Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Steroids
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/steroids

First synthesis and characterization for the stereoisomers of Ulipristal


acetate
Yi Zhao a, Xiaolong Li a, Hong Liu b, Yongguo Yu a, Li Hai a, Li Guo a,⇑, Yong Wu a,⇑
a
Key Laboratory of Drug Targeting and Drug Delivery Systems, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, PR China
b
West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, PR China

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The three stereoisomers, 11a,17a-isomer I, 11a,17b-isomer II and 11b,17b-isomer III are related
Received 15 June 2014 substances of the selective progesterone receptor modulator Ulipristal acetate. Herein, we presented
Received in revised form 29 October 2014 an efficient and practical synthesis approach to deliver these three stereoisomers for the first time, and
Accepted 12 December 2014
also confirmed the structure of the key intermediate 5a by single-crystal X-ray analysis. Our research will
Available online 30 December 2014
be of immense help for organic chemists to study the impurity profile of Ulipristal acetate.
Ó 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Ulipristal acetate
Stereoisomer
Synthesis
X-ray structure
Impurity

1. Introduction Therefore, several methods have been developed so far for the
synthesis of Ulipristal acetate [5–9]. However, two chiral centers
The presence of impurities, especially chiral impurities in an in the Ulipristal acetate molecule from the starting materials can
active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) has a significant impact give rise to four stereoisomers including Ulipristal acetate (Fig. 2)
on the quality and safety of the drug products. Therefore, it is nec- [5,8,9]. Thus, the synthesis of the final product with the required
essary to study the impurity profiles of any API and try to control it stereochemistry is a significant challenge. Furthermore, these ster-
during the manufacturing of a drug product. As per the Interna- eoisomers play essential roles for the preparation of Ulipristal ace-
tional Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines any impuri- tate and also for the quality control of bulk drugs and drug
ties, which are forming at a level of P0.10% with respect to the formulations. In this report, we have designed and synthesized
API, should be identified, synthesized and characterized thor- the stereoisomers of Ulipristal acetate. More importantly, the con-
oughly [1,2]. figuration of each isomer was also confirmed.
17a-Acetoxy-11b-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-
4,9-diene-3,20-dione (Ulipristal, EllaÒ, VA-2914 or CDB-2914, Fig. 1)
is a well-known, more specific 19-norprogesterone and a selective 2. Experimental
progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) which efficiently binds
and inhibits progesterone receptor (PR) in progesterone target tissues All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere. Most
[3]. Ulipristal acetate is well characterized for its anti-fertility chemicals and solvents were analytical grade and used without fur-
potency in several of in vivo and in vitro assays. Different from the ther purification. TLC was performed using precoated silica gel
active metabolites, Ulipristal acetate expresses less antiglucocorti- GF254 (0.2 mm), while column chromatography was performed
coid activity compared with the most well-known SPRM and mifepri- using silica gel (100–200 mesh). The melting point was measured
stone Besides, it also exhibits benefits for endometriosis treatment, as on an YRT-3 melting point apparatus (Shantou Keyi instrument &
well as ovarian and breast cancer therapies [4]. Equipment Co. Ltd., Shantou, China). IR spectra were obtained on a
Perkin Elmer 983 (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). 1H NMR spectra
were taken on a Varian INOVA 400 (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using
⇑ Corresponding authors. Tel.: +86 028 85503235 (Y. Wu), +86 028 85503777 CDCl3, d-DMSO and D2O as solvent. Chemical shifts are expressed in
(L. Guo). d (ppm), with tetramethylsilane (TMS) functioning as the internal
E-mail addresses: guoli@scu.edu.cn (L. Guo), wyong@scu.edu.cn (Y. Wu). reference, and coupling constants (J) were expressed in Hz. Mass

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2014.12.009
0039-128X/Ó 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
8 Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16

spectra were recorded on an Agilent 1946B ESI-MS instrument (Agi- of the reagent was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stir-
lent, Palo Alto, CA, USA). red for an additional 2 h while it was cooling to room temperature.
(1) Synthesis of the key intermediate 5: The mixture was then added dropwise to a suspension of 3b (7.0 g,
0.02 mol) and copper (I) chloride (0.6 g, 0.002 mol) in dry tetrahy-
2.1. 3,3-(Ethylene-dioxy)-5b,10b-epoxyestr-9(11)-ene-17-one(2b) drofuran (70 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h,
then, it was poured into 10% ammonium chloride (70 mL) solution
Hexachloroacetone (14.5 mL, 0.0954 mol), 30% aqueous hydro- and extracted with methylene chloride (3  50 mL). The combined
organic fractions were washed with water (4  50 mL), dried over
gen peroxide (14.1 mL, 0.477 mol) and sodium phosphate dibasic
dodecahydrate (34.5 g, 0.0964 mol) were added to methylene chlo- sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give a black
oil (21.1 g). The oil was purified via column chromatography
ride (300 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at the same
temperature. The material 1 (30 g, 0.0954 mol) was added to above (petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 10:1) to yield 5.23 g (55%) light
blue solid. mp: 162–164 °C, MS (m/z): 478.62 [M + H]+, Analysis
mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred for another 18 h at the
same temperature. Then, it was poured into a mixture of methy- calculated for C30H39NO4: C 75.44, H 8.23, N 2.93; found: C
75.55, H 8.28, N 2.75. 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}:
lene chloride (200 mL) and ice (160 g). A solution of sodium thio-
sulfate (79 g, 0.5 mol) in water (300 mL) was added dropwise to 0.970 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.842–2.332 (m, 18H), 2.474 (s, 1H, acetylenic
the mixture to destroy the excess of hydrogen peroxide. After sep- hydrogen), 2.923 (s, 6H, NACH3), 3.716 (t, 1H, J = 6.4, CH), 3.820–
aration, the organic fraction was washed with water (2  100 mL) 4.022(m, 4H, OACH2), 6.680(d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH), 7.048 (d, 2H,
and dried on sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed in vacuo to J = 8.4, ArAH).
give 32 g (100%) of product, which was a 65:35 mixture of the
5a,10a- and 5b,10b-epoxides showed by HPLC. The obtained crude 2.4. 11a-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-17a-ethynyl-17b-
mixture of epoxides was recrystallized with petroleum ether/ethyl hydroxyestr-4,9-diene-3-one(5)
acetate (5:1) to get 12.8 g (40%) white solid 2a. The filtrate was
concentrated in vacuo to yield 19.2 g (60%) of a 42:58 mixture of To a solution of potassium bisulfate (3.7 g, 0.027 mol) in water
the 5a,10a- and 5b,10b-epoxides. Then the mixture was purified (50 mL) was added compound 4b (5 g, 0.01 mol) at 0 °C. The mix-
via column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 10:1) ture was stirred for 5 h and almost became clear. Then, saturated
to give 6.91 g (36%) white solid 2b. mp: 158–160 °C, MS (m/z): sodium bicarbonate was added to the above mixture to adjust
331.42 [M + H]+, Analysis calculated for C20H26O4: C 72.70, H pH to 7–8. The precipitated crystals were filtered off and dried at
7.93; found: C 72.80, H 7.89. 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d 50 °C to yield 2.7 g (65%) of the title compound 5. mp: 134–
(ppm)}: 0.861 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.201–2.511 (m, 18H), 3.796–3.961 136 °C, MS (m/z): 416.58 [M + H]+, Analysis calculated for
(m, 4H, OACH2), 5.851 (d, 1H, J = 2.8, @CH). C28H33NO2: C 80.93, H 8.00, N 3.37; found: C 80.85, H 8.18,
N3.28. 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 1.005 (s, 3H,
2.2. 3,3-(Ethylene-dioxy)-17a-ethynyl-17b-hydroxy-5b,10b- CH3), 1.396–2.628 (m, 16H), 2.476 (s, 1H, acetylenic hydrogen),
epoxyestr-9(11)-ene (3b) 2.920 (s, 6H, NACH3), 3.899 (t, 1H, J = 8.8, CH), 5.664 (s, 1H,
@CH), 6.680 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH), 6.952 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH).
Under argon, 2b (6.8 g, 0.02 mol) was dissolved in dry tetrahy- (2) Synthesis of 11a,17a-isomer I:
drofuran (70 mL) at 0 °C, and sodium acetylide (1.9 g, 0.04 mol)
was added. The mixture was stirred for 1 h. Saturated ammonium 2.5. 11a-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-21-(phenyl-sulfinyl)-19-
chloride solution (50 mL) and water (50 mL) were added, then, the norpregna-4,9,17(20),20-tetraene-3-one (6)
reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min. Then the reaction mixture
was concentrated to a volume of 80 mL. The residue was stirred for To a suspension of compound 5 (1.5 g, 0.0036 mol), triethyl-
3 h at 0 °C. The precipitated crystals were filtered off and dried at amine (2.2 mL, 0.0152 mol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (20 mL), a solu-
50 °C to yield 7.3 g (100%) of the title compound 3b, mp: tion of phenylsulfenyl chloride (0.9 g, 0.0062 mol) in dry
154–156 °C, MS (m/z): 379.48 [M + Na]+, Analysis calculated for tetrahydrofuran (15 mL) was added dropwise while keeping the
C22H28O4: C 74.13, H 7.92; found: C 74.21, H 7.89. 1H NMR temperature between 70 and 78 °C. The reaction mixture was
{400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.825 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.081– stirred for 4 h at 78 °C, then water (20 mL) and methanol
2.627 (m, 18H), 2.557 (s, 1H, acetylenic hydrogen), 3.867– (20 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min
3.946(m, 4H, OACH2), 5.890 (t, 1H, J = 4.4, @CH). and extracted with methylene chloride (3  40 mL). The combined
organic fractions were washed with water (4  20 mL), dried over
2.3. 3,3-(Ethylene-dioxy)-5b,17b-dihydroxy-11a-(4-N,N- sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to get 2.5 g of a
dimethylaminophenyl)-19-nor-17a-pregn-9-ene-21-ethyne(4b) reddish brown oil. The oil was purified via column chromatogra-
phy (petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 5:1) to yield 1.18 g (62.5%) of
Under anhydrous conditions, a portion (2 mL) of a solution of white solid. mp: 151–155 °C. MS (m/z): 546.78 [M + Na]+, Analysis
4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline (12 g, 0.06 mol) in dry tetrahydrofu- calculated for C34H37NO2S: C77.97, H 7.12, N 2.67, S 6.12; found: C
ran (50 mL) and one crystal of iodine was added to the mixture of 77.84, H 7.21, N 2.75, S 6.18. 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d
magnesium (1.7 g, 0.07 mol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (5 mL) at (ppm)}: 1.042 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.213–2.767 (m, 16H), 2.900 (s, 6H,
50 °C. After evidence of reaction was observed, the entire amount NACH3), 3.967 (t, 1H, J = 8.8, CH), 5.681 (s, 1H, @CH), 6.075 (s,
1H, @CH), 6.634 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH), 6.888 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH),
7.460–7.539 (m, 3H, ArAH), 7.626 (d, 2H, J = 7.2, ArAH).
N
O
OAc 2.6. 11a-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-17a-hydroxy-19-norpregna-
4,9-diene-3,20-dione(7)

O
Compound 6 (1.1 g, 0.0021 mol) was added to a solution of
sodium methoxide (0.11 g, 0.0021 mol) in methanol (20 mL). The
Fig. 1. The structures of Ulipristal acetate. reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 1 h, then trimethyl
Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16 9

N N N
O O O
OAc OAc OAc

O O O
I II III

Fig. 2. The stereoisomers of Ulipristal acetate.

O O O

1) recrystallization
H 2O2, (Cl 3C)2CO 2) Column chromatography
O O O + O O
Na2HPO 4/CH 2Cl2
O O 2a O 2b 21.6%
rt, 12h, 100%
1
5α,10α : 5β,10β
65 : 35
N
HO 1) N
HO
MgBr
sodium acetylide CuCl, THF, 0 oC, 5h
2b
THF, 0oC, 4h, 100% O O 2) NH 4Cl, CH2Cl2/H2O,
rt, 55% O
O 3b
O OH
4b

N
HO

KHSO4 /H2 O,0o C, 4h


65%

O
5

Scheme 1. Synthesis of the key intermediate 5 [5,9].

O
N HC S
C
SCl
1)P(OCH 3)3 /NaOCH 3/CH 3OH
5
triethylamine/THF/-78 oC 2)1.0 M HCl/CH3OH, 0.5h, 54.8%
4h, 62.5% 6
O

N O N
HO O

Ac2O/HClO 4 OAc

CH 2Cl2, -20 oC,


3h, 86%
O O
7 I

Scheme 2. Synthesis of 11a,17a-isomer I [9].

phosphite (0.4 g, 0.0032 mol) was added and stirring was contin- the mixture was extracted with methylene chloride (3  20 mL).
ued at 70 °C for 2 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 20 °C The combined organic fractions were washed with water
and poured into water (25 mL), then extracted with methylene (2  20 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated
chloride (3  30 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried in vacuo to get 1.6 g of reddish brown oil. The obtained crude prod-
over sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give uct was purified via column chromatography (petroleum ether–
2.12 g of reddish brown oil. The oil was dissolved in a mixture of ethyl acetate 10:1) to yield 0.5 g (54.8%) off-white syrupy. MS
1 N hydrochloric acid (1.3 mL) and methanol (20 mL), then stirred (m/z): 434.58 [M + H]+, Analysis calculated for C28H35NO3: C
at room temperature for 30 min. Ice water (200 mL) was added to 77.56, H 8.14, N 3.23; found: C 77.62, H 8.21, N 3.28. 1H NMR
the mixture. After neutralizing with saturated sodium bicarbonate, {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.881(s, 3H, CH3), 1.232–2.787
10 Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16

(m, 16H), 2.258 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.914 (s, 6H, NACH3), 3.867 (t, 1H, 2.9. 11a,17b-Isomer II (Scheme 3)
J = 9.2, CH), 5.663 (s, 1H, @CH), 6.673 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH), 6.934
(d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH). Perchloric acid (0.4 mL, 0.0044 mol) was added to acetic anhy-
dride (2 mL, 0.0212 mol) by dropwise at 10 °C. The obtained solu-
tion was stirred for an additional 1 h, then cooled to 30 °C and the
2.7. 11a,17a-Isomer I solution of compound 8 (0.8 g, 0.002 mol) in dry dichloromethane
(20 mL) was added at such rate to keep the temperature between
Perchloric acid (0.1 mL, 0.0011 mol) was added to acetic anhy- 10 °C and 20 °C, then the reaction mixture was stirred at this
dride (0.5 mL, 0.0053 mol) by dropwise at 10 °C. The obtained temperature for 3 h. The mixture was diluted with dichlorometh-
solution was stirred for an additional 1 h, then, cooled to 20 °C ane (20 mL) and poured into water (20 mL) containing sodium ace-
and the solution of compound 7 (0.2 g, 0.0005 mol) in dry dichloro- tate (5.6 g, 0.068 mol). The organic layer was separated, washed
methane (10 mL) was added at such rate to keep the temperature with water (3  10 mL), dried over sodium sulfate and concen-
between 10 and 20 °C, then the reaction mixture was stirred at trated under reduced pressure to give 1.12 g of slightly yellow syr-
this temperature for 3 h. The mixture was diluted with dichloro- upy. The syrupy was purified via column chromatography
methane (10 mL) and poured into water (10 mL) containing (petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 15:1) to yield 0.84 g (86%) of
sodium acetate (1.4 g, 0.017 mol). The organic layer was separated, slightly yellow syrupy. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): cmax 2933;
washed with water (3  10 mL), dried over sodium sulfate and 1731 and 1722(AC@O); 1669 and 1658 (conjugated AC@O);
concentrated under reduced pressure to give 0.22 g of slightly yel- 1568; 1531; 1455; 1371; 1332; 1262; 1222; 1171; HRMS: calcu-
low syrupy. The syrupy was purified via column chromatography lated for C30H37NO4 475.6191, found: 475.6178. 1H NMR
(petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 15:1) to yield 0.19 g (86%) of {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.979 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.193–
slightly yellow syrupy. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): cmax 2923; 2.683 (m, 16H), 1.609 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.072 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.917
1721 and 1718 (AC@O); 1673 and 1662 (conjugated AC@O); (s, 6H, NACH3), 3.850 (t, 1H, J = 8.0), 5.687 (s, 1H, CH), 6.666 (d,
1575; 1528; 1448; 1362; 1313; 1259; 1212; 1178; HRMS: calcu- 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH), 6.989 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH); 13C NMR
lated for C30H37NO4 475.6191, found: 475.6165. 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}:21.195; 24.087; 25.684;
{400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.797 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.256– 26.754; 27.789; 30.168; 30.998; 36.676; 36.789; 38.257; 39.268;
2.658 (m, 16H), 2.024 (s, 6H, COCH3), 2.945 (s, 6H, NACH3), 40.485; 46.981; 50.848; 66.986; 96.120; 112.689; 122.845;
3.905 (t, 1H, J = 9.2, CH), 5.686 (s, 1H, @CH), 6.710 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, 127.228; 129.187; 131.420; 145.548; 148.528; 156.496; 170.541;
ArAH), 6.982 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH); 13C NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 199.431; 203.722.
(TMS), d (ppm)}: 21.181; 24.075; 25.668; 26.761; 27.780; 30.165; (4) Synthesis of 11b,17b-isomer III:
30.951; 36.688; 36.748; 38.268; 39.281; 40.479; 46.951; 50.839;
66.989; 96.110; 112.678; 122.851; 127.214; 129.195; 131.398; 2.10. 3,3-(Ethylene-dioxy)-17a-ethynyl-17b-hydroxyestr-5(10),9(11)-
145.525; 148.534; 156.481; 170.517; 199.425; 203.732. diene (9)
(3) Synthesis of 11a,17b-isomer II:
Compound 1 (20 g, 0.0636 mol) was dissolved in dry tetrahy-
drofuran (200 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 0.5 h, and
2.8. 11a-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-17b-hydroxy-19-norpregna- sodium acetylide (6.0 g, 0.1272 mol) was added. After that, the
4,9-diene-3,20-dione(8) reaction mixture was stirred for another 1 h. Saturated ammonium
chloride solution (200 mL) and water (200 mL) were added and the
Compound 5 (1.2 g, 0.0029 mol) was dissolved in a mixture of mixture was stirred for 10 min. Then the reaction mixture was
acetic acid-H2O-30% sulfuric acid (40:8:1, 10 mL), then, mercuric concentrated to a volume of 350 mL. The residue was stirred for
sulfate (0.085 g, 0.0003 mol) was added to above mixture. The reac- 3 h at 0 °C. The precipitated crystals were filtered off and dried at
tion mixture was stirred for 5 h at 60 °C. After neutralizing with sat- 50 °C to yield 20.6 g (95%) of the title compound 9. mp: 145–
urated sodium bicarbonate, the mixture was extracted with 148 °C, MS (m/z): 340.21 [M + H]+, Analysis calculated for
methylene chloride (3  20 mL). The organic layer was separated, C22H28O3: C 77.61, H 8.29; found: C 77.68, H 8.35. 1H NMR
dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.891(s, 3H, CH3), 1.134–2.662
to give 1.0 g of brown oil. The oil was purified via column chroma- (m, 18H), 2.579 (s, 1H, acetylenic hydrogen), 3.881–3.998 (m, 4H,
tography (petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 15:1) to yield 0.82 g OACH2), 5.678 (t, 1H, J = 5.6, @CH).
(65.2%) of a slightly yellow syrupy. MS (m/z): 434.58 [M + H]+, Anal-
ysis calculated for C28H35NO3: C 77.56, H 8.14, N 3.23; found: C 2.11. 17a-Ethynyl-17b-hydroxyestra-4,9-diene-3-one(10)
77.48, H 8.01, N 3.18. 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}:
0.901 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.079 (s, 3H, COCH3), 1.242–2.689 (m, 16H), To a solution of compound 9 (20 g, 0.059 mol) in acetic acid
2.926 (s, 6H, NACH3), 3.811 (t, 1H, J = 7.2, CH), 5.704 (s, 1H, @CH), (200 mL), perchloric acid (10.7 mL, 0.118 mol) was added
6.676 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH), 7.016 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH). dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at room

N O N
O
HO
OAc
HgSO4/H 2SO 4 Ac2O/HClO4
5
CH 2Cl2, -20oC
CH 3COOH/H 2O, 60oC
3h, 88% O
5h, 65.2% O
8 II

Scheme 3. Synthesis of 11a,17b-isomer II [9,10].


Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16 11

O O
OH OH HO

sodium acetylide CH3COOH HgSO4 /H2 SO4


O
THF,0o C,1h O HClO4 ,rt, 0.5h
THF/H2O, 60o C, 5h
O 95% 87% O O
1 O 9 10 79% 11

O O O
HO O HO O HO O
ethylene glycol,
p-toluenesulfonic acid (CF3 )2 CO/H2 O2
O O + O O
triethyl orthoformate O
CH2Cl2 /Na2 HPO4,0o C,18h
CH2Cl2 ,rt, 3h 85.6% O O O
100%
12 13b
13a
5α,10α : 5β,10β
75 : 25

N O N
HO O
1) N MgBr / CuCl/THF,0oC,3h Ac 2O/HClO 4 OAc

2) Saturated NH4Cl/CH2Cl2 ,0oC CH2 Cl 2,


o
-20oC, 4h,
3) ethanol/ 8.5%H2 SO4,0 C, 2h,64% O O
86.9% III
14

Scheme 4. Synthesis of 11b,17b-isomer III [5,9,10].

temperature, then, poured into water (500 mL). The precipitated solid. mp: 185–190 °C, MS (m/z): 403.24 [M + H]+; Analysis calcu-
crystals were filtered off and dried at 50 °C to give 15.21 g (87%) lated for C24H34O5: C 71.61, H 8.51; found: C 71.55, H 8.59; 1H
off-white solid. mp: 181–185 °C, MS (m/z): 297.18 [M + H]+, Anal- NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.905 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.090
ysis calculated for C20H24O2: C 81.04, H 8.16; found: C 80.95, H (s, 3H, CH3), 1.173–2.665 (m, 18H), 2.261 (s, 1H, OH), 3.746–
8.11; 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.879 (s, 3H, 3.819 (m, 1H, AOCH2), 3.933–4.013 (m, 6H, AOCH2), 4.067–4.119
CH3), 1.202–2.658 (m, 18H), 2.587 (s, 1H, acetylenic hydrogen), (m, 1H, AOCH2), 5.588 (t, 1H, J = 5.6, @CH).
5.682 (s, 1H, @CH).
2.14. 3,3,20,20-Bis(ethylene-dioxy)-17b-hydroxy-5a,10a-epoxy-19-
2.12. 17b-Hydroxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (11) norpregna-9(11)-ene (13a) and 3,3,20,20-bis(ethylene-dioxy)-17b-
hydroxy-5b,10b-epoxy-19-norpregna-9(11)-ene (13b)
Compound 10 (15.0 g, 0.0506 mol) was dissolved in tetrahydro-
furan (150 mL), then, 30% sulfuric acid (50 mL), mercuric sulfate Under nitrogen, 30% aqueous hydrogen peroxide (4.4 mL,
(1.44 g, 0.0051 mol) was added to the above mixture. The reaction 0.15 mol) and sodium phosphate dibasic dodecahydrate (11.7 g,
mixture was stirred for 5 h at 60 °C. After neutralizing with satu- 0.033 mol) were added to a solution of hexafluoroacetone
rated sodium bicarbonate, the mixture was extracted with methy- (3.75 mL, 0.03 mol) in methylene chloride (120 mL). The mixture
lene chloride (3  50 mL). The organic layer was separated, dried was stirred for 1 h at 0 °C. Compound 12 (12 g, 0.03 mol) was added
over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure to to above mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred for another 18 h
give brown oil. The oil was purified via column chromatography at the same temperature. Then, it was poured into a mixture of
(petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 10:1) to yield 12.57 g (79%) white methylene chloride (100 mL) and ice (6 g). A solution of sodium
solid. mp: 195–196 °C, MS (m/z): 315.19 [M + H]+, Analysis calcu- thiosulphate (23.7 g, 0.15 mol) in water (150 mL) was added drop-
lated for C20H26O3: C 76.40, H 8.33; found: C 76.45, H 8.41; 1H wise to the mixture to destroy the excess of hydrogen peroxide.
NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.877(s, 3H, CH3), 1.239 After separation, the organic fraction was washed with water
(s, 3H, CH3), 1.363–2.945 (m, 18H), 5.688 (s, 1H, @CH). (2  50 mL) and dried over sodium sulfate. The solvent was
removed in vacuo to give 12.6 g (100%) of product, which was a
75:25 mixture of the 5a,10a- and 5b,10b-epoxides showed by HPLC.
2.13. 3,3,20,20-Bis(ethylene-dioxy)-17b-hydroxy-19-norpregna-
The obtained crude mixture of epoxides was used in the next step
5(10),9(11)-diene (12)
without further purification. MS (m/z): 419.24 [M + H]+; Analysis
calculated for C24H34O6: C 68.87, H 8.19; found: C 68.95, H 8.31;
To a solution of compound 11 (12 g, 0.0382 mol) in methylene 1
H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d (ppm)}: 0.885 (s, 3H, CH3),
chloride (120 mL), ethylene glycol (21.3 mL, 0.382 mol), trimethyl
1.042 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.073–2.641 (m, 18H), 3.751–3.811 (m, 1H,
orthoformate (41.7 mL, 0.382 mol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid
AOCH2), 3.852–4.003(m, 6H, AOCH2), 4.060–4.112 (m, 1H, AOCH2),
(3.3 g, 0.0191 mol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred
5a,10a: 5.830 (t, 1H, J = 6.0, @CH), 5b,10b: (t, 1H, J = 6.0, @CH).
at room temperature for 3 h, then saturated sodium bicarbonate
was added to adjust pH to 7–8. The organic layer was separated,
and the water-course was extracted with methylene chloride 2.15. 11b-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-17b-hydroxy-19-norpregna-
(3  50 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried over 4, 9-diene-3, 20-dione(14)
sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure to give
slightly brown oil. The oil was purified via column chromatography Under anhydrous conditions, a portion (4 mL) of a solution
(petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 20:1) to yield 13.1 g (85.6%) white of 4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline (21 g, 0.105 mol) in dry
12 Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16

tetrahydrofuran (100 mL) and one crystal of iodine was added to the between 10 °C and 20 °C, then the reaction mixture was stirred
mixture of magnesium (2.92 g, 0.12 mol) in dry tetrahydrofuran at this temperature for 4 h. The mixture was diluted with dichloro-
(10 mL) at 50 °C. After evidence of reaction was observed, the entire methane (50 mL) and poured into water (50 mL) containing
amount of the reagent was added dropwise. The reaction mixture sodium acetate (35 g, 0.425 mol). The organic layer was separated,
was stirred for an additional 2 h while it was cooling to room tem- washed with water (3  10 mL), dried over sodium sulfate and
perature. The mixture was then added dropwise to a suspension of concentrated under reduced pressure to give 6.1 g of brown oil.
13a and 13b (12.6 g, 0.03 mol) and copper (I) chloride (0.9 g, The oil was purified via column chromatography (petroleum
0.003 mol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (130 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction ether–ethyl acetate 15:1) to yield 5.17 g (86.9%) of slightly yellow
mixture was stirred for 3 h, then, poured into 10% ammonium chlo- syrupy. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): cmax 2938; 1742 and 1725
ride (70 mL) solution and extracted with methylene chloride (AC@O); 1662 and 1654 (conjugated AC@O); 1571; 1538; 1449;
(3  100 mL). The combined organic fractions were washed with 1379; 1342; 1269; 1242; 1178; HRMS: calculated for C30H37NO4
water (4  50 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and concen- 475.6191, found: 475.6181. 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d
trated in vacuo to give black oil (28.5 g). The obtained oil was dis- (ppm)}: 0.702 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.856–2.813 (m, 16H), 2.090 (s, 3H,
solved in ethanol (200 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere, and 8.5% COCH3), 2.129 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.935(s, 6H, NACH3), 4.278 (t, 1H,
aqueous sulfuric acid (8.9 mL) was added. The reaction mixture J = 6.4, CH), 5.747 (s, 1H, @CH), 6.683 (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH), 7.021
was stirred for 2 h at 70 °C. After neutralizing with saturated sodium (d, 2H, J = 8.4, ArAH); 13C NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d
bicarbonate, the mixture was diluted with water (300 mL), and (ppm)}: 21.184; 24.079; 25.688; 26.765; 27.791; 30.178; 30.988;
extracted with methylene chloride (3  100 mL). The combined 36.687; 36.791; 38.264; 39.271; 40.487; 46.957; 50.854; 66.979;
organic fractions were dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated 96.134; 112.695; 122.851; 127.234; 129.179; 131.442; 145.551;
under reduced pressure to give brown oil. The oil was purified via 148.537; 156.499; 170.554; 199.445; 203.731.
column chromatography (petroleum ether–ethyl acetate 15:1) to
yield 8.3 g (64%) of a light blue syrupy. MS (m/z): 434.26 [M + H]+,
Analysis calculated for C28H35NO3: C 77.56, H 8.14, N 3.23; found: 3. Discussion
C 77.48, H 8.24, N 3.17; 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS), d
(ppm)}: 0.394 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.858–3.042 (m, 16H,), 1.241 (s, 3H, 3.1. The formation of the 11a,17a-isomer I
COCH3), 3.916(s, 6H, NACH3), 4.364 (d, 1H, J = 5.2, CH), 5.767 (s,
1H, @CH), 6.667 (d, 2H, J = 8.0, ArAH), 7.020 (d, 2H, J = 8.0, ArAH). The synthesis of the drug substance was based on the very effi-
cient 1,4-addition (Scheme 5). The 5a,10a-epoxide was converted
2.16. 11b,17b-Isomer III (Scheme 4) into Ulipristal acetate smoothly. But there always had the 5b, 10b-
isomer in the starting material. After a series of reactions, the
Perchloric acid (2.3 mL, 0.025 mol) was added to acetic anhy- 5b,10b-isomer was transformed into the 11a,17a-isomer I
dride (11.8 mL, 0.125 mol) by dropwise at 10 °C. The obtained (Scheme 6). Especially, the contents of 15b was up to 45% in the
solution was stirred for an additional 1 h, then, cooled to 30 °C route reported by Dancsi et al. [8]. In this route, the ratio of 15a
and the solution of compound 14 (5 g, 0.0125 mol) in dry dichloro- and 15b was about 55:45, which was used directly in the next step
methane (50 mL) was added at such rate to keep the temperature without further separation. And there were only three steps to

N
R R

Grignard addition
O O O Ulipristal acetate

O O OH
5α,10α
3a R= 17β−hydroxy, 17α-ethynyl 4a R= 17β− hydroxy, 17α- ethynyl

O O
15a R= 17 α−hydroxy, 17β - O 16a R= 17α− hydroxy, 17β - O
CH 3 CH 3

Scheme 5. Synthesis of Ulipristal acetate.

N
R R N
O
OAc
Grignard addition
O O O
O O OH O
5β,10β
11α,, 17α−
−isomer Ι
3b R= 17β− hydroxy, 17α - ethynyl 4b R= 17 β− hydroxy, 17 α-ethynyl

O O
15b R= 17α− hydroxy, 17β- O 16b R= 17α−hydroxy, 17β- O
CH3 CH 3

Scheme 6. Formation of 11a,17a-isomer I.


Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16 13

O
HC S
C O O
OH OH

1) CH3ONa/P(OCH 3)3
+
O O
2)1.0 M HCl O
O O O
17 18 19

5 steps 5 steps

Ulipristal acetate and 11β,, 17β-isomer III 11α,, 17β- isomer II and 11β,, 17β-isomer III

Scheme 7. Formation of compound 19.

O
HC S N O N O
N HO
C HO
1)P(OCH3) 3 /CH3ONa
+
2)1.0 M HCl
O O
O
20 21 14

Ac 2O
Ac 2O

Ulipristal acetate 11β,, 17β-isomer III

Scheme 8. Formation of compound 14.

O
HC S N O N O
N HO
C HO
1)P(OCH3) 3 /CH3ONa
+
2)1.0 M HCl
O O
O
6 7 8

Ac2O Ac2O

11α,, 17α -isomer I 11α,, 17β -isomer II

Scheme 9. Formation of compound 7 and 8.

obtain Ulipristal acetate. Thus, it was highly possible that the


11a,17a-isomer I was present in the final product. According to
HPLC-MS, we found two peaks with the same m/z value as Ulipri-
stal acetate. So, it was necessary to confirm the two peaks. At the
beginning, we tried to separate the 11a, 17a-isomer I from the
final product. However, the content of the title compound was
too low to fit the large scale. Then we attempted to directly get
the compound 15b or 16b. Unfortunately, 15a and 15b, or 16a
and 16b had the same Rf according to TLC. There was no way to
obtain 15b or 16b at a slightly large scale by the means of Dancsi’s
route [8].
Previously, we had published our work describing a synthetic
route to Ulipristal acetate [9]. Fortunately, in this route, it was
found the compound 2a and 2b could be separated on TLC easily,
where the Rf value of 2b was slightly larger than 2a. Thus, we
designed the above route to synthesize the 11a,17a-isomer I Fig. 3. ORTEP view of the key intermediate 5.
(Scheme 1 and 2). In this route, the contents of 2b was about
35% using hexachloroacetone as the catalyst, mCPBA as epoxida- concentrated in vacuo to yield a 42:58 mixture of the 2a and 2b.
tion reagents [9]. In order to improve the contents of 2b, the mix- The mixture was separated via column chromatography to give
ture of 2a and 2b was recrystallized firstly. Then, the filtrate was the 5b,10b-isomer 2b.
14 Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16

Fig. 4. (a) The 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS)} of compound 7. (b) The NOEDS {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS)} of compound 7 at 0.89 ppm (arrow).

Fig. 5. (c) The 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS)} of compound 8. (d) The NOEDS {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS)} of compound 8 at 0.90 ppm (arrow).

Fig. 6. (e) The 1H NMR {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS)} of compound 14. (f) The NOEDS {400 MHz, CDCl3 (TMS)} of compound 14 at 0.39 ppm (arrow).

3.2. The formation of the 11a,17b-isomer II and 11b,17b-isomer III methoxide and trimethyl phosphite to get 17a-hydroxy compound
18 (Scheme 7). Our previous work also used compound 1 as the
Dancsi et al. used compound 1 as their starting material to syn- starting material to synthesize Ulipristal acetate [9]. After 5 steps,
thesize Ulipristal acetate [8]. The phenyl-sulfinyl compound 17 the phenyl-sulfinyl compound 20 was afforded, then reacted with
was obtained after two steps, then, reacted with sodium sodium methoxide and trimethyl phosphite to yield 17a-hydroxy
Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16 15

Table 1
The differences in 11a,17a-isomer I, 11a,17b-isomer II and 11b,17b-isomer III and Ulipristal acetate.

Compound [a]20
D (c 1.0,CHCl3) 11-CH (ppm) 17-CH3 (ppm) 17-COCH3 (ppm) 17-OCOCH3 (ppm)
Ulipristal acetate +174° 4.365 0.355 2.137 2.099
11a,17b-Isomer I 82° 3.905 0.797 2.024 2.024
11a,17a-Isomer II 135° 3.850 0.979 1.609 2.072
11b,17a-Isomer III +124° 4.278 0.702 2.129 2.090

Fig. 7. HPLC chromatogram of the crude Ulipristal acetate which was synthesized by Dancsi’s route [8].

Fig. 8. HPLC chromatogram of the crude Ulipristal acetate which was synthesized by Yu’s route [9].

compound 21 (Scheme 8). Thus, most of the product was the 17a- cultivated by slow evaporation at room temperature successfully.
hydroxy compound 18 and 21. However, the 17b-hydroxy com- Its structure had been confirmed by the use of single-crystal
pound 19 and 14 can also be generated according to collision the- X-ray analysis (Fig. 3). It was clear that 4-N,N-dimethylaminophe-
ory. Especially, when there was 11a-[4-(dimetnylamino)phenyl] in nyl in the molecule of compound 5 was found out at the a-config-
the molecule of compound 6, the generation of 17b-hydroxy com- uration which was not changed in the next reactions. The d (ppm)
pound 8 was easier than the 17b-hydroxy compound 19 and 14 of 11b-hydrogen was about 3.6–4.0, while 11a-hydrogen was
(Scheme 9). about 4.2–4.4 according to 1H NMR. Thus, the configurations of
From above discussion, we can see that 11a,17a-isomer I, 4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl in the molecule of compound I, II
11a,17b-isomer II and 11b,17b-isomer III might be all present in and III were easily confirmed.
the final product of Ulipristal acetate. Therefore, further study of In order to confirm the configurations of 17-acetyl in the mole-
the isomers is highly desirable. cule of compound I and II and III, we had tried to make NOEDS
tests of compound I, II and III. Unfortunately, it was found the
3.3. Structure confirmation 17-acetyl and 17-acetoxy affected each other. Then, we transferred
to make NOEDS tests of compound 7 and 8 and 14.
We tried to cultivate the single-crystal to research their struc- According to the 1H NMR and NOEDS of compound 7 and 8 and
ture. Fortunately the single-crystal of the key intermediate 5 was 14 (Figs. 4–6), the configuration of each compound can been easily
16 Y. Zhao et al. / Steroids 95 (2015) 7–16

confirmed. The position of each arrow is just the chemical shift of Acknowledgement
13b-methyl. On the basis of the intensity of the signal of 17-acetyl,
it can be easily confirmed that the 17-acetyl is at the same side of This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foun-
13b-methyl. Clearly, the 17-acetyl of compound 7 is at the b-con- dation of China (No. 81072532 & No. 81102324).
figuration, the 17-acetyl of compound 8 is at the a-configuration,
and the 17-acetyl of compound 14 is at the a-configuration. References
Because the next step is acetylation, the configuration of 17-acetyl
was not changed. Thus, that is to say, the configuration of com- [1] International conference on harmonization (ICH) Guidelines, Q3A (R)
Impurities in New Drug Substances, February 2002 (this guideline provides
pound I, II and III are the title compounds. The differences of these guidance for registration application on the content and qualification of
three isomers are listed in Table 1. impurities in new drug substances produced by the chemical synthesis).
[2] International conference on harmonization (ICH) guidelines, Q3B (R)
Impurities in New Drug Substances February 2002 (Guidance for registration
or marketing application on the content and qualification of impurities in new
4. Results drug product).
[3] Cook CE, Wani MC, Lee YW, et al. 11b-Substituted progesterone analogs: WO,
8912448 [P]; 1989-12-28.
HPLC Analysis was carried out on a Agilent eclipse XDB-C18 [4] Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, Logan SJ, Casale W, Van Horn J, Sogor L, Blithe
(5 lm, 4.6  150 mm) eluded with 70% CH3OH in water at a flow DL, Scherrer B, Mathe H, Jaspart A, Ulmann A, Gainer E. Ulipristal acetate
rate of 1 mL/min and at k = 260 nm. At last, it was found that versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-
inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375(9714):555–62.
0.2% of 11a, 17a-isomer I was present in the Ulipristal acetate syn- [5] Rao PN, Wang Z, Cessac JW, Rosenberg RS, Jenkins DJA, Diamandis EP. New
thesized by Dancsi’s route (Fig. 7), while 0.14% of 11b,17b-isomer 11b-aryl substituted steroids exhibit both progestational and
III was present in the Ulipristal acetate synthesized by our route antiprogestational activity. Steroids 1998;63:523–30.
[6] Kim HK, Rao PN, Burdett JE Jr, Acosta CK. Method for preparing 17a-acetoxy-
(Fig. 8). The 11a,17b-isomer II was not detected in any Ulipristal 11b-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,
acetate synthesized by above two routes. intermediates useful in the method, and methods for the preparation of such
intermediates: WO, 9630390 [P]; 1996-10-03.
[7] Kim HK, Rao PN, Simmons AM. Method for preparing 17a-acetoxy-11b-(4-
N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,
5. Conclusion intermediates thereof, and methods for the preparation of such intermediates:
WO, 2004078709 [P]; 2004-09-16.
[8] Dancsi L, Visky G, Tuba Z, Csörgei J, Molnár C, Magyari E. Industrial process for
We have developed an efficient and practical synthesis approach the synthesis of 17a-acetoxy-11b-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-
to deliver 11a,17a-isomer I, 11a,17b-isomer II and 11b,17b-isomer norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione and new intermediates of the process: WO,
III for the first time. It is essential and important for comprehending 2007144674 [P]; 2007-12-21.
[9] Yongguo Yu, He Yun, Zhao Yi, Hai Li, Yong Wu. A simple and convenient
the complete stereoisomers profile of Ulipristal acetate and meeting synthetic route to Ulipristal acetate. Steroids 2013;78:1293–7.
the stringent regulatory requirements of ICH. This study will provide [10] Palomo C, Oiarbide M, Landa A, et al. Design and synthesis of a novel class of
an access to the reference standard of these three stereoisomers and sugar-peptide hybrids: C-linked glycol b-amino acids through a
stereoselective ‘‘acetate’’ Mannich reaction as the key strategic element. J
also will be of immense help for organic chemists to obtain the pure Am Chem Soc 2002;124:8637–43.
Ulipristal acetate.

You might also like