Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Precipitated Ferric Chloride To Improve The Activated Sludge Hindered Settling Velocity: Impact and Modelling
Precipitated Ferric Chloride To Improve The Activated Sludge Hindered Settling Velocity: Impact and Modelling
Precipitated Ferric Chloride To Improve The Activated Sludge Hindered Settling Velocity: Impact and Modelling
*CALAGUA – Unidad Mixta UV-UPV, Institut Universitari d'Investigació d’Enginyeria de l’Aigua i Medi
Ambient – IIAMA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
**Departamento de Matemática Aplicada. Universitat Politècnica de València. Camino de Vera s/n, 46022.
Valencia. Spain.
***Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technologies - Catalysis, Molecular Separations and
Reactor Engineering Group (CREG-I3A) - Universidad Zaragoza, Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
**** Environmental Biotechnology Research Group (INBIAM), Salesian Polytechnic University, Campus el
Vecino, Calle Vieja 12-30 y Elia Liut, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Abstract: This research thoroughly analyses the impact of the precipitated ferric chloride addition on
the activated sludge morphology and settling characteristics. For this purpose, 125 hindered settling
tests were performed with activated sludge samples from an urban wastewater treatment plant at
different precipitated ferric chloride doses. The results have shown that the precipitate addition favours
flocs’ formation, with a linear increase in flocs size and density and also in settling velocity (up to 8x),
and removes phosphorus (soluble and particulate). Standard settling models were fitted and their
usefulness expanded relating their parameters with the reagent concentration through empirical
equations.
Keywords: Activated sludge; Ferric chloride; Floc morphology; Settling velocity; Settling models
Introduction
To avoid the eutrophication risk and meet the increasing effluent wastewater
treatment plant (WWTP) requirements, many WWTPs choose to improve the
suspended solids removal from the final effluent. The more suspended solids are
removed from the WWTP effluent, the lower the particulate phosphorus concentration
is in the effluent. Therefore, he secondary settler in WWTPs plays an important role
in the activated sludge process, removing the sludge flocs. The efficiency of this
solid-liquid separation process clearly impacts in the WWTP effluent quality
(Koivuranta et al., 2015)
Although long-lasting structural options are available for the removal of suspended
solids from the effluent, such as sand filters or membrane processes, they are
expensive and cannot be started-up immediately. An alternative practical approach for
short periods (e.g., disturbances or emergencies) would be to improve the activated
sludge settling characteristics. The addition of inert compounds (e.g., micro-sand,
kaolin,…) has been investigated for almost two decades, showing great potential to
improve the activated sludge settling properties (Wells et al., 2015).
Secondary settling tank widely used mathematical models, like the Vesilind’s
exponential model or the Richardson and Zaki model, are based on the knowledge of
how the activated sludge settling velocity varies with the suspended solids
concentration. Usually, for this purpose, empirical equations are employed in
available commercial tools. However, these empirical equations do not take into
account the effect of chemical precipitation on the settling properties of the activated
sludge. Considering that plant-wide modelling, in which all the involved processes
(physical, chemical and biological) interact, is becoming the standard practice for
WWTP design and optimization, the effect of chemical precipitation on the settling
properties should not be neglected.
Watermatex 2019
In this work, precipitated ferric chloride was used to improve the
activated sludge settling characteristics and to remove phosphorus via absorption. A
precipitated reagent neutralized at pH 7 was selected to avoid affecting the pH of the
biological process when implementing the process in the WWTP. Ferric chloride was
selected since it is widely used for different purposes in WWTPs (De Gregorio et al.,
2010). Different researches (Wilén et al., 2008; Koivuranta et al., 2014) have shown
that the morphological properties of the activated sludge flocs influence the settling
properties. For this reason, a Matlab program for recognizing the flocs and performing
their morphological characterization based on digital image analysis and statistical
processing was developed. Later, multivariate projection methods were used to
simultaneously study the relationships of all the measured variables (size, fractal
dimensions, morphological parameters…) with the hindered settling velocity.
Image analysis techniques were used to determine the distribution of the activated
sludge floc size, fractal dimensions and morphological parameters, calculated as
defined in Costa et al. (2013). The pycnometer method was used to determine the
density of the dry sludge (ρs) while the floc density (ρf) was determined with a
method based on centrifugation in homogenous density solutions.
Closed symbols:
6.0
previously 60.0
Vs / Vso
5.0 neutralized and
4.0 prepitated FeCl3 40.0
3.0 dosing Premoval=a*Fe/(b+Fe)
2.0 20.0 a=126.8081 ; b=212.3783
1.0 R2=0.9757
0.0
0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Fe (mg Fe l‐1)
Fe (mg Fe l‐1)
(a) (b)
Figure 1. Effect of ferric chloride addition on: (a) the hindered settling velocity (being Vso the settling
velocity when no ferric chloride was added) (b) the phosphorus removal (the fitting to the experimental
data is also included, dashed line). Each activated sludge sample is represented with a different symbol.
To gain deeper insight within the ‘practical use’ of the precipitate concentration
range, new settling tests were performed in a limited range (0 – 500 mg Fe l-1). The
non-Volatile Suspended Solids (nVSS) linearly increased with the iron concentration
as expected since the precipitate is formed by iron hydroxides. Thus, the increment of
nVSS reflects the addition of the precipitated.
Figure 2 shows the effect of the precipitated ferric chloride addition on the density
of both, flocs and dry sludge, and on the floc size. As shown in this figure, the floc
size and both densities varied linearly with the added precipitate. In this figure it can
also be observed that the size of the flocs follows a lognormal distribution (Figure
2d), and the same distribution was observed irrespective of the precipitate reagent
dosed.
Watermatex 2019
1.050 1.800
1.048
1.750
1.046
1.044 1.700
f [g ml‐1]
s [g ml‐1]
1.042 1.650
1.040 1.600
1.038
1.550
1.036 y = 0.01897x + 1.03488 y = 0.44976x + 1.52398
R² = 0.9638 1.500 R² = 0.9727
1.034
1.032 1.450
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
_nVSS [g l‐1] _nVSS [g l‐1]
(a) (b)
75
70
65
Deq [µm]
60
55
50
45 y = 30.529x + 46.705
40 R² = 0.7293
35
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
nVSS [g l‐1] Deq (m)
(c) (d)
Figure 2. Effect of neutralized and precipitated ferric chloride on: (a) the flocs density (a) the dry
sludge density and (c) the average floc equivalent diameter. The added precipitate is expressed as the
increment of non-Volatile Suspended Solids. A different symbol is used for each activated sludge
sample. (d) Floc size distribution together with the log-normal distribution fitted (red line) in a test
without precipitate addition.
Figure 3a shows that the activated sludge hindered settling velocity increases
linearly with the precipitated ferric chloride addition, but the increment is different
depending of the initial suspended solids concentration (SSo) of the sample. Figure 3b
evidences that the improvement in the settling velocity (slope of the linear fit)
decreased with the SSo sample (as the amount of iron available per unit of suspended
solid decreased). The fitted equation allows determining the hindered settling velocity
for different doses of precipitated ferric chloride added as Vs=Vs(SSo)+0.0721exp(-
1.15 SSo)ꞏFe. Note that the precipitate concentration in a steady-state activated sludge
process, can be calculated as Fe = Fe dose ꞏ SRT / HRT, where SRT is the solids
retention time and HRT the hydraulic retention time. The fitted equation can be
directly used in state point analysis to evaluate and estimate the secondary clarifier
performance when precipitated ferric chloride is added.
5.0 0.012
SSo (g l‐1)
Vs(Fe) slope (cm l mg Fe‐1 min‐1)
S16; 4.888 Vs(Fe) slope = 0.0721e‐1.15 SSo
4.0 0.01 R² = 0.952
S17; 2.660
Vs ‐ Vso (cm min‐1)
S18; 3.256 0.008
3.0 S19; 5.180
S20; 3.840 0.006
2.0 S21; 2.284
S22; 1.772 0.004
1.0
0.002
0.0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.
Fe (mg Fe l‐1) SSo (g l‐1)
(a) (b)
Figure 3. (a) Effect of precipitated ferric chloride addition on the activated sludge hindered settling
velocity (b) Relationship between suspended solid concentration and the slope of each linear fit.
These results evidence that the addition of neutralized and precipitated FeCl3 is a
feasible and interesting option to improve the performance and removal of suspended
solids from the secondary settler thanks to the improvement in the hindered settling
velocity. This low-cost option for short periods (like disturbances or emergency
situations) can help the WWTP to meet the effluent discharge legal requirements. Not
only phosphorus contained in the suspended solids would be removed but also part of
the soluble phosphorus through absorption (as it has been shown in Figure 1b).
Vesilind’s model
Vs (cm min‐1)
0.6
0.2
0.4 nVSS s Vs
f d 0.1
0.2 DfA‐L 0
R
w[2] (38,4%)
Deq
P
rrG
Fv
SS
FF
DnVSS
R
AR
L
rs
rf
Df_A‐L
d
Df_P‐A
nVSS
s
(a) (b)
Figure 5. (a) PLS loading plot (b) PLS regression coefficients plot. Variables: aspect ratio (AR), radius
of gyration (rG), hindered settling velocity (Vs), perimeter (P), Length (L), equivalent diameter (Deq),
dose of ferric chloride precipitate (d), volumetric fraction of the sludge (Fv), fractal dimension that
relates area – perimeter (DfP-A), fractal dimension that relates area – length (DfA-L), roundness (R), total
suspended solids (TSS), non-volatile suspended solids (nVSS), sludge density (s), flocs density (f),
increment of non-Volatile Suspended Solids (_nVSS) with respect to the concentration of nVSS in
the test with no added precipitate (i.e., _nVSS =[nVSS – nVSSi]).
Conclusions
The main conclusions that can be drawn from this study are:
The addition of neutralized and precipitated ferric chloride on the activated
sludge:
Watermatex 2019
o produces a linear increase in the flocs diameter, in the flocs
density, in the dry sludge density as well as in the hindered settling
velocity of the activated sludge.
o contributes to phosphorus removal in both forms, soluble and
particulate, and it does not impact the pH of the biological process.
The empirical equations proposed and fitted to the experimental data allows
relating the parameters of the standard WWTP settling models to the
concentration of the added precipitated reagent. Thus, the capability of these
standard models, like the Vesilind’s exponential model and Richardson and
Zaki model, was expanded to reproduce with reliability the zonal
sedimentation behaviour of the activated sludge when precipitated ferric
chloride is dosed in WWTPs.
Partial least squares regression efficiently related the hindered settling velocity
with the size, fractal dimensions and morphological parameters. The
volumetric fraction of the sludge, the suspended solid concentration and the
fractal dimension that relates area – perimeter were evidenced as the most
related variables.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Spanish State Research Agency (project CTM2017-86751-
C2-2-R-AR) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
APHA (2012). American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water
Environmental Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd
edition, Washington DC, USA.
Asensi E., Alemany E., Seco A., Ferrer J. (2019). Characterization of activated sludge settling
properties with a sludge collapse-acceleration stage. Separation and Purification Technology 209,
32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.006.
Chen G.W., Chang I.L., Hung W.T., Lee D.J. (1996). Regimes for zone settling of waste activated
sludges. Water Research 30 (8), 1844-1850. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00322-3.
Costa J.C., Mesquita D.P., Amaral A.L., Alves M.M., Ferreira E.C. (2013). Quantitative image analysis
for the characterization of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment: a review. Environ
Sci Pollut Res 20, 5887–5912. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1824-5
De Gregorio C., Caravelli A.H., Zaritzky N.E. (2010). Performance and biological indicators of a
laboratory-scale activated sludge reactor with phosphate simultaneous precipitation as affected by
ferric chloride addition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 165 (2), 607-616. doi:
10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.004.
Koivuranta, E., Keskitalo, J., Stoor, T., Hattuniemi, J., Sarén, M., Niinimäki, J. (2014). A comparison
between floc morphology and the effluent clarity at a full-scale activated sludge plant using optical
monitoring. Environmental Technology, 35(13), 1605–1610.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.875065
Koivuranta E., Stoor T., Hattuniemi J., Niinimäki J. (2015) On-line optical monitoring of activated
sludge floc morphology. Journal of Water Process Engineering 5: 28–34.
Wells M., Wareham D. G., Broady P.s (2015). The effect of loess addition on the settling ability of
activated sludge. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 50:7, 728-734.
Wilén, B. M., Lumley, D., Mattsson, A., Mino, T. (2008). Relationship between floc composition and
flocculation and settling properties studied at a full scale activated sludge plant. Water Research,
42(16), 4404–4418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.033