Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Er-Pr Pharmdx Interpretation Manual PDF
Er-Pr Pharmdx Interpretation Manual PDF
ER/PR pharmDx TM
Interpretation Manual
ER PR
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. FDA 510(k) cleared as an aid in identifying patients eligible for treatment with anti-hormonal
or aromatase inhibitor therapies as well as an aid in the prognosis and management of breast cancer.
Table of Contents
table of Contents
n ER/PR pharmDxTM Concordance to the n Estrogen Receptor
Allred Procedure
n Progesterone Receptor
n Determination of the Cut-off IHC Score
Welcome to the ER/PR pharmDx™ The ER/PR pharmDxTM Interpretation Manual objectives
Interpretation Manual are simple:
This guide for pathologists includes key technical n To ensure that the ER/PR pharmDxTM assay is being
histological staining and interpretation tips applicable performed consistent with Dako recommendations for
when using the ER/PR pharmDxTM kit. Utilization of the optimal results.
suggestions that follow will ensure that your laboratory
n To encourage reproducible results by introducing a
achieves the quality results expected from ER/PR
standard approach to staining and interpretation.
pharmDxTM.
The ER/PR pharmDxTM Kit is a semi-quantitative ER/PR pharmDx™ Provides the Basis
immunohistochemical (IHC) assay to identify estrogen for Reliable ER and PR Assessment
receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression n FDA 510(k) cleared, standard, reproducible assay.
in normal and neoplastic tissues, formalin-fixed and
n New, highly specific ER antibody cocktail and PR
paraffin-embedded for histological evaluation. ER/PR
antibody with demonstrated sensitivity and specificity.
pharmDxTM specifically detects the ER alpha protein as
n Optimized protocol with clinically validated scoring
well as the PR protein located in the nuclei of ER and
system for the determination of ER/PR status
PR-expressing cells, respectively.
applicable in the management of breast cancer
Investigations into the biological mechanisms for breast
patients.5-9
cancer have found that the growth rate is dependent on
n Concordance demonstrated between ER/PR
the presence of estrogen or progesterone or both in most
pharmDxTM and an established reference method
breast cancers. Thus, estrogen receptor and proges-
with positive/negative cut-off IHC score calibrated
terone receptor status in breast cancer is considered to
using samples with known biochemical and clinical
be a validated prognostic and predictive factor for patient
response data.10
management for anti-hormonal therapy.1-5
n Verified cut-off IHC score for positivity for
ER/PR pharmDxTM is indicated as an aid in identifying
ER/PR pharmDxTM.
patients eligible for treatment with anti-hormonal or
aromatase inhibitor therapies, as well as an aid in the n FDA clearance and confidence in test sensitivity and
prognosis and management of breast cancer. specificity lessens the burden of extensive validation
by laboratory staff.
overview
The ER/PR pharmDxTM Kit is a semi-quantitative IHC molecules linked to a common dextran polymer back-
assay to identify ER and PR expression in normal and bone. Enzymatic conversion of the subsequently added
neoplastic tissues, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded chromogen results in formation of a visible reaction
for histological evaluation. ER/PR pharmDx TM
specifically product at the antigen site. The specimens may then be
detects ER alpha protein as well as the PR protein located counterstained and coverslipped. Results are interpreted
in the nuclei of ER and PR-expressing cells, respectively. using a light microscope. Control slides containing two
Following incubation of the primary monoclonal antibody formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human cell lines are
The ER/PR pharmDx Kit
to human ER or PR proteins or the Negative Control provided for quality control of the kit reagent performance.
Reagent, this validated protocol employs a ready-to-use A minimum of four slides per patient sample is required:
visualization reagent based on dextran technology. one slide for tumor presence, one slide for ER protein
This reagent consists of both secondary goat anti-mouse evaluation, one slide for PR protein evaluation and one
antibody molecules and horseradish peroxidase slide for Negative Control Reagent.
™
The ER/PR pharmDx™ Kit Includes: Materials Required, but not Supplied:
n ER/PR pharmDxTM Mouse Anti-Human ER Antibody n Calibrated pressure cooker with the capability of
Cocktail ER Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Cocktail reaching and maintaining a temperature of 125 °C
(Clones 1D5 and ER-2-123) for 5 minutes
Historical studies have shown that ER/PR status is correlated with untreated outcome, Step 1
Epitope Retrieval in pressure
i.e. prognostic for well-differentiated invasive breast cancer, and especially correlated with cooker. Incubate 5 minutes at
response to anti-hormonal therapy. As shown in Table 1 below, a phenotype of ER and 125 °C.
Step 2
Application of ER/PR pharmDxTM
Table 1. Percent of Incidence and Response Rate of Estrogen Peroxidase-Blocking Reagent.
Receptor /Progesterone Receptor Expression Phenotypes Incubate 5 minutes.
Step 4
Application of ER/PR pharmDxTM
Visualization Reagent.
Incubate 30 minutes.
Step 5
Application of ER/PR pharmDxTM
DAB+ Substrate-Chromogen.
Incubate 10 minutes.
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves of DFS comparing IHC and LBA methods of assessing ER in the subset of patients receiving endocrine therapy. Used with permission of DC Allred, M.D.6
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves of DFS comparing IHC and LBA methods of assessing PR in the subset of patients receiving endocrine therapy. Used with permission of DC Allred, M.D.6
A pilot study comparing different assay procedures and of specimens using the Allred procedure as the reference
antibodies to the Allred procedure was performed on a method, compared to the ER/PR pharmDxTM staining
set of 20 tissues. The assay procedure and antibodies procedure, with all specimens graded and interpreted
that produced the most similar testing results to the Allred using the Allred scoring method. Distributions of staining
procedure were selected for further testing. 10
results for positive/negative determination are presented
in Tables 2 and 3 for ER and PR, respectively. Concor-
Concordance studies
The validity of the assay procedure and antibody
selection/dilution was tested on a set of specimens dance to the Allred method for positive/negative hormone
assembled in tissue arrays. Testing consisted of staining receptor result was 99% for both receptors.10
Table 2. Dako ER pharmDxTM Test Results Compared to Allred Procedure ER Test Results
Table 3. Dako PR pharmDxTM Test Results Compared to Allred Procedure PR Test Results
Figure 4
Univariate Disease-Free Survival (DFS) curves for all possible ER IHC scores in patients receiving adjuvant therapy.
Reprinted with permission from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Figure 5
Univariate Disease-Free Survival (DFS) curves for all possible PR IHC scores in patients receiving adjuvant therapy.
Reprinted with permission from Modern Pathology, 2004 Macmillian Publishers Ltd.9
ER/PR Expression
Liver (3) None None
Lung (3) None None
Mesothelial Cells (3) None None
Ovary (3)
Surface epithelium 0,0,2 0,3,3
Stromal cells None 0,3,3
Pancreas (3)
Islet cells* None 1,3,3
Parathyroid (3) None None
Peripheral Nerve (3) None None
Pituitary (3)
Pituicytes 0,1,3 1,2,3*
Prostate (3)
Stromal cells 1,1,2 0,2,2
Salivary Gland (3) None None
Skeletal Muscle (3) None None
Skin (3) None None
Small Intestine (3)
Muscularis propria None 0,0,2
Spleen (3) None None
Stomach (3) None None
Testis (3) None None
Thymus (3) None None
Thyroid (3) None None
Tonsil (3) None None
Uterus (3)
Endometrial glands 2,3,3 3,3,3 *
Endometrial stroma 2,2,3 3,3,3
Myometrium 2,3,3 3,3,3
The first quality control step for interpretation is the should give weak positive staining so that subtle changes
evaluation of the ER/PR pharmDxTM Control Slides. Each in the primary antibody sensitivity can be detected. The
of the supplied control slides contains two pelleted, control slides supplied with this system or specimens
formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human cell lines: one processed differently from the patient sample(s) validate
positive and one negative with ER and PR antibodies. reagent performance only and do not verify tissue
Two control slides should be run in each staining preparation.
procedure, one incubated with the ER antibody cocktail
Known positive tissue controls should only be utilized
and one incubated with the PR antibody. The evaluation of
for monitoring the correct performance of processed
the Dako supplied control slides indicates the validity of
tissues and test reagents, NOT as an aid in formulating a
the staining run. The control slides should not be used to
specific diagnosis of patient samples. If the positive tissue
aid in interpretation of patient results. If either of the con-
controls fail to demonstrate appropriate positive staining,
trol cell lines have staining results outside the acceptable
results with the test specimens should be considered
criteria, results from all of the test slides stained simulta-
invalid and the test should be repeated.
neously within the same run should be considered invalid
Quality Control
Use a negative control tissue (known to be ER and PR
and the test should be repeated.
negative) fixed, processed and embedded in the same
Tissue controls should be fresh biopsy/surgical specimens
manner as the patient sample(s) with each staining
fixed, processed and embedded as soon as possible in
run to verify the specificity of the primary antibody and
the same manner as the patient sample(s). Positive tissue
to indicate unintended cross-reactivity to cells/cellular
controls are indicative of correctly prepared tissues and
components. The variety of different cell types present in
proper staining techniques. One positive tissue control
most tissue sections offers internal negative control sites.
for each set of test conditions should be included in each
If specific staining occurs in the negative control tissue,
staining run. Endocervix is recommended as a control
results with the patient specimens should be considered
tissue that contains both ER and PR expressing cells.
invalid and the test should be repeated.
The specimens used for the positive tissue controls
Estrogen Receptor
Figure 6 Figure 7
CAMA-1 positive cell line control stained with ER from ER/PR pharmDxTM Kit; HT-29 negative cell line control stained with ER from ER/PR pharmDxTM Kit;
40x magnification 40x magnification
control slides
Progesterone Receptor
Figure 8 Figure 9
CAMA-1 positive cell line control stained with PR from ER/PR pharmDxTM Kit; HT-29 negative cell line control stained with PR from ER/PR pharmDxTM Kit;
40x magnification 40x magnification
ER PR
Intensity Score (based on 0-3 scale) 2-3 2-3
Control slides
Progesterone Receptor (CAMA-1)
Slide Evaluation Should be Performed by n A Proportion Score (PS) is assigned representing the
a Pathologist Using a Light Microscope proportion of tumor cells with positive nuclear staining.
ER/PR pharmDxTM stains cell nuclei when using n An Intensity Score (IS) is assigned representing the
evaluation & reporting
anti-ER and anti-PR. The immunostaining pattern in AVERAGE staining intensity of all positive tumor cells.
breast cancer is normally heterogeneous. Scoring is n A Total Score (TS) is the sum of PS plus IS (ranging
based on examination of all tumor cells on the slide. from 0, 2–8). A positive result for both ER and PR is
defined as TS ≥ 3, which was validated in numerous
large clinical studies.5-9
Figure 16
Allred Scoring Guidelines for ER/PR pharmDxTM
"MMSFE4DPSJOH(VJEFMJOFGPS&313QIBSN%Y
Scoring Guidelines (“Allred Score”) modified and used with the permission of D.C. Allred, M.D.6
1SPQPSUJPO
4DPSF
14
*OUFOTJUZ 5PUBM4DPSF 54
14*4
4DPSF
54SBOHF
m
*4
3CORING GUIDELINES COURTESY $# !LLRED -$
Total Score = PS + IS
Each Proportion Score encompasses a range represented by a whole number.
Scoring system
Figure 17
ER/PR pharmDxTM Positive/Negative Results
Negative Result
(TS = 0) ≤1% Positive >1% Positive
Figure 18 Figure 19
Breast cancer (PS 0) + (IS 0) = TS 0 → Negative Breast cancer (PS 1) + (IS 1) = TS 2 → Negative
Image Guide
Figure 20 Figure 21
Breast cancer (PS 3) + (IS 1) = TS 4 → Positive Breast cancer (PS 5) + (IS 1) = TS 6 → Positive
Figure 22 Figure 23
Breast cancer (PS 5) + (IS 2) = TS 7 → Positive Breast cancer (PS 5) + (IS 3) = TS 8 → Positive
PS = Proportion Score IS = Intensity Score TS = Total Score
Figure 24 Figure 25
Breast cancer (PS 0) + (IS 0) = TS 0 → Negative Breast cancer (PS 1) + (IS 1) = TS 2 → Negative
image guide
Figure 26 Figure 27
Breast cancer (PS 1) + (IS 2) = TS 3 → Positive Breast cancer (PS 3) + (IS 1) = TS 4 → Positive
Figure 28 Figure 29
Breast cancer (PS 4) + (IS 1) = TS 5 → Positive Breast cancer (PS 5) + (IS 3) = TS 8 → Positive
PS = Proportion Score IS = Intensity Score TS = Total Score
Image Guide
20x magnification 20x magnification
Figure 34 Figure 35
Breast cancer with normal breast (internal control) stained with ER; Breast cancer with normal breast (internal control) stained with PR;
(PS 3) + (IS 3) = TS 6; 20x magnification (PS 2) + (IS 1) = TS 3; 20x magnification
Endocervix Staining
Image guide
Figure 36 Figure 37
Endocervix stained with ER; 20x magnification Endocervix stained with PR; 20x magnification
Nuclear/Cytoplasmic Staining
Figure 38
Breast cancer stained with ER; Example of nuclear/cytoplasmic staining;
PS = Proportion Score IS = Intensity Score TS = Total Score
(PS 4) + (IS 3) = TS 7; 40x magnification
Figure 39 Figure 40
Breast cancer stained with ER; Example of breast carcinoma with adipocytes Breast cancer stained with ER; Example of unacceptable background staining
(PS 2) + (IS 2) = TS 4; 40x magnification Invalid test; 40x magnification
Artifacts
Description
Deparaffinized tissue and appropriate control tissue sections are stained using the FDA 510(k) cleared
Dako ER/PR pharmDxTM Immunohistochemistry Kit.
A positive result is based on nuclear staining within the tumor and defined as a Total Score of ≥3 using
the Allred Scoring Guidelines for ER/PR pharmDxTM.
Patient Result
Positive Negative
Estrogen Receptor
Progesterone Receptor
ER/PR pharmDxTM is indicated as an aid in identifying patients eligible for treatment with anti-hormonal
or aromatase inhibitor therapies, as well as an aid in the prognosis and management of breast cancer.
Total Score = PS + IS
Each Proportion Score encompasses a range represented by a whole number.
1. Elledge RM, Fuqua SAW. Estrogen and progesterone receptors. 6. Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM. Prognostic and predictive
In: Harris, et al, editors. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott, factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol.
Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 471-3. 1998;11:155-68.
2. Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, Thor AD, Allred DC, Clark GM, 7. McGuire WL, Chamness GC, Fuqua SA. Estrogen receptor variants
et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American in clinical breast cancer. Mol Endocrinol. 1991;5:1571-7.
Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med.
8. Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status
2000;124:966-78.
by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for
3. Bardou VJ, Arpino G, Elledge RM, Osborne CK, Clark GM. Progesterone predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.
receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474-81.
receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast
9. Mohsin SK, Weiss H, Havighurst T, Clark GM, Berardo M, Roanh LD,
cancer databases. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1973-9.
et al. Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical
4. Rhodes A, Jasani B, Balaton AJ, Miller KD. Immunohistochemical outcome in breast cancer: a validation study. Modern Pathol.
demonstration of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: correlation 2004;17:1545-54.
of standards achieved on in house tumours with that achieved on
10. Phillips T, Murray G, Wakamiya K, Askaa J, Huang D, Welcher R, Pii K,
external quality assessment material in over 150 laboratories from
Allred DC. Development of standard estrogen and progesterone
26 countries. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:292-301.
receptor immunohistochemical assays for selection of patients for
5. Elledge RM, Green S, Pugh R, Allred DC, Clark GM, Hill J, et al. antihormonal therapy. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol.
Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by 2007;15:325-331.
ligand-binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno-
histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic
breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Int J Cancer.
2000;89:111-7.
References
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
NOTES
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
www.dako.com +32 016 38 72 20 +49 40 69 69 470 +31 20 42 11 100 +46 8 556 20 600 +1 805 566 6655
Distributors in more Canada Ireland Norway
than 50 countries +1 905 858 8510 +353 1 479 0568 +47 23 14 05 40