POM - Case Analysis No. 1

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

I.

TIME CONTEXT

March 1 – 18, 2020 (two and a half weeks)

II. POINT OF VIEW

Mr. Santos

III. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

To look for a site suitable for his business and at the same time place for his new
residence

IV. OBJECTIVES

Musts :
 To find a residential house within two and half weeks’ time.
 To move out from the congested Manila into suburb area.
 The cost of the property is within Php 8, 000,000
 The property is not less than 500 sqm.
 Travel time is within 1 hour.

Wants :
 They wanted elevated place.
 A single storey house and a warehouse type building.
 Find a property in a less populated area.
 A property is not located in “tumbok” lot.

V. AREAS OF CONSIDERATION
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Key Factors Weight Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score

Cost(  .50 4  2.00  3  1.50  4  2.00


must not be
over Php
8M)

2.Size(not  .20  4  0.80  4  0.80  4  0.80


smaller than
500 sqm)
3. Situated  .10  2  0.20  1  0.10  3  0.30
in less
populated
area

4.Distance  .10  4  0.40  4  0.40  4  0.40


between
residence
and
office/school

5. Property  .05  2  0.10  4  0.20  2  0.10


near
commercial
center

6. Located in  .05  4  0.20  1  0.05  1  0.05


an elevated
place
 1.00    3.70    3.05    3.65
Total

1. Budget Constraint – total budget for real property acquisition for residence and
plant site is

2. Location – not located in “tumbok” but in an elevated place.

3. Lot size – not smaller than 500 sqm.

4. Travel Time – not more than one hour away from school and office.
VI. ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTION

Property A

1. Budget constraint – within the allotted budget.

2. Location – not in “tumbok” and slightly more elevated.

3. Location – exactly 500 sqm.

4. Travel time – within the allotted one-hour travel time

Key factors:
1. Property is available immediately.
2. Properly is well maintained and relatively quiet.
3. Resale value of property is very good.

Property B

1. Budget Constraint – higher price as compared to Property A.

2. Location – no data as to elevation of the place but seemed to be in the same level.

3. Lot size – sits on 500 sqm.

4. Travel Time - within the allotted one-hour travel time

Key factors:

1. Property is on mortgage and will be available at least less than two weeks to come up
with a clean title.
2. Property location in terms of nearness to school and office is good and a little less than
30 minutes and 20 minutes’ travel time.
3. Steady appreciation of the asset with available buyers at time of disposal.

Property C

1. Budget Constraint – within the allotted budget.

2. Location – located on top of the hills and is in “tumbok”

3. Lot size – 650 sqm which is beyond the minimum requirement.


4. Travel Time – within the allotted one-hour travel time

Key Factors:

1. Title is clean and transfer can be executed with 2 and a half weeks.
2. Property is called rolling hills subdivision due to its many hills and valleys.
3. No significant increase in land value for the past years but due to SM Group
undertaking, land appreciation is expected in the future.

VII. RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended to purchase Property A as compared to other two properties due to


the following reasons:

1. The three properties acquisition cost are all within the budget but it is only Property
A that offers an assured higher selling price if in case Mr. Santos had a sudden
change of plans in the future.
2. Mrs. Santos is very specific of wanting a property that is elevated and among the
three properties, Property A is slightly more elevated and is not “Tumbok” while the
other two properties are either in “Tumbok” or in the same level of elevation.
3. All properties are within the desired lot size which is 500 sqm and al promised higher
appreciation value but property A is readily available once the sale transaction takes
place.
4. The three properties are all subject for possible poor traffic situation in the future
but currently, Property A is well maintained and relatively quite aside as of the
moment which is best recommended for Santos family who wants to move out from
the congested area of Manila.

VIII. CONCLUSION

When choosing a property, the most important is location, since locating can bring up
value of the home or property, and other thing is that location once decided, a property
cannot be changed. Also, the future lies behind that location is an important
consideration. A good neighborhood can be changed through years, and some
neighborhood has a waiting opportunity that could positively changed after a year.
Always remember that location is the greatest consideration in real estates. Location A
offers an increase in value of property due to its closeness in public amenities and
progressive villages.

IX. PLANS OF ACTION

Functional Objective Strategy Time Frame Budget


Areas
Man To properly utilize Manpower Year Round PhP1M
workforce Planning
Materials To maintain lower Inventory Year Round PhP1M
inventories Management
System
To procure quality
materials, have regular Standardization
supply and handle of Materials
these materials
efficiently
Machine To ensure equipment Advance Year Round PhP300K
are being used Planning and
efficiently with due Scheduling
consideration to System
quality, and safety
among others Regular
Maintenance
and Checking
Method To improve and Sound Method Year Round PhP500K
efficiently work Study
procedures
Method
Implementation
and Monitoring
Money To efficiently meet day Sound Financial Year Round PhP20M
to day and long-term Management
business requirements System
on funds or working
capital
Moment To efficiently meet Time bounded Year Round PhP500K
company goals set Vision, Mission
through the vision and and Goals
mission statements Statement

Gantt Chart and


Scorecards

You might also like