Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Roberts v. Chappell DIGEST
Roberts v. Chappell DIGEST
Chappell
63 Ohio App. 397 • 26 N.E.2d 930 (1939)
McCurdy, J. / Tita K
Subject Matter: Discharge of secondary parties; by discharge of prior party
Summary:
Makers executed a PN in favor of payee Chappell. Payee then indorsed it holder Roberts. On due presentment, it was dishonored
and due notice of dishonor was given to the payee-indorser. In action filed by the holder against the payee, payee argued that he
has been discharged him of his liability on the note because the holder failed to file a claim against the estate of the maker. WON
failure of a creditor to file his claim against the estate of a deceased principal operates as a discharge of subsequent parties. The SC
answered in the negative.
Doctrines:
The discharge of a prior party referred to is a discharge by some act or neglect of the creditor and does not contemplate a discharge
effected by the operation of law. Rule of construction of NIL contemplates some affirmative act on the part of the holder of the note
which operated to discharge the person primarily liable and does not contemplate a discharge by passive conduct on the holder's
part.
Parties:
Plaintiff Roberts (holder)
Defendant Chappell (payee)
Facts:
1. Jan. 28, 1926: George, Audrey, and Lewis Daily (makers) executed a PN for USD 237, payable to the order of Chappell (payee)
one year from date.
2. Before maturity, it was indorsed to Roberts (holder). On due presentment, it was dishonored. Due notice of dishonor was
given to payee-indorser Chappell.
3. In this action by Roberts (holder) against Chappell (payee-indorser), the latter said that Lewis Daily (maker) was solvent at the
date of his death, Nov. 18, 1930, and since no that was filed by Roberts against Lewis’ estate, the administration for which had
now been closed. Chappell argues that Roberts’ failure to file the claim discharged him of his liability on the note.
Issue/s: WON failure of a creditor to file his claim against the estate of a deceased principal operates as a discharge of subsequent
parties. (NO)
Ratio:
Judgment affirmed.