Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 1 - Pickering V
Assignment 1 - Pickering V
Stephanie McElvain
EDU 210
June 6, 2019
Dr. Dale Warby
No. 510
Abstract
This lawsuit was initiated by a teacher (the plaintiff) who was dismissed after writing and
publishing inaccurate accusations against the Board’s rations of school funds between
educational and athletic programs, and the Board’s lack of relaying correct information to the
public. The Board of Education (the defendant) found all accusations presented by the plaintiff to
be untrue. The defendant won this case on the basis that the publication of these accusations in
the local newspaper was, “detrimental to the efficient operation and administration of the schools
of the district” and that the schools required the plaintiff’s dismissal.
1. Was the Board of Education hiding information in the reasoning for higher educational
taxation?
a. No, the Board of Education had determined and proved to the Supreme Court that
2. Was the Board of Education correct in the action that was taken (dismissal from contract)
a. Yes, the appellant made false accusations that may have been detrimental to not
only the Board of Education, but to the schools and administration as well.
Pickering was denied the claim of Freedom of Speech in the court proceedings
The court decided this case in favor of the Board of Education because of Pickering’s false and
detrimental accusations. The Board of Education was cleared for the right to dismiss Pickering
from his teaching position on the grounds that, ” the teacher by virtue of his public employment
has a duty of loyalty to support his superiors in attaining the generally accepted goals of
education and that, if he must speak out publicly, he should do so factually and accurately,
References
FindLaw (n.d.). Pickering V.S. Board of Education. Retrieved from
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/391/563.html