SUMMARY OF COT RATING & ITS CORRESPONDING RPMS 5-POINT SCALE EQUIVALENT

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

COT RATING RPMS 5-POINT SCALE

THE TEACHER: AVERAGE FINAL RATING
FOR QUALITY
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1) Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas
5
2) Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy
skills 5
3) Applies a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other
higher-order thinking skills. 5
4) Manages classroom structure to engage learners individually or in groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning environments.
5

5) Manages learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to

ensure learning-focused environments 5
6) Uses differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learner's
gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences. 5
7) Plans, manages, and implements developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes
to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. 5
8) Selects, develops, organizes, and uses appropriate teaching and learning resources, including
ICT, to address learning goals. 5
9) Designs, selects, organizes, and uses diagnostic, formative and summative assessment
strategies consistent with curriculum requirements. 5

RANGE RPMS 5-POINT RATING SCALE

4.500 - 5.000 5 (Outstanding)
3.500 - 4.499 4 (Very Satisfactory)
2.500 - 3.499 3 (Satisfactory)
1.500 - 2.499 2 (Unsatisfactory)
below 1.499 1 (Poor)
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review: December 30, 1899
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of June 2018- 22.50% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No acceptable
Education Knowledge and content within and April 2019 of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its evidence was
Services Pedagogy across curriculum integration within integration within integration within integration within shown
teaching areas. and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

4 lessons using lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was
MOV 1 and 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
of the given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018- Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Education teaching strategies that April 2019 different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
Services enhance learner strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
achievement in literacy promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading,
and numeracy skills. writing, and/or writing, and/or writing, and/or writing, and/or
numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lesson as evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the
and supported by and supported by and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness

Page 2 of 8
 Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018- Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to April 2019 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Services develop critical and that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
creative thinking, as well and creative and creative and creative and creative
as other higher-order thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
thinking skills. other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

4 lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any 1 of the given shown
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom June 2018- 22.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Environment structure to engage April 2019 management management management management evidence was
Services and Diversity of learners, inidividually or strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
Learners in groups, in meaningful engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
exploration, discovery activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
and hands-on activities shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
within a range of with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
physical learning
environments.

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

4 lessons lessons supported lessons supported supported by any evidence was
supported by MOV by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any of the acceptable shown
1 and any 1 of the 1 of the other 1 of the other MOV
other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner June 2018- Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Education behavior constructively April 2019 management management management management evidence was
Services by applying positive and strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of shown
non-violent discipline to learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
ensure learning-focused that promote that promote that promote that promote
environments. positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
violent discipline as violent discipline as violent discipline as violent discipline as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Page 3 of 8
 Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
4 of the given 4 of the given 4 of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
observed in at least observed in at least observed in at least 1 lesson
4 lessons 3 lessons 2 lessons

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated, June 2018- Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Education developmentally April 2019 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
Services appropriate learning teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
experiences to address to address learner to address learner to address learner to address learner
learners' gender, needs, diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
strengths, interests and in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
experiences. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

4 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown
in at least 2 lessons in at least 2 lessons in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 and supported by any 1 of the
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
of the other of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed June 2018- 22.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Education and Planning and implemented April 2019 implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
sequenced teaching and sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
learning processes to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
meet curriculum learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
requirements and varied shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
teaching contexts. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Page 4 of 8
 Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable
Education collegial discussions that April 2019 participated in participated in participated in in LACs/FGDs/ evidence was
Services use teacher and learner LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss shown
feedback to enrich meetings to discuss meetings to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
teaching practice teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instructions as
instructions as instructions as instructions as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
meetings as meetings as meetings as as evidently shown shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in any 1 of the
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given given MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, developed, June 2018- Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education organized and used April 2019 used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
Services appropriate teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
and learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
including ICT, to address including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning goals. address learning address learning address learning address learning
goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
4 varied teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
and learning learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
including ICT, as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
evidently shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
MOV 1 and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 of the acceptable of the acceptable
of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Page 5 of 8
 Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, June 2018- 22.50% Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
Education and Reporting organized and used April 2019 organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
Services diagnostic, formative diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
and summative formative and formative and formative and formative and
assessment strategies summative summative summative summative
consistent with assessment assessment assessment assessment
curriculum strategies strategies strategies strategies
requirements. consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 varied assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was
assessment tools as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown
evidently shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable
Education evaluated learner April 2019 monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
Services progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement using progress and progress and progress and and achievement
learner attainment data. achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed were completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Basic 12. Communicated June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable
Education promptly and clearly the April 2019 showed prompt prompt and clear showed prompt prompt and clear evidence was
Services learners' needs, and clear communication of and clear communication of shown
progress and communication of the learners' needs, communication of the learners' needs,
achievement to key the learners' needs, progress and the learners' needs, progress and
stakeholders, including progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
parents/guardians. achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
stakeholders, including stakeholders, including
including parents/guardians including parents/guardians
parents/guardians as shown in the parents/guardians as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Page 6 of 8
 Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed were completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various June 2018- 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Education related works/activities April 2019 performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
Services that contribute to the related related related work/activities that shown
teaching-learning work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
process. contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

4 different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown

Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL

0.000
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

CORAZON C. TINGSON, CESE

Rater Ratee Officer-in-charge
Office of the Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority

Page 7 of 8
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review: December 30, 1899
Rating Period:

NUMERICAL RATINGS
KRA WEIGHT PER KRA OBJECTIVES WEIGHT PER OBJECTIVES SCORE
Q E T AVERAGE
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5%
Objective 12 7.5%

PLUS FACTOR 10% Objective 13 10% 0

FINAL RATING 0.000

ADJECTIVAL RATING

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

CORAZON C. TINGSON, CESE

Rater Ratee Officer-in-charge
Office of the Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority