Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Field Implementation Details F0951
Field Implementation Details F0951
F0951
HSE SITE SELF-ASSESSMENT
PROGRAM SELF-ASSESSMENT
USER INSTRUCTIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Opening Conference
Scoring
Strategic Initiatives
Reduction Points
Final Scoring
Closing Conference
Final Report
Closeout Reports
PROGRAM SELF-ASSESSMENT
USER INSTRUCTION
INTRODUCTION
Part of having a successful health, safety and environmental (HSE) process in place is also having a method of performance measurement and self-assessment that continually identifies
The HSE self-assessment process provides a systematic method of assessing and quantifying performance in a detailed but uncomplicated fashion, and assesses the administrative elem
This process gives those performing the self-assessment an agenda of critical items to review, and when performing follow-up self-assessment, can prompt the evaluator(s) to revisit pa
For management and supervision, the report format presents the bottom line results as "Pass/Fail" without having to read and interpret an entire report or executive summary. However
In addition to providing a consistent means of self-assessment, this process is well-suited to both those performing the self-assessment and those who will use the information to improv
The following information is intended to give you a basic understanding of how this self-assessment process is intended to work from start to finish.
Preparation is a key element in providing a thorough and meaningful self-assessment. Having an appreciation of the operation will give those conducting the self-assessment the ability
As a rule, the evaluator should research the following items when learning about the operation and for the purpose of planning an effective and efficient self-assessment:
§ Injury and illness experience (at least for the past year).
§ Type of operation and related activities (such as heavy equipment, construction, operation).
§ Contractors/subcontractors
§ Results of the last self-assessment and open/outstanding issues/recommendations.
§ Regulatory issues and concerns.
§ Operation management concerns/issues.
§ Special clothing and personal protective equipment needs.
§ Special training/orientation requirements
§ Cultural sensitivities.
Having these items and other similar preparatory items addressed, those performing the self-assessment can spend less time in preparation and orientation on site and more time perform
The HSE self-assessment process can be performed at any time, but there are different times when more benefit can be realized due to the phase of operation, schedule, and time lapse s
There are several indicators that can be used in determining when the best time is to perform the self-assessment. It may be considered appropriate to conduct the self-assessment with
It is important to note that self-assessments can be either proactive or reactive. Proactive self-assessments are those strategically planned with the purpose being that of prevention and
Some of the common indicators to considered when deciding when to conduct an HSE self-assessment are:
OPENING CONFERENCE
Initiating the self-assessment process should always begin with an opening conference. The conference must include, at a minimum, the operations manager and key management staff
It is not recommended that the opening conferences involve a large number of people or last more than one hour.
With the opening conference completed, the self-assessment effort can begin.
SCORING
The HSE self-assessment process is designed to "score" the level of compliance achieved against company and regulatory HSE requirements. The HSE self-assessment process scoring
To achieve a compliance score, each element (line item) in the self-assessment has been given a numeric value, which represents the maximum possible score for full compliance.
For the administrative portion of the self-assessment, the maximum possible points range from 1 to 3, with one category having a weighting of 10. The gravity of thes
For the field execution portion of the self-assessment, the maximum possible points range from 1 to 4, and are described as follows:
1 = Failure would not result in damage or injury but constitutes a violation of a standard or procedure
2 = Failure could result in nothing more serious than minor injury or damage
3 = Failure could result in serious injury or damage
4 = Failure would result in serious injury or damage
When assessing each element, the evaluator must determine whether full, partial, or zero score is warranted based on inspection and observation.
It is recommended that the use of whole numbers, exclusively, be avoided. To accurately express the observed level of compliance it may require a decimal numeral.
It is impossible to eliminate subjectivity on the part of the evaluator, but this method, coupled with the evaluator's comments, will support the assessed score. The evaluator must make
When determining the compliance score of each line item, the evaluator should consider several factors such as:
§ The seriousness (injury potential) of the deficiency (actions or conditions)
§ What percentage of the observations made, of the line item, were deficient?
§ Is the deficiency a general condition or isolated case?
§ How does the deficiency influence the compliance level of other activities or conditions?
§ Is the deficiency a repeat action or condition of a previous self-assessment?
These considerations will help determine the gravity of the deficiency and should give the evaluator the justification for the score given.
Line items that do not apply to the operation being reviewed are excluded by simply marking N/A (not applicable) in the "maximum possible" column, the "assessed" column and the "
Furthermore, if there are line items that apply to operations that have taken place and/or will take place again, but were not in operation or practice and were not observed at the time of
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
As the company moves forward through the many dynamics of change that are encountered in the construction and maintenance industries, many processes and cultural values must be
Changes at the client level and changes in markets and technologies can either enhance or challenge our HSE culture and the processes we employ.
Corporate HSE will continually assess where our greatest strengths and weaknesses are in the HSE processes. Where failure or sustained weakness is found, such elements will be chan
Strategic initiatives will change with some regularity. Where improvements are made and positive performance is sustained, a particular initiative can be removed. Where the opposite
Each strategic initiative element (individual initiative title) is worth 4 points and will be a part of the Administration element.
Scoring will be consistent with the methodology previously explained in the Scoring section.
The HSE Board and the Business Unit HSE Leads can make some or all of the strategic initiatives applicable on a project-by-project basis, regardless of the general intent of the initiat
To properly assess the applicable strategic initiative(s), the evaluator must have a complete copy of the current initiatives available. If the initiative applies, and it has not been impleme
REDUCTION POINTS
Reductions in the score, due to penalty points, must be considered as well. There are 3 types of penalty reductions:
§ Repeat deficiency
§ Imminent danger
§ Environmental damage
Penalty reduction categories offer significant impact against the final score. The repeated deficiency reduction highlights the importance of correcting problems once discovered. The i
Penalty points for repeated deficiencies should be used judiciously by the evaluator. The intent of this penalty feature is to penalize a project for allowing a known action or condition to
In some cases the same or similar problem may reccur in whole or in part, involving different people or places. This may or may not need to be counted as a repeat, resulting in a penal
However, if the evaluator finds the exact violation just as it was in the previous self-assessment, and no reasonable effort has been made by management to correct the problem, such w
When assigning reduction points for a repeat, the evaluator must be prepared to support with commitment and confidence his/her position. Supporting documentation could be very be
When considering whether or not to assign the penalty reduction, consider these questions:
If the answer to all of these is "Yes," it is most certainly a condition worthy of a penalty point reduction.
If any one of these questions is answered "No," there is probably not a repeat condition present or a fair reason to issue a penalty reduction.
It is not intended that this self-assessment process be used to specifically uncover repeated deficiencies; the primary purpose is program strength assessment. However, where it is clear
Example:
The evaluator finds a repeat condition that has been determined to meet the reduction point criteria. The line item being assessed has a maximum possible score of 3 points.
Applying the repeat penalty calculation of -10 x the maximum possible, the assessed score for that line item would be -30. This score must be manually entered into the "Repeated Def
Imminent danger is defined as a condition or action in the workplace that is likely to cause serious physical harm immediately or before the action or condition of imminence of such da
Examples of imminent danger could include but are not limited to:
§ Employee(s) directly exposed to electrically energized equipment without proper protection or lock out.
§ Employee(s) exposed to a fall hazard without the use or presence of any fall arrest or fall protection equipment.
§ Floor/roof openings that are uncovered and unbarricaded with one or more employees immediately present.
§ Employees(s) in an excavation greater than 5 ft (1.5 m) in depth that is not shored/sloped as required for the soil-type present.
§ Violation of a safe work permit.
As mentioned before, assigning penalty points must be done judiciously by the evaluator.
Assigning a penalty for imminent danger must not be done in haste since doing so will almost certainly cause the project to receive a failing or near failing score. Two imminent dange
It is not the intention of the self-assessment process to find imminent danger. The purpose is to assess program strengths. However, conditions or actions that clearly pose imminent da
It is extremely important that the evaluator is clearly certain of all actions and conditions involved before making his/her determination. It will be very important later when explaining
If imminent danger is observed, the evaluator cannot leave the situation without making certain corrective action has been implemented immediately. If measures to stop work or imm
An imminent danger situation results in a reduction of the final subtotal by 15% per occurrence. If there is an occurrence, the evaluator must calculate 15% of the maximum possible s
Environmental damage is defined as an existing degraded condition of the natural or human environment, or an action in the workplace that could be reasonably expected to lead to or
Examples of environmental danger may include but are not limited to:
Assigning penalty points for environmental damage is similar to assigning penalty points for imminent danger in that it must be done judiciously, thoroughly thought out, and documen
For any environmental damage penalty, the evaluator must be clear and definitive of the condition and results of inaction to correct the problem. Documentation must be complete for th
Because of the close relationship between safety, health, and the environment, if a situation is found to be both an imminent danger and an environmental damage condition, then the im
An environmental damage situation results in a reduction of the final subtotal by 7% per occurrence. If there is an occurrence, the evaluator must calculate 7% of the line item maximu
FINAL SCORING
At the conclusion of each section, there is a score subtotal. The results of the self-assessment of that section are entered on that page. The subtotal shows:
There is a summary of all sections immediately following the first page (final summary) titled the Detailed Assessment Score Summary. This summary is divided into the administrativ
The total points are then transferred to page 1, the final score page. At this point the administrative and field implementation subtotals are brought together and the final score calculate
The score number (compliance score) is a percentage of the maximum possible score, derived by dividing the assessed total by the maximum possible total. This score is given for the
The final scoring summary page (page 1) also has a section titled Compliance Standard Achieved. If the compliance score in each of the subtotal lines exceeds 90%, then the standard o
The final assessment score is a result of dividing the total maximum possible points into the total assessed score minus the total reduction points penalty, if applicable.
* Total Reduction Points = RD (Repeat Deficiency) + IDR( Imminent Danger) + EDR(Environmental Damage)
Again, the purpose of the final assessment score and sectional summaries are to show management "at a glance" the compliance rating and where the strengths and weaknesses are. Fro
Each section of the self-assessment includes a column for the evaluator's comments. The evaluator's comments do not have to be confined to deficiencies only, positive remarks are val
Additionally, it may be worthwhile to offer a recommendation based on the evaluator’s view of the deficiency.
The column does not offer much room for any detailed text. The evaluator can list all comments and recommendations as an attachment to the self-assessment report and note in each c
Comments should be detailed but as concise as possible. Exact location, times, equipment numbers, and other such details that will take the reader directly to the subject of concern sho
Recommendations should be offered whenever possible, but only if the evaluator is certain in his/her mind that it will adequately address the need or deficiency. Reference to policy, st
CLOSING CONFERENCE
The closing conference is a critical portion of the self-assessment process. This is where Site Management has the opportunity to review in detail the findings of the evaluator.
§ The evaluator(s) should present, in this order, the final score, a breakdown of the scoring by section, and a review of all penalty reductions. If needed, especially where a section faile
§ At the very least the evaluator should share those items that scored the poorest or are worthy of greater concern due to the hazard exposure/potential.
§ Site Operations Management has the opportunity to challenge the findings and score assessments. The evaluator should be prepared to provide his/her rationale and supporting infor
§ It is important to note that this phase of the process is done in fairness and must be done with the approach that management deserves an opportunity to discuss th
§ It is also important to note that the evaluator is under no obligation to change an assessed score or comment unless he/she feels that there is a valid reason to do s
§ Site Operations Management will have the information firsthand from the evaluator(s), and all will know what the final score, deficiencies, and subsequent comment
A copy of the self-assessment report (whether "rough" or final) must be given to the Site/Project Manager at the conclusion of the closing conference.
The final report must not contain anything different or any surprises that vary from what was disclosed in the closing conference.
The length of the closing conference will vary and depends on the size of the operation, issues and deficiencies noted, and the degree of questions asked. In any case, plenty of time mu
FINAL REPORT
Even though a copy of the full self-assessment is left with the project team after the closing conference, a final "cleaned up" report must be issued.
The evaluator should once again review the report, checking for any errors, inaccuracies, or omissions.
Once the report is cleaned up, the final comments and recommendations are added. The final report must be printed, bound, and delivered to the project and to distribution, in a timely
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CLOSEOUT REPORT
It is critical to the complete success of the self-assessment process that the identified deficiencies are corrected as quickly as possible. If the focus of the process is on finding problems
Failure to correct problems that are identified through the self-assessment also raises some significant liability concerns since it can place management in a “failure to act” or “willful ne
The only acceptable approach is to seek out those issues that are problems and correct them. This is a fundamental practice of process improvement. The closeout report is a very simpl
The closeout report is nothing more than a written response from Project Management or some one designated by Project Management that describes which problems
In some cases a problem cannot be controlled or eliminated in a short period of time. The closeout report should also stipulate if such problems exist and what has been done
A closeout report should be submitted back to the evaluator within 30 to 60 days of the self-assessment. In most cases, 30 days is more than enough time to correct the problems noted
Once a closeout report is received from a project, the evaluator should review it for completion and accuracy. If the closeout report is complete and accurate, the self-a
Once the evaluator(s) has received the closeout report from the project acknowledging that all noted deficiencies have been addressed, then the evaluator should issue a letter back to th
UNION
OTHER
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
SITE MANAGER:
HSE MGR/REP:
PROJECT LOCATION:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP: COUNTY
COUNTRY:
PROJECT REGION
Check With "X"
ASSESSMENT TYPE
Check One With "X"
INJURY SUMMARY
REDUCTION
REDUCTION
ASSESSMENT POINTS
ASSESSMENTSCORE
SCORESUMMARY
SUMMARY POINTS
FINAL SCORE
COMPLIANCE Imminent Danger
100.00 MAX
POSSIBLE
ASSESSED
TOTAL
COMPLIANCE
SCORE (%)
STANDARD
ACHIEVED
A. Instances
= 0.00
Environmental Damage
ADMINISTRATIVE 891.00 891.00 100.00 YES B. Occurences
= 0.00
ADMINISTRATION - SUMMARY
REPEAT
MAXIMU IMMINEN MINIMUM
ASSESSED ENVIRONMENTA FINAL MET /
SECTION SECTION NAME COMPONENT M T STANDAR
TOTAL DEFICIENC L DAMAGE SCORE NOT MET
POSSIBLE DANGER D
Y
1 HSE Policy Statement HSE 30.0 30.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 27.00 MET
2 HSE Management HSE 50.0 50.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 45.00 MET
3 HSE Recordkeeping HSE 52.0 52.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 46.80 MET
4 Security S 9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 8.10 MET
5 Fire Protection S 13.0 13.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 11.70 MET
6 Emergency Preparedness HSE 137.0 137.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 137.00 123.30 MET
7 Infectious Diseases HE 33.0 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00 29.70 MET
8 Hazard Communication Program HSE 52.0 52.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 46.80 MET
9 Chemical Storage HSE 21.0 21.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.00 18.90 MET
10 Mobile Equipment Operations S 28.0 28.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 25.20 MET
11 Inspection Procedures HSE 44.0 44.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.00 39.60 MET
12 Respiratory Protection HS 26.0 26.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.00 23.40 MET
13 Enforcement and Discipline HSE 10.0 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 9.00 MET
14 Training and Development HSE 55.0 55.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 49.50 MET
15 Performance Indicators HSE 19.0 19.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 17.10 MET
16 Accident/Incident Investigation HSE 15.0 15.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 13.50 MET
17 Contractors HSE 22.0 22.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 19.80 MET
18 Safety Task Assignment (STA) HS 12.0 12.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 MET
19 Regulatory Agency Inspection/Contact HSE 10.0 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 9.00 MET
20 Claims Management HSE 8.0 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 7.20 MET
21 Process Safety Management (PSM) HSE 12.0 12.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 MET
22 Substance Abuse Program HS 11.0 11.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 9.90 MET
ADMINISTRATION - SUMMARY
REPEAT
MAXIMU IMMINEN MINIMUM
ASSESSED ENVIRONMENTA FINAL MET /
SECTION SECTION NAME COMPONENT M T STANDAR
TOTAL DEFICIENC L DAMAGE SCORE NOT MET
POSSIBLE DANGER D
Y
23 Strategic Initiatives HSE 52.0 52.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 46.80 MET
24 Air Issues HE 29.0 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.00 26.10 MET
25 Electrical ES 10.0 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 9.00 MET
26 Office Areas S 35.0 35.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 31.50 MET
27 Waste Management Issues HE 96.0 96.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 96.00 86.40 MET
Reserved for future Administrative
28-50 HSE 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Items
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
HSE Principle 1 states P2S's HSE commitment and requires written HSE policy for all offices and projects. Principle 2
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND provides for management and resource support to line management for the implementation of HSE policy. Principle 15 states
1 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY that ecological, social and economic systems will be considered in all phases of all projects and that procurement activities will
STATEMENT addresses "green" processes. This will be reflected in the Project HSE policy statement. Refer to Practices 000.653.0000,
and 000.653.0020. Also refer to Practices 000.653.1001 and 000.653.1100.
G. A site specific HSE plan has been developed. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
There is an established hierachy of HSE
S. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
documents.
Personnel have access to the appropraite
T. leve(s) of HSE documentation related to their 1.0 1.0 100.0%
work.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practices 000.653.000 and 000.653.0020. Each facility/site or project should have a designated HSE Manager
2 HSE MANAGEMENT specified in writing. The HSE Manager should have a handbook of HSE information relevant to the site / project. This
information includes licenses and permits. The assessor should address the content, quality, and adequacy of this handbook.
Each project must have a written HSE management plan, as specified in HSE Principle 12. The plan should cover an
assessment of environmental impacts, type and amount of waste produced, soil contamination issues, issues related to releases
of products, materials, or energy, and management and disposal of waste and maintenance of waste records, plus other issues
E. HSE Management Plan or Manual.
as applicable to the project impacts. Practice 000.653.1301 provides a go-by or checklist for the development of a site/project-
specific HSE management system or plan. Addresses topics that are relevant to P2S projects and sites. Applies to all P2S sites
and projects. Also refer to Practices 000.653.1000, 000.653.1202, and 000.653 4000.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Interaction and coordination with the client on
iii 1.0 1.0 100.0%
HSE issues
iv Includes regular HSE reviews 2.0 2.0 100.0%
Landscaping program and schedule (if
v 1.0 1.0 100.0%
applicable).
vi Recycling program. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
vii Energy management program. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
CFC recovery from appliances and air
viii 2.0 2.0 100.0%
conditioners.
Methods and procedures for reporting and
ix 1.0 1.0 100.0%
resolving HSE issues
x. Management of critical incidents 1.0 1.0 100.0%
xi. Flora and fauna. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
xii. Endangered species. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
Personnel are familiar with regulatory
requirements, permits, and higher level plans,
F. and how these requirements are flowed down 1.0 1.0 100.0%
to field level activities (e.g., through checklists,
procedures, etc.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
HSE RECORDKEEPING Refer to Practices 000.653.1203 and 000.653.1500 which provide the minimum requirements for what documents must be
3 PRACTICES retained and what information must be included in the close out report. Also refer to Practice 000.653.2100.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
List of current Evacuation Team members
K. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
available.
Fire first response team training records
L. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
current and available.
Facility fire suppression equipment inspection
M. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
records current and available.
Facility fire alarm equipment inspection
N. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
records current and available.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Pesticide use and control records are properly
X. developed, submitted, maintained, and 2.0 2.0 100.0%
dispositioned.
Records required for activities related to waste
Y. designation land disposal restriction 2.0 2.0 100.0%
requirements are maintained.
Records are maintained for activities related to
Z. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
generator activities.
AA. Other .0.0 0.0
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
D. Light fixture bulb guards are securely in place. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
HSE Principle 10 deals with emergency situations. A written emergency response plan is essential to minimize HSE damage
6 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS from any incident. Verify by inspection that appropriate documentation is available for all types of emergencies. Refer to
Practice 000.653.1200; for offices, refer to Practice 000.653.1002.
EmergencyPreparedness coordinator or
B. similar position appointed to respond to 2.0 2.0 100.0%
emergencies.
Supervisor First Aid training has been
C. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
conducted.
Required emergency lighting and power are
D. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
available.
Required emergency rescue equipment is
E. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
available.
Emergency response team members have been
F. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
identified and trained.
Radios and other communication items are
G. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
available.
Periodic emergency drills are conducted for all
H. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
employees.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
The fire response team has been instructed by a
4 1.0 1.0 100.0%
qualified instructor.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
S. Bomb Threat
Emergency planning requirements are
1 2.0 2.0 100.0%
implemented.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Employees have been provided with
2 information on what to do in the event of a 1.0 1.0 100.0%
local disaster.
Pre-planning for local natural disasters has
3 2.0 2.0 100.0%
been documented.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Periodic drills are conducted to test the
10 1.0 1.0 100.0%
readiness of the plan.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.2002. This practice provide guidelines for establishing sanitation at eating places, restrooms,
washing facilities, drinking water supplies and toilet facilities where improper sanitation will facilitate the spread of infections
7 INFECTIOUS DISEASES diseases. Practice 000.653.2102 describes the malaria control program. Practice 000.653. 2101 describes the infection control
requirements for project/site first-aid providers.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
HSE Principle 3 requires that relevant information be made available to all employees, contractors, clients and the public.
This information includes data on hazardous materials associated with P2S facilities and projects. HSE Principle 5 requires
that a complete and current inventory of all products, wastes and other materials present on the site be maintained. All such
materials shall be properly handled, stored, transported, used and disposed. Refer to Practice 000.653.2007. This practice
HAZARD COMMUNICATION defines the minimum requirements for the storage and use of hazardous materials for all personnel at the various project sites.
8 PROGRAM In doing so, the practice has the following aims:
• Protection of the health and safety of personnel;
• Protection of the environment;
• Compliance with relevant statutory requirements; and
• Reduction and control of risks associated with chemical hazards.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
HSE Principle 5 requires accounting for all hazardous materials, including chemicals at P2S facilities and projects. In recent
years, the community has become increasingly aware and concerned about the storage and use of chemicals. This has led to a
9 CHEMICAL STORAGE response by governments, which control health, safety and environmental legislation. All chemicals used and stored on site
must be properly stored and documented. Refer to Practice 000.653.3102.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practices 000.653.3200 and 000.653.3201. Defines requirements for operation of vehicles and mobile equipment at
work site. Applies to all work sites for P2S Project and contractor personnel. Addresses:
MOBILE EQUIPMENT • Mobilization of vehicles and mobile equipment
10 OPERATIONS • Driver qualifications
• Road rules
• Vehicle inspections and maintenance and the use of suspended personnel work baskets
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.3002. Provides the guidelines for the selection, use and maintenance of respirators for the
protection of employees against the inhalation of harmful air contaminants and oxygen-deficient atmospheres in the
12 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION workplace where required by regulations and/or specified by P2S Corporate HSE. Outlines the personnel responsibilities,
medical evaluations and the use, maintenance and selection of respiratory protection. Applies to all P2S and contractor
personnel.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Hose couplings used with supplied air
J. respirators are not intermingled with other 2.0 2.0 100.0%
couplings.
Breathing air cylinders are labeled as
K. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
required.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practices 000.653.1001 and 000.653.1005. Employee, contractor, and visitor HSE responsibilities are defined during
ENFORCEMENT AND orientation training ( 000.653.1001). Practive 000.653.1005 provides guidance for disciplining personnel that intentionally or
13 DISCIPLINE unintentuinally violate HSE rules. Outlines HSE violation classifications and their penalties, and management procedures in
the event of a violation. Applies globally to P2S employees and contractors.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
HSE Principle 4 supports the vital importance and requirement of employee training at all levels. Practice 000.653.1001
provides an outline of site/project specific HSE orientation and training material for employees, contractors and site visitors.
14 TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT The material is to be adapted to project and site specific conditions. Describes new employee and visitor orientation and
training procedures and content. Applies to all P2S, contractors/subcontractors and visitors.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.8104. Defines the reporting and rectification system for hazards. Refer to Practice 000.653.1202 -
defines the reporting and investigation system for any incidents or Major Events that may occur. Outlines the requirements
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT and responsibilities for reporting and investigating hazards and incidents. Includes a description of:
16 INVESTIGATION
• Reporting requirements for incidents and hazards;
• Incident and hazard investigations; and
• Responsibilities for managing the above activities.
Applies to all P2S and contractor personnel engaged in related activities at Project work sites.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
HSE Principles 8 and 11 describe the basis for contracts with suppliers and contractors. Defines minimum HSE requirements
for contractors performing field work for P2S. Contains descriptions for contractor HSE responsibilities and authorities and a
17 CONTRACTORS summary of elements to be embedded in contractors’ project-specific HSE plans. Applies globally to P2S’s contractors. Refer
to Practice 000.653.1003.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Contractors are required to utilize the STA
K. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
process (or equivalent program).
L. Other 0.0 0.0
Refer to Practice 000.653.1304. Provides guidelines for identifying hazards and to develop safe work procedures to enable the
SAFETY TASK ASSIGNMENT work to be done safely. Outlines steps for identifying and analyzing project site hazards, assessing their risks and reducing or
18 (STA) eliminating them to the extent practicable. Applies to all work places for all project and contractor personnel at all project
sites.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
REGULATORY AGENCY Refer to Practice 000.653.1305. Defines inspection and audit requirements. Outlines requirements and steps for regular
19 INSPECTION/CONTACT planned internal inspections and audits, and audits by outside regulatory agencies. Applies to all P2S projects.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.1202. Defines the required components of P2S’s worker's compensation program. Addresses
worker's compensation issues such as:
• Carrier performance standards;
20 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT • Claims management; and
• Project closure.
Applies globally where required by law.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.1303. Provides the minimum requirements for the management of hazards associated with
PROCESS SAFETY processes using highly hazardous chemicals. It defines P2S and client/owner responsibilities regarding actions that must be
21 MANAGEMENT (PSM)
taken to prevent or minimize the consequences of accidents involving highly hazardous chemicals in an effort to protect
employees. Defines Process Safety Management (PSM), including training requirements.
Applies globally to P2S and its contractors where the client/owner has developed a PSM program.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.1400. P2S maintains a strong commitment to its employees to provide a safe workplace and to
establish programs promoting excellent standards of safety. The company believes the work environment is safer and more
productive without the presence of controlled substances. Therefore, the company prohibits the possession, use, manufacture,
distribution, dispensation or presence of any controlled substance in the workplace without a valid prescription from a
22 SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM physician. Consistent with the spirit and intent of this policy, the company expects employees to report for work in proper
condition to perform their duties. This policy/procedure is intended to prevent the use and presence of drugs, alcohol, or other
contraband in the working environment. Outlines substance abuse policy, criteria for substance abuse testing and substance
thresholds. Applies globally to all P2S employees, contractors, subcontractors, agency personnel, and consultants.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
All contractors / subcontractors are required to
J. adhere to the Corporate substance abuse 1.0 1.0 100.0%
prevention program.
K. The project includes testing for alcohol. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
L. Other 0.0 0.0
Corporate HSE will continually evaluate where P2S's greatest strengths and weaknesses are in the HSE process. Where
23 STRATEGIC INITIATIVES failure or sustained weakness is found, such elements will be changed to the degree necessary to bring that portion of our
process back in line with our performance expectations. These are known as strategic initiatives.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.4000. There are differences in air regulations depending on your location. Most regulations
categorize areas not meeting air pollution standards into four categories: extreme, severe, serious, and moderate / marginal.
Air quality management is affected by gases and vapors discharged from the exhausts of a variety of sources including paint
24 AIR ISSUES shop, industrial gases discharged via vapor recovery on petroleum equipment, and blowers. The assessor should verify the
number and locations of any vents or ducts, including those that may cause fugitive emissions. Examples of management of
air issues on projects are dust control (for dusty roads, especially near communities) and air emissions from incinerators at
employee camps.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
X. Chairs are free of sharp edges, burrs, splinters 1.0 1.0 100.0%
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Refer to Practice 000.653.4000. Waste management issues including minimization and recycling are addressed in
27 WASTE MANAGEMENT ISSUES 000.653.4000.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
12 Treated timber 1.0 1.0 100.0%
13 Light bulbs (mercury, sodium) 1.0 1.0 100.0%
14 Non-recyclable waste 1.0 1.0 100.0%
All solid wastes must be stored in such a way that pollution of the environment cannot occur through: leaching of the contents
of a container, accidental spillage from the container, the placing of liquids that might enter the storage in the solid waste bin
H. Solid Waste Storage
or overfilling so that the contents blow about and become scattered over the site. Verify that all bins are secure, covered where
necessary and they cannot escape.
Liquid wastes consist of storm water which is discharged to the natural environment; domestic waste from toilets, washrooms,
and non-commercial kitchens and acceptable discharge to the sewer; trade waste generated from workshops and other
Liquid wastes generated at this facility or industrial facilities; liquid wastes that are removed by contractor from grease traps, sludge pits, septic tanks, and waste
I
project: chemicals, oils or contaminated aqueous wastes, tanks, pits or drums and removed by contractor. The assessor should verify
every type of liquid waste generated to determine how it is disposed of, the destination of the waste, and whether it is reused or
recycled when possible.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
Storm water discharges contain anything that
1a 4.0 4.0 100.0%
may pollute the environment.
A water pollution license or discharge permit
1b 3.0 3.0 100.0%
is held for this facility or project.
ADMINISTRATION - DETAILS
* REPEATED DEFICIENCY = -10 Max Possible
** IMMINENT DANGER SCORE PENALTY
= 15% Reduction of Assessment Score **
*** ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE *
IMMINENT *** EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS
= 7% Reduction of Assessment Score Percentage REPEATED
MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSED 0- DEFICIENCIES
POSSIBLE DANGER DAMAGE
100
(X)
(X)
(X)
The site has pollution control equipment
N. available and the site has implemented controls 3.0 3.0 100.0%
to reduce water discharges.
Accumulation areas are appropriately
O. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
managed
P. Accumulation areas are inspected. 2.0 2.0 100.0%
IMMINEN
MAXIMU REPEAT MINIMUM
ASSESSED T ENVIRONMENT FINAL MET /
SECTION SECTION NAME COMPONENT M DEFICIENC STANDAR
TOTAL DANGER AL DANGER SCORE NOT MET
POSSIBLE Y D
61 103.00 MET
Hot Work (Welding, Heating, Burning) S 103.0 103.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.7
62 Electrical S 62.0 62.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.00 55.8 MET
63 Equipment Operations S 159.0 159.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 159.00 143.1 MET
64 First Line Breaks HSE 36.0 36.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 32.4 MET
65 Excavation and Trenching HS 39.0 39.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.00 35.1 MET
Steel Erection and Floor and Wall
66 S 52.0 52.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 46.8 MET
Opening
67 Material Handling and Storage HSE 31.0 31.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.00 27.9 MET
68 Signs, Signals, Barricades S 25.0 25.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 22.5 MET
69 Traffic Control S 25.0 25.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
70 Fire Prevention and Protection HS 42.0 42.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.00 37.8 MET
Ladders, Scaffolds, and Elevated Work
71 S 141.0 141.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 141.00 126.9 MET
Platforms
Concrete, Concrete Forms, Shoring,
72 HS 26.0 26.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.00 23.4 MET
Masonry
73 Demolition S 22.0 22.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 19.8 MET
IMMINEN
MAXIMU REPEAT MINIMUM
ASSESSED T ENVIRONMENT FINAL MET /
SECTION SECTION NAME COMPONENT M DEFICIENC STANDAR
TOTAL DANGER AL DANGER SCORE NOT MET
POSSIBLE Y D
74 Blasting - Use of Explosives S 19.0 19.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 17.1 MET
75 High-Pressure Water Cleaning HS 42.0 42.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.00 37.8 MET
76 Abrasive Blasting S 58.0 58.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.00 52.2 MET
77 Tank and Piping System Testing S 24.0 24.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 21.6 MET
78 Hot Tapping Procedure S 20.0 20.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 18 MET
79 Traveling and Working Alone S 3.0 3.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.7 MET
80 Confined Spaces HS 24.0 24.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 21.6 MET
81 Radiation HSE 16.0 16.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 14.4 MET
82 Lead H 19.0 19.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 17.1 MET
83 Fibrous Material and Asbestos HS 34.0 34.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.00 30.6 MET
84 Tire Management S 24.0 24.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 21.6 MET
85 Marine Operations S 31.0 31.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.00 27.9 MET
86 Railroad Operations S 33.0 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00 29.7 MET
87 Site Drainage and Sewage HSE 18.0 18.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.00 16.2 MET
Hazardous and Dangerous Waste
88 E 24.0 24.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 21.6 MET
Management
89 Water Quality E 27.0 27.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.00 24.3 MET
90 Storage Tanks E 9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 8.1 MET
91 Polychlorinated Biphenyls E 6.0 6.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 5.4 MET
92 Pesticide Use E 3.0 3.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.7 MET
93 Potable Water HSE 4.0 4.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 3.6 MET
COMMUNICATION AND HSE Principle 3 requires establishment of communication between P2S, client, contractors, and others with an interest in
52 HSE. Refer to Practices 000.653.0020 and 000.653.1000.
COORDINATION
Regular meetings are held with the client and
A. contractors/subcontractors to discuss HSE 1.0 1.0 100.0%
issues.
A project HSE Committee has been established
that includes management, employees,
B. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
contractor management, and contractor
employees.
Refer to Practice 000.653.2001. This practice provides guidance for a field Health Management Plan (HMP). Each project
should develop a site- specific HMP that takes into consideration in-country and local requirements, as well as the site
53 HEALTH AND HYGIENE conditions and planned activities. Practice 000.653.2002 outlines minimum requirements for maintaining the sanitation of
the project's/site’s eating, restroom, and other related facilities used by employees at the project/site. Also refer to Practices
000.653.2003, Working in Heat, and 000.653.1401, Work Hour Control/Working Alone.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3318. This practice outlines methods for identifying hazards and developing safe work practices for
PRE-COMMISSIONING
54 the pre-commissioning and commissioning stages. Also refer to Practices 000.653.1302, 000.653.3101, 000.653.3315, and
AND COMMISSIONING 000.653.3322.
SPILL CONTROL Refer to Practices 000.653.1200 and 000.653.4000. Spills are minor emergencies that can be managed by onsite personnel.
55 Written instructions should be available and staff be instructed and trained in accident and spill control methods. Suitable
AND PREVENTION equipment and materials should be provided.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE Refer to Practice 000.653.3000. Defines the PPE requirements for projects and all associated worksites. Outlines the basic
57 PPE requirements. Applies to all P2S contractors and all other personnel engaged at the project worksites.
EQUIPMENT (PPE)
A. Head Protection
Refer to Practice 000.653.3306. Provides minimum safety requirements for the operation, inspection, and storage of powder-
actuated fastening tools. The use of powder-actuated fastening tools must meet the requirements of national and local
59 POWDER-ACTUATED TOOLS governments and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 10.3 1985. Applies to all projects/sites and execution
offices.
POWER TOOLS Refer to Practices 000.653.3306 and 000.653.3308 for guidance on inspection and safe operations of power lawn equipment
60 AND POWER EQUIPMENT and other tools and equipment.
Refer to Practices 000.653.1302, 000.653.3101, and 000.653.3103. These practices define the requirements associated with
work permits in general and permits to perform hot work in particular, as well as the requirements for handling compressed
HOT WORK gas cylinders. A Hot Work Permit is required when introducing an ignition source in an area of the worksite where fire or
61
(Welding, Heating, Burning) explosion could occur. The source may be a high energy or low energy form. Outlines the individual responsibilities for
employees involved in permitting and executing hot work, hot work permit requirements, and exemptions, document contro,
and training.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3315 . Outlines the minimum requirements for isolating (lock out/tag out) hazardous energy and
inspection of electrical equipment. Each country has different voltages and specific requirements for electrical safety. It is
62 ELECTRICAL the responsibility of the Project/Site Manager to comply with applicable local legislation and codes of practice. Also refer to
Practice 000.653.8150, Working Near Overhead Power Lines. Applies to all of P2S’s workplaces.
HSE Principle 9 declares that systems be established for reducing and eliminating hazards and risks in the field. This
63 EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS includes equipment operation. Refer to Practices 000.653.3200, 000.653.3201, and 000.653.3211.
2 Loose debris is kept clear of the landing area. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
Refer the Practice 000.653.3320. This practice provides the minimum requirements that must be met before employees may
64 FIRST LINE BREAKS enter a piping system or equipment. This practice also applies to all subsequent breaks in all undrained lines.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3311. Covers all work on P2S projects that involves excavating ground or breaking into walls,
floors, and ceilings that conceal services or provide structural support. It includes such operations as spiking, driving of
65 EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING poles, piles and pipes, chasing, and excavations. Describes the individual responsibilities of those involved in
excavation/break-in permitting, the permit requirements, and the issuing of excavation permits. Applies to all P2S and
contractor employeesl. Also refer to Practice 000.653.3322.
D. Spoil dirt is at least 2 ft (0.6 m) from the edge. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
STEEL ERECTION AND FLOOR Refer to Practice 000.653.3317. Provides minimum requirements for the erection process and protection of employees
66 during preengineered/fabricated building erection (self-perform or contracted). Defines building erection requirements.
AND WALL OPENING Applies to all projects/sites and execution offices. Also refer to Practices 000.653.3304 and 000.653.3311.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3202. Provides guidelines to verify that all project employees fully understand their responsibilities
MATERIAL HANDLING AND and required actions for safely loading and unloading materials from vehicles such as trucks. Addresses the hazards and job
67 safety analysis, manual handling, lifting equipment, safety standards, and designated loading and unloading areas associated
STORAGE with loading and unloading. Applies to employees engaged in supply, delivery, and receipt of equipment and materials
during all phases of construction/maintenance on any area of the project. Also refer to Practice 000.653.3305.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3301. This practice describes the standards for the safe operation of light vehicles and mobile
68 SIGNS, SIGNALS, BARRICADES equipment. The practice addresses project road maintenance, restricted areas and escort vehicles, speed, safety standards,
signage, journey management, driver training, and other related topics.
FIRE PREVENTION AND Refer to Practice 000.653.3100. Fire prevention is part of every activity and should be considered in each STA, JSA, and
70 activity.
PROTECTION
A. Fire extinguishers are provided as required.
J. LPG containers are not stored inside buildings. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
LADDERS, SCAFFOLDS, ROOFS, Refer to Practices 000.653.3204, 000.653.3302, and 000.653.3303. Provides for the safety of employees who may need to
work at height. Wherever practicable, the need for employeesl to work at height should be eliminated. Describes controls for
71 AND ELEVATED WORK working at height and associated risk assessments. Applies to P2S project and contractor employees. Also refer to Practice
PLATFORMS 000.653.3304.
A. Ladders Refer to Practice 000.653.3302.
1 In good condition. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
2 Built and used in an approved manner. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
Secured in an approved manner and placed at
3 3.0 3.0 100.0%
the correct angle.
Exceed the landing area by 3 ft (.91 m) or have
4 3.0 3.0 100.0%
a grab rail.
Are not used where they can be displaced by
5 doors, equipment, etc., unless protected by 3.0 3.0 100.0%
guards or barricades.
Metal ladders not used where contact with
6 4.0 4.0 100.0%
electrical energy is possible.
7 Fixed ladder landing areas kept clear. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
Sections of cable tray or other materials not
8 3.0 3.0 100.0%
used as ladders.
B. Scaffolds Refer to Practice 000.653.3303.
Scaffolds are provided with required access
1 3.0 3.0 100.0%
and egress.
Scaffolds have a standard guard rail (43 in.
[109.2 cm] top rail, 21 in. [53.3 cm] midrail,
2 3.0 3.0 100.0%
and 4 in [10.2 cm] toe board) whenever
possible.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3312 Provides the requirements for employees who perform work involving earthwork, concrete,
CONCRETE, CONCRETE and masonry. Provides for safe systems of work in place. Describes safety roles for earth moving equipment and concrete
72
FORMS, SHORING, MASONRY work including transport, pumping, cutting, mixing, shoring, precast and masonry construction, and rebar. Covers all work
that involves equipment used in bulk earthworks and civil works practices.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3314. Provides guidelines for those employees required to perform work that involves drilling and
BLASTING - USE OF
74 blasting operations. Addresses managing drilling contractors, blast operations, and encountering fibrous material
EXPLOSIVES procedures. Covers all work that involves drilling and blasting operations. Applies globally to P2S and its contractors.
Refer to 000.653.3319. Provides guidelines for the minimum requirements that will be met by P2S and its
HIGH-PRESSURE WATER contractors/subcontractors when performing high-pressure water cleaning (HPWC). Defines the methods and training
75
CLEANING requirements for high-pressure water cleaning. Applies globally to P2S and its contractors. Also refer to Practice
000.653.3103.
Equipment to be cleaned is
H. dismantled/isolated, locked, and tagged as 4.0 4.0 100.0%
required.
All fittings and components meet
I. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
manufacturer's guidelines.
Records of high-pressure water cleaning
J. 1.0 1.0 100.0%
equipment inspection are on file.
Lance or mole marker 60 cm (24 in.) from
K. 3.0 3.0 100.0%
nozzle end.
Refer to Practice 000.653.2004. This practice outlines minimum requirements for protecting employees engaged in shot,
76 ABRASIVE BLASTING sand, or other abrasive blasting operations. Also refer to Practice 000.653.3103.
TANK AND PIPING SYSTEM Refer to Practice 000.653.3321. This practicee outlines safety requirements for pressure-testing piping and tank systems
77
TESTING regardless of tank or system size or pressure.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3316. This practice identifies the minimum safety requirements when welding a hot tap connection
78 HOT TAPPING PROCEDURE onto an existing pipe or vessel in a refinery, chemical plant, or other similar facility.
Refer to Practice 000.653.3322 Defines the requirements associated with a Permit to Work to enter and perform work in
80 CONFINED SPACES confined spaces. Outlines confined space entry permitting, hazards, requirements for permitting, and employee
responsibilities. Applicable to all confined space entries on the P2S project/site.
Refer to Practice 000.653.2300. Establishes the necessary requirements and controls to be used by employees when
81 RADIATION performing tasks involving X-raying or radiographic work. Details the use of radiation sources. Applies globally to P2S and
its contractors.
Refer to Practice 000.653.2005. Employees may be exposed to lead aerosols through various operations dealing with paint
82 LEAD and coatings. These operations include but are not limited to cutting, welding, abrasive blasting, sanding, and heating.
J. Other
Refer to Practice 000.653.3206. This practices outlines the requirements for operations, hazards, and safe work practices
85 MARINE OPERATIONS including dredging, diving, barge, tug, work boat, floating crane, or similar water activities.
Refer to Practice 000.653.4000. Storm water discharge should be controlled and should be free of pollutants such as
suspended solids, oil, or chemical residues, including detergents and soil or mud from washing vehicles, especially when the
87 SITE DRAINAGE/SEWAGE wash water may carry oil and grease or the seeds of noxious plants into natural waterways. Look for debris in the drains and
traps, blocked drains, or drains with vegetation growing in them.
90 STORAGE TANKS
POLYCHLORINATED
91
BIPHENYLS
92 PESTICIDE USE
Pesticide use and control requirements are
A.
implemented.
3.0 3.0 100.0%
93 POTABLE WATER
Potable water delivery is performed in
accordance with requirements and, at a
A.
minimum, in a sanitary manner, including
4.0 4.0 100.0%
backflow preventers where appropriate.