Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dynamic of Philippines Government
Dynamic of Philippines Government
/dīˈnamiks/
plural
2.the forces or properties which stimulate growth, development, or change within a system or process:"the dynamics of
changing social relations"
Local government hierarchy in the Philippines. The dashed lines emanating from the president means that the president only
exercises general supervision on local government.
Officially local government in the Philippines, often called local government units or LGUs, are divided into three
levels – provinces and independent cities; component cities and municipalities; and barangays. In one area, above
provinces and independent cities, is an autonomous region, the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao. Below
barangays in some cities and municipalities are sitios and puroks. All of these, with the exception of sitios and
puroks, elect their own executives and legislatures. Sitios and puroks are often led by elected barangay councilors.
Provinces and independent cities are organized into national government regions but those are administrative
regions and not separately governed areas with their own elected governments.
According to the Constitution of the Philippines, the local governments "shall enjoy local autonomy", and in which
the Philippine president exercises "general supervision". Congress enacted the Local Government Code of the
Philippines in 1991 to "provide for a more responsive and accountable local government structure instituted through a
system of decentralization with effective mechanisms of recall, initiative, and referendum, allocate among the
different local government units their powers, responsibilities, and resources, and provide for the qualifications,
election, appointment and removal, term, salaries, powers and functions and duties of local officials, and all other
matters relating to the organization and operation of local units." [1]
Contents
Offices[edit]
Local governments have two branches: executive and legislative. All courts in the Philippines are under the Supreme
Court of the Philippines and therefore there are no local-government controlled judicial branches. Nor do local
governments have any prosecutors or public defenders, as those are under the jurisdiction of the national
government.
The executive branch is composed of the regional governor for the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao,
governor for the provinces, mayor for the cities and municipalities, and the barangay captain for the barangays. [2]
Legislatures[edit]
The legislatures review the ordinances and resolutions enacted by the legislatures below. Aside from regular and ex-
officio members, the legislatures above the barangay level also have three sectoral representatives, one each from
women, agricultural or industrial workers, and other sectors.[2]
Level of
Legislature Composition[2] Head
government
total of 24 members:[3]
o Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao (excluding Cotabato City), Sulu:
Regional 6 each, 3 elected from each assembly district
Autonomous Assembly
Legislative
region o Basilan (except Isabela City), Tawi-Tawi: 3 each, elected at- speaker
Assembly[a]
large
Sectoral representatives
Province Sangguniang varies, as of 2019:[3] Vice governor
Panlalawigan[b] o Cavite: 16 SP members, 2 elected from each district
o Cebu: 14 SP members, 2 elected from each district
o Batangas, Isabela,[c] Negros Occidental and Pangasinan:
[d]
12 SP members, 2 elected from each district
o All other provinces of the first and second income classes:
[e]
10 SP members, with seat distribution among districts varying.[f]
o Provinces of the third and fourth income classes:[g] 8 SP
members, with seat distribution among districts varying.[f]
o Provinces of the fifth and sixth income classes: 6 SP
members, 3 per district
President of the provincial chapter of the Liga ng mga Barangay
President of the provincial chapter of the League of Councilors
President of the provincial federation of the Sangguniang Kabataan
Sectoral representatives
varies, as of 2019:[3]
o Manila and Quezon City: 36 councilors, 6 elected from
each district
o Davao City: 24 councilors, 8 elected from each district
o Antipolo, Cagayan de Oro, Cebu
City, Makati, Muntinlupa, Parañaque, Taguig, Zamboanga City: 16
councilors, 8 elected from each district
o Bacoor, Calbayog, San Jose del Monte, and all other cities
in Metro Manila: 12 councilors, 6 elected from each district
Sangguniang o Samal, Sorsogon City: 12 councilors, 4 elected from each
City Vice mayor
Panlungsod[h]
district
o Bacolod, Baguio, Batangas
City, Biñan, Calamba, Dasmariñas, General Santos, Iligan, Iloilo
City, Imus, Lapu-Lapu, Lipa, San Fernando (La
Union), Tuguegarao: 12 councilors, elected at-large
o All other cities: 10 councilors, elected at-large
President of the city chapter of the Liga ng mga Barangay
President of the city federation of the Sangguniang Kabataan
Sectoral representatives
varies, as of 2016:[3]
o Pateros, Metro Manila: 12 councilors, 6 elected from each
district
Sangguniang o All other municipalities: 8 councilors, elected at-large
Municipality Vice mayor
Bayan
President of the municipal chapter of the Liga ng mga Barangay
President of the municipal federation of the Sangguniang Kabataan
Sectoral representatives
Sangguniang 7 members elected at-large Barangay
Barangay Sangguniang Kabataan chairperson captain
Barangay Sangguniang
Sangguniang
7 members elected at-large Kabataan
Kabataan
chairperson
1. ^ The boundaries of ARMM assembly districts are coterminous with the existing congressional districts, except for the 1st Assembly
District of Maguindanao (which excludes Cotabato City and the Lone Assembly District of Basilan (which excludes Isabela City).
2. ^ Provinces that comprise a single congressional district are divided into two SP districts. For provinces comprising
multiple congressional districts, boundaries of SP and congressional districts are coterminous, with the exception of the following:
• Independent cities which are not allowed by law to participate in electing provincial officials are excluded from SP districts.
• The cities of Biñan and San Jose del Monte, despite forming their separate congressional districts, remain part of the 1st SP
district of Laguna and the 4th SP district of Bulacan.
3. ^ Santiago City is excluded from the 4th SP district of Isabela.
4. ^ Dagupan is excluded from the 4th SP district of Pangasinan.
5. ^ Independent cities excluded from provincial elections:
• Naga from Camarines Sur—3rd
• Tacloban from Leyte—1st
• Ormoc from Leyte—4th
• Cotabato City from Maguindanao—1st
• Puerto Princesa from Palawan—3rd
• Angeles from Pampanga—1st
• General Santos from South Cotabato—1st.
6. ^ Jump up to:a b The manner of seat distribution varies, per Republic Act No. 7166: [4]
• For provinces comprising multiple congressional districts and need no boundary adjustments due to independent cities being excluded: each
district receives the same number of members first, then any remainder will get assigned to the districts with higher population counts.
• For provinces comprising multiple congressional districts but have district boundary adjustments: seats are distributed according to the
population size of each SP district after factoring out the independent cities.
• For provinces comprising a single congressional district: seats are usually distributed equally between the two SP districts drawn by
COMELEC, although proportional allocation exists in cases where geography and circumstance have resulted in grossly uneven SP district
population distributions (e.g. Benguet's and Sarangani's SP districts).
7. ^ Butuan is excluded from the 1st SP district of Agusan del Norte.
8. ^ The number of city council members and districts varies per city, as determined by different statutes. For cities comprising multiple
congressional districts, boundaries of city council districts are coterminous with congressional districts, with the exception of the Legislative
district of Taguig-Pateros which encompasses the 2nd SP district of Taguig and the 1st and 2nd SB districts of Pateros. By law, some cities
that are not divided into multiple congressional districts are specifically divided into two (Bacoor, Calbayog, Las
Piñas, Malabon, Mandaluyong, Muntinlupa, Navotas, Pasay, Pasig, San Juan, San Jose del Monte, Valenzuela) or three (Samal, Sorsogon
City) city council districts.
Elected officials[edit]
All elected officials have 3-year terms, and can only serve a maximum of three consecutive terms before being
ineligible for reelection.[5]
*a Sangguniang Kabataan official who has surpassed 21 years of age while in office is allowed to serve for the rest of
the term.[2]
Offices that are common to municipalities, cities and provinces [edit]
There are 21 offices in a government, whether it is municipal, city or provincial. There are some mandatory and
optional offices to the government.
Municipalit Cit
Office Head Province
y y
Legend:
√ - Mandatory
? - Optional
X - Not Applicable
Source: Local Government Code of 1991[8]
Responsibilities[edit]
Among the social services and facilities that local government should provide, as stipulated in Section 17 of the Local
Government Code, are the following:
facilities and research services for agriculture and fishery activities, which include seedling nurseries,
demonstration farms, and irrigation systems;
health services, which include access to primary health care, maternal and child care, and medicines,
medical supplies and equipment;
social welfare services, which include programs and projects for women, children, elderly, and persons with
disabilities, as well as vagrants, beggars, street children, juvenile delinquents, and victims of drug abuse;
information services, which include job placement information systems and a public library;
a solid waste disposal system or environmental management system;
municipal/city/provincial buildings, cultural centers, public parks, playgrounds, and sports facilities and
equipment;
infrastructure facilities such as roads, bridges, school buildings, health clinics, fish ports, water supply
systems, seawalls, dikes, drainage and sewerage, and traffic signals and road signs;
public markets, slaughterhouses, and other local enterprises;
public cemetery;
tourism facilities and other tourist attractions; and
sites for police and fire stations and substations and municipal jail.
Creation and modification of local governments [edit]
As a matter of principle, higher legislative entities have the power to create, divide, merge, abolish, or substantially
alter boundaries of any lower-level local government through a law or ordinance, all subject to approval by a majority
of the votes cast in a plebiscite to be conducted by the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) in the local
government unit or units directly affected. [2] The Local Government Code has also set requisites for creating local
government units.[2] A summary can be found in the table below:
See also[edit]
List of primary local government units of the Philippines
References[edit]
1. ^ "The Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines". www.gov.ph. Archived from the original on 2016-06-17.
Retrieved 2015-11-12.
2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Local Government Code of the Philippines, Book III Archived 2014-10-31 at the Wayback
Machine, Department of Interior and Local Government official website.
3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Commission on Elections (18 August 2015). "COMELEC Resolution No. 9982". Republic of the
Philippines - Commission on Elections. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
4. ^ Congress of the Philippines (26 November 1991). "Republic Act No. 7166 - An Act Providing for Synchronized
National and Local Elections and for Electoral. Reforms, Authorizing Appropriations Therefor, And For Other Purposes".
Retrieved 23 May 2017.
5. ^ Jump up to:a b c Local Government Code, Book I Archived 2008-05-08 at the Wayback Machine, Department of
Interior and Local Government official website.
6. ^ Quismundo, Terra (29 May 2007). "Election law must prevail over culture, says Abalos". Philippine Daily
Inquirer. Retrieved 27 March 2009.
7. ^ Jump up to:a b c Republic Act 9054
8. ^ "Local Government Code of 1991 (Book III: Local Government Units)". Chan Robles Virtual Law Library.
Retrieved November 6, 2010.
9. ^ Republic Act 9009, Chanrobles Law Library.
10. ^ Creation of the province of Shariff Kabunsuan voided Archived 2009-04-01 at the Wayback Machine
Political dynasties in the Philippines
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Philippines
Political dynasties have long been a feature of the Philippine political landscape. They are typically characterized as
families that have established their political or economic dominance in a province and have coordinated efforts to
move on to involvement in national government or other positions of national political prominence. Political dynasties
usually have a strong, consolidated support base concentrated around the province in which they are dominant.
Members of such dynasties usually do not limit their involvement to strictly political activities, and have been found
participating in business or culture-related activities."
Political dynasties started emerging after the Philippine Revolution when the First Republic of the Philippines was
established. With the decline of Spain's economic power and international prestige in the 19th century, the expansion
of British and American influence around the world, and the political current of emergent nationalism among the
children of the economically enfranchised bourgeois, the power of the peninsulares', or Spanish-born aristocracy
declined propitiously. Following the defeat of the Spanish in the Spanish–American War, the surviving members of
the Spanish or Spanish-sanctioned landholding elite and the newly ascendant merchant elite, who were mostly
foreign expatriates or of Chinese origin, formed a de facto aristocracy to replace the power vacuum the Spanish had
left.
Aristocracy survived and prospered under the American colonial regime, and remained a permanent fixture in
Philippine society even following the independence of the Philippines was finally confirmed following the devastation
of the Philippines under the Japanese occupation of the Philippines during World War II. Over the years, political
dynasties continued to adapt, as newer dynasties emerged to fill power vacuums left behind by the extinction of older
dynasties. The majority of the available positions in Philippine government are currently held by members of these
political dynasties. Notable Philippine political dynasties include the Aquino, Marcos, Arroyo, Binay, Duterte, and
Roxas families." There has been a lot of debate regarding the effects political dynasties have on the political and
economic status of Philippine society. Despite the negative reaction of the populace towards political dynasties and
the association between dynastic activities and corruption, [1] it is only prohibited in the members of the youth-
oriented Sangguniang Kabataan.
Contents
1Definition
2Philippine laws
3Statistics of Philippine political dynasties
4Critical reception
o 4.1Negative
o 4.2Positive
5Notable Philippine political families
o 5.1Ampatuan
o 5.2Aquino
o 5.3Estrada
o 5.4Marcos
o 5.5Ortega
o 5.6Roxas
o 5.7Duterte
6See also
7References
Definition[edit]
Political dynasties refer to family units with members involved in government activities. In the Philippines, political
dynasties refer to groups of politicians who come from the same family. The group in question is usually associated
with a certain province or city, which members of the family have led or represented for successive generations. This
can occur in two ways. One way is for members of a family to occupy a same certain government position in every
term. Once the term of the member of a political dynasty runs out, a relative of the incumbent will run in his stead,
thus ensuring political dominance. The second way is for a number of family members to occupy government
positions at the same time.[1] As of the moment, there are no legal documents or laws that officially define a political
dynasty in the Philippines. There have been bills that attempt to define a political dynasty such as the Anti-Dynasty
Bill. However, such attempt usually miscarry and end in failure, as proven by the defeat of the Anti-Dynasty Bill in
Philippine Congress on February 2, 2016.
Philippine laws[edit]
The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines states in Article II Section 26: "The State shall guarantee equal access to
opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law."
Despite the provision in the Constitution, only the Sangguniang Kabataan Reform Act of 2016 is the only statute that
has been implemented concerning the status of political dynasties in the Philippines. The closest explicit mention of
political dynasties in Philippine law can be seen in Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code, where Book I,
Title Two, Chapter 1, Section 43 states the term limit of local government officials. However, it does not include any
limitations on the running of the incumbent's family relations or on the holding of multiple political positions by
members of the same family.
(a) The term of office of all local elective officials elected after the effectivity of this Code shall be three (3) years,
starting from noon of June 30, 1992 or such date as may be provided for by law, except that of elective Barangay
officials: Provided, That all local officials first elected during the local elections immediately following the ratification of
the 1987 Constitution shall serve until noon of June 30, 1992.
(b) No local elective official shall serve for more than three (3) consecutive terms in the same position. Voluntary
renunciation of the office for any length of time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity of service
for the full term for which the elective official concerned was elected. (c) The term of office of Barangay officials and
members of the Sangguniang kabataan shall be for three (3) years, which shall begin after the regular election of
Barangay officials on the second Monday of May 1994.
Several bills have been filed in relation to the prohibition of political dynasties, and are currently pending to be
approved by the Congress. Many have called for the Congress to pass the Anti-Dynasty Law, but this bill has been
passed over by each Congress since 1987.
On January 24, 2011, Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago filed Senate Bill 2649 which prohibits political dynasties
from holding or running for elected local government positions. The bill disqualifies the following candidates from
running for local government positions:
relatives of an incumbent elected official running for re-election up to the second degree of consanguinity,
and are planning to run in the same province in the same election as the elected official
relatives of an incumbent elected official that holds a national position up to the second degree of
consanguinity, and are planning to run in the province of origin of the elected official
persons that are not relatives of an elected official that are candidates to the same position in the same
province in the same election but are related to each other up to the second degree of consanguinity.
The bill also prohibits relatives within the prohibited civil degree of relationship of an incumbent from succeeding to
the incumbent's position, except for the positions of Punong Barangay and Sangguniang Barangay.
Three bills were filed in the House of Representatives which are also in relation to the prohibition of political
dynasties, which are similar in content to Senate Bill 2649:
Critical reception[edit]
Various writers wrote articles that analyze and critique politicians that fall under the domain of a political dynasty.
Often, these articles hold these said persons and families in a critical light. [6] Although political dynasties have already
been present in the Philippines for a significant period of time, the public has only recently started clamoring for a
change in system.[7] The public support for the bill against political dynasties has steadily increased because the
president, while part of a dynasty himself, fully supports the passage of the Anti-Dynasty Bill. [8] In a provincial scale,
political dynasties are often held in higher regard- contrasted with dynasties that oversee a wider public, where
reception is mostly negative. A study that used empirical data correlated political dynasty presence with socio-
economic development. This study stated that "this partial correlation coefficient finds a positive relationship between
poverty incidence and the proportion of political dynasties in each province." Although the study found a correlation,
this does not determine whether it is a causal relationship since poverty is multifaceted. [9]
Negative[edit]
One of the more notable theories concerning the negative effects of political dynasties is a political "Carnegie Effect",
named after Andrew Carnegie. The "Carnegie Effect" is based on Carnegie's decision to give all his wealth to non-
family members, where he argues that his son might have less incentive of working hard if he were to be assured of
his father's wealth.[10] This idea of inherited wealth and connections discouraging future generations to work hard can
also be attributed to dynastic politicians. Dynastic politicians have a significant advantage from the start of their
political career They have a statistically higher probability, due to factors like popularity and incumbency advantage,
to win elections when pitted against politicians with no such political networks. Dynastic politicians also have
generally lower educational attainment, because of their reliance on dynastic connections rather than bureaucratic or
academic competence for their position. [11]
There is also significant evidence to suggest that Philippine political dynasties use their political dominance over their
respective regions to enrich themselves, using methods such as graft or outright bribery of legislators. These kinds of
situations arise as conflicts of interests- political dynasties often hold significant economic power in a province- and
their interests are overrepresented due to dynastic politics. [12] Another negative effect of political dynasties is that
political dynasties tend to be for the status quo and develop interests largely separate from the people they were
supposed to be serving. Dynastic candidates, being almost exclusively from the upper classes, are naturally biased
towards defending their own vested economic interests, which presents conflict of interest problems. Political
dynasties also prevent challengers with potentially effective policy ideas from being able to take office, which limits
the capacity for bureaucratic responsiveness and administrative effectiveness and adaptation to new ideas.
Positive[edit]
Political dynasties also have extra incentive to develop their own jurisdictions. Based on Mancur Olson's theory of
political governance or the "Roving Bandits vs. Stationary Bandits" theory, dynastic politicians are more likely to
pursue long-term development oriented strategies since they expect to hold power and benefit from their position for
longer. This is usually set in contrast to non-dynastic politicians who would, under this theory, have less incentive to
develop due to their limited term. Political dynasties can gain benefits either directly or indirectly through their
relatives.[13] Political dynasties are also responsible for the increase in women's political participation in politics.
Female politicians hailing from political dynasties can easily get into politics due to their connections. [13] Political
dynasties have the advantage of continuity. The more control the family has over the government unit, the more
members of the family can occupy positions of power. Political dynasties can use this continuity by promoting and
enacting laws and ordinances that are long term in nature; with only a slim chance of other candidates outside of the
dynasty interfering with the plans.
Rodrigo Duterte, President since 2016 (Mayor of Davao City 1988-1998, 2001-2010, 2013–16)
Sara Duterte, Mayor since 2016 (Vice Mayor 2007-2010, Mayor of Davao City 2010-2013)
Paolo Duterte, Davao City 1st District Representative since 2019 (Vice Mayor 2013-2018)
Sebastian Duterte, Vice Mayor since 2019