MOTILAL NEHRU NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

CE-1802 WATER RESOURCES ENGINEE

TUTORIAL SHEET- 5
GROUP: CE-2

B. EMBANKMENT DAMS

3. An earth dam made of a homogeneous material has the following data

Cofficient of permeability of dam material 5 (10^-6)cumecs
Level of top of dam 200 m
Level of deepest river bed 178 m
H.F.L of reservoir 197.5 m
Width of top of dam 4.5 m
U/S Slope (H:V) 3
D/S Slope (H:V) 2
Solution:
H 19.5 m
U/S Distance 66 m
D/S Distance 44 m
Total Base 114.5 m
B 58.5 m
B' 56 m

Taking focus F at d/s toe of dam equation of base parabola

AB= 0.3*B
AB= 17.5 m

b= 73.5 m

S=
S= 2.54 m
Vertex C of base of parabola shall be situated at distance (S/2) from F beyond the d/s toe of dam

x y^2=2*x*S + S^2
Column1 Column2 Column3 Column4 Column5
0 6.4516 6.45 2.53968502 2.54
10 57.2516 57.25 7.566372975 7.57
20 108.0516 108.05 10.39471019 10.39
30 158.8516 158.85 12.60357092 12.6
40 209.6516 209.65 14.47929556 14.48
50 260.4516 260.45 16.13846337 16.14
60 311.2516 311.25 17.64227876 17.64
 70 362.0516 362.05 19.02761152 19.03
73.5 379.8316 379.83 19.48922779 19.49

At exit point the pheratic line intersect the downstream face at

α= 0.463647609 radian
α= 26.5650511771 degree
a= 17.679401481 m
a= 17.68 m

Discharge through the dam section Q= K*S

Q= 1.27E-05 cumecs/m length of dam

Water Table Pheratic Line Dam Schema

x y x y x
-56.5 19.5 1.27 0 0
-114.5 19.5 0 2.54 -44
-10 7.57 -48.5
-20 10.39 -114.5
-30 12.6
-40 14.48
-50 16.14 Corrected Pheratic Line
-60 17.64 -15.8
-70 19.03 -30
-73.5 19.49 -40
-48.5
-56

(ii)
Now Since horizontal filter is also provided
Left end of filter will act as focus and is designated origin
Length of filter= 25 m
x= 48.5 m

Taking focus F at left end of filter

S=
S= 3.773320155 m
S= 3.77 m

Vertex C of base of parabola shall be situated at distance (S/2) from F beyond the left end of filter

x y^2=2*x*S + S^2
Column1 Column2 Column3 Column4 Column5
0 14.2129 14.21 3.769615365 3.77
10 89.6129 89.61 9.46625586 9.47
15 127.3129 127.31 11.28317331 11.28
 19 157.4729 157.47 12.54870511 12.55
23.5 191.4029 191.4 13.83473888 13.83
25 202.7129 202.71 14.23762621 14.24
31 247.9529 247.95 15.74642817 15.75
40 315.8129 315.81 17.77104386 17.77
48.5 379.9029 379.9 19.49102357 19.49

Dam Schema Pheratic Line Filter

x y x y x
0 0 -23.115 0 0
-44 22 -25 3.77 -10
-48.5 22 -35 9.47 -25
-114.5 0 -40 11.28
-44 12.55 Corrected Pheratic Line
Water Table -48.5 13.83 x
-56.5 19.5 -56 15.75 -44
-114.5 19.5 -65 17.77 -48.5
-73.5 19.49 -56
STITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ALLAHABAD, PRAYAGRAJ
TER RESOURCES ENGINEERING II
TUTORIAL SHEET- 5
GROUP: CE-2
 EMBANKMENT DAMS
(i)
25

20
Dam Schema
Pheratic Line
15
Water Table
Corrected Phera
10
Dam Schema
y 5
0
22
0
22
-140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20
0

Corrected Pheratic Line

7.9
12.6
14.48
16.4
19.5

EMBANKMENT DAMS
(ii)
400

350

300 Dam Schema

Water Table
250
Horizontal Fil
200 Phreatic Line
Corrected Phr
150

100

50

0
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
 200 Phreatic Line
Corrected Phr
150

100

50

0
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Filter
y
0
0
0

Corrected Pheratic Line

y
12.55
13.83
19.5
MS

Dam Schema
Pheratic Line
Water Table
Corrected Pheratic Line

20

MS

Dam Schema
Water Table
Horizontal Filter
Phreatic Line
Corrected Phreatic Line

00 450
 Phreatic Line
Corrected Phreatic Line

00 450
 MOTILAL NEHRU NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY A
CE-1802 WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER
TUTORIAL SHEET- 5
GROUP: CE-2

B. EMBANKMENT DAMS

5. Check the stability of the d/s slope of the earthen-dam section, given in example 20.4 (S.K, Garg Book) on a possible slip circle. Deter
Also determine the net factor of safety that will be available, if by somehow, the soil in the d/s triangular shoulder gets fully submerg

Solution:
Top width 4.5 m
u/s slope 3
d/s slope 2
Level of the top of dam 200 m
Level of river bed 178 m
HFL of reservoir 197.5 m
cohesion of soil of dam 24 kN/m^2
Angle of internal friction of dam soil 25
Dry weight of soil 18 kN/m^3
Submerged weight of soil 12 kN/m^3
Coefficient of permeability of dam soil 5E-06 m/sec

Height of dam 22 m
Base width 114.5 m

Calculation of PQ line
Let the toe of embankment be origin (0,0)
Coordinates of top d/s corner: x coordinate -44 m
y coordinate 22 m
Alpha 1 25 deg
Alpha 2 35 deg
Alpha 26.578525 deg
(Alpha is the angle of d/s surface with the base.)

Coordinates of point P: x coordinate -26.94297 m

y coordinate 33.935589 m

Coordinates of point Q: x coordinate -99 m

y coordinate -22 m

Equation of PQ line: Y = 0.7762683 X + 54.85057

Equation of slip surface:
Taking centre of the slip circle as directly above the toe and lying on the PQ line.
Centre coordinates: x coordinate 0m
y coordinate 54.850565 m
This slip circle passes through the toe and the top d/s corner of dam.

So equation of circle: (x - 0 )^2 + (y- 54.85057 )^2 =

Dividing the soil mass:

Soil mass is divided into slices of width b= 5m
Width of last slice= bn = 4m
No. of slices= n= 9
m= 0.8

Phreatic line falls below the slip surface so the pore pressure is not considered.

Calculation of y ordinates:

i (in yi) x d/s surface y slip surface y End ordinate

1 -5 2.5 0.22836730596 2.27163269404

2 -10 5 0.91927091898 4.08072908102
3 -15 7.5 2.09087885796 5.40912114204
4 -20 10 3.77626145504 6.22373854496
5 -25 12.5 6.02859777554 6.47140222446
6 -30 15 8.93123916613 6.06876083387
7 -35 17.5 12.6180599029 4.88194009711
8 -40 20 17.3194513875 2.41249375129
= 37.82 m

CASE a: The phreatic line falls below the slip surface so the pore pressure is not considered and only dry unit weight is conside

Calculation of normal and tangential components of weight of slices:

Total Normal weight ∑N =

= 3044.45 kN

Total Tangential weig ∑T =

= 1522.23 kN

Angle of slip surface at the centre, θ=

= 53.24 degree
L=
Length of slip surface
= 50.94 m
Calculating Factor of Safety:

FS = 1.74 SAFE

CASE b: The soil in the slices if fully submerged, then N's can be calculated on the basis of submerged weights and T's on the b

Calculation of normal and tangential components of weight of slices:

Total Normal weight ∑N =

= 2029.63 kN

Total Tangential weig ∑T =

= 1844.43 kN

Calculating Factor of Safety:

FS = 1.18 UNSAFE
 STITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ALLAHABAD, PRAYAGRAJ
ATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING II
TUTORIAL SHEET- 5
GROUP: CE-2

ook) on a possible slip circle. Determine the factor of safety available against such a slip.
angular shoulder gets fully submerged.

Input
Output
Verdict

Slope ἀ1 ἀ2
1 27.5 37
2 25 35
3 25 35
4 25 35
5 25 35
 3008.585

d only dry unit weight is considered.

merged weights and T's on the basis of saturated weights.
 MOTILAL NEHRU NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ALLAHA
CE-1802 WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING II
TUTORIAL SHEET- 5
GROUP: CE-2

D. CANAL REGULATORS

6 Design a cross regulator and a head regulator for a channel which takes off from the parent channel with the follo
Discharge of parent channel = 140 cumecs
Discharge of distributary = 15 cumecs
FSL of the parent channel, u/s= 210 m
FSL of the parent channel, d/s= 209.8 m
Bed width of parent channel, u/s= 52 m
Bed width of parent channel, d/s= 46 m
Depth of water in the parent channel= 2.5 m
F.S.L. of distributary = 209.1 m
Silt factor = 0.8
Assumed safe exit gradient = 1/5

Solution: (A). Design of Cross Regulator

* Crest Levels. It is kept same as u/s bed level of parent channel = FSL of the parent channel u/s - Depth of water in th
= 207.5 m
Provide crest at R.L. 207.5 m
* Waterway

Ignoring velocity head,

Q = B . √h [ 1.69 h + 3.54 h1 ]
In this case, B = clear waterway required.
h = u/s FSL - d/s FSL = 0.2 m
h1 = d/s FSL - Crest level = 2.3 m
Putting the values in the above formula,
or, 140 = B . √0.2 [ 1.69 x 0.2 + 3.54 x 2.3 ]
or, B= 36.91622 36.9 m

Providing No. of bays = 5

Width of each bay = 8m
So, Clear Waterway = 40 m

No. of piers = 4
Width of each pier = 1.5 m
Hence, Overall waterway = 46 m

* Downstream floor level or Cistern Level

 q = Discharge/Clear waterway = 3.5 cumecs/metre
HL = 0.2 m
Also, we know from table, Ef2 = 1.85 m
d/s floor level = d/s FSL - Ef2
= 207.95 m
d/s bed level = d/s FSL - Depth of water
= 207.3 m , which is lower than the calculated d/s floor level.
Hence, provide the cistern or d/s floor at R.L. 207.3 m.

* Length of d/s floor required. = 5(y2 -y1)

For Ef2 = 1.85 m , y2 = 1.8 m
For Ef1 = Ef2 + HL =
= 2.05 m , y1 = 0.8 m
\ 5(y2 -y1) = 5 m, (Subjected to the limitation of 2/3rd of total floor length b)

* Vertical Cut-offs.
Provide upstream cut-off for a depth = ((y u/3) + 0.6 )
= 1.433333 1.43 m, below the floor, i.e. the level of its bottom =

Downstream cutoff Depth = ((yd/2) + 0.6 )

= 1.85 m
Hence, the bottom level of d/s cutoff = 205.45 m
Total Floor Length from Exit Gradient Considerations.
where H = Maximum static head
H = u/s FSL - d/s Bed Level
= 2.7 m
d = Depth of d/s cutoff = 1.85 m
GE = 0.20 (given)
or, 1/(π . √λ ) = 0.137037 0.137
For 1/(π . √λ ) = 0.137, α= 9
\ b = αd = 16.65 17 m
Minimum d/s floor length required
= 2/3 b 11.33333 11.3 m ; which is greater than 5(y2 - y1), i.e. 5 m.

Glacis length = 2h = 0.4 m

Balance length = 5.3 m, is provided as u/s floor length as shown.

Calculations for Uplift Pressures.

* Upstream Cut-off
d= 1.43 m
b= 17 m
1/α = d/b = 0.084118 0.084
From plate 11.1(a) S.K.Garg Book,
ФE1 = 100 %
ФD1 = 100 - ФD = 81.5 %
ФC1 = 100 - ФC = 73.5 %
 Assume u/s floor thickness = 0.5 m
Correction to Фc₁ for floor thickness = 2.797203 2.8 % (+ve)

\ ФC1 (Corrected) = 76.3 % (Correction due to pile interference is neglected)

* Downstream Cut-off
d= 1.85 m
b= 17 m
1/α = d/b = 0.108824 0.109
From plate 11.1(a) S.K.Garg Book,
ФE2 = ФE = 30 %
ФD2 = ФD = 21 %
ФC2 = 0%
Assume d/s floor thickness = 0.7 m
Correction to ФE2 for floor thickness = -3.405405 -3.4 % (- ve)

\ ФE2 (Corrected) = 26.6 % (Correction due to pile interference is neglected)

* Floor Thickness: D/S Floor.

At Toe of Glacis.
% pressure at toe of glacis = 59.63588 59.6 %
Maximum unbalanced head at toe of glacis due to maximum static head (2.7 m) = 1.6092
Head due to dynamic action can be taken as = 50% (y2 - y1) + Ф. HL
= 0.6192 m < 1.61 m
Hence, static head governs the thickness.
\ Thickness required at toe of glacis = 1.298387 1.3 m, Provide =

At 3m beyond toe of glacis, Distance = 8.3 m

% pressure = 50.86529 50.9 %
Maximum unbalanced head = 50.9% x 2.7 = 1.3743 1.37 m
\ Thickness required = 1.104839 1.1 m

At 8 m beyond toe of glacis, Distance = 3.3 m

% pressure = 36.24765 36.2 %
Maximum unbalanced head = 36.2% x 2.7 = 0.9774 0.98 m
\ Thickness required = 0.790323 0.8 m

* U/S Floor: Provide a nominal thickness of 0.5 m.

* U/S Protection.
Provided for a scour depth = ((yu/3) + 0.6 )
= 1.433333 1.43 m
Launching Apron. Provided thickness = 1.2 m
Length = 2.68125 2.7 m (Volume required = 2.25 D cumecs/met

* D/S Protection.
 Provided for a scour depth = ((yd/2) + 0.6 )
= 1.85 1.85 m
Launching Apron. Provided thickness = 1.2 m
Length = 3.46875 3.5 m (Volume required = 2.25 D cumecs/met

Inverted Filter. Length of filter required (1.5 times D/s scour depth) = 2.775 2.78

(B). Design of Distributary Head Regulator

From Lacey's regime Diagrams,
Bed width of such a channel = 15 m
Depth of water in the channel = 1.5 m
Bed level of distributary = FSL of distributary - Depth = 207.6 m

* Crest Level. Crest level of distributary head is generally kept 0.3 to 1.0 m higher than the bed level of parent channe
Height above the parent channel = 0.5 m
\ Crest Level = 208.1 m

* Waterway.
Q = B . √h [ 1.69 h + 3.54 h1 ]
In this case, B = clear waterway required.
h = FSL of parent channel - FSL of distributary = 0.9 m
h1 = FSL of distributary - Crest level = 1m
Q= 15 cumecs
Putting the values in the above formula,
or, 15 = B . √0.9 [ 1.69 x 0.9 + 3.54 x 1.0 ]
or, B= 3.124163 3.1 m, which is very small as compared to bed width of distributary, i.e. 15

Providing No. of bays = 2

Width of each bay = 3m
So, Clear Waterway = 6m

No. of piers = 1
Width of each pier = 1m
Hence, Overall waterway = 7m

* Downstream floor level or Cistern Level

q = Discharge/Clear waterway = 2.5 cumecs/metre
HL = FSL of parent channel - FSL of distributary =
= 0.9 m
Also, we know from table, Ef2 = 1.8 m
For Ef2 = 1.8 m , y2 = 1.7 m
For Ef1 = Ef2 + HL =
= 2.7 m , y1 = 0.4 m
R.L. of cistern (i.e. d/s floor) = d/s FSL - E f2
= 207.3 m
Hence, provide the cistern or d/s floor at R.L. 207.3 m.
 Length of d/s floor required. = 5(y 2 -y1)
\ 5(y2 -y1) = 6.5 m, (Subjected to the limitation of 2/3rd of total floor length b)

* Vertical Cut-offs.
Provide upstream cut-off for a depth = ((y u/3) + 0.6 )
= 1.1 1.1 m, below the floor, i.e. the bottom level of u/s cu

Downstream cutoff Depth = ((yd/2) + 0.6 )

= 1.35 m, Provide = 1.6 m
Hence, the bottom level of d/s cutoff = 205.7 m

Total Floor Length from Exit Gradient Considerations.

where H = Maximum static head
H = u/s Parent FSL - d/s Bed Level of distributary
= 2.7 m
d = Depth of d/s cutoff = 1.6 m
GE = 0.20 (given)
or, 1/(π . √λ ) = 0.118519 0.119
For 1/(π . √λ ) = 0.119, α= 13
\ b = αd = 20.8 21 m
Minimum d/s floor length required
= 2/3 b 14 14 m ; which is greater than 5(y2 - y1), i.e. 6.5 m.

Length of u/s glacis = 2h = 1.8 m

Length of crest = 1m
Length of u/s glacis = 0.8 m
Total = 3.6 m
Balance length = 3.4 m, is provided as u/s floor length as shown.

Calculations for Uplift Pressures.

* Upstream Cut-off
d= 1.1 m
b= 21 m
1/α = d/b = 0.052381 0.052
From plate 11.1(a) S.K.Garg Book,
ФE1 = 100 %
ФD1 = 100 - ФD = 83.5 %
ФC1 = 100 - ФC = 76 %
Assume u/s floor thickness = 0.5 m
Correction to Фc₁ for floor thickness = 3.409091 3.4 % (+ve)

\ ФC1 (Corrected) = 79.4 % (Correction due to pile interference is neglected)

* Downstream Cut-off
d= 1.6 m
 b= 21 m
1/α = d/b = 0.07619 0.076
From plate 11.1(a) S.K.Garg Book,
ФE2 = ФE = 25.5 %
ФD2 = ФD = 17.5 %
ФC2 = 0%
Assume d/s floor thickness = 0.8 m
Correction to ФE2 for floor thickness = -4 -4 % (- ve)

\ ФE2 (Corrected) = 21.5 % (Correction due to pile interference is neglected)

* Floor Thickness: D/S Floor.

At Toe of Glacis.
% pressure at toe of glacis = 60.1 60.1 %
Maximum unbalanced head at toe of glacis due to maximum static head (2.7 m) = 1.6227
Head due to dynamic action can be taken as = 50% (y2 - y1) + Ф. HL
= 1.1909 m < 1.62 m
Hence, static head governs the thickness.
\ Thickness required at toe of glacis = 1.306452 1.3 m, Provide =

At 3 m beyond toe of glacis, Distance = 11 m

% pressure = 51.82857 51.8 %
Maximum unbalanced head = 51.8% x 2.7 = 1.3986 1.4 m
\ Thickness required = 1.129032 1.1 m

At 6 m beyond toe of glacis, Distance = 8m

% pressure = 43.55714 43.6 %
Maximum unbalanced head = 43.6% x 2.7 = 1.1772 1.18 m
\ Thickness required = 0.951613 1m

At 10 m beyond toe of glacis, Distance = 4m

% pressure = 32.52857 32.5 %
Maximum unbalanced head = 32.5% x 2.7 = 0.8775 0.88 m
\ Thickness required = 0.709677 0.7 m

* U/S Floor: Provide a nominal thickness of 0.5 m.

* U/S Protection. Same as provided in the u/s cross regulator.

* D/S Protection.
Provided for a scour depth = ((yd/2) + 0.6 )
= 1.35 1.35 m
Launching Apron. Provided thickness = 1.2 m
Length = 2.53125 2.5 m (Volume required = 2.25 D cumecs/met

Inverted Filter. Length of filter required (1.5 times D/s scour depth) = 2.025 2.03
Provide 3 rows of C.C. Blocks of 0.8 m x 0.6 m size with 10 cm jhories filled with bajri, laid over 0.6m thick inverted fi
OF TECHNOLOGY ALLAHABAD, PRAYAGRAJ
URCES ENGINEERING II
L SHEET- 5
UP: CE-2

parent channel with the following data :

nnel u/s - Depth of water in the parent channel

ated d/s floor level.

f total floor length b)

.e. the level of its bottom = 206.07 m

y1), i.e. 5 m.
 1.61 m

1.4 m

equired = 2.25 D cumecs/meter)

equired = 2.25 D cumecs/meter)

the bed level of parent channel water in the parent channel.

d width of distributary, i.e. 15.4 m.

d of total floor length b)

.e. the bottom level of u/s cut-off = 206.2 m

f distributary

y1), i.e. 6.5 m.

 1.62 m

1.4 m

equired = 2.25 D cumecs/meter)

m
laid over 0.6m thick inverted filter.
 MOTILAL NEHRU NATIONAL INSTITUTE
ALLAHABAD, PRAYAGR
CE-1802 WATER RESOURCE ENG
GROUP- CE2
D. CANAL REGULATORS

7Given
Discharge of river 8100cumecs
Velocity head due to river at approach 0.19m
Discharge of canal 180cumecs
FSL of canal 260.2m
Bed level of canal 257.2m
Safe exit gradient 0.2
Crest level of undersluices 257m
Pond level 260.6m
u/s HFL 263.2m
Silt factor 1
Specific gravity 2.24
Crest level of regulator
258.5m
(1.5m higher than crest level of undersluices)

Waterway(B)
Q = B.√h[1.69h + 3.54h1] 180cumecs
h=Pond level - FSL of canal 0.400000000000034 m
h1= FSL of canal - Crest Level of regulator 1.69999999999999 m
B(rounded to multiple of 5) 45.00 m
Number of bays 9.00
Number of piers 8.00
Width of each piers 1.50 m
Total waterway width 57.00 m

Cistern Level
Q=Cd*A*√2gh
Cd 0.62
h 3.00 m
A 37.84 m2
V 4.76 m/s
Entry head loss 0.58 m
TEL just u/s of gate 263.39 m
TEL just d/s of gate 262.81 m
u/s TEL 262.81 m
d/s TEL 260.20 m
q=Q/B 3.16 cumecs/metre
HL 2.61 m
Ef2 2.75 m
Ef1=Ef2+HL 5.36 m
d/s floor level=d/s TEL - Ef2 257.50 m
Provide cistern at RL 257.5m

Length of d/s floor

y2 2.67 m
y1 0.45 m
Length of d/s floor= 5(y2-y1) 12.00 m

Vertical cut-offs
d/s cut-off
q 3.16 m
Scour depth R= 1.35(q2/f)1/3 2.91 m
Depth of d/s cut-off below water level= 1.5*R 4.36 m
Bottom level of d/s cut-off 255.84 m
Depth of d/s cut-off below floor level 1.66 m

u/s cut-off
Bottom level of u/s cut-off below water level = 1.25*R 3.63 m
Bottom level of u/s cut-off 259.57 (>257)
Depth of u/s cut-off below floor level 4.00 m
Bottom level of u/s cut-off 253.00 m

Total floor length from exit gradient considerations

GE=(H/d)*(1/π√l) 0.20 eq.(1)

H= u/s FSL - d/s bed level 5.70 m
d=Depth of d/s cutoff 4.00 m

From eq(1) , l= 5.14

ɑ 9.23 m
b=ɑd 37.00 m
Provide total floor length of 37m.
d/s horizontal length 12.00 m
Glacis d/s length 3.00 m
Crest length 1.00 m
u/s floor length 21.00 m

Calculation of uplift pressures

u/s cut-off
d 4.00 m
b 37.00 m
ɑ 9.25
l 5.15
ɸE1 100.00%
ɸE 29.04%
ɸD 20.17%
ɸC1=100-ɸE 70.96%
ɸD1=100-ɸD 79.83%

Assume, u/s floor thickness 0.50 m

Correction to ɸC1 for floor thickness 1%(+ve)
D 0.66 m
d 4.00 m
Correction due to mutual interference 0.32%(+ve)
Corrected ɸC1 72.38%

d/s cut-off
d 4.00 m
b 37.00 m
ɑ 9.25
l 5.15
ɸE2=ɸE 29.04%
ɸD2=ɸD 20.17%
ɸC2 0.00%

Assume, d/s floor thickness 1.00 m

Correction to ɸE2 for floor thickness 2.22%(-ve)
D 3.50 m
d 1.66 m
Correction due to mutual interference 0.81%(-ve)
Corrected ɸE2 26.01%

Floor thickness
d/s floor

At d/s end 0.00 m

%pressure 26.01%
Head ,h 1.48 m
Thickness, t=h/(G-1) 1.20 m

Distance from d/s end 4.00 m

%pressure at toe of glacis 31.02%
Head ,h 1.77 m
Thickness, t=h/(G-1) 1.50 m

Distance from d/s end 8.00 m

%pressure at toe of glacis 36.04%
Head ,h 2.05 m
Thickness, t=h/(G-1) 1.70 m
Distance from d/s end 12.00 m
%pressure at toe of glacis 41.05%
Head ,h 2.34 m
Thickness, t=h/(G-1) 1.90 m

u/s floor
Nominal thickness of 0.5 m is provided.

Protection Works
d/s protection
Anticipated scour= 2R 5.81 m
The level of d/s scour hole= d/s water level - 2R 254.39 m
Scour depth(D) below d/s floor 3.11 m
Launching apron
Length= 1.5D 4.67 m
Thickness, t =2.25D/L 1.50 m
u/s protection
Anticipated scour= 1.5R 4.36 m
The level of u/s scour hole= pond level - 1.5R 256.24 m
Scour depth(D) below u/s floor 0.76 m
Launching apron
Thickness, t 1.50 m
Length = 2.25D/t 1.14 m
U NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
ALLAHABAD, PRAYAGRAJ
WATER RESOURCE ENGINEERING II
GROUP- CE2

cumecs/metre
[Obtain from HL vs Ef2 curve for a given q]

[Obtain from Ef vs y curve for a given q]

[Obtain from Ef vs y curve for a given q]
 WATER FLOW
U/S

H.F.L 263.2

BREAST WALL
72.38%

POND LEVEL 260.6

GATE
RL258.5

1:3
26.01%

RL257.5
C2 E2 RL257

C1 E1
D2 12 3 1
255.84 21

D1
37 253

All dimensions in metres.