Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maxwell Case Study
Maxwell Case Study
Ajith Wallawita
2
Contents
1. Introduction 3
5. Recommendation 10-11
6. Conclusions 12
7. References 13-16
Ajith Wallawita
3
Introduction
In order to examine the poor performance or negligence of corporate governance and lack of
corporate legislations for the companies I have used case study approach and have chosen
Maxwell Corporation and corporate scandals. It is really important to discuss real life situations
in relates to the Corporate Governance. The approach of this case study is discussing number of
corporate governance issues in this case study it was Maxwell Corporation. Also this report first
part analyze the Maxwell communication corporations scandals for the last decade and reasons
to those scandals and what are the corporate governance solution in order to overcome fraud. In
the later of the report some discussion were point out such as literature about importance of the
corporate governance and history of the corporate governance final part produce some
recommendations to overcome fraud and reinstate investors confidence on their investments.
Also it discussed some theories relates to corporate governance and its issues including
limitations.
Ajith Wallawita
4
Robert Maxwell is communication proprietor who was well known in the communication
industry since 1960. In 1969 Maxwell have merge his Pergamon Company with Saul Steinburg
(Head of Leasco). So when Leasco purchase Pergamon press where Maxwell acts as a
subordinate role in the merge company. Leasco was profitable business with claiming $27m
profit and more than $1 bn total assets in the year of 1968. So Maxwell wanted to account of his
company substantial profit at that time so that support share price and assist Maxwell negotiation
with Leasco. That time Sunday time queried about the procedures used by Audit Company about
Pergamon’s accounts. It was alleged that stocks had been overvalued. Also Leasco financial
advisers have questioned about pergamon’s accounts information as it difficult to extract and
they questioned from Maxwell about Pergamon’s profitability.
According to the independent audit carried out by Martin Harris in 1968 have disclosed that
Pergamon’s profit was $140,000 instead of $2.1m. After this report Pergamon’s auditors
resigned and board of trade or DTI investigated Maxwell in 1969. Report mentioned that
Maxwell is not suitable or reliable person to exercise proper methods for public quoted company.
Price water house have carried out some investigation and it indicate the important of unify
accounting standards. This report was regarded as valuable addition to the accounting profession.
After this report accounting standard committee had been setup in order to unify the accounting
standards in financial reporting treatments and audits. But governments were invited by
accounting professional to include some minimum standard to the financial reporting and
auditing.
Once Maxwell communication were labeled as improper use funds in 1990 as MCC had to
repay its part of $3 billion borrowings and due to lack of funds company face crisis. In order to
save from financial crisis Maxwell made decision to float 49% of Mirror group shares but then
Maxwell pledging shares in MCC as Collateral for loans. In 1991 Maxwell ran sorts of cash and
he sold the Dutch group Elsevier for $440. MGN and MCC shares were pledged as collateral for
further loans to his private companies. Maxwell also used pension fund amount of $767 million
to make some large investments in his corporation shares. This transaction was covered from
pension trusties as it was window dressed from its accounts. Maxwell Empire was collapsed
soon after death of Maxwell. Also his two sons got arrested by London police due some serious
Ajith Wallawita
5
frauds which was disclosed they have debts of $400 million. Also Goldman Sachs was affected
from its relevant regularities as they were disciplined.
After the collapse of the organization many pensioners suffered anxiety and loss and employees
of Maxwell organization suffered uncertainty and redundancies due to pension fund assets are
worthless when company goes to liquidation. Maxwell should have sold all his assets for the
requirement of the cash for the fund requirements. Instead of use of pension funds in improper
way putting pensioners in deep trouble. Also he used loans to support Maxwell private
companies was not good governance. Also Maxwell hidden the transparency of the loans he
took. It is fair to hide business decisions but shareholders have rights to know how loans were
used. Maximum time one accountancy or audit firm can audit the books of particular company or
group of companies should be limited or reduce. In this case Maxwell corporation auditor has
worked with them since the early seventies and due the long term relationship with company the
window dressing was allowed to hide information.
One of other corporate governance issue with the Maxwell Corporation was Independent non
executive directors. Maxwell had control power over MGN as he was an executive chairman and
the independent directors had not been effective while excising control over the chairman.
Maxwell had not reacted favorably when he was told to that non executive directors should
appointed and then he agreed to appoint Independent non executive director as it important but
non executive directors had no function in Maxwell corporation. Independent non executive
should be in the board with enough power should have their hands on the decision on the board.
Also Independent non executive directors should be able to bare independent judgment on issues
such as strategy performance, resources and standard of conduct. Also they should be freed from
business or other matters which could affect their independent judgment exercise.
Another issue with Maxwell Corporation was power of authority. Maxwell death had revealed
lot of controversial business dealings and activities. Also Maxwell had used hundreds of millions
of pounds from his company’s pension fund to finance for corporate debt and his takeovers and
lavish lifestyle without relevant approval. In 1992 Maxwell had filed for bankruptcy. Also his
two sons were declared bankrupt with debts of $400 million. Also both sons went trial for
serious fraud with two former directors in 1995. Basically company board should have clearly
accepted division of responsibilities for the head of the company. Clear defined responsibilities
ensure the balance of power and authority. But unlikely this company where Maxwell holds the
chairman and chief executive may allow for the corporate governance issues. Company like
Maxwell Corporation should have strong and independent party on the board with another senior
member on board which could avoid serious fraud such as window dressing in financial
statements.
Ajith Wallawita
6
This whole fraud were caused due to irresponsible work of Maxwell as director and his sons
Kevin and Ian due to substantial support they were given to Maxwell. Also they signed
documents without considering the implications. Also these errors made help of the accountants
and auditors due to report those pension funds issues in the financial statements. Also Goldman
Sachs who were responsible for manipulation of the Maxwell communication corporation.
Ajith Wallawita
7
Corporate governance is varying country to country but Millstein report it has four core
objectives which are fairness, transparency, accountability and responsibility. Ensure the
protection of company shareholders and all equitable treatment of all shareholders defines as
fairness. Transparency is about providing clear comparable corporate information by the timely
and quality disclosure as adequate manner about company performance, governance and
ownership (OECD 2004). Corporate information disclose by published annual company reports.
Quality of the corporate governance displays the extent of information disclosure of the
company. Disclosures may commissioned by existing laws and voluntary and mostly it’s include
Ajith Wallawita
8
According to Gregory and Simms (1999) states that quality of the corporate governance and
disclosures may impact on the ability to attract low cost capital. Corporate governance proves the
way of company performance and it may help to attract relatively cheaper capital both locally
and internationally. Also good corporate governance will boost company image and will increase
the investors’ confidence about company image. Investors would be happy to invest the
companies who have greater good governance practice as it ensure the companies have more
secure position and have greater protection to the investment.
Ajith Wallawita
9
In the United Kingdom regulation of the business activities governed by serious of legislative
texts and orders. United Kingdom legal framework applied in UK regarding corporate
governance as follows,
Corporate governance of the UK regulated by series of legislative texts and the important of
which is the combined code on corporate governance as mentioned above. In the United
Kingdom specific codes include some provisions that relevant to all aspects of the Corporate
Governance and in some cases such as merger additional provision may be required.
Ajith Wallawita
10
Recommendations
Maxwell communications main issue was lack of internal control system. Also if auditors and
regulators insisted on changes the amount of fraud caused would have been more less damage.
DTI have suggested that although there were many of the deficiencies in legislation and
regulation which was allowed the events at Mirror group to happen have been sorted, but still
remain some important questionnaires to being addressed or consider such as,
Give some more assistance to and boost training for trustees who perform vital role in
company stewardship and investment of pension funds schemes.
Implement statement of guidance on the role and duties of consultants and advisors on
flotation.
Construct some radical changes by imposing some heavy fines and sanction against
companies and organization who do not report fraud activities.
Input some regulation of the market in securities to give more effective control over firms
which operate on a transnational basis to make sure that company runs fair, open and
transparent conduct of market and with some projection for the investment.
Give some detailed guidance to the auditors how to audit of business such as empires.
Provide more assurance on regarding the independence of the auditors as the public
expect auditors to be fairer and independent and discourage or impose ban on the firms
which act auditor and accountant for the same company as discouraging auditors who is
not independent could reduce the level of fraud.
Make non executive director more responsible in the organization and more accountable
also make separation for chairman and chief executives by giving some extra statutory
guidance on the duties of all directors.
Averting an expectation gap by causing public aware that regulation cannot provide
100% security of eliminating fraud, malpractice or manipulation of the markets.
In this Maxwell scandals most important lesson is highly ethical and professional standards must
put before the corporation advantage as reputations of the financial market depends on it. Also
on the other hand most affected victims of the major frauds is most of the time its employees
which defraud. Due to financial fraud so many careers and finance in the all levels could lose
their career for life. Most of the time big frauds occur for benefits of company owners or senior
management and not the employees. The biggest defense against fraud may be educated
Ajith Wallawita
11
workforce, so they can watch how their company performance and can put so much impact on
the company or organizations.
Furthermore in the past there was no such a guideline to follow and after the cases like Maxwell
questions were urged regarding the corporate governance. In 1992 Cadbury report was
introduces as first guideline in the world which aim to investigate corporate governance of the
companies in order to provide system which govern the company’s corporate governance and in
order to restore the investors’ confidence about in the system. After this many countries have
applied corporate governance for their country in order to avoid more fraud cases such as
Maxwell. After the introduction of the corporate governance there was positive impact on the
economic and social development due to corporate governance will stop further fraud cases due
to legislation.
Ajith Wallawita
12
Conclusions
The aim of this report to undertake an analysis issues of the corporate governance and corporate
governance scandals. As an example Maxwell communication corporation scandals were
analyzed. A through literature view has been taken into consideration in terms with corporate
governance and its importance, issues and limitations. In this case study many loop holes of the
lack of the corporate governance were discussed. Corporate governance history goes back to
early 1920. Corporate governance initially began with Cadbury report (1992) and later it was
added some provisions in to the corporate governance such as greenbury report (1995), Turn ball
report (1999/2005) and combines code (1998/2003). After several years corporate governance
became hot topic following UK Company listing rules in 1998. These corporate governance
disclosures have impact on the investments as good governance organizations attract more
capital and bad governance companies share plunged. So introduction of corporate governance
have benefited to those who are running fairly and efficiently.
Last decade of twenty first century has produce big corporate scandals in the UK such as
Maxwell scandals which were mainly lack of corporate governance. After those scandals
investors and public faith on the companies have lost and its affected UK economy badly. As a
result of Maxwell scandals and other corporate scandals Cadbury report 1992 was introduced.
The relationship between corporate governance and corporate is very essential and strong.
Mainly scandals were aroused due to lack of control system. As a solution for that corporate
governance was formed and it provide important controls on the companies in order to avoid any
misbehaving and fraud and it provide assurance to the investors about their investments
confirming that their investment is safe and secure.
Ajith Wallawita
13
References
1. Bavly, D.A, 1999, Corporate Governance and Accountability; what role for the Regulator,
publishers, London
5. Carson, T.L, Self-Interest and Business Ethics: Some Lessons of the Recent Corporate
11. Drennan et al, 2001, From Cadbury to Turnbull: Finding a place for Risk Management,
12. Deakin & Konzelmann, S & S, April 2004, Learning from Enron, Volume 12, Issue 2,
Ajith Wallawita
14
Economist, 2004, Leaders: Reversed and remanded; Arthur Andersen. London: Vol.375, Issue
8429; pg. 13
14. Financial Reporting Council, 2005, FRC Review Endorses the Turnbull Guidance.
15. Financial Services Authority, May 2000, The Combined Code, Principles of good
16. Freeman, R.E, 1984, p32, Strategic Planning: a Stakeholder Approach, Pitman publish.
17. Gordon, J, 2003, Governance Failures of the Enron Board and the New Information Order of
Auditors
22. Institute of Chartered Accountants for England and Wales, 2002, what is Corporate
23. Institute of Chartered Accountants for England and Wales, Corporate governance
developmentsintheUK, 2006
Ajith Wallawita
15
24. Institute of Internal Auditors UK and Ireland, Effective Governance, Practical Guide on
25. Institute of Chartered Accountants for England and Wales, What is Corporate Governance?
26. London School of Economics, 2004, London's Place in the UK Economy, 2004.
27. London Stock Exchange, 2006, Response to Financial Reporting Council's Review on the
combined code
Services.
32. Picard, R, The Rise and Fall of Communication Empires, The Journal of Media Economics,
p23-
Compliance
34. Report of the committee, Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, December 1992, Gee
Publishing
Crises Generic Failure Types: Boiled Frogs, Drowned Frogs, Bullfrogs and Tadpoles, Sheffield.
Ajith Wallawita
16
36. Rinninsland, R, 2003, Understanding the Act of Sarbanes Oxley 2002, Council for
37. Rouston, K, Regulation in the post Enron World, Financial Services Authority, International
38. Shaou, J, 2001, The Maxwell report: a revealing picture of life in the City of London, World
Socialist, Published by the International committee for the Fourth International (ICFI).
39. Stock Market Crash, South Sea Bubble, 2005, [online.]. From: http://www.stock-market-
crash.net/southsea.htm
40.Tricker, R.I, Corporate Governance, Practices, procedures and powers in British companies
and their boards of Directors, The Corporate Policy Group, Oxford, Gower publishing Group
Ajith Wallawita