Quim. Nova, Vol. 33, No.

1, 104-108, 2010

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITIES FROM THE ESSENTIAL OILS OF

MYRTACEAE SPECIES PLANTED IN BRAZIL
Artigo

Cleber J. Silva
Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. PH Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa – MG, Brasil
Luiz C. A. Barbosa*, Antonio J. Demuner e Ricardo M. Montanari
Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. PH Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa – MG, Brasil
Antônio L. Pinheiro
Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. PH Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa – MG, Brasil
Iara Dias e Nélio J. Andrade
Departamento de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. PH Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa – MG, Brasil

Recebido em 10/2/09; aceito em 24/6/09; publicado na web em 13/11/09

The essential oils of seven Myrtaceae species were investigated for its chemical composition and antibacterial activity. The volatile
oils were characterized by a high content of monoterpenoids of which 1,8-cineole (88.0, 65.0 and 77.0% for Melaleuca hypericifolia,
Callistemon viminalis and Callistemon citrinus respectively), terpinen-4-ol (47.0 and 49.8% for Melaleuca thymifolia and Callistemon
polandii respectively) and α-pinene (54.5% for Kunzea ericoides) were the major components. The oil from M. linariifolia was
characterized by a high concentration of methyleugenol (87.2%). The oil from Melaleuca thymifolia was the most active, exhibiting
high antimicrobial activity against all tested bacteria.

Keywords: Myrtaceae; antibacterial activity; Melaleuca.

INTRODUCTION
The development of microbial resistance to antibiotics is a global
concern. In the recent decades, antimicrobial of plant origin have
gained special attention because of the resistance to antibiotics that
some microorganisms have acquired.1 Indeed, the committee on
Food Safety (FAO/WHO) concluded that foodborne illness due to
contaminated food was perhaps the most widespread health problem
in the world.2 In this context the identification and evaluation of
natural products for the control of foodborne pathogens, to assure
consumers a safe, wholesome food supply, can be an important
international issue. Many spices and herbs may serve as potential
alternatives since their essential oils possess antimicrobial activity.3
There is considerable interest in the possible use of these oils as food
additives, to delay the onset of food spoilage or to prevent the growth
of foodborne pathogens and microorganisms resistant to antibiotics.
Among these pathogens Bacilus cereus, Escherichia coli and Sta-
phylococcus aureus are of great importance.
The genus Melaleuca L. (Myrtaceae) occurs predominantly
in Australia and comprises approximately 250 described species.4
Volatile compounds of great economic importance can be found
in the species of the Melaleuca genus. Moreover, leaves and stem
of several Melaleuca species are source of essential oils used for
medicinal purposes. Many of such oils present anti-inflammatory,5
fungicide,6 acaricide,7 antiviral8 properties and are also active against
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.9 Besides, the essential oils
of M. alternifolia and related species exhibit activity against herpes
simplex virus (HSV), causal agent of labial herpes.10 The oil is also
used for treatment of human melanoma,11 insect bites, skin infec-
tions,12 subcutaneous infections caused by fungi,13 oral and genital
candidiasis,14 treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus au-
reus15 and respiratory infections.16 These volatile oils are widely used
in industry due to their broad-spectrum of antimicrobial properties.
*e-mail: lcab@ufv.br
The Kunzea genus, also from the Myrtaceae family, is endemic
to Australia and is recognized mainly for its antimicrobial activity,
e.g. Kanuka oil.17 Insecticidal activity has also been described for the
oils produced by several species, including K. ambigua, K. baxterii
and K. ericifolia. The compounds responsible for such an activity
have been isolated and characterized. They all contain as a common
structural motif the presence of tetramethylcyclohexenedione (or
similar) moiety.18
The Callistemon genus is closely related to Melaleuca and com-
prises approximately 30 species endemic in Australia.19 Callistemon
species are widely used as ornamental and are source of chemical
compounds with insecticidal,20 antifungal21 and antibacterial activi-
ties against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus
pneumoniae e Pseudomonas aeruginosa.22 The essential oils of C.
lanceolatus exhibit activity against Staphylococcus aureus and mode-
rated activity against other Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
and fungi Rhizopus oligosporus e Aspergillus niger.23
Following our previous investigations on the biological activities
and composition of volatile oils from several plant species,24 in this
work we report the results concerning the chemical composition
and antibacterial activities of the volatile oils from seven Myrtaceae
species grown in Brazil.
EXPERIMENTAL
Plant material
Aerial parts of Melaleuca hypericifolia C. Sm., M. thymifolia Sm.,
M. linariifolia Sm., Callistemon polandii F. M. Bailey, C. citrinus
(Curtis) Skeels, C. viminalis Sol. ex Gartn. and Kunzea ericoides (A.
Rich.) J. Thompson were collected in February 2008, from plants
grown in the arboretum of the Forest Engineering Department,
Dendrology Sector, at the Federal University of Viçosa (UFV),
Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Melaleuca samples were obtained from
a 10-year old plantation and samples of all the other species came
Vol. 33, No. 1 Chemical composition and antibacterial activities
from 4-year old plantations. In all cases, the seeds originated from
CSIRO - Division of Forestry and Forest Products – Canberra – ACT.
The materials were identified, herborized and a voucher specimen
of each plant has been deposited in the VIC Herbarium (registration
numbers are 31908, 31906, 31905, 30825, 30816, 31116 and 31909)
of the Plant Biology Department, Federal University of Viçosa (UFV).
Essential oil extraction
Leaves were collected separately, in a completely randomized
way, from the trees under investigation. Each sample was subdivided
into three portions of 100 g each, chopped and then subjected to a
three hours hydrodistillation in a Clevenger-type apparatus. The
resulting oils were weighed and the reported yields were calculated
with respect to dry matter mass. All distillations were repeated three
times and the oils produced in these processes were stored under
nitrogen atmosphere, maintained at -4 oC, until they were analyzed
by gas chromatography coupled to a mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
Leaf dry matter mass was calculated by drying each sample (2 g, held
at 103 ± 2 ºC until constant mass) according to published methods.25
Each determination was carried out in triplicate.
Gas chromatography
GC analyses were carried out with a GC-17A Series instrument
(Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID).
Chromatographic conditions were as follows: fused silica capillary
column (30 m x 0.22 mm) with a DB-5 bonded phase (0.25 mm film
thickness); carrier gas, N2 at a flow rate of 1.8 mL min-1; injector
temperature 220 °C, detector temperature 240 °C; column temperature
was programmed to start at 55 °C (isothermal for 2 min), with an
increase of 3 °C min-1, to 240 °C, isothermal at 240 °C for 15 min;
injection of 1.0 mL (1% w/v in CH2Cl2); split ratio 1:10; column
pressure of 115 kPa.
The analyses were carried out in triplicate and the amount of
each compound was expressed as a relative percentage of the total
area of the chromatograms.
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
The GC-MS unit (model GCMS-QP5050A, from Shimadzu, Japan)
was equipped with a DB-5 fused silica column (30 m x 0.22 mm i.d., film
thickness 0.25 mm) and interfaced with an ion trap detector. Oven and
injector temperatures were as described above; transfer line temperature,
240 ºC; ion trap temperature, 220 ºC; carrier gas, He at a flow rate of
1.8 mL min-1; injector temperature 220 °C, detector temperature 240
°C; column temperature was programmed to start at 55 °C (isothermal
for 2 min), with an increase of 3 °C min-1, to 240 °C, isothermal at 240
°C for 15 min; injection of 1.0 mL (1% w/v in CH2Cl2); split ratio 1:10;
column pressure of 100 kPa; ionization energy, 70 eV; scan range,
29-450 u; scan time, 1s. The identity of each component was assigned
by comparison of their retention indexes (RRI), relative to a standard
alkane series (C9-C27)26 and also by comparison of its mass spectrum
with either reference data from the equipment database (Wiley 330,000)
or from the literature.27
Bacterial strains
Bacterial strains were obtained from the collections of the De-
partment of Microbiology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa,
Minas Gerais state Brazil. Microorganisms used were Gram (+)
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Bacillus cereus, Ribotype
1 222-173-S4 of from equipment surfaces post-pasteurization;28 Gram
105
(-) Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229). Organisms were maintained in
nutrient agar (Sigma) at 37 °C. Overnight cultures were prepared in
Brain Heart Infusion Broth (Himedia) and adjusted to approximately
108 CFU mL-1.
Antibacterial screening
The agar disc diffusion method was employed to determine the
antimicrobial activity of the essential oils, as previously described.29
Briefly, a suspension of the tested microorganism (2 x108 CFU mL-1)
was spread on Petri plates with Mueller Hinton agar. Filter paper
discs (6 mm diameter) were individually impregnated with 10 µl of
the essential oils and placed on the inoculated plates. The plates were
incubated for 48 hours at 37 ºC in the cases of S. aureus and E. coli
and at 32 °C for B. cereus. The diameters of the inhibition zones were
measured using a paquimeter and expressed in millimeters. Positive
and negative growth controls were included in each experiment. The
antibiotics Vancomycin (30 µg), Penicillin G (10 UI), Erythromycin
(15 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Streptomycin (10 µg), were used as
positive controls and sterile water served as negative control. Each
test was performed in three triplicates and repeated three times. The
results were analyzed by ANOVA and Scott-Knott’s multiple-range
tests at P ≤ 0.05 by using the software GENES (Genetics and Sta-
tistical Analysis. Version 2007.0.0 - Federal University of Viçosa,
Viçosa – MG, Brazil).
Determinations of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)
A broth microdilution method was used to determine the mini-
mum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal
concentration (MBC).30 A serial doubling dilution of each essential
oil was prepared in a microtiter tray over the range 0.0156–2%. The
broth was supplemented with tween 80 (Merck, Germany) at a con-
centration of 0.5% (v/v) in order to enhance essential oils solubility.
Overnight broth cultures of each strain were prepared in Brain Heart
Infusion Broth (Himedia) and the final concentration in each well was
adjusted to 2x105 CFU/mL following inoculation. The concentration
of each inoculum was confirmed by viable count on Plate Count
Agar (Himedia). Positive and negative growth controls were included
in every test. The tray was incubated aerobically at 30 oC (Gram-
negative) or 37 oC (Gram-positive) according to strain and MICs were
determined. The MIC is defined as the lowest concentration of the
essential oil at which the microorganism tested does not demonstrate
visible growth. The bacteria growth was indicated by the turbidity.
To determine MBCs, 100 µL broth was taken from each well and
inoculated in Mueller-Hinton Agar (Himedia) for 24 h at 30 or 37 oC.
The MBC is defined as the lowest concentration of the essential oil at
which 99.99% or more of the initial inoculum was killed. The number
of surviving organism was determined by viable count. All tests were
performed in Mueller-Hinton Broth (Himedia) and triplicate.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Hydrodistillation of fresh leaves of Myrtaceae species gave
the followings yields for volatile oils, based on dry weight matter:
Melaleuca thymifolia 4.0%±0.01; M. hypericifolia 3.8%±0.20; M.
Linariifolia 1.4%±0.02; Callistemon polandii 0.2%±0.00; C. citrinus
1.1%±0.06; C. viminalis 0.3±0.00% and Kunzea ericoides 0.5%±0.07.
The chemical compositions of the volatile oils produced by
each one of the seven studied species are presented in Table 1. The
essential oils of K. ericoides demonstrated a larger predominance
of monoterpenes (66.8%), being the main component α-pinene
106 Silva et al. Quim. Nova

(54.5%). The oils of Melaleuca and Callistemon are composed in
great part by oxygenated monoterpenoids (Table 1). However, the
volatile oil of M. linariifolia is characterized by a high concentra-
tion of methyleugenol (86.8%) and traces of E-methylisoeugenol
(0.4%). Compared with the oils of a M. leucadendra chemotype
from Australia (methyleugenol and E-methylisoeugenol up to 99%
and 88% respectively)31 and Brazil (96,6% of methyleugenol),32 it
seems that the investigated oil has economic potential as a source
of methyleugenol, since this compound has an eugenol scent, and
could be used in large scale production of perfumes and as food
aroma.33 The essential oil of M. hypericifolia, C. viminalis and C.
citrinus was characterized by a high amount of 1,8-cineole (88.0,
65.0 and 77.0% respectively). Besides the insecticidal action,
this compound also displays anti-inflammatory activity which
is associated with its capability to inhibit the cyclooxygenase
pathway, preventing prostanoid biosynthesis.34 The high content
of 1,8-cineole in volatile oils of these species suggests that they
can constitute an alternative commercial source of this compound.

Table 1. Chemical constituents of essential oils from Myrtaceae species

CONSTITUENT RRI MHS ML MT CVM CCT CPL KE

α-thujene 930 - - 1.4±0.0 - - 2.0±0.2 0.6±0.0
α-pinene 935 3.0±0.2 - 1.2±0.0 12.0±1.1 3.2±0.1 1.3±0.1 54.5±0.5
β-pinene 979 1.2±0.1 - - - 2.2±0.9 - 1.1±0.0
Myrcene 993 0.1±0.0 - - - 3.3±0.1 0.3±0.0 0.7±0.1
α-felandrene 1004 - 0.9±0.1 - - - 6.0±0.1 -
α-terpinene 1021 - - - - - 7.5±0.2 1.0±0.1
ρ-cymene 1021 - - 27.7±0.3 3.6±0.1 - 7.4±0.4 -
o-cymene 1027 - 1.0±0.3 - - - - -
Limonene 1031 - 1.8±0.3 - - - - -
1,8-cineole d
1041 88.0±0.5 - 7.7±0.3 65.0±2.3 77.0±0.9 - 16.4±0.5
β-(E)-ocinene 1053 - - - - 0.7±0.0 - 0.7±0.2
γ-terpinene d
1065 - - - - 0.7±0.0 16.8±1.6 4.1±0.0
α-terpinolene 1089 - - - - - - 0.9±0.1
Linalool 1103 - 0.6±0.0 - 1.1±0.1 - - 1.5±0.0
E-pinocarveol 1133 - - - 2.3±0.4 - - -
Z-pinene hydrate 1123 - - - - - 0.3±0.1 -
Terpinen-4-ol d
1181 3.3±0.2 0.3±0.0 47.0±0.2 1.4±0.2 0.4±0.0 49.8±1.1 -
p-cimen-8-ol 1187 - - - - - 2.3±0.1 -
α-terpineold 1195 0.2±0.1 0.8±0.0 3.2±0.1 13.0±1.6 8.9±0.4 0.3±0.1 5.7±0.1
Not identified 1261 - - 4.2±0.2 - - - -
Methyl eugenol d
1415 - 86.8±0.3 - - - - -
E-cariophyllene 1424 - - - - 0.4±0.1 - -
Aromadendrene 1443 0.1±0.3 - - - - - -
α-humulene 1450 - 0.5±0.2 - - - - -
Germancrene D 1477 - 1.4±0.6 - - - - -
Bicyclogermacrene 1494 - 0.9±0.2 - - - - 3.2±0.3
E-methylisoeugenol 1506 - 0.4±0.1 - - - - -
Ledol 1566 - - - 1.5±0.7 - - 0.4±0.0
Spathulenol 1585 0.1±0.1 0.3±0.1 - - 0.5±0.1 - 1.0±0.0
Globulol 1591 0.1±0.0 - - - 0.4±0.1 - -
Viridiflorol 1585 - - - - - - 3.3±0.0
Yield (%) 96.1 95.7 92.4 99.9 97.7 94.0 95.1
Monoterpene Hydro-
4.4/91.7 6.5/2.0 30.3/57.9 15.6/84.3 10.5/87.2 41.6/52.4 66.8/28.3
carbons/ Oxygenated
Others - 87.2 4.2 - - - -
RRI: relative retention indices relative to C9-C27 n-alkanes on a DB5 column. MHS = Melaleuca hypericifolia, ML= M. linariifolia; MT= M. thymifolia;
CVM = Callistemon viminalis; CCT = C. citrinus; CPL = C. polandii; KE = Kunzea ericoides
Vol. 33, No. 1 Chemical composition and antibacterial activities 107

The essential oil of M. thymifolia and C. polandii presented antimicrobial potentials, the essential oil from this species showed low
terpinen-4-ol as the major component (47.0 and 49.8% respectively). activity. Likewise, the essential oils of K. ericoides, mainly composed
Terpinen-4-ol is one of the major and active components of Tea Tree of monoterpene hydrocarbons especially to its majority component,
Oil (TTO), the volatile oil steam distilled from M. alternifolia, and α-pinene (54.5%) presented a very weak antibacterial activity. α-Pinene
of great commercial value.35 The main component of the essential seem to be able to disintegrate the cellular integrity, and causes inhibition
oil of Kunzea ericoides is α-pinene (54.5%). This substance is used of respiration and ion transportation process.37 Cerqueira et al.38 studied
as a precursor for the preparation of synthetic mosquito repellents36 the essential oil of Myrcia myrtifolia (Myrtaceae) that presents 87.3% of
with low toxicity to humans. α-pinene and showed strong activity against S. aureus, methicilin resis-
The evaluation of antimicrobial activity by the Agar disc diffusion tant S. aureus and C. albicans. Some studies have concluded that whole
method showed that the volatile oils isolated from the seven studied essential oils have a greater antibacterial activity than the major compo-
species showed different levels of antibacterial activity (Table 2). In nents mixed,39 which suggests that the minor components are critical to
general these oils were less active than most of the antibiotics evalu- the activity and may have a synergistic effect or potentiating influence.
ated. With exception of M. thymifolia, the volatile oils from all other Besides, the mode of action of the essential oil seems depending on the
species exhibited low activity. The essential oil of M. thymifolia was bacterial strain. Furthermore, it is also noteworthy that synergistic and/or
the most active against all bacteria. It was more active against S. au- antagonistic effects might be taken intoaccount for the activity observed
reus than Gentamicin and Streptomycin. The antimicrobial activity of in complex mixtures, such as essential oils.40
the oil of M. thymifolia was evaluated by determining of the minimal The essential oils from M. thymifolia and C. polandii presented
inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentra- terpinen-4-ol as the major component (47.0 and 49.8% for respec-
tion (MBC). The results are presented in Table 3 and indicated that tively), but M. thymifolia showed the best activity. The essential
the oil exhibited strong activity against all microorganisms tested. oil produced by M. thymifolia contained just one compounds that
were not observed in the oils of C. polandii (1,8-cineol 7.7%), and
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Myrtaceae species
contained p-cymene in higher concentration (27.7%) (Table 1). p-
Inhibition zone diameter (mm) Cymene is a biological precursor of carvacrol and is hydrophobic.
This compound causes swelling of the cytoplasmic membrane to a
Microorganisms G(-) G(+)
greater extent than does carvacrol.41 But p-Cymene is not an effec-
E. coli S. aureus B. cereus tive antibacterial when used alone.42 When combined with carvacrol,
Essential Oil synergism has been observed.43 The best antimicrobial activity of the
essential oils from M. thymifolia might be attributed to a synergistic
M. linariifolia 08.0 Af 09.0 Ai 09.0 Af action of other compounds present in the oil.
M. hypericifolia 10.0 Af 08.0 Ai 10.6 Ae In conclusion, the results described demonstrate the promising
M. thymifolia 22.8 Ac 19.9 Bg 23.6 Ab possibility of using of the essential oils from M. thymifolia as an
alternative to some antibiotics against Gram (+) and Gram (-) bacteria.
C. viminalis 13.0 Ae 08.6 Bi 13.6 Ad
C. polandii 08.8 Af 08.7 Ai 10.3 Ae REFERENCES
C. citrinus 07.5 Af 09.2 Ai 08.6 Af
1. Essawi, T.; Srour, M.; J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 70, 343.
K. ericoides 06.0 Bg 09.7 Ai 10.3 Ae 2. Kaferstein, F. K.; Mortarjemi, Y.; Bettcher, D. W.; Emerg. Infect. Dis.
Standards 1997, 3, 503.
3. Nychas, G. J. E. In New methods of food preservation; Gould, G. W.,
Vancomycin 30 µg 12.7 Be 24.3 Af 13.0 Bd
ed.; Blackie Academic Professional: London, 1995, p. 58.
Penicillin G 10 UI 07.7 Bf * 51.3 Aa 08.3 Bf 4. Craven, L. A.; Lepschi, B. J.; Aust. Syst. Bot. 1999, 12, 819.
Erythromycin 15 µg 06.0 Cg* 31.3 Ae 18.0 Bc 5. Caldefie-Chezet, F.; Fusillier, C.; Jarde, T.; Laroye, H.; Damez, M.;
Vasson, M. P.; Guillot, J.; Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 364.
Gentamicin 10 µg 16.0 Bd 17.7 Bg 19.7 Ac 6. Bagg, A. J.; Jackson, M. S.; Sweeney, M. P.; Ramage, G.; Davies, A. N.;
Streptomycin 10 µg 16.0 Bd 15.0 Bh 24.0 Ab Oral Oncol. 2006, 42, 487.
Control 06.0 Ag 06.0 Aj 06.0 Ag 7. Iori, A.; Grazioli, D.; Gentile, E.; Marano, G.; Salvatore, G.; Vet. Para-
sitol. 2005, 129, 173.
Means followed by same capital letter in the lines and small letter in the col- 8. Minami, M.; Kita, M.; Nakaya, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Kuriyama, H.; Ima-
umns are not different for the Scott-Knott’s test at P ≤ 0.05. * resistant strain. nishi, J.; Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 47, 681.
9. Hussein, S. A. M.; Hashim, A. N. M.; El-Sharawy, R. T.; Seliem, M. A.;
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bacteri- Linscheid, M.; Lindequist, U.; Nawwar, M. A. M.; Phytochemistry 2007,
cidal concentration data (% v/v) obtained by microdilution method 68, 1464.
of M. thymifolia essential oil 10. Carson, C. F.; Riley, T. V.; Cookson, B. D.; J. Hosp. Infect. 1998, 40,
Bacteria 175.
11. Giordani, C.; Molinari, A.; Toccacieli, L.; Calcabrini, A.; Stringaro,
E. coli S. aureus B. cereus A.; Chistolini, P.; Arancia, G.; Diociaiuti, M.; J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49,
MIC 0.0625 0.0625 0.0625 4581.
12. Budhiraja, S. S.; Cullum, M. E.; Sioutis, S. S.; Evangelista, L.; Habano-
MBC 0.125 0.0310 0.125
va, S. T.; J. Manipul. Physiol. Therap. 1999, 22, 447.
13. Wendy, W. J. S.; Ahmed, H. F.; Thomas, V. R.; Verbrugh, H.; Belkum,
Although the volatile oils obtained from M. hypericifolia, Calliste- A.; J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 59, 553.
mon viminalis and C. citrinus have high content of 1,8-cineole (88.0, 14. Mondello, F.; De-Bernardis, F.; Girolamo, A.; Salvatore, G.; Cassone,
65.0 and 77.0% respectively), a well known compound with pronounced A.; J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 1223.
108 Silva et al.
15. Caelli, M.; Porteous, J.; Carson, C. F.; Heller, R.; Riley, T. V.; J. Hosp.
Infectol. 2000, 46, 236.
16. Juergens, U. R.; Dethlefsen, U.; Steinkamp, G.; Gillissen, A.; Repges,
R.; Vetter, H.; Respir. Med. 2003, 97, 250.
17. Porter, N. G.; Wilkins, A. L.; Phytochemistry 1998, 50, 407.
18. Khambay, B. P. S.; Beddie, D. G.; Simmonds, M. S. J.; Phytochemistry
2002, 59, 5969.
19. Mabberley, D. J.; The Plant-Book. A portable dictionary of the higher
plants, 4th ed., Cambridge University Press: New York, 1993; Craven, L.
A. In Tea Tree: The Genus Melaleuca; Southwell, I. A.; Lowe, R., eds.;
Harwood Academic Publ.: Australia, 1999, p. 11.
20. Khambay, B. P. S.; Beddie, D. G.; Hooper, A. M.; Simmonds, M. S. J.;
Green, P. W. C.; J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 1666.
21. Last, D. I.; Llewellyn, D. J.; New Zealand J. Bot. 1997, 35, 385.
22. Chohan, Z. H.; Pervez, H.; J. Nat. Sci. Math. 1999, 39, 157.
23. Sudhakar, M.; Raju, D. B.; Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2005, 3, 513.
24. Martins, E. R.; Casali, V. W. D.; Barbosa, L. C. A.; Carazza, F.; J. Braz.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 8, 29 ; Barbosa F. D. F.; Barbosa, L. C. A.; Melo, E.
C.; Botelho, F. M.; Quim. Nova 2006, 29, 122; Martins, F. T.; Santos,
M. H.; Pólo, M.; Barbosa, L. C. A.; Quim. Nova 2006, 29, 1203; Castro,
H. G.; Oliveira, L. O.; Barbosa, L. C. A.; Ferreira, F. A.; Silva, D. J. L.;
Mosquim, P. R.; Nascimento, E. A.; Quim. Nova 2004, 27, 55; Barbosa,
L. C. A.; Demuner, A. J.; Teixeira, R. R.; Madruga, M. S.; Fitoterapia
1999, 70, 152; Barbosa, L. C. A.; Paula, V. F.; Azevedo, A. S.; Silva, E.
M. M.; Nascimento, E. A.; Flavour Frag. J. 2005, 20, 39; Silva, A. F.;
Barbosa, L. C. A.; Nascimento, E.; Casali, V. W. D.; J. Essent. Oil Res.
2000, 12, 725; Fonsceca, M. C. M.; Barbosa, L. C. A.; Nascimento, E.
A.; Casali, V. W. D.; J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 345.
25. American Society of Agricultural Engineers; Standards Engineering
Practices Data, Moisture Measurement ASAE S358.2 DEC99, Forages,
2000.
26. van den Dool, H., Kratz, P. D. J.; J. Chromatogr. 1963, 11, 463.
27. Adams R. P.; Identification of essential oil components by gas
chromatography/mass spectroscopy, Allured Publishing Corporation:
Illinois, 1995.
Quim. Nova
28. Salustiano, V. C.; Andrade, N. J.; Soares, N. F. F.; Lima, J. C.;
Bernardes, P. C.; Luiz, L. M. P.; Fernandes, P. E.; Food Control 2009,
20, 439.
29. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; Performance
standards for antimicrobial susceptibility test. Ninth International
Supplement, M100-S9, NCCLS: Wayne, 1997.
30. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; Performance
standards for antimicrobial susceptibility test. Ninth International
Supplement. M100-S9, Wayne, PA. 1999; Carson, C. F.; Hammer, K.
A.; Riley, T.V.; Microbios 1995, 82, 181.
31. Brophy, J. J.; Lassak, E. V.; Flav. Frag. J. 1988, 3, 43.
32. Silva, C. J.; Barbosa, L. C. A. B.; Maltha, C. R. A.; Pinheiro, A. L.;
Ismail, F. M. D.; Flav. Frag. J. 2007, 22, 474.
33. Halcon, L; Milkus, K.; Am. J. Infect. Control. 2004, 32, 402.
34. Dewhirst, F. E.; Prostaglandins 1980, 20, 209.
35. Altman, P. M.; Aust. J. Pharm. 1988, 69, 276.
36. Wang, Z.; Song. J.; Chen, J.; Song, Z.; Shang, S.; Jiangd, Z.; Han, Z.;
Bioorg. Medic. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2854.
37. Sikkema, J.; de Bont, J. A. M.; Poolman, B.; J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269,
8022; Cox, S. D.; Mann, C. M.; Karkham, J. L.; Bell, H. C.; Gustafson, J.
E.; Warmington, J. R.; Wyllie, S. G.; J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 170.
38. Cerqueira, M. D.; Souza-Neta, L. C.; Passos, M. G. V. M.; Lima, E. O.;
Roque, N. F.; Martins, D.; Guedes, M. L. S.; Cruz, F. G.; J. Braz. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 18, 998.
39. Gill, A. O.; Delaquis, P.; Russo, P.; Holley, R. A.; Int. J. Food Microbiol.
2002, 73, 83; Mourey, A.; Canillac, N.; Food Control 2002, 13, 289.
40. Kelen, M.; Tepe, B.; Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4096.
41. Ultee, A.; Bennink, M. H. J.; Moezelaar, R.; Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
2002, 68, 1561.
42. Juven, B. J.; Kanner, J.; Schved, F.; Weisslowicz, H.; J. Appl. Bacteriol.
1994, 76, 626; Dorman, H. J. D.; Deans, S. G.; J. Appl. Bacteriol. 2000,
88, 308; Juliano, C.; Mattana, A.; Usai, M.; J. Essential Oil Res. 2000,
12, 516.
43. Ultee, A.; Kets, E. P. W.; Alberda, M.; Hoekstra, F. A.; Smid, E. J.; Arch.
Microbiol. 2000, 174, 233.