Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Δm/product ton (g/ton) 0 - 0.17001823260921 Wear rate (%) 0.00% 0.43% 3.35%

    Uploaded by

    Dương Quang Khánh
    34 views6 pages
    The document contains measurements from a grinding table and cement mill rollers from their original state and on November 7, 2019. It shows the height worn and mass worn on different parts of the grinding table and rollers over time. The wear rates for the table liner increased from 0.43% originally to 3.35% on the later date. The roller wear rates also increased over time, with roller 1 at 2.77%, roller 2 at 2.71%, and roller 3 at 2.20% on the later date.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains measurements from a grinding table and cement mill rollers from their original state and on November 7, 2019. It shows the height worn and mass worn on different parts of the grinding table and rollers over time. The wear rates for the table liner increased from 0.43% originally to 3.35% on the later date. The roller wear rates also increased over time, with roller 1 at 2.77%, roller 2 at 2.71%, and roller 3 at 2.20% on the later date.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    34 views6 pages

    Δm/product ton (g/ton) 0 - 0.17001823260921 Wear rate (%) 0.00% 0.43% 3.35%

    Uploaded by

    Dương Quang Khánh
    The document contains measurements from a grinding table and cement mill rollers from their original state and on November 7, 2019. It shows the height worn and mass worn on different parts of the grinding table and rollers over time. The wear rates for the table liner increased from 0.43% originally to 3.35% on the later date. The roller wear rates also increased over time, with roller 1 at 2.77%, roller 2 at 2.71%, and roller 3 at 2.20% on the later date.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    Date Original March 2, 2016 November 7, 2019

    ΔV (m3) 0.00
    Δm (kg) 0.00 90,169.60 707,510.33 4.00%
    Operation time (h) 0 0 - 3.50%
    Product (ton) 0 - 4,161,379.16 3.00%

    Wear rate (%)


    Δm/product ton (g/ton) 0 - 0.170018232609212.50%
    2.00%
    Wear rate (%) 0.00% 0.43% 3.35% 1.50%
    Performance (ton/h) 1.00%
    Grinding Pressure (bar) 0.50%
    0.00%
    Electric Consumption 0.00%
    Original
    Est. lifetime based on 7% (h) 30145.3813982832
    Est. rehardfacing time (date)
    Grinding Weight (g) 21,090,000.00 20,999,830.40 20,382,489.67

    H: height was worn out compared with original(mm)


    d: individual mass(kg/m3)
    ΔV: volume was worn out compared with original (m3)
    Δm: mass was worn out compared with original (kg)

    Grinding Table March 2, 2016 November 7, 2019


    Measurepoint Value Value
    H1 0 21.33
    H2 0 10.33
    H3 2 4
    H4 1 11.67
    H5 2 20
    Location
    H6 3 21.33
    H7 3 7
    H8 2 4.33
    H9 0 4.67
    H10 0 9.67
    H11 0 7.33
    Table Liner Wear rate
    4.00%
    3.35%
    3.50%
    3.00%
    Wear rate (%)

    2.50%
    2.00%
    1.50%
    1.00% 0.43%
    0.50%
    0.00%
    0.00%
    Original March 2, 2016 November 7, 2019
    Date
    Date Original November 7, 2019
    Roller 1 2 3 1 2
    ΔV (m3)
    Δm (kg) 262367.38 256635.36
    Operation time (h)
    Product (ton) -
    Δm/product ton (g/ton)
    Grinding Weight (g) 9470000 9207632.62 9213364.64
    Wear rate (%) Roller 1 0.00% 2.77%
    Wear rate (%) Roller 2 0.00% 2.71%
    Wear rate (%) Roller 3 0.00%
    Performance (ton/h) - - - - -
    Grinding Pressure (bar) - - - - -
    Electric Consumption - - - - -
    Est. lifetime based on 7% (h) - - - - -
    Est. rehardfacing time (date) - - - - -

    H: height was worn out compared with original(mm)


    d: individual mass(kg/m3)
    ΔV: volume was worn out compared with original (m3)
    Δm: mass was worn out compared with original (kg)

    Grinding Table Original November 7, 2019


    Roller 1 2 3 1
    H1 0 0 0 11.25
    H2 0 0 0 6.00
    H3 0 0 0 5.00
    H4 0 0 0 5.00
    Location
    H5 0 0 0 6.50
    H6 0 0 0 8.25
    H7 0 0 0 8.50
    H8 0 0 0 5.50
    H9 0 0 0 2.25
    W e ar Rate
    mber 7, 2019
    3 1 2 3
    3.00%

    208661.99 2.50%

    2.00%
    196068.75
    1.064228695 1.50%
    9261338.01
    1.00%

    0.50%

    2.20% 0.00%
    0.00%
    - - - - Original

    - - - -
    - - - -
    - - - -
    - - - -
    Cem

    November 7, 2019
    2 3 1 2 3
    9.00 10.25
    5.00 3.25
    0.75 0.25
    2.25 1
    7.00 3.75
    10.00 8.75
    12.00 10.5
    9.25 5
    0.25 4
    3.00%
    2.77%
    2.71%
    2.50%
    2.20%
    2.00%

    1.50%

    1.00%

    0.50%

    0.00%
    0.00%
    Original November 7, 2019

    Date

    Cement Mill Roller Wear Rate

    You might also like