Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Electrical Properties of Materials
Electrical Properties of Materials
Electrical Properties of Materials
If you have traveled internationally, you would have noticed that electrical outlets do not have a standard
universal voltage rating - an outlet in the United States is at 110 V while in India, it is 220 V.
One major reason for this difference is that the United States uses copper for line transmission while India uses
cheaper aluminium. In turn, this is a function of a material property called ‘electrical resistivity’ which is higher for
aluminium than for copper.
In this section, we will explore how different materials react to electrical fields and how these properties are
measured. In particular, we will consider the following questions in some detail.
Most materials do not have electrons in the spaces between atoms. Instead, they have huge interatomic voids that
are emptier than outer space.
The electrons in these materials are tightly bound to their atoms and the furthest of them from the center are
called valence electrons. These electrons are almost single-handedly responsible for all of Chemistry!
If you apply just the right amount of energy, these valence electrons can be made to jump from their atoms and
into the interatomic void. Liberated from the oppressive electromagnetic pull of the nucleus, they happily roam
around the space bumping into atoms and other electrons.
Most materials do not allow their electrons to circulate so freely. The presence of this abundant pool of ‘free’
electrons is unique to metals like copper.
When the wire is connected to a power supply, these electrons move away from the negative terminal and
towards the positive terminal. This flow of electrons is what we commonly refer to as an electric current.
Electric current is the flow of electrons across a material in response to an electric or magnetic field.
Materials like ceramics, plastics, and wood restrict all of their electrons to within the boundary of their atoms.
These materials do not have any ‘free’ electrons and hence do not conduct electricity.
Band Gap
Quantum mechanics teaches us that:
For every material at ambient condition, there is a unique amount of energy required to push a valence electron
towards the freedom of interatomic space. This amount of energy is called the Band Gap of the material.
The bandgap of Diamond, for example, is 5.5 eV. If you apply precisely this amount of energy to a diamond crystal,
a single electron will jump from a single carbon atom into the space between atoms.
Materials such as ceramics have high bandgaps. The Band Gap of silicon dioxide is 9 eV and aluminium nitride is 6
eV. It is relatively hard therefore to create a pool of free electrons in these materials and consequently, they do
not conduct electricity.
Metals like copper have very low band gaps. In fact, they are so low that at room temperature, the energy from
ambient heat is sufficient to enable all the valence electrons to break free and run amok inside the metal.
To get some perspective, a centimeter cube of copper has over 8.5 x 1022 free electrons - that is eight-five
thousand billion billion electrons!
Thus metals are good conductors of electricity while ceramics, rubber, and wood are bad conductors.
A single electron inside copper at room temperature can theoretically move as fast as 1570 km/s - faster than
sound in the air! However, this electron will soon bump into another electron and be kicked in the opposite
direction, so that even with enormous speeds, it covers no distance at all.
So bad is the chaos inside a metal that even with a power supply an electron only manages to cover 23
micrometers in a second - or roughly the diameter of a human hair.
The electron gets thrown off the track so often that the average distance it manages to scrape through is pitiful.
Given this, it might seem like electricity is a very wasteful form of energy transfer - and indeed an argument can
be made for this. The real strength of electron flow is in its sheer numbers - even if every electron takes a snalish
meandering path in a wire, in billions and billions this results in a powerful transmission of energy.
If electrons moved in steady straight lines, then the effective resistance would be zero.
Simply put, the term resistance is a quantitative measure of the total chaos inside a material.
But how do we quantitatively measure the chaos inside a metal wire?
Consider two physically identical wires - one made of copper and another of aluminium. We attach the same 12 V
battery to each of these wires.
We can measure the current in them using an electronic measuring device, called a multimeter.
If the wires have identical diameters and lengths, we should find that the current in the copper wire is higher than
that of aluminium.
For one, copper has far more free electrons than aluminium.
Aluminium is a smaller atom than copper - its electrons feel the strong attraction of the nucleus and fewer of them
escape to be ‘free’. This means in turn, that there are fewer electrons available to transport electric current when
compared to copper.
Thus, for the same voltage, a better conductor will generate a larger current.
This is formally quantified in what is called as Ohms Law. This law states that:
The current through a conductor between two points is directly proportional to the voltage across the two
points.
V=I⋅RV=I⋅R
The quantity R is called the resistance of the conductor. Its unit is Volt/ampere usually denoted by ohm (Ω).
R=ρVIR=ρVI
The inverse of resistance is called conductance denoted by G.
G=1R=IVG=1R=IV
Ohm's law was first described by George Ohm in 1827. Interestingly, it was heavily criticised by most scientists and
academics at the time. However, it came to be widely accepted in a few decades.
Note that it is incorrect to say that the resistance of aluminium is higher than the resistance of copper. This is
because resistance is a function of the physical dimensions of the conductor - such as the length and diameter for a
wire.
Ohm's law is the relationship between current and voltage in ideal resistors.
Ohm's law is the relationship between current and voltage in ideal resistors.
1. The longer the length of the wire, the more the chances are for an electron to collide with anything else
2. A large diameter creates more space for electron flow and could decrease the chance of the said collision
These intuitions are mapped mathematically by relating the Resistance (R) to its length (l) and cross-section area
(A).
R=ρlAR=ρlA
Where rho is a proportionality constant called the resistivity or specific resistivity of a given material. Unlike
resistance - which is a macroscopic property, resistivity is a fundamental material property. The unit of resistivity is
ohm - meter (Ωm).
ρ=RAlρ=RAl
It is quite common to talk about the inverse of resistivity - a quantity that is appropriately called electrical
conductivity or specific conductance denoted by sigma 𝛔. The unit of conductivity is siemens.
σ=1ρ=lRAσ=1ρ=lRA
The resistivity of copper is 1.68 x 10-8 Ωm and that of aluminium is 2.65 x 10-8 Ωm.
As expected, aluminium is more resistive compared to copper, or equivalently, copper is more conductive than
aluminium.
Across nature, electrical properties such as resistance and conductivity range over 23 orders of magnitude; i.e. if
the smallest value of resistance of any material on earth was 1, the highest value would be 1023 (ten followed by 23
zeros) times that! No other physical or chemical property shows this kind of variation.
Silver is the best conductor among metals - however, we do not use it for electrical wires because of its prohibitive
price. The following table gives the resistivity values of some common materials. It can be seen that the difference
between a good conductor such as copper and a bad conductor such as glass can be several orders of magnitude.
Silicon 0.1
Glass 1 x 109
Rubber 1 x 1013
Most nations use copper for transmitting current because it is significantly cheaper than silver.
Semiconductors
Materials such as silicon and germanium have resistivity values in between that of metals and non-conductors
like glass.
These materials are appropriately called semiconductors.
What makes these materials interesting is not that they occupy a transitional region from good to bad conductors,
but that their conductivity can be easily manipulated.
By adding a pinch of phosphorus or boron, the conductivity of silicon can be made to go up significantly. Further,
each of these 'dopants' leads to two different types of conductivity giving rise to n-type and p-type silicon.
The electric current in the n and p type is caused by free electrons and positively charged holes, respectively. They
behave identically in all other respects.
Individually and in combination, these materials give rise to all the electronic devices and chips that we know of
today.
A semiconductor-based electronic device held by a scientist.
This maximum voltage that an insulator can withstand is called the breakdown voltage of the material.
The breakdown voltage is also known as dielectric strength if the insulator is a dielectric (solid insulators are called
dielectrics). A common application of dielectrics is in an electronic circuit - as resistors, capacitors, inductors etc.
The small dimensions of these components mean that they can reach the dielectric strength even with small
voltages. Hence, the industrial dielectrics used in these applications need very high dielectric strengths.
Metals theoretically do not have a breakdown voltage - however, at higher voltages, large current flows can lead
to joule heating and subsequent melting of the conductor.
Fun Facts
• Electricity flows through a 12-gauge copper wire at an approximate speed of 1,008,000,000 km/h.
• There are certain materials that when cooled down to a temperature of about -234ºC would effectively have no
electrical resistance and become a superconductor.
• The selection of silicon as the main semiconducting element for electronic devices over other elements such as
germanium, happened serendiptuously due to the insulating properties of silicon oxide, which could be grown as a
thin film on it. The original credit went to American physicist William Shockley from Bell Labs.