This document analyzes options for the Mysore Ghee Store case using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the ghee market is fragmented with many players and some competition from substitute products. Opportunities exist in market consolidation since differentiation is difficult for a generic product. The case describes four options for Mysore Ghee Store: going retail, outsourcing, investing in real estate, or exporting to the Middle East. Porter's Five Forces analysis indicates buyers have high bargaining power due to many competing brands. Supplier bargaining power is low due to many players. Selling sweet products in shops is identified as the most profitable option to increase market share.
This document analyzes options for the Mysore Ghee Store case using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the ghee market is fragmented with many players and some competition from substitute products. Opportunities exist in market consolidation since differentiation is difficult for a generic product. The case describes four options for Mysore Ghee Store: going retail, outsourcing, investing in real estate, or exporting to the Middle East. Porter's Five Forces analysis indicates buyers have high bargaining power due to many competing brands. Supplier bargaining power is low due to many players. Selling sweet products in shops is identified as the most profitable option to increase market share.
This document analyzes options for the Mysore Ghee Store case using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the ghee market is fragmented with many players and some competition from substitute products. Opportunities exist in market consolidation since differentiation is difficult for a generic product. The case describes four options for Mysore Ghee Store: going retail, outsourcing, investing in real estate, or exporting to the Middle East. Porter's Five Forces analysis indicates buyers have high bargaining power due to many competing brands. Supplier bargaining power is low due to many players. Selling sweet products in shops is identified as the most profitable option to increase market share.
This document analyzes options for the Mysore Ghee Store case using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the ghee market is fragmented with many players and some competition from substitute products. Opportunities exist in market consolidation since differentiation is difficult for a generic product. The case describes four options for Mysore Ghee Store: going retail, outsourcing, investing in real estate, or exporting to the Middle East. Porter's Five Forces analysis indicates buyers have high bargaining power due to many competing brands. Supplier bargaining power is low due to many players. Selling sweet products in shops is identified as the most profitable option to increase market share.
Selecting an appropriate framework for analysis is important to study the environment.
As Porter’s five forces cater to all the elements of the external environment and it is more specific as compared to ETOP which gives a Holistic view but not in detailed form. The impact of various factors can be creatively implemented in porter’s five force. For e.g- socio culture factors can be incorporated in bargaining power of the buyers and the impact of government policies can be creatively incorporated in rivalry. Ghee market is fragmented with various leading players and some local players also. With them 25% competition can be faced from spurious Ghee and Dalda Ghee, backed by huge number of retailers. Opportunities in fragmented markets is through consolidation. Differentiation does not apply here because it is a generic product: commodity, more homogeneity, no importance of branding or logo. Case describes 4 options. Going retail Outsourcing Real Estate Export to Middle East Challenge in going retail in fragmented market of Generic product is there are lots of local players and national players. The competition can also be faced from Spurious ghee, Dalda ghee, Homemade ghee or indirectly the Olive oil. Porter’s Five Force Model Bargaining power of Buyers: high (Multiple brands at a competition price, no brand loyalty and small capacity purchase). Bargaining power is fluctuating with demand. Bargaining power of Suppliers: As fragmented market, higher no of players so switching cost of suppliers is less so the bargaining power of the supplier is also less. (if in B2B- Quality and price matters so brand building is not so important, what matters is personal relationship, vice versa in B2C) Cost structure Comparing per cost of biryani plate and sweet shop, monthly or annually- more profit margin is in Sweet shop. From the values of the growth in CAGR, selling price and Input cost- supplier bargaining power is low. Income statements shows that B2B should be processed. Demand Sizing: 2.14% - total market size for biryani, 37.14% - total market size for sweet shop. So it states Sweet shop is better option to increase the hold in the market. Homemade ghee is less than 20% and from local sellers it is less than 5% Supplier base of MGS: If retail and wholesale is given at same point, then brand building becomes important, then B2B improvement by improving margins on sweet shop as well as biryani points, then you can head on the national players and enjoy largest share. Outsourcing, Exports and Real estate should also be considered. Financial analysis of real estate can also be calculated. Both Qualitative as well as quantitative aspects are taken in mind as protagonist here is attached to the company. Full capacity utilization can be considered for expansion of the business.