94 N/mm^2
 SITE PHOTOGRAPH

During core extraction During core extraction

While Repairing While Measurment

 Average CORRECTIO
MEMBER LENGTH Diameter at Diameter at Diameter at
SITE ID Diameter L/D RATIO N FACTOR LOAD (kN)
NAME (mm) top(mm) Middle (mm) bottom (mm)
(mm) L/D RATIO

L1-C1 121.14 68.43 68.84 68.98 68.75 1.762 0.974 62

L2-C1 87.50 68.92 69.01 69.12 69.02 1.268 0.919 52
L1-P1
IMP066
L2-C1
L2-R1
L2-P1
 CYLINDRIC
AL CYLINDRIC
CYLINDRIC
COMPRESSI AL
Area of AL EQUIVALEN
VE COMPRESSI
Surface load COMPRESSI T CUBE AVERAGE
STRENGTH VE
Apllied VE STRENGTH (MPa)
FOR CORES STRENGTH
(MM^2) STRENGTH (MPa)
(<100 FOR L/D
(MPa)
mmDIA) RATIO (MPa)
(MPa)

3712.2422 16.70 17.704 17.240 21.55

3741.096 13.90 14.734 13.547 16.93 19.24

#DIV/0!