Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted in Partial Fulfilment For The Award of Degree of
Submitted in Partial Fulfilment For The Award of Degree of
on
DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF BRAIN TUMOR
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
In
Submitted By:
Farheen Wahab
(Roll no.: 1701311002)
This is to certify that Farheen Wahab has carried out the research work
using Support Vector Machine based GUI” for the award of Master of
under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, the contents of this thesis have
not been submitted to any other institute or university for the award of any degree.
Signature of Supervisor
Department of ECE
Integral University
Lucknow
Date -
ii
ABSTRACT
iii
features, for instance, first and second order features are calculated from the
images. These features mainly include texture features such as mean, entropy,
correlation, contrast and many others. Discrete wavelet transform is used to
denoise the images and extract the desired features from them. There are
plenty of features which can be obtained from the images, but not all of them
are useful, so there is a need to reduce the features to the desired level.
Principle component analysis (PCA) is used for feature reduction. The main
advantage of using PCA is that it regroups the features according to their
contribution in retaining the variance of the image. All the features are then
checked and the ones making the least contribution are rejected from the list.
In this way, no important feature is lost. The classification problem is treated
by using Support Vector Machines (SVM) which is a well-accepted method
nowadays to handle the similar problems.
Lastly, an interface has been developed for the same algorithm to easily
access the work. The interface requires the user to enter the input image and
the segmented image for the same can be obtained by clicking on the required
push button. All the features will be displayed automatically after the
segmented image is obtained. The entire work has been implemented using
MATLAB R2013a. The experimental work is shown in chapter 5. The
classification analysis shows that the highest accuracy was achieved with the
linear kernel, i.e. about 86.5 %. The RBF, polygonal and quadratic kernels
achieved 78.5 %, 77.5 % and 77.5 % respectively. The time analysis shows
that the entire classification process took about 0.0428 seconds to complete.
This shows that the experiment can be incorporated in real time situations.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
“He is the source of all light and His light is diffused throughout the universe.
Allah has given the man intelligent speech, power of expression, and capacity
to understand clearly the relations of things.”
First and foremost I would thank the Almighty whose infinite grace
make all things possible. I am grateful to my parents who have inculcated in
me good values and culture and because of their immense contribution, this
work is dedicated to them as a token of love. We are living in the age of
electronics and this field has witnessed radical changes over the last decades.
We have observed vast application of electronics in almost every walk of life
especially in the field of medical science. This fascinated me to do something
in this field as a student of electronics science.
v
mentioned the entire teaching fraternity of Department of Electronics and
Communication Engineering for their untiring efforts in educating me.
FARHEEN WAHAB
Roll No 1701311002
Department of ECE
Integral University
Lucknow
vi
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 2
2. Literature Review 5
2.1 Highlights of the work 9
3. Image Segmentation Basics 12
3.1 Some Imaging Concepts 13
3.2 Images of Brain and their Treatment 15
3.2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging 16
3.2.2 Diagnosis of Brain Tumor 17
3.2.3 Diversity of Brain Tumor 21
3.3 Image Segmentation 21
3.4 Conclusion 26
4. Support Vector Machine 28
4.1 Notations 28
4.2 SVM used for Binary Classification 28
4.2.1 Linear Classification with linearly separable
29
problems
4.2.2 Linear Classification with non-separable 35
vii
problems
4.2.3 Non-Linear Classification with non-separable
36
problems
4.3 Multi Class SVM 39
4.4 Conclusion 41
5. Results 43
5.1 Flowchart 44
5.2 Noise Reduction 45
5.3 Feature extraction and reduction 47
5.3.1 First order features 50
5.3.2 Second order features 51
5.4 K-Fold Stratified Cross Validation 54
5.5 Experiments and Discussion 55
5.5.1 Results for Benign Tumor 57
5.5.2 Results for Malignant Tumor 63
5.5.3 Classification Analysis 69
5.5.4 Time evaluation 69
Conclusion And Future Scope 71
References 73
Publications 77
APPENDIX I 78
viii
List of Tables
ix
List of Figures
x
4.8 Representation of high dimensional feature space 37
4.9 Transformation of non-linear separator into linear 37
4.10 (a) polynomial classifier (b) RBF 39
5.1 Proposed algorithm 44
5.2 Wavelet Decomposition 49
5.3 2D DWT schematics 49
5.4 Relationship between pair of pixels 52
5.5 5-fold cross validation 54
5.6 Normal brain MR scans 55
5.7 Representation of level 3 wavelet decomposition 56
5.8 Variance curve 57
5.9-5.18 Segmentation results for benign tumor 57-62
5.19-5.28 Segmentation results for malignant tumor 63-68
5.29 Time evaluation at different stages 70
xi
List of Abbreviations
xii
IN Inertia
KNN K-Nearest Neighbours
KSVM Kernel Support Vector Machine
LINPACK Linear System Package
LH Local Homogeneity
LH, LL Low-High, Low-Low
MATLAB MATrix LABoratory
MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MR Magnetic Resonance
NBTF National Brain Tumor Foundation
NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
NSCT Non Sub sampled Transform
PCA Principle Component Analysis
PET Positron Emission Tomography
PNN Probabilistic Neural Network
RAM Random Access Memory
RBF Radial Basis function
SA Simulated Annealing
SE Structuring Element
SGLDM Spatial Gray Level Dependence Matrix
SVM Support Vector Machine
TE, TR Echo time, Repetition Time
TCIA The Cancer Imaging Archive
WHO World Health Organisation
WT Wavelet Transform
xiii