= PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS Coverage — 2" Exam August 31, 2019 ARTICLES 1-88 ~MARRIAGE DEFINED Relevant constitutional provisions (1987 Constitution) 1, Section 12, Article II 2. Seetion 1, Article XV, and 3. Section 2, Article XV 2-3 ESSENTIAL/FORMAL REQUISITES 1. REPUBLIC v. CA 236 $257 2. SY v, CA 330 8 550 3. SEVILLA v. CARDENAS 497 $ 428 4. SILVERIO v. REPUBLIC 537 S 373 4- EFFECT RE. ABSENCE, DEFEC ‘COSCA v. PALAYPAYON 237 § 249 ARANES v. OCCIANO 380 8 402 MORIGO v. PEOPLE 422 8 376 ALCANTARA v. ALCANTARA 531 8 466 NOLLORA, JR. v. PEOPLE GR# 191425 09/07/16 |. REPUBLIC v. ALBIOS GR# 198780 10/16/12 ABBAS v. ABBAS GR# 183896 01/30/13 . GO-BANGAYAN v. BANGAYAN 700 S 702 . KHO v. REPUBLIC and KHO GR#187462 06/01/16 5- AGES OF THE PARTIES 6 - PRESCRIBED FORM OR RITE 7 and 10- SOLEMNIZING OFFICERS 1. ARANES v. OCCIANO 380 8 402 2. JERRYSUS TILAR v. ELIZABETH TILAR 831 S 116 20- PERIOD of VALIDITY of MARRIAGE LICENS! 21 — ONE OR BOTH PARTIES IS/ARE FOREIGNER/S RECIO v. RECIO 366 8 437 26 @)- MARRIAGES BETWEEN A FILIPINO AND A FOREIGNER REPUBLIC v. IYOY 470 S 508 2. REPUBLIC v, ORBECIDO 111472 § 114 3. CORPUZ v. SANTO TOMAS GR# 186571 08/11/2010 4. FUJIKI v. MARINAY GR# 196049 06/26/13 5. KOIKE v. KOIKE GR#215723 07/27/16 6. REPUBLIC v. MARELYN TANEDO MANALO GR#221029 GULARITY THEREOF oenayeenr® 04/24/18 7. REPUBLIC v. FLORIE GRACE COTE GR# 212860, MARCH 14, 2018 8. DE LA CRUZ-MORISONO v. RYOJ MORISONO GR# 226013, JULY 2, 2018 9. STEPHEN JUEGO-SAKAI v. REPUBLIC GR# 224015, JULY 23, 2018 34 — MARRIAGES EXEMPT FROM MARRIAGE LICENSE REQUIREMENT/EFFECT ON FALSITY OF AFFIDAVIT OF COHABITATION REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 34, FAMILY CODE. 1, NINAL v. BADAYOG 328 S 122 2. MANZANO v. SANCHEZ 354 $1 3. DE CASTRO v. DE CASTRO 545 S 162 4. DAYOT v. DAYOT 550 $ 435 5. CARLOS v. SANDOVAL 574 S116 6. SANTIAGO v. PEOPLE 763 S 54 35 -38 VOID MARRIAGES SANTOS v. CA 01/04/1995 240 S 20 CHING MING TSOI v. CA 01/16/1997 266 S 324 REPUBLIC v. CA and MOLINA 02/13/1997 268 S198 MARCOS v. MARCOS 343 S 755 DEDEL v. CA 421 $461 — Antisocial personality disorder TENEBRO v. CA 423 $272 JARILLO v. PEOPLE 601 S236 REPUBLIC v. HAMANO 05/20/2004 428 $ 735 ANTONIO v. REYES 03/10/2006 484 $ 353 10. NAJERA v. NAJERA 591 $ 542 11. FERRARIS v, FERRARIS 495 § 542 12, PARAS v. PARAS 529 S 81 eeIaVeeye13. HALILI v. HALILI S51 S576 14. HALILI v. HALILI (Recon) 589 S 25 15. NGO-TE v. TE 02/13/09 579 § 193 16. TING v. VELEZ-TING 582 § 694 17. AZCUETA v. REPUBLIC 05/26/09 588 S 196 18. KALAW v. FERNANDEZ GR#166357 01/14/15 (Recon) 19. REPUBLIC v. ROMERO Il 785 $164 20. MATUDAN v. REPUBLIC 808 $ 480 21. CASTILLO v. REPUBLIC and IMPAS GR#214064 02/06/17 22. DEL ROSARIO v. DEL ROSARIO GR#222541 02/15/17 23. DE LA FUENTE v. DE LA FUENTE GR#188400 03/08/17 24. BAKUNAWA III v. BAKUNAWA GR#217993 08/09/17 25. SINGSON v. BENJAMIN SINGSON GR# 210766 01/08/18 26. REPUBLIC v. TIONGLICO GR#218630 01/11/18 27. DAN v. MARCO DAN GR# 209031 04/16/18 28. REPUBLIC v. JAVIER GR# 210518 4/18/18 29. REPUBLIC v. LIBERATO MOLA CRUZ GR#236629, July 23, 2018 40 — NEED FOR DECLARATION OF NULLITY OF A PREVIOUS VOID MARRIAGE FOR PURPOSES OF REMARRIAGE 1. DOMINGO v. CA 226 8 572 2. ATIENZA v. BRILLANTES, JR. 243 S 32 3._CASTILLO v. CASTILLO GR# 189607, APRIL 18, 2016 41 — NECESSITY RE. OBTAINING DECREE OF PRESUMPTIVE DEATH = _Requsites REPUBLIC v. NOLASCO 220 S 20 CALISTERIO v. CALISTERIO 04/16/00 330 $ 201 MANUEL v. PEOPLE 11/29/05 476 S 461 REPUBLIC v. CA and ALEGRO 12/09/05 477 S 377 SSS v. VDA. DE BAILON 03/24/06 485 S 376 VALDEZ v. REPUBLIC GR# 180863 09/08/09 SANTOS v. SANTOS GR# 187061 10/08/14 REPUBLIC v. EDNA ORCELINO VILLANUEVA GR# 210929, 07/29/2015 . REPUBLIC v. JOSE SARENOGAN, JR. GR# 199194 02/10/2016 10. REPUBLIC v. TAMPUS GR#214243 03/16/16 11, REPUBLIC v. CATUBAG GR#210580 04/18/18 12. MATIAS v. REPUBLIC GR#230751, APRIL 25, 2018 42 — REQUIREMENT IF ABSENTEE SPOUSE RE-APPEARS Cf. Santos v. Santos GR# 187061, October 08, 2014 43 - EFFECTS RE: TERMINATION OF SUBSEQUENT MARRIAGE, 44 — EFFECTS RE. PARTIES TO SUBSEQUENT MARRIAGE ARE IN BAD FAITH 45 - 47 VOIDABLE MARRIAGES/GROUNDS/PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD 1. VILLANUEVA v. CA 505 S 565 2._ALMELOR v. RTC OF LAS PINAS CITY 563 S 447 48 — APPEARANCE of PROSECUTING ATTORNEY — necessity 1, ANCHETA v. ANCHETA 424 § 725 50-51 EFFECTS IF MARRIGE IS ANNULLED UNDER ARTICLE 45 OR IS VOID UNDER ARTICLE 40 ~What constitutes the “children’s presumptive legitimes” NOVERAS v. NOVERAS GR#188289, August 20, 2014 55 - 67 LEGAL SEPARATION/ GROUNDS/DENIAL/EFFECTS, 1. SIOCHI v. GOZON 616 S 87 2. QUIAO v. QUIAO 675 $ 642 68-73 RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE ILUSORIO v. BILDNER 332 $ 169 eo eravaene74-81. PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE/REQUISITES/PRESUMPTION 82 86 DONATIONS BY REASON OF MARRIAGE/REQUISITES/FORMS/PROHIBITION/ GROUNDS FOR REVOCATION 87 DONATION BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE DURING MARRIAGE/PROHIBITION/INCLUSION OF COMMON = LAW RELATIONSHIP ARCABA v. TABANCURA 370 S 414