Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rheological Behaviour of Polyoxometalate-Doped Lyotropic REOSAXS REOSALS PDF
Rheological Behaviour of Polyoxometalate-Doped Lyotropic REOSAXS REOSALS PDF
E (2011) 34: 4
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2011-11004-1
THE EUROPEAN
PHYSICAL JOURNAL E
Regular Article
J.P. de Silva1,a , A.S. Poulos1 , B. Pansu1 , P. Davidson1 , B. Kasmi1 , D. Petermann1 , S. Asnacios2 , F. Meneau3 , and
M. Impéror1
1
Laboratoire de Physique des Solides-UMR 8502-Université Paris-Sud, F-91405 Orsay, France
2
Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes-10 rue Alice Domon et Lonie Duquet, 75205 Paris, France
3
SOLEIL Synchrotron-L’Orme des Merisiers Saint-Aubin, BP 48 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Abstract. We study the influence of nanoparticle doping on the lyotropic liquid crystalline phase of the
industrial surfactant Brij30
R (C12 E4 ) and water, doped with spherical polyoxometalate nanoparticles
smaller than the characteristic dimensions of the host lamellar phase. We present viscometry and in situ
rheology coupled with small-angle X-ray scattering data that show that, with increasing doping concentra-
tion, the nanoparticles act to decrease the shear viscosity of the lamellar phase, and that a shear-induced
transition to a multilamellar vesicle “onion” phase is pushed to higher shear rates, and in some cases com-
pletely suppressed. X-ray data reveal that the nanoparticles remain encapsulated within the membranes
of the vesicles, thus indicating a viable method for the fabrication of nanoparticle incorporating organic
vesicles.
2.5 RheoSAXS
It is now pertinent to examine the shear rate dependence a lamellar phase that has undergone a lamellar-MLV tran-
of the viscosity for these doped phases. The shear thinning sition when subjected to an ascending and descending se-
behaviour of both a lamellar and MLV phase can be mod- ries of constant shear rate steps is observed, cf. Oliviero et
elled using the Sisko equation [32]: η(γ̇) = η∞ + K γ̇ −n , al. [11], for example. This figure also illustrates that data
where η∞ is the infinite shear viscosity, K the consistency derived from a polycarbonate concentric cylinder shear
and n the power law fit parameter. We present in fig. 4 cell (cyl) and metal cone-plate geometries (c-p) are in good
shear viscosity against shear rate data for various POM agreement. The data in fig. 4 and 5 are obtained by multi-
doping concentrations for the lamellar phase, i.e. strictly ple experiments; again with imposed shear rate steps over
prior to the onset of the lamellar-MLV transition. By con- narrow shear rate ranges. It should be noted that, because
trast, in fig. 5 the equivalent data for the MLV phase is the shear history of the sample is different, in contrast to
presented for the various POM doping concentrations. The the data presented in fig. 2 that are from a single experi-
inset in fig. 5 shows a typical complete rheological curve for ment over a wide shear rate range, the exact point of the
an undoped 40/0 sample, where the classical hysteresis of lamellar-MLV transition may appear to be slightly shifted
Page 6 of 9 The European Physical Journal E
between the two data sets for samples of the same doping
concentration.
Firstly, upon examination of the shear rate dependence
of the viscosity for the lamellar phases, data presented in
fig. 4, it can be seen that the shear thinning behaviour
of the doped and undoped lamellar phases when fitted by
the Sisko equation are all well described by a η ∝ γ̇ −0.5
dependence that is typical of a lamellar phase that flows
by the displacement of defects through the bulk phase [5,
11]. However, it is clear that the viscosity is systematically
decreased by the addition of POMs without affecting this
fundamental behaviour, while the consistency K falls from
around 25 to 3 Pa s−n with 0 to 4% POM doping fraction,
as presented in fig. 4 inset. This behaviour is consistent
with our supposition that the POMs act to fluidify the
lamellar phase via a reduction of defect density.
In fig. 5 we present similar data and analysis for the Fig. 6. Mean critical shear stress against shear rate and fit for
viscosity of the MLV phase for various POM doping con- 40% surfactant samples for a range of doping concentrations.
centrations. Here we see a rather different behaviour from Inset: measured shear stress against shear rate data for a series
of shear rate steps for 40/0 and 40/4 samples.
that of the lamellar phase: all the data fall on the same
curve described by a power law index of n = 1 ± 0.1 from
a fit to the Sisko equation with η∞ ≈ 2 Pa s. This result
there is an invariant (with respect to POM doping concen-
indicates that POM doping has a negligible effect on the
tration) critical stress, σc = 130±20 Pa for 40% surfactant
viscosity of the corresponding MLV phase (note that the
phases, and it is this invariant critical stress that lies at the
viscosity of the MLV phase is typically higher than that of
root of the displacement of the lamellar-MLV transition to
the lamellar phases, K ≈ 200 Pa s−n compared to the 25-
higher shear rates with increased POM doping (see fig. 2):
3 Pa s−n range for the lamellar phases), a rather surprising
the POMs act to systematically reduce the viscosity of the
result considering the profound effect on the viscosity of
lamellar phase but σc remains constant, thus the doped
the lamellar phase seen previously. This η ∝ γ̇ −1 depen-
system must be sheared at a correspondingly higher shear
dence is of a comparable order to that of γ̇ −0.8 observed
rate in order to attain an average stress of σc across the
by Bergenholtz et al. [33] for an AOT/brine system and
sample and induce the lamellar-MLV transition.
γ̇ −0.89 observed by Nettesheim et al. for a Laponite clay
particle doped C12 E4 /water system [26], but greater than
the γ̇ −0.53 dependence observed for a pure C12 E4 /water
system by Müller et al. [10]. The calculation of such expo- 3.5 Microscopic observations
nents depends on the range of shear rates studied and the
uniformity of the sample at high shear rates, where voids SAXS experiments can be employed to shift the focus of
and solvent lubrication layers forming on the cell walls can the study towards the nanoscopic scale structure corre-
result in a measured viscosity lower than the true viscos- sponding to the various observed bulk states and transi-
ity. Here we may also see an effect of the small amounts tions. Presented in fig. 7 are rheological, SAXS and optical
of Brij30
R impurities versus pure C12 E4 , as the undoped data for a 50% surfactant system at two different doping
phase is also affected by the same discrepancy. concentrations for a range of sequentially increasing shear
rate steps, obtained through a combination of RheoSAXS
and rheo-optical experiments. In fig. 7 we present data for
3.4 Critical shear stress for MLV formation 50/2 and 50/4 samples sheared at 1, 4, 8, 10, and 15 s−1
for 10 minutes per step in the Couette cylinder geome-
Presented in fig. 6 is the mean shear stress, σm , against try of the RheoSAXS instruments. For the 50/4 sample
the shear rate during which the lamellar-MLV transition comparative data from glass cone-plate geometry is pre-
occurs for a range of POM doping concentrations. σm sented in order to give an indication of the consistency
is the average stress recorded during the lamellar-MLV between data from the two different measurement sys-
transition over the total time of the imposed shear rate tems [35]. Also presented are optical micrographs between
step, where the error bar gives an indication of the to- cross-polarisers of the sample texture and corresponding
tal stress range during the shear step. Typical measured X-ray scattering patterns at selected shear rates, in this
shear stress against shear rate data are shown in the in- case at the tangential position for the 50/2 sample and
set of fig. 6, where the curves for 40/0 and 40/4 samples the radial position for the 50/4 sample.
exhibit a similar form that is offset in shear rate by an The most striking feature of this data is that the 50/2
order of magnitude. The form of these data is consistent samples undergo a lamellar-MLV transition at approxi-
between doped and undoped samples and similar to pre- mately 8 s−1 while the 50/4 sample continues to exhibit
vious studies such as those of cationic lamellar phases for the shear thinning behaviour of a lamellar phase up to
example [34]. A zero-order fit to the data indicates that shear rates of 15 s−1 . If one estimates the critical stress
J.P. de Silva et al.: Rheological behaviour of polyoxometalate-doped lyotropic lamellar phases Page 7 of 9
Fig. 8. Radially averaged SAXS data for 40/0 and 40/2 sam-
ples at shear rates pre- and post-transformation from a lamellar
to MLV phase (radial cell position).
Fig. 7. Measured shear viscosity against time for 50/2 and Up to a shear rate of 15 s−1 the 50/4 sample contin-
50/4 samples at shear rates of 1, 4, 8, 10 and 15 s−1 at 10 min- ues to shear align, showing fine graining of the defects
utes per shear step (15 min pre-shear data not shown). Cor- in the lamellar phase into streaks parallel to the flow di-
responding cross-polarised optical textures and comparative rection, similar in structure to that observed in shear-
rheological data derived from glass cone-plate geometries un- aligned C12 E5 /water lamellar phases [36] or AOT/brine
der identical shear conditions. (Scale bar is 100 microns, arrow and SDS/oil/water lamellar phases [37]. This is also con-
indicates direction of shear.) Corresponding SAXS spectra are firmed by SAXS data that shows an anisotropic enhance-
acquired at the indicated cell position. ment attributed to the scattering by the lamellae inside
defects oriented under the flow. This enhancement must
be attributed to the alignment of defects, as in the radial
for the 50% surfactant systems to be about 160–200 Pa, cell position the lamellae oriented by the flow (with their
then at a shear rate of 20 s−1 only approximately 20 Pa normal along the X-ray beam) do not contribute to the
of stress is generated across the sample; thus a vastly in- scattering.
creased shear rate, probably well above that practically
possible before the sample is ejected from the shear cell,
would be required to reach the transition threshold. Such 3.6 Vesicle formation in doped phases
suppression of MLV formation is similar to that observed
by Berghausen et al. upon the addition of 0.5% poly(N- One can more closely study the kinetics of the lamellar-
isopropyl acrylamide) (PNIPAm) to an SDS/water lamel- MLV structural transformation using in situ rheoSAXS
lar phase [15]. data. Radially averaged SAXS data for 40/0 and 40/2
Optical micrographs for the 50/4 sample at 1 s−1 are samples at shear rates of 1 and 10 s−1 are presented in
representative of a disoriented lamellar phase, and the cor- fig. 8, where the data are representative of the lamellar
responding SAXS spectra exhibit typical isotropic, narrow phase and MLV phases respectively; the peaks correspond
Bragg rings corresponding to the interlamellar repeat dis- to the first and second Bragg orders and the strong scat-
tance and indicating no preferential alignment in the sam- tering profile from the POM particles is once again visible
ple; here the first two Bragg orders are clearly visible by in the 40/2 sample data. Future detailed line shape anal-
eye. The broad “halo” signal towards the extremities of the ysis of such data should provide some insight into the ef-
pattern is due to strong scattering from the POM parti- fect of adsorbed POMs on the bilayer bending moduli [38,
cles. As the shear rate increases to 10 s−1 the 50/2 sample 39]; here we focus only on the Bragg peaks in the region
has already formed an MLV phase, where a characteris- 0.06 < q < 0.2 Å−1 because the polycarbonate cell scat-
tic uniform texture is seen in the optical micrograph and ters significantly at small q. The characteristic features of
the corresponding SAXS pattern remains isotropic in both X-ray data from doped and undoped phases have been
tangential (pictured) and radial cell positions, as the MLV previously described in detail [8], where one finds that
phase is isotropic. It is interesting to note that the Bragg the lamellar period is invariant with POM doping and
rings observed for the 50/2 sample MLV phase are slightly the POMs preferentially adsorb onto the surface of the
broadened and displaced from those of the corresponding surfactant bilayers, as indicated by the change in relative
lamellar phase prior to any lamellar-MLV transition, and intensities of the first- and second-order Bragg peaks with
the origin of this effect will be discussed in detail below. POM doping.
Page 8 of 9 The European Physical Journal E
FAST for the use of a glass rheometer measurement system seen in the C12 E4 phase diagram [20] and confirmed by ob-
and SOLEIL for beamtime allocation. We thank the referees servations of cross-polarised optical texture after a quench
for pertinent comments that improved the manuscript. to 0 ◦ C.
23. B. Medronho, M. Miguel, U. Olsson, Langmuir 23, 5270
(2007).
References 24. F. Nettesheim, J. Zipfel, P. Lindner, W. Richtering, Col-
loids Surf. A 183-185, 563 (2001).
25. O. Diat, D. Roux, F. Nallet, Phys. Rev. E 51, 3296 (1995).
1. R.G. Larson, The Structure and Rheology of Complex Flu-
26. F. Nettesheim, J. Zipfel, U. Olsson, F. Renth, P. Lindner,
ids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999) pp. 3-4.
W. Richtering, Langmuir 19, 3603 (2003).
2. O. Diat, D. Roux, J. Phys. II 3, 9 (1993).
27. A.S. Poulos, PhD thesis (2009).
3. O. Diat, D. Roux, F. Nallet, J. Phys. II 3, 1427 (1993).
28. S. Paasch, F. Schambil, M.J. Schwuger, Langmuir 5, 1344
4. D. Roux, F. Nallet, O. Diat, Europhys. Lett. 1, 53 (1993).
(1989).
5. C. Meyer, S. Asnacios, M. Kléman, Eur. Phys. J. E 6, 245
29. J. Munoz, C. Gallegos, V. Flores, J. Disp. Sci. Technol. 7,
(2001).
453 (1986).
6. P. Oswald, M. Kléman, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett. 12, L411
30. P. Panizza, D. Roux, V. Vuillaume, C.-Y.D. Lu, M.E.
(1982).
Cates, Langmuir 12, 248 (1996).
7. J.F. Keggin, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 144, 75 (1934).
31. R.G. Horn, M. Kleman, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 3, 229 (1978).
8. A.S. Poulos, D. Constantin, P. Davidson, M. Impéror, B.
32. P. Versluis, J.C. van de Pas, J. Mellema, Langmuir 13,
Pansu, P. Panine, L. Nicole, C. Sanchez, Langmuir 24,
5732 (1997).
6285 (2008).
33. J. Bergenholtz, N.J. Wagner, Langmuir 12, 3122 (1996).
9. A.S. Poulos, D. Constantin, P. Davidson, M. Impéror, P.
34. P. Partal, A.J. Kowalski, D. Machin, N. Kiratzis, M.G.
Judeinstein, B. Pansu, J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 220 (2010).
Berni, C.J. Lawrence, Langmuir 17, 1331 (2001).
10. S. Müller, C. Börschig, W. Gronski, C. Schmidt, D. Roux,
35. Shear viscosities measured here for the pure undoped
Langmuir 15, 7558 (1999).
lamellar phase at 40% surfactant concentration are around
11. C. Oliviero, L. Coppola, R. Gianferri, I. Nicotera, U. Ols-
an order of magnitude higher than those given by Müller
son, Colloids Surf. A 228, 85 (2003).
et al. for a pure 40% C12 E4 lamellar phase at equivalent
12. Y. Kosaka, M. Ito, Y. Kawabata, T. Kato, Langmuir 26,
shear rates [10]. We can identify two reasons for this: previ-
3835 (2010).
ous experiments demonstrate that there is a clear effect of
13. H.E. Warriner, S.H. Idziak, N.L. Slack, P. Davidson, C.R.
the nature of the cell material and surface roughness [43];
Safinya, Science 271, 969 (1996).
the second is the possible influence of impurities, however
14. S.L. Keller, H.E. Warriner, C.R. Safinya, J.A. Zasadzinski,
this is less likely to explain the observed discrepancy. Our
Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4781 (1997).
measurements indicate that this discrepancy is due to the
15. J. Berghausen, J. Zipfel, P. Lindner, W. Richtering, J.
use of smooth glass shear cells rather than metal or poly-
Phys. Chem. B 105, 11081 (2001).
carbonate; a 40% Brij30 R sample sheared with a smooth
16. V. Ponsinet, P. Fabre, J. Phys. II 6, 955 (1996).
glass geometry very closely reproduces the viscosities mea-
17. J. Arrault, C. Grand, W.C.K. Poon, M.E. Cates, Euro-
sured by Müller et al.
phys. Lett. 38, 625 (1997).
36. C.-Y.D. Lu, P. Chen, Y. Ishii, S. Komura, T. Kato, Eur.
18. Y. Suganuma, M. Imai, K. Nakaya, J. Appl. Crystallogr.
Phys. J. E 25, 91 (2008).
40, s303 (2007).
37. L. Courbin, P. Panizza, Phys. Rev. E 69, 021504 (2004).
19. F. Nettesheim, I. Grillo, P. Lindner, W. Richtering, Lang-
38. J.T. Brooks, C.M. Marques, M.E. Cates, J. Phys. II 1, 673
muir 20, 3947 (2004).
(1991).
20. D.J. Mitchell, G.J.T. Tiddy, L. Waring, T. Bostock, M.P.
39. M.-F. Ficheux, A.-M. Bellocq, F. Nallet, Eur. Phys. J. E
McDonald, Faraday Trans. I 79, 975 (1983).
4, 315 (2001).
21. J.P. de Silva, D. Petermann, B. Kasmi, M. Imperor, P.
40. A. Lutti, P.T. Callaghan, Eur. Phys. J. E 24, 129 (2007).
Davidson, B. Pansu, F. Meneau, J. Perez, E. Paineau, I.
41. A. Leon, D. Bonn, J. Meunier, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
Bihannic, L. Michot, C. Baravian, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 247,
14, 4785 (2002).
012052 (2010).
42. T. Gulik-Krzywicki, J.C. Dedieu, D. Roux, C. Degert, R.
22. We use a pre-shear treatment rather than a quench
Laversanne, Langmuir 12, 4668 (1996).
into the low-temperature isotropic region of the phase
43. N. Jager-Lézer, J.F. Tranchant, V. Alard, J. Doucet, J.L.
diagram [10], as at 50% surfactant concentration there is
Groissiord, J. Rheol. 42, 417 (1998).
no low-temperature lamellar-isotropic phase transition, as