Opinion Essay Natalia Quiñonez Agurto

Animal and Human Cloning

As far as I am concerned about the topic at hand I completely

disagree since it is not unethical to interfere with nature
covering both human genetics and animal which is not allowing
the natural course of life and identity but which mainly affects
the authenticity of the person or animal so that it will detail
the following and certain arguments.

My main reason for being against cloning is ethical part, since

this action is stealing the right of a person, which is the best
genes are selected while not serve are stripped or just let them
die, which undermines the ethical and moral values of the
individual.

The next reason is genetic, so it is altering the components of

a living being and manipulate it to an end, in this case another
might not be authentic but a replica consequence of that is
clearly supplanting the nature of things.

As my last reason is religion, so it is impossible for any

scientific and experimentation that under no circumstances, can
be justified is found on passing the limit determined by the
respect for life from conception, as it established God.

In general terms and as a conclusion, I can say that cloning is

an act that causes a serious increase in genetic abnormalities
which cause death and thus affect the natural laws of genetics,
but the main consequence decomposition phenomenon is observed of
genetic diversity, which estimates a guarantee and it is this
which ensures evolution as safeguarding the conservation of
living species.